transit improvement & pedestrian realm project · upper haight farmers’ market public realm...

Post on 03-Aug-2020

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

July 6, 2016

T R A N S I T I M P R O V E M E N T & P E D E S T R I A N R E A L M P R O J E C TS T R E E T S C A P E C O M M U N I T Y M E E T I N GS T R E E T S C A P E C O M U N IM U N I T Y M IE E T I N G

Meeting Etiquette Streetscape Community Meeting

• Please sign in

• Please turn off cell phones

• Direct comments to the facilitator

• Raise your hand to speak

• Please limit your comment to one (1) minute and be respectful of all comments

• Please hold all questions for the end

AgendaStreetscape Community Meeting

Welcome and Introductions - (15 Min.)

Streetscape Conceptual Plan - (30 Min.)

Feedback/ Discussion - (15 Min.)

Break Out Session - (20 Min.)

Stakeholders: HAMA, HAIA, HANC, CVIA

1

2

3

4

Process to Date

First Public Meeting Cole Valley Fair Upper Haight Farmers’ MarketPublic Realm Plan- Public Workshop Public Realm Plan- Open HouseHaight St. Merchant’s Working Group #1SFMTA Board Approves Rapid ProjectHaight St. Merchant’s Working Group #2Public Realm Plan- Open HousePublic Realm Plan- Final Report CompletedFocus Group Meeting w/ Stakeholder Groups #1Focus Group Meeting w/ Stakeholder Groups #2

10.24.1209.29.1310.23.1302.27.1406.11.1410.14.1410.20.1410.28.1402.25.1502.01.1502.19.1603.22.1607.06.16 Streetscape Community Meeting

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.165

Alternate Proposal“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.166

Alternate Proposal“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.167

Alternate Proposal“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.168

HistoryConnected to the PastMoving Towards the Future

The Haight Street of today is markedly different than the Haight Street of past generations but many aspects of the public realm remain relatively unchanged. The narrow sidewalks encountered along Haight Street were built long before the street became the crowded destination that it is today. Furthermore, navigating the residential side streets to arrive at the commercial corridor can be difficult for outside visitors. This neighborhood, perhaps more than any other in our city, will always be associated with elements of the past -- and it is for this reason that the future design of Haight Street must enable the greatest possible degree of flexibility by creating urban spaces that are able to evolve with the changing demands of the neighborhood.

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.169

BackgroundGlobal ReachRegional AppealLocal Character

The Upper Haight Streetscape Improvement Project encompasses half a mile long urban space which spans one of the most socially diverse and iconic neighborhoods in the United States. Haight Street is a local treasure layered with a history of connection, activism, entertainment, tolerance, community, and counter-culture. The place tells its own story through its distinct neighborhood character, thriving commercial corridor, and the global appeal that brings international visitors to Haight Street every day. Moving forward, we seek to enrich an already compelling story and bring this urban space up to date through new lighting, embedded way-finding, neighborhood greening, and expanded pedestrian spaces. These few simple features allow the narrative of Haight Street to remain connected to the past while also providing the necessary opportunities to shape new stories well into the future.

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1610

G L O B A L R E A C H

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1611

Global ReachThe historical elements and iconic symbolism are features which foster Haight Street’s role as an international destination for visitors.

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1612

R E G I O N A L A P P E A L

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1613

Regional AppealThe thriving commercial corridor which runs through Upper Haight Street is an essential element in the neighborhood’s resilience. Unique retail shops, curiosities, and iconic local establishments will help bring Haight Street into the future.

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1614

L O C A L C H A R A C T E R

HA

IG

HT

ST

G O L D E N G A T E P A R K

M A S O N I C A V E

C E N T R A L A V E

A S H B U R Y S T

C L A Y T O N S T

B E L V E D E R E S T

C O L E S T

S H R A D E R S T

S T A N Y A N S T

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1615

Local CharacterThe new design should build upon the unique local character already present in the Upper Haight Street neighborhood in order to create a thriving streetscape that all can enjoy.

