transit improvement & pedestrian realm project · upper haight farmers’ market public realm...
Post on 03-Aug-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
July 6, 2016
T R A N S I T I M P R O V E M E N T & P E D E S T R I A N R E A L M P R O J E C TS T R E E T S C A P E C O M M U N I T Y M E E T I N GS T R E E T S C A P E C O M U N IM U N I T Y M IE E T I N G
Meeting Etiquette Streetscape Community Meeting
• Please sign in
• Please turn off cell phones
• Direct comments to the facilitator
• Raise your hand to speak
• Please limit your comment to one (1) minute and be respectful of all comments
• Please hold all questions for the end
AgendaStreetscape Community Meeting
Welcome and Introductions - (15 Min.)
Streetscape Conceptual Plan - (30 Min.)
Feedback/ Discussion - (15 Min.)
Break Out Session - (20 Min.)
Stakeholders: HAMA, HAIA, HANC, CVIA
1
2
3
4
Process to Date
First Public Meeting Cole Valley Fair Upper Haight Farmers’ MarketPublic Realm Plan- Public Workshop Public Realm Plan- Open HouseHaight St. Merchant’s Working Group #1SFMTA Board Approves Rapid ProjectHaight St. Merchant’s Working Group #2Public Realm Plan- Open HousePublic Realm Plan- Final Report CompletedFocus Group Meeting w/ Stakeholder Groups #1Focus Group Meeting w/ Stakeholder Groups #2
10.24.1209.29.1310.23.1302.27.1406.11.1410.14.1410.20.1410.28.1402.25.1502.01.1502.19.1603.22.1607.06.16 Streetscape Community Meeting
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.165
Alternate Proposal“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.166
Alternate Proposal“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.167
Alternate Proposal“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.168
HistoryConnected to the PastMoving Towards the Future
The Haight Street of today is markedly different than the Haight Street of past generations but many aspects of the public realm remain relatively unchanged. The narrow sidewalks encountered along Haight Street were built long before the street became the crowded destination that it is today. Furthermore, navigating the residential side streets to arrive at the commercial corridor can be difficult for outside visitors. This neighborhood, perhaps more than any other in our city, will always be associated with elements of the past -- and it is for this reason that the future design of Haight Street must enable the greatest possible degree of flexibility by creating urban spaces that are able to evolve with the changing demands of the neighborhood.
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.169
BackgroundGlobal ReachRegional AppealLocal Character
The Upper Haight Streetscape Improvement Project encompasses half a mile long urban space which spans one of the most socially diverse and iconic neighborhoods in the United States. Haight Street is a local treasure layered with a history of connection, activism, entertainment, tolerance, community, and counter-culture. The place tells its own story through its distinct neighborhood character, thriving commercial corridor, and the global appeal that brings international visitors to Haight Street every day. Moving forward, we seek to enrich an already compelling story and bring this urban space up to date through new lighting, embedded way-finding, neighborhood greening, and expanded pedestrian spaces. These few simple features allow the narrative of Haight Street to remain connected to the past while also providing the necessary opportunities to shape new stories well into the future.
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1610
G L O B A L R E A C H
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1611
Global ReachThe historical elements and iconic symbolism are features which foster Haight Street’s role as an international destination for visitors.
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1612
R E G I O N A L A P P E A L
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1613
Regional AppealThe thriving commercial corridor which runs through Upper Haight Street is an essential element in the neighborhood’s resilience. Unique retail shops, curiosities, and iconic local establishments will help bring Haight Street into the future.
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1614
L O C A L C H A R A C T E R
HA
IG
HT
ST
G O L D E N G A T E P A R K
M A S O N I C A V E
C E N T R A L A V E
A S H B U R Y S T
C L A Y T O N S T
B E L V E D E R E S T
C O L E S T
S H R A D E R S T
S T A N Y A N S T
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1615
Local CharacterThe new design should build upon the unique local character already present in the Upper Haight Street neighborhood in order to create a thriving streetscape that all can enjoy.
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1616
BEYOND THE SUMMER OF LOVE
Global Reach Regional Appeal Local Character Contemporary Haight Street
The future Haight Street presents an opportunity to draw upon theinternational, regional, and local elements to carry Haight St. into the futurewhile maintaining significant connections to our historical past.
