the pore size distribution of naturally porous cigarette

Post on 19-Apr-2022

5 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

The Pore Size Distribution of

Naturally Porous Cigarette Papers and

its Relation to Air Permeability and Diffusion Capacity

Part 1

Delfortgroup AG, Ludwig-Lassl-Straße 15, 6112 Wattens, Austria

Québec, Canada

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Contents

2

Objectives

Procedure

Sample Sets

Results

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Porosity of paper

3

micropore

dead-end pores

interlayer

mesopore

macropore

closed pore

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Detection of porosity: indirect

4

Air permeability (Z):

air flow driven by a pressure difference

Diffusion capacity (D*):

air flow driven by a concentration difference

diffusion

capacity

[cm/s]

permeability [CU]

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Detection of porosity: direct

5

Mercury (Hg) porosimetry

Non-wetting liquid cannot enter pores spontaneously

forced into the pores by application of external pressure

required equilibrated pressure is inversely proportional to the pore

size

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Detection of porosity: direct

6

P0 P1 P2 P3< < <

V0 V1 V2 V3< < <

volume

pressure

Hg-column

porous sample

University of Innsbruck – Institute of Pharmacy; Pharmaceutical technologies; Mag. pharm. Dr. rer. nat. Michael F. Noisternig

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Assumptions

7

Pore size vs. paper porosity

small pores more effect on diffusion capacity

larger pores more effect on air permeability

Correlations between direct and indirect method?

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0.01 0.1 1 10

relative Volume [mm3/g]

Pore Radius [µm]

Assumptions

8

diffusion capacity

(D*)

permeability

(Z)

D* and Z

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Equipment

9

Pascal 140

0.01 kPa – 400 kPa (low pressure - LP)

Pore radius: 300 µm - 1.9 µm

Porosimeter 2000

0.1 MPa – 200 MPa (high pressure - HP)

Pore radius: until 3.7 nm

University of Innsbruck – Institute of Pharmacy; Pharmaceutical technologies; Mag. pharm. Dr. rer. nat. Michael F. Noisternig

University of Innsbruck – Institute of Pharmacy; Pharmaceutical technologies; Mag. pharm. Dr. rer. nat. Michael F. Noisternig

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Procedure

10

Defined amount of paper into dilatometer with small amount of Hg

Sealing with capillary and final sealing

Gravimetric analysis before measurement

First LP-, then HP-analysis

Transfer of data to software

Combination of LP and HP measurements to pore size distribution

curve

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Cigarette paper sample sets

11

samplepermeability

[CU]

chalk content

[gsm]

burn additive

[%]furnish

25 CU 25 7 1 wood

50 CU 50 7 1 wood

7 gsm 50 7 1 wood

10 gsm 50 10 1 wood

2% B.A 75 7 2 wood

wood 75 7 2 wood

flax 75 7 2 flax

set 1: permeability

set 2: chalk content

set 3: thermal decomposition

set 4: furnish

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0.01 0.1 1 10

relative volume [mm3/g]

pore radius [µm]

SET 1: air permeability

12

sample permeability

[CU]

diffusion capacity

[cm/s]

23 1.18

48 1.58

medium small

large

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0.01 0.1 1 10

relative volume [mm3/g]

pore radius [µm]

SET 2: chalk content

13

sample permeability

[CU]

diffusion capacity

[cm/s]

48 1.58

51 1.84

medium small

large

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0.01 0.1 1 10

relative volume [mm3/g]

pore radius [µm]

SET 3: thermal decomposition

14

sample permeability

[CU]

diffusion capacity

[cm/s]

71 1.50

99 1.98

medium small

large

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0.01 0.1 1 10

relative volume [mm3/g]

pore radius [µm]

SET 4: furnish

15

sample permeability

[CU]

diffusion capacity

[cm/s]

71 1.50

68 2.04

medium small

large

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Summary

16

Detection of paper porosity

indirect: air permeability, diffusion capacity

direct: Hg-porosimetry

4 sets for investigation of effect on pore size distribution

Correlation of direct and indirect method

section 1 (small): larger effect on diffusion capacity

section 2 (medium): effect on diffusion capacity and air

permeability

section 3 (large): larger effect on permeability

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

Acknowledgements

17

University of Innsbruck – Institute of Pharmacy

Pharmaceutical technologies

A.Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Ulrich Griesser

Mag. pharm. Dr. rer. nat. Michael F. Noisternig

THANK YOU!

2014

_ST

94 G

lein

ser.

pdf

Con

gres

s201

4 -

Doc

umen

t not

pee

r-re

view

ed b

y C

OR

ES

TA

top related