september 2015 water conservation report by supplier (by hydro … · 2015-10-30 · september 2015...

Post on 05-Aug-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Santa Cruz City of Central Coast 8% 29.4% 25.2% 41.3 95,224

California Water Service Company King City Central Coast 12% 20.5% 16.1% 51.1 14,999

Goleta Water District Central Coast 12% 28.6% 28.0% 52.8 86,946

Soquel Creek Water District Central Coast 8% 31.3% 26.5% 58.9 39,043

San Luis Obispo City of Central Coast 12% 22.6% 19.2% 60.2 45,802

Morro Bay City of Central Coast 12% 18.2% 17.1% 60.7 10,234

Lompoc City of Central Coast 12% 24.6% 13.5% 64.3 41,541

California Water Service Company Salinas District Central Coast 16% 27.3% 23.2% 66.0 121,530

Marina Coast Water District Central Coast 12% 32.9% 31.9% 68.2 32,375

California-American Water Company Monterey District Central Coast 8% 16.4% 13.2% 70.3 100,623

Santa Barbara City of Central Coast 12% 36.8% 34.8% 72.0 93,091

Watsonville City of Central Coast 20% 23.5% 20.1% 74.1 65,739

Scotts Valley Water District Central Coast 16% 28.7% 26.4% 75.8 10,309

Carpinteria Valley Water District Central Coast 20% 34.1% 34.9% 81.5 14,616

Hollister City of Central Coast 20% 26.4% 27.6% 84.4 20,515

Gilroy City of Central Coast 24% 32.3% 27.8% 90.9 53,306

Santa Maria City of Central Coast 16% 17.6% 14.8% 92.9 102,087

Sunnyslope County Water District Central Coast 28% 36.2% 34.9% 95.7 19,189

Pismo Beach City of Central Coast 24% 24.9% 19.6% 98.7 7,861

Arroyo Grande City of Central Coast 28% 35.6% 31.9% 99.9 17,121

Soledad, City of Central Coast 24% 19.5% 13.4% 102.5 16,729

Morgan Hill City of Central Coast 28% 36.9% 35.8% 103.6 41,779

Alco Water Service Central Coast 24% 23.4% 28.5% 104.7 29,179

Paso Robles City of Central Coast 28% 33.0% 29.5% 114.3 30,450

Atascadero Mutual Water Company Central Coast 28% 32.9% 26.9% 123.3 31,432

Nipomo Community Services District Central Coast 28% 33.0% 28.0% 136.9 12,512

Golden State Water Company Orcutt Central Coast 32% 39.7% 37.2% 137.8 31,872

Montecito Water District Central Coast 32% 47.0% 48.3% 211.9 13,500

Coachella City of Colorado River 24% 20.0% 17.9% 97.2 43,917

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 1 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Calexico City of Colorado River 20% 13.7% -9.3% 101.8 41,033

Twentynine Palms Water District Colorado River 28% 16.0% 13.2% 104.4 18,795

Joshua Basin Water District Colorado River 28% 26.2% 19.2% 110.1 9,514

El Centro City of Colorado River 24% 16.0% 4.9% 114.5 44,311

Imperial, City of Colorado River 24% 15.4% 7.1% 114.7 18,022

Banning City of Colorado River 32% 31.4% 28.4% 120.7 30,325

Mission Springs Water District Colorado River 28% 18.8% 19.2% 123.4 37,600

Blythe City of Colorado River 32% 13.2% 6.4% 132.7 13,839

Indio City of Colorado River 32% 21.6% 12.0% 143.2 88,411

Brawley City of Colorado River 32% 35.8% 33.4% 150.0 27,743

Desert Water Agency Colorado River 36% 30.8% 23.9% 164.6 120,573

Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company Colorado River 36% 31.2% 22.9% 261.6 8,948

Coachella Valley Water District Colorado River 36% 27.1% 16.4% 300.9 213,802

Arcata City of North Coast 4% 1.6% 3.2% 55.2 18,464

Eureka City of North Coast 4% 13.0% 11.6% 59.9 27,052

Crescent City City of North Coast 16% 17.3% 19.1% 60.7 18,290

McKinleyville Community Service District North Coast 4% 18.1% 8.8% 64.9 16,900

Humboldt Community Service District North Coast 24% 11.6% 12.8% 66.1 20,032

Sweetwater Springs Water District North Coast 16% 27.7% 27.4% 66.4 7,751

Rohnert Park City of North Coast 16% 17.9% 13.4% 72.2 43,398

Santa Rosa City of North Coast 16% 26.7% 22.6% 72.3 170,974

Fortuna City of North Coast 24% 22.0% 20.6% 77.7 12,032

Windsor, Town of North Coast 16% 25.4% 23.8% 79.0 27,486

California Water Service Company Redwood Valley North Coast 16% 35.9% 25.9% 81.9 3,198

