stream fusion for haskell arrays

Post on 12-Nov-2014

1.761 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Arrays have traditionally been an awkward data structure for Haskell programmers. Despite the large number of array libraries available, they have remained relatively awkward to use in comparison to the rich suite of purely functional data structures, such as fingertrees or finite maps. Arrays have simply not been first class citizens in the language. In this talk we’ll begin with a survey of the more than a dozen array types available, including some new matrix libraries developed in the past year. I’ll then describe a new efficient, pure, and flexible array library for Haskell with a list like interface, based on work in the Data Parallel Haskell project, that employs stream fusion to dramatically reduce the cost of pure arrays. The implementation will be presented from the ground up, along with a discussion of the entire compilation process of the library, from source to assembly. Source: http://www.galois.com/blog/2008/08/28/galois-tech-talks/

TRANSCRIPT

Stream Fusion for Haskell Arrays

Don StewartGalois Inc

Haskell's Data Types● Beautiful algebraic data types:

data Set a

= Tip

| Bin !Int a !(Set a) !(Set a)

● Concise notation, inductive reasoning, type math!

● Polymorphic, strongly typed, side effect free

● Efficient. GCd. Strict, or lazy, or roll your own

● Pointers, pointers...

But for real speed...

Sometimes we need unboxed, flat structures:

Arrays in Haskellbiodiversity!

Data.Array

Data.Array.Diff

Data.Array.IO

Data.Array.Storable

Data.Array.ST

Data.Array.Unboxed

Data.Array.CArray

Data.ArrayBZ

Foreign.Array

Foreign.Ptr

Foreign.ForeignPtr

Data.ByteString

Data.ByteString.Lazy

Data.PackedString

Data.StorableVector

Data.Vec

BLAS.Matrix

Data.Packed

Data.Packed.Vector

Data.Packed.Matrix

The Perfect Array Type

1.Very, very efficient. Ruthlessly fast.

2.Polymorphic

3.Pure

4.Rich list-like API

5.Compatible with C arrays, other arrays

Data Parallel Haskell

● Project to target large multicore systems:Chakravarty, Leshchinksiy, Peyton-Jones, Keller, Marlow

● Parallel, distributed arrays, with good interface● Built from flat, unlifted arrays● The core of a better array type for mortals

● Built around array fusion “Stream Fusion: From Lists to Streams to Nothing at All”

Coutts, Leshchinskiy, Stewar.t 2007.

● Key technique for making arrays flexible and fast

uvector: fast, flat, fused arrays

data BUArr e = BUArr !Int !Int ByteArray#

data MBUArr s e = MBUArr !Int (MutableByteArray# s)

Two data types: mutable arrays and pure arrays

● Fill the mutable array, freeze it, and get free substrings, and persistance.● Low level Haskell

Primitive operationslength :: BUArr e -> Intlength (BUArr _ n _) = n

newMBU :: UAE e => Int -> ST s (MBUArr s e)

class UAE e where sizeBU :: Int -> e -> Int indexBU :: BUArr e -> Int -> e

readMBU :: MBUArr s e -> Int -> ST s e writeMBU :: MBUArr s e -> Int -> e -> ST s ()

Conversions

unsafeFreezeMBU :: MBUArr s e -> Int -> ST s (BUArr e)

unsafeFreezeMBU (MBUArr m mba) n = checkLen "unsafeFreezeMBU" m n $ ST $ \s -> (# s, BUArr 0 n (unsafeCoerce# mba) #)

Zero-copying conversion from mutable to pure

Bounds checking compiled out if -funsafe

Array element instances

Simple per-type representation choices

instance UAE () where sizeBU _ _ = 0 indexBU (BUArr _ _ _) (I# _) = ()

readMBU (MBUArr _ _) (I# _) = ST $ \s -> (# s, () #) writeMBU (MBUArr _ _) (I# _) () = ST $ \s -> (# s, () #)

Goal 1: Efficiency

Can be a bit fancier...

instance UAE Bool where

readMBU (MBUArr n mba) i@(I# i#) = ST $ \s -> case readWordArray# mba (bOOL_INDEX i#) s of (# s2, r# #) -> (# s2, (r# `and#` bOOL_BIT i#) `neWord#` int2Word# 0# #

bOOL_INDEX :: Int# -> Int##if SIZEOF_HSWORD == 4bOOL_INDEX i# = i# `uncheckedIShiftRA#` 5##elif SIZEOF_HSWORD == 8bOOL_INDEX i# = i# `uncheckedIShiftRA#` 6##endif

Relax. Low level stuff done.

Goal 2: polymorphicAbstract over the primitive arrays

class UA e where

data UArr e data MUArr e :: * -> *

lengthU :: UArr e -> Int indexU :: UArr e -> Int -> e lengthMU :: MUArr e s -> Int newMU :: Int -> ST s (MUArr e s) freezeMU :: MUArr e s -> Int -> ST s (UArr e) readMU :: MUArr e s -> Int -> ST s e writeMU :: MUArr e s -> Int -> e -> ST s ()

Goal 3a: PureIntroducing UArr .. purely!

newU :: UA e => Int -> (forall s. MUArr e s -> ST s Int) -> UArr e

newU n init = runST (do ma <- newMU n n' <- init ma freezeMU ma n' )

Mutation encapsulate in ST monad.

