thesis - 4214
Post on 11-Jan-2017
137 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
05/01/2023 1
Welcome to Thesis Presentation
Presented ByAparna Barman
Roll.: 4214; Session: 2013-14Registration No.: Ha-2156Department of Fisheries
University of Dhaka
05/01/2023 2
Vulnerability of Fisheries to Climate Change in Bangladesh: A Composite
Index Approach
05/01/2023 3
Introduction Objectives Methodology Results and discussion Conclusions
Outline
05/01/2023 4
Rational Global climate is changing
(IPCC 2014) The fisheries sector is
considered amongst the worst affected by climate change (FAO 2012)
Bangladesh has been identified as extremely vulnerable country to climate change impacts (IPCC 2007; Met Office 2011; World Bank 2013)
Figure 1: Vulnerability of Fisheries to climate change at Global scale (Source: Allison et al. 2009).
Fisheries sector of Bangladesh has been identified as the most vulnerable to climate change in the World (Allison et al. 2009)
Introduction
05/01/2023 5
What is climate change? Any Change in climate over time, whether due to natural variability
or as a result of human activity (IPCC 2007)
Vulnerability? The degree to which a system is susceptible to or unable to cope
with adverse effects of climate change (IPCC 2001)
The attribute of vulnerability is the combined effect of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity, where - Exposure: the nature and degree to which a system is exposed to
significant climate variations Sensitivity: the degree to which a system is affected either adversely or
beneficially Adaptive Capacity: the ability of a system to adjust to climate change
Introduction
05/01/2023 6
Climate change impacts on fisheries
Climate Variables
• Temperature variation• Rainfall variation• Sea level rise• Land erosion• Flood• Cyclone• Storm surge etc.
Source: Daw et al. 2009
Introduction
Impacts on fisheries
• Change in yield• Change in species distribution• Increased variability of catches• Change in seasonality of
production• Damaged infrastructure• Damaged gears• Increased danger at sea• Flooding of fishing
communities etc.
05/01/2023 7
Research gap Bangladesh fisheries
about 3.69% of national GDP (22.60% agricultural GDP)Provide 60% of animal protein intake (FRSS 2015) Supports almost 17.5 million people directly and indirectly
So fisheries is an important sector and vulnerability of fisheries to climate change need to be studied
Community level vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in some parts of Bangladesh has been studied (Brouwer et al. 2007; Ullah and Rahman 2014; Islam et al. 2014; Ahmed and Diana 2015)
But district level vulnerability of 64 district of Bangladesh was not studied
Introduction
05/01/2023 8
To determine the vulnerability of culture fisheries, capture fisheries and overall fisheries to the impact of
climate variability and change
Objectives
Composite vulnerability index approach Computes vulnerability indices by aggregating data for a set
of indicators Steps –
Methodology > Composite index > Selecting indicators > Indicators > Data collection > Calculating sub-indices > Calculating vulnerability > Standardizing indices
9
Selecting indicators
Standardizing indicators
Calculating sub-indices
Calculating vulnerability
Methodology
Selecting indicators The degree of direct relevance to fisheries Availability district level data
Methodology > Composite index > Selecting indicators > Indicators > Data collection > Calculating sub-indices > Calculating vulnerability > Standardizing indices
10
Methodology
Methodology > Composite index > Selecting indicators > Indicators > Data collection > Calculating sub-indices > Calculating vulnerability > Standardizing indices 11
Exposure
• Variation in past maximum temperature
• Variation in past minimum temperature
• Future temperature • Variation in past rainfall• Future precipitation• Past sea level change• Storm surge• Past land erosion• Cyclone
Sensitivity
• Fish production (Culture/capture/ov-erall fisheries)
• Total water area (Culture/capture/ov-erall fisheries)
Adaptive Capacity
• Less poverty• GDP• Literacy rate• Electricity coverage• Housing structure• Monthly expenditure• Road• Primary school• Secondary school• Tube well