Healdsburg City of North Coast 24% 28.6% 30.8% 102.9 11,687

Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District North Coast 4% -5.5% -2.7% 104.2 602

Yreka, City of North Coast 32% 17.9% 6.5% 124.6 7,840

South Tahoe Public Utilities District North Lahontan 20% 22.6% 15.8% 85.3 33,124

Truckee-Donner Public Utilities District North Lahontan 28% 31.4% 18.3% 107.5 32,776

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 2 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Tahoe City Public Utilities District North Lahontan 20% 35.1% 27.5% 120.7 8,347

North Tahoe Public Utility District North Lahontan 28% 27.7% 24.5% 125.4 7,500

Susanville City of North Lahontan 36% 20.5% 1.2% 231.6 8,978

California Water Service Company Oroville Sacramento River 28% 28.2% 20.6% 74.1 10,777

Del Oro Water Company Sacramento River 24% 44.5% 45.1% 84.7 9,615

California Water Service Company Dixon, City of Sacramento River 28% 33.3% 28.4% 100.1 9,984

California-American Water Company Sacramento District Sacramento River 20% 38.1% 30.2% 100.4 201,418

California Water Service Company Marysville Sacramento River 24% 29.8% 23.0% 102.9 12,222

Woodland City of Sacramento River 24% 34.5% 29.2% 103.8 57,223

West Sacramento City of Sacramento River 28% 38.0% 30.4% 109.1 50,836

Elk Grove Water Service Sacramento River 28% 37.4% 31.0% 111.9 44,255

Fairfield City of Sacramento River 20% 25.3% 19.8% 112.5 107,540

Davis City of Sacramento River 28% 28.1% 18.2% 113.7 68,315

Sacramento City of Sacramento River 28% 32.5% 26.5% 114.9 480,155

California Water Service Company Willows Sacramento River 28% 34.4% 27.8% 115.0 7,130

Roseville City of Sacramento River 28% 36.8% 30.4% 118.4 122,946

Sacramento County Water Agency Sacramento River 32% 38.5% 33.1% 124.9 173,848

Sacramento Suburban Water District Sacramento River 32% 34.9% 32.7% 126.7 174,847

Shasta Lake City of Sacramento River 28% 36.9% 35.4% 129.7 10,293

Yuba City City of Sacramento River 32% 30.6% 26.8% 130.3 68,379

Fruitridge Vista Water Company Sacramento River 36% 38.9% 41.9% 132.3 21,441

California Water Service Company Chico District Sacramento River 32% 41.5% 35.9% 140.4 102,947

Olivehurst Public Utility District Sacramento River 36% 44.6% 54.9% 141.7 19,509

Vacaville City of Sacramento River 32% 35.9% 31.7% 142.1 86,893

Linda County Water District Sacramento River 32% 36.2% 27.5% 143.4 18,808

Red Bluff City of Sacramento River 36% 32.1% 29.1% 146.4 14,076

Georgetown Divide Public Utilities District Sacramento River 32% 33.2% 17.4% 150.8 9,864

Lincoln City of Sacramento River 32% 34.8% 26.4% 152.9 45,837

Placer County Water Agency Sacramento River 32% 31.9% 26.0% 161.9 95,717

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 3 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Citrus Heights Water District Sacramento River 32% 38.3% 29.1% 164.0 67,333

Galt City of Sacramento River 32% 35.2% 30.2% 168.0 24,289

Golden State Water Company Cordova Sacramento River 36% 36.2% 29.1% 175.6 43,767

Paradise Irrigation District Sacramento River 36% 43.0% 31.4% 175.9 26,032

Nevada Irrigation District Sacramento River 36% 32.9% 18.5% 183.6 44,761

Rio Vista, city of Sacramento River 36% 31.5% 22.5% 186.0 8,324

Folsom City of Sacramento River 32% 30.2% 21.3% 186.4 63,376

Redding City of Sacramento River 36% 30.0% 23.9% 187.0 91,207

Rio Linda - Elverta Community Water District Sacramento River 36% 35.9% 24.4% 199.4 11,013

