the demand for cigarettes and other tobacco products · the demand for cigarettes and other tobacco...
Post on 14-Feb-2019
226 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
The demand for cigarettes and other tobacco products
Anne-Marie Perucic Tobacco Control Economics
Tobacco Free Initiative WHO
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 2 |
– “Jeffrey Harris of MIT calculated that … the [US] 1982-83 round of price increases caused two million adults to quit smoking and prevented 600,000 teenagers from starting to smoke … We don’t need to have that happen again” (Philip Morris 1987).
– "Of all the concerns, there is one—taxation—that alarms us the
most. While marketing restrictions and public [sic] and passive smoking do depress volume, in our experience taxation depresses it much more severely. Our concern for taxation is, therefore, central to our thinking about smoking and health" (Philip Morris 1985).
Price (tax) increases and tobacco use … in the words of the tobacco industry
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 3 |
The importance of prices for the tobacco industry
Cigarette Company Marketing Expenditures, by Type United States, 1975-2008
Source: Chaloupka for an upcoming WHO publication
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 4 |
Overview
Tobacco taxes, prices and demand – Relation between tax and price – Responsiveness of demand to tax/price changes
Impact on government revenues
Tobacco and poverty
Tobacco taxes/prices and demand
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 6 |
Why economists care about tobacco taxes
Tobacco is NOT like most other products – Addictive – Very harmful to users and to others in society
Tobacco IS like other products – Its demand responds to
• price changes relative to the price of other products • real income changes • changes in tastes and preferences
– We can apply the lessons of economics to reduce its use
6
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 7 |
Few close substitutes
About 75% of tobacco leaves grown globally are used for cigarettes
Relatively small variety of tobacco products – Smoked: Cigarettes, Roll Your Own (RYO), Kreteks (clove
cigarettes), bidis, cigars, pipes, waterpies – Smokeless: Chewing tobacco (incl. Guthka), snuff (incl. Swedish
snus)
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 8 |
Taxes and prices
An effective tax increase should increase prices of tobacco products and make them less affordable
Tobacco industry is an oligopoly (large number of consumers and small number of producers)
– Industry tends to fully shift the tax increase to consumers rather than absorbing it,
– Often, we can see cases of overshifting (when the industry ends up increasing the price by more than the consequence of the tax increase to augment its profit margin),
• This is more the case in jurisdictions with specific excise taxes
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 9 |
Taxes, prices and demand
Increases in taxes that increase prices above inflation, will:
– Encourage some tobacco users to quit – Make some reduce their consumption – Prevent some formers users from starting again – Prevent some potential new users from taking up the
habit – When cheaper substitutable tobacco products/brands are
available, encourage some to substitute their consumption to those products/brands
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 10 |
Prices, demand and lung cancer deaths
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005Year
Numb
er/ad
ult/da
y
50
100
150
200
250
300
Price/
Death
s (%
Relat
ive to
1980) Lung Cancer Deaths:
males age 35-44/4
Relative Price
Number cigarettes/adult/day
Cigarette Prices, Cigarette Consumption, and Male Lung Cancer Deaths France, 1980-2005
Source: Jha, 2009
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 11 |
Tobacco taxes and prevalence UK example
Source: Excise tax yield: EU TAXUD; Prevalence: Cancer Research UK
100
120
140
160
180
200
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
GBP
1517192123252729
%
Real excise tax yield (GBP per 1000 cigarettes)Smoking prevalence, males
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 12 |
Prices and Consumption
Law of demand: all other factors held constant, the quantity demanded of a product falls as price rises
Higher taxes reduce tobacco consumption – By how much?
The Price elasticity of demand measures how much demand would change following a price change:
– % change in the number of cigarettes consumed that results from a one-percent increase in (the inflation adjusted) price of cigarettes.
12
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 13 |
Price elasticity of demand
Formula:
Sign: <0 because as P↑, Q↓ (and vice versa)
For e.g. a price elasticity of -0.4 indicates that as prices increase by 10%, demand will go down by 4%
13
1
1
12
12
//
QP
PPQQ
PpQQ
×−−
=∆∆
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 14 |
Relatively inelastic demand
Demand theory applies to tobacco products as well and consumption goes down when price increases
but because of addictive nature of tobacco products, tobacco demand is not very sensitive to price changes
– price elasticity is between 0 and -1 (its absolute value is smaller than 1) as % Δ consumption < % Δ price
– but as time goes by people adjust to a price change and are expected to reduce their consumption further
• In the long run, price elasticity is estimated to be higher (more sensitivity) than in the short run
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 15 |
Price elasticity
Total (own) price elasticity - the effect of cigarette price increase on the total amount of cigarettes bought
Combines – Effect of higher price on prevalence: how many
smokers stop smoking? – Effect on amount smoked by remaining smokers: how
many less packs per day
Demand will also be affected by changes in prices of alternative products such as fine cut tobacco for roll your own or pipes, or cigars or bidis etc
– Cross price elasticity
15
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 16 |
Price elasticity estimates
Estimates of price elasticites of cigarette demand in high-income ~ -0.4
For low and middle income countries, most estimates lie between -0.2 and -0.8
Effect of price: – Half is on smoking prevalence – Half on the intensity of smoking (quantity consumed)
(estimates of prevalence among adults)
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 17 |
Price elasticity data sources
Price elasticities can be calculated from two types of data sources: – Aggregate data (time series)
• Easy and not costly to collect • But cannot tell why consumption went down (reduction in smokers or reduction