Indicators (Capture/culture/overall fisheries)
Methodology
Data collection
Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD) Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) Met Office 2011 Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Service
(CEGIS) Fisheries Resource Survey System (FRSS) World Bank 2014 Yu et al. 2011 Khondker and Mehzab 2015
Methodology > Composite index > Selecting indicators > Indicators > Data collection > Calculating sub-indices > Calculating vulnerability > Standardizing indices
12
Methodology
Calculating sub-indices
Methodology > Composite index > Selecting indicators > Indicators > Data collection > Calculating sub-indices > Calculating vulnerability > Standardizing indices
13
Methodology
Indicators Calculations
Temperature• Standard deviation of 30 days of a month• Mean value of standard deviation of the months of
all years (varies from 1975-2014)
Rainfall• Standard deviation of 30 days of a month.• Mean value of standard deviation of the months of
all years (varies from 1975-2014)
Production • Standard deviation of production from the year 2003-2015
For rest of the indicators single value were collected and usedValues of the indicators were composited to create the values of
exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity
Calculating vulnerability:The values of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity were
combined to create vulnerability
Methodology > Composite index > Selecting indicators > Indicators > Data collection > Calculating sub-indices > Calculating vulnerability > Standardizing indices
14
Methodology
Where, V = VulnerabilityE = Exposure S = SensitivityAC = Adaptive Capacity
The final vulnerability values depends equally on all three components (i.e. exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity)
V = [ ( E + S ) – AC ]
Standardizing Indices Resulting values of exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity and vulnerability
were standardized Rescaled in a range 0 to 1
Methodology > Composite index > Selecting indicators > Indicators > Data collection > Calculating sub-indices > Calculating vulnerability > Standardizing indices
15
Quartiles Categories
First quartile Low
Second quartile Moderate
Third quartile High
Fourth quartile Very high
Methodology
GIS software (ArcMap 10.3) used to map vulnerability in district level
Indexsi = Where
Indexsi = Normalized value Si = Actual valueSmax = The maximum value Smin = The minimum value
Categorized based on quartiles
16
Districts Exposure Districts Exposure Districts ExposureDhaka 0.59 Kushtia 0.64 Naogaon 0.64Faridpur 0.55 Magura 0.61 Natore 0.64Gazipur 0.59 Meherpur 0.62 Pabna 0.64Gopalganj 0.5 Narail 0.61 Rajshahi 0.64Jamalpur 0.55 Satkhira 0.6 Sirajganj 0.59Kishoreganj 0.6 Barguna 0.51 Bandarban 0Madaripur 0.5 Barisal 0.54 Brahmanbaria 0.49Manikganj 0.59 Bhola 0.71 Chandpur 0.72Munshiganj 0.59 Jhalokati 0.48 Chittagong 0.59Mymensingh 0.6 Patuakhali 0.63 Comilla 0.49Narayanganj 0.59 Pirojpur 0.38 Cox's Bazar 0.43Narsingdi 0.59 Dinajpur 0.98 Feni 0.96Netrakona 0.6 Gaibandha 0.93 Khagrachhari 0.66Rajbari 0.55 Kurigram 0.98 Lakshmipur 0.88Shariatpur 0.78 Lalmonirhat 0.98 Noakhali 0.97Sherpur 0.6 Nilphamari 1 Rangamati 0.33Tangail 0.58 Panchagarh 1 Habiganj 0.7Bagerhat 0.41 Rangpur 0.98 Maulvibazar 0.7Chuadanga 0.62 Thakurgaon 0.98 Sunamganj 0.74Jessore 0.61 Bogra 0.55 Sylhet 0.74
Jhenaidah 0.61 Chapai Nawabganj 0.64Khulna 0.91 Joypurhat 0.55
Exposure value of culture fisheriesResults and Discussion
17
Districts Sensitivity Districts Sensitivity Districts SensitivityDhaka 0.47 Kushtia 0.45 Naogaon 0.46Faridpur 0.5 Magura 0.45 Natore 0.46Gazipur 0.46 Meherpur 0.44 Pabna 0.49Gopalganj 0.47 Narail 0.44 Rajshahi 0.47Jamalpur 0.48 Satkhira 1 Sirajganj 0.44Kishoreganj 0.46 Barguna 0.46 Bandarban 0.45Madaripur 0.51 Barisal 0.67 Brahmanbaria 0.47Manikganj 0.47 Bhola 0.51 Chandpur 0.47Munshiganj 0.49 Jhalokati 0.46 Chittagong 0.56Mymensingh 0 Patuakhali 0.54 Comilla 0.59Narayanganj 0.48 Pirojpur 0.61 Cox's Bazar 0.82Narsingdi 0.57 Dinajpur 0.59 Feni 0.45Netrakona 0.47 Gaibandha 0.44 Khagrachhari 0.46Rajbari 0.46 Kurigram 0.45 Lakshmipur 0.46Shariatpur 0.47 Lalmonirhat 0.47 Noakhali 0.45Sherpur 0.45 Nilphamari 0.45 Rangamati 0.44Tangail 0.45 Panchagarh 0.47 Habiganj 0.41Bagerhat 0.6 Rangpur 0.46 Maulvibazar 0.42Chuadanga 0.45 Thakurgaon 0.47 Sunamganj 0.47Jessore 0.45 Bogra 0.47 Sylhet 0.41