Carmichael Water District Sacramento River 36% 34.8% 25.5% 205.6 38,354

Fair Oaks Water District Sacramento River 36% 36.2% 25.2% 213.7 36,226

El Dorado Irrigation District Sacramento River 28% 29.5% 19.4% 223.8 118,500

Orange Vale Water Company Sacramento River 36% 37.8% 27.2% 242.0 14,283

Bella Vista Water District Sacramento River 36% 54.5% 51.4% 281.3 17,619

San Juan Water District Sacramento River 36% 38.8% 29.9% 310.0 32,779

North Coast County Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 32.3% 30.9% 38.1 39,000

California Water Service Company South San Francisco San Francisco Bay 8% 22.8% 19.2% 40.6 61,590

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco Bay 8% 15.6% 13.2% 42.8 846,601

Hayward City of San Francisco Bay 8% 26.7% 3.4% 42.9 152,889

Coastside County Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 20.5% 10.6% 44.9 16,668

East Palo Alto, City of San Francisco Bay 8% 25.4% 36.8% 46.7 29,143

Westborough Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 24.8% 29.6% 47.0 14,050

Golden State Water Company Bay Point San Francisco Bay 12% 28.9% 24.5% 56.7 22,258

Milpitas City of San Francisco Bay 12% 26.3% 24.5% 57.8 70,817

Daly City City of San Francisco Bay 8% 10.1% 0.1% 57.8 105,810

Estero Municipal Improvement District San Francisco Bay 12% 17.3% 13.1% 61.6 37,165

Mountain View City of San Francisco Bay 16% 32.8% 25.0% 62.6 76,210

Burlingame City of San Francisco Bay 16% 32.9% 29.8% 64.2 30,282

Redwood City City of San Francisco Bay 8% 29.1% 16.5% 64.6 87,696

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 4 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Sunnyvale City of San Francisco Bay 16% 33.6% 24.5% 65.7 148,028

California Water Service Company Mid Peninsula San Francisco Bay 16% 28.4% 27.6% 66.3 134,929

Dublin San Ramon Services District San Francisco Bay 12% 42.4% 39.6% 67.4 79,593

Great Oaks Water Company Incorporated San Francisco Bay 20% 35.2% 33.0% 71.6 99,199

Vallejo City of San Francisco Bay 16% 23.3% 18.2% 71.7 124,000

Menlo Park City of San Francisco Bay 16% 49.7% 55.7% 71.8 16,066

Millbrae City of San Francisco Bay 16% 28.3% 30.3% 72.4 21,532

American Canyon, City of San Francisco Bay 20% 26.5% 24.2% 72.9 20,080

East Bay Municipal Utilities District San Francisco Bay 16% 27.9% 22.5% 74.0 1,390,000

Alameda County Water District San Francisco Bay 16% 33.4% 26.9% 74.1 346,000

Santa Clara City of San Francisco Bay 16% 23.8% 10.9% 74.2 120,973

San Jose Water Company San Francisco Bay 20% 35.1% 30.8% 76.2 990,000

Petaluma City of San Francisco Bay 16% 26.5% 22.2% 78.8 61,258

Suisun-Solano Water Authority San Francisco Bay 28% 28.2% 29.1% 80.4 28,549

Pittsburg City of San Francisco Bay 20% 24.6% 20.4% 83.4 66,183

Mid-Peninsula Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 30.6% 27.5% 83.6 26,730

San Jose City of San Francisco Bay 20% 32.2% 24.7% 85.0 117,576

Benicia City of San Francisco Bay 20% 35.0% 31.6% 86.0 28,086

North Marin Water District San Francisco Bay 24% 36.3% 40.4% 88.2 61,299

Valley of the Moon Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 29.7% 22.1% 90.2 23,478

Palo Alto City of San Francisco Bay 24% 30.7% 20.4% 94.6 64,403

Marin Municipal Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 21.8% 18.3% 96.9 188,200

Napa City of San Francisco Bay 20% 25.6% 19.4% 97.2 86,051

California Water Service Company Livermore San Francisco Bay 24% 44.5% 39.3% 97.4 58,651

Livermore City of Division of Water Resources San Francisco Bay 20% 38.0% 31.5% 101.6 27,588

Contra Costa Water District San Francisco Bay 28% 40.4% 41.1% 102.7 199,680

Pleasanton City of San Francisco Bay 24% 43.3% 37.5% 107.6 73,067

California Water Service Company Los Altos/Suburban San Francisco Bay 32% 37.6% 33.9% 120.3 68,191

