summary, findings and recommendationsshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11560/15/15_chapter...
Post on 07-Mar-2018
227 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER - VII
SUMMARY, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents summary, findings and recommendations of the
study. It was a case study of Malabar Milk Cooperative Producers Union to
evaluate its operations, management and marketing activities with a view to
identifying major strengths, weaknesses etc. This study had as major objective
identification and analysis of the real problems that MRCMPU faced with a
view to generate useful information for it to formulate an effective strategy
that can make it vibrant and more competitive.
The following part of this chapter shows summary of the study,
findings divided into major findings and other findings, results of hypothesis
testing and also the recommendations of the study.
SUMMARY
The introduction chapter dealt with a brief report of dairying in India
and Kerala, Operation Flood and its phases, and the formation of KCMMF
(Milma). The problem, scope, and objectives of the study, hypotheses, and
methodology were elaborated. Besides sample design, research design, the
tools of analysis, data collection tools, limitations and chapter scheme of the
107
study were also explicated. A brief explanation about KCMMF Ltd,
MRCMPU Ltd, and MCDMU Ltd were also included. Definitions of various
terms such as competitive advantage, competitive strategy, core competence
and competitive analysis were also presented. In the last part of the
introduction chapter, various studies conducted within the country and outside
the country on competitiveness of dairy sector were reviewed.
In the second chapter, the mission of Milma, its area of operation,
activities and other programmes were mentioned first. As the first part of the
first secondary objective was to evaluate the performance of KCMMF Ltd in
general, seven variables such as growth of APCOS, growth in farmer members
and suppliers, growth in procurement of milk, growth in milk sales, growth in
milk products sales, growth in turnover and profitability of KCMMF were
analysed and interpreted. For this, secondary data from the annual reports of
KCMMF Ltd for the period 1990 to 2003 were used.
As part of the first secondary objective, to evaluate the performance of
MRCMPU Ltd, operational performance, financial performance and value
addition were analysed. Operational variables such growth rate of APCOS,
growth rate of farmer members, milk procurement, sales of milk, sales of milk
products were considered first. Next, financial variables such as profitability
ratios such as gross profit margin, net profit margin, operating profit margin,
operating ratio, turnover ratios such as total assets turnover, fixed assets
turnover, working capital turnover, inventory turnover, profitability ratios in
108
relation to investment such as return on total assets, return on capital
employed, return on equity, and solvency ratio like debt equity ratio of dairies
and MRCMPU were ascertained. Under value addition variables , gross value
addition, net value addition, total value addition, value of production,
incremental gross value addition, incremental net value addition, incremental
total value addition were analysed.
The fourth chapter dealt with the analysis for the second secondary
objective of the study. Data from the survey of retailers of Milma milk and
milk products were analysed. Distribution of Milma milk and milk products
from the dairies, selling of Milma milk and milk products through the outlets,
and competition from other firms in the milk and milk products market were
part of the analysis. Analysis of distribution covered the delivery of milk and
milk products, convenience in delivery time of Milma milk and milk products,
availability of Milma milk and milk products were studied. Under selling of
milk and milk products, movement of milk, seasonal variation of Milma milk,
seasonal variation of Milma milk products were evaluated. Since Milma
claimed that competition was one of the major problems, competition from the
other private firms in Kannur, Kozhikode and Malapuram districts was
examined in detail. Under competition, intensity of competition, ultimate
effect of competition, decline in counter sales were taken into account. Cornell
technique was used in order to measure the overall retailer satisfaction score.
109
The fifth chapter mainly focused on customer service level of
MRCMPU and consumer satisfaction. In order to cover the first part of the
third secondary objective, the customer service level of MRCMPU to
maximise the customer’s perceived value of the brand was evaluated. For this,
awareness, availability, purchase of Milma milk and milk products, and
loyalty of consumers of Milma milk and milk products were considered. To
evaluate consumer satisfaction, cornel technique was used to ascertain
consumer satisfaction score. For this, availability, price, quality, packing of
Milma milk and milk products and response of Milma to changing needs were
taken into account. Finally, purchase of milk and milk products by the
nonusers of Milma milk, their opinion about price and quality of Milma milk
and milk products and the general matters affecting the quality of milk and
milk products were taken into account.
As the fourth secondary objective of this study was to assess
operational efficiency of MRCMPU and recommend measures to enhance
efficiency of operations, the study focused on developing various models such
as forecasting model, processing model, inventory model, location planning
and SWOT Analysis of MRCMPU. Forecasting model was developed to
forecast the demand of milk and milk products. The processing model
suggested ways and means to enhance the volume of production of milk and
milk products in the fragmented supply chain. A model for capacity utilisation
of milk and milk products equipment was developed to identify idle time and
110
bottlenecks. Inventory model aimed to ascertain the amount of safety stock
necessary to satisfy a given level of demand by considering the joint impact of
demand and replenishment cycle (performance cycle) variability. The model
location planning was developed to indicate location planning to fix two or
more locations in a particular route of distribution. Finally, the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats of MRCMPU were identified with the
help of SWOT Analysis in order to evaluate the strategy of MRCMPU.
MAJOR FINDINGS
The major findings of this study are presented below. They are
followed by some minor findings and then the results of hypotheses testing.
MRCMPU states that its main problem is surplus milk during flush
season. The problem was analysed and found that on an average,
MRCMPU had 5.6 kilo litre per day (klpd) of surplus milk. The average
milk procurement of Palakkad and Wayanad districts (from 1991-92 to
2003-04) was 116.1 klpd. But the average milk procurement of
Kozhikode, Malapuram, Kannur and Kasargod Districts was only 48.8
klpd. Both Palakkad and Wayanad Districts procured more than 70
percent of the total milk that was procured by MRCMPU. On an average,
MRCMPU procured 71.0 klpd from Palakkad District but it could sell
only 34.0 klpd through Palakkad dairy (from 1991-92 to 2003-04).
Surplus milk of MRCMPU was the result of surplus milk from Palakkad
District.
111
On an average, the annual growth in procurement of milk of
MRCMPU was 15.2 percent as against 11.5 percent growth in milk sales.
The growth rate in milk sales was not proportionate to the growth in milk
procurement. That is, there was an imbalance between milk procurement
and milk sales. Moreover, milk sales per agency of MRCMPU showed a
steady decrease. It might be either the overcrowding of agencies or
inefficiencies of agencies in selling milk.
MRCMPU cited its next problem was growing competition
from private firms. The findings of this study are that about 71.0 percent
of the retailers experienced competition for two to three years. About
44.0 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that competition was
very low. But 30.0 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that
competition was moderate and above moderate. Moreover, 68.0 percent
of the retailers were of the opinion that competition had rarely or never
affected Milma sales. It showed that the intensity of competition was not
generally high. But its intensity was high in Malapuram District in
comparison to that in Kannur and Kozhikode districts. Other firms gained
more market share in milk and milk products where Milma was not
actively present. In Malapuram district, private firms sold milk and milk
products much more than what they sold in the other districts of the state
because MRCMPU was not keen about that market as it was far away
from its dairy in Kozhikode. Retailers in Malapuram District were of the
112
opinion that during the employees strike at the Kozhikode dairy, supply
of milk in Malapuram district was disrupted and it caused a shortage of
milk there. During this period, private firms made a smooth entry into the
market of Milma in that district. Except a few leading private brands,
most firms had no longer a strong presence in that district. Other firms
offered higher commission, provided credit facility to retailers, took back
the unsold milk and milk products, and encouraged hotels and restaurants
to buy their milk by advertising more fat content in their milk.
The effect of competition can also be measured by evaluating
the decline in the counter sales of Milma milk and milk products. In
Kannur District nine out of seventeen retailers (53.0 percent), were of the
opinion that the decline in the sale of Milma milk was 14.2 percent of
total milk sales, in Kozhikode District seven out of seventeen retailers
(41.2 percent), were of the opinion that the decline in Milma milk sales
was 37.4 percent of total sales and in Malapuram District ten out of
sixteen retailers (62.5 percent) were of the opinion that the decline was
24.6 percent and, in all twenty six out of fifty retailers (52.0 percent)
were of the opinion that the decline was 25.4 percent.
Similarly, in the case of curd sales, eight retailers of Kannur
District, three retailers of Kozhikode District, two retailers of Malapuram
District and in all thirteen retailers were of the opinion that there was
decline in counter sales of Milma curd due to competition. On an
113
average, in Kannur District, decline in the counter sales of Milma curd
was 10.4 percent of total sale of curd, in Kozhikode District it was 40.3
percent and in Malapuram District it was 38.0 percent. In the case of
sambharam, only one retailer in Kannur district was of the opinion that
there was decline in counter sale of Milma sambharam due to
competition. On an average, decline in the counter sale of Milma
sambharam was 16.7 percent.
Shakthi, Amrut, Arogya, K S, Taste me, were the major
competitors. In Kannur District, local brands such as Nimmees, Kepees,
and Prema sold curd at a price lower than the price of Milma.
In the case of competition from other private firms, thirty
nine retailers (78.0 percent) had average satisfaction, and eleven retailers
(22.0 percent) had high satisfaction. No retailer of all the three districts
had low satisfaction. As the majority of retailers came under average
satisfaction, and no retailer of any of the three districts came under low
satisfaction, competition was found to be at a moderate or a low level. It
supported that competition from other private firms was not the major
problem of MRCMPU.
