spatial analysis of geochemical data

Post on 13-Jan-2016

43 Views

Category:

Documents

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Spatial analysis of geochemical data. Shawn Laffan. Hotspot identification. Where are the regions of excess element abundance? Greater than expected Anomalously high Where are the regions of less than expected abundance?. Hotspot identification. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Spatial analysis of geochemical data

Shawn Laffan

Hotspot identification

• Where are the regions of excess element abundance?• Greater than expected• Anomalously high

• Where are the regions of less than expected abundance?

Hotspot identification

• Need quantitative comparison within and between data sets

• Looking for clusters

• Moving window analyses• Geographically local

Tobler’s First Law

• That everything is related to everything else, but that near things are more related than those far apart

Hotspot identification

• Spatial scale• Spatial extent• Spatial non-stationarity• Significance

Getis-Ord hotspot statistic

Getis-Ord hotspot statistic

Sum weighted values

in window

Subtract sum of weights * mean

(expected value)

Divide by standard deviation andcorrect for weights used in window

Getis-Ord hotspot statistic

• Positive for samples that are, on average, above the mean

• Negative if below the mean• Z-score

• >+1.96 significant hotspot• <-1.96 significant coldspot

Choice of weights (sample window)• Binary

• Resultant surfaces can have abrupt changes

• Continuous• Smoother surfaces

Gaussian – asymptotes to zero

IDW - asymptotes to zero

Bisquare – decays to zero

Gi* analyses

• Fe, Ni, Pb, Cu, Li, Cr, Ce/Li, Cr/Fe• log10 scaled• 1 km resolution rasters• Maximum value if >1 point in a cell

Gi* analyses

• Bisquare weights with 4 bandwidths• 2, 3, 4 & 5 km

• Identified “optimal” scale at each location • Bandwidth with most extreme Gi* score

Visual comparison with lithology and landform

• Landform (terrain): • Slope gradient • Longitudinal curvature

Rate of change of slope gradient

+ve = Convex up = spur line

-ve = Concave up = break of slope

0 = Planar

• Circular analysis windowsRadii: 1 & 5 km (local & regional)

• SRTM 3 arc second DEM

Conclusions

• Hotspots broadly consistent with lithology

• Weak association with landform• and terrain is controlled by lithology...

• Finer detail possibly due to other causes• e.g. Pb & anthropogenic activities

Jenny’s CLORPT model

• Soil = f (Climate,Organic,Relief,Parent material,Time)

Future

• Use alternate expected values• Environmental guidelines• Economic grade

• Analyse as indicators• Binary above/below threshold

top related