spring 2007 internet2 member meeting 23-26 april 2007 arlington, virginia

Spring 2007Internet2 Member Meeting

23-26 April 2007Arlington, Virginia

In Memoriam: April 16, 2007

Spring 2007Internet2 Member Meeting

23-26 April 2007Arlington, Virginia

Internet2 Land Speed Record

Rich CarlsonChairI2-LSR Judging Committee

Internet2 Land Speed Record Competition Rules

• Ultimate end-to-end networking • Open to everyone at anytime• Minimum 10min. X 100 km x 2

routers (30,000 km maximum)• TCP/IP (IPv4 and IPv6)• NGI-type networks• Winner must exceed previous record

by 10%

www.internet2.edu/lsr

Internet2 Land Speed Record

IPv6 Single Stream and Multiple Stream

• 30 December 2006

• 230,100 terabit-meters/second

• 30,000 kilometers

• 7.67 gigabits per second

Internet2 Land Speed Record

IPv6 Single Stream and Multiple Stream

• 31 December 2006

• 272,400 terabit-meters/second

• 30,000 kilometers

• 9.08 gigabits per second

Greater than the IPv4 I2-LSR for the first time

Internet2 Land Speed Record

Record Setting Team

• The University of Tokyo

• WIDE Project

• NTT Communications

• et al.

TokyoIPv6 servers

Progress in Land Speed RecordProgress in Land Speed RecordIPv6IPv6

Kei Hiraki

Data Reservoir project

The University of TokyoWIDE project

JGN2NTT Communications

Amsterdam

Thanks to All

History of single-stream IPv4 Internet Land Speed Record

2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year

1

10

100

Distance bandwidth productPbit m / s

2004/11/9Data Reservoir project

WIDE project149 Pbit m / s

2002

1,000

2005/11/10240 Pbit m / s

10 Gbps * 30,000km

2006/2/20264 Pbit m / s

2004/12/24216 Pbit m / s

History of single-stream IPv6 Internet Land Speed Record

2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year

1

10

100

Distance bandwidth productPbit m / s

2006/12/30230Pbit m / s

2002

1,000

2006/12/31272Pbit m / s

10 Gbps * 30,000km

2005/10/29167 Pbit m / s

2005/11/13208 Pbit m / s

10Gbps limitation

IPv6 99% of WAN PHY bandwidth 9.06Gbps

9.6Gbps OC-192 Bandwidth 9.2Gbps WAN PHY Bandwidth 9.1Gbps TCP payload with 9KB jumbo frame

IPv4 98% of WAN PHY bandwidth 8.96Gbps

9.6Gbps OC-192 Bandwidth 9.2Gbps WAN PHY Bandwidth 9.1Gbps TCP payload with 9KB jumbo frame

What’s Next• TCP bandwidth > 10Gbps (e.g.

11Gbps)• Zero-copy software removed CPU

bottleneck• Possibly in a year (2007-2008)• Please give us two lambdas

Server NIC40Gs

SwitchSwitchRouter

10G x 2

Server NIC

PCI-ex x16

www.internet2.edu/lsr

Internet2 Driving Exemplary Applications (IDEA) Awards

David Lassner, ChairApplications Strategy Council

Internet2 IDEA Awards Concept

Internet2 IDEA Awards recognize exemplary uses of advanced networking; those with substantial impact and benefit

www.internet2.edu/lsr

Judging Panel

• David Bantz, University of Alaska• Jacqueline Brown, University of Washington• Lisa Childers, ANL/University of Chicago• Julie Little, EDUCAUSE/ELI• Jennifer Oxenford, MAGPI• Art St. George, University of New Mexico• Susan Scott, IHETS• Brian Shepard, University of Southern California• Alan Whitney, MIT• Rodger Will, Ford Motor Company