One of the main problems of MRCMPU was high
procurement cost. The average cost of goods sold ratio of MRCMPU was
92.3 percent. The average ratio of raw materials to value of production of
MRCMPU was 86.0 percent. Milk procurement price of MRCMPU was
114
higher than that of MCDMU. About 80.0 percent of the selling price of
the milk was given by way of procurement price to the farmers. The ratio
of procurement price and transport cost to the selling price of the milk of
MRCMPU was higher than that of MCDMU.
Incremental value addition of MRCMPU was unsatisfactory.
The average incremental gross value addition, net value addition and total
value addition on value of production of MRCMPU were 0.1 percent,
zero percent and -0.2 percent respectively. More or less, cent percent of
the value of production was consumed by way of raw material cost,
production expenses, administrative expenses, selling & distribution
expenses and depreciation.
The average operating ratio of MRCMPU was 103.2 percent.
On an average 73.0 to 90.0 percent of total value addition was applied for
meeting employee cost and the remaining portion of value addition was
applied to meet interest, and tax. No portion of value addition is left for
returns to the owners. It showed that major portion of total value addition
of MRCMPU was applied for meeting employee cost.
The average debt equity ratio of MRCMPU was 1:1.3. It
showed that long-term debts constituted a major portion in the total
capitalisation of the Union.
In the case of delivery of Milma milk and milk products, 78.0
percent of the retailers had average satisfaction, 8.0 percent of the
115
retailers had low satisfaction and 14.0 percent of the retailers had high
satisfaction. As the majority of retailers had average satisfaction,
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity while delivering milk
and milk products. There was no significant difference in the case of
dealer satisfaction in terms of delivery of milk and milk products among
the three districts.
In the case of selling of Milma milk and milk products, 82.0
percent of the retailers had average satisfaction, 2.0 percent had low
satisfaction, and 16.0 percent had high satisfaction. As the majority of
retailers had average satisfaction, MRCMPU was in a position of
competitive parity while selling milk and milk products. There was no
significant difference in the case of dealer satisfaction in terms of selling
of milk and milk products among the three districts.
In the case of overall dealer satisfaction, 84.0 percent of the
retailers had average satisfaction, 16.0 percent had high satisfaction. As
no dealer of any of the three districts had a low score, no dealer appeared
to be less satisfied. As the majority of retailers had average satisfaction,
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in terms overall
retailers satisfaction score. There was no significant difference in the case
of overall retailers satisfaction score among the three districts.
On the basis of average scores ascertained, easy availability
of milk ranked first. Hygiene factor ranked second. Door delivery ranked
116
third. Brand image ranked fourth. Price of Milma milk was fifth and
reliable service of Milma ranked sixth. Suitable packing of Milma milk
ranked seventh. Lack of alternative source of milk was in the eighth
position. Keeping (shelf) life of Milma milk and pleasant flavour
followed in that order.
About 29 percent of the consumers were of the opinion that
they had to wait for supplies of Milma due to stock out. A little over 23
percent of the consumers were ready to wait upto fifteen minutes if
Milma did not arrive in time to replenish stock. Not less than 25 percent
of the consumers were ready to wait for fifteen to thirty minutes, and 29.7
percent of the consumers were ready to wait for thirty to sixty minutes.
About 8.0 percent of the consumers were ready to wait for one to two
hours and two to four hours each. About 6.0 percent of the consumers
were ready to wait for more than four hours to buy ‘Milma’.
About 89 percent of the consumers of Milma milk were of
the opinion that the same quality grade milk was not available at lower
price from any other suppliers. The finding is that majority of the
consumers of Milma milk had no alternative source of milk at lower price
than Milma. Moreover, 50.0 percent of the consumers of Milma milk
were of the opinion that other than from Milma, fresh milk was not
available during the normal business hours. They hardly use the milk of
other firms. But 42.5 percent of the consumers of Milma milk purchased
117
milk substitute for domestic use. Out of which, 86.3 percent of the
consumers of Milma milk used milk powder and the remaining 13.7
percent of the consumers used condensed milk.
About 23 percent of the consumers of Milma milk were of
the opinion that fresh milk was available throughout the business hours
from other suppliers, but milma was not. MRCMPU would lose about
one fourth of its consumers if supply does not reach within 15 minutes of
delivery time, again one fourth of its consumers within the next 15
minutes, and one fourth of its consumers in the next thirty minutes. It
would lose more than 78.0 percent of its customers if Milma does not
arrive in time. Hence MRCMPU must ensure availability of milk in retail
outlets whenever it is needed by the consumers.
Hygiene factor was the second ranked one. On an average,
1.7 percent of the consumers of Milma milk used other brands of milk.
The main reasons for not using the milk of other firms were poor quality
and poor hygiene.
Both households and non households ranked the factors easy
availability of milk, hygiene and door delivery of milk as first, second
and third respectively. Non households got milk at competitive price
from other sources but they preferred Milma milk due to its brand
reputation. Non households were not of an opinion that Milma milk could
be kept for long hours. Non households had alternative supply source for
118
milk. Leakage of milk was high in the case of non households as they
took large quantities of milk and they faced shortage of Milma milk too.
Door delivery of Milma milk was very poor in Kannur
district, whereas it was efficient in Kozhikode and Malapuram districts.
Consumers of Milma milk in Kozhikode and Malapuram districts had
alternative source for milk but not for people in Kannur district.
Both households and non households ranked first with regard
to the factor of easy availability of curd. Non households were not
satisfied with the price of curd. They could get curd at a price less than
that of Milma from other firms. Non households were dissatisfied with
the quality of curd and its packing. Brand image was given more
importance and lack of alternative supply source got no score from non-
households. It meant that non households used Milma curd because of its
reputation.
In the case of availability of Milma milk, 94.4 percent of the
consumers of Toned Milk in summer and 96.7 percent in monsoon and
winter had average satisfaction. 95.7 of the consumers of Milma Rich in
summer, monsoon and winter had average satisfaction. Cent percent of
the consumers of Milma Smart and Homogenous Toned Milk had
average satisfaction in all seasons. Hence MRCMPU was in a position of
competitive parity in the case of availability of all varieties of milk in all
seasons.
119
In the case of availability of Milma milk products, 98.3
percent of the consumers of Milma ghee in summer, and 96.7 percent in
monsoon and winter had average satisfaction. In summer 90.8 percent of
the consumers of Milma curd, 95.4 percent in monsoon, and 92.3 percent
in winter had average satisfaction. In summer 93.8 percent of the
consumers of Milma sambharam and 75.0 percent in monsoon and winter
had average satisfaction. 90.0 percent the consumers of Milma ice cream
in summer and winter, and 60.0 percent in monsoon had average
satisfaction. Hence MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in
the case of availability of all varieties of milk products in all seasons
except sambharam and ice cream in monsoon.
In the case of price of Milma milk, 90.8 percent of the
consumers had average satisfaction. 9.2 percent of the consumers had low
satisfaction. But no consumer had high satisfaction. MRCMPU was in a
position of competitive parity in the case of price of Milma milk. There
was no significant difference in the case of consumer satisfaction as
regards the price of Milma milk among the three districts.
In the case of price of Milma milk products, 75.0 percent of
the consumers of Milma milk products had average satisfaction. 16.7
percent of the consumers of Milma milk products had low satisfaction.
But 8.3 percent of the consumers of Milma milk products had high
satisfaction. MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in the case
120
of price of Milma milk products. There was no significant difference in
the case of consumer satisfaction as regards the price of Milma milk
products among the three districts.
In the case of quality of Milma milk, 65.0 percent of the
consumers of Milma milk had average satisfaction. 23.3 percent of the
consumers of Milma milk had low satisfaction and 11.7 percent, had high
satisfaction. MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in the case
of quality of Milma milk. There was no significant difference in the case
of consumer satisfaction as regards the quality of Milma milk among the
three districts.
In the case of quality of Milma milk products, 69.2 percent of
the consumers of Milma milk products had average satisfaction 19.1
percent of the consumers of Milma milk products had low satisfaction,
and 11.7 percent of the consumers of Milma milk products had high
satisfaction. There was no significant difference in the case of consumer
satisfaction as regards the quality of Milma milk products among the
three districts.
In the case of packing of Milma milk, 59.2 percent of
consumers of Milma milk had average satisfaction. Exactly 20 percent of
the consumers of Milma milk had low satisfaction, and about 21 percent,
had high satisfaction.
121
In the case of packing of Milma milk products, 77.5 percent
of the consumers of Milma milk products had average satisfaction. 11.7
percent of the consumers of Milma milk products had high satisfaction,
and 10.8 percent of the consumers of Milma milk products had low
satisfaction.
In the case of handling of consumers complaints, 91.7
percent of the consumers of Milma milk and milk products had average
satisfaction. 6.7 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and milk
products had low satisfaction, and 1.6 percent of the consumers of Milma
milk and milk products had high satisfaction. MRCMPU was in a
position of competitive parity in the case of handling of consumers
complaints.
In the case of innovation in marketing, 94.2 percent of the
consumers Milma milk and milk products had average satisfaction. 3.3
percent of consumers Milma milk and milk products had low satisfaction,
and 2.5 percent of the consumers Milma milk and milk products had high
satisfaction. MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in the case
of innovation in marketing.
In the case of scheduling of delivery time, 85.0 percent of the
consumers of Milma milk and milk products had average satisfaction. 8.3
percent of the consumers had low satisfaction, and 6.7 percent of the
consumers of Milma milk and milk products had high satisfaction.
122
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in the case of
scheduling of delivery time.
