treatment and disposal of sugarbeet processing waste … · 2010-11-20 · treatment and disposal...
Post on 18-Mar-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
TREATMENT ANDDISPOSAL OFSUGARBEETPROCESSINGWASTE WATERBY IRRIGATION
UNITED STATESDEPARTMENT OFAGRICULTURE
CONSERVATIONRESEARCH REPORTNUMBER 25
PREPARED BYSCIENCE ANDEDUCATIONADMINISTRATION
-14 S-2-) 1In
CRR 25080
---
II\
/
ABSTRACT
Irrigation with sugarbeet processing wastewater was studied at three locations for 2 or 3years where perennial grass and alfalfa wereirrigated by flooding specially graded fields.Experimental sites were scheduled forirrigation at intervals of 1, 2, or 4 weeks. Thisschedule was maintained for the first year untilthe weekly irrigated plots were discontinuedbecause of excessive loading. Waste water wassampled twice weekly from the sugar factories,and water samples were extracted from the soilat depths of from 15 to 150 cm each time thefields were irrigated. All water samples wereanalyzed for chemical oxygen demand, totalnitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, electricalconductivity, calcium, magnesium, sodium,sodium absorption ratio, pH, chlorine, sulfate,and bicarbonate. Soil and plants were alsoanalyzed for selected constituents. Napplications to the experimental plots rangedfrom 280 to 4200 kg/ha and, on the fields, from277 to 1425 kg/ha. P applications ranged from 5to 50 kg/ha on the experimental plots and from11 to 43 kg/ha on the fields. K applicationsranged from 195 to 6350 kg/ha on theexperimental plots and from 490 to 3410 kg/ha
on the fields. Water applications ranged from 28to 201 cm/year, and COD applications rangedfrom 8 to 140 metric tons/ha. COD reduction inthe waste water at Twin Falls averaged 48percent in winter and 98 percent in summer; atRupert, it averaged 84 percent in winter and 98percent in summer; and at Nampa, it averaged75 percent in winter and 88 percent in summer.Nitrates found in water samples extracted from150 cm in the soil were mostly below 10 parts permillion N with a few samples higher. Irrigationwith sugarbeet processing waste water workswell in the field.
KEYWORDS: Chemical oxygen demand,nitrate, phosphorus, potas-sium, calcium, magnesium,sodium, sodium absorptionratio, electrical conductivity,pH, pollution control, wastewater irrigation.
CONTENTSPage
Glossary Introduction Methods and materialsResults and discussion
Waste effluent analysis and application Chemical oxygen demand in waste water
extracted from the treatment field Nitrogen in waste water and in extracted waste water
samples Phosphorus and potassium in waste water and
extracted soil waterElectrical conductivity, calcium, magnesium,
sodium absorption ratios, and pHChlorides, sulfates, and bicarbonatesComposition of harvested hay Soil analysis 9
Summary 9Literature cited 10Appendix 12
iv1
2 2
2and in water
5
5
6sodium, 7
in water samples 88
Issued September 1980
GLOSSARY
Anerobiosis ... Without air or without oxygen.Anions ... Negatively charged ions.Cation exchange capacity ... The sum total of
exchangeable cations (positively charged ions)that a soil can absorb.
Clay-size fraction ... A soil separate consistingof particles less than 0.002 mm diameter.
Dentrification ... The biochemical reduction ofnitrate or nitrite to gaseous nitrogen either asmolecular nitrogen or as an oxide of nitrogen.
Electrical conductivity . . . The measurementof a solution's capacity to conduct electricity.In soils and water, the electrical conductivity isa measurement of the total concentration ofsoluble salts.
Flood irrigation ... Irrigating soils by means ofsurface application of water in furrows orbasins.
Graded fields . . . Fields that have beenmechanically smoothed to a particular grade orslope.
Land disposal ... Disposing of waste materialson land.
Leaching . . . The removal of materials insolution from the soil.
Loading . . . The amount of organic matter,water, and nutrients applied to land in wastewater. See Nutrient loading.
Nutrient loading . . . The amount of plantnutrients applied to soil in wastes, either solidor liquid.
Oxygen demand . . . The oxygen required tochemically or biologically oxidize a particularmaterial.
Particle size analysis ... Determination of thevarious amounts of the different separates in asoil sample.
Primary treatment . . . The first treatment ofwaste water, which usually consists of settlingor screening out particulate material.
Processing plant waste effluent . . . Wastewater discharged from a food processing plant.
Saline . . . A nonsodic (nonsodium) soilcontaining sufficient soluble salts to impair itsproductivity.
Secondary treatment ... Additional treatmentof primary treated waste water to removedissolved organic constituents, usually bybiological oxidation.
Steffen's waste . . . The filtrate obtained fromthe precipitation of calcium sucrate in theSteffen process of recovering sugar fromsugarbeet molasses.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) . . . Thenitrogen content of a material that is analyzedby a Kjeldahl method.
iv
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OFSUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE
WATER BY IRRIGATIONBy J.H. Smith and C.W. Hayden l
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, irrigating agricultural landwith waste water has increased until it is now amajor method of waste water management.This method of waste water utilization hasreplaced much of the discharge to streams andconventional treatment in primary andsecondary waste treatment systems for foodprocessing waste water (4,5, 10, 13,14,15, 17,20,32).2 Most food processing waste water can beused for irrigating agricultural land because itseldom contains toxic constituents. Cropsgrown on the land remove part of the plantnutrients supplied by the waste water and canbe fed to livestock(1, 2).
Considerable data have been published onwaste water irrigation in recent years, andseveral food processing waste waters have beenevaluated for irrigation use. Smith andassociates published nutrient contents of potatoprocessing waste water (23, 25), water loading,organic loading, reduction of chemical oxygendemand (COD) and nitrates in soil (22, 27),denitrification in potato processing wastetreatment fields (24, 26), and decomposition insoils of cooking oils used in potato processing(21).
De Haan and associates (6, 7) reportedresearch results from The Netherlands on land
1 Soil scientist and biological technician (soils), SnakeRiver Conservation Research Center, Kimberly, Idaho83341.
2 Italic numbers in parentheses refer to Literature Cited,p. 10.
disposal of potato starch waste water. Theyconcluded that the system works well, thatoxygen demand and the chemical constituentsexcept potassium were satisfactorily removed atmoderate applications as waste water passedthrough the soil, and that using waste water forirrigation could economically benefit thefarmers.
Nutrient concentrations in waste water and,in some cases, feasibility for irrigation use havebeen evaluated for several food processingwaste waters: cannery wastes (9, 19), citruswastes (12), vegetable wastes (16, 28, 29, 30),fruit processing wastes (18,28, 29,32), and grainwastes (29). For the most part, these wastewaters can be used for irrigating agriculturalland with a minimum of problems.