Internet2 Driving Exemplary Applications (IDEA) Awards

Ted Hanss, ChairIDEA Awards Judging Panel

Judging Criteria

• Magnitude of positive impact on current users

• Technical merit of the application

• Breadth of impact, current and expected

Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007

Globus MEDICUS

• Stephan Erberich, Director Functional Imaging and Biomedical Informatics, University of Southern California

• Carl Kesselman, Director Center for Grid Technology, Information Sciences Institute

• Ann Chervenak Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Information Sciences Institute

MEDICUS use cases: Childrens Oncology Group and

Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation Grids

Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007

UltraLight

• Harvey Newman, Caltech• Julian Bunn, Caltech• Iosif Legrand, Caltech• Dan Nae, Caltech• Yang Xia, Caltech• Frank Van Lingen, Caltech• Michael Thomas, Caltech• Conrad Steenberg, Caltech• Arshad Ali, National Institute for Information

Technologies

Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007

UltraLight

• Fiasal Khan, National University of Scienceand Technology

• Shawn McKee, University of Michigan• Paul Avery, University of Florida • Richard Cavanaugh, University of Florida• Dimitri Bourilkov, University of Florida• Paul Sheldon, Vanderbilt University• Julio Ibarra, Florida International University• Heidi Alvarez, Florida International University• Laird Kramer, Florida International University

UltraLight

• Don Petravick, Fermilab• Les Cottrell, SLAC• W. Scott Bradley, BNL• Rick Summerhill, Internet2• David Foster, CERN• Alberto Santoro, State University of Rio de

Janeiro• Sergio Novaes, State University of Sao Paulo• Dongchul Son, Kyungpook National University

Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007

Delivering the next generation of network-aware real-time GridsThe network as an integrated, managed resource;

co-scheduled with computing and stortageHybrid packet-switched + dynamic optical pathsAgent-based services spanning all the layers

Leveraging US and international network partnerships; With ESnet, USNet, KEK, Kreonet, GLORIAD, CHEPREO, WHREN/LILA, Awave, FLR, Pacific Wave, Translight,

NetherlightExtensions to Korea, Brazil, Japan and Taiwan

http://ultralight.caltech.edu Led by Caltech

U. Florida, FIU, UMich, SLAC,FNAL, MIT, CERN, Internet2, UERJ(Rio), USP, CENIC,Translight, Cisco

Four Continent Testbed

Building a global, network-aware end-to-end managed real-time Grid

FDT – Fast Data TransferAn easy-to-use application for efficient data transfers

Written in Java (with NIO libraries), it runs on all major platforms

Uses asynch., multithreaded system to: stream a dataset (list of files) continu-

ously, through an open TCP socket use multiple TCP streams, when

necessary use independent threads to read

& write on each physical device use appropriate size of buffers

for disk I/O and networking; moderate buffer sending-rate for smooth data flow

Can resume a file transfer session Can "plug-in" external security APIs and Can "plug-in" external security APIs and

use them to authenticate and authorize use them to authenticate and authorize clients: SSH, GSI-SSH, Globus-GSI, SSL clients: SSH, GSI-SSH, Globus-GSI, SSL

BWC: Stable disk-to-disk flows Tampa-Caltech: 10-to-10 and 8-to-8 1U Server-pairs for9 + 7 = 16 Gbps; then Solid overnight. Using One 10G link

17.77 Gbps BWC peak; 8.6 Gbps to and from Korea

New Capability Level: ~70 Gbps per rack of low cost 1U servers

I. Legrand

CERNGeneva

CALTECHPasadena

Starlight

Manlan

USLHCnet

Internet2

FDT Automatic Path Recovery: Fiber Cut Simulations

“Fiber cut” simulationsThe traffic moves from one transatlantic link to the other oneFDT transfer (CERN – CALTECH) continues uninterruptedTCP fully recovers in ~ 20s

1

23

4

FDT Transfer

www.internet2.edu/idea

Governance and Nominations Committee Update

Steve Hall, ChairDavid Lassner, Vice-chair

Governance and Nominations CommitteeSteve Hall, Governance and Nominations Committee chair,