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1616

BEYOND THE SUMMER OF LOVE

Global Reach Regional Appeal Local Character Contemporary Haight Street

The future Haight Street presents an opportunity to draw upon theinternational, regional, and local elements to carry Haight St. into the futurewhile maintaining significant connections to our historical past.

+ + =

C O N C E P T

GoalsHaight Streetscape Improvements

1. Support the unique identity of the Haight Street neighborhood.

2. Further develop the recommendations provided through the Haight Ashbury Public Realm Plan.

3. Create a safe and well-lit corridor through pedestrian lighting.

4. Review existing urban forest along Haight St. and identify areas of opportunity for future greening.

5. Incorporate MTA transit bulbs into the larger streetscape design.

6. Celebrate the history of the Haight Ashbury intersection in a contemporary fashion.

7. Provide opportunities for the introduction of neighborhood art.

SHSHSRARARAR

DE

DE

DR RR

TSTTT

COCOCOCOLELELE

SSTTTT((((E

AEAESTSTT

)))

CLCCCAYAYAY

TOTOOONNN

STSTS

mat

chlin

e

mat

chlin

e

CLCLCCAYAYAYY

TOTOTNNNN

STSTTST

ASASASH

BBH

BRURURY Y Y

STSTTTT

MA

MA

MAAS

OSOSOON

IN

ICAVAVV

EE

CECECECN

TN

TN

TRARAR

L L LLAVAVAVV

E

STSTSTANANAN

YAYAYNNNN

STSTSTST

HAIGHT ST

COCOCOCLELELELE

SSSST T

(W(W(W(WESESESES

T)

BEBBBLVVLV

EDEDEDDERERRR

E EEE STST

50’

BeBenBenBee && JeJJeJerJe ry’ssIce Creeeame

McDMcDMcDDDonaonaonaonald’ld’d’d’d sss

ChaChaChaChaChaChaCha

HAIGHT ST

PloPPPloy IIThaThah i

CCuiC sins eee SpSpaS rroooowww

StrStreeteett TacTacTacTacTacoooo

HobHoHobH sonson’s’sssss sssssssChoChChChChoicece

MarMMMa tintintinnMaMaMack’ss

PorPorPorPorrrkkkkStoStoStoStorerereeCafCafCafCafCafeeee

PePePeopleple’s ’s CafCafC ee

BlueFront ntnDeli

HaiHaiHaiH ghtghtghtghg PatPatPattioioioCafCafCafCafafeee

MagMagggnolnolnolnoliaiaGasGastrorororoooppubpubp

CofCoffeefeefefe ToTooo TheThee PePePeP oploploploplop eeee

SiaSiam Lm otuo sThaThaaaaiii

AleAleAlembimbimmm cZona aaRosRosRR aaa

CitCCCC rusususus CluCluCluCluC bbbb

WhoWholeleFooFoodsds

AmoAmAmoAmoebaebaebebaMusMusMusMussicic

GooGooGooodwdwill

WasWaWasW tele andannd

ThTheTheTh ReReReReddddVicVicViVictorttorianian

HaiHaightghtg StSttttreereer t t MarMarketket

BufBuffalfaloo ExcExcExcchanhanhanhangegegege

LLLovL ed ddd Too

DeaDDD thththhth

GOLDDDDENENENENENENENENNGAGAAG TETET PAARKKKKKK

DecDeDeDee adeesssssssssssssof o

FasFaasasa hionnnnnnnnnnnn

TheTheTBooBooo ksmksmmitht

ZamZZ Zam

RobRobRR erter s sHHararHa dwad rer

BurBurBu gererer UrgUUrgeee

CroCrooossroadddssssRVRVRVCRVRVR AAAAAA

PiePiePPPP dmodmodmomontntntntntBBouBououB tiqtiqtiqtiqii ueeueueue

JamJamminmm MMMM

OnOnOnnHaiHaightgghtght

ChihiChiChiC nesnesnesnesses Ie Ie Ie Immemmemmmemm rsirsirsiiononoSchSchchSchc oooloo at DeAvilaaaa