Sugarbeet processors discharge largevolumes of waste water that contain relativelylow concentrations of organic matter,suspended solids, and various inorganicnutrients. Large amounts of nitrogen andorganic matter can be applied to the fieldsbecause they are irrigated with large volumes ofthese waste waters.
The objectives of this paper are to summarizedata for (1) flood irrigation with sugarbeetprocessing waste water; (2) loading withnutrients and organic matter; and (3) watercleanup through soil filtration andmicrobiological activity to evaluate someaspects of nutrient utilization to considersalinity and specific ions, and to discussfeasibility of continued irrigation withsugarbeet processing waste water.
2 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
METHODS AND MATERIALS
This study was conducted at threeAmalgamated Sugar Company plants locatedat Twin Falls, Rupert, and Nampa, Idaho,where the waste water is used to irrigate croppedfields. The waste water irrigation fields at thethree plants were all designed and prepared forwaste water irrigation by leveling to rigidspecifications and diking the fields to preventrunoff. A slight grade was designed into eachfield to facilitate surface irrigation. The fieldswere seeded to a mixture of orchard grass(Dactylis glomerata) and alfalfa (Medicagosativa), which was harvested for hay during thesummer. Waste water was sampled at eachsugarbeet processing plant twice weekly duringthe beet processing season. An automaticsampler delivered waste water into a freezer atdesignated intervals, where it was frozen in aplastic container for storage until it could beanalyzed in the laboratory (8). At the Nampasugarbeet processing plant, a water meter wasused to actuate the sampler at preset volumes ofwater, sampling the waste water in proportionto the volume passing through the meter.
Waste water irrigations were scheduled atintervals of 1, 2, and 4 weeks at the Twin Fallsand Rupert plants and at 2 and 4 weeks at theNampa plant. The weekly irrigations werecontinued until January 1977 when they werestopped because of severe overloading of theplots. Soil water was sampled after eachirrigation, using 3.8-cm-diameter, polyvinyl-chloride sampling tubes with porous ceramiccups cemented to one end. The sampling tubeswere inserted vertically into the soil to depths of15, 3q, 60, 90, 120, and 150 cm at each samplingsite. When taking samples, approximately 0.7-
bar suction was applied to the tubes for about 48hours. The extracted water was pumped into asuction flask, transferred to a plastic bottle, andtaken to the laboratory for refrigerated storageuntil it was analyzed. Not every tube yielded awater sample at every sampling.
The water samples were analyzed for CODaccording to "Standard Methods _ for theExamination of Water and Waste Water" (3).Nitrate-nitrogen was determined with a nitrate-specific ion electrode. Total nitrogen wasdetermined by a Kjeldahl procedure, modifiedby substituting copper for the mercury catalyst(2): Total phosphorus was determined bypersulfate oxidation (31) and potassium, byflame photometry. Water applications to thefields were measured by the field operatorsusing watermeters. Processing plant wasteeffluents, water samples extracted withextraction tubes, and saturated soil extractswere also analyzed for sodium by flamephotometry. Calcium and magnesium wereanalyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry;chloride, by silver titration; sulfate, byprecipitation as barium sulfate and read on aspectrophotometer; total dissolved salts, byelectrical conductivity; and pH was taken. Soilssampled annually were analyzed for the aboveconstituents by the methods listed above and fortotal organic matter by wet digestion. The firstsoil samples were analyzed for cation exchangecapacity (CEC) and particle-size distributionfrom each sampling depth (table 1).
Plant samples were analyzed for NO 3-, totalN, P, and K as indicated above for watersamples after appropriate digestion orextraction.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Waste Effluent Analysisand Application
Waste water applications at the fields wereinitially at planned rates of 10 cm per irrigationand scheduled at 1-, 2-, or 4-week intervals. Afterthe first irrigation season, we determined thatthe weekly irrigation was excessive and woulddamage the fields; therefore, the weekly
application was eliminated, and these plotswere thereafter irrigated at the schedule ofwaste water application to the entire field area.Schedules A, B, and C corresponded to theirrigation intervals of 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and theD schedule was as needed to dispose of the wastewater on the remainder of the field.Applications varied from 28 to 169 cm per yearat Twin Falls and Rupert and from 114 to 201 cmper year at Nampa for 2 years.
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 3TABLE 1.-Particle-size distribution and soil types at sugarbeet
processing waste water treatment fields
Location(plot No.) Soil depth Clay Sand Silt Soil type
Cm --- Percent-----
TWIN FALLS(A) 0-15 23.2 20.3 56.5 Silt loam.
15-30 22.7 21.3 56.0 Do.30-60 23.2 14.8 62.0 Do.60.90 17.8 18.2 64.0 Do.
90-120 10.2 21.3 68.5 Do.120.150 10.2 22.8 67.0 Do.
(B) 0-15 20.4 19.1 60.5 Do.15-30 22.3 21.6 56.1 Do.30-60 22.8 20.7 56.5 Do.60.90 16.3 17.2 66.5 Do.
90. 120 11.8 19.7 68.5 Do.120-150 11.7 22.8 65.5 Do.
(C) 0-15 22.9 19.6 57.5 Do.15.30 22.3 19.7 58.0 Do.30-60 23.8 18.7 58.0 Do.60-90 20.4 16.8 62.8 Do.
90-120 12.7 17.8 69.5 Do.120.150 10.2 19.8 70.0 Do.
RUPERT(A) 0-15 15.8 59.5 24.7 Sandy loam.
/5.30 16.8 57.3 25.9 Do.30-60 24.8 44.8 30.4 Loam.60-90 26.8 35.6 37.6 Loam/clay loam.
90-120 18.2 35.6 46.2 Loam.120-150 10.7 53.1 36.2 Sandy loam.
(B) 0-15 14.9 63.1 24.7 Do.15-30 15.4 63.6 25.9 Do.30-60 21.8 48.6 30.4 Loam.60.90 15.7 58.6 37.6 Sandy loam.90-120 24.8 16.6 46.2 Silt loam.120-150 22.7 29.6 36.2 Loam/silt loam.
(C) 0-15 16.9 55.6 27.5 Sandy loam.15.30 17.4 54.9 27.7 Do.30-60 22.4 44.6 33.0 Loam.60-90 19.3 55.1 25.6 Sandy loam.90420 15.8 34.7 49.5 Loam/silt loam.120.150 18.2 34.3 47.5 Loam.
NAMPA(B) 0-15 28.8 29.6 41.6 Clay loam/loam.
15-30 19.2 33.2 47.6 Loam.30.60 17.4 36.4 46.2 Do.60-90 21.2 39.8 49.0 Do.
90-120 12.2 53.8 34.0 Sandy loam.120-150 10.2 51.8 38.0 Sandy loam/loam.