Jhenaidah 0.45 Chapai Nawabganj 0.49Khulna 0.6 Joypurhat 0.45
Sensitivity values of culture fisheriesResults and Discussion
18
Districts Adaptive capacity Districts Adaptive capacity Districts Adaptive capacityDhaka 1 Kushtia 0.34 Naogaon 0.33Faridpur 0.24 Magura 0.18 Natore 0.21Gazipur 0.59 Meherpur 0.19 Pabna 0.38Gopalganj 0.27 Narail 0.16 Rajshahi 0.45Jamalpur 0.31 Satkhira 0.32 Sirajganj 0.19
Kishoreganj 0.27 Barguna 0.2 Bandarban 0Madaripur 0.13 Barisal 0.58 Brahmanbaria 0.29
Manikganj 0.13 Bhola 0.18 Chandpur 0.39
Munshiganj 0.32 Jhalokati 0.28 Chittagong 1Mymensingh 0.51 Patuakhali 0.26 Comilla 0.81
Narayanganj 0.53 Pirojpur 0.28 Cox's Bazar 0.17Narsingdi 0.33 Dinajpur 0.35 Feni 0.42
Netrakona 0.13 Gaibandha 0.26 Khagrachhari 0.09
Rajbari 0.12 Kurigram 0.17 Lakshmipur 0.23
Shariatpur 0.13 Lalmonirhat 0.02 Noakhali 0.43
Sherpur 0.12 Nilphamari 0.08 Rangamati 0.13
Tangail 0.4 Panchagarh 0.04 Habiganj 0.13
Bagerhat 0.36 Rangpur 0.33 Maulvibazar 0.23
Chuadanga 0.18 Thakurgaon 0.12 Sunamganj 0.06Jessore 0.55 Bogra 0.35 Sylhet 0.49
Jhenaidah 0.36 Chapai Nawabganj 0.14Khulna 0.65 Joypurhat 0.22
Adaptive capacity values of culture, capture and overall fisheriesResults and Discussion
05/01/2023 19
Vulnerability of Culture Fisheries
Results and Discussion
Very high High Moderate Low05
101520253035
12
31
74
Culture fisheries vulnerability
North Bengal districts are very highly vulnerable because of very high exposure and low adaptive capacity
Shahid and Behrawan (2008) found northern and northwestern districts highly exposed to drought
20
Districts Exposure Districts Exposure Districts ExposureDhaka 0.36 Kushtia 0.59 Naogaon 0.39Faridpur 0.54 Magura 0.37 Natore 0.39Gazipur 0.36 Meherpur 0.37 Pabna 0.59Gopalganj 0.31 Narail 0.37 Rajshahi 0.59Jamalpur 0.54 Satkhira 0.57 Sirajganj 0.57
Kishoreganj 0.37 Barguna 0.51 Bandarban 0
Madaripur 0.31 Barisal 0.74 Brahmanbaria 0.3
Manikganj 0.36 Bhola 0.84 Chandpur 0.84
Munshiganj 0.56 Jhalokati 0.5 Chittagong 0.57
Mymensingh 0.37 Patuakhali 0.79 Comilla 0.3
Narayanganj 0.36 Pirojpur 0.43 Cox's Bazar 0.46Narsingdi 0.36 Dinajpur 0.6 Feni 0.79
Netrakona 0.37 Gaibandha 0.77 Khagrachhari 0.4
Rajbari 0.54 Kurigram 0.8 Lakshmipur 0.94
Shariatpur 0.88 Lalmonirhat 0.6 Noakhali 1
Sherpur 0.37 Nilphamari 0.61 Rangamati 0.2
Tangail 0.56 Panchagarh 0.61 Habiganj 0.42
Bagerhat 0.45 Rangpur 0.6 Maulvibazar 0.42
Chuadanga 0.37 Thakurgaon 0.6 Sunamganj 0.45Jessore 0.37 Bogra 0.54 Sylhet 0.45
Jhenaidah 0.37 Chapai Nawabganj 0.59Khulna 0.76 Joypurhat 0.34
Exposure values of capture fisheries Results and Discussion
21
Districts Sensitivity Districts Sensitivity Districts SensitivityDhaka 0.19 Kushtia 0.59 Naogaon 0.23Faridpur 0.7 Magura 0.54 Natore 0.46Gazipur 0.22 Meherpur 0.51 Pabna 0.58Gopalganj 0.5 Narail 0.51 Rajshahi 0.36Jamalpur 0.68 Satkhira 1 Sirajganj 0.58
Kishoreganj 0.53 Barguna 0.45 Bandarban 0.39
Madaripur 0.51 Barisal 0.58 Brahmanbaria 0.42
Manikganj 0.6 Bhola 0.83 Chandpur 0.29
Munshiganj 0.44 Jhalokati 0.48 Chittagong 0
Mymensingh 0.65 Patuakhali 0.92 Comilla 0.16
Narayanganj 0.24 Pirojpur 0.54 Cox's Bazar 0.4Narsingdi 0.46 Dinajpur 0.41 Feni 0.24
Netrakona 0.37 Gaibandha 0.61 Khagrachhari 0.38
Rajbari 0.54 Kurigram 0.78 Lakshmipur 0.12
Shariatpur 0.58 Lalmonirhat 0.58 Noakhali 0.36
Sherpur 0.42 Nilphamari 0.62 Rangamati 0.5
Tangail 0.75 Panchagarh 0.39 Habiganj 0.29
Bagerhat 0.85 Rangpur 0.64 Maulvibazar 0.32
Chuadanga 0.58 Thakurgaon 0.28 Sunamganj 0.09Jessore 0.56 Bogra 0.34 Sylhet 0.63Jhenaidah 0.67 Chapai Nawabganj 0.57Khulna 0.92 Joypurhat 0.32
Sensitivity values of capture fisheries Results and Discussion
05/01/2023 22
Vulnerability of Capture Fisheries
Results and Discussion
Very high High Moderate Low05
1015202530354045
10
39
114
Capture fisheries vulnerability
Bhola district has the highest vulnerability.
