traducere verdes nota
Post on 04-Apr-2018
227 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 1/17
America’s financial system
Law and disorder
Financial institutions are vulnerable toinvestigation, prosecution and litigation from
every directionOct 13th 2012 | NEW YORK | from the print edition
A STAFFER at a federal agency says he is often asked how many entities investigate and
prosecute financial firms in America. The only short answer he can give is: “a lot”. Here’s a
longer one.
Some entities are obvious: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and the Department of Justice (DoJ). Others are
less well known: the Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network are both part of the Treasury, for example. The Federal Reserve has gained newpowers and responsibilities under the Dodd-Frank act; it is also obliged to pour money into
the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Federal Housing Finance
Agency has filed lawsuits against banks for allegedly selling risky home loans to Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac without proper disclosure.
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 2/17
Other departments with nominally different patches participate in prosecutions, too. TheDepartment of Housing and Urban Development, for example, had a hand in a $25 billion
mortgage settlement struck with big banks earlier this year. The Federal Trade Commissionis explicitly blocked from regulating banking, but it too has been involved with litigationconcerning the servicing of loans. Pensions are regulated by the Department of Labour.
Many of these entities have sub-departments that act independently of each other. One
bank in the recent past found itself under investigation by three separate offices of the SEC
(there are a dozen). The DoJ often works through its 93 regional offices. Historically,
financial wrongdoing was prosecuted out of the Southern District of New York, which this
week sued (San Francisco-based) Wells Fargo for allegedly “reckless” lending practices,
among other things. But other attorneys have elbowed into this patch, as has headquarters,
which has created a unit for financial crimes in Washington, DC. Any of these units can start
its own inquiries, as can Congress itself —witness its recent probe of HSBC’s involvement in
processing illicit Iranian and Mexican payments.
Beyond all these are parallel departments in state governments, each of which has an
attorney-general (cynically referred to as “Almost Governors”). Their statewide jurisdictionoverlaps with district attorneys, who are elected locally and are in no short supply—62 in
New York state, 58 in California, and on and on—as well as with various departments in
each state devoted to the regulation of banking, securities and insurance. Standard
Chartered’s recent $340m settlement over allegations of evading Iranian sanctions, for
example, was with the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS).
And behind them, of course, are private armies of lawyers, ready to march wherever there
is money. During fiscal year 2011 the SEC collected $414m in fines from large financial
institutions in America, according to NERA, an economic consultancy; settlements in class-
action lawsuits reached $1.5 billion during the 2011 calendar year.
The upshot is a deluge of paperwork. If banks once did banking, now they practise law.
Wells Fargo has lower legal costs than many of its rivals (see chart) but still receives around
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 3/17
300 state, federal and grand-jury subpoenas a week on average. Some are against the bank
itself, though many are legal orders pertaining to the suspected crimes of others. The bank
gets so many legal orders—5,000 a week in total—that it has two centres that work full-
time on processing them, one on the west coast, one on the east. A specific group works on
prioritising the bank’s response to subpoenas; a weekly call involving 25-30 of the more
senior people in the compliance division is designed to iron out problems that arise from all
these requests.
Given what went on during the crisis, it is no surprise that there is lots of litigation. But
financial institutions can be hit from multiple directions at once. Investigations into
allegations of LIBOR rate-fixing, for instance, already involve the CFTC, the DoJ, state
attorney-generals from Connecticut, New York, Massachusetts, Florida, North Carolina and
Maryland, and at least 30 serious civil litigants. A reported investigation by Eric
Schneiderman, New York state’s attorney-general, into tax strategies on the part of private-
equity funds could easily also fall into the purview of the Internal Revenue Service and the
SEC.
A cast list this varied requires co-ordination. There is a history of different government
entities working together to prosecute crimes. Some of this co-operation is practical; it also
reflects the legal principle of “comity”, a type of reciprocity that results in one legal
jurisdiction voluntarily deferring to another. Since the SEC is limited to civil charges, it often
refers cases to the DoJ. Investigations into terrorist finance, sanction evasion and money-
laundering have traditionally been in the remit of the Manhattan district attorney.
But as the Standard Chartered case showed, when the DFS brought its charges unilaterally
and secured a rapid settlement with the bank, co-ordination between agencies is not
guaranteed. Indeed, the DFS’s success in collecting $340m may sharpen the incentives to “prosecute by press release”, if only because the rewards for being the first to file can be so
great.