In the case of granting of agencies, 89.2 percent of the
consumers of Milma milk and milk products had average satisfaction. A
little over 8 percent, had low satisfaction, and 2.5 percent, had high
satisfaction. MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in the case
of granting of agencies.
There was no significant difference in the case of consumer
satisfaction as regards response of Milma to changing needs among the
three districts.
A large majority of the consumer respondents (82.5 percent)
(for the last five yeas) were regular consumers of Milma milk, and it
increased to 90.0 percent. Moreover, 14.2 percent of the consumers (for
the last five yeas) were the occasional consumers of Milma milk, which
decreased to 10.0 percent. It meant 4.2 percent of consumers (occasional)
of Milma milk became the regular consumers of Milma milk. Again 3.3
percent of the consumers of Milma milk (for the last five years) who
were the non users of Milma milk became regular consumer of Milma
milk. Non user of Milma milk (for the last five years) had become either
regular or occasional consumers of Milma milk. The current base of
regular and occasional consumers of Milma milk will remain with milma
123
in the future also. Hence MRCMPU can sustain its current rate of milk
sales in the next few years.
Of the consumer respondents, 59.2 percent were regular
consumers of Milma milk products (for the last five years), and this
increased to 60.8 percent by the end of the five year period. But 23.3
percent of the consumers of Milma milk products (for the last five years)
were occasional consumers of Milma milk products, and this had
increased to 39.2 percent. Non user of Milma milk products (for the last
five years) became either regular or occasional consumers of Milma milk
products. The existing base of regular consumers of Milma milk products
is most likely to increase in future. Hence MRCMPU can raise the sales
of existing milk products in future.
As MRCMPU can maintain current share of milk market in
future and it can increase volume of sales of existing milk products in the
future. There is only a low chance for consumers deserting Milma
products in the near future. As major market share of milk and milk
products was captured by MRCMPU, any change in the marketing
performance may lead to synergistic effect. Hence the various core
factors affecting sales of milk and milk products such as availability of
Milma milk and milk products, price of Milma milk and milk products,
quality of Milma milk and milk products, Packing of Milma milk and
milk products and response of Milma to changing needs were considered.
124
The study reveals that MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity
on the above mentioned core factors. It needs to take measures to
improve its competitive position in this respect.
Among non-users of Milma, 33.3 percent were of the opinion
that the price of Milma milk was low. Whereas 40.0 percent of the non
users were of the opinion that the price of Milma milk was average and
for 26.7 percent, price of Milma milk was high. A little over 83 percent
of the non users were of the opinion that the price of Milma milk
products was average. But 16.7 percent of the non users were of the
opinion that the price of Milma milk products was high.
From the survey of non users of Milma milk, 10.0 percent of
the non users were of the opinion that the quality of Milma milk was low.
Exactly 80 percent of the non users were of the opinion that the quality of
Milma milk was average. But 10 percent of the non users were of the
opinion that the quality of Milma milk was high. Around 27 percent of
the non users were of the opinion that the quality of Milma milk products
was low and 60 percent, average. But 13.3 percent of the non users were
of the opinion that the quality of Milma milk products was high.
About 63.3 percent of the occasional consumers of Milma
milk (for the last five yeas) increased to 73.3 percent and it would
increase to 76.7 in future. 36.7 percent of the non users decreased to 26.7
percent and it would decrease to 23.3 percent in future. MRCMPU could
125
reduce the number of non users of Milma milk by increasing the numbers
of occasional consumers of Milma milk.
A little over 3 percent of the non users of Milma milk
products (for the last five years) were regular consumers of Milma milk
products, this rose to 10.0 percent, but it would decrease to 6.7 percent in
the next few years. The proportion of occasional consumers (for the last
five years) decreased from 60 percent to 56.7 percent and it is likely to
increase to 60 percent in the immediate future. Of the non-users of Milma
milk products (for the last five years), their proportion among the sample
respondents decreased to 33.3 percent from 37% and it is likely to be one
third for the next few years as well. Non users (for the last five years)
became either regular or occasional consumers of Milma milk products.
OTHER FINDINGS
Other findings of this study are given under various heads such as
performance of KCMMF, Union wise competitiveness, dairy wise
competitiveness, retailers performance, customer service, non users approach,
common factors affecting the quality of milk and milk products.
Findings with respect to the Performance of KCMMF
The average annual growth rates of registered and functional
APCOS of KCMMF from 1991 to 2003 were 6.2 percent and 6.1 percent
respectively.
126
On an average, 93 percent of the registered APCOS of
KCMMF were functional and 7.0 percent of them non functional.
The average growth in farmer members and suppliers of milk
of KCMMF were 8.0 percent and 6.0 percent respectively.
On an average. 25 percent of the members supplied milk to
KCMMF. The overcrowding of members in a society influenced the
administration of APCOS, Unions and Federation
The annual growth in milk procurement by KCMMF showed
the highest growth of 14.2 percent in the year 2000. In 2003, it showed a
big decline of 9.9 percent over that of the previous year. On an average,
the growth in milk procurement from 1993 to 2003 was 5.3 percent.
The annual growth in milk sales by KCMMF showed the
highest growth of 12.3 percent in the year 1996. On an average, the
annual growth in milk sales from 1993 to 2003 was 7.2 percent.
On an average, the deficit milk of KCMMF was about forty
six thousand litres per day. It required the cross analysis of procurement
and selling of milk by the three Unions and variations in procurement of
milk in flush and lean seasons.
The average growth in ghee sales from 1997-98 to 2002-03
was 11.9 percent. The average growth rates of curd and sambharam sales
were 23.6 percent and -3.1 percent respectively. The average growth rates
127
of ice cream sales and peda sales were 32.1 percent and 25.0 percent
respectively.
Ice cream ranked first with regard to the average annual
growth rate and peda ranked second. Curd and ghee ranked third and
fourth, while milk ranked fifth. Sambharam came last in terms of sales
growth annually.
On an average, the annual growth in the turnover of KCMMF
was 10.4 percent. The average net profit ratios of Unions and KCMMF
were 0.2 percent and 0.4 percent respectively. On an average, the overall
net profit ratio was 0.4 percent.
Union-wise competitiveness
The average annual growth rates of registered APCOS of
MRCMPU and MCDMU from 1990-91 to 2003-04 were 10.3 percent
and 3.5 percent respectively.
The average annual growth in functional APCOS of
MRCMPU and MCDMU from 1990-91 to 2003-04 were 12.8 percent
and 2.9 percent respectively. In this case MRCMPU gains competitive
advantage, whereas MCDMU is in a position of competitive
disadvantage.
The mean percentage of defunct APCOS of MRCMPU and
MCDMU from 1990-91 to 2003-04 were 11.5 and 9.1 respectively. The
128
proportion of defunct APCOS as a percentage of total registered APCOS
of MRCMPU was higher than that of MCDMU.
The average annual growth rates of procurement of milk by
MRCMPU and MCDMU from 1990-91 to 2003-04 were 15.2 percent
and 8.0 percent respectively. In this case MRCMPU gains competitive
advantage, whereas MCDMU is in a position of competitive parity.
The average procurement of milk per functional APCOS of
MRCMPU from 1990-91 to 2003-04 was 316 litres per day whereas it
was 172 litres in the case of MCDMU. In this case MRCMPU gains
competitive advantage, whereas MCDMU is in a position of competitive
parity. MCDMU should improve it.
Milk procurement per supplier per day of MRCMPU was 3.0
litres during the period 1991-92 rose to 4.1 litres in the period 2001-02.
The average growth rates of selling of milk by MRCMPU
and MCDMU from 1990-91 to 2003-04 were 11.5 percent and 2.3
percent respectively. In the case of average growth in selling of milk,
MRCMPU gains competitive advantage, whereas MCDMU is in a
position of competitive disadvantage.
On an average, MRCMPU sold 151.0 thousand litres of milk
per day. On the other hand MCDMU sold 89.0 thousand litres of milk per
day (1990-91 to 2003-04).
129
On an average the annual growth in procurement of milk by
MRCMPU was 15.2 percent as against 11.5 percent growth in milk sales.
On an average, the annual growth in procurement of milk of MCDMU
was 8.0 percent as against 2.3 percent growth in milk sales (1990-91 to
2003-04).
On an average MRCMPU and MCDMU had 5.6 thousand
and 11.4 thousand litres of surplus milk (per day) respectively (from
1990-91 to 2003-04).
The average annual growth in ghee sales of MRCMPU and
MCDMU from 1991-92 to 2003-04 were 19.8 percent and 7.1 percent
respectively. In this case MRCMPU gains competitive advantage,
whereas MCDMU is in a position of competitive parity.
The average annual growth in curd sales of MRCMPU and
MCDMU were 23.1 percent and 21.5 percent respectively. In the case of
average annual growth in curd sales, both MRCMPU and MCDMU gain
competitive advantage.
The average annual growth in butter milk (Sambharam or
Lassie & Masala Majjige) sales of MRCMPU and MCDMU were 9.6
percent and 14.1 percent respectively. In this case MCDMU gains
competitive advantage, whereas MRCMPU is in a position of competitive
parity.
130
The mean market share of milk and milk products of
MRCMPU were 81.3 percent and 18.7 percent respectively. Whereas the
average market share of milk and milk products of MCDMU were 78.6
percent and 21.4 percent respectively.
The average market share of ghee, curd, sambharam (butter
milk), ice cream and peda of MRCMPU were 7.8 percent, 5.4 percent,
0.6 percent, 0.1, percent and 0.3 percent respectively. Whereas the
average market share of ghee, curd, sambharam (butter milk) and peda of
MCDMU were 12.1 percent, 7.4 percent, 0.3 percent, and 0.5 percent
respectively.
