thai técnicas de investigación cualitativa y mixta

THAITécnicas de Investigación

Cualitativa y Mixta

S5. Análisis de redes sociales y métodos mixtos

Alejandra Martínez Monés 28 de septiembre 2010

2

Index

Social Network Analysis An example of a mixed method Tools

3

Social network analysis (SNA)

Considers relations and mutual effects of actors within groups and organisations

– Based on empirical data– Different levels of analysis (individual, sub-group,

community) Formal methods, mainly based on graph theory and

graph algorithms Fundamentals were presented as „Sociometry“

(Moreno, 1951)– Sociogram– Sociomatrix

4

Social network analysisSocial network

Set of actors (a person, a department, a company) and relationships among them

Examples: – “is a friend of”– “is a neighbor of”– “distributes goods to”– “is a member of”

5

Social Network AnalysisGraphical representation - Sociograms

6

Social network analysis Types of networks

Mode– One-mode networks: one set of actors– Two-mode networks: two sets of actors.

Affiliation networks: relationships between actors and activities

Complete vs. egocentric networks

7

Social Network Analysis Application areas to computer science

Human oriented disciplines– Computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL)– Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW)

Network Analysis– Identification of bottlenecks in computer networks– Fault-tolerance and –handling in distributed systems

Knowledge Structures– Growing interest in analysis of dynamic knowledge

structures, such as Wikipedia

8

Social network analysis Some indicators

Centrality of actors– Degree based– Proximity / Closeness based– Betweenness based

Centralization of a network Prestige of actors

– Indegree and proximity Groupings: Cliques, Clusters, Positions

9

Social network analysis Indicators - Examples

Individual: – Degree centrality: Activity of a node

C D (ni) = d(ni) = xi+

– Normalized degree centralityC’D (ni) = d(ni) / (g-1)

10

Social network analysis Indicators - Examples

Global: – Density: Global activity of the network

= 2 L / g (g -1) L, number of links; g, number of nodes

– Degree Centralization: Dependency of a single actor

CD = 1<=i<=g [CD (n*) – CD( ni)] / (g-1) (g-2),

CD (n*) = maxiCD( ni)

11

Social Network AnalysisSociograms

Who is central in this network?

12

Social network analysis Visualisation techniques

Teacher

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Intra-group

Inter-group

= 24,45%CD = 63,6%

CD (x00) = 81,9 %

CD (x21) = 9,1 %CD (x32) = 9,1 %

13

Social network analysis Data Collection and Transformations

Computer-mediated communication– Discussion Forums– Mailinglists– Web 2.0 applications, such as xing, facebook etc.

Archival records / artifacts– Bibliographies– Wikis– Versioning systems (e.g. CVS)

Automatically processable Potential for transformation between differenet

network types

14

Social network analysis Limitations of the method

Frequently not all of the interaction takes place inside a computer environment– People going for a coffee and discussing their

homework Interpretation is hard without „insider

knowledge“, i.e. replication is difficult Combination with other methods is useful

„triangulation“

15

Index

Social Network Analysis An example of a mixed method Tools

16

Research context

16

CSCL – Computer Supported Collaborative Learning– Emphasises interactions among learners

F2F / Distance / Blended– Technology and models to support the whole lifecycle– Validation in authentic scenarios

17

Research ContextEvaluation of CSCL situations

Overall research question: How to help teachers in monitoring participatory aspects of learning by means of technology?

“Validation” research question: How is the evolution of participation structures in a classroom supported by technology?

17

Integrate context Study of real situations Participants’ point of view

New forms of interaction

Visualisation processes Participatory aspects

Scalable and efficient processes

Research contextWhat we needed … Mixed evaluation

method

– Ethnographic data sources – Qualitative analysis – Automatically recorded data

– Quantitative analysis– Tools

– Social network analysis

19

Interviews QuestionnairesObservations Automaticdata

Phases

End ofproject

Throughoutthe

experience

Prepara-tion

Analysis methods

SNA

Eventlogs

Socio-metries

Socio-metries

Face to face interact.

