significance of the solar roadmap for policy and decision
Post on 11-Feb-2022
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Energy Policy & Legislative Framework• The Integrated Resource Plan 2010-2030• RE IPP Procurement Process• Solar Technology Resource and Options
– PV – CSP
2
– Solar Water Heating• Solar Energy Technology Roadmap• Conclusion
UNDERLYING POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
• White Paper on Energy Policy of the Republic of Sou th Africa December 1998 – “EWP” o Ensuring the implementation of economic feasible technologies and
applications.o Ensuring that an equitable level of national resources is invested in
renewable technologies, given their potential and compared to investments in other energy supply options.
o Addressing constraints on the development of the renewable industry.
• White Paper on Renewable Energy Policy of the Repub lic of
3
• White Paper on Renewable Energy Policy of the Repub lic of South Africa of November 2003 – “REWP” o Provides for a target of 10 000 GWh of renewable energy to contribute
to final energy consumption by 2013; to be produced mainly from biomass, wind, solar and small-scale hydro energy systems.
UNDERLYING POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
Energy Act, Act No. 34 of 2008• This Act seeks to ensure that diverse energy resources are available,
in sustainable quantities and at affordable prices, to the South African economy in support of economic growth and poverty alleviation, taking into account environmental management requirements and interactions amongst economic sectors, in order to provide for energy planning, increased generation and consumption of renewable energ ies
• A Bill to establish an Independent System Market Operator is under consideration at Cabinet level
4
INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN 2010-2030
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) 2010-2030• This is a “living” plan , which will be updated on an ongoing basis to reflect the
changing needs of South Africa and to learn from the inevitable changes in our economical, social and technological environment.
• Its primary objective is to determine long-term electricity demand and detail how this should be met in terms of the types of sources for generation, timing and cost.
• Government directed that the IRP must seek to find a balance between these key objectives:
6
key objectives:
� Affordability
� Reducing carbon emissions ( Towards a Green Economy )
� Water conservation
� Localisation
� Regional development
� The IRP must balance economic, social and environmental objectives.
� It should provide affordable energy:
� while ensuring security of supply;
� While providing opportunities for
IRP 2010-2030: BALANCING THE TENSIONS BETWEEN OBJECTIVES
7
� While providing opportunities for the creation of local industry clusters;
� and helping to achieve the emission targets committed to in Copenhagen.
WISE COMPROMISES REQUIRED
IRP MUST CONSIDER REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ENERGY FUTURE – 2030
GABON
KENYA
TANZANIA
ANGOLA
DR CONGO
GEO-THERMAL
ZAMBIA
BOTSWANA
NAMIBIA
SWAZILANDSWAZILANDSWAZILANDSWAZILAND
CSPPV
8
DECREASING COSTS OF RENEWABLES ALLOW FOR A HIGHER RENEWABLES SHARE AT THE SAME TOTAL SYSTEM COSTRevised Balanced Scenario and Policy-Adjusted IRP in comparison
Total additional new capacity (not committed) until 2030 in GW
20
15
10
Solar PV8,4
9,6
17,8
25
Total additional new capacity (not committed) until 2030 in GW
9,6
20
15
10
11,4
25
Before consultation process:Revised Balanced Scenario (RBS)
After consultation process:Policy-Adjusted IRP
Subject to later revision
16% 25% 9% 5% 15% 30% 15% 23% 6% 6% 9% 42%Share of total new GW
5
10
0
Wind
CSP1,0
Peak -OCGT
Coal
3,9
9,6
6,3
3,0
8,4
Renew-ables
Nuclear Gas -CCGT
2,42,6
6,6
Hydro
1,93,35
Nuclear
9,6
Coal
6,3
Gas -CCGT
Hydro
10
0Renew-ables
Peak -OCGT
5,8
5,0
1,3Own build Binding
10,1 0,0 0,05 0,0 1,0 1,0 10,1 0,0 0,05 0,0 1,0 1,0Committednew builds
35,5 1,8 2,1 0,0 2,4 0,0Existing fleet (2010)
35,5 1,8 2,1 0,0 2,4 0,0
Import
Import
65% 20% 5% 1% < 0,1% 9%65,5% 20% 6% 0,8% 0,2% 7,5%
90% 5% 5% 0% < 0,1% 0% 90% 5% 5% 0% < 0,1% 0%Energy share
in 2010
in 2030
ΣΣΣΣ = 260TWh
ΣΣΣΣ = 454TWh
9
CARBON INTENSITY REDUCED BY ~34% WHILE COAL AND NUCLEAR ARE STILL THE BACKBONE OF ENERGY SUPPLY How the Policy-adjusted IRP would affect the mix of power generation by 2030
100
Hydro
Wind
CSP
PV
Capacity installed EoY in GW1
80
Sources of energy supply Energy mix
400
500Electric energy supplied in TWh p.a.
