shareholder activism - realizing abnormal stock returns march 11 webinar

Post on 18-Nov-2014

110 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Haven Financial ServicesIndependent Research Event

March 11, 2010 Webinar

Shareholder Activism: Realizing Abnormal Stock Returns

For Additional Information Contact:

Cory Wolf, Director of Operations & MarketingHaven Financial Servicesa division of APB Financial Group

212-293-3475cwolf@hfs-llc.com

“Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards”Does Activism Increase Shareowner Returns?

Jon Lukomnik

Program Director, IRRC Institute Webinar, March 11, 2010

Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards• Why the study: There has been a significant rise in activism resulting in “hybrid boards”– 18 in 2005

– 45 in 2008

Source: Schor, Michael and Greenwood, Robin Marc, "Investor Activism and Takeovers," available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1003792.

Activist 13D Filings

0

40

80

120

160

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Hedge FundNon-Hedge FundTotal

Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards• Looked at 120 hybrid boards, 2005‐2008

• Activists gained board representation in 75% of companies targeted

Method of Resolution

2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 TotalSettlement 13 24 18 36 91 72 % 77 % 69 % 80 % 76 %Shareholder vote 5 7 8 9 29 28 % 23 % 31 % 20 % 24 %

Total 18 31 26 45 120 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %Year-over-Year increase/(decrease) 72 % (16)% 73 %Increase vs. 2005 totals 72 % 44 % 150 %

Number of Contests Percentage of Contests

Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards

• Companies in which activists gained board seats outperformed by 1660 basis points (16.6%) from the date of the contest through a year after election date

• There was dispersion in the results– 60% outperformed, 40% underperformed

“Contest effect” accounted for more than half of abnormal return

Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards

• Excess returns decrease over time

• For companies with 39 months of history (contest period plus 3 years), excess return was 17.8%. 

• However, excess return for 3 years post contest (therefore excluding contest effect) was actually negative: ‐6.6%

Caution:Small sample size (n=15) for 3‐year companies

Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards

• Outperformance was associated with level of ownership by activist– 67.7% excess return when activist owned >10% of the shares entering the contest

– Modest outperformance when activist owned 5‐10%

– No outperformance when activist owned <5%

Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards

• CEO left company in 49%  of cases– Similar to overall rate in America– However, 15% were dismissed; 3x overall rate

• New chairman: 21%• Board declassified: 13%• Board size changed: 12%• Other common governance changes: Split CEO/Chair 8%; 

Majority vote 6%, Redeemed poison pill 6%. 

24% of the 2005‐2007 companies were sold (1.8x market).Surprisingly, when a sale was an explicit insurgent goal, a 

sale was marginally less likely.No evidence of systemic short‐term bias overall.

Background: Why it works• Back to basics: What is excess return? 

– Alpha plus a residual, with alpha defined as the expected non‐market excess

– Most value‐added strategies focus on alpha, since it would appear that deviation from expectations can’t be managed

“Before the fact, the best guess is that [r] will be zero. After the fact, it almost certainly will not be. Unexpected good news will cause [r] to be positive, while unexpected bad 

news will cause it to be negative”‐‐William Sharpe

Background: Why It Works

• Activism works on both alpha and residual– Alpha through security selection– Implementation tries to “create unexpected good news”to make [r] positive

• Causes market to focus on what activist sees in company• Raises possibility of value realization

– Results in market re‐rating as possible value realization becomes investment thesis

– Consistent with contest effect and short‐term re‐rating– Can be thought of a similar to merger/take‐over bid. 

• Activist involvement raises value of target to maximal fair value, with only implementation gap remaining in valuation.