(C) 0-15 15.2 43.8 41.0 Loam.15-30 18.2 41.8 40.0 Do.30-60 14.2 51.8 34.0 Sandy loam/loam.60-90 12.6 54.0 33.4 Sandy loam.
90-120 9.4 58.4 32.2 Do.120-150 9.6 50.0 40.4 Loam.
4 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
The nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), andpotassium (K) applications during threesugarbeet processing seasons, as averaged forthe processing seasons, are reported in table 2.N is primarily organic with the mean nitrate•Nconcentration of 0.6 mg/L. Total Kjeldahl N
varied widely at the three processing plantwaste water irrigation fields. At Twin Falls,maximum applied N was 682; minimum, 15; andmean, 133 mg/L. At Rupert, maximum N was135;minimum, 7; and mean, 71 mg/L. AtNampa, maximum N was 54; minimum, 10; and
TABLE 2.—Annual waste water, chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen,phosphorus, and potassium applications on fields irrigated with sugarbeetprocessing waste water
[Dashes indicate no data]
Location(irrigationschedule')
Waterapplied COD Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium
Cm Tons/ha
TWIN FALLS155 139.5 4200
34 2820
74 27.6 776
19 178090 24.2 569
15 1545
87
48.6
1582
13 100583
31.1
864
21 1855138
37.8
980
28 2535
48
22.3 860 7 63063
24.9 672 19 1415106
20.6 738 23 1700
42 17.1 555
14 1095169 46.9 1425
43 3405
RUPERT109 60.6 1150
16 430
113 20.3 745
28 127528 8.1 370
13 490
48 28.0 570 8 19582 14.4 525 20 89528 8.1 370 13 490
15.1 335 5 130
7.9
280 11 470
50
10.0 335
11 51028
8.1 370
13 490
NAMPA192 16.3 430
27 5320
201 18.7 630
49 6350
159 13.7 320 20 4055187 18.4 545 50 5960
116 10.4 277 15 3080114 9.7 383 26 3410
1 See text p. 2 for irrigation frequency.2 Represents Processing season.
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(B)
(C)
(D)
2843
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 5
s,Id
IS
Lt
mean, 35 mg/L in the processing waste water. Pconcentrations were rather low and variedmuch less than N with the mean concentrationsas follows: Twin Falls, 1.9; Rupert, 1.8; andNampa, 1.7 mg P/L. K concentrations were asfollows: Twin Falls, 5.6; Rupert, 3.1; andNampa, 7.2 meq K/L of waste water.
The waste water irrigations all occurredduring the fall, winter, or early sping while thealfalfa or grass was dormant. Summertimeirrigations with canal water for cropmaintenance were made as needed to grow ahay crop.
Chemical Oxygen Demand inWaste Water and in Water
Extracted From the TreatmentField
COD concentrations in the waste watervaried widely with time and locations. At theTwin Falls and Nampa plants, the waste waterwas stored for a short time in ponds before beingpumped to the fields. The storage ponds buffervalue changes in COD concentration by (theadmixture of) a large volume of plant effluents.Early in the first season of operation of thewaste water irrigation system at Twin Falls,concentrated Steffen's waste spilled into thepond. This raised the COD concentration of thepond to over 8000 mg COD/L. In a few weeks,the high COD concentration was diluted out bythe usual lower COD waste water, but largeamounts of COD and other constituents wereapplied to the land when the high concentrationwaste was being distributed to the fields. Theaverage concentration of COD in the Twin Fallswaste water for the second and third processingseasons was approximately 3300 mg/L. At theRupert sugarbeet processing plant waste waterirrigation field, COD concentrations during theprocessing season ranged from 1500 to 5300mg/L and averaged 3300 mg/L for threeprocessing seasons. COD concentrations at theNampa plant were lower than at the other twoplants, ranging from 345 to 2000 mg/L andaveraging 1100 mg/L for two processingseasons (appendix table 1).
COD applications to the waste waterirrigation fields ranged form 7.9 to 139 metrictons/ha-year. The average applications on the
fields outside of the experimental treatmentareas were as follows: Twin Falls, 23; Rupert, 9;and Nampa, 10 metric tons COD/ha-year.These values corresponded to 62, 25, and 24kg/ha-day for the three respective field areascalculated on the basis of 365 days (table 2).
The COD analysis for water samplesextracted from the 150-cm depth in the wastewater irrigation fields were summarized for the2 or 3 years of the experiments (appendix table1). At the Twin Falls waste water irrigationfields, an average of 48 percent COD reductionwas found at the 150-cm depth for the threeprocessing seasons for the 4-week irrigationschedule. The mean waste water COD was 3888and the soil water COD was 2057 mg/L. At theRupert waste water irrigation field, the wastewater COD averaged 3456 and the soil waterCOD 548 mg/L for an average of 84 percentCOD reduction for 3 years. At the Nampa wastewater irrigation field, the waste water averaged1054 and the soil water 268 mg/L for an averageCOD reduction of 75 percent. There was anannual cycle of soil water COD with the highestconcentrations coming during the sugarbeetprocessing season and the lowest values in thesummer.
Soil water analysis for samples taken duringthe summer at the 150-cm depth averaged 97.5,98, and 88 percent COD reduction from theaverage waste water COD concentrationsduring the sugarbeet processing season at theTwin Falls, Rupert, and Nampa plants,respectively.The COD cycle resulted from adecrease in COD application following thesugarbeet processing season and biologicaldecomposition of the added organic materials inthe soil as well as leaching of added organicmaterials. In some areas, the soil is deeper thanthe 150-cm sampling depth, and organicmaterial cleanup by filtration and biologicalactivity will continue as the water infiltrates.This should ultimately produce a clean effluent.
Nitrogen in Waste Water andin Extracted Waste Water Samples
N applications to the general field areasranged from 277 to 1425 kg/ha. Except for the1425-kg application average at Twin Falls, themaximum N application was 555 kg/ha. Theserates can be utilized by growing crops with little
6 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
possibility of high nitrate (NO3-) concentrationsin the forage or of pollution of the ground water.The 4-week irrigation schedule in theexperimental plots received similar amounts ofN to that of the general field applications. Thebest practice, therefore, seems to be to irrigatethe fields with waste water at approximately 4-week intervals with the waste water Nconcentrations generally found in the threewaste waters used at the plants with which weworked. Of course, the other experimentaltreatments applied more N and were generallyhigher than was desirable for best practices inwaste water irrigation as determined by Nfertilization.