Flexible array representationsinstance UA () where newtype UArr () = UAUnit Int newtype MUArr () s = MUAUnit Int

lengthU (UAUnit n) = n indexU (UAUnit _) _ = () sliceU (UAUnit _) _ n = UAUnit n

lengthMU (MUAUnit n) = n newMU n = return $ MUAUnit n readMU (MUAUnit _) _ = return () writeMU (MUAUnit _) _ _= return ()

freezeMU (MUAUnit _) n = return $ UAUnit n

Goal 4: list-like operations

data (:*:) a b = !a :*: !b

instance (UA a, UA b) => UA (a :*: b) where

data UArr (a :*: b) = UAProd !(UArr a) !(UArr b)

data MUArr (a :*: b) s = MUAProd !(MUArr a s) !(MUArr b s)

indexU (UAProd l r) i = indexU l i :*: indexU r i

Support for numeric stuff

instance (RealFloat a, UA a) => UA (Complex a) where

newtype UArr (Complex a) = UAComplex (UArr (a :*: a)) newtype MUArr (Complex a) s = MUAComplex (MUArr (a :*: a) s)

indexU (UAComplex arr) i = case indexU arr i of (a :*: b) -> a :+ b

But that's not the end

• Strict, pure arrays are a bit too inefficient

• Too much copying, not enough sharing

• Impure languages would just mutate inplace

• But we need to find some other way to deforest.

Goal 1&2: EfficiencyStream Fusion

data Step s a = Done | Skip !s | Yield !a !s

data Stream a = exists s. Stream (s -> Step s a) !s Int

● Abstract sequence transformers● Non-recursive● General fusion rule for removing intermediates● We'll convert arrays into abstract sequences● Non-recursive things we can optimise ruthlessly

Conversion to and from arraysstreamU :: UA a => UArr a -> Stream a

streamU arr = Stream next 0 n where n = lengthU arr

next i | i == n = Done | otherwise = Yield (arr `indexU` i) (i+1)

unstreamU :: UA a => Stream a -> UArr a

unstreamU st@(Stream next s n) = newDynU n (\marr -> unstreamMU marr st)

Convert recursive array loops to non-recursive streams

mapU :: (UA e, UA e') => (e -> e') -> UArr e -> UArr e'mapU f = unstreamU . mapS f . streamU

headU :: UA e => UArr e -> eheadU = headS . StreamU

lastU :: UA e => UArr e -> elastU = foldlU (flip const)

The fusion rule

"streamU/unstreamU" forall s. streamU (unstreamU s) = s

● Compositions of non-recursive functions left over● Then combine streams using general optimisations● Arrays at the end will be fused from the combined stream pipeline

● Use rules to remove redundant conversions

Filling a mutable array

unstreamMU :: UA a => MUArr a s -> Stream a -> ST s Int

unstreamMU marr (Stream next s n) = fill s 0 where fill s !i = case next s of Done -> return i Skip s' -> s' `seq` fill s' i Yield x s' -> s' `seq` do writeMU marr i x fill s' (i+1)

New streams

emptyS :: Stream aemptyS = Stream (const Done) () 0

replicateS :: Int -> a -> Stream areplicateS n x = Stream next 0 n where next i | i == n = Done | otherwise = Yield x (i+1)

enumFromToS :: (Ord a, RealFrac a) => a -> a -> Stream a

enumFromToS n m = Stream next n (truncate (m - n)) where lim = m + 1/2 next s | s > lim = Done | otherwise = Yield s (s+1)

Transforming streamsmapS :: (a -> b) -> Stream a -> Stream bmapS f (Stream next s n) = Stream next' s n where next' s = case next s of Done -> Done Skip s' -> Skip s' Yield x s' -> Yield (f x) s'

foldS :: (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Stream a -> bfoldS f z (Stream next s _) = fold z s where fold !z s = case next s of Yield x !s' -> fold (f z x) s' Skip !s' -> fold z s' Done -> z

Zipping streams

zipWithS :: (a -> b -> c) -> Stream a -> Stream b -> Stream c

zipWithS f (Stream next1 s m) (Stream next2 t n) = Stream next (s :*: t) m where next (s :*: t) = case next1 s of Done -> Done Skip s' -> Skip (s' :*: t) Yield x s' -> case next2 t of Done -> Done Skip t' -> Skip (s :*: t') Yield y t' -> Yield (f x y) (s' :*: t')

Arrays to streams to nothing at all ...

Future

● Allow users to pick and choose between fused or direct implementations

● Write some big programs in this style● Goal 4: more conversions from other array

types (e.g. ByteStrings, Ptr a)● Conversions to and from other sequence types

via streams – no overhead for the conversion● DPH's goals: parallel nested arrays, fusible

mutable arrays.

OM NOM NOM NOM

It's on hackage.haskell.org

top related