sip3 update - niso update, ala annual chicago 2013

National Information Standards Organization

SIP 3 Standards Development

Status Report

June 2013

1

Brief SIP History

• Originally developed by 3M in mid 1990s for self-checkout devices

• Although owned by 3M, widespread use for other related applications (authentication, print management, self checkout, etc.)

• SIP2 released in 2006 – introduced new messages and additional functions

• ILS (and other vendors) adopted SIP2 but needed to write local (non-standard) enhancements and extensions for particular applications (notably, item-based payments)

2

SIP3 initiative

• 3M began early discussion on SIP3 as early as 2007-2008

• Early 3M draft was used as working document by 3M-based working group; input from library industry, 2011-2012

• Summer 2012 – 3M donates SIP to NISO for formal standards process and future development

• Summer-Fall 2012: NISO organizes SIP3 Working Group to move SIP3 through standardization process

3

SIP3 Working Group

John Bodfish, OCLC – co-chair

Ted Koppel, Auto-Graphics co-chair

Approx. 11 active members, several less-than-active members

Includes:Biblionix

Bibliotecha

Ceridwen

Envisionware

Ex Libris

Polaris

TLC

4

SIP3 Working Group – Activity Goals

• Protocol Document

• Corrections, Omissions, Additions, resolve ambiguities

• Create Implementers Guide, scope notes, application hints

• Privacy issues

• Information sharing between partners, particularly cross-borders

• Plan for and recommend maintenance agency and update/enhancement process

• SIP3 and relationship to NCIP

5

Status report

October 2012

Began meeting, set agenda

November-December 2012

Assembled lists of known errors/omissions/ambiguities. Identified approx. 75, split between errors in the 3M draft documentation and errors/inconsistencies in the actual protocol

January 2013

Resolved almost all of the documentation issues and about 1/3 of protocol issues (low-hanging fruit)

6

Status Report 2

January 2013-present

• Currently Addressing more difficult issues

• Strawman documents to lay out possible solutions

• Sometimes required subcommittees to address

• Recent examples

• Require HTTPS?

• How to deal with multiple languages – client server?

• Dealing with SIP2 limitations (field size on 63/64 message, for example, for consortia)

7

NCIP and SIP3

Exact relationship will eventually require NCIP and SIP3 joint meetings

General guidelines as of now:

• SIP3 will generally be pointed to intra-library applications

• NCIP will generally be pointed at inter-library (and external to the library) applications

• Complementary toolset and messages

• Idea is that developer will pick the best tool for the job

8

Working group

• Currently meets bi-weekly

• Subcommittees as needed

• Planned completion: End of Year 2013 or earlier

9