in quantity smoked?) • Fail to provide insight in variations in age, sex, income and education
distribution in tobacco users • Looks only at the impact of change in prices on legal sales
– Survey (individual and household level) data: • Can separate the impact on consumption trough reduction in prevalence or
quantity used and measure reaction by socio economic status • Can capture total consumption (legal and illegal sales) and therefore the impact
of price changes on overall consumption • But are more costly and complicated to collect • And can suffer from reporting biases (people underreporting their consumption)
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 18 |
Price elasticity estimates
Estimates from countries in the EU: – United Kingdom: -0.41 to -0.48 (2006, aggregate data) – Sweden: -0.81 (2004, long-run, aggregate) – Netherlands: -0.45 to -1.03 (2000) – Italy: (2009, aggregate)
• -0.09 to -0.34 (short run) • -0.31 to -1.07 (long run)
– Estonia: -0.34 (2004, survey data) – Poland: -0.4 (short run), -0.7 (long run) (2004, survey data)
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 19 |
Price elasticity among the youth and the poor
Youth are more responsive to price increases – Most estimates lie between -0.5 and -1.2 in high-income
countries – Two to three times the estimates for adults
Tobacco use is inversely related to indicators of socio-economic status
– Responsiveness to price increases higher among the poor than the rich in high-income countries
– Less evident in other countries maybe due to extent of opportunity for tax avoidance and evasion
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 20 |
Example
Total consumption of cigarettes Q1 = 100,000 packs (20 cig)
Price (P1) = 6 Eur / pack Specific tax (t1) = 3.5 Eur
Tax increase of 1.5 Eur => t2 = 5 Eur
Tax fully passed on to consumer P2 = 6+1.5 = 7.5 Eur
Market impact: consumption goes down to Q2 = 87,000 packs
Price elasticity:
52.0000,100
665.7
000,87000,100
1
1
12
12 −=×−−
=×−−
QP
PPQQ
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 21 |
Income elasticity
Evidence suggests that income growth has also an influence on consumption (affordability)
– Most estimates of income-elasticity lie between 0 and 1 indicating that as income increases consumption will increase to a certain extent.
• Evidence of declining income elasticities in the USA
Government revenues
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 23 |
Efficient revenue generation
Historically, the primary motive - still true in many countries today
Tobacco taxes are a very efficient source of revenue given: – Low share of tax in price in most countries – Relatively inelastic demand for tobacco products
23
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 24 |
Efficient revenue generation: Relatively inelastic demand
Taxes increase prices, reduce demand
But if demand falls by more than the increase in price, tax revenues will decline
Relatively inelastic demand (e.g. -0.4) implies revenues actually rise.
A tax-induced increase in price – Reduces consumption : Win for public health – But reduces consumption by less than 10 percent: Win for tax revenues, certainly in the short and medium terms
24
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 25 |
Example
Q2 = 87,000 packs; P2 = 7.5 Eur; t2 = 5 Eur
Price-elasticity = -0.52
Tax increase to t3 = 6.5 leads to P3 = 9 => price increase = 20%
The impact on consumption: – Price-elasticity x price change = -0.52 x 20% = -10.4% – Q3 = Q2 –(10.4% x Q2 )= 77,952 packs
Revenue impact: – R2 = Q2 x t2 = 87,000 x 5 = 435,000 Eur – R3 = Q3 x t3 = 77,952 x 6.5 = 506,688 Eur – Revenue increase of 16% despite a decrease in consumption of 10.4%
Tobacco and poverty
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 27 |
Tobacco Taxes and the Poor
Regressive tax: A tax that takes a larger percentage of the income of low income groups than higher income groups.
Share of income spent on tobacco generally falls as income rises
• Implies tobacco taxes are regressive in that tax burden is greater on lower income
Prevalence of tobacco use is higher among the poor • Health burden of tobacco use also falls more heavily on lower income
persons • Tobacco use contributes to poverty
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 28 |
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 29 |
But poor are more sensitive to price changes
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 30 |
Higher price sensitivity among poor
Evidence from Turkey in 2003
Price Elasticity (sensitivity) in 2003 by expenditure group
Expenditure groups
Elasticity of smoking
participation
Conditional Demand elasticity
Total price
elasticity
The poorest -0,51 -0,60 -1,10
Poor -0,41 -0,58 -0,99
Middle -0,39 -0,46 -0,85
Upper Middle -0,41 -0,36 -0,77
Rich -0,45 -0,37 -0,82
Total -0,40 -0,47 -0,87
Total price elasticity -0.87
A 10% increase in tax would reduce consumption by 8.7%.
Within this reduction – 4% would quit smoking – Consumption would go down by
4.7%
Source: Onder & Yurekli 2006
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 31 |
Tax increases may be progressive
Lower SES populations are more price responsive
Tax increases
higher reductions among low SES where prevalence is highest
Higher impact in terms of life saving because mortality higher among low SES
– Implies tax increases may be progressive
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 32 |
Higher taxes are Pro-Poor Policy
Higher taxes lead to higher revenues which enables governments to allocate more tax revenues for social programs and health systems. This is a Pro-Poor Policy
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 33 |
Bottom line
Cigarette tax increases will NOT negatively impact on the lowest income populations
BECAUSE – Poor smokers bear disproportionate share of health
consequences from smoking and are more responsive to price increases
– Policy makers should consider progressivity or regressivity of overall fiscal system
– Negative impact can be offset by the use of new/extra revenue to support programs targeting vulnerable populations or protect funding for existing programs
TobTaxy Capacity Building Workshop | 20-22 February 2012, Dublin, Ireland 34 |
Conclusions
There is a strong justification for taxing tobacco for the country's benefit (public health and economy):
– Tax increases raise prices in the tobacco sector – Price increases reduce consumption and improve health – And at the same time increases revenues
Price elasticity is an important instrument to measure the impact of tax/price increases on consumption
– The young and the poor have a higher price elasticity
Taxes are regressive but tax increases can be progressive
top related