The average market growth in milk and milk products of
MRCMPU were 9.1 percent and 23.3 percent respectively. Whereas the
average market growth in milk and milk products of MCDMU were 7.6
percent and 23.4 percent respectively.
The average market growth in ghee, curd, sambharam (butter
milk), ice cream and peda sales of MRCMPU were 27.3 percent, 16.0
percent, 0.4 percent, 232.8 percent and 65.9 percent respectively.
Whereas the average market growth in ghee, curd, sambharam and peda
of MCDMU were 36.1 percent, 15.5 percent, 13.6 percent, and 28.9
percent respectively.
131
The average market shares of milk, ghee, curd and
sambharam (butter milk) of MRCMPU and MCDMU were 95.1 percent
and 98.4 percent respectively.
The average market growth in milk, ghee, curd, and
sambharam (butter milk) of MRCMPU and MCDMU were 52.8 percent
and 72.8 percent respectively.
In the case of market share and market growth in milk, both
MRCMPU and MCDMU gain competitive advantage.
In the case of market share and market growth in ghee
MRCMPU gains competitive advantage, whereas MCDMU is in a
position of comparative parity.
In the case of market share and market growth in curd
MCDMU gains competitive advantage, whereas MRCMPU is in a
position of comparative parity.
In the case of market share and market growth in butter milk
(Sambharam or Lassie & Masala Majjige) MRCMPU gains competitive
advantage, whereas MCDMU is in a position of comparative parity.
MRCMPU is more competitive than that of MCDMU as
regards the operational variables are concerned.
The net profit to sales ratio of MRCMPU was less than that
of MCDMU
132
Ratios of production cost, employee cost, administrative and
selling costs to sales of MRCMPU were less than those of MCDMU. But
the ratio of depreciation to sales of MRCMPU was higher than that of
MCDMU.
Dairywise competitiveness
On an average, the annual growth in procurement of milk of
Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies from 1990-91 to 2003-04 were
15.8 percent, 12.6 percent, and 13.1 respectively. In this case all the
dairies gain competitive advantage.
On an average, Kozhikode, Kannur, Palakkad and Kasargod
dairies sold 62.3, 57.4, 34.1, and 27.3 klpd milk respectively.
On an average, three fourths of the market share of milk of
MRCMPU was from Kannur and Kozhikode dairies (from 1991-92 to
2003-04).
The average annual growth rates of milk sales of Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies from 1991-92 to 2003-04 were 8.2
percent, 11.2 percent and 8.6 percent respectively. In this case all the
dairies gain competitive advantage.
The average growth in procurement and selling of milk by Kannur
dairy were 15.8 and 8.2 percent respectively. The average growth rates of
procurement and selling of milk by Kozhikode dairy were 12.6 percent
133
and 11.2 percent respectively. But in the case of Palakkad dairy, the
average growth in procurement and selling of milk were 13.1 percent and
8.6 percent respectively (from 1991-92 to 2003-04).
On an average, surplus milk of Kannur and Palakkad dairies were
1.3 klpd and 35.2 klpd respectively, whereas Kozhikode dairy had a
deficit of 28.9 klpd (1991-92 to 2003-04).
The average annual growth rates of ghee sales by Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies from 1992-93 to 2003-04 were 12.5
percent, 14.3 percent, and 13.0 percent respectively. In this case all the
dairies gain competitive advantage.
The average annual growth rates of curd sales by Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies from 1996-97 to 2003-04 were 15.1
percent, 30.4 percent, and 43.1 percent respectively. In this case Palakkad
and Kozhikode dairies gain competitive advantage, but Kannur dairy is in
a position of competitive parity.
The average annual growth rates of butter milk (sambharam) sales
by Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies from 1996-97 to 2003-04
were 12.6 percent, 31.0 percent, and 14.8 percent respectively. In this
case Kozhikode dairy gains competitive advantage, but Kannur and
Palakkad dairies are in a position of competitive parity.
Kozhikode dairy was more competitive than Kannur and Palakkad
dairies as regards the operational variables are concerned.
134
The average gross profit margin of MRCMPU was 7.7 percent.
The average gross profit margin of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 8.3 percent, 9.0 percent, and 6.1 percent
respectively. In this case all the dairies gain competitive advantage.
The average growth in gross profit margin of MRCMPU was
-0.2percent.
The average growth in gross profit margin of Kannur, Kozhikode
and Palakkad dairies showed zero or negative growth rate
In the case of average growth in gross profit margin, both Kannur
and Kozhikode dairies gain competitive advantage, but Palakkad dairy is
in a position of competitive disadvantage.
The average operating profit margin of MRCMPU was negative (-
1.0 percent).
The average net profit margin of MRCMPU was 0.4 percent.
The average net profit margin of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 1.3 percent, 0.6 and 0.5 respectively. In this case
Kannur dairy gains competitive advantage, but Kozhikode and Palakkad
dairies are in a position of competitive parity.
The average annual growth in net profit margin of MRCMPU was
0.02 percent.
135
The average annual growth in net profit margin of Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 0.02 percent, 0.3 percent and -0.03
percent respectively. In this case, Kozhikode dairy gains competitive
advantage, Kannur dairy is in a position of competitive parity and
Palakkad dairy is in a position of competitive disadvantage.
The average operating profit margin of MRCMPU was -1.0
percent.
The average operating profit margin of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 1.5 Percent, 0.4 Percent and -0.1 percent
respectively. In this case Kannur dairy gains competitive advantage, but
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies are in a position of competitive parity.
The average operating ratio of MRCMPU was 103.2 percent.
The average operating ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode, and Palakkad
dairies were 98.7 percent, 99.8 percent, and 100.2 percent respectively.
The average cost of goods sold ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode, and
Palakkad dairies were 91.7 percent, 91.0 percent and 93.9 percent
respectively.
The average operating expenses ratio of MRCMPU was 10.9
percent.
The average operating expenses ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 7.0 percent, 8.8 percent, 6.3 percent respectively.
136
The average ratio of establishment charges of MRCMPU was 4.0
percent.
The average ratio of establishment charges of Kannur, Kozhikode
and Palakkad dairies were 2.9 percent, 4.4 percent, 2.9 percent
respectively.
The average ratio of contingencies of MRCMPU was 3.4 percent.
The average ratio of contingencies of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were, 2.1 percent, 1.8 percent and 1.2 percent
respectively.
The average ratio of depreciation of MRCMPU was 1.3 percent.
The average ratio of depreciation of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 0.8 percent 1.5 percent and 1.0 percent
respectively.
The average ratio of other operating expenses of MRCMPU was
2.0 percent.
The average ratio of other operating expenses of Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were about 1.0 percent.
The average total assets turn over ratio of MRCMPU was 1.9
times.
The average total assets turn over ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 5.6 times, 3.4 times and 3.4 times respectively. In
137
this case, Kannur dairy gains competitive advantage but Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies are in a position of competitive parity.
The average fixed assets turn over ratio of MRCMPU was 13.7
times.
The average fixed asset turnover ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 14.5 times, 20.8 times and 58.5 times respectively.
In this case Palakkad dairy gains competitive advantage, Kozhikode
dairy is in a position of competitive parity, but Kannur dairy is in a
position of competitive disadvantage.
The average working capital turn over ratio of MRCMPU was
10.4 times.
The average working capital turnover ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode
and Palakkad dairies were 34.8 times, 2.0 times and 0.9 times
respectively. In this case, Kannur dairy gains competitive advantage,
both Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies are in a position of competitive
disadvantage.
The average inventory turn over ratio of MRCMPU was 101
times.
The average inventory turnover ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 108 times 126 times and Palakkad dairy was 119
times respectively. In this case all the dairies gain competitive advantage.
138
The average inventory holding period of MRCMPU was 3.6 days.
On an average inventory, holding period of all dairies of
MRCMPU was about 3 days.
The average return on total assets ratio of MRCMPU was 1.0
percent.
The average return on total assets ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 7.1 percent 1.7 percent and -0.2 percent
respectively. In this case, Kannur dairy gains competitive advantage, but
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies are in a position of competitive parity.
The average return on capital-employed ratio of MRCMPU was
1.1 percent.
The average return on capital employed ratio of Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 10.1 percent, 0.3 percent and 18.2
percent respectively. In the case of average return on capital employed
ratio, Palakkad dairy gains competitive advantage, Kannur dairy is in a
position of competitive parity, but Kozhikode dairy is in a position of
competitive disadvantage.
The average return on equity ratio of MRCMPU was 2.1 percent.
The average ratios of return on equity of Kannur, Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies were 15.4 percent, 4.4 percent 35.8 percent respectively.
In this case, Palakkad dairy gains competitive advantage, Kannur dairy is
139
in a position of competitive parity, but Kozhikode dairy is in a position of
competitive disadvantage.
The average debt equity ratio of Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad
dairies are in the proportion of 1:3.2, 1:2.7 and 1:1.8. It meant that long
term debts of Palakkad dairy were higher than those the other dairies of
MRCMPU.
Kannur dairy is more competitive than Kozhikode and Palakkad
dairies as regards financial variables.
The average ratio of gross value added to sales MRCMPU was 3.2
percent.
The average ratio of gross value added to sales of Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 6.2 Percent 8.5 percent 3.6 percent
respectively. In this case, both Kozhikode and Kannur dairies gain
competitive advantage, but Palakkad dairy is in a position of competitive
parity.