Sonoma City of San Francisco Bay 28% 30.5% 16.7% 129.5 11,579

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 5 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

California Water Service Company Bear Gulch San Francisco Bay 36% 35.7% 29.0% 151.8 70,035

California Water Service Company Stockton San Joaquin River 20% 25.5% 18.8% 73.3 170,703

Calaveras County Water District San Joaquin River 16% 35.5% 28.8% 78.7 48,630

Amador Water Agency San Joaquin River 24% 32.2% 28.2% 78.9 23,347

Patterson City of San Joaquin River 28% 28.7% 43.1% 93.1 21,094

Diablo Water District San Joaquin River 28% 33.8% 30.2% 100.2 38,194

Lathrop, City of San Joaquin River 20% 32.5% 28.4% 101.8 19,831

Ceres City of San Joaquin River 28% 24.4% 18.9% 104.5 47,639

Brentwood City of San Joaquin River 32% 42.1% 36.5% 104.6 56,493

Tuolumne Utilities District San Joaquin River 24% 37.7% 31.4% 104.8 28,997

Antioch City of San Joaquin River 28% 35.0% 31.4% 108.1 108,298

Mountain House Community Services District San Joaquin River n/a 27.8% 27.8% 111.9 14,675

Stockton City of San Joaquin River 28% 32.4% 25.4% 113.7 177,808

Groveland Community Services District San Joaquin River 24% 32.5% 25.6% 123.9 3,400

Manteca City of San Joaquin River 32% 31.6% 28.7% 126.2 75,408

Tracy City of San Joaquin River 28% 30.7% 24.0% 128.8 85,146

City of Newman Water Department San Joaquin River 24% 26.0% 19.0% 130.1 10,668

Livingston City of San Joaquin River 32% 10.8% 14.3% 131.1 14,898

Los Banos, City of San Joaquin River 28% 25.8% 24.2% 134.1 37,168

Madera City of San Joaquin River 28% 29.7% 21.7% 134.9 63,961

Lodi City of Public Works Department San Joaquin River 32% 28.1% 22.4% 135.5 63,651

Turlock City of San Joaquin River 32% 27.1% 26.3% 142.8 71,181

Winton Water & Sanitary District San Joaquin River 36% 23.9% 16.3% 149.2 8,500

Riverbank City of San Joaquin River 32% 15.3% 27.3% 149.4 23,298

Oakdale City of San Joaquin River 32% 40.6% 31.7% 155.4 22,058

Modesto, City of San Joaquin River 36% 28.6% 16.4% 159.4 220,916

Merced City of San Joaquin River 36% 41.3% 36.8% 176.6 83,400

Atwater City of San Joaquin River 36% 35.5% 32.5% 187.3 29,500

Ripon City of San Joaquin River 36% 28.3% 22.5% 218.7 14,915

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 6 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Madera County San Joaquin River 36% 33.7% 29.3% 242.6 14,326

California Water Service Company East Los Angeles South Coast 8% 17.1% 17.2% 44.3 158,993

Vernon City of South Coast 8% 3.8% 6.6% 45.3 112

Huntington Park City of South Coast 8% 15.4% 16.3% 46.6 64,219

El Monte City of South Coast 8% 16.6% 18.8% 51.9 22,968

Golden State Water Company Florence Graham South Coast 8% 12.8% 12.7% 53.3 65,492

Oxnard City of South Coast 12% 20.0% 19.6% 54.4 196,720

Golden State Water Company Bell-Bell Gardens South Coast 8% 16.0% 16.5% 54.5 57,934

Seal Beach City of South Coast 8% 22.9% 27.1% 57.4 25,561

Compton City of South Coast 8% 13.5% 8.3% 59.2 81,963

Orchard Dale Water District South Coast 12% 20.8% 24.3% 59.6 25,605

California-American Water Company San Diego District South Coast 8% 27.7% 27.5% 59.6 95,358

Fountain Valley City of South Coast 20% 25.5% 27.0% 59.8 59,227

Sweetwater Authority South Coast 12% 25.4% 24.0% 60.7 191,500

Valley County Water District South Coast 16% 25.3% 26.2% 62.0 71,003

Inglewood City of South Coast 12% 17.7% 17.0% 62.3 86,418

Golden State Water Company Southwest South Coast 12% 15.1% 15.6% 62.4 271,677

Santa Ana City of South Coast 12% 20.4% 21.3% 62.6 332,005

San Gabriel Valley Water Company South Coast 16% 34.5% 23.8% 63.3 271,817

Golden State Water Company S San Gabriel South Coast 12% 15.0% 17.5% 64.1 27,656

City of Big Bear Lake, Dept of Water & Power South Coast 16% 18.5% 12.6% 64.7 25,628

