social networking issues students & staff presented by andy fugitt the center for education law,...
Post on 27-Dec-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Social Networking IssuesStudents & Staff
Presented by Andy FugittThe Center for Education Law,
Inc.August 26, 2011
What is social networking and how big a deal is it? On-line service or platform focused on building
relationships or networks A person wishing to communicate with friends
and family or meet new people can register with a site and create a “profile.”
Facebook – over 750 million active worldwide users [up from 500 million 6 months ago]; about 250 million in the U.S. [about 80% of U.S. population]
250 million total users via mobile device [who are 2x as active]
Continued -
Twitter – Over 200 million users LinkedIn – Over 100 millions users MySpace – about 70 million active users Blogging
Blogging
Short for “web log” An on-line diary which usually accompanies
article or picture Or create your own: www.blogspot.com Blog entries may include text, photos, links to
on-line information, video and audio “Virtually” anywhere that information is
provided or shared on-line may serve as a platform for bloggers
Rules for blogging?
Social Networking Issues – Teachers
Even where staff not acting inappropriately – misuse of time?
Typical situation: inappropriate behavior and comments - drinking and sarcastic comments about work
Worst case scenario: sites have been used to invade student boundaries and groom students
Less scandalous but still a problem: revealing confidential student or employee information
At the far extreme – Virginia butt-print artist
What should we be concerned about?
Major concerns: Public/parents/co-workers/students viewing
inappropriate pictures and comments [and is there any connection between the pictures or comments and the school or classroom?]
Teachers’ interactions with students might not be appropriate- Social networking sites often involve casual discussions about personal matters which are sometimes very frank
Continued -
- Peer-like interactions with students can be a boundary invasion which may be harmless or may be part of a grooming strategy
Stories:
Teacher suspended for Facebook picture with stripper –
Teacher suspended/reassigned for Facebook comments about students – Raleigh, N.C.
Teacher terminated for calling students “germbags” on Facebook and for referring to parents as arrogant and snobby – Mass.
Teacher suspended for blog postings critical of students – Pa.
NLRB case
So What Can We Do About Teachers?
Where do we draw the line in terms of on-line conduct which warrants discipline?
Assuming there is no violation of law, what is the impact at school?
•Does the conduct make it difficult/impossible for the teacher to do his or her job?
Probationary teacher – cause Career teacher – moral turpitude?
•Admonish to use other statutory grounds
Teachers And The First Amendment
Teachers have a constitutional right to speak as a citizen on matters of public concern
Can the teacher’s expressions be “fairly considered as relating to a matter of political, social, or other concern to the community”
If the speech is on a matter of public concern, the teacher’s interest as a citizen in commenting on the matter must be weighed against the interest of the school district in promoting the efficiency of its operations
Continued -
Employee’s personal dissatisfaction with job probably not a matter of public concern; allegations that public funds being misspent may be
Public employees aren’t protected by the First Amendment when they make statements pursuant to their official job duties even on subjects of public concern
Students and Social Networking –What Should We Be Concerned About?
“Cyberbullying” and harassment of fellow students or school staff
Access to predators Unsafe disclosure of personal information Addiction to on-line activity Risky sexual behavior Dangerous on-line communities Other conduct which may be disruptive to school
activity Posting of inappropriate or incriminating
information
Stories
Student disciplined for creating a parody MySpace profile page of her middle school principal, off-campus on a home computer that contained vulgar, lewd and false statements about the principal – J.S. v. Blue Mountain S.D/Layshock v. Hermitage S.D. – Pennsylvania- 3rd Circuit
High school student sends an instant message on his home computer to a classmate on her home computer saying that he was going to get a gun and kill certain students. Threat reported. Student suspended for rest of year; claims First Amendment rights violated. D.J.M. v. Hannibal PS; Missouri – 8th Cir.
Continued -
High school student [K.K.] creates internet chat group [S.A.S.H] using home computer, invites other school friends. Becomes apparent purpose of group is to target one individual student, S.N. Another student makes derogatory comments about S.N., including that she has herpes. K.K does not make posts, but makes comments approving of derogatory posts. Short term suspension; Kowalski v. Berkley CS; 4th Cir. W. Va.
Student’s First Amendment Rights
Schools have greater control over “school-sponsored” speech [i.e., student publications] than off-campus speech
Lewd or offensive speech occurring off-campus may be protected by First Amendment; such speech occurring on-campus is not
Students may be disciplined for off-campus speech which actually disrupts school activities or which gives school officials well founded belief that such disruption will occur
Cyberbullying
Oklahoma law prohibits harassment intimidation and bullying of a student by way of electronic communication –including by means of a computer
Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying Schools must adopt a policy that prohibits any
gesture, written or verbal expression, electronic communication, or physical act that a reasonable person should know will harm another student, damage another student’s property, place another student in reasonable fear of harm to the student’s person or damage to the student’s property, or insult or demean any student or group of students in such a way as to disrupt or interfere with the school’s educational mission or the education of any student.
Relation to school In order to fall under the school’s policy, the
communication need not originate at school or with school equipment if the communication is specifically directed at students or at school personnel and concerns harassment, intimidation, or bullying at school.
The statute also states that “nothing in this act shall be construed to impose a specific liability on any school district.”
Finally, schools must establish a procedure for the investigation of bullying.
What you can do Discuss professionalism with school
employees, and the reasons for maintaining boundaries with students.
Ensure that at least one person on the administrative team is proficient with common online social networking sites.
Screen prospective employees by running a quick check on the major online social networking sites.
Make sure students are aware of the consequences of engaging in cyberbullying.
What’s On The Horizon
District Policies/regulations which restrict staff ability to communicate with students via public social networking sites – Virginia
OK Senate Bill 152
Thank you for listening!
Any Questions?
top related