The average ratio of net value added to sales MRCMPU was 2.1
percent.
The average ratio of net value added to sales of Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 5.4 percent. 7.1 percent and 2.8
percent respectively. In this case, both Kannur and Kozhikode dairies
140
gain competitive advantage, but Palakkad dairy is in a position of
competitive disadvantage.
The average ratio of total value added to sales MRCMPU was 6.4
percent.
The average ratio of total value added to sales of Kannur,
Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 5.5 Percent, 6.6 percent and 4.7
percent respectively. In this case, both Kannur and Kozhikode dairies
gain competitive advantage But Palakkad dairy is in a position of
competitive parity.
On an average 73 to 90 percent of total value addition was applied
for meeting employee cost by Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies
and Union. It meant that the remaining portion of value addition was
applied to meet interest, and tax.
The average incremental gross value added on value of production
of Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were -0.2 percent, -0.5
Percent and -0.1 percent respectively. In this case, Palakkad dairy is in a
position of competitive parity, but Kannur and Kozhikode dairies are in a
position of competitive disadvantage.
The average incremental net value added on value of production
of Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were -0.3 Percent, -0.6
Percent, and -0.3 Percent respectively. In this case, all the dairies are in a
position of competitive disadvantage.
141
The average incremental total value added on value of production
of Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were -0.2 percent, -0.6
percent -0.3 percent respectively. In this case, all the dairies are in a
position of competitive disadvantage.
The average ratio of raw materials to value of production of
Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 84.1 percent, 81.9 percent
and 87.8 percent respectively. Comparatively raw material cost was
higher in the case of Palakkad diary and it was the lowest in the case of
Kozhikode dairy.
The average ratio of selling and distribution costs to value of
production of MRCMPU was 4.3 percent.
The average ratio of selling and distribution expenses to value of
production of Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 4.6 percent,
4.8 percent, and 3.3 percent respectively.
The average ratio of production expenses to value of production
of MRCMPU was 3.0 percent.
The average ratio of production expenses on value of production
of Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 2.9 percent, 3.0 percent
and 3.0 percent respectively.
The average ratio of administration expenses to value of
production of MRCMPU was 1.0 percent.
142
The average ratio of administration expenses to value of
production of dairies varied from 0.5 percent to 0.6 percent.
The average ratio of depreciation to value of production of
MRCMPU was 1.2 percent.
The average, ratio of depreciation to value of production of
Kannur, Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies were 0.9 Percent, 1.7 percent,
and 1.0 percent respectively.
More or less, cent percent of the value of production was
consumed by Palakkad dairy and the Union by way of raw material cost,
production expenses, administrative: expenses, selling & distribution
expenses and depreciation. Ratios of production cost, employee cost,
administrative and selling costs to sales of MRCMPU was less than that
of MCDMU. But the ratio of depreciation to sales of MRCMPU was
higher than that of MCDMU.
Kannur and Kozhikode dairies are more competitive than
Palakkad dairy as regards value addition variables are concerned.
Kannur dairy gains competitive advantage, Kozhikode dairy is in
a position of competitive parity, and Palakkad dairy is in a position of
competitive disadvantage as regards the operational, financial and value
addition variables are concerned.
143
Retailers’ Performance
46.0 percent of the retailers had taken up selling milk and milk
products of Milma as their main line of business. Exactly 54 percent were
selling some other products along with the business of Milma. For 91
percent of the retailers of Milma milk and milk products, their proportion
was 80:20 or more. For 61.0 percent of the retailers had one-fourth of
their sales turnover from Milma milk and milk products. Exactly 36
percent of the retailers had an experience that ranges between one and
five years.
54.0 percent of the retailers were satisfied with the morning
delivery of milk and 35.0 percent of the retailers were satisfied with the
evening delivery of milk.
42.0 percent of the retailers preferred early delivery of milk in the
morning, and 44.0 percent of the retailers preferred early delivery of milk
in the evening. More than 50.0 percent of the retailers in Malapuram
District preferred early delivery of milk in the morning.
20 percent of the retailers were willing to take late delivery of
milk in the morning and 26 percent of the retailers were willing to take
late delivery of milk in the evening.
144
64 percent of the retailers were not willing to take late delivery of
milk in the morning and 68 percent of the retailers were not willing to
take late delivery f milk in the evening.
98 percent of the retailers were satisfied with the present delivery
time of milk products.
62 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that the present
delivery system made no effect on size of order, 32 percent of the
retailers supported under - order and the remaining 6 percent of the
retailers supported over - order. Shortage of milk was possible as 32
percent of the retailers supported under - order.
44 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that milk was
always available, but 26 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that
there was occasional shortage of milk. As more than one fourth of the
retailers experienced occasional shortage of milk, it might be due to
under - order on the part of dealer, long lead time to deliver milk, under
capacity of dairy to meet the demand for milk.
95 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that ghee is always
available.
87 percent of the retailers experienced that curd was always
available and 6.5 percent of the retailers supported that curd was mostly
available.
145
A little over 95 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that
sambharam was always available.
About 93 percent of the retailers mentioned that peda was always
available.
Cent percent of the retailers were of the opinion that other milk
products such as ice-cream, Milma plus, Milma refresh were always
available.
75.5 percent of the retailers were of the opinion that Toned Milk
was the fast moving milk.
48.6 percent of the retailers supported that Milma Rich was
average moving and slow moving.
Majority of the retailers were of the opinion that Milma Smart and
Homogenous Toned Milk were average moving.
Retailers had no opinion in the case of availability of Milma
White and Milma Jersey.
46 percent of total milk sales were from Toned Milk sale in all
seasons.
Not less than 25 percent of total milk sale was from Homogenous
Toned Milk in all seasons.
Milma Smart contributed 15.0 percent share in the total milk sale
in all seasons.
146
Milma Rich contributed 12.0 percent share in the total milk sale in
all seasons.
Toned Milk was fast moving milk, and Homogenous Toned Milk
came next.
39.5 percent of total sale of Toned Milk (500 ml packets per
dealer per day) was in summer, 28.1 percent was in monsoon and the
remaining 32.4 percent was in winter.
41.0 percent of total sale of Milma Rich was in summer, 27.1
percent in monsoon and 31.9 percent in winter.
40.8 percent of total sale of Milma Smart was in summer, 27.5
percent in monsoon, and 31.9 percent is in winter.
38 percent sale of total sale of Homogenous Toned Milk in
summer, 28 percent in monsoon and about 33 percent in winter.
40 percent of total sale of milk was made in summer, 28 percent
in monsoon and 32 percent in winter. All varieties of milk sales were
high in summer and low in monsoon.
About 68 percent of the retailers in monsoon and summer, about
83 percent of the retailers in winter were of the opinion that ghee sales
were average and above average. 12.6 kg of ghee per month per dealer
was sold in monsoon, 22.0 kg ms in winter and 14.2 kg in summer.
147
62.5 percent of the retailers in monsoon, 77.7 percent of the
retailers in winter, and 95.9 percent of the retailers in summer were of the
opinion that curd sales was average and above average. 25 packets (500
ml) per day per dealer could be sold in monsoon, 36 packets in winter
and 59 packets in summer. Curd was fast moving in summer.
13.3 percent of the retailers in monsoon, 40.5 percent of the
retailers in winter, and 91.9 percent of the retailers in summer were of the
opinion that sambharam sales was average and above average. 9 packets
(200 ml) per day per dealer could be sold in monsoon, 17 packets in
winter and 35 packets in summer. Sambharam was fast moving in
summer.
Cent percent of the retailers were of the opinion that ice cream
sales were average and above average in summer. 1.7 litres per week per
dealer could be sold in winter 16.3 litres in summer. Ice cream was fast
moving in summer.
93.8 percent of the retailers in monsoon and summer, and 90.7
percent of the retailers in winter, were of the opinion that peda sales was
average and above average. 133 pieces per day per dealer could be sold in
monsoon, 106 in winter, and increased to 134 in summer.
About 58.0 percent of the retailers had net profit less than Rs.
2500 per month from Milma business.
148
About 64.0 percent of retailers were of the opinion that milk
booths varying from zero to two within one km radius of their booths.
Customer Service
About 93.3 percent of the consumers of Milma milk were of the
opinion that Toned Milk was always available in summer, 96.7 percent of
the consumers of Milma milk were of the opinion that Toned Milk was
always available in monsoon and in Winter. It showed that there was the
possibility of shortage of Toned Milk in summer season. In the case of
Milma Rich, 95.7 percent of the consumers of Milma milk were of the
opinion that Milma Rich was always available in all seasons. But cent
percent of the consumers of Milma Smart and Homogenous Toned Milk
were of the opinion that Milma Smart and Homogenous Toned Milk were
always available in all seasons.
In the case of ghee, 90.0 percent of the consumers in summer,
88.3 percent of the consumers in monsoon and 86.7 percent of the
consumers in winter were of the opinion that ghee was always available.
But in the case of curd, 89.2 percent of the consumers in summer, 93.8
percent of the consumers in monsoon and 87.7 percent of the consumers
in winter were of the opinion that curd was always available. It showed
that there was the possibility of shortage of curd in summer. Similarly, in
the case of sambharam, about 81.3 percent of the consumers in summer,
75.0 percent of the consumers in monsoon, and 68.8 percent of the
149
consumers in winter were of the opinion that sambharam was always
available. It again showed that there was the possibility of shortage of
sambharam in summer. In the case of ice cream, cent percent of the
consumers were of the opinion that ice cream was always available in
summer and winter. But 90.0 percent of the consumers were of the
opinion that ice cream was available in monsoon.