Industry Strategy Council chairDavid Lassner, University of Hawaii, Applications Strategy

Council chair, Governance and Nominations Committee vice-chair

Mary Sue Coleman, University of MichiganKristine Hafner, University of California Office of the

PresidentGwen Jacobs, Montana State UniversityLen Kleinrock, University of California Los AngelesMichael Krugman, Boston University and Northern

Crossroads GigaPoP

Governance and Nominations CommitteeLarry Landweber, University of Wisconsin Madison,

and Network Research Liaison Council chair David Lassner, University of Hawaii,

and Applications Strategy Council chairJack McCredie, University of California Berkeley,

and Network Planning and Policy Advisory Council chairMarilyn McMillan, New York UniversityHarvey Newman, California Institute of TechnologyMike Roberts, The Darwin GroupPankaj Shah, OARnetDoug Van Houweling, Internet2, ex officio

Timeline Recap

Summer 2006• GNC Convened by Internet2 BoardDecember 2006 – January 2007• Draft report presented and finalized• Board endorses GNC recommendationsApril 2007• Council nominations openMay 2007• Nominations closeJune 2007• Member electionsJuly 2007• New Councils take effect

GNC Recommended Changes1. New Advisory Council Structure

Function rather than constituency

Heterogeneous membership, stratified elections

2. New Board Structure 15 members More voice from CIO’s, networks, researchers, industry

3. New Communications Structure

Formalized, predictable, consistent

2-way links across the organization

Advisory Councils

Implemented: Revised Advisory Councils

Architecture & Operations

Advisory Council

Services Advisory

Council

Research Advisory Council

Industry Relations Advisory Council

Elected members:•3 CIO background•3 Research background•3 R&E Net background•3 Industry background

Heterogeneous composition of each Council (15 per Council):•12 elected by membership at large •3 appointed by Board

•Open nominations•GNC oversees election•Membership election•Council members elect chair

New Advisory Council Structure

• Heterogeneous Membership for Each Council• 12 elected members:

• 3 researchers• 3 from industry• 3 from state or regional networks• 3 member CIOs

• 3 members appointed by Internet2 (Internet2-NLR) Board

• *3 additional members appointed by NLR Board to represent NLR investors

New Advisory Council Structure

Links to Management• Senior Management Liaison for Each Council• New “Chief Scientist” to be Liaison to

Research Advisory Council

Links to Board• Council Chairs Serve as Voting Trustees• Councils as Key Source of Policy Advice

Current GNC issues

• NLR participation on the GNC• Transition of current to new Councils• Constituency consultation and preparation of

ballot • Trusted election process• Identification of chairs• Criteria for and timing of appointed seats• Network Researcher Task Force• GNC composition and terms• Getting a great set of nominees!

GNC Communications with Membership

• Biweekly GNC meetings held in March and April, focused on nominations and elections process; two summaries and Call for Nominations sent to community to date

• Weekly GNC meetings starting 5/1 will be focused on preparing for the election; chairs will continue to update community on progress and plans

• Information on GNC, Call for Nominations, and evolving FAQ:

http://www.internet2.edu/about/governance/nominations.html

Election Process

• Modeled after EDUCAUSE process

• Voters are Executive Liaisons from member organizations in good standing

• Ballot form and process designed to ensure representation and participation

• External auditors assuring entire process is secure, private, and valid

Elections Schedule

• Nominations through 7 May• Ballots distributed in late May• Election 1-15 June • GNC recommends individuals for

Board-appointed seats on Councils• NLR Board appoints additional investor

seats• New Councils take effect in July

Please Help!

• Nominate respected colleagues!

• Nominate yourself!

Community Update

Tracy Futhey, Chair, National LambdaRail

Jeffrey Lehman, Chair, Internet2

Spring 2007Internet2 Member Meeting

23-26 April 2007Arlington, Virginia