the public sphere as a field of struggle
Post on 03-Jan-2016
35 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
The Public Sphere as a Field of Struggle
Dieter RuchtInstitute for Protest and Social Movement Studies
Open seminar
‘The Democratic Public Sphere’
Aarhus, 8 March 2013
The public/public sphere
…is a field/system) of communication that everybody may access as an interested observer and in which, at least in principle, everybody can take part.
My focus is on public communication with regard to „res publica“, i.e. matters that, in the wide sense of the word, have a political dimension.
1. Some conceptual thoughts & tools2. Looking far back: Creating (a democratic) public
space 3. Struggles from the 60s to the 80s4. More recent struggles5. Outcomes & perspectives
Main thesis
The (modern) public sphere is, first, the result of social and political struggles and, second, constantly shaped and restructured by such struggles.
Therefore, it is not a given but a historically contingent social and legal construction.
1. Some conceptual thoughts & tools
Three types of publics:
- Informal encounters (few to few; no division of roles)
- Organized assemblies(few to many; division of roles)
- Mass media (few to – potentially- everybody, division of roles)
(Gerhards/Neidhardt 1990)
Figure 3: Model of Political Interest Mediation
Enviroment 1:Private sphere
Enviroment 2:Non-public
political sphere
Public domain
Systems oforganised interests
Citizens,Groups,Socialmilieus
Political-administrative
systemMass media
Parties
Associations
Movements
Source: adopted from Rucht 1995: 108.
Dimensions of struggles
1. One can broadly distinguish between struggles that explicitly relate to the structure and the rules of the public sphere on the one hand, and, on the other hand, struggles that take place in the public sphere but do not, or only indirectly, affect the structures and rules of this sphere.
2. Struggles focus onWho can/should take part? A former terrorist?
What can/should be covered? Private life of politicians?
What is a legitimate interest, claim, Minority rights? Denial of
argument? Holocaust?
How can/should it be expressed? Legitimacy of civil disobedience?
3. These struggles are essentially about drawing boundaries.
„The Quadruple A“
Reactions/strategies of social movement groups to exclusion and distortion
- Abstention
- Attac
- Adaptation
- Alternatives
(Rucht 2004)
2. Looking back: Creating a „democratic“ public space
Dominant struggles;
• Abolishing censorship• Creating physical and social spaces for free speech,
assemblies, organizations…• Publicness of political and juridical procedures• Establishing and protecting independent mass media
„Policing of protest“ in the past
3. Struggles from the 60s to the 80s
Dominant: Attack and alternatives
Physical attacks in the late 60s (Springer press, Berlin etc., La Stampa, Torino)
Establishing ‚autonomous‘ and ‚alternative‘ media addressing movement milieus (e.g., Informationsdienst zur Verbreitung unterbliebener Nachrichten, Lies of our Times, Free Radios…)
Entering the mass market (Klassenkampen,
Libération, tageszeitung, Kontext-TV, Kontext-paper)
3. Recent struggles
Dominant: adaptation, alternatives, andmulti-functional new media
Establishing sophisticated autonomous media (e.g., Adbusters, MoveOn, Campact, avaaz)Watching other media (Media Watch, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, BILDBlog, Action Critique Médias…) Creating new public spaces (e.g, social forums)Establishing internal ‚autonomous spaces‘ (ESFs)Public or private? Train stations, airports, squares, political councelling, LobbyControl…)Fighting surveillance in private and public spheres Controlling the internet and surveilling online communication (e.g. ACTA)
Adaptation: Designing Protest for Mass Media
Alternatives & Adaptation:Press center of „ausgestrahlt“, Hamburg 24.42010
5. Outcomes and Perspectives
• Inflation of claims and calls for action (mainly due to lower transaction costs via internet)
• Rapid mobilization and unpredictability of net-based campaigns
• Public recognition of the role of protest in and for democracy
• Professionalization of protesters‘ PR• Sophisticated counter-strategies (press officers
by the police, embedded journalists, fake citizen groups, rent-a-demonstrator…)
Offering „nice“ pictures
Protest in formal institutions
Recognition: Person of the year 2011
Thanks for
your attention!
Confiscated water pistol telegraph, 22.6.2007
Demonstrationsgeschehen in Berlin laut Behörden, 1985-2011
Zahl Proteste
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
Zahl Proteste
Proteste und Protestteilnehmer in Deutschland, 1950-2002(Rohdaten, incl. DDR/NBL ab 1989)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
An
zah
l d
er
Pro
tes
tere
ign
iss
e
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
Te
iln
eh
me
rza
hl
Protestereignisse Teilnehmerzahlen
top related