About 55.8 percent of the consumers were of the opinion that they
bought Milma milk on special occasions like marriage etc.
The average quantity of milk purchased per head (household
consumers) was 229 ml (240.5gm).
About 75.0 percent of the consumers of Milma milk bought Toned
Milk, 19.2 percent bought Milma Rich and the remaining 5.8 percent,
Milma Smart and Homogenous Toned Milk.
On an average, one litre of Toned Milk was purchased daily per
respondent, whereas the average quantity of 2.2 litres of Milma Rich was
purchased daily per respondent. The average quantity of the purchase of
Milma Smart and Homogenous Toned Milk was more or less one-half
litre.
About 81.6 percent of the consumers of Milma milk products
made monthly purchase of ghee. But 55.4 percent of the consumers made
weekly purchase of curd. Next to curd, 43.8 percent of the consumers
bought sambharam daily, 50.0 percent of the consumers made weekly
150
purchases of ice cream. But in the case of peda, 40.0 percent of the
consumers made weekly & fortnightly purchase of peda.
Purchase of ghee by household consumers was high in Malapuram
district. On an average, 826 gms of ghee was purchased per household
per month.
In the case of purchase of curd, Malapuram district ranked first.
On an average, 2.88 litres of curd were purchased per household per
week.
In the case of purchase of sambharam, Kannur district ranked
first. On an average, 300 ml of sambharam was purchased per household
per day.
Household consumers of Malapuram district bought ghee, curd
and peda in large quantities than in the other two districts.
On the basis of descending order of purchase of milk and milk
products, 75.0 percent of the consumers bought Toned Milk. 54.2 percent
of the consumers bought curd. 50.0 percent of the consumers bought
ghee. 19.2 percent and 13.3 percent of the consumers bought Milma Rich
and sambharam respectively. On an average, 8.3 percent of the
consumers bought peda and ice cream. About 3.3 percent and 2.5 percent
of the consumers bought Milma Smart and Homogenous Toned Milk
respectively.
151
On an average 82.5 percent of the consumers of Milma milk
bought enough quantity of milk for domestic use.
On an average 69.2 percent of the consumers of Milma milk
products bought enough quantity of milk products for domestic use.
On an average, a little over 4 percent of the consumers of Milma
milk products used other firm’s milk products. Consumers of Milma milk
did not use other firm’s ghee, curd and sambharam but they used butter,
cheese and milk powder of Britannia, Amul and Nestle. The main reasons
for not using the milk products of other firms were poor quality,
unreliable source, and poor brand image.
In the case of ghee, easy availability ranked first. Next to easy
availability, hygiene factor ranked second and competitive price and
brand image ranked third and fourth positions respectively. Reliable
service of Milma and suitable packing ranked fifth and sixth positions
respectively. Pleasant flavour and shelf life ranked seventh and eighth
positions, whereas lack of alternative source and door delivery got the
last position.
In the case of curd easy availability and hygiene factor ranked
first and second positions but lack of alternative source and brand image
ranked third and fourth positions. Reliable service of Milma ranked fifth
position. Competitive price ranked sixth position. It meant that the price
of curd was not competitive. Retailers of Milma were of the same opinion
152
that curd price of Milma was higher than that of other firms. Suitable
packing ranked seventh position. Pleasant flavour and door delivery
ranked eighth and ninth positions respectively and shelf life got the last
rank. It meant that curd could not be kept for long hours.
In the case of sambharam, easy availability, hygiene factor and
competitive price ranked first, second and third positions respectively.
Pleasant flavour and brand image got fourth and fifth ranks. Brand image
ranked sixth, while suitable packing, reliable service of Milma and door
delivery got more or less equal points. Shelf life got no points and ranked
last.
In the case of ice cream, pleasant flavour, competitive price, and
hygiene factor ranked first, second and third positions respectively. But
easy availability, reliable service of Milma and brand image got fourth,
fifth and sixth ranks, while suitable packing, shelf life and door delivery
got seventh, eighth and ninth ranks. Lack of alternative source got no
points and ranked last.
In the case of peda, pleasant flavour, easy availability, and
hygiene factor ranked first, second and third positions respectively. But
reliable service of Milma, competitive price and brand image got fourth,
fifth and sixth ranks respectively, while, shelf life, lack of alternative
source and suitable packing got seventh, eighth and ninth ranks. Door
delivery got no points and ranked last.
153
Exactly 45 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and milk
products were aware about the quality of Milma milk and milk products
by use and 24.0 percent of the consumers through advertisement and
through word of mouth. 77.0 percent of the consumers of Milma milk
and milk products were aware of brand of Milma milk and milk products
through advertisement. 34.0 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and
milk products were aware of price of Milma milk and milk products
through the retailers, 28.0 percent of the consumers through
advertisement and by use.
Availability of all varieties of milk products, price of Milma milk
and milk products, and packing of Milma milk products were the
strengths of MRCMPU.
Quality of Milma milk and milk products, packing of Milma
milk, handling of consumers complaints, innovation in marketing,
scheduling of delivery time, granting of agencies were not the strengths
of MRCMPU.
Non Users of Milma Milk
On an average, 1 litre of milk was bought at a time. 66.8 percent
of the non users of Milma milk bought milk from nearby household, 23.3
percent use their own milk, and 3.3 percent bought from near by society,
private firms and others.
154
Majority of the non users of Milma milk did not buy milk
products or they made milk products such as ghee, curd, and sambharam
in their home.
Average quantity of milk purchased per head (non users of Milma
milk) was 200 ml (210 gm) per day.
Majority of the non users did not buy ice cream and peda.
33.3 percent of the non users made ghee themselves. 46.7 percent
of the non users made curd themselves. 6.7 percent of the non users made
sambharam themselves. 13.3 percent of the non users bought ice cream
from other firms and 3.3 percent of the non users bought ice cream from
Milma. 10.0 percent of the non users bought peda from other firms and
they did not buy peda from Milma.
66.7 percent of the non users of Milma milk bought Milma milk
on special occasions like marriage. 16.7 percent of the non users of
Milma milk depended on nearby societies and nearby households.
80.0 percent of the non users of Milma milk bought enough
quantity of milk and milk products for their domestic use.
53.3 percent of the non users of Milma milk bought milk
substitute for their domestic use, and used milk powder.
43.8 percent of the users of milk powder bought 500 gm milk
powder in a month, 25.0 percent bought one kg of milk powder and 12.5
155
percent bought 100 gm and 200 gm of milk powder in a month. About
6.2 percent of the users of milk powder bought 400 gm of milk powder in
a month.
Non users of Milma milk ranked hygiene factor first. Next to
hygiene factor easy availability ranked second. Door delivery ranked
third. Competitive price ranked sixth. Hygiene factor, easy availability,
and door delivery were the influencing factors.
In the case of ghee, easy availability, hygiene factor and pleasant
flavour ranked first, second and third respectively. Competitive price
ranked fourth.
In the case of curd, hygiene factor and easy availability ranked
first and second respectively. But dislike of packed products and
competitive price ranked third and fourth.
In the case of sambharam, easy availability, door delivery,
competitive price and hygiene factor got same rank.
In the case of ice cream hygiene factor ranked first, easy
availability, maintenance of friendship and door delivery ranked second,
third and fourth respectively.
Common Factors Affecting the Quality of Milk and Milk Products
A little over 84 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and
73.3 percent of the non users were more or less aware of the quality of
156
Milma milk. But 15.8 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 26.7
percent of the non users were not aware of the quality of milk. Both the
consumers and non users were not highly aware of the quality of milk.
42.5 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 66.7
percent of the non users were of the opinion that the pooling of milk
from different producers of milk affected more or less the quality of
milk. 22.5 percent of the consumers were of the opinion that the pooling
of milk from different producers of milk did not affect the quality of
milk. But 35.0 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 33.3 percent
of the non users were of the opinion that it affected highly the quality of
milk.
47.5 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 30.0
percent of the non users were of the opinion that the quality of
pasteurized milk was more or less equal to the quality of cow milk
offered by households. 15.8 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and
36.7 percent of the non users were of the opinion that the pasteurized
milk was less in quality than the cow milk offered by households. But
36.7 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 33.3 percent of the non
users were of the opinion that the pasteurized milk was not less in quality
than the cow milk offered by households.
75.8 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 76.7
percent of the non users were of the opinion that they checked more or
157
less the fat and SNIFF contents when they bought the milk. But 24.2
percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 23.3 percent of the non
users surely checked fat and SNF contents when they buy the milk.
About 47 percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 73.3
percent of the non users were of the opinion that time interval between
procurement and delivery of milk affected more or less the quality of
milk adversely. 20.0 percent of the consumers of Milma milk were of the
opinion that it surely affected the quality of milk adversely. But 33.3
percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 26.7 percent of the non
users were of the opinion that it did not affect the quality of milk
adversely.
Two thirds of the consumers of Milma milk and 53.3 percent
of the non users were of the opinion that other firm’s milk and milk
products were more or less unhygienic. 8.3 percent of the consumers of
Milma milk and 16.7 percent of the non consumers were of the opinion
that other firm’s milk and milk products were not unhygienic. But 25.0
percent of the consumers of Milma milk and 30 percent of the non users
were of the opinion that other firm’s milk and milk products were surely
unhygienic.
RESULTS OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING
As mentioned in the introduction chapter, the following hypotheses of
this study were tested.
158
Ho.1: MRCMPU is competitive as regards the operational activities.