Qualitative

Scheme of categories

Quantitative

Data sources

• After milestones• Critics about the

project

Final

Previousconcepts

(individual)Initial

After milestones

Daily work

Final

Conclusions

Mixed evaluation method

20

Index

Social network analysis An example of a mixed method Tools

– SAMSA– Quest, Iloca, Nudist

21

SAMSAUsage overview

ActionsFilter

Socio-metries

Filter

f2f interacions

Filter

SAMSADatos

Configuration parameters

SNA Indexes

Sociograms

Generic representation of actions

Output files

(Ucinet,

NetDraw)

Logs fromCSCL tools

22

SAMSAConfiguration Dates, actors, objects … Types of relationships

Indirect: mediated by objects(shared workspaces)

Direct: chats, forums, etc.

Person-object: use of resources

SAMSA Configuration

• Example of SAMSA configuration screen

24

ID Title Thread_ID

Parent_ID date Student

NameSchoo

l

21 Solutions of it is Energy Conservation? 3 0 2007-04-30 A41 A

22 I think it is too late for us to solve the global warming 3 21 2007-05-19 A5 A

<SESSION id=”Thread_3” date=30.04.2007><ACTION> <ACT.TIMESTAMP>19.05.2007 00:00:00</ACT.TIMESTAMP>

  <ACT.SOURCE ref="A5" /> <ACT.DESC> <ACT.DIR type="Debate">  <ACT.DIR.DEST ref="A41" />   </ACT.DIR>  </ACT.DESC></ACTION></SESSION>

Samsa in useWorkshop on interaction analysis approaches (CSCL 2009)

Analysis. Thread’s leader

• Thread 6: thread beginner is the thread leader

CDi(A25) = 46,7

CCi(A25) = 62,5

Analysis. Thread’s leader

• Thread 3CDi(A41) = 25,0

CCi(A41) = 52,0

Thread beginner

CDi(A5) = 58,3

CCi(A5) = 70,6

Thread leader

Analysis. Thread’s leader

• Thread 28 – School B

Detecting roles

DynamizerCDo(B20) = 16

CDo-sessions (B20) = 30,8%

CDi (B20) = 4 (17th value)

Isolated

Non-participative

29

Other analysis experiences

Analysis of collaboration in a clasroom using f2f observations

Analysis of collaboration in a course mediated by BSCW – Both in blended and distance settings

Analysis of collaboration in a problem-solving CSCL tool

29

30

Other SNA Software

UCINet – Whole Network Analysis – NetDraw – Visualization – http://www.analytictech.com/downloaduc6.htm

Pajek – Network Visualization (Large Networks) – http://pajek.imfm.si/doku.php

SAMSA – SNA applied to CSCL scenarios– amartine@infor.uva.es

31

Index

Social network analysis An example of a mixed method Tools

– SAMSA– Quest, Iloca, Nudist

Observations

SAMSA

Teacher /evaluator

DL File (UCINET format)

CSCL tool

QUEST

obs2xml

Participants

Answer to questionnaires

Interactions through the computer

el2xml

Event log

Interactionmaps

NUD*IST

Newcategories

Pedagogical tool

Evaluation tool or module

File

STATISTICPACKAGE

Categories

Statisticindexes

Tools - Quest

SNA indexes& sociograms

Actions

(XML)

Designs questionnaires RTF files

Tables

XML file

Observations

SAMSA

Teacher /evaluator

Configurationparameters

DL File (UCINET format)

CSCL tool

QUEST

obs2xml

Participants

Respuestascuestionarios

Interactions through the computer

el2xml

Event log

Interactionmaps

NUD*IST

Newcategories

Pedagogical tool

Evaluation tool or module

File

STATISTICPACKAGE

Categories

Statisticindexes

Tools – Iloca and Nud*IST

SNA indexes& sociograms

Actions

(XML)

iloca

34

Tools Qualitative analysis

Many tools NVivo (antes Nud*IST) allows to analyse

qualitative data:– Textual– Video, audio

Supports the researcher in “making sense” of the data.

35

Nud*IST Example – Coding data