ssrs work (purity) ref & asymmetry entangle trade off etcetera rq i w nov 07 1 fabio anselmi...

Post on 15-Dec-2015

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

11

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

Fabio AnselmiVenetian Inst. Mol. Med. Padova

Kurt JacobsU. Mass, Boston

Graham White Howard WisemanJoan VGriffith Uni.

arXive:quant-ph/0501121v2

Quantum Reference FramesQuantum Reference Framessuperselection rules, reference ancilla & superselection rules, reference ancilla &

entanglemententanglement

22

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

W

GGA

)(loGGW

GGE

• Superselection Rules (SSRs)– restricted operations– general symmetry groups

• Reference & Asymmetry– asymmetry: ability to act as a reference

• Work - a measure of purity

• Entanglement - limited by SSR

• Trade off between resources• Etcetera…

S

g

h

OverviewOverview

33RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

Wick, Wightman & Wigner, Phys. Rev. 80, 101 (1952).

“We shall say that a superselection rule operates between subspaces …

• if a selection rule operates between them… and if, …

• there are no measurable quantities with finite matrix elements between their state vectors.”

n

1n

2n

1n

1n

ie

Superselection Rules (SSRs)Superselection Rules (SSRs)Selection rules forbid transitions of a given kind – m = 2 not allowed for optical dipole transitions etc but not transitions of any kind – e.g. electron collisions etc.

44RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

n

1n

2n

1n

1n

ie

10 ie

impose the rule: physical operations conserve local particle number

then coherence between subspaces of different particle number are nondetectable

an imposed superselection rule.

E.g. optics: the phase in

is unobservable ….

Example: local conservation of particle number

Y.Aharonov and L.Susskind, Phys. Rev. 155, 1428 (1967).A. Kitaev, D. Mayers, and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052326 (2004).S.D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, R.W. Spekkens, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007)

55RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

impose the rule: physical operations conserve local particle number

then coherence between subspaces of different particle number are nondetectable

an imposed superselection rule.

E.g. optics: the phase in

is unobservable …. except relativeto a local oscillator (a reference phase)

n

1n

2n

1n

1n

ie

Y.Aharonov and L.Susskind, Phys. Rev. 155, 1428 (1967).A. Kitaev, D. Mayers, and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052326 (2004).S.D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, R.W. Spekkens, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007)

10 ie

Example: local conservation of particle number

reference

Pegg… PRL 81 1604 (1998)quantum scissors, phase shift

66RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

Consider set of unitary operators whose effect is not physically detectable: G = {T1, T2, T3, …}

Non-detectable operations form a group

GTGT ii 1 then , if• the effect of a product of two such

operators is also non-detectable, thus

GTTGTGT jiji then , and if• clearly the identity operator is in G

Thus G = {T1, T2, T3, … }

is a group which expresses the symmetry of the system

• if effect of Ti is not detectable then

effect of time-reversed operator Ti1

is also not detectable, i.e. ie

n 1n2n

3n

ie

NieTˆˆ

77RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

GT

ggGg

TTG

1ˆ][

1ˆ G

10

1100

222

ˆˆ

21

dee NiNiUG

20 : )()1( NieTU

Accessible state• the effective state given the undetectable coherences

S

no referenceG=SO(2)

S

“crisp“

Bartlett and Wiseman, PRL 91, 097903 (2003).

Ex 2: optical phase shifts are non-detectable (without a reference)

reduced purity

“The Twirl”

Ex 1: rotations are nondetectable without a spatial reference

88RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

S

“crisp“

Accessible state• the effective state given the undetectable coherences

GT

ggGg

TTG

1ˆ][

1ˆ G

reduced purity

“The Twirl”

Ex 1: rotations are nondetectable without a spatial reference

10

20 : )()1( NieTU

Ex 2: optical phase shifts are non-detectable (without a reference)

Bartlett and Wiseman, PRL 91, 097903 (2003).

noreference

equally likely to be any value of

UG

effective state has random phase

1100

222

ˆˆ

21

dee NiNiUG

99RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

T

Z

eP

kTE

E

/

0 1

Extracting work (purity measure)Extracting work (purity measure)

1010RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

2log

0

1

Tk

dEPW

B

kTE

kTE

e

eP

/

/

1 1

dEPdW 1dE

)]ˆ([log)ˆ( SDTkW B

subtract initial entropy

T

Z

eP

kTE

E

/

0 1

1

Extracting work (purity measure)Extracting work (purity measure)

von Neumannentropy

dim.