A settlement with one regulator, moreover, does not mean settlement with them all. In
theory, American law discourages double jeopardy—being prosecuted twice for the same
crime. But in practice this does not apply to civil cases, or to cases prosecuted in different
systems (ie, federal or state)—a distinction often misunderstood, says David Aufhauser, an
attorney with Williams and Connolly and a former Treasury official. Standard Chartered is
still being investigated by state and federal agencies over its Iranian payments. Many banks
involved in the mortgage settlement in February with an array of federal departments and
state attorney-generals are still enmeshed in litigation; California’s new “Homeowner Bill of
Rights” has created the opportunity for more.
Unsettled
When Eliot Spitzer was New York’s attorney-general, he justified this prosecutorial
marketplace by arguing that it lit a fire underneath dozy regulators. But it is hard to argue
that the current set-up serves justice. Since an indictment against a financial institution can
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 4/17
lead to a suspension of its licence, and open the door to private litigation, firms often
choose to settle when an investigation is launched. According to NERA, in the course of
fiscal year 2011 and the first half of fiscal year 2012, the SEC reached 13 settlements of
$5m or more with big financial firms. All were announced on the same day the SEC filed its
complaint.
A settlement often suits the authorities as well as the banks. Fines are frequently used to
fund government budgets; and many a political career has been launched on the back of a
high-profile deal, without the need to prove allegations in court.
This cosy alignment of incentives worries some. If an institution has committed an offence,
a settlement mitigates the risks of harsher penalties. If it has not done anything wrong,
shareholders are paying up to get prosecutors off their backs. Oklahoma’s attorney -general,
Scott Pruitt, was the only one of his colleagues not to participate in the national mortgage
settlement earlier this year. Mr Pruitt said it had nothing to do with genuine fairness or
justice, rewarded bad behaviour and reflected an illicit expansion of regulatory power.
The courts themselves have also voiced concern—particularly about how cases are settled
through back-room negotiations. “An application of judicial power that does not rest on facts
is worse than mindless, it is inherently dangerous,” wrote Judge Jed Rakof f, in response to a
settlement by Citigroup with the SEC.
To cope with the deluge of litigation, banks are falling over themselves to hire ex-
regulators, feeding the idea that the law is too chaotic to be understood by anyone outside
the system. Financial firms should of course be held to account when they do wrong. But
there must be a better way
Exports and the economy
Made in BritainExports are growing, but too slowly to rescuethe economyJan 21st 2012 | from the print edition
JUST over a mile from Liverpool John Lennon Airport, named for one of Britain's most
successful exports, sits the Halewood operations of Jaguar Land Rover. Its foreign saleswould make a Beatle envious. Over the December holidays the Tata-owned car factory ran
extra shifts to keep up with demand. An expansion to the facility, which could create 1,500
jobs, is reportedly under consideration. JLR is already building a new engine plant in
Wolverhampton. Other car firms are enjoying similar success. In 2010 Nissan invested over
£400m in its state-of-the-art Sunderland factory, which produces for export to more than
90 countries.
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 5/17
As Britain's economy stumbles toward a likely recession, hopes are pinned on exports,
particularly to faster-growing parts of the world. George Osborne, the chancellor, flew to
China this week and marvelled at that country's hunger for goods and services. Since 2007
the pound has dropped nearly a quarter on a trade-weighted basis. A devaluation in the
early 1990s helped Britain export its way out of recession. Can it repeat the trick now?
There are some encouraging signs. Britain's trade deficit shrank from 4% of GDP in 2007 to
around 1% of GDP by early 2011. But the economy might have been expected to do better
after such a big depreciation. The obstacles have been many. Falling global demand blunted
the impact of a cheap pound in 2008 and 2009. Once global trade recovered, so did Britain's
appetite for imports—despite a rise in relative import prices of roughly 20% since 2007. A
decade of strong sterling has chipped away at the capacity of manufacturing industry—and
factories cannot be rebuilt quickly. The financial-services industry, which accounted for a
third of British exports in 2008, has been slow to recover.
A deeper concern is that Britain has become too dependent on moribund rich-world
markets. The share of exports going to Europe has fallen in the past decade, but the
continent still accounts for half of British exports (see chart). That market is shrinking; the
Economist Intelligence Unit, our sister company, forecasts that the euro-zone economy will
contract by 1.2% in 2012. One Conservative MP, Douglas Carswell, has complained that it is
like being “shackled to a corpse”. America absorbs more British exports than any other
single country and its economy still looks relatively robust. British exports to that country
fell 4% in the year to September, but showed signs of recovery, along with America's
economy, in October and November.