+ + =
C O N C E P T
GoalsHaight Streetscape Improvements
1. Support the unique identity of the Haight Street neighborhood.
2. Further develop the recommendations provided through the Haight Ashbury Public Realm Plan.
3. Create a safe and well-lit corridor through pedestrian lighting.
4. Review existing urban forest along Haight St. and identify areas of opportunity for future greening.
5. Incorporate MTA transit bulbs into the larger streetscape design.
6. Celebrate the history of the Haight Ashbury intersection in a contemporary fashion.
7. Provide opportunities for the introduction of neighborhood art.
SHSHSRARARAR
DE
DE
DR RR
TSTTT
COCOCOCOLELELE
SSTTTT((((E
AEAESTSTT
)))
CLCCCAYAYAY
TOTOOONNN
STSTS
mat
chlin
e
mat
chlin
e
CLCLCCAYAYAYY
TOTOTNNNN
STSTTST
ASASASH
BBH
BRURURY Y Y
STSTTTT
MA
MA
MAAS
OSOSOON
IN
ICAVAVV
EE
CECECECN
TN
TN
TRARAR
L L LLAVAVAVV
E
STSTSTANANAN
YAYAYNNNN
STSTSTST
HAIGHT ST
COCOCOCLELELELE
SSSST T
(W(W(W(WESESESES
T)
BEBBBLVVLV
EDEDEDDERERRR
E EEE STST
50’
BeBenBenBee && JeJJeJerJe ry’ssIce Creeeame
McDMcDMcDDDonaonaonaonald’ld’d’d’d sss
ChaChaChaChaChaChaCha
HAIGHT ST
PloPPPloy IIThaThah i
CCuiC sins eee SpSpaS rroooowww
StrStreeteett TacTacTacTacTacoooo
HobHoHobH sonson’s’sssss sssssssChoChChChChoicece
MarMMMa tintintinnMaMaMack’ss
PorPorPorPorrrkkkkStoStoStoStorerereeCafCafCafCafCafeeee
PePePeopleple’s ’s CafCafC ee
BlueFront ntnDeli
HaiHaiHaiH ghtghtghtghg PatPatPattioioioCafCafCafCafafeee
MagMagggnolnolnolnoliaiaGasGastrorororoooppubpubp
CofCoffeefeefefe ToTooo TheThee PePePeP oploploploplop eeee
SiaSiam Lm otuo sThaThaaaaiii
AleAleAlembimbimmm cZona aaRosRosRR aaa
CitCCCC rusususus CluCluCluCluC bbbb
WhoWholeleFooFoodsds
AmoAmAmoAmoebaebaebebaMusMusMusMussicic
GooGooGooodwdwill
WasWaWasW tele andannd
ThTheTheTh ReReReReddddVicVicViVictorttorianian
HaiHaightghtg StSttttreereer t t MarMarketket
BufBuffalfaloo ExcExcExcchanhanhanhangegegege
LLLovL ed ddd Too
DeaDDD thththhth
GOLDDDDENENENENENENENENNGAGAAG TETET PAARKKKKKK
DecDeDeDee adeesssssssssssssof o
FasFaasasa hionnnnnnnnnnnn
TheTheTBooBooo ksmksmmitht
ZamZZ Zam
RobRobRR erter s sHHararHa dwad rer
BurBurBu gererer UrgUUrgeee
CroCrooossroadddssssRVRVRVCRVRVR AAAAAA
PiePiePPPP dmodmodmomontntntntntBBouBououB tiqtiqtiqtiqii ueeueueue
JamJamminmm MMMM
OnOnOnnHaiHaightgghtght
ChihiChiChiC nesnesnesnesses Ie Ie Ie Immemmemmmemm rsirsirsiiononoSchSchchSchc oooloo at DeAvilaaaa
CenCenCenCentratratratralll HaiH iH iHa ghtghtghght Marketee
Braaaindndropr s
HaiHaiHHa ghtghtghththtAsAshAAsAss burururryyyyT-SST-ST- hirhihirhirh tstststts
AviAviatoatoatoatoorr rrNatNatatNationionionion
LEGENDNew Sidewalk Paving
New Transit & Pedestrian Bulbs
Decorative Intersection Treatment
Continental Crosswalk
New Street Lighting Fixture
New Pedestrian Lightingat Haight/ Ashbury
(E) Street Tree
Corridor Nodes
Transit Stops
(E) Parklet to Remain
Stanyan Transit Node
Haight/ Ashbury Node
T-Intersections Node
P L A N D I A G R A MP L A N D I A G R A M
Note: Colors and patterns shown in plan
are for diagramatic purposes only.
