spis-elena - tramways in skåne light rail day, 8 november 2011 marcus horning, project manager,...

SPIS-Elena - Tramways in Skåne

Light rail day, 8 november 2011

Marcus Horning, project manager, SPIS-Elena

Background the SPIS collaboration

• Common study (2007). Region Skåne, Malmö, Lund, Helsingborg and the National Railway Administration

• Analyzing:• Expected passengers • Economy • City development • Physical conditions in the

cities • Environmetal effects • Congestion • Regional development

Background the SPIS collaboration

• Cooperation is formalized in 2010 with political steering committee

• Partners: The Region of Skåne and the cities of Malmö, Lund and Helsingborg, in Sweden.

• The SPIS investment programme consists of the coordinated planning and implementation of a new tramway network in Lund, Malmö and Helsingborg.

Why joint venture?

•Rather small systems in each city

•One common system in the future

•Common maintenance and operation in the future

•Joint procurement – larger volume, better price

•The same technique for track and vehicles

•The same design principles

•The same design guidelines

Main projects in the SPIS- collaboration

New tramway line in LundNumber of lines: 1 lineNumber of stops: 9New trams: 8

New tramway lines in Malmö Number of lines: 2 linesNumber of stops: 35 New trams: 23

New tramway line in Helsingborg Number of lines: 1 lineNumber of stops: 13New trams: 11

Elena application fall 2010

ELENA application sent to EIB December 2010. May 2011 – application granted

•3,3 million euro til May 2014

•90 % Elena 10% divided by all parties

•25 times the leverage factor must be met before project period ends - this means an investment of 83 million euro

•Main purpose – to achieve energy efficient public transport!

Elena application fall 2010 – energy savings2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Energy saving Lund Bus -3304 -3304 -3304 -3304 -3304 -3304(MWh/yr) Tram 819 819 819 819 819 819Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips -5093 -8156 -9688 -10187 -10187 -10187Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips -3164 -5067 -6018 -6328 -6328 -6328

Total -10743 -15708 -18191 -19000 -19000 -19000Energy saving Malmö Bus -10192 -10192 -10192 -10192(MWh/yr) Tram 3526 3526 3526 3526Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips -13846 -22154 -26308 -27693Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips -8602 -13762 -16343 -17203

Total -29114 -42583 -49317 -51562Energy saving Helsingborg Bus -4760 -4760(MWh/yr) Tram 2048 2048Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips -11909 -12033Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips -7398 -7475

Total -22019 -22219-10743 -15708 -47305 -61583 -90337 -92781

Delays without ELENA regarding Energy savingsLund Total -10743 -15708 -18191 -19000 -19000 -19000

Malmö Total (opens 2018 instead) -29114 -42583

Helsingborg Total (open 2020 instead)

TOTAL Energy savings SPIS (MWh/yr) without ELENA -10743 -15708 -18191 -19000 -48114 -61583

Difference ELENA/without ELENA (percentage) 100 100 38 31 53 66

SPIS ELENASPIS Post-ELENA

TOTAL Energy saving SPIS (MWh/yr)

Aims and goals - with SPIS-Elena

•Energy efficient light rail in Skane – sustainable development

•Optimize the cooperation of the partners involved and the implementation – save time and money

•Investigate common questions – create synergy, one plattform

•Collectively communicate the project - open source

Consortium organisation Tramways in Skane

Political steering committee of SPIS

Head of chief committe of SPIS

WP 1 Project management of SPIS-Elena

WP 2 Vehicles

WP 3 Financing

WP 4 Design

WP 5 Main-

tenance

WP 6 Communication

Staff and SPIS-office

Recruting staff

•Project manager (100%)•Controller (50%)•Tendering expert (100%)•Tram expert (100%)•Project strategist (50%)•Communicator (100%)•Project coordinator 1 (100%)•Project coordinator 2 (100%)•Project coordinator 3 (100%)

WP 1 Project management of SPIS-Elena Project plan - Content

•Coordinate and lead the work•Define administative processes•Budget and timeframe•Reporting•Budget - 142 000 euro

WP 2 Vehicles

Project plan - Content

•Investigate system for – energy, technique, electricity etc•Defining maintence approach•Support for tendering preparation•Tendering•Ordering•Budget - 310 000 euro

WP 3 Financing

Project plan - Content

•Financial strategy•Different financing alternatives•Negotiation package•Successive calculation•Investigation – traffic, stages, financing sources, alternative costs etc•Budget - 180 000 euro

WP 4 Design

Project plan - Content

•Largest package•Links all WPs•Develop common standards – optimize together not seperatly•Define the most energy effective design – support model split to energy efficient public transport•Budget - 950 000 euro

WP 5 Maintenance

Project plan - Content

•Long term package•Joint maintenance system – energy and resource effective life cycle•Innovative quality system – secures a reliable and attracitve system support the modal split•60 000 euro

WP 6 Communication

Project plan - Content

•Joint communication strategy – better effect, exchange of knowledge, effective use of resources•Strategy which connects goals, challanges and opportunites•Communication plans – different target groups•(Budget – 200 000 euro not Elena funding)

Time plan

WP 1 Project managment

WP 2 Vehicles

WP 3 Finance

WP 4 Design

WP 5 Maintenance

WP 6 Communication

2011 2012 2013 2014Maj Juni

Today

EIB report

Thank you