CenCenCenCentratratratralll HaiH iH iHa ghtghtghght Marketee

Braaaindndropr s

HaiHaiHHa ghtghtghththtAsAshAAsAss burururryyyyT-SST-ST- hirhihirhirh tstststts

AviAviatoatoatoatoorr rrNatNatatNationionionion

LEGENDNew Sidewalk Paving

New Transit & Pedestrian Bulbs

Decorative Intersection Treatment

Continental Crosswalk

New Street Lighting Fixture

New Pedestrian Lightingat Haight/ Ashbury

(E) Street Tree

Corridor Nodes

Transit Stops

(E) Parklet to Remain

Stanyan Transit Node

Haight/ Ashbury Node

T-Intersections Node

P L A N D I A G R A MP L A N D I A G R A M

Note: Colors and patterns shown in plan

are for diagramatic purposes only.

(E)(E)(E)) PaPaPaP rklrkleet etettoto RemRemRemee ainainn

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1618

ASASASASH

BH

BH

BBH

BURURURURY YYY

STSTST

AM

AM

AAM

ASOSOSOOSO

NI

NI

NI

NI

NNCCCCC

AVAVAVAVVAVEEEE

HAHAHAHAHAIGGGI HHHTH ST

Potential Future String Lighting (by Community)New Pedestrian Lighting

New Street Lighting Fixtures

New Decorative Pedestrian Bulb Treatment at Haight/Ashbury IntersectionContinental Crosswalks

New Curb Ramps

New Sidewalk Paving Throughout

Typical Section

20’

LEGENDNew Sidewalk Paving

New Transit & Pedestrian Bulbs

Decorative Intersection Treatment

Continental Crosswalk

New Street Lighting Fixture

New Pedestrian Lightingat Haight/ Ashbury

(E) Street Tree

Potential Future String Lighting (by Community)

T Y P I C A L B L O C K

Note: Colors and patterns shown in plan

are for diagramatic purposes only.

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1619

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1620

E X I S T I N G

P R O P O S E D

44’-9” ROADWAY

31’-9” ROADWAY

12’-0” WALK

18’-0” WALK

12’-0” WALK

19’-0” WALK

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

Expanded Bulbout Walkway

Selective Tree Replacement

New Pedestrian Lighting

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1621

Typical Sidewalk Section

SIDEWALKPATH OF TRAVELZONE

LIGHT + FIBERCONDUIT

TREE + PED LIGHT ZONE

SIDEWALK ZONE:8’-0”

OVERALL WIDTH:12’-0”

TREE + PED LIGHT ZONE:4’-0”

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS

CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES

TREATMENT ELEMENTS

WORKSHOP #3

June 11, 2014

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LIGHTING

SIGNAGE

IDENTITY

GREENING

SEATING (INFORMAL)

Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards.

Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.

There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.

Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.

SEATING

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

TIE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

MODERN

CROSSWALKS

STREET TREES

POINTS OF INTEREST

PLANTER EDGES

TRADITIONAL

SIDEWALK PLAQUES

PLANTERS

TRANSIT

LEANING POSTS

STOREFRONT

ARTISTIC ELEMENTS

STORMWATER

PARKING

BOLLARDS

DECORATIVE

BANNERS

TREE GUARDS

GREENING

IDENTITY

SIGNAGE

LIGHTING

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS

HAIGHT AND STANYAN

WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE

PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456

Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.

Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.

Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.