Three by Three matrix was used to test the above hypothesis. From this
Matrix, competitive advantage, competitive parity, and competitive
disadvantage of MRCMPU and MCDMU on operational variables such as
functional APCOS, procurement of milk (in Qty), procurement of milk per
functional APCOS, selling of milk (in Qty), selling of ghee (in Qty), selling of
curd (in Qty), selling of butter milk (in Qty), selling of milk (in value), selling
of ghee (in value), selling of curd (in value), selling of butter milk (in value),
were ascertained. Again competitive advantage, competitive parity, and
competitive disadvantage were sub divided into Low, Medium and High. Then
the values ascertained on the above mentioned variables in the columns Low,
Medium and High were consolidated. The total values in the competitive
advantage column were further taken as positive. The total values in the
competitive parity columns were taken as neutral (i.e. 0), and the values in the
competitive disadvantage column were taken as negative. The total values in
the column ‘low’ were multiplied by one, the total values in the column
‘medium’ were multiplied by two, and the total values in the column ‘high’
were multiplied by three. Then the final scores were consolidated. The total
scores of MRCMPU and MCDMU were compared to measure the competitive
position of MRCMPU. As per the consolidated scores MRCMPU got 25
points whereas MCDMU got 6 points. Hence the hypothesis is accepted i.e.,
MRCMPU is more competitive as regards the operational activities.
159
Ho. 2: Dairies of MRCMPU are competitive as regards the operational,
financial and value addition activities are concerned.
Three by Three matrix was also used to measure the competitiveness of
diaries as regards operational, financial and value addition activities. From the
consolidated scores of various operational variables such as procurement of
milk (in Qty), selling of milk (in Qty), selling of ghee (in Qty), selling of curd
(in Qty), selling of butter milk (in Qty), Kozhikode dairy got twelve points
whereas Palakkad and Kannur dairies got eight and six points respectively.
Hence Kozhikode dairy is more competitive than Kannur and Palakkad dairies
as regards the operational activities are concerned.
From the consolidated scores of various financial variables such as
gross profit margin, annual growth of gross profit margin, net profit margin,
annual growth in net profit margin, operating profit margin, total assets turn
over, fixed assets turn over, working capital turn over, and inventory turn over,
ROT, ROCE, ROE, Kannur dairy got thirteen points whereas Kozhikode and
Palakkad dairies got four points each. Hence, Kannur dairy is more
competitive than Kozhikode and Palakkad dairies as regards financial
activities.
From the consolidated scores of various value addition variables such
as gross value addition, net value addition, total value addition, incremental
gross value addition on VOP, incremental net value addition on VOP,
incremental total value addition on VOP both Kannur and Kozhikode dairies
160
got one point each whereas Palakkad dairy got minus three points. Hence both
Kannur and Kozhikode dairies are more competitive than Palakkad dairies as
regards value addition activities.
From the consolidated scores of various operational, financial, and
value addition variables, Kannur dairy got twenty points whereas Kozhikode
and Palakkad dairies got seventeen and nine points respectively. Hence it can
be conclude that out of three dairies of MRCMPU, Kannur dairy gains
competitive advantage, Kozhikode dairy is in a position of competitive parity,
and Palakkad dairy is in a position of competitive disadvantage as regards
operational, financial, and value addition activities are concerned.
Ho 3: MRCMPU is as competitive as its rival with regards to retailer
satisfaction.
“Cornell” technique was used in order to measure the retailer
satisfaction score. This score was measured under the following heads: - viz.
(1). Delivery of milk and milk products. (2). Selling of milk and milk products
and (3). Competition.
The statements were arranged in the form of five point scale so that
subjects could indicate the intensity of the attitudes of retailers for each item.
Weights were assigned for each item, the most favourable response
representing the highest value, and the least favourable response representing
the lowest value. Weight five was assigned to the most favourable response,
161
weight four to the next favourable response and so on. Weight one was
assigned to the least favourable response. After the total score was obtained
for each item, by adding up the weights of the categories, minimum score,
maximum score and average score were calculated. On the Basis of the total
scores obtained, the retailers were classified as low, average and high. Low
was equal to less than mean minus one standard deviation, average was equal
to from mean minus one standard deviation to mean plus one standard
deviation and high was equal to higher than mean plus one standard deviation.
When the retailers came under low satisfaction, MRCMPU was in a position
of competitive disadvantage, or when it came under average satisfaction,
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity or when it came under high
satisfaction, MRCMPU gained competitive advantage.
In testing retailer satisfaction score in delivery of milk and milk
products, the following variables such as packing of Milma milk, packing of
Milma milk products, co-operation of delivery persons in delivery of Milma
milk, co-operation of delivery persons in delivery of Milma milk products,
leakage of milk were considered. From the consolidated results of retailer
satisfaction score in delivery of milk and milk products 78.0 percent of the
retailers came under average satisfaction 8.0 percent of the retailers came
under low satisfaction and 14.0 percent of the retailers came under high
satisfaction. As the majority of retailers came under average satisfaction score
162
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in delivering milk and milk
products to retailers.
In testing retailers satisfaction score in Milma milk and milk products
sales the following variables such consumers complaints about the quality of
Milma milk, consumers complaints about the quality of Milma milk products,
consumers complaints about delay in delivery of Milma milk, consumers
complaints about delay in delivery of Milma milk products commission given
by Milma were considered. From the consolidated results of retailer
satisfaction score in selling Milma milk and milk products, 82.0 percent of the
retailers came under average satisfaction, 2.0 percent of the retailers came
under low satisfaction, 16.0 percent of the retailers came under high
satisfaction. As majority of the retailers came under average satisfaction,
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in selling milk and milk
products.
In the test for the retailers satisfaction with milma versus its
competition, the following variables such as intensity of competition, effect of
competition on the sales of Milma milk and milk products were considered.
From the consolidated results of retailer satisfaction score in competition, 78.0
percent of the retailers had average satisfaction, and 22.0 percent of the
retailers had high satisfaction. No retailer of all the three districts came under
low satisfaction. As majority of the retailers came under average satisfaction
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity as regards competition.
163
From the consolidated results of overall retailer satisfaction score in
delivery of milk and milk products, in selling Milma milk and milk products,
and in competition, 84.0 percent of the retailers came under average
satisfaction, and 16.0 percent of the retailers came under high satisfaction. As
no retailer of any of the three districts came under low satisfaction, no retailer
appeared to be less satisfied. As majority of the retailers came under average
satisfaction, MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in overall
retailer satisfaction.
Ho. 4: MRCMPU is as competitive as its competition with regard to
consumer satisfaction
“Cornell” technique mentioned above was also used in order to
measure the consumer satisfaction score. For this the following variables such
as availability of Milma milk and milk products, price of Milma milk and milk
products, quality of Milma milk and milk products, packing of Milma milk
and milk products and response of Milma to changing needs such as
innovation in marketing, scheduling of delivery time, granting of agencies and
handling of consumers complaints were taken into account.
About 94.4 percent f the consumers of Toned Milk in summer, 96.7
percent each in monsoon and winter came under average satisfaction,
similarly, in summer, monsoon and winter 95.7 percent came under average
satisfaction. But in the cases of Milma Smart and Homogenous Toned Milk,
cent percent of the consumers of Milma milk came under average satisfaction
164
in all seasons. Hence, MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity in the
case of availability of all varieties of milk in all seasons.
About 98.3 percent of the consumers of Milma ghee in summer, 96.7
percent each in monsoon and winter came under average satisfaction.
Similarly, 90.8of the consumers of Milma curd, 90.8 per cent in summer, 95.4
percent in monsoon, and 92.3 percent in winter came under average
satisfaction. But, in the case of sambharam, 93.8 percent in summer 75.0
percent in monsoon and winter came under average satisfaction. In the case of
ice-cream 90.0 percent of the consumers in summer and winter came under
average satisfaction. But 60.0 percent of the consumers in monsoon came
under average satisfaction. Hence, MRCMPU was in a position of competitive
parity in the case of availability of all varieties of milk products in all seasons
except sambharam and ice cream in monsoon.
In the case of price of Milma milk, 90.8 percent of the consumers of
Milma milk came under average satisfaction. 9.2 percent of the consumers
came under low satisfaction. But no consumer came under high satisfaction.
As far as the price of Milma milk was considered MRCMPU was in a position
of competitive parity.
In the case of price of Milma milk products, 75.0 percent of the
consumers of Milma milk products came under average satisfaction,. 16.7
percent came under low satisfaction, and 8.3 percent came under high
165
satisfaction. As far as the price of Milma milk products was concerned,
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity.
In the case of quality of Milma milk, 65.0 percent of the consumers
came under average satisfaction. 23.3 percent of the consumers came under
low satisfaction. But 11.7 percent of the consumers came under high
satisfaction. As far as quality of Milma milk was, concerned MRCMPU was in
a position of competitive parity.
In the case of quality of Milma milk products, 69.2 percent of the
consumers came under average satisfaction 19.1 percent of the consumers
came under low satisfaction and 11.7 percent of the consumers came under
high satisfaction. As far as quality of Milma milk products was concerned
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity.
In the case of packing of Milma milk, 59.2 percent of the consumers
came under average satisfaction. 20.0 percent of the consumers came under
low satisfaction, and 20.8 percent of the consumers came under high
satisfaction. As far as packing of Milma milk was concerned MRCMPU was
in a position of competitive parity.
In the case of packing of Milma milk products, 77.5 percent of the
consumers came under average satisfaction. 11.7 percent of consumers came
under high satisfaction and 10.8 percent of the consumers came under low
166
satisfaction. As far as packing of Milma milk products was concerned
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity.
