the 2010-2011 new york state report card : …

Post on 10-May-2022

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

HAUPPAUGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

1

The 2010-2011 NEW YORK STATE REPORT CARD :

ACCOUNTABILITY & ASSESSMENT RESULTS FOR K-12 STUDENTS

BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATIONAPRIL 24, 2012

NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES

• PARTICIPATION RATE– 95% MINIMUM FOR EACH ACCOUNTABILITY GROUP OF 40 STUDENTS

FOR NYS ELA AND MATH ASSESSMENTS

• PERFORMANCE INDEX (PI)– A NUMBER FOR EACH ACCOUNTABILITY GROUP OF AT LEAST 30

STUDENTS THAT MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE EFFECTIVE ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE (AMO)

• ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE (AMO) – THE MINIMUM VALUE REQUIRED TO MEET ADEQUATE YEARLY

PROGRESS (AYP)

• ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)– ATTAINED IF ALL ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES ARE ACHIEVED

• GRADUATION RATE– 80% MINIMUM

2

• All Students• Ethnicity• American Indian/Alaskan Native• Black or African American• Hispanic or Latino• Asian or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific

Islander• White Non-Hispanic• Multiracial• Students with Disabilities• Limited English Proficient• Economically Disadvantaged

3

Accountability Groups

NEW YORK STATE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY CHANGES

• INCREASED CUT SCORES• LATER TESTING DATES• CHANGES IN METHODOLGY USED TO

EQUATE 3-8 MATH AND ELA EXAMS• ELIMINATION OF 34-POINT RULE FOR

SPECIAL EDUCATION SUBGROUP• REDUCED PREDICTABILITY OF EXAMS• INCREASED GRADUATION RATE

REQUIREMENT

4

5

The Tsunami of Improvement Schools

2009-10 2010-11 (Preliminary)

IMPROVEMENT STATUS NYC Rest of State Total NYC Rest of State Total

Improvement (year 1) - Basic 17 28 45 133 298 431

Improvement (year 1) - Focused 5 10 15 71 118 189

Improvement (year 1) - Comprehensive 52 19 71 182 79 261

Improvement (year 2) - Basic 12 6 18 5 12 17

Improvement (year 2) - Focused 4 10 14 6 13 19

Improvement (year 2) - Comprehensive 19 13 32 45 13 58

Corrective Action (year 1) - Focused 10 16 26 12 7 19

Corrective Action (year 1) - Comprehensive 25 12 37 21 19 40

Corrective Action (year 2) - Focused 7 13 20 10 14 24

Corrective Action (year 2) - Comprehensive 10 8 18 25 11 36

Restructuring (year 1) - Focused 5 6 11 9 9 18

Restructuring (year 1) - Comprehensive 13 9 22 10 10 20

Restructuring (year 2) - Focused 6 5 11 3 3 6

Restructuring (year 2) - Comprehensive 11 13 24 10 8 18

Restructuring (Advanced) - Focused 21 8 29 16 6 22

Restructuring (Advanced) - Comprehensive 103 40 143 118 60 178

TOTAL 320 216 536 676 680 1356

6

7%

1%

23% 23%

2%

45%

0%

22% 22%

4%

58%

46%

35%31%

7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Elem‐MiddleELA

Elem‐MiddleMath

SecondaryELA

SecondaryMath

Graduation

Percentage of Suffolk County Districts Failing to Make AYP

2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011

NYS DISTRICT REPORT CARD: ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERVIEW

REPORT In Good Standing 2011-2012

• ELA– ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL *– SECONDARY

• MATH– ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL *– SECONDARY

• SCIENCE – GRADES 4 AND 8• GRADUATION RATE

*DID NOT MAKE ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

7

NYS SCHOOL REPORT CARD: ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERVIEW REPORTS

FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

• ELA– IN BRETTON WOODS ELEMENTARY STUDENTS WITH

DISABILITIES SUBGROUP MADE AYP USING SAFE HARBOR TARGET

• MATH– IN BRETTON WOODS ELEMENTARY STUDENTS WITH

DISABILITIES SUBGROUP MADE AYP USING SAFE HARBOR TARGET

• SCIENCE

8

In Good Standing 2011-2012

NYS SCHOOL REPORT CARD: ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERVIEW REPORT

FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL

• ELA – STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES SUBGROUP DID NOT

MAKE ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS FOR SECOND YEAR

• MATH– STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES SUBGROUP DID NOT

MAKE AYP LAST YEAR

• SCIENCE – IN GOOD STANDING

9

IMPROVEMENT (YEAR I) – BASIC2011-2012

NYS SCHOOL REPORT CARD: ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERVIEW REPORT

FOR HIGH SCHOOL

• ELA• MATH• GRADUATION RATE

10

In Good Standing 2011-2012

3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT RESULTS

11

12

ELA 3-8 Performance Overview2010-2011 Annual Assessment

13

2010-2011 Hauppauge ELA Passing Rate

14

2011 Local District ELA Passing Rate

3-8 MATH ASSESSMENT RESULTS

15

16

Mathematics 3-8 Performance Overview2010-2011 Annual Assessment

2011 Hauppauge and Suffolk County Math Passing Rate

17

2010-2011 Hauppauge Math Passing Rate

18

2011 Local District Math Passing Rate

GRADES 4 & 8 SCIENCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS

19

Science Performance Overview2010-2011 Annual Assessments

20

2011 Hauppauge and Suffolk County Science Passing Rate

21

2010-2011 Hauppauge Science Passing Rate

HIGH SCHOOL REGENTS RESULTS

22

High School ELA 2011 Performance Overview

English Regents

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoringabove 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 317 98% 64%2009-2010 279 98% 62%2008-2009 300 98% 60%

23

High School Social Studies 2011 Performance Overview

Global History

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 357 93% 54%2009-2010 314 95% 53%2008-2009 284 93% 59%

US History# of

Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 309 98% 78%2009-2010 285 98% 72%2008-2009 300 95% 74%

24

Languages Other Than English2011 Performance Overview

Spanish Regents

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 184 92% 54%2009-2010 176 87% 44%2008-2009 174 98% 46%

25

French Regents

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 50 96% 44%2009-2010 48 96% 42%2008-2009 24 100% 92%

2011 Local District Regents Passing Rate

26

High School Mathematics 2011 Performance Overview

Integrated Algebra*

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 394 95% 46%2009-2010 373 94% 38%2008-2009 348 94% 40%

27

Algebra II / Trigonometry

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 303 63% 22%2009-2010 206 82% 44%

*Includes all 8th grade accelerated math and 9th grade students

Geometry # of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 337 89% 36%2009-2010 322 92% 36%2008-2009 230 99% 25%

28

High School Science 2011 Performance Overview

Living Environment

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 360 97% 57%2009-2010 357 96% 50%2008-2009 302 94% 38%

Earth Science

# of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 302 76% 34%2009-2010 278 82% 36%2008-2009 246 81% 39%

29

Chemistry # of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 256 84% 22%2009-2010 238 87% 19%2008-2009 206 83% 16%

30

Physics # of Students Tested

% of Students Scoring above 65

% of Students Scoring above 85

2010-2011 130 85% 47%2009-2010 119 94% 38%2008-2009 131 82% 35%

2011 Local District Regents Passing Rate

31

HIGH SCHOOL ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP)