GATEWAY ELEMENT

‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE

‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

PUBLIC ART

‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

LIKE DISLIKE

MID BLOCK SPACES

INTERSECTIONS

GREEN

AMENITY

ACTIVITY

MOST PREFERRED

LEAST PREFERRED

Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)

Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)

Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)

Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)

Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)

Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND ASHBURY

PUBLIC ART

INTERSECTION MARKER

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

FLEXIBLE SPACE

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1622

Public Realm PlanHaight Streetscape Improvements

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS

HAIGHT AND STANYAN

WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE

PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456

Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along HaightStreet. The most popular locations for this spacewas the block between Clayton and Ashbury,followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.

Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor,the highest priority for mid-block spaces wasadditional greening and sidewalk gardens.

Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalkextensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a moretraditional intersection marker.

GATEWAY ELEMENT

‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE

‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

PUBLICART

‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

INTERSECTIONTREATMENT

INTERSECTIONTREATMENT

LIKE DISLIKE

MID BLOCK SPACES

INTERSECTIONS

LES AND CHAIRSMOVEABLE TABL

TINGSPLANT

RSLANTETREES/PL

TERER PLANTSTORMWATE

ISPLAYART DI

NGPARKINBICYCLE

GREEN

AMENITY

ACTIVITY

MOST PREFERRED

LEAST PREFERRED

Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)

Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)

Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)

Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)

Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)

Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWESTPRIORITY

HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND ASHBURY

PUBLIC ART

INTERSECTIONMARKER

INTERSECTIONTREATMENT

FLEXIBLESPACE

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greeningwere both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1623

Lighting

SPACING:40’ to 50’on center

HEIGHT:17’-4”

COLOR:PowdercoatedBlack

P E D E S T R I A N L I G H T I N G

O P T I O N AHolophane “GranVille”

O P T I O N BHolophane “Syracuse”y

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1624

FLAG SIZE:3’-0” x 3’-0”

INTEGRAL COLOR:Dark Grey/ Charcoal

Paving

S I D E W A L K P A V I N G

O P T I O N A O P T I O N B

Concrete w/ dark grey integral color(without sparkle grain finish)

Concrete w/ dark grey integral color & sparkle grain finish

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1625

Tree AnalysisThoughtfully located street trees along Haight Street can greatly enhance the strong architectural character of the street. Establishing an urban forest at each cross street would establish community greening on the neighborhood scale while also creating a sense of arrival for visitors as they approach Haight Street.

Damaged Limbs

Dense Canopy

Leaning Trunk

Choked Roots

Leaning Trunk

Unhealthy Environment Dense Canopy

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1626

Tree Analysis - Site Walk

Please join us for a walk with our

Urban Forester!

Saturday, July 9th10am-Noon

Meet on Haight Street (near Stanyan St.) near the Whole

Foods parking lot.

*Please wear walking shoes as we’ll walk each side of Haight Street

between Stanyan St. and Central Ave.

MEET HERE

Whole Foods

Golden Gate Park

Stanyan S

t.

Haight St.

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS

CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES

TREATMENT ELEMENTS

WORKSHOP #3

June 11, 2014

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LIGHTING

SIGNAGE

IDENTITY

GREENING

SEATING (INFORMAL)

Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards.

Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.

There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.

Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.

SEATING

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

TIE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

MODERN

CROSSWALKS

STREET TREES

POINTS OF INTEREST

PLANTER EDGES

TRADITIONAL

SIDEWALK PLAQUES

PLANTERS

TRANSIT

LEANING POSTS

STOREFRONT

ARTISTIC ELEMENTS

STORMWATER

PARKING

BOLLARDS

DECORATIVE

BANNERS

TREE GUARDS

GREENING

IDENTITY

SIGNAGE

LIGHTING

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS

HAIGHT AND STANYAN

WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE

PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456

Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.

Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.

Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.