• Hence importance of “contest effect”

“Effectiveness of Hybrid Boards” is available at no cost.www.irrcinstitute.org

Please go to the web site and click on “projects”Feel free to sign up for notice of future IRRC Institute studies

Jon LukomnikProgram DirectorIRRC Institute

CATALYST INVESTMENT RESEARCH

Damien Park, Managing PartnerJon Heller, Partner

About Hedge Fund Solutions, LLC

Hedge Fund Solutions is comprised of highly skilled and seasoned professionals, providing deep core competencies in advising management and investors associated with

undervalued public companies involving activist investors

Activist Investing Specialists

Consulting

Investment Research

EducationInstitutional Investors | Public Companies

• Proxy Campaign Management• Analyze Value Gaps & Vulnerabilities• Investor Profiling & Intelligence• Corporate Governance Improvement• Stakeholder Communications• Investor Outreach & Targeting• Settlement Negotiations

• Daily Activist Email Alerts• Weekly Analysis (FREE)• Company-Specific In-depth Analysis• Quarterly Buying & Selling Analysis• Special Reports• Access to Specialists & Activist Investors

Catalyst Investment Research™

Institutional Investors | Public Companies

• The Shareholder Activism Report & Shareholder Activism Resource Portal

• Interactive Case Study• Annual Hedge Fund Activism &

Shareholder Value Summit• Various Publications• The Official Activist Investing Blog™

Daily: Email Alerts Weekly: Catalyst Equity Research Report™ Catalyst Investment Research™ Report

Special Reports

Catalyst Investment Research™

Quarterly Buying AnalysisTop 50 Activists

Catalyst Investment Research™ ReportRESEARCH PROCESS

Step 1: Identify Research Candidates- Activist Investor Contacts- Regulatory Filings- Proprietary Screening

Step 2: Weekly Review Process- Top 25 Candidates- Examine Activist- Examine Company- Situation Analysis/Timing

Step 3: Engage- Company- Activist- Others: Investors, Proxy FirmsLegal, PR, IR, etc…

Step 4: Build Report/Distribute

Catalyst Investment Research™ Report

Catalyst Investment Research™ ReportRECENT EXAMPLE

Nov. 11 2009Activist Investors Clinton Group &

Spotlight Advisors Start Buying

Dec. 22 2009Activists Disclose 5.7% Ownership

Dec. 22 2009Activist Discloses Concerns:

Rigidity of business strategyOperational issues

Returns on invested capitalExecutive compensation

Board & management accountabilityManagement – in general

Dec. 25 2009CIR Weekly Report

Dec. 28 – Jan. 5Discussions w/ activist & others

Jan. 13 2010CIR Research Issued

$17.27/share

Feb. 19 2010CIR Weekly Report

March 4 2010Settlement Agreement

March 8 2010CIR Research Note Issued$23.17/share

OUTCOME:Approx. 2 Months36% Return

Catalyst Investment Research™ ReportSAMPLING OF SUCCESSFUL CALLS

Company: Tier Technologies, Inc. (TIER)Activist Investor(s): Discovery Capital & Parthenon InvestorsResearch Issued: March 4, 2009Results: 60% increase in share value within 4 months

Company: Consolidated Tomoka Land Co. (CTO)Activist Investor(s): Wintergreen AdvisersResearch Issued: April 8, 2009Results: 49% increase in share value within 6 months

4 Months60% Increase

6 Months49% Increase

Company: Tecumseh Products Company (TECUA)Activist Investor(s): Herrick FoundationResearch Issued: April 24, 2009Results: 47% increase in share value within 1 month;

78% Increase in share value within 5 months

Company: Chemed Corp. (CHE)Activist Investor(s): MMI InvestorsResearch Issued: May 8, 2009Results: 17% increase in share value within 6 months

1 Month47%Increase

5 Months78% Increase

6 Months17% Increase

Company: Enzon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ENZN)Activist Investor(s): DellaCamera Capital ManagementResearch Issued: June 10, 2009Results: 41% increase in share value within 6 months

6 Months41% Increase

Situation: Special Report on Activist Investor Steel PartnersThe distribution of in-kind securities to LPs on July 15 caused atemporary but dramatic reduction in value at a few portfolio companies.

Research Issued: July 20, 2009Results: Avg. 79% increase in share value within 1 month

1 Month79% Increase

NEW – March 2010The Shareholder Activism Report &

Shareholder Activism Resource Portal

In Collaboration with Hedge Fund Solutions and The Conference Board, Inc.

Damien J. Parkdpark@hedgerelations.com215-325-0514

Jon Hellerjheller@hedgerelations.com215-860-3605

www.hedgerelations.com

For Additional Information Contact:

top related