1111RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

T

Z

eP

kTE

E

/

)ˆ(log)ˆ( SDW

1

under G-SSR the extractable work is

])ˆ[(log)ˆ( GSDWG

0 1

Extracting work (purity measure)Extracting work (purity measure)

2log

0

1

Tk

dEPW

B

kTE

kTE

e

eP

/

/

1 1

dEPdW 1dE

)]ˆ([log)ˆ( SDTkW B

subtract initial entropy

von Neumannentropy

dim.

1212RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Ref & Asymmetry Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

Reference ancilla (frame)Reference ancilla (frame)• the SSR imposes a symmetry which

reduces the purity• we need to break the symmetry

& preserve the coherence• this requires an asymmetric ancilla

• define symmetric state as one for which

ˆˆ G• define asymmetric state as one for which

ˆˆ G

GT

ggGg

TTG

1ˆ][

1ˆ G

The Twirl

• use loss of purity to measure asymmetry

ˆˆ)ˆ( SSAG G

von Neumann entropyAsymmetry

1313RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Ref & Asymmetry Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

iff is symmetric:

0)ˆ( GA

Asymmetry (reference ability)Asymmetry (reference ability)

0)ˆ( GA ˆˆ G)ˆ(GA does not increase for G-SSR operations Q

GggTgTgTgT )(]ˆ[)()](ˆ)([ 11 QQSynergy of is given by)ˆ(GW

)]ˆ()ˆ([)ˆˆ()ˆ,ˆ,( 212121 GGGG WWWW

ˆˆ)ˆ( SSAG G

i)

ii)

iii)

iv)

• any ancilla with asymmetry can act as a reference to (partially) break the SSR

Properties of Asymmetry:

R

reference ancillasystem

S

1414RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Ref & Asymmetry Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

SR

gGfG

acting separately

acting as single system

Upper bound

asymmetry is a resource

advantage of acting as a composite system

Synergy Synergy

)]ˆ()ˆ([)ˆˆ()ˆ,ˆ,( SGRGSRGSRG WWWW

)ˆ(

)}ˆ(),ˆ(min{)ˆ,ˆ,(

RG

SGRGSRG

A

AAW

S

gG

R

1515RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Ref & Asymmetry Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

Example: local conservation of particles [U(1)]

N

n

neR inN

01

1)(

10

)(110)(1

11

1

1

NNOneneR

N

n

iin

• decoherent free subspaces (superselection sectors)• coherence is preserved

}{ 20,ˆ:ˆ)1(ˆ

NieTTU

)ˆˆ( 21 NNie

system:

ref. ancilla:

R S

combined (ref. ancilla + system):

Pegg & Barnett (1989).

110022 UG

n

U nnR N 11)(G

invariant to

group:

1616RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Ref & Asymmetry Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

combined: )(....conj herm....110)( 1

11

1

1

NN OnenR

N

n

iU G

state AG

2

2

22

2

2loglog

)1(log2 N

10

N

n

neR inN

01

1)(

)(R

2

2

22

2

2loglog1)(,; 1

NRAG

2

2

22

2

2

2 loglog1)1(log N

N)( R

Synergy of AG: the reduction in entropy due to combined action

R S

S

R

1717RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Ref & Asymmetry Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

)ˆ(log)ˆ( GG SDW G

)ˆ(log)ˆ( SDW

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ( SSA GG G )ˆ()ˆ()ˆ( GG AWW

GA

)ˆ(W

GW

asymmetricsymmetric

1818RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

)ˆ()ˆ( GGGG WW G

Gg Gh

hghg TTTTGGG

11ˆ][

2G

GGG

Bipartite systems & EnganglementBipartite systems & Enganglement

Local action of the group: local G-SSR

g

h

1919RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

iff is locally symmetric:

0)ˆ( GGA

Local asymmetryLocal asymmetry

0)ˆ( GGA ˆˆˆ 11 GG GG

)ˆ(GGA does not increase for locally G-SSR operations Q

Synergy of is given by)ˆ(GGW

)]ˆ()ˆ([)ˆˆ()ˆ,ˆ,( 212121 GGGGGGGG WWWW })ˆ(),ˆ(min{ 21 GGGG AA

ˆˆ)ˆ( SSA GGGG G

i)

ii)

iii)

iv)

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ( GGGG AWW

GGA

)ˆ(W

can act as local & sharedreference

GGW

g

hg

h

2020RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

GGGGGG EEE

Super-additivity:

01001 GGE

Accessible entanglementAccessible entanglement

N

nnnEpE GG

0

n

nnnn

pp

ˆ ;ˆ

projection onto n particles at A

Examples:

A B

A B

1,1

2,0

0,2

+

N particles shared between A and BWiseman and Vaccaro, PRL 91, 097902 (2003).