GATEWAY ELEMENT

‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE

‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

PUBLIC ART

‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

LIKE DISLIKE

MID BLOCK SPACES

INTERSECTIONS

LES AND CHAIRSMOVEABLE TABL

TINGSPLANT

RSLANTETREES/PL

TERER PLANTSTORMWATE

ISPLAYART DI

NGPARKINBICYCLE

GREEN

AMENITY

ACTIVITY

MOST PREFERRED

LEAST PREFERRED

Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)

Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)

Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)

Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)

Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)

Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND ASHBURY

PUBLIC ART

INTERSECTION MARKER

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

FLEXIBLE SPACE

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND STANYAN

Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.

GATEWAY ELEMENT

‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE

‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

PUBLICART

‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

INTERSECTIONTREATMENT

INTERSECTIONS

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWESTPRIORITY

HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND ASHBURY

PUBLIC ART

INTERSECTION MARKER

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

FLEXIBLE SPACE

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS

CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES

TREATMENT ELEMENTS

WORKSHOP #3

June 11, 2014

HIGHESTPRIORITY

LIGHTING

SIGNAGE

IDENTITY

GREENING

SEATING (INFORMAL)

Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view thesurvey and the accompanying presentation boards.

Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implementedalong Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.

There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongestsupport was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.

Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.

SEATING

FAVOVOORITEORITE

OFAVOORORITE

OFAVOVOORITE

FAVOFAVOORITE

OFAVOORITE

TIE

LEAASTFAVOOORITE

LEAASTASTFAVORRITERITE

LEAASTAFAVOVORITERITE

LEA TASTFAVOAVORITE

LEASTASTFAVORITE

MODERN

CROSSWALKS

STREET TREES

POINTS OF INTEREST

PLANTER EDGES

TRADITIONAL

SIDEWALK PLAQUES

PLANTERS

TRANSIT

LEANING POSTS

STOREFRONT

ARTISTIC ELEMENTS

STORMWATER

PARKING

BOLLARDS

DECORATIVE

BANNERS

TREE GUARDS

GREENING

IDENTITY

SIGNAGE

LIGHTING

LOWEST PRIORITY

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1627

Public Realm PlanMid Block Improvements

Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury,followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.

New Pedestrian LightingCentered on Paving Band

In Ground Planting Areaswithin Expanded Bulbs

Iconic Paving at Expanded Pedestrian Areas

Existing Street Trees

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1628

Belvedere St Cole (W) St

Cole (E) St

C O N C E P T A T T - B U L B SE N L A R G E M E N T A R E A

N

0 30 60

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1629

80’-0” to 115’-0”

12’-0” 6’-0”

Features:

Opportunity for Quotes in Concrete Paving • Light Grey Integral Color Concrete• 18” Thick Band Spaced 3’-0” O.C.• Black Pedestrian Lighting Aligned with Paving• In-ground Planting Areas in Bulb-outs w/ Custom Planter Railings

E N L A R G E M E N T A R E AC O N C E P T A T T - B U L B S

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS

CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES

TREATMENT ELEMENTS

WORKSHOP #3

June 11, 2014

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LIGHTING

SIGNAGE

IDENTITY

GREENING

SEATING (INFORMAL)

Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards.

Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative lighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followed by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.

There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details.

Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.

SEATING

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

FAVORITE

TIE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

LEASTFAVORITE

MODERN

CROSSWALKS

STREET TREES

POINTS OF INTEREST

PLANTER EDGES

TRADITIONAL

SIDEWALK PLAQUES

PLANTERS

TRANSIT

LEANING POSTS

STOREFRONT

ARTISTIC ELEMENTS

STORMWATER

PARKING

BOLLARDS

DECORATIVE

BANNERS

TREE GUARDS

GREENING

IDENTITY

SIGNAGE

LIGHTING

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS

HAIGHT AND STANYAN

WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE

PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456

Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.

Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.

Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk extensions. Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.