High total N was found in the waste watersamples from the Twin Falls plant, whichcorresponded to high COD concentrations earlyin the project. The maximum total N was 680mg/L with an average for the processing seasonof 210 and for the three seasons of 132 mg/L.The average total N remaining in the soil waterat the 150-cm depth was 35 mg/L, whichrepresented a decrease of 97 percent in passagethrough 150 cm of soil. At the Rupert plant, nosuch high N concentrations were found. Theaverage for three processing seasons was 75mg/L with an average soil water Nconcentration of 2.4 mg/L. This represented a98-percent decrease in total N with passage ofthe waste water though 150 cm of soil. At theNampa waste water irrigation field, the averagetotal N for two processing seasons was 36 mg/L.The total N in the soil water at 150 cm was 4mg/L, which represented an 88 percent decreasein organic N.
NO3-N in the waste water at the three wastewater irrigation fields was low with less than 1mg/L at the three locations. Organic N isconverted to NO 3 when the organic matter in thewaste water is decomposed. NO 3 concentrationsin the soil water occasionally reached very highconcentrations. The range at the Twin Fallsfield was 0 to 167 mg NIL with an average of 17mg/L of NO3-N. By removing three high NO 3values from the total before averaging theconcentrations, the mean of the remaining 51values was 8.7 mg NO3-NIL. Many of the soilwater samples had a NO 3-N concentrationbelow 1 mg/L. At the Rupert field, NO3concentrations were considerably lower than at
Twin Falls with a range of 0 to 13 mg/L and anaverage concentration of 2.3 mg NO3-N/L. NO3concentrations at the Nampa waste waterirrigation field were intermediate with a rangeof 0 to 30 mg N/L and an average of 7.8 mg NO3-N/L (appendix table 3).
Phosphorus and Potassium inWaste Water and Extracted
Soil Water
P concentrations in the waste water were low,and, consequently, relatively smallapplications of P were made in the waste water.The normal irrigation rates for the three fieldswould apply P at rates too low to maintain thefields at adequate P levels; therefore, soil testsshould be run periodically to determine the needfor additional P fertilizer.
In the sugarbeet processing waste water atthe Twin Falls site, P averaged 1.9 and rangedfrom 0.8 to 4.1 mg/L. At the Rupert site, theaverage P concentration was 1.8 with a range of0.7 to 4.3 mg/L. At the Nampa site, the averageP concentration was 1.7 with a range of 0.3 to 2.9mg/L. The average concentrations, at the 150-cm depth in the soil at the three sites were 0.19,0.12, and 0.62 mg/L for the Twin Falls, Rupert,and Nampa sites, respectively (appendix table4). P concentrations are low enough for there tobe a minimal amount of P leaching through thesoil. The higher concentration of P in the soilwater at the Nampa site compared with theconcentration of P at the other two sitesprobably is associated with soil differences andis not directly related to P concentrations in thewaste water.
K applications on the waste water irrigationfields were high to very high. The lowest Kconcentrations and applications were found atthe Rupert fields with intermediate values atTwin Falls and the highest at Nampa. Generalfield applications of K ranged from 490 to 3410kg/ha. K fertilization of the waste waterirrigation field was higher than will be neededfor any crop being grown; therefore, an excess ofK will accumulate.
K concentration in the waste water at theTwin Falls waste water irrigation fieldaveraged 5.57 and ranged from 1.1 to 13.2meq/L. At the Rupert site, the average was 3.2
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 7
and the range was 1.6 to 7.3 meq K/L. At theNampa site, the average was 7.3 and the rangewas 3.2 to 14.8 meq K/L. K concentrations in thesoil water extracted from the 150-cm depth were2.3, 0.21, and 0.21 meq K/L for the Twin Falls,Rupert, and Nampa waste water irrigationfields (appendix table 5). A large amount of K isbeing applied to these waste water irrigationfields and varying amounts are being leachedthrough the soil profile. A K equilibrium willprobably be reached after a few years of wastewater irrigation in which the amount of Kleached from the fields will approximately equalthat which is applied in the waste water.
Electrical Conductivity, Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium, SodiumAbsorption Ratios, and pH
Electrical conductivity (EC) and theassociated salt in the waste water is one of thegeneral concerns about irrigating withsugarbeet processing waste water. Appendixtable 6 gives the EC values for waste water andsoil water extracted from several depths in thewaste water irrigation fields at the threelocations. At the Twin Falls site, EC in thewaste water was 2.6 to 6.8; irrigation water, 0.3,and soil water extracted from 150-cm depth, 0.9to 1.7 in summer and 5.2 mmhos/cm 2 in winterduring the waste water irrigation season. At theRupert site, EC values were as follows: wastewater, 1.6 to 3.2; irrigation water, 0.5; and soilwater, 1 to 3 mmhos/cm2. At the Nampa site, ECvalues were: waste water, 2.2 to 6.2; irrigationwater, 0.8; and soil water 1.6 to 5.1 mmhos/cm 2.
Many of the EC values reported for the wastewater and for the soil water extracted from the150-cm depth are too high for growing crops.The quality of the irrigation water used duringthe growing season in every case was good.Irrigation with waste water is a wintertimeoperation at the three locations, and the saltassociated with waste water is applied in thewinter when the crops living on the fields aredormant. During this time, when little water isutilized by the crops, the high saltconcentrations in the water appear to have littleeffect on the crop. Irrigating with good qualitywater in the spring and during the croppingseason leaches the salt from the root zone and
lowers the EC to acceptable levels for growingthe alfalfa and grass hay.
Calcium (Ca) concentrations in the wastewater and in the soil water extracted fromseveral depths in the soil are reported inappendix table 7. Soluble Ca in the waste wateris fairly high because hydrochloric acid is usedto dissolve accumulated lime from the sirupevaporators between batches as needed. Thespent acid wastes, containing large amounts ofcalcium chloride, are discharged into thesugarbeet flume system from which theoverflow is used for irrigation. Caconcentrations in the waste water at the variouslocations are as follows: Twin Falls: wastewater, 1.8 to 26.4, averaging 9.4; irrigationwater, 2.2; and soil water, 2 to 40 meq/L. Rupert:waste water, 2.7 to 19.6, averaging 5.4;irrigation water, 2.8; and soil water, 3.5 to 19meq/L. Nampa: 3.6 to 16.5, averaging 6.3;irrigation water, 1.8; and soil water, 3.6 to 34.4meq/L. These examples of soil water Caconcentrations were from samples that wereextracted from the 150-cm soil depth. This andseveral other depths are reported in appendixtable 7.
Magnesium (Mg) concentrations in the wastewater and in soil water extracted from severaldepths in the soil are reported in appendix table8. Mg in the waste water originates from twosources: at the Twin Falls factory, the majorsource was the Steffen House waste; at the othertwo locations, impurities were removed from thesugar by ion exchangers. Recharging the ionexchangers with magnesium chloride is thesource of much of the Mg found in the wastes atthe Rupert and Nampa plants, Mgconcentrations in the waste water and soilwater at the various locations are as follows:Twin Falls: waste water, 1.5 to 6.8, averaging4.0; irrigation water 1.4; and soil water at 150-cmdepth, 1.9 to 20.8 meq/L. Rupert: waste water,1.6 to 7.1, averaging 2.8; irrigation water, 1.7;and soil water, 2.2 to 13.7 meq/L. Nampa: wastewater, 4.7 to 18.3, averaging 11.6; irrigationwater, 1.1; and soil water, 2.7 to 26.9, averaging13.6 meq/L.