RESULTS

32

English 2011 AP Mean Scores

Hauppauge Mean Score

New York StateMean Score

All Tested Mean Score

English Language and Composition

71 Tested3.63 3.22 2.92

English Literature and Composition

115 Tested2.72 2.86 2.81

Social Studies 2011 AP Mean Scores

Hauppauge Mean Score

New York StateMean Score

All TestedMean Score

World History65 Tested

3.15 3.03 2.57

United States History

111 Tested2.87 3.07 2.75

US Government and Politics

97 Tested2.64 2.78 2.67

Languages Other than English 2011 AP Mean Scores

Hauppauge Mean Score

New York StateMean Score

All Tested Mean Score

Spanish11 Tested

3.45 3.12 3.22

French3 Tested

2.00 2.74 2.78

German16 Tested

1.81 3.08 3.18

Math 2011 AP Mean Scores

Hauppauge Mean Score

New York StateMean Score

All TestedMean Score

Calculus AB25 Tested

4.28 3.00 2.82

Statistics23 Tested

2.78 2.93 2.81

Science 2011 AP Mean Scores

Hauppauge Mean Score

New York StateMean Score

All Tested Mean Score

Biology83 Tested

2.96 2.92 2.70

Chemistry12 Tested

3.42 3.01 2.77

Physics B38 Tested

3.50 3.20 2.92

Physics C13 Tested

3.31 3.51 3.48

Environmental Science

69 Tested2.19 2.86 2.66

HIGH SCHOOL PSAT, SAT, AND ACT RESULTS

38

High School ELA 2011 PSAT AND SAT Performance Overview

2010-2011 PSAT / SAT Performance

# of Students Tested Mean Score

PSAT Critical Reading GR 10 201 45.2

PSAT Writing GR 10 201 44.2

PSAT Critical Reading GR 11 166 47.9

PSAT Writing GR 11 166 45.4

SAT Critical Reading / College Bound Seniors 244 513

SAT Writing / College Bound Seniors 244 506

39

High School Mathematics 2011 PSAT/SAT Performance Overview

2010-2011 PSAT / SAT Performance

# of Students Tested Mean Score

PSAT Mathematics GR 10 201 47.2PSAT Mathematics GR 11 166 50.2SAT Mathematics / College Bound Seniors 244 530

40

2011 ACT Mean Scores

Number of Students Tested English Mathematics

School156

NYS52,255

School22.8

NYS22.7

School24.7

NYS23.8

Reading Science Composite

School24.3

NYS23.5

School23.3

NYS23.0

School23.9

NYS23.4

GRADUATION RATE

42

Graduation Rates & Diploma TypesClass of 2010

43

School District

Cohort Graduation

Rate

% of Graduates Receiving

Regents Diplomas

% of Graduates Receiving Regents

Diplomas with Advanced Designation

Hauppauge 97% 97% 67%Harborfields 99% 97% 68%Commack 98% 99% 82%Kings Park 97% 96% 61%

Sayville 98% 95% 65%West Islip 96% 95% 61%

GRADUATION RATE OVER YEARS

44

Year District High School NYS Standard

2010-11 97% 97% 80%2009-10 94% 95% 80%2008-09 96% 97% 55%2007-08 93% 96% 55%2006-07 97% 97% 55%2005-06 95% 96% 55%

HAUPPAUGE ACCOMPLISHMENTS• DEVELOPMENT OF MIDDLE SCHOOL

COMPREHENSIVE ACTION PLAN

• PLANNED CHANGE OF ELEMENTARY SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM TO INTEGRATED CO-TEACHING MODEL

• ENHANCED DATA-DRIVEN INSTRUCTION– TEACHER ACCESS TO BARS DATA– INQUIRY TEAMS

• DEVELOPMENT OF COMMON CORE MODULES AND UNITS OF STUDY

• INCREASED UTILIZATION OF PERFORMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENTS

• PLANNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF STUDENT SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING TOOLS45

• PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AT MIDDLE SCHOOL REGARDING USE OF DATA TO PLAN SPECIAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTION

• REVISION OF MIDDLE SCHOOL WHEEL COURSES

• PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AT MIDDLE SCHOOL REGARDING COMMON CORE-ALIGNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

• DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY BENCHMARKING

• DEVELOPED UNDERSTANDING OF LITERACY ACROSS ALL SUBJECTS

46

47

ANY QUESTIONS?

top related