The emerging economies of Asia and Latin America seem a better long-term bet than
Britain's established markets. But the combined share of British exports going to the three
emerging-market giants—China, India and Brazil—is less than 5%. Britain can boast neither
the large natural-resource endowments nor the focus on production of capital goods, like
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 6/17
machine tools, that appeal to rapidly industrialising economies. And firms have been
lamentably slow to build trade links with these fast-growing economies. That may be a
legacy of Britain's past imbalances: when the domestic economy was strong, there was little
incentive for its firms to go to the trouble of finding customers in unfamiliar markets.
The recent success of Britain's car industry suggests all is not lost. Domestic car sales fell by4.2% in the year to November, but exports to China rose 23%, and sales to India were up
by 67%. Foreign carmakers who built export-oriented operations in Britain in previous
decades have taken advantage of the fall in sterling to expand market share, particularly in
emerging markets. Luxury outfits like JLR, Rolls-Royce and Bentley hawk Britishness to the
new rich. The car industry may, then, offer a blueprint for a rebalancing with “exports at its
heart”, in David Cameron's phrase. For that to occur, however, producers in other industries
long battered by dear sterling must find a way to learn from and duplicate the success now
on display in Liverpool. Let it be
http://www.economist.com/node/21559358
Oilfield services
The unsung masters of the oil
industryOil firms you have never heard of are boomingJul 21st 2012 | ABERDEEN | from the print edition
A TECHNIQUE called “directional drilling” has transformed the energy business. Fifteen
years ago the best drillers could force a well-shaft into a gentle arc. These days shafts can
be drilled vertically to a depth of several kilometres—then made to turn sharply and
continue horizontally for up to 12km (or 7 miles). Will Grace of Schlumberger, an oilfield
services company, likens it to dropping a plumb-line from the top of the Empire State
Building and then guiding it through the rear and front windscreens of every car parked in
the nearby streets.
Such technology vastly increases the area one rig can cover (see diagram). For an
illustration, Mr Grace points to squiggles and shadings on a computer screen in one of the
34 offices Schlumberger operates in Aberdeen, a Scottish oil city. The lines show the
progress of a well completed for a Canadian oil firm a few hours earlier. It is 13,000 feet
(4,000 metres) deep and has been brought to a halt 6,500 feet horizontally away from the
rig, within three feet of its target.
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 7/17
Instruments in the “drill-string”—as formerly inflexible steel drill-shafts are now called—are
meanwhile transmitting dozens of additional measurements: of the radioactivity of the
surrounding rock, its resistivity to electromagnetic waves, and so on. In this case, the rock
gives a low radioactivity reading, which suggests that it is sand; its resistivity is high, which
suggests it is oil-bearing. This is wizardry that few firms can match. And probably none is a
regular oil company.
Oilfield services (OFS) firms such as Schlumberger are the unsung workhorses of the oil
industry. They do most of the heavy lifting involved in finding and extracting oil and gas.
They are far less well-known than the oil firms that hire them, but immensely lucrative.
Schlumberger, with headquarters in Paris and Houston, earned profits of $5 billion on
revenues of $40 billion last year. Its market capitalisation has risen fourfold in the past
decade, to $91 billion. That is bigger than several international oil companies, including ENI
($82 billion), Statoil ($75 billion) and Conoco-Philips ($71 billion).
Schlumberger’s success highlights a shift in the balance of power between oil companies
and their flunkeys. Until the 1990s OFS companies were far smaller and earned low margins
on straightforward tasks, such as drilling vertical wells. That has changed dramatically.
With the price of oil so high, firms are scrambling to pump it out of ever more remote and
costly crevices. Over the past decade the oil industry’s annual spending on exploration and
production has increased fourfold in nominal terms, while oil production is up by only 12%.
The big services companies, which invest heavily in technology (see chart), have been
growing by around 10% a year. According to McKinsey, a consultancy, OFS companies
grossed around $750 billion last year.
OFS firms come in three flavours. Some make and sell expensive kit for use on drilling rigs
or the seabed. These include FMC, Cameron and National Oilwell Varco, all $10-billion-plus
companies. Some own and lease out drill-rigs. These companies include Transocean,
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 8/17
Seadrill, Noble and Rowan. The third group carries out most of the tasks involved in finding
and extracting oil. It is dominated by four giants: Schlumberger, Halliburton, Baker Hughes,
and Weatherford International.
Most of these firms were relatively small until the 1980s, when several oil companies
decided that humdrum drilling chores were no longer worth doing in-house. Oil was easythen. Drilling yielded low margins that did not justify its claim on capital, so the oil majors
outsourced it. This gave OFS firms space to grow.