Dhaka district has the lowest vulnerability.
Hasan et al. (2011) also found Bhola district vulnerable to climate change and affected by different disasters
23
Districts Sensitivity Districts Sensitivity Districts SensitivityDhaka 0.43 Kushtia 0.46 Naogaon 0.44Faridpur 0.48 Magura 0.49 Natore 0.47Gazipur 0.45 Meherpur 0.49 Pabna 0.45Gopalganj 0.46 Narail 0.48 Rajshahi 0.44Jamalpur 0.48 Satkhira 0.39 Sirajganj 0.45
Kishoreganj 0.49 Barguna 0.47 Bandarban 0.48
Madaripur 0.48 Barisal 0.46 Brahmanbaria 0.47
Manikganj 0.48 Bhola 0.44 Chandpur 0.42
Munshiganj 0.46 Jhalokati 0.48 Chittagong 0.42
Mymensingh 0 Patuakhali 0.46 Comilla 0.32
Narayanganj 0.44 Pirojpur 0.47 Cox's Bazar 0.46Narsingdi 0.47 Dinajpur 0.48 Feni 0.44
Netrakona 0.48 Gaibandha 0.46 Khagrachhari 0.49
Rajbari 0.48 Kurigram 0.49 Lakshmipur 0.44
Shariatpur 0.48 Lalmonirhat 0.48 Noakhali 0.38
Sherpur 0.47 Nilphamari 0.49 Rangamati 1Tangail 0.46 Panchagarh 0.48 Habiganj 0.46
Bagerhat 0.38 Rangpur 0.48 Maulvibazar 0.51
Chuadanga 0.49 Thakurgaon 0.49 Sunamganj 0.64Jessore 0.31 Bogra 0.42 Sylhet 0.51Jhenaidah 0.5 Chapai Nawabganj 0.49Khulna 0.46 Joypurhat 0.46
Sensitivity values of overall fisheries Results and Discussion
05/01/2023 24
Vulnerability of Fisheries
North Bengal and coastal districts are very highly vulnerable
Results and Discussion
Shariatpur district has the highest vulnerability
Dhaka district has the lowest vulnerability
Very high High Moderate Low05
10152025303540
16
34
95
Overall fisheries vulnerability
Islam et al. (2014) found fishing communities of Barguna district higher livelihood vulnerability
25
Vulnerability of different districts vary according to their exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity.
Because of different level of exposure – the highest sensitivity does not always lead to the highest
vulnerabilitythe highest adaptive capacity does not always results lowest
vulnerability Vulnerability of a certain district is highly context-dependent A large number of factors influence vulnerability of a district
Conclusions > Implications > Future Research
Conclusions
26
Implications Allow the policymakers to easily identify the most vulnerable
districts. Take necessary steps to decrease vulnerability and increase
adaptive capacity. Can easily understand where to spend the funding for climate
change in the context of fisheries sector. Finally the very highly vulnerable districts can learn from the low
vulnerable districts to reduce vulnerability.
Conclusions > Implications > Future Research
Conclusions
27
Future Research The reasons of very high or low vulnerability at field level. Fish habitat level vulnerability to climate change. Species level vulnerability to climate change. Vulnerability of Bay of Bengal fisheries.
Conclusions > Implications > Future Research
Conclusions
05/01/2023 28
Thank you
top related