sqn ldr parul goelasmameeting.org › asma2013_mp › pdfs › asma2013_present_084.pdftwo...

Post on 29-Jan-2021

4 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

  • Sqn Ldr Parul Goel

  • I have no financial relationships to disclose

    I will not discuss off-label use and/or investigational use in my presentation

  • Conventional aircraft +Gz acceleration

    Gy accelerations rare

    Studies 1960’s*

    *Hershgold E. Roentgenographic study of humans during transverse acceleration. Aerospace Med. 1960;31:213-9

    4

  • Gy frequent

    During “point”, “shoot” and “scoot” maneuvers (Super-agile aircraft)

    Physiological response altered with Gy

    5

  • Effect of concurrent +Gy acceleration on +Gz tolerance

    6

  • Albery studied ±1/2Gy concurrent with +Gz *

    ↑in +Gz tolerance with concurrent Gy

    *Albery WB. Acceleration in other axes affects +Gz tolerance: Dynamic centrifuge simulation of agile flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.

    2004 Jan; 75(1): 1-6

    7

  • Popplow et al*

    ↓in arterial oxygen saturation ±1.5/2/2.5Gy & ±1/2Gz for 30s

    Decreased arterial oxygen saturations

    *Popplow JR, Veghte JH, Hudson KE. Cardiopulmonary responses to combined lateral and vertical acceleration. Aviat. Space

    Environ. Med. 1983 Jul; 54(7): 632-6

    8

  • Scant literature

    Contradictory findings

    Necessity for further study

    9

  • High Performance Human Centrifuge (HPHC)

    30 male

    18-37 y

    Institute Ethics Committee

    10

  • High Performance Human Centrifuge

  • High Performance Human Centrifuge

  • Control and Monitoring Station

  • Ejection Seat Mock Up with Five Point Harness System

  • Based on subjects’ experience:

    Experienced [“E”]

    Inexperienced [“IE”]

    15

  • Two centrifuge runs Run 1: pure +Gz run (0.1Gz/s) Run 2: combined acceleration run (+Gz/+2Gy)

    +Gy *Baseline +1.4GzEnd point - +9Gz/Peripheral Light Loss

    *Gell CF. Table of equivalents for acceleration terminology. Aerospace Medicine. 1961 Dec: 1109-11

    16

  • 17

    Baseline +1.4Gz

    Profile 1 starts

    +0.1Gz/sec

    PLL/+9Gz

    +Gz

    Time

    PURE +Gz Run

  • 18

    Baseline +1.4Gz

    0 Gy

    Profile 2 begins

    1Gy/sec

    2 Gy

    2Gy

    + 0.15Gz +0.1Gz/sec

    PLL/+9Gz

    +Gz/+2Gy Run

  • 19

    LIGHT BAR

  • Dead Man Switch (DMS)

    Head back

    Heart Rate (HR)

    20

  • 21

    Dead Man Switch

  • Ejection seat mock up

    Harness

    Additional restraints

    22

  • Paired-t test

    ANOVA with a post hoc tukey

    23

  • 30 subjects 25 (83%) completed the protocol23 readings for +Gz tolerances 22 readings HR data

    24

  • No correlation

    25

    ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA AGE 25.83±5.46 y

    HEIGHT 171.7±5.89 cm WEIGHT 70.98±9.67 kg

  • The relaxed +Gz tolerance

    “Pure +Gz” 4.46±0.51 Gz (3.21-5.28 Gz)

    “Combined 5.07±0.62 Gz (3.31-5.95Gz) acceleration”

    Mean ↑ in tolerance 0.61 Gz

    26

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 230.00.51.01.5

    2.02.53.0

    3.54.04.5

    5.05.56.0

    Comparison of +Gz Tolerance among both profiles

    Subjects

    +G

    z To

    lera

    nce

    +Gz RUN

    +Gz/+2Gy RUN

  • No significant difference“E” & “IE” group

    28

  • ↑ in HR with ↑ in level of acceleration

    Combined acceleration > pure +Gz

    HR at PLL

    29

  • Comparison of the HR during Run 1 and 2

    +1Gz

    +1.4G

    z

    +1.4G

    z

    +2Gz

    +3Gz PL

    L

    +1Gz

    (Bac

    k)

    3 sec

    (pos

    t sto

    p)

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180+Gz+Gz/+2Gy

    +Gz ACCELERATION

    HEA

    RT R

    ATE

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    HR AT PLL

    SUBJECTS

    HE

    AR

    T R

    ATE

    HR at PLL (+Gz Run)HR at PLL(+Gz/+2Gy Run)

  • ↑ In relaxed +Gz tolerance

    Albery (↑ of 0.4Gz - +2Gy)

    32

  • 21/23 subjects - ↑ tolerance

    Straining

    ↑ Venous return & peripheral vasoconstriction - ↑ in head level BP – ↑ +Gz tolerance

    Straining tolerance likely to be similar

    33

  • Two mutually perpendicular accelerations

    Increased magnitude and different direction

    The visceral organs & vessels

    ↓ in hydrostatic effects

    34

  • Sensation of tumbling & being thrown out of seat

    Fear & apprehension during the run - sympathetic system stimulation -↑ tolerance

    35

  • Nausea

    Motion sick - ↑secretion of stress hormones

    Albery - vestibular system

    36

  • Concurrent +2Gy contributed to a higher rise in HR

    Better cardiovascular response

    37

  • A significant increase in +Gz tolerance (0.61Gz)

    Better HR response

    Straining by subjects & vestibular overstimulation

    Contribute positively to the benefits of supermaneuverability

    38

  • 39

  • Pure +Gz run

    Combined acceleration run ‘Baseline’ of +1.4 Gz to +2Gy (+1Gy/s)Gz component steadily decreased to ~0Gz (+0.15 Gz)‘Pure Gy’ maintained for 1 sGz was gradually added at the

    rate of 0.1 G/s

    40

  • Transient relative negative G

    There was no significant difference in the HR at +1Gz and at +1Gz/+2Gy

    41

    Effect of Concurrent +Gy Acceleration on +Gz ToleranceDisclosure Information 84th Annual AsMA Scientific Meeting Sqn Ldr Parul GoelSlide 3INTRODUCTIONSlide 5AIMPAST STUDIESSlide 8NEED FOR STUDYMATERIAL & METHODSSlide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15PROTOCOLSlide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21SEAT & HARNESSSTATISTICAL ANALYSISRESULTSRESULTS (CONTD.)Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Slide 31DISCUSSIONDISCUSSIONSlide 34Slide 35Slide 36Slide 37CONCLUSIONSlide 39Slide 40Slide 41

top related