Sodium (Na) concentrations in the wastewater and the soil water extracted from severaldepths in the soil are reported in appendix table9. Na in these systems is derived from (1) the
8 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
sugarbeets being processed, (2) the smallamount in the source water, and (3) the soil. Naconcentrations in the sampled waters at thevarious locations was as follows: Twin Falls:waste water, 5.4 to 14.6, averaging 8.7;irrigation water, 0.7; and soil water 3.2 to 13.4meq/L. Rupert: waste water, 0.9 to 5.8,averaging 2.0; irrigation water, 1.2; and soilwater, 1.8 to 6.0 meq/L. Nampa: waste water, 3.2to 11.2, averaging 6.0; irrigation water, 1.7, andsoil water, 1.0 to 10.1 meq/L. Because of theabundant supply of Ca and Mg in the wastewater and the soil water, Na leaches readilythrough the soils. The Na concentration in thesoil water directly reflects the concentration inthe waste water and indicates that Na isleaching without building up in the soil.
Sodium absorption ratios (SAR) calculatedfrom the mean values for Na, Ca, and Mg ateach sampling date and site at the variousdepths are reported in appendix table 10. TheSAR values at all of the sampling sites, in all thewaste water samples, and in all of the soil watersamples are low enough that there should be noproblems with Na buildup and loss of soilinfiltration capacity because of irrigating withthese waste waters. Waste water SAR values atTwin Falls, Rupert, and Nampa ranged from 1.8to 8.8, 1.0 to 3.2, and 1.6 to 4.1, respectively. SARvalues in the irrigation water at the threelocations were 0.7 , 0.8, and 1.1, respectively. Soilwater SAR values ranged from 1.6 to 3.0, 1.0 to2.0, and 0.6 to 5.6, respectively, for the threelocations. All of these values are considerablybelow the value that would pose a Na hazard inthe soil.
The pH values for waste water, irrigationwater, and soil water extracted from severaldepths in the field are reported in appendix table11. The pH values reported in table 11 are allwithin the normal range for neutral tocalcareous soils and, with the exception of onepH value of 10.6 found at Twin Falls, werebetween 6.6 and 8.4. With these values, there isno reason to be concerned about the soil or waterpH resulting from irrigation with thesesugarbeets processing waste waters.
Chlorides, Sulfates, andBicarbonates in Water SamplesAppendix tables 12, 13, and 14 contain data
on chloride, sulfate, and bicarbonate
concentrations in waste water, irrigation water,and soil extracts from the sugarbeet wastewater irrigation fields. Chloride concentrationsin the waste water were 8, 8, and 23 meq/L atTwin Falls, Rupert, and Nampa. The higherconcentration of chloride at Nampa resultedfrom ion exchanger recharge with magnesiumchloride. The same system was used at Rupert,but apparently the backwash from the ionexchangers was diluted more there. Chlorideleaches readily through the soil, and theresulting soil water chloride concentrationswere similar to the waste water concentrations.At the three locations, they ranged from 3.1 to11.0 at Twin Falls, 0.7 to 11.0 at Rupert, and 3.6to 38.3 meq/L at Nampa waste water irrigationfields.
Sulfate concentrations were relatively low atthe three waste water irrigation systems,averaging 1.5, 1.1, and 0.7 meq/L at Twin Falls,Rupert, and Nampa, respectively. The sulfatealso leached readily through the soil, andconcentrations in the soil solution were similarto those in the waste water with values of 0.1 to 5meq/L at the three locations in the soil solution.
Bicarbonate concentrations in the wastewater at Twin Falls ranged from 13.2 to 49.5,averaging 31 meq/L; at Rupert, the range was 2to 27.5, averaging 11.1 meq/L and, at Nampa,the range was 5 to 13, averaging 9 meq/L. Theirrigation water ranged in bicarbonate at thethree locations from 2 to 4 meq/L. Soil waterextracted from the 150 cm depth in the soilranged in bicarbonate from 2.3 to 41, 1.9 to 24,and 2.6 to 15 meq/L at Twin Falls, Rupert, andNampa, respectively. This anion also leachesreadily as indicated by the soil waterbicarbonate concentrations that were similar tothe waste water bicarbonate concentrations.
Composition of Harvested HayChemical composition of the harvested hay
samples for 1976, 1977, and 1978 are given intable 3. These analyses include NO 3-N, total N,P, K. The total N analyses include nitrates andrepresent a fairly wide range of values from 1.63to 3.88 percent total N. This corresponds to acrude protein concentration of 10.2 to 24.2percent (total N x 6.25). The NO 3 concentrationsof the initial samplings were relatively high,ranging up to 9,500 p/m NO 3-N.
Values above 2,000 p/m NO 3-N are considered
9TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER
TABLE 3.-Analyses of hay samples grown on sugarbeetprocessing waste water irrigation fields
[Dashes indicate no datil
DateNitrate-nitrogen
Total Phosphorusnitrogen
Potassium
PI pm ------------Percent ----------------
TWIN FALLS
------
July 1976 2,250 2.22 0.21 2.78June 1977 3,520 2.22 0.24 3.00Aug. 1977 1,090 2.98 0.30 3.88Oct. 1977 2,020 3.10 0.25 3.14June 1978 330 1.66 0.22 3.27July 1978 560 2.44 0.20 2.72Sept. 1978 810 2.70 0.29 3.04
RUPERTJuly 1976 3,540 2.52 0.32 2.66June 1977 1,000 1.63 0.28 2.99Aug. 1977 310 1.80 0.23 2.76June 1978 560 0.28 2.71Sept. 1978 415 2.41 0.21 2.08
NAMPAOct. 1976 9,500 3.08 0.62 4.06May 1977 780 3.45 0.39 3.71June 1977 220 2.32 0.35 3.69July 1977 230 2.62 0.38 2.72May 1978 70 1.65 0.23 3.10July 1978 875 3.88 0.46 3.40Sept. 1978 415 3.06 0.30 2.10
to be hazardous to livestock. In this case, thelivestock should be conditioned to highconcentrations of nitrate or the feed should bediluted with other feed containing less nitrate(11). P concentrations in the forage ranged fromadequate (0.2 percent) to high (0.6 percent) andshould provide a P-sufficient ration forlivestock. K concentrations in the forage werealso adequate to high. With the amount ofpotassium being applied in the waste water, theK content will continue to be high in the forage.