Nuclear
Hydro
Wind
CSP
PVCarbon free TWh'sin 2030(34%)
RE TWh's in 2030(14%)
40
20
0
Coal
CCGT
OCGT
Nuclear
Hydro60
20302025202020152010
0
100
200
300
Coal
CCGT/OCGT
Nuclear
20302025202020152010
912 g/kWh 600 g/kWh
-34%
CO2intensity
(34%)
1. Pumped storage capacity of 1,4 GW in 2010 and 2,7 GW in 2030 is not included since it is a net energy user
AFFORDABILITY & COMPETITIVENESS MUST NOT BE COMPROMISED
2
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
c/k
Wh
(2
00
9 R
ea
l)
Eskom ave prices (2009 REAL)
Area of Prices for
Energy Intensive Industries in
China and India
Area of Prices for
IP 2010
11
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
19
70
19
72
19
74
19
76
19
78
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
20
04
20
06
20
08
20
10
20
12
20
14
20
16
20
18
20
20
20
22
20
24
20
26
20
28
20
30
c/k
Wh
(2
00
9 R
ea
l)
- China & India Prices by Frost & Sullivan
- RSA Historice Price Path - Eskom
- IRP Prices by DoE IRP TTT
CO2 emissions
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
CO
2 E
mis
sio
ns
(Mt/
an
nu
m)
CO
2 em
issi
ons
in M
t p.a
.BOTH RBS AND POLICY-ADJUSTED IRP REACH EMISSION TARGET
3
12
200
220
240
260
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
20
30
Copenhagen -Low Copenhagen - Range Base Case Revised Balanced Policy-adjusted IRP
CO
2 em
issi
ons
in M
t p.a
.
TOTAL WATER USAGE IS DECREASING UNTIL 2030, AND WATER-USAGE INTENSITY IS REDUCED BY ~60%Development of water usage and water-usage intensity
300
350
400
Water consumption in billion litres p.a.
4
13
200
250
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030
Base Case
Revised Balanced Scenario
Policy-Adjusted IRP
1,3 l/kWh 0,52 l/kWh0,94 l/kWh
-60%
Water-usage intensity of Policy-Adjusted IRP
LONG LEAD TIMES FOR POWER GENERATORS & RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRE TIMELY FIRM COMMITMENTS
New build optionsCoal
(PF, FBC, imports, own
build)
Nuclear Import hydro Gas – CCGT Peak – OCGT Wind CSP Solar PV
MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3002013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3002014 5001 0 0 0 0 400 0 3002015 5001 0 0 0 0 400 0 3002016 0 0 0 0 0 400 100 3002017 0 0 0 0 0 400 100 3002018 0 0 0 0 0 4004 1004 30042018 0 0 0 0 0 4004 1004 3004
2019 250 0 0 2373 0 4004 1004 3004
2020 250 0 0 2373 0 400 100 3002021 250 0 0 2373 0 400 100 3002022 250 0 1 1432 0 805 400 100 3002023 250 1 600 1 1832 0 805 400 100 3002024 250 1 600 2832 0 0 800 100 3002025 250 1 600 0 0 805 1 600 100 1 0002026 1 000 1 600 0 0 0 400 0 5002027 250 0 0 0 0 1 600 0 5002028 1 000 1 600 0 474 690 0 0 5002029 250 1 600 0 237 805 0 0 1 0002030 1 000 0 0 948 0 0 0 1 000Total 6 250 9 600 2 609 2 370 3 910 8 400 1 000 8 400
Firm commitment necessary now
Final commitment in IRP 2012
1. Built, owned & operated by IPPs 2. Commitment necessary due to required high-voltage infrastructure, which has long lead time 3. Commitment necessary due to required gas infrastructure, which has long lead time 4. Possibly required grid upgradehas long lead time and thus makes commitment to power capacity necessary
FROM IRP TO IMPLEMENTATION: SOUTH AFRICA INTRODUCES A RENEWABLE ENERGY INDEPENDENT
POWER PRODUCER (IPP) BIDDING PROCESS IN AUGUST 2011
TARGET: 3 725 MW BY 2016
15
Procurement documents
• Part A: General Requirements and Rules• Part B: Qualification Criteria• Part C: Economic Development
Request for Proposals
• Wind PPA• Solar PPAPower Purchase
PROCUREMENT PROCESS
• Solar PPA• Small hydro• CSP PPA
Power Purchase Agreement
• Contract between the IPP and the Department• Obligation for IPP to deliver on economic development• In buyer default – Department to pay the IPP
Implementation Agreement
RFP KEY EVALUATION CRITERIA
Economic Development Elements Weighting
Job Creation 25%
Local Content 25%
Ownership 15%
Management Control 5%
•The request for proposals (RFP) provides for a 70/30 split on price and economic development as per the exemption from the Preferential Procurement Policy Frameworks Act (PPFA).•Breakdown of the 30% weighting on economic development is as indicated below
Management Control 5%
Preferential Procurement 10%
Development 5%
Socio-Economic Development 15%
Total 100%
Total points 30 points
PREFERRED BIDDERS SALIENT TERMSSOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC
Bid Window 2 Bid Window 1Price: Fully Indexed (Average Rand per MWh)
R 1 645 R 2 758
MW allocation 417 MW 632 MW
Total Project Cost (R’million) R12 048 R21 937
19
Local Content Value (R’million) R5 727 R6 261
Local Content % 47.5% 28.5%
Job Creation : Construction (People) 4 557 10 386
Job Creation : Operations (People) 194 221
