taylor young arch 390 assign 4_research project
Post on 17-Feb-2017
1.388 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction
Several Articles published by Science Daily and HortTechnology suggest that there is a relationship between green space use and a student’s perceived quality of life. These articles were also publishing the findings of a study that was done at a Texas University to see if there was such a correlation. The study was conducted via email survey, and undergraduate students were asked to respond to several questions relating to their usage of campus green space and how happy they were in their life. “The overall results from this study indicated that, in general, students who used the campus green spaces more frequently perceived their quality of life as higher when compared with those students who used green spaces less frequently. Additionally, undergraduate student use of campus green spaces was correlated with the individual areas of overall quality of life, the affective domain of quality of life of university students, and, specifically, the total positive affective dimension and the interaction with students dimension. These results suggested campus green spaces and their availability could potentially be a contributing factor in student retention, particularly among students new to the university (i.e., freshmen)” (McFarland, Waliczek, Zajicek).
My research is based on this study and the information presented in these articles, although I wanted to push it beyond what students perceive, and look more at the data to see if the same relationship was evident. For my research project I chose to investigate the relationship between acreage of campus green space and freshman retention rate at 6 UW System schools.
From reading these articles, that focused on green space users, it seems to me in order to get students to use green space on campus there first has to be some, and that’s why I chose the green space acreage as one of my variables. Quality of life in my research is represented by freshman retention rate, because so much of a student’s life is focused around the campus atmosphere, and if they don’t like that atmosphere, especially an undergrad-uate freshman, they are less likely to stay and or graduate from that university.
Process
Universities:I chose UW Schools because I wanted to see how this applied to schools close to home and that I was more familiar with. I chose the 6 UW Schools with the highest enrollment, these schools also are all located within a city that all have a density of a least 2,000 people/square mile.
•UW Eau Claire•UW LaCrosse••UW Madison•UW Milwaukee••UW Oshkosh•UW Whitewater•
Data:I found numerical data and statistics about the university and city from various sources on the internet and organized it in a spreadsheet. The campus acreage data is not something readily found on the internet, so I imple-mented my own strategy to find acreage of green space and recreational space. I used a scaled Google map of the campus and placed a grid over it, and then began filling in the squares according to what was on the map. I also included a 5 minute walking radius and filled in any public green space that was near campus, as I think the surroundings and what is directly accessible off campus plays a role as well. All the colored squares were then counted and translated into percentages, which then could be converted into acreage. This method is obviously not precise, but it gives a close representation as to what the make-up of the campus is like.
5 Minute Walking Radius
Campus Outline
Public Green Space: Parks, Trails, nature
preserves, plazas
Campus Recreational
Space (Outdoor):Athletic fields available to all
students
Campus Green Space: Parks, nature
preserves, plazas, landscaping, green
streets, lawns, forests
Campus Non-Green Space
RK
C HP P E W A
R E R
SIMPSONATHLETIC
FIELD
E
CA
CCM
SHIHH LL
UNIVERSITY DRIV
UNIVERSITY DRIVE
PUTNAMTRAIL
UUTTNN
MMD
RIV
E
GA D AVENUE
RR
CHIPPEWAVALLEY
TECHNICALCOLLEGE
NGNG
URSING
LOLOT
T
HSSLOT
MMCPHEELOT
MURRAY LOT
BRIDGMANLOT
RO
CHANCELLORSLOT
PUTNAMLOT
OAKRIDGE
LOT
STAIRWAY
MCPHEE CENTER
SUTHERLAND HALL
CREST WELLNESS CENTER
GOVERNORS HALL
OLSON ADDITION
HILLTOP CENTER
TOWERS HALL
OAK RIDGE HA
HORAN HALL
MURRAY HALL
CENTRAL STORES
CHANCELLORS HALL
HEATING PLANT
PHILLIPS HALL
THOMAS HAL
M TYRE LIBRARY
OLD LIBRARYSCHOFIELD HALL
HAAS FINE ARTS CENTER
PUTNAM HALL
FOOTBRIDGE
NURSING
S
© 2012 University PublicationsUniversity of Wisconsin-Eau Claire – Rev. 11/12
To reacClairemLexingt
PUS HILL area of Garfield Avenue is closed to all non-university vehicles.
M
M
C
M
M
C
M
M
C
C
FFF
F
FF
FFF
F
SSSS
S
R
R
R
RR R
G
GG
GGG
UUUNNNe
CENTER
E AVENUE
The CAMPis closed to
BOLLINGERFIELDS LOT
WEST HAMILTON AVENUE
ST
EIN
BO
ULE
VA
RD
B
BOLLINGERATHLETIC FIELDS
South ofUpper Campus(Not to Scale)
RECREATIONACTIVITY LOT
EE
LOWECAMPU
ERAMPUS
DISABILITY parking isavailable in all lots.(Guest permit must be obtaineddfrom Visitors Center.)