Soil Analysis
Soil samples were taken in the waste waterirrigation fields at the beginning and end of theresearch project. Appendix table 15 gives dataon the soil analysis for organic matter, total N,K, Ca, Mg, Na, sulfate, SAR, pH, and EC. Theseanalyses were made on soil samples obtainedfrom six depths from the surface to 150 cm deep.
SUMMARYWaste water irrigation rates of 10 cm per
irrigation at intervals of 1, 2, or 4 weeks wereestablished at three sugarbeet processing wastewater irrigation fields in southern Idaho. Therates of irrigation used by the sugar companyfor disposal of their waste water on the balanceof the fields were also monitored. Waste waterapplications ranged from 28 to 169 cm per yearwith additional water used during the summer
to grow the hay crops on the fields. The organicmatter applied in the waste water (COD) rangedfrom 7.9 to 140 metric tons per year or 22 to 383kg/ha-day. These highest rates appliedexcessive amounts of organic matter andnutrients to the fields. The range of organicmatter applied to the general field areas thatwere not in the experimental plots was 10 to 47metric tons/ha-yr.
10 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
N applications in the waste water rangedfrom 280 to 4200 kg N/ha-yr with the range forthe general field area being 277 to 1425 kg N/ha-yr. P applications were relatively low for wastewater irrigation with 5 to 50 kg P/ha-yr beingapplied. K applications were, in many cases,very high with a range of 130 to 6350 kg K/ha-yr. The lower N application rates could beutilized by growing plants, but the highest rateswere in excess of crop requirements or croputilization capacity. In many cases, Papplications were lower than crop requirementsand would therefore require periodic soil testsand perhaps P fertilization. K applications inthe waste water were high to very high and willprobably reach an equilibrium where theapplied K will leach through the soil at about thesame rate that it is applied.
EC and salts in the waste waters are high tovery high and would pose serious problems forirrigating crops if the waste water were usedduring the growing season. Winter irrigationwith the waste water, when crops are dormant,
decreases the problems of salinity. Salts can beleached from the root zone of the plants withgood quality irrigation water before the haybegins to grow in the spring. Even though alarge amount of salt was leached through thesoil in these waste water irrigation fields, thecrops grew satisfactorily and the system workswell and looks good. Leaching of organicconstituents of the waste water has been greaterthan would be desired. Measurements at the150-cm depth showed lower values of CODremoval than were found with potatoprocessing waste water (25). Irrigation withgood quality water in the summer has given thefields time to recover from organic loading, andthe soil micro-organisms decomposed the addedorganic residues.
The design and management of these wastewater irrigation fields has been excellent. Itshould be possible to continue irrigating thesefields with sugarbeet processing waste water formany years if the loading is not increased abovethat observed in these experiments.
LITERATURE CITED
(1) AHRTANo. D.C.. A.E. EiticEsoN, A.R. Wol.coTT.andEws.
1974. CERTAIN ENV] RoNMENTAL PROBLEMS ASSO-
CIATED WITIE LONG TERM LANE) DISPOSAL OF FOOD 1110 -
ESSING WASTES In Proceedings of the 1974 CornellAgricultural Waste Management Conference.,N.Y. State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences,Ithaca, N.Y.: 222-223.
(2) NovAE. A.E. ERICKSON, and others.1975. EFEE("rs .()F LONG TERM LAND DisPOSAL El?
SPRAY IRRIGATION OF FOOD PROCESSING WASTES ON
SOME CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOLE, AND
SUBSURFACE WA'l • ER Journal of EnvironmentalQuality 4(21:242-248.
(3) AMERICAN; PUBLIC HEALTH ASSoCIATION,
1971. STANDARE) METHODS FOR THE. EXAMINAT111N OF
WATER AND WAR ET WATER Thirteenth Edition, 874 p.,New York.
(4) Bol:r()N. P.1947. CANNERY WASTE DISPOSAL. RY FlEE.TE IRRIGATION.
Food Packer 38:42-43, 46.
(0) Bu rri.•R. R.M., N.II. Wootawi. and E.A. MYERS.1974. SPRAY-IRRIGATION DISPOSAL. ()E WASTE WATER.
Pennsylvania State University Special CircularNo. 185, 17 p.
(6) DE HA.NN, F.A.M., and Rd. ZWERMAN
1973. LANE) DISPOSAL OF POTATO SPAR[ II PRocEssim;WASTE WATER IN 'ME NKTHERLANDS In Proceedings ofthe 1973 Cornell Agricultural Waste ManagementConference, New York State College of Agricultureand Life Sciences, Ithaca, N.Y.: 222-228.
(7) IloocEvEEN. and F. RIEM1973. ASPECTS OE AGRECI E LTURAL E;sp: (IF v(a..yro
STARCH wAsTE WATEN Netherlands Journal of Agri-cultural Science 21:58-1-14.
(8) FISH•R. and J.H. SNITCH
1975. AN At1ToMAT1C SYSTEM FHB. SAMPLINt n PROE•sS
ING WASTE WA. tER. Soil Science Society of AmericaProceedings l8(2):382-384.
(9) (iII.IIF. I..C., A.S. KEsTER. J.P. LAW, and others.1971. A SPRAY IRRIGATION SYSTEM FIER "TREATMENT E q.'
CANNERY WASTES. Journal of the Water PollutionControl Federation 43(10):2011.
(10) GERNIIAM, C.F., and T.K. NEHvEn.1974. 'TRY:ATM-W.11i S'r(lIIlES (IF THREE Forn ) pRocE . s.
INC. PLANT WASTE WATERS. Purdue UniversityEngineering Extension Service Bulletin No. 145,Part 1:283-289.
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 11
(11) HILL, R.M., R.L. OGDEN, and C.W. ACKER-30N1972. NITRATE TOXICITY IN FORAGE, FACT OR FICTION ,
Nebraska Farm, Ranch and Home Quarterly, Fall1972:18-20.
(12)Koo,R.C.J.1974. IRRIGATION OF CITRUS WITH CITRUS PROCESSING
WASTE WATER. Government Reports Announce-ments 74(4):104-105.
(13) LOEHR, R.C.1974. AGRICULTURAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, PRO-
BLEMS, PROCESSES, APPROACHES. Academic Press, Inc.,New York:576 p.
(14) MEYER, J.L.1974. CANNERY WASTE WATER FOR IRRIGATION AND
GROUND WATER RECHARGING. California Agriculture28(8):12, 18.
(15) OVERMAN, A.R., and HSIAO-CHING, Ku1976. EFFLUENT IRRIGATION OF RYE AND RYEGRASS
Journal of the Environmental Engineering Divi-sion, American Society of Civil Engineers102(EE2):475-483.
(16) PEARSON, G.A.1975. RESPONSE OF ASPARAGUS TO APPLICATIONS OF
SIMULATED VEGETABLE PROCESSING WASTE WATER
Journal of Environmental Quality 4(3):337-339.