PREFERRED BIDDER SALIENT TERMSCONCENTRATED SOLAR POWER
Bid Window 2 Bid Window 1Price: Fully Indexed (Average Rand per MWh)
R 2 512 R 2 686
MW allocation 50 MW 150 MW
Total Project Cost (R’million) R 4 483 R 11 365
20
Local Content Value (R’million) R 1 638 R 2 391
Local Content % 36.5% 21.0%
Job Creation : Construction (People) 662 1 165
Job Creation : Operations (People) 50 70
OPTIONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA (1)
• IRP 2010-2030 allows for more than 50% of the current
renewable energy (RE) allocation for electricity generation to
solar technology (PV + CSP = 9 400MW).
• Parallel to the above, the Department is investigating the
feasibility of establishing a 5 GW solar corridor from the
Northern Cape.
24
Northern Cape.
• Due to the magnitude of the project, it was decided that the
project wouldbe rolled out in different phases andit will be
technology neutral.
ENERGY OPTIONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA (2)
• The Eskom site for a 100 MW concentrated solar power(CSP) demonstration plant is situated alongside the sitewhere the first phase of the 1 000 MW plant will beestablished.
• This demonstration plant will be based on Central Receivertechnology with molten salt storage, and will be suitable forbase load application.
• Eskom’s expansion requires large-scale diversification intolower carbon technologies and this diversification will bebased on the lessons learned from this demonstration project.
25
SOLAR ENERGY OPTIONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA (3)
• Installation of solar water heating (SWH) systems with a targetof 1 million by 2014 is underway. Government has allocatedR4,7 billion from the 2012/13 -2014/15 financial years towardsthe realisation of this target.
• The national SWH programme has both electricity demandside management andsocio-economic objectives as it seeksto –• reduce energy consumption by installing quality solar water
heating systems in residential, commercial and industrial
26
heating systems in residential, commercial and industrialareas;
• defer building of further power stations (other than theplanned ones);
• contribute towards SA’s RE 2013 target;• contribute towards government’s socio-economic imperatives
(e.g. job creation, improved livelihoods, service delivery, etc.)• provide easy access to hot water services to marginalised
communities.
SOLAR TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING POLICIES AND PLANS
• Various key stakeholders within and outside government have been advocating for very concrete, time-bound implementation plans for the IRP on renewables, which have been partially addressed by the current IRP procurement process.
• Furthermore, the New Growth Path targets 300 000 additional direct jobs by 2020 from Green Industries; of these, 80 000 are to be direct jobs by 2020 from Green Industries; of these, 80 000 are to be in manufacturing and the rest in construction, operations andmaintenance.
• Job creation is expected to rise to well over 400 000 by 2030.
• The IDC has set aside R22,4 billion for investment in green projects over the coming five years.
27
SOLAR TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING POLICIES AND PLANS
• The IRP 2010-2030 has set the Research Agenda for the 2012 review to be led by DST as follows:
• An Outlook up to 2050 – implications of further greenhouse-gas reduction in Distributed Generation (DG) and off-grid generation (island grids).
• primary energy mix for all sectors on the power sector.• Grid integration of RE including smart grids and storage.• Technology roadmaps identify a growth path for each
technology, identify milestones for technology development, financing, policy and public engagement that need to be achieved to realise the technology’s full potential - IEA.
• Roadmap therefore complements the IRP within the period 2010-2030 without dwelling too much on specifics of each technology save for accommodating learning rates.
28
CONCLUSION
Given the above context, we believe that the solar technology roadmap can support policy goals and existing plans by –
o identifying and addressing technology-specific barriers;
o highlighting policies and incentives that would be necessary to
accelerate deployment;
o paving the way for localisation efforts so as to enable government to
achieve the New Growth Path aspirations;
29
achieve the New Growth Path aspirations;
o directing increased Research, Development and Demonstration funding for new technologies;
o highlighting key challenges, recommending appropriate actions, setting priorities and proposing optimum levels of intervention.
top related