technology patterns for e-commerce web deployments

Post on 13-Apr-2017

29 Views

Category:

Technology

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Pick the RightIntegration Approach for Content and Commerce

Martin Tavener & Joe Toppe

Full video available: http://bit.ly/2eq3o45Also check out the White Paper: http://bit.ly/2dVWvJd

2

Your Speakers Today

Martin Tavener

CTO Customer Engagement SolutionsIBM Commerce, UK and Ireland

tavener@uk.ibm.com

Joe Toppe

VP Sales and Customer SuccessCoreMedia

jtoppe@coremedia.com

33

1. Why is this important for you?2. Integration Approaches

Pros and ConsCustomer Examples

3. Demonstration4. Wrap UpTime: 30 minutes

Pick the RightIntegration Approach for Content and Commerce

44

Why is the integration approach for content and commerce

important?

55

If you care about

The speed at which new functionality is brought to your sitesThe cost of managing your content and campaigns

66

If you care about

The time to market for a site(re-)launchAn easy to use toolset for e-Commerce and marketing teams

77

… then the approach used to integrate content and commerce

is important to you.

88

Wasn’t this a discussion a few years ago?

Yes. But things have changed.

99

Customer expectation.

Economy.

Technology.

1010

The Approaches

1. Commerce-Led2. Content-Led3. Hybrid4. Headless

Sidenote:

There isn’t one right answer.

11

1. Commerce-Led

N.B. CMS and DAM system may be one system technically.

1212

Challenged with:

Landing pages and non-product contentManaging promotional bannersBrand storesImprove existing siteNo re-brand

Example: Homebase

1313

ProsFastest and cheapest way to fix content quicklyLeverage marketing, personalisation and analytical capabilities of the commerce system

ConsExperience preview poor for editors unless deeply integratedTemplating in both systems

Commerce-Led Approach

14

2. Content-Led - Approach

N.B. CMS and DAM system may be one system technically.

1515

Challenged with:

Deliver content appropriate to their target groupsStarted withnon-transactional brand presence built on a CMSTransactional capability added later

Example: dm drugstore

1616

Content-Led Approach

ProsThe website can be designed creatively and include extensive support for editorial contentFront-end templates managed in one system

ConsVery expensive and costly to re-build all the standard commerce pages e.g. product filtering, PDP, checkout Need to consider PCI compliance

17

3. Hybrid - Approach

N.B. CMS and DAM system may be one system technically.

1818

Challenged with:

Lack of informative contentNot visually appealingMultiple online toolsHuge B2B product catalogTransactional systems working well

Example: Emerson

1919

Hybrid Approach

ProsCombines the best capabilities of both the Commerce-Led and Content-Led approachesAdd content experiences without rebuilding existing transactional flows

ConsDifficult to achieve without deep integration between content and commerce platformsRequires robust session management and integration

20

4. Headless - Approach

N.B. CMS and DAM system may be one system technically.

21

Example: YNAP

Challenged with:

Maintain a market leading position

Continue to deliver innovation

Manage speed of delivery required to support fast growth

22

Headless Approach

Pros

Truly scales to any omni-channel scenario, providing the ability to call the REST-APIs from any device

Completely seamless user experience across all underlying systems

Cons

The most expensive option, requiring re-building of e-Commerce and likely CMS front-end functionality

2323

Demo

Full Video Available:http://bit.ly/2eq3o45

24

Summary

There is no one-size fits-all solution.

Using the commerce-led integration scenario is a good way to get started, and it will allow you to improve the customer experience very quickly.

Testing the content-led approach in isolated sites or markets is a great way to move at your own pace and mitigate the risk.

The hybrid approach is best suited to combine the benefits ofcommerce-led and content-led.

The headless approach is viable when you have the skills and resources for rebuilding the presentation layer.

Mixing the approaches might be worth considering.

25

Whitepaper Now Available

Download the white paper: http://bit.ly/2dVWvJd

26

Thank You for Joining Us Today

Martin Tavener

CTO Customer Engagement SolutionsIBM Commerce, UK and Ireland

tavener@uk.ibm.com

Joe Toppe

VP Sales and Customer SuccessCoreMedia

jtoppe@coremedia.com

27© CoreMedia | 15 December 2016

Singaporeasia-info@coremedia.comtel +65.6562.8866

Hamburginfo@coremedia.comtel +49.40.32 55 87.0

San Franciscousa-info@coremedia.comtel +1.415.371.0400

Londonuk-info@coremedia.comtel +44.207.849.3317

Washingtoninfo@coremedia.comtel +1.703.945.1079

www.coremedia.com

top related