Pomona City of South Coast 20% 26.9% 28.8% 65.1 152,419

San Diego City of South Coast 16% 24.1% 21.7% 65.4 1,314,290

South Gate City of South Coast 12% 14.7% 21.9% 65.4 96,057

Golden State Water Company Norwalk South Coast 12% 20.2% 17.0% 65.8 44,466

Golden State Water Company West Orange South Coast 16% 26.0% 27.6% 66.7 111,904

Hawthorne City of South Coast 16% 10.9% 11.1% 66.9 44,537

Golden State Water Company Artesia South Coast 16% 18.0% 19.8% 68.6 47,978

Port Hueneme City of South Coast 8% 20.6% 18.0% 68.6 21,555

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 7 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Irvine Ranch Water District South Coast 16% 16.6% 12.8% 69.2 387,773

Long Beach City of South Coast 16% 18.7% 18.6% 69.2 474,225

Golden State Water Company Culver City South Coast 16% 19.2% 20.5% 69.4 36,215

Montebello Land and Water Company South Coast 16% 18.7% 18.5% 69.6 32,219

Hemet City of South Coast 32% 24.8% 21.4% 70.3 29,982

Paramount City of South Coast 12% 18.6% 10.2% 71.0 55,051

La Palma City of South Coast 20% 26.8% 30.3% 72.1 15,896

Pico Rivera City of South Coast 16% 21.3% 21.6% 73.1 39,002

California Water Service Company Hermosa/Redondo South Coast 20% 19.9% 21.8% 73.3 95,853

San Buenaventura City of South Coast 16% 35.9% 25.4% 73.9 113,478

Santa Fe Springs City of South Coast 16% 25.9% 24.8% 74.5 18,199

Santa Monica City of South Coast 20% 22.6% 23.1% 76.0 93,283

Padre Dam Municipal Water District South Coast 20% 33.3% 34.8% 76.2 90,101

Big Bear City Community Services District South Coast 16% 19.9% 3.2% 76.6 12,411

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power South Coast 16% 19.0% 21.8% 77.0 4,016,064

California Water Service Company Dominguez South Coast 16% 15.9% 22.8% 77.7 142,283

Otay Water District South Coast 20% 27.3% 29.0% 78.1 217,800

Oceanside City of South Coast 20% 26.6% 27.3% 78.5 171,183

Helix Water District South Coast 20% 27.9% 28.0% 78.5 270,375

Mesa Water District South Coast 20% 23.6% 17.8% 78.7 108,000

Vista Irrigation District South Coast 20% 28.9% 29.4% 80.1 124,746

Rowland Water District South Coast 20% 18.3% 18.9% 80.4 62,106

Garden Grove City of South Coast 20% 24.3% 29.3% 80.4 177,020

Perris, City of South Coast 24% 27.2% 31.6% 80.4 9,000

El Segundo City of South Coast 20% 4.3% 3.0% 80.4 16,654

Manhattan Beach City of South Coast 20% 22.9% 23.2% 80.5 35,996

Lakeside Water District South Coast 20% 32.0% 33.6% 80.7 35,500

Bellflower-Somerset Mutual Water Company South Coast 20% 19.9% 20.7% 80.9 46,300

Westminster City of South Coast 20% 20.0% 20.1% 80.9 93,322

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 8 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Azusa City of South Coast 20% 24.6% 25.0% 81.1 110,000