(E)(E)(E)) PaPaPaP rklrkleet etettoto RemRemRemee ainainn
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1618
ASASASASH
BH
BH
BBH
BURURURURY YYY
STSTST
AM
AM
AAM
ASOSOSOOSO
NI
NI
NI
NI
NNCCCCC
AVAVAVAVVAVEEEE
HAHAHAHAHAIGGGI HHHTH ST
Potential Future String Lighting (by Community)New Pedestrian Lighting
New Street Lighting Fixtures
New Decorative Pedestrian Bulb Treatment at Haight/Ashbury IntersectionContinental Crosswalks
New Curb Ramps
New Sidewalk Paving Throughout
Typical Section
20’
LEGENDNew Sidewalk Paving
New Transit & Pedestrian Bulbs
Decorative Intersection Treatment
Continental Crosswalk
New Street Lighting Fixture
New Pedestrian Lightingat Haight/ Ashbury
(E) Street Tree
Potential Future String Lighting (by Community)
T Y P I C A L B L O C K
Note: Colors and patterns shown in plan
are for diagramatic purposes only.
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1619
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1620
E X I S T I N G
P R O P O S E D
44’-9” ROADWAY
31’-9” ROADWAY
12’-0” WALK
18’-0” WALK
12’-0” WALK
19’-0” WALK
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
Expanded Bulbout Walkway
Selective Tree Replacement
New Pedestrian Lighting
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1621
Typical Sidewalk Section
SIDEWALKPATH OF TRAVELZONE
LIGHT + FIBERCONDUIT
TREE + PED LIGHT ZONE
SIDEWALK ZONE:8’-0”
OVERALL WIDTH:12’-0”
TREE + PED LIGHT ZONE:4’-0”
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
WORKSHOP #3
June 11, 2014
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING
SIGNAGE
IDENTITY
GREENING
SEATING (INFORMAL)
Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards.
Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.
There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.
Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
TIE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
MODERN
CROSSWALKS
STREET TREES
POINTS OF INTEREST
PLANTER EDGES
TRADITIONAL
SIDEWALK PLAQUES
PLANTERS
TRANSIT
LEANING POSTS
STOREFRONT
ARTISTIC ELEMENTS
STORMWATER
PARKING
BOLLARDS
DECORATIVE
BANNERS
TREE GUARDS
GREENING
IDENTITY
SIGNAGE
LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN
WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE
PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.
Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.
Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT
‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE
‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
PUBLIC ART
‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
LIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES
INTERSECTIONS
GREEN
AMENITY
ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED
LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)
Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)
Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)
Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)
Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)
Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART
INTERSECTION MARKER
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
FLEXIBLE SPACE
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1622
Public Realm PlanHaight Streetscape Improvements
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN
WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE
PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along HaightStreet. The most popular locations for this spacewas the block between Clayton and Ashbury,followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.
Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor,the highest priority for mid-block spaces wasadditional greening and sidewalk gardens.
Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalkextensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a moretraditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT
‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE
‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
PUBLICART
‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
INTERSECTIONTREATMENT
INTERSECTIONTREATMENT
LIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES
INTERSECTIONS
LES AND CHAIRSMOVEABLE TABL
TINGSPLANT
RSLANTETREES/PL
TERER PLANTSTORMWATE
ISPLAYART DI
NGPARKINBICYCLE
GREEN
AMENITY
ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED
LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)
Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)
Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)
Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)
Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)
Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWESTPRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART
INTERSECTIONMARKER
INTERSECTIONTREATMENT
FLEXIBLESPACE
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greeningwere both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1623
Lighting
SPACING:40’ to 50’on center
HEIGHT:17’-4”
COLOR:PowdercoatedBlack
P E D E S T R I A N L I G H T I N G
O P T I O N AHolophane “GranVille”
O P T I O N BHolophane “Syracuse”y
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1624
FLAG SIZE:3’-0” x 3’-0”
INTEGRAL COLOR:Dark Grey/ Charcoal
Paving
S I D E W A L K P A V I N G
O P T I O N A O P T I O N B
Concrete w/ dark grey integral color(without sparkle grain finish)
Concrete w/ dark grey integral color & sparkle grain finish
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1625
Tree AnalysisThoughtfully located street trees along Haight Street can greatly enhance the strong architectural character of the street. Establishing an urban forest at each cross street would establish community greening on the neighborhood scale while also creating a sense of arrival for visitors as they approach Haight Street.