In the case of innovation in marketing, 94.2 percent of the consumers
came under average satisfaction. 3.3 percent of the consumers came under low
satisfaction, and 2.5 percent of the consumers came under high satisfaction. As
far as innovation in marketing was concerned MRCMPU was in a position of
competitive parity.
In the case of scheduling of delivery time, 85.0 percent of the
consumers came under average satisfaction. 8.3 percent of the consumers
came under low satisfaction, and 6.7 percent of the consumers came under
high satisfaction. As far as scheduling of delivery time was concerned
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity.
In the case of granting of agencies, 89.2 percent of the consumers came
under average satisfaction. 8.3 percent of the consumers came under low
satisfaction, and 2.5 percent of the consumers came under high satisfaction. As
far as granting of agencies was considered MRCMPU was in a position of
competitive parity.
In the case of handling of consumers complaints, 91.7 percent of the
consumers came under average satisfaction. 6.7 percent of the consumers
came under low satisfaction and 1.6 percent of the consumers came under high
167
satisfaction. As far as handling of consumers complaints was concerned
MRCMPU was in a position of competitive parity.
RECOMMENDATIONS
From the analysis of this study, interviews with the officials of Milma,
experts in the domain, various officials of govt. departments and based on
information from the related literature, the following recommendations are
made that can be .
Marketing
It is found that product availability at retail outlets is a
critical factor for sales and customer satisfaction etc. Competitors gain in
market share when Milma is not present in a market or its supplies are
not adequate. Hence, MRCMPU must concentrate to eliminate the gap
between demand for and supply of its milk and milk products.
MRCMPU must build adequate capacity to fulfill the orders of milk and
milk products whenever it is required. For this, monitoring of product
availability in retail outlets on a regular basis and earnest efforts to
minimize stock out at any time of the day are essential. Hence, the new
business strategy for MRCMPU should have this as a major factor for
enhancing its competitiveness. It may also consider running milk and
milk product trucks to service retail outlets and major institutional
customers wherever and whenever they need Milma products.
168
As mentioned in the findings of the study, surplus milk is one
of the problems of MRCMPU and it was also found that it was the
Palakkad district that procured much of the surplus milk. If demand-
supply mismatch in Palakkad district is handled properly, this problem
can be contained.
Though the growth rate of milk sales shows an increasing
trend, milk sales per agency of MRCMPU shows a declining trend. It
may be due to overcrowding of agencies or inefficiencies of agencies. In
this situation, MRCMPU must make periodical evaluation of the
performance of agencies.
From the field survey, it is understood that MRCMPU can
enhance the sale of curd and peda when MRCMPU is ready to cut price
of curd and peda. When the price of curd is cut by Re.1/, MRCMPU can
compete with the other rival brands. If MRCMPU is ready to reduce the
price of peda and if it is adequately supported with promotion, the peda
sales can be enhanced because consumers are ready to buy peda instead
of buying chocolates of reputed brands.
Certain retailers were of the opinion that the attitude of
delivery persons is totally indifferent. These are not MRCMPU
employees. As contract workers, they have no long-term interest in the
organization. There may also be other reasons for their callous behaviour
like low remuneration, long waiting time in the dairy for taking delivery
169
of milk and milk products, and long travel, sometimes throughout the
night. Hence, MRCMPU must take measures to minimise, integrate the
retail network by employing own employees or engaging retail
relationship managers who must be in constant touch with retailers and
attending to their complaints and problems.
Generally, hotels and restaurants prefer milk with high fat,
because they can make more cups of tea or coffee from this type of milk.
MRCMPU mist produce and sell another variety of milk with high fat to
the hotels and restaurants alone at comparatively high price. In this case,
hotels and restaurants are ready to purchase such milk in large quantities.
Certain consumers are of the opinion that milk may be
unhygienic as the milk was supplied in containers. Moreover, quality of
milk may be deteriorated when the dealer opens the freezer frequently
for supplying milk to the consumers. Hence MRCMPU should take
initiative to remove this complaints and to aware the dealers to preserve
the quality of milk.
Door to door delivery is inevitable to enhance the milk sales.
But certain consumers were of the opinion that the dealer who made
door delivery charges Re. one per day. From the part of consumers it is
too much. MRCMPU must look into this problem.
170
Generally, the market share of Toned milk is higher than
other varieties of Milma Milk. But certain consumers were of the
opinion that the quality of Toned Milk was poor in general and the
quality of Milma Smart was poor in particular. Hence, MRCMPU must
focus its strategy to enhance the selling of Toned Milk by ensuring
quality of these varieties of milk.
Retailers are the strong link between the Union and
consumers. Hence, retailer’s satisfaction should be a major concern for
the organisation. The retailers had many complaints. Some of them were
of the opinion that leakage of milk was more and it was seen on the next
day. In such a situation, MRCMPU was not ready to take back such milk
packets. Hence, the retailer must suffer this loss. There was the
possibility of shortage in quantity of milk and curd in the packets.
Sometimes the delivery persons did not deliver the actual quantity of
milk as already ordered. In certain cases, urgent orders were not
entertained by Milma due to the lack of mobile services. Retailers
expected certain incentives from Milma during Onam festival, but it was
not given by Milma. Hence, MRCMPU must gather suggestions and
complaints from the retailers while distributing milk and milk products
and must take necessary corrective action.
MRCMPU must gather and evaluate necessary data
regarding the opinion of consumers, retailers, wholesalers, employees
171
and public about the performance of MRCMPU, various aspects of milk
and milk products, innovations and challenges in the milk and milk
products market. For this suggestion, boxes may be fixed in the APCOS,
retail outlets, dairies and chilling plants. Such suggestions and
complaints can be collected while procuring and distributing milk and
milk products.
Estimation of future demand for the product is one of the
important tasks of strategists. Certain methods like moving average, least
square are insufficient at a certain extent. As strategic decision revolves
around accurate results, sophisticated techniques such as exponential
smoothing, and linear programming can be applied in order to forecast
demand for milk and milk products.
As mentioned in the findings other rival firms gained more
market share by providing more commission, credit facility to the
retailers and taking back the unsold milk and milk products. In this
situation MRCMPU must ensure that retailer compensation is adequate
and on par with competition.
Production
As milk is a fast decaying one, it cannot be stored for long
hours in the dairy and in the retail outlets. Hence, the average stock level
and safety stock level must be computed by taking average demand and
172
average lead time. The amount of safety stock necessary to satisfy at a
given level of demand can be determined with the use of statistical
technique. The joint impact of demand and replenishment cycle
(performance cycle) variability can be considered to ascertain safety
stock and closing inventory.
The milk procured from far off APCOS must be processed
first in order to avoid decay of milk. . For this, working time of dairies
and chilling plants may be started earlier than the normal starting time.
Capacity utilisation of milk and milk products equipment has
to be raised in order to avoid idle time and bottlenecks in production
process. Under utilisation of plant, capacity leads to idle time and
insufficient capacity of the plant leads to bottlenecks. Idle time results
under absorption of fixed overheads whereas bottlenecks in the plant
results inability of production department to fulfill the orders in time.
Hence, MRCMPU must watch the optimum utilisation of plant capacity
to avoid idle time and bottlenecks during the production process.
As very thin films were used while packing Milma Smart, the
quality of packing of such milk was poor. Similarly, the curd filling
machine was not cleaned well, there was the possibility of the presence
of cockroach in curd. Hence MRCMPU must take necessary steps ensure
the quality of milk and curd in the production process itself.
173
Procurement and Distribution
Route optimization of various procurement and distribution
routes can be done in order to standardise procurement and distribution
outlets. In this case MRCMPU can reduce its transporting costs. For this
bench marking can be adopted with the activities of related firms,
competitors and unrelated firms.
The retailers have gained much bargaining power and at
times dictate terms to MRCMPU. Proper discipline must be ensured
throughout the distribution network with sincere supervision.
Location Planning
Availability of milk and milk products is one of the
responsibilities of dairy. For this, location planning by comparing the
total weight distances of each logistics centre can be followed. In this
case, a particular logistics centre or two or more logistics centres, which
have the lowest total cost, may be identified to ensure best customer
service.
Management Information System
Management Information system of MRCMPU must be
enhanced and made up to date. Necessary feed back system must be
adopted in order to coordinate the functions of various dairies, chilling
plants and Union.
174
Accounting
Performance of most efficient products can be ascertained by
comparing the unit cost and selling price of the products. In this case, cost
structure of each and every product must be determined. For this Activity
Based Costing (ABC) system can be followed in order to ascertain product
wise cost structure. Cost of each and every activity must be identified at its
origin. After considering the cost driver of each and every activity, cost can be
apportioned to various milk and milk products.
CONCLUSION
This study makes an attempt to evaluate the performance of KCMMF
in general and MRCMPU in particular and helps to formulate an effective
strategy to make it vibrant and competitive. As Milma is processing and
selling milk and milk products in large scale, a small change in the
procurement and selling price ultimately results high change in the earnings of
Milma at the end. Increase in the selling price of milk and milk products is
not the ultimate solution to solve the present crisis of Milma but it has to
control and reduce its logistics cost such as procurement, material handling,
inventory, transportation, packing, and warehousing as logistics cost plays a
dominant role in the total cost of the product. Survival and growth of Milma is
not the responsibility of Milma alone but the responsibility of farmers,
consumers, employees, public, govt. and the society as a whole.
175
top related