Monterey Park City of South Coast 20% 18.7% 21.6% 81.2 62,183

San Gabriel County Water District South Coast 20% 25.0% 26.5% 81.7 45,000

Buena Park City of South Coast 20% 26.2% 31.5% 82.1 82,767

Golden State Water Company Placentia South Coast 24% 30.7% 29.9% 82.7 46,543

Glendale City of South Coast 20% 25.1% 24.5% 83.7 193,300

Downey City of South Coast 20% 24.6% 27.9% 83.9 111,931

Anaheim City of South Coast 20% 25.8% 23.7% 84.0 360,142

Lakewood City of South Coast 20% 29.1% 29.5% 84.3 59,081

Escondido City of South Coast 20% 33.1% 26.5% 84.6 134,053

Vallecitos Water District South Coast 24% 33.8% 39.6% 85.4 95,634

Lomita City of South Coast 20% 20.5% 17.2% 85.4 20,463

Colton, City of South Coast 20% 20.3% 22.0% 85.7 47,612

Golden State Water Company S Arcadia South Coast 24% 30.0% 29.9% 86.2 26,827

Huntington Beach City of South Coast 20% 25.5% 26.7% 86.6 196,041

Newport Beach City of South Coast 28% 22.1% 20.1% 87.9 66,219

Golden State Water Company Simi Valley South Coast 24% 37.1% 37.9% 88.1 43,351

Pico Water District South Coast 24% 24.8% 27.8% 88.4 25,284

San Bernardino County Service Area 70 South Coast 28% 28.1% 19.0% 88.6 11,407

Laguna Beach County Water District South Coast 24% 22.8% 24.5% 89.0 19,121

Sunny Slope Water Company South Coast 24% 29.4% 31.3% 89.5 30,611

Santa Paula City of South Coast 28% 30.0% 27.7% 90.0 30,009

Fullerton City of South Coast 28% 25.2% 27.1% 90.2 138,000

Norwalk City of South Coast 20% 18.3% 19.1% 92.1 18,361

San Clemente City of South Coast 24% 28.2% 30.0% 92.3 51,385

Chino City of South Coast 24% 24.3% 23.9% 93.3 78,073

San Fernando City of South Coast 24% 24.5% 27.3% 93.4 23,645

El Toro Water District South Coast 24% 26.6% 31.1% 93.8 48,628

South Coast Water District South Coast 24% 31.4% 30.0% 94.0 35,004

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 9 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Valencia Water Company South Coast 24% 36.9% 38.1% 95.1 118,224

Suburban Water Systems San Jose Hills South Coast 24% 27.3% 28.3% 96.3 178,500

Camarillo City of South Coast 20% 24.3% 25.1% 97.2 47,389

Whittier City of South Coast 20% 21.1% 21.7% 97.6 49,954

Moulton Niguel Water District South Coast 20% 24.1% 26.2% 98.0 172,068

Alhambra City of South Coast 24% 26.8% 27.1% 98.3 85,068

Burbank City of South Coast 24% 28.2% 30.5% 98.8 106,084

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 29.4% 38.9% 99.1 149,507

Carlsbad Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 26.7% 28.5% 99.4 84,838

San Gabriel Valley Fontana Water Company South Coast 28% 31.4% 35.1% 99.6 209,035

Monte Vista Water District South Coast 24% 28.3% 23.3% 99.7 56,039

La Habra City of Public Works South Coast 28% 24.3% 22.4% 101.3 63,118

Orange City of South Coast 28% 28.1% 29.7% 102.6 139,463

Eastern Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 21.0% 23.8% 102.9 539,410

Santa Margarita Water District South Coast 24% 29.3% 30.0% 103.6 156,949

Lincoln Avenue Water Company South Coast 28% 31.9% 32.3% 103.8 16,126

Rubidoux Community Service District South Coast 28% 22.7% 27.0% 104.3 32,000

Brea City of South Coast 24% 22.3% 32.6% 105.9 43,328

Suburban Water Systems Whittier/La Mirada South Coast 28% 27.1% 30.1% 106.4 115,000

San Juan Capistrano City of South Coast 28% 26.9% 27.7% 106.6 39,047

San Jacinto City of South Coast 32% 33.5% 33.3% 107.4 15,582

Pasadena City of South Coast 28% 24.2% 24.7% 107.5 166,482

Covina City of South Coast 28% 25.9% 27.8% 108.3 33,300

Ramona Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 33.8% 37.3% 108.4 36,564

South Pasadena City of South Coast 28% 31.5% 34.7% 108.8 25,899

Tustin City of South Coast 28% 30.0% 34.7% 109.2 67,700

Golden State Water Company San Dimas South Coast 28% 34.4% 33.9% 109.5 54,872

Lee Lake Water District South Coast 32% 35.2% 39.6% 111.5 15,543

Riverside City of South Coast 28% 26.1% 27.9% 114.1 299,626

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 10 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

San Bernardino City of South Coast 28% 30.7% 30.9% 115.2 198,163

Chino Hills City of South Coast 28% 29.1% 37.8% 115.2 77,596

Cerritos City of South Coast 28% 25.9% 26.8% 115.9 49,041

Ventura County Waterworks District No. 8 South Coast 28% 30.5% 32.8% 116.7 90,687