2121RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

Extracting local workExtracting local work Oppenheim et al PRL 89, 180402 (2002))ˆ(L W

)ˆ(L W

2222RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

jijic ˆˆˆ , Q

classically-correlated state with min entropy

Q

LOC

C

local extraction of work

)ˆ()ˆ(L QWW

equivalent method

transfer using a classical channel

2323RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

transfer using a classical channel

Q

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ(L EWW

pure state

dephase in Schmidt basis

equivalent method for pure states

jijic ˆˆˆ , Q

LOC

C

classically-correlated state with min entropy

local extraction of work

2424RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

transfer using a classical channel

Q

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ(L EWW

pure state

equivalent method for pure states

jijic ˆˆˆ , Q

LOC

C

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ( L EWW

classically-correlated state with min entropy

local extraction of work

dephase in Schmidt basis

2525RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

transfer using a classical channel

ˆˆ GG

Pure, globally symmetric states

Q

LOC

C

local extraction of work

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ()ˆ(L GGGGGG AEWW -

classically-correlated state with min entropy

dephase in Schmidt basis for each charge

g

h

Extracting local work under local SSRExtracting local work under local SSR

jijic ˆˆˆ , Q

GGG

2626RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry EntangleEntangle Trade off Etcetera

transfer using a classical channel

ˆˆ GG

Pure, globally symmetric states

Q

LOC

C

local extraction of work

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ()ˆ(L GGGGGG AEWW -

classically-correlated state with min entropy

dephase in Schmidt basis for each charge

g

h

Extracting local work under local SSRExtracting local work under local SSR

jijic ˆˆˆ , Q

GGG

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ()ˆ( L GGGGGG AEWW

2727RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Trade off Etcetera

mechanical worklogical work

)ˆ()ˆ()ˆ()ˆ( L GGGGGG AEWW

W

)(loGGW

GGE

symmetry

GGA

asymmetry

reference

TradeoffTradeoff

2828RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Trade off Etcetera

0110

01100110

1 0 1 2 L

GGGGGG AEWW

23 2

1 2 4 L

GGGGGG AEWW

Recall examples for U(1)

A B

A B

S R

R

ability to act as shared reference

super-additivity of accessible entanglement=GGA

2929RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Trade off Etcetera

0110

01100110

1 0 1 2 L

GGGGGG AEWW

23 2

1 2 4 L

GGGGGG AEWW

Recall examples for U(1)

A B

A B

S R

R

ability to act as shared reference

super-additivity of accessible entanglement=GGA

3030RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Trade off Etcetera

GGGGGG AEWW L

Optimum shared reference states?

make zero make maximum

NR

0110

RANRE GGGG

047.1)(log~ 221 NRA GG

N

N

nnnR

4

1 BA4

0 RE GG

NRA GG 2

NRW 2)(

N4Dim

NRW 2)( NRW GG L 0L RW GG

3131RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Trade off Etcetera

Hierarchy of restrictions-resourcesHierarchy of restrictions-resources

GG AWW

GGGGG AWW

GGGGGG EWW L

EWW L

LOCC

G

GG

LOCC, GG

WW -

for globally-symmetric states

g

h

g

h

3232RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off EtceteraEtcetera

Etcetera…Etcetera…

)(A

),;(AQ

G

G R

Complete reference frame when

then system is completely “shielded” from G

Normalised synergy of asymmetry:

• Figure of merit - Quality

M

m

mM 01

1system state

N

n

in neN

R01

1

reference:

1Qquality

(M=30)

N

3333RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off EtceteraEtcetera

repeated use of a reference ancilla with independent systems reduces its reference ability…

• Consumption of reference ability

• Complementarity – generalisation

S1

RS2

R’

The symmetry-asymmetry dichotomy is fundamental to a system. Arises from its “geometry”.

It may help understanding of the fundamental particle-wave duality in terms of a symmetry-asymmetry dichotomy.

3434

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

• reference ancilla

• accessible entanglement and work

• tradeoff of resources: reference ability

versus mechanical work

versus logical work

R

reference f rame

asymmetric system

S

1,1

2,0

0,2

+

W

GGA

)(loGGW

GGE

triality

SummarySummary

3535

SSRs Work (purity) Ref & Asymmetry Entangle Trade off Etcetera

RQRQ II WW Nov 07 Nov 07

top related