GATEWAY ELEMENT

‘GREEN’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE

‘ACTIVE’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

PUBLIC ART

‘AMENITY’ SIDE-WALK EXTENSION

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

LIKE DISLIKE

MID BLOCK SPACES

INTERSECTIONS

GREEN

AMENITY

ACTIVITY

MOST PREFERRED

LEAST PREFERRED

Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)

Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)

Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)

Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)

Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)

Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND COLEHIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT AND ASHBURY

PUBLIC ART

INTERSECTION MARKER

INTERSECTION TREATMENT

FLEXIBLE SPACE

HIGHEST PRIORITY

LOWEST PRIORITY

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS

WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE

PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE123456

Past outreach indicated that there was a desire foradditional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight Street. The most popular locations for this space was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.

Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.

LIKE DISLIKE

MID BLOCK SPACES

LES AND CHAIRSMOVEABLE TABL

TINGSPLANT

RSLANTETREES/PL

TERER PLANTSTORMWATE

ISPLAYART DI

NGPARKINBICYCLE

GREEN

AMENITY

ACTIVITY

MOSTPREFERRED

LEAST PREFERRED

Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side)

Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side)

Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side)

Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side)

Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side)

Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)

HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTSCORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS

CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES

TREATMENT ELEMENTS

WORKSHOP #3

June 11, 2014

HIGHESTPRIORITY

LIGHTING

SIGNAGE

IDENTITY

GREENING

SEATING (INFORMAL)

Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at apublic meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time torespond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view thesurvey and the accompanying presentation boards.

Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implementedalong Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, thestrongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorativelighting. Street trees were the most popular greening category, followedby sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.

There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongestsupport was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bikeracks or special paving details.

Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was supportfor signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.

SEATING

FAVOVOORITEORITE

OFAVOORORITE

OFAVOVOORITE

FAVOFAVOORITE

OFAVOORITE

TIE

LEAASTFAVOOORITE

LEAASTASTFAVORRITERITE

LEAASTAFAVOVORITERITE

LEA TASTFAVOAVORITE

LEASTASTFAVORITE

MODERN

CROSSWALKS

STREET TREES

POINTS OF INTEREST

PLANTER EDGES

TRADITIONAL

SIDEWALK PLAQUES

PLANTERS

TRANSIT

LEANING POSTS

STOREFRONT

ARTISTIC ELEMENTS

STORMWATER

PARKING

BOLLARDS

DECORATIVE

BANNERS

TREE GUARDS

GREENING

IDENTITY

SIGNAGE

LIGHTING

LOWEST PRIORITY

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1630

Public Realm PlanHaight and Ashbury Improvements

Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.

S O C I A L A C T I V I T YH A I G H T / A S H B U R Y

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1631

Then

No

w

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1632

Design InspirationHaight Ashbury Intersection

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1633

Ashbbuuryyy SStty

Hai

gggggggh

t SS

t

To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF

Ben & Jerry’sIce Cream

Haight AshburyT-Shirts

AviatorNation RVCA

N

0 20 40

*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials.

Mosaic Tiles- Grey Tones

H A I G H T / A S H B U R YO P T I O N A

onesVictorian Column Gatewayhs

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1634

Ashburyyy Sty

Haii

gggggggh

t SS

t

To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF

Ben & Jerry’sIce Cream

Haight AshburyT-Shirts

AviatorNation RVCA

N

0 20 40

*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials.

Mosaic Tiles- Blue Jewel Tones

H A I G H T / A S H B U R YO P T I O N B

el ToneVictorian Column Gatewayhs

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1635

Ashburyyy Sty

Haii

gggggggggh

t SS

t

To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF

Ben & Jerry’sIce Cream

Haight AshburyT-Shirts

AviatorNation RVCA

N

0 20 40

*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials.

Mosaic Tiles- Purple Jewel Tones

H A I G H T / A S H B U R YO P T I O N C

Jewel ToVictorian Frame Gatewayhs

Upper Haight Transit Improvement & Pedestrian Realm Project

Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.1636

www.sfmta.com/7rapid http://sf-planning.org/haight-ashbury-public-realm-plan

Amy Lam, Project Manager (Amy.Lam@sfdpw.org)

T H A N K Y O U !

top related