Thousand Oaks City of South Coast 28% 32.6% 33.7% 117.8 51,609

Rialto City of South Coast 28% 19.6% 22.5% 118.3 54,036

La Verne City of South Coast 32% 32.3% 34.0% 118.5 32,228

Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District South Coast 32% 34.1% 34.9% 119.5 29,955

Monrovia City of South Coast 28% 26.7% 34.0% 121.0 39,147

San Dieguito Water District South Coast 28% 22.3% 24.5% 121.2 37,168

Lake Hemet Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 41.0% 46.5% 121.5 52,914

Castaic Lake Water Agency Santa Clarita Water Division South Coast 32% 35.4% 37.6% 122.5 121,688

Triunfo Sanitation District / Oak Park Water Service South Coast 32% 38.1% 43.8% 124.9 12,200

Fallbrook Public Utility District South Coast 36% 28.1% 33.3% 125.6 34,894

Western Municipal Water District of Riverside South Coast 32% 29.2% 32.4% 127.4 96,139

Corona City of South Coast 28% 23.9% 27.9% 127.8 168,070

Jurupa Community Service District South Coast 28% 26.8% 30.9% 128.6 118,731

Trabuco Canyon Water District South Coast 28% 34.3% 37.0% 129.2 13,175

Fillmore City of South Coast 28% 27.0% 23.9% 129.3 15,222

Glendora City of South Coast 36% 35.7% 36.4% 129.6 51,463

Ventura County Waterworks District No 1 South Coast 32% 28.3% 29.2% 131.1 38,703

Sanger City of South Coast 28% 24.4% 21.6% 134.0 25,664

Golden State Water Company Claremont South Coast 32% 44.0% 42.3% 135.1 37,160

Loma Linda City of South Coast 32% 24.5% 25.8% 137.3 23,614

Casitas Municipal Water District South Coast 32% 29.3% 12.1% 138.1 9,603

Yorba Linda Water District South Coast 36% 41.6% 43.7% 139.6 72,500

Newhall County Water District South Coast 28% 31.7% 34.4% 139.7 45,036

Poway City of South Coast 32% 36.7% 35.7% 140.7 48,774

Olivenhain Municipal Water District South Coast 32% 32.9% 30.5% 142.3 78,713

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 11 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

California-American Water Company Los Angeles District South Coast 28% 31.2% 34.0% 143.1 102,889

California-American Water Ventura District South Coast 32% 28.4% 31.8% 143.1 62,144

East Valley Water District South Coast 28% 31.2% 24.2% 145.4 101,733

West Valley Water District South Coast 32% 22.7% 26.0% 154.5 73,836

Upland City of South Coast 36% 32.0% 33.0% 157.6 75,670

Beverly Hills City of South Coast 32% 20.4% 20.5% 161.0 42,157

Arcadia City of South Coast 36% 30.1% 33.5% 161.6 57,639

Rancho California Water District South Coast 36% 31.2% 35.7% 164.9 168,978

Valley Center Municipal Water District South Coast 36% 42.1% 49.3% 166.1 25,458

Rainbow Municipal Water District South Coast 36% 43.0% 55.3% 166.7 19,495

Norco City of South Coast 36% 27.4% 32.6% 167.0 25,891

Riverside Highland Water Company South Coast 36% 34.4% 36.6% 167.5 14,949

Las Virgenes Municipal Water District South Coast 36% 34.0% 36.2% 177.1 75,384

California Water Service Company Palos Verdes South Coast 36% 32.0% 34.8% 184.4 69,937

Rubio Canyon Land and Water Association South Coast 36% 30.0% 25.8% 186.4 9,600

Sierra Madre City of South Coast 32% 23.0% 19.3% 188.0 11,094

East Orange County Water District South Coast 36% 39.6% 41.8% 192.6 3,247

Yucaipa Valley Water District South Coast 36% 25.0% 23.3% 202.6 44,656

Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District South Coast 36% 27.0% 31.1% 203.1 43,111

California Water Service Company Westlake South Coast 36% 35.4% 39.0% 218.8 19,447

Golden State Water Company Cowan Heights South Coast 36% 38.7% 39.7% 232.2 7,254

Redlands City of South Coast 36% 25.1% 30.2% 235.4 77,852

Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 29 South Coast 36% 24.2% 25.0% 247.4 22,216