Damaged Limbs
Dense Canopy
Leaning Trunk
Choked Roots
Leaning Trunk
Unhealthy Environment Dense Canopy
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1626
Tree Analysis - Site Walk
Please join us for a walk with our
Urban Forester!
Saturday, July 9th10am-Noon
Meet on Haight Street (near Stanyan St.) near the Whole
Foods parking lot.
*Please wear walking shoes as we’ll walk each side of Haight Street
between Stanyan St. and Central Ave.
MEET HERE
Whole Foods
Golden Gate Park
Stanyan S
t.
Haight St.
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
WORKSHOP #3
June 11, 2014
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING
SIGNAGE
IDENTITY
GREENING
SEATING (INFORMAL)
Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards.
Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.
There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.
Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
TIE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
MODERN
CROSSWALKS
STREET TREES
POINTS OF INTEREST
PLANTER EDGES
TRADITIONAL
SIDEWALK PLAQUES
PLANTERS
TRANSIT
LEANING POSTS
STOREFRONT
ARTISTIC ELEMENTS
STORMWATER
PARKING
BOLLARDS
DECORATIVE
BANNERS
TREE GUARDS
GREENING
IDENTITY
SIGNAGE
LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN
WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE
PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.
Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.
Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT
‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE
‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
PUBLIC ART
‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
LIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES
INTERSECTIONS
LES AND CHAIRSMOVEABLE TABL
TINGSPLANT
RSLANTETREES/PL
TERER PLANTSTORMWATE
ISPLAYART DI
NGPARKINBICYCLE
GREEN
AMENITY
ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED
LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)
Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)
Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)
Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)
Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)
Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART
INTERSECTION MARKER
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
FLEXIBLE SPACE
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND STANYAN
Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT
‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE
‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
PUBLICART
‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
INTERSECTIONTREATMENT
INTERSECTIONS
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWESTPRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART
INTERSECTION MARKER
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
FLEXIBLE SPACE
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
WORKSHOP #3
June 11, 2014
HIGHESTPRIORITY
LIGHTING
SIGNAGE
IDENTITY
GREENING
SEATING (INFORMAL)
Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view thesurvey and the accompanying presentation boards.
Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implementedalong Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.
There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongestsupport was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.
Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVOVOORITEORITE
OFAVOORORITE
OFAVOVOORITE
FAVOFAVOORITE
OFAVOORITE
TIE
LEAASTFAVOOORITE
LEAASTASTFAVORRITERITE
LEAASTAFAVOVORITERITE
LEA TASTFAVOAVORITE
LEASTASTFAVORITE
MODERN
CROSSWALKS
STREET TREES
POINTS OF INTEREST
PLANTER EDGES
TRADITIONAL
SIDEWALK PLAQUES
PLANTERS
TRANSIT
LEANING POSTS
STOREFRONT
ARTISTIC ELEMENTS
STORMWATER
PARKING
BOLLARDS
DECORATIVE
BANNERS
TREE GUARDS
GREENING
IDENTITY
SIGNAGE
LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1627
Public Realm PlanMid Block Improvements
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury,followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.
New Pedestrian LightingCentered on Paving Band
In Ground Planting Areaswithin Expanded Bulbs
Iconic Paving at Expanded Pedestrian Areas
Existing Street Trees
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1628
Belvedere St Cole (W) St
Cole (E) St
C O N C E P T A T T - B U L B SE N L A R G E M E N T A R E A
N
0 30 60
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1629
80’-0” to 115’-0”
12’-0” 6’-0”
Features:
Opportunity for Quotes in Concrete Paving • Light Grey Integral Color Concrete• 18” Thick Band Spaced 3’-0” O.C.• Black Pedestrian Lighting Aligned with Paving• In-ground Planting Areas in Bulb-outs w/ Custom Planter Railings
E N L A R G E M E N T A R E AC O N C E P T A T T - B U L B S
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
WORKSHOP #3
June 11, 2014
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING
SIGNAGE
IDENTITY
GREENING
SEATING (INFORMAL)
Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards.
Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.
There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.
Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
FAVORITE
TIE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
LEASTFAVORITE
MODERN
CROSSWALKS
STREET TREES
POINTS OF INTEREST
PLANTER EDGES
TRADITIONAL
SIDEWALK PLAQUES
PLANTERS
TRANSIT
LEANING POSTS
STOREFRONT
ARTISTIC ELEMENTS
STORMWATER
PARKING
BOLLARDS
DECORATIVE
BANNERS
TREE GUARDS
GREENING
IDENTITY
SIGNAGE
LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN
WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE
PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.
Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.
Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT
‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE
‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
PUBLIC ART
‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
LIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES
INTERSECTIONS
GREEN
AMENITY
ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED
LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)
Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)
Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)
Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)
Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)
Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART
INTERSECTION MARKER
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
FLEXIBLE SPACE
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE
PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire foradditional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.
Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.
LIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES
LES AND CHAIRSMOVEABLE TABL
TINGSPLANT
RSLANTETREES/PL
TERER PLANTSTORMWATE
ISPLAYART DI
NGPARKINBICYCLE
GREEN
AMENITY
ACTIVITY
MOSTPREFERRED
LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)
Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)
Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)
Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)
Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)
Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
WORKSHOP #3
June 11, 2014
HIGHESTPRIORITY
LIGHTING
SIGNAGE
IDENTITY
GREENING
SEATING (INFORMAL)
Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at apublic meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time torespond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view thesurvey and the accompanying presentation boards.
Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implementedalong Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, thestrongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorativelighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followedby sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.
There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongestsupport was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bikeracks or special paving details.
Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was supportfor signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVOVOORITEORITE
OFAVOORORITE
OFAVOVOORITE
FAVOFAVOORITE
OFAVOORITE
TIE
LEAASTFAVOOORITE
LEAASTASTFAVORRITERITE
LEAASTAFAVOVORITERITE
LEA TASTFAVOAVORITE
LEASTASTFAVORITE
MODERN
CROSSWALKS
STREET TREES
POINTS OF INTEREST
PLANTER EDGES
TRADITIONAL
SIDEWALK PLAQUES
PLANTERS
TRANSIT
LEANING POSTS
STOREFRONT
ARTISTIC ELEMENTS
STORMWATER
PARKING
BOLLARDS
DECORATIVE
BANNERS
TREE GUARDS
GREENING
IDENTITY
SIGNAGE
LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1630
Public Realm PlanHaight and Ashbury Improvements
Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
S O C I A L A C T I V I T YH A I G H T / A S H B U R Y
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1631
Then
No
w
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1632
Design InspirationHaight Ashbury Intersection
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1633
Ashbbuuryyy SStty
Hai
gggggggh
t SS
t
To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF
Ben & Jerry’sIce Cream
Haight AshburyT-Shirts
AviatorNation RVCA
N
0 20 40
*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials.
Mosaic Tiles- Grey Tones
H A I G H T / A S H B U R YO P T I O N A
onesVictorian Column Gatewayhs
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1634
Ashburyyy Sty
Haii
gggggggh
t SS
t
To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF
Ben & Jerry’sIce Cream
Haight AshburyT-Shirts
AviatorNation RVCA
N
0 20 40
*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials.
Mosaic Tiles- Blue Jewel Tones
H A I G H T / A S H B U R YO P T I O N B
el ToneVictorian Column Gatewayhs
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1635
Ashburyyy Sty
Haii
gggggggggh
t SS
t
To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF
Ben & Jerry’sIce Cream
Haight AshburyT-Shirts
AviatorNation RVCA
N
0 20 40
*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials.
Mosaic Tiles- Purple Jewel Tones
H A I G H T / A S H B U R YO P T I O N C
Jewel ToVictorian Frame Gatewayhs
Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1636
www.sfmta.com/7rapid http://sf-planning.org/haight-ashbury-public-realm-plan
Amy Lam, Project Manager (Amy.Lam@sfdpw.org)
T H A N K Y O U !
top related