NORTH
University of Wisconsin Eau Claire
337 Acres
44 Acres
Public Green SpaceCampus Rec SpaceCampus Green SpaceNon Green Space
W AA
CRMC
EHTHOMATHOMHO LL
BRARYRARYYERUS
MCINT
S
YRE
CAMPLOWEWEA
M
DR
MMNN
AAMM
UP
UU
DR
ENew DAVIES Cw
G
UR
G
NUR LO
N
NURNURSINGGG
FFF SSS
GGGGGGG
K
C
PUTNANAM PARKRK
CENT
L
AL
MP
MM
USUU
CCCCM
P
TOPLLTHI
ORS HALL
HORAN HAM
HORANRR
NO
HRS
RN
RSOR
ER
NOT
PE
RNOT
PP
VERLO
UPAM
GOV
FFF
UCAAM
M
HALL
E
BRIDGMAN HHALLALL
FFFFF
M CC
FFF
GGG
TOWERSLOT
MAINTENANC
C
FFR
d CE/C
RE
R I VV
C
V E
C
EEI V
RFIELD
V
D A
V EEE
ARGA
M
LOPUT
L
H I P P
Campus Acreage EnrollmentUndergraduateGraduate
Freshman Retention Rate4 Year Graduation Rate6 Year Graduation Rate
LocationCity SquareMilesCity PopulationDensity
337
11,23310,578
655
83.2%23%64%
Eau Claire, WI32
66,6232,056 people/sq. mi.
University of Wisconsin LaCrosse
120 Acres
45 Acres
Public Green SpaceCampus Rec SpaceCampus Green SpaceNon Green Space
Campus Acreage EnrollmentUndergraduateGraduate
Freshman Retention Rate4 Year Graduation Rate6 Year Graduation Rate
LocationCity SquareMilesCity PopulationDensity
120
10,0749,119
955
86%33%69%
LaCrosse, WI22
51,7192,330 people/sq. mi.
University of Wisconsin Madison
Public Green SpaceCampus Rec SpaceCampus Green SpaceNon Green Space
936 Acres32 Acres
res
Campus Acreage EnrollmentUndergraduateGraduate
Freshman Retention Rate4 Year Graduation Rate6 Year Graduation Rate
LocationCity SquareMilesCity PopulationDensity
936
42,44130,36712,074
94.2%53%83%
Madison, WI85
236,9012,797 people/sq. mi.
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
73 Acres
Public Green SpaceCampus Rec SpaceCampus Green SpaceNon Green Space
Campus Acreage EnrollmentUndergraduateGraduate
Freshman Retention Rate4 Year Graduation Rate6 Year Graduation Rate
LocationCity SquareMilesCity PopulationDensity
73
29,72624,639
5,087
71.5%14%40%
Milwaukee, WI97
597,8676,164 people/sq. mi.
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
166 Acres
28 Acres
Public Green SpaceCampus Rec SpaceCampus Green SpaceNon Green Space
Campus Acreage EnrollmentUndergraduateGraduate
Freshman Retention Rate4 Year Graduation Rate6 Year Graduation Rate
LocationCity SquareMilesCity PopulationDensity
166
13,46112,232
1,229
75.8%14%50%
Oshkosh, WI27
66,3442,493 people/sq. mi.
University of Wisconsin Whitewater
400 Acres
134 Acres
Public Green SpaceCampus Rec SpaceCampus Green SpaceNon Green Space
Campus Acreage EnrollmentUndergraduateGraduate
Freshman Retention Rate4 Year Graduation Rate6 Year Graduation Rate
LocationCity SquareMilesCity PopulationDensity
400
11,62910,214
1,415
77.5%26%56%
Whitewater, WI7.3
14,7692,023 people/sq. mi.
Eau Claire83%
LaCrosse86%
Milwaukee71.5%
Oshkosh75.8%
Whitewater77.5%
50%Green Space
UniversityFreshman Retention
Rate
Madison94.2%
Campus Rec SpaceCampus Green Space Results by Percentage
Eau Claire
83%LaC
rosse86%
Madison94.2%
Milw
aukee71.5%
Oshkosh75.8%
Whitew
ater77.5%
100 Acres
University
Freshman
Retention
Rate
200 Acres
300 Acres
400 Acres
500 Acres
Public Green SpaceCampus Rec SpaceCampus Green Space Results by Acreage
Conclusion
Although the article in which this study was based on suggests that there may be a relationship between the amount of green space a campus has available and its retention rate my findings state that there is not a definite direct relationship between the 2 variables by either percentage of campus green space or just by the amount of green acre-age.
When comparing acreage with retention rate there is some-what of a relationship that can be seen, as the bars do create a downward slope overall, but it is not a true direct relationship because 2 of the 6 bars are not in sync with the downward slope of the bar graph. So overall this set of results could
suggest that there is a direct relationship between the 2 variables, meaning the more green acreage there is available the higher a retention rate a university will have, but further investigation with more univer-sities should be done to see if those 2 inconsistent bars really are just outliers of the trend, or if there is in fact no trend at all.
I also think it would be interest-ing to see how these schools stack up against the other US System schools, several of which are in rural or suburban areas, and not in the setting of a city like these 6 are. Given more time I would have liked to explore this.
Sources
Articles:American Society for Horticultural Science (2008, September 30). Campus Green Spaces Enhance Quality Of Life. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.sciencedai-ly.com /releases/2008/09/080929104611.htm
Websites:Google MapsU.S. NewsUniversity of Wisconsin Eau ClaireUniversity of Wisconsin LaCrosseUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonUniversity of Wisconsin MilwaukeeUniversity of Wisconsin OshkoshUniversity of Wisconsin Whitewater
top related