They grew even faster in the early 1990s, when a tightening oil market drove demand for
new technology. This led to breakthroughs in 3D seismology and directional drilling. These
breakthroughs allow oil to be sucked economically from far beneath the ocean floor, and out
of depleted and formerly abandoned wells.
But such inventions do not come cheap. Schlumberger invests roughly $1 billion a year in
research and development, a level it maintained even during the slump after the 2008
financial crisis. That is as much as the mighty ExxonMobil spends; as a share of sales, fivetimes more. The big OFS companies now probably file more patent applications than the oil
majors, whose technological skills are largely interpretive. (For example, an oil major may
decide where and how to drill based on geophysical data provided by an OFS firm.)
The oil business is likely to grow even more dependent on brainy OFS firms. Global
production from mature oilfields is falling by between 2% and 6% a year. In the North Sea
it has declined by 6% a year on average since 1999. With global demand for oil growing by
1-2% a year, there are persistent fears of a supply shock. Hence the current high oil prices:
even after a 20% fall in recent months, Brent Crude is now around $100 a barrel. Oil firms
are searching harder in more remote places, such as the Arctic and the deep seas off Brazil.
Operating in such places will require yet more snazzy technology.
With hindsight, the oil companies’ decision to outsource the grubby bits of the job looks like
an opportunity squandered. It has also left the oil firms hostage to the availability of
increasingly expensive and sought-after services, from advanced drilling to deepwater rigs,
which a dwindling number of OFS firms can provide.
There is, at present, still a fair amount of competition in most parts of the services industry.
Each big OFS firm has different strengths, and plenty of smaller ones occupy specialised
niches. Yet in some areas, especially the geographically remote ones, the demand for
complex services often outstrips the supply.
Even worse for the likes of Exxon and BP, this has come at a time when state-owned oil
firms have been muscling onto the stage. In the past couple of decades these national oil
companies have claimed the best acreage in most old oilfields. The OFS firms have helped
them to do so. Where once the state-owned giants hired oil majors to do the work, now
they can manage projects themselves and hire technical help directly from the services
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 9/17
firms. This can sometimes involve a limited sharing of risk between national and OFS firms,
just as in a regular joint venture between oil companies.
Schlumberger, for example, will agree to a measure of payment-for-performance in big
contracts. If it can drill more oil from a well than the contract says it must, it charges a
higher fee. Other services firms have gone further, taking small equity stakes in explorationprojects.
Some analysts wonder how all this might hurt the oil majors. A few decades ago national oil
companies had to turn to oil majors for the technology required to get the stuff out of the
ground. Today, oilfield service companies offer all the necessary technology and are
increasingly willing to take on some of the same risks as an oil company, notes Marcel
Brinkman of McKinsey.
Still, it would be wildly premature to bid Exxon adieu. Schlumberger’s performance-based
contracts are a long way short of owning reserves—something the company says it will
never do. It lacks the mammoth balance-sheet that oil firms maintain to manage the hugerisks in oil exploration. It also lacks Exxon’s expertise in managing huge projects. And it is
reluctant to annoy its customers by competing with them. Moreover, choosing where and
how to explore (another strength of the oil majors) is trickier than you might think.
Instead, Schlumberger is planning more of what it is best at: pushing the technological
boundaries of extracting the black stuff. It has recently been busy making acquisitions—
including of Smith International, an American drill-bit company, for $11.3 billion—which
have given it know-how in most segments of exploration and production. It now hopes to
re-engineer the entire process.
The prize of increased efficiencies—delivered in barrels of money, not oil—could be vast. A
big deepwater drilling rig costs half a million dollars a day to rent, and can take three
months to drill a complicated well. Any OFS company that can shave a few days off that
time will be in the money. Drilling is thrilling, and getting more so.
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 10/17
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 11/17
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 12/17
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 13/17
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 14/17
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 15/17
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 16/17
directional drilling oil well sonda de petrol foraj cu circulatie directa
drillers foraj
well-shaft
gentle arc arc subtire
oilfield service company companie de servicii petroliere
plumb line perspective perpendicular; linie vertical; fir cu plumb
rear
7/30/2019 Traducere Verdes Nota
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/traducere-verdes-nota 17/17
front widescreen
rig
squiggles mazgalitura
shadings
halt oprire, a pune capat
dril-string cablu d eforaj
steel drill-shaft
oil bearing
wizardy
unsung
market capitalization
fourfold
drifting vertical wells
crevice
drill rig instalatie de foraj
humdrum drilling oarecare obisnuit
depleted
top related