Valley Water Company South Coast 36% 31.8% 34.7% 267.2 9,900

Serrano Water District South Coast 36% 43.2% 43.6% 271.2 6,641

Santa Fe Irrigation District South Coast 36% 39.9% 38.0% 357.8 19,839

Crestline Village Water District South Lahontan 8% 24.0% 25.8% 52.1 7,565

San Bernardino County Service Area 64 South Lahontan 32% 35.2% 39.8% 53.4 14,031

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District South Lahontan 16% 34.1% 35.9% 62.0 21,052

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 12 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Mammoth Community Water District South Lahontan 20% 38.8% 31.2% 64.7 16,739

Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services District South Lahontan 32% 18.5% 23.0% 90.3 25,160

Golden State Water Company Barstow South Lahontan 24% 25.9% 18.9% 96.1 31,209

Adelanto City of South Lahontan 20% 14.7% 18.2% 97.4 28,723

Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company South Lahontan 28% 32.5% 32.9% 102.6 62,602

Rosamond Community Service District South Lahontan 28% 31.8% 33.8% 116.9 17,700

Palmdale Water District South Lahontan 32% 29.6% 30.2% 120.1 116,183

Victorville Water District South Lahontan 28% 27.8% 24.7% 126.9 125,896

Hesperia Water District City of South Lahontan 32% 24.9% 23.0% 133.1 91,627

California Water Service Company Antelope Valley South Lahontan 36% 45.0% 54.2% 135.3 3,391

Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 40 South Lahontan 32% 36.6% 27.4% 148.6 207,304

Indian Wells Valley Water District South Lahontan 36% 24.7% 18.8% 202.7 31,120

Quartz Hill Water District South Lahontan 36% 38.4% 35.2% 211.1 20,352

Lemoore City of Tulare Lake 32% 23.2% 34.6% 79.0 25,281

Delano City of Tulare Lake 24% 22.8% 18.0% 81.4 54,318

Reedley City of Tulare Lake 24% 23.4% 22.4% 87.5 24,194

Arvin Community Services District Tulare Lake 28% 32.3% 23.1% 90.3 20,499

Wasco City of Tulare Lake 36% 24.8% 22.1% 114.4 26,159

Tehachapi, City of Tulare Lake 28% 30.0% 26.3% 117.5 8,839

California Water Service Company Kern River Valley Tulare Lake 28% 18.8% 21.5% 117.6 5,595

West Kern Water District Tulare Lake 28% 18.2% 1.6% 122.8 21,181

Lamont Public Utility District Tulare Lake 28% 27.9% 23.5% 127.8 20,009

California Water Service Company Selma Tulare Lake 32% 40.7% 39.6% 127.8 25,065

Pinedale County Water District Tulare Lake 36% 27.6% 26.0% 128.1 16,735

Porterville City of Tulare Lake 32% 35.0% 34.5% 130.3 61,946

Fresno City of Tulare Lake 28% 28.0% 22.3% 137.4 520,159

California Water Service Company Bakersfield Tulare Lake 32% 34.6% 36.3% 140.3 279,143

California Water Service Company Visalia Tulare Lake 32% 25.1% 21.6% 144.8 139,027

Kerman, City of Tulare Lake 32% 26.0% 21.4% 155.2 14,359

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 13 of 14

September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)

389 suppliers reporting for September

Conservation

Standard

Cumulative

Percent Saved (as compared

to 2013)

Monthly

Percent Saved(as compared

to Sep-13)

Estimated

Monthly

R-GPCD

Total

Population

Served

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Cumulative Savings

(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)

Exeter City of Tulare Lake 36% 32.3% 27.9% 155.4 10,572

Hanford City of Tulare Lake 28% 11.0% 15.5% 155.5 57,050

Coalinga City of Tulare Lake 32% 31.8% 19.2% 168.7 16,529

Shafter City of Tulare Lake 36% 29.1% 23.8% 177.2 19,100

Clovis City of Tulare Lake 36% 32.0% 27.6% 180.6 108,227

Bakman Water Company Tulare Lake 36% 31.9% 25.8% 186.9 16,756

East Niles Community Service District Tulare Lake 36% 30.7% 26.0% 189.6 31,772

Corcoran, City of Tulare Lake 36% 31.8% 25.5% 191.5 24,154

Oildale Mutual Water Company Tulare Lake 36% 30.6% 33.8% 192.1 33,163

Kingsburg, City of Tulare Lake 36% 40.1% 44.5% 194.0 11,685

Bakersfield City of Tulare Lake 36% 31.5% 29.0% 207.9 143,148

Vaughn Water Company Tulare Lake 36% 28.9% 24.2% 359.0 30,861

* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.

Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 14 of 14

top related