(17) W.G.J. KNIBBE, and H.L. WORLEY.
1972. COMPOSITION AND VARIANCES OF WASTE WATERFROM FOOD PROCESSING PLANTS. U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Agricultural Research Service,ARS 41-186, 10 p. [Series discontinued; Agricul-tural Research Service is now Science and Educa-tion Administration-Agricultural Research.]
(18) RAUSCHKOLB, R.S., R.D. BOTTEL, J. PANDERHILL, andothers.1975. LAND APPLICATION OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLF:
CANNERY BY•PRoDucTS California CooperativeExtension Soil and Water Newsletter No. 26, p. 3-4.
(19) REED. A.D., W.E. WILDMAN, W.S. SEYMAN, and others.1973. SOIL RECYCLING OF CANNERY WASTES. Cali-
fornia Agriculture 27:6-9.
(20) SHANNON, S., M.T. Virrum, and G.H. GIBBS1968. IRRIGATING WITH WASTE WATER FROM PRocE:Ss.
[NG PLANTS. New York Agricultural ExperimentStation, Geneva, Cornell University Research Cir-cular No. 10, 9 p.
(21) SMITH, J.H.1974. DECOMPOSITION IN SOIL OF WASTE COOKING OILS
USED IN POTATO PROCESSING. Journal of Environ-mental Quality 3(3):279-281.
(22)1976. TREATMENT OF POTATO PROCESSING WASTE
WATER ON AGRICULTURAL LAND. Journal of Environ-mental Quality 5(1):113-116.
(23) C.W. ROBBINS, and C.W. HAYDEN.1975. PLANT NUTRIENTS IN POTATO PROCESSING WASTEWATER USED FOR IRRIGATION. In Proceedings of the26th Annual Pacific Northwest Fertilizer Con-ference, Salt Lake City, Utah, July 15-17,1975:159-165.
(24)-E.G. GILBERT, and J.B. MILLER.1976. REDOX POTENTIALS AND DENITRIFICATION IN A
CROPPED POTATO PROCESSING WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
FIELD. Journal of Environmental Quality5(4):397-399,
(25)-CW. ROBBINS, J.A. BONDURANT, and C.W.HAYDEN.1977. TREATMENT OF POTATO PROCESSING WASTE
WATER ON AGRICULTURAL LAND; WATER AND ORGANIC
LOADING, AND THE FATE OF APPLIED PLANT NUTRIENTS.
In Proceedings 1976 Cornell Agricultural WasteManagement Conference, April 28-30, 1976,Rochester, N.Y.
(26) R.G. GILBERT, and J.B. MILLER.1978. REDOX POTENTIALS IN A CROPPED POTATO PROC-
ESSING WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FIELD WITH A DEEPWATER TABLE. Journal of Environmental Quality7(4):571-574.
(27) -C.W. RoBBINS, J.A. BONDURANT, and C.W.HAYDEN.
1978. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF POTATO PROCESS.ING WASTE WATER BY IRRIGATION. U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Conservation Research Report No. 22,43 p.
(28) SODERQUIST, M.R., G.I. BLANTON, JR., and D.W. TAYLoR.1972. CHARACTERIZATION OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE
PROCESSING WASTE WATERS. Proceedings of theThird National Symposium on Food ProcessingWastes, EPA-R2-72-018, p. 409-436.
(29) and J.L. GRAHAM.1977. FRUIT-, VEGETABLE-, AND GRAIN-PROCESSING
WASTES. Journal of the Water Pollution ControlFederation 49(6):1118.1123,
(30)Timm. H., N.B. AKESSON, M. O'BRIEN, and others.
1976. SOIL, AND CROP RESPONSE TO VARIABLE LOADING
OF CANNING WASTES. Presented at American Societyof Agricultural Engineers meetings at Davis,Calif., June 1976.
(31) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.1974. METHODS FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
AND WASTES. U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, EPA-625-/6-74-003, 298 p.
(32) WHITE, J.W., JR.
1973. PROCESSING FRUIT AND VEGETABLE WASTES. InSymposium on Processing Agricultural and Muni-cipal Wastes, G.E. Inglett, editor, p. 129-142.
11."
0z
0
1§1 g !E§ 10 q7• 1-1
gl* 1000,ANVt- t-m,rm
R8t9.22AteMAc74'NN
1n1
010100k0Q0ulOOMMODM .r
8E100010Nmr-V
•Tr 'V
0 004tM'OOM
It a00 1.0
oom§t-qt,.mc mCNI 1-1
-
ILO 0 0 0 in 0 C=7 0 LO r13 iCtM1u3 40§P8.RS 432 741
1.1
EtRY-122Pt-mm . ..N8'489'Oki] LOOk00
. RoP2 7-i LCcq,
5 0 0 0 §Okt0
NC-W T.1 ca NILOm
rd. 1-1
8ER2 § § OR 84 8 2"'RE-- .er ,eP
rn-n
'• 421 1 °;IVCt"
g 4§28VVVVV
• AW4
tf -gt •VnU• :0pH HEM ME L,1C0 .0. .ret MerePCO 3ereP
2884tH§N .§. 842i74,Imi
o o coom P88"4 g 8 282P8'nt`•Csi •-n C-4 •-n
L.D 88F2F2 5128222
8?2=i428 P,-;$sase
ca .§ gg 2En, StRF2 2
0
gi" 8 9IAR ---CO"
10 incv
E . mmt,
ca g 4E32°1-1
E0 .21§AR §§R'f."2.1c9
• UHEEn FUMEI§§§888 ra'te g n
QL0L001.00
01.0001.00ki70.-tcvm1-1 4-I C.4 er
0 ink00an 0mAtin1000 LOONkCJO0
"1: Ri l''.4CV CV CO1 4EPRI
000000 100000•-ammmeqx0 -100 .me.1r.• -n
CTS
.52 g 8888 1.-x?.R88881-1
Q as
W,2.R82R8
12 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
ICI
zO4O4
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 13
P2F-'888 228PS 2
O 0 4, U,, OD N uP er VD cv
LIP uP0 gl 4 8 2 58 2 gi 4 58 2 2 P. fR
LA 4 g g2 V2 2 2 2 2 58 2 te
CD uP en uP uP uP CD uP CD uP up CD3 00 t- op en CV oD VD VD VD OD .mr
ea
I I I I I I
p... uP CD u7 CD u7 CD uP CD LP uP CD CD CD CD en CD CD r- CD OP CD CV CV el. .--4 OD PP CV Cn VD PD
►..-. ", 6)u n ma. -.0 VD CO 0
G4qI7 i-4
dt -2 F. S CD0,
1 CD cu un " Cn '
e z ca
N ,4 en cn '"-I .1.--I
u7 0 CD00 40 P..er 0 mm § '
'
8=.
on un en
2 2 8on er er
un u er,-.1 1
n-1 .1.--1
c73, tnCV CV
04;A_
C4
RES'422a
CD un c? CD uP un gn c? un un cp A A 5 14 '4 1.2. S 1.?. t5CO VD vo '0 (C CI cp up uP t- on OO ClN 1.-1
ou7 en 0 CD 0 ut unCD CD o (C m, mr mr N OD CA
CD 0 Cn 0 un Ca un un un un 0 Ca 0cma on mr mad er UP uP PP on mi. mr mr un
1-1 rA (C
2282 3 RPESR,S.)4—I v—I v—I
g8 , 4 2 58 2 58 4 4 4 58 58 a:.
o ooin o o oN N oD N UP Cn 00 N en 00 '010, 4, ,
0
1,9 2 53 g 2 58 23 53 5R 5.3 58 CP CP CD en en 0 CD 0 I;" 0, OD Cq0
4, ,4 0, CO OD v 4
0
GG E3
CD uP uP CDCV CV CD Cn
' C4 ' .t CV UP
0 0 0 VP d kraN ( 1r) 0 on
rn un 0 0 o
LL) 0 eDLt
c•P•-•
0 4 0 Ck'CM 00`
0 IN- CI5
CD 0 4, 0 CD uPca N VD VD
Ln CD u7 CD CD.3n In 47 In
un en L un L enun er =r un
kra kra L) kra LL"eq N
4 0 L0 0 0ce N CV O N (C
OnNCra
NNC71
C.cr)
C
C.
4)
C)orl1-z
0z
oC.try
1111
eZa *'
I I
0 0 o §c4
I I I
...
...
oun on o-
o- onkr) a,
0
CD LC CD c?CV VD ce CD
uP CD u70
CD0,
uPLO LO 0 up C)
L( - (COD C‘i
Cl 1-z
ILO 0 LO A'.941,-.S. *3.0 0 CV 0 o0
cv -4—I 4—I 7-1
0 0 0 0 04P7(0 07 0 c0
c•I vrC.
•e4...
4 c:".. 0 0 0 0 5? 4,42, R 53 gi Fa 2cip kr7
6/P114-1 1-1
4-1co4 rE
anz* .=,0
Lc, L.0o 'Lc 8Cn3
0•J t0 cc'
' n2 S
2A
o0 4 0 0
CV OP CV N(C VP on CD en on
PP-8261869
00V380 R
711 :1; 4,n14nF
1n1
2828§F2
COCO 7-'7 § 8
`48.18RE g RRRPR2
'4824'42.74
CO ... gq {
X
CIRCO CO CO
8 g 28P-.84n1 1n1
tLI g388F. F.,
14 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
49 R g F.,&i g i c515 4" 8el to
8t9-84ARcicomm.
1n41.1 .,19n1
§
82 g Rtt:n ',9,
5P tP..R8RFL§ 12R538F..11
CJ
22
m m
(7,
A
z
X
;41
1:14
0vnI
NLt.
Co
oN
LDNN N
C.N
01COt+ 04
Co Crt eh ehc7 Cq
8
0-1 -1COA 2 01 CI
Ul CI CO 0) COOD C Co N N Co
Ls: 4p CD4q 4; CO q 4; 41 "1 41 CO C.;ci -4 ,0 00 CA C4 CA 1-4 CA C4 CA C4
000 to.. co A co r-
QD. V• 073. CA 0D
03.C9C4 M nr cq
07? *4. DR 01 DD. Co4.4 an 02 N V. V. Cou7 uy
O —I N•e c.0 N LC
-" 0? '1 0? '0!`4,-.N XRA2
'it '1 q Ci 2DCO 'cr. ut CC uo ci
N '0' "0:
^0^0j N .4
N NN
cl CA CO
CyF.
.5. 2is .2
Is is124
1a4d •
a
tbD
CO VI
t-N
r.;0m
z
2i
›,
q c'?1'1
w1.11 U, 1r
GV
c*. 0? 0?4 0
nr n•Co 10 c4nr
Cfl q CC!CO0 CO N CA
CO t4 COC1.1C.1 • wo
1/1 4.4et) CO cR. *10 p . 0 CI.3
ti. 2 s'D •-n C•4
*4 '4"CU 0 *7 01 "1
ri N2 CO CO 01
4% 2yyts
2
ic
4
q qC•• ••1C1
`1: q' Stp-SXZ
o q to.• •
,E7.1Dc4
r;iuto itN 41 .CO — Co
2 a 4Cq Es: 01
1.4 CD Q er CVCD C... co cp r-
GNICi V] CI CA CI: U7 C]
43 CO !Li 0-8 2 c.Lico
eti
Clq tt:!"' CA rA
R'4a88a8
c.i
rss
co 0
•n1 gnL
° 1:01/1 PO
CA U7 tgOD CA C4 4.0 MD
••• mw
• qqqto '0!. co
nr
U, 0 Cg Cg• C4 CC/
00 C7
A"'nr 001.0 co cl ,0N
NC700 vi! C; vr CDgn N co Co co nr c4
co nr uo no 01-4 -4 N N
4; 4; q Cl CoC.- C4 QD Cb C4
ul "1 r7 Cq 41 '1C4 Cl '' CO V. N
NN 6 t--: 4e4
Cl C7 Cl '01 ,11 *i *R "0 "01-4 -4 . N co P +.• rw 07
CO 471 Cli
MCCC')
" St3 01 N..8 :37, 8
U.?CO N
2 0 wpl CO
NC .4 6-00
ut or), co c-QD▪ Mr 4.5 c4
1,2888a8 2888 5 F_,
rr
541a8RFA 1.-.928Ra8
N Cf1 MCO .c1. 0 0 in
ct co. N
CID 00 Cl
Cl CO sq oq -1 N CO. .71 CD ulo,0, c4
0I ea oq cr nrIL) PO 1-0 1.-1
if? N CD CO CD 0) DI2 CI 0 CO 01 CO N
CO DR q Lc? 00• 07 C4 CA
11? DR10 N 0 01 CO N
•-1 C. el "4: •0:er NI. Cl N CV C4
8F-2PA2P04
COCO M. N e.C!
r4 CV *4 C4 c4
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 15
16 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
111..
t
'1Z1ee
FS
be"e.
as 2
oa
Ct. cc 2
6* ;.213 4._1* 0
co
E
13 *a
e
:15*
EIS 44...
e4
4-4
[-OS
]1
e012
'a eled beg
pn
0
2
z
0
r. •0V
.1 CI CRnr C4 CC
mt CD Cq Nen nr C4 0- cg
ri CC r7 r7 0t- UR cc en C4 nr
CD on N cc u,4 uc c4 A
N csaOaC70Cma
40 cc an C4 CD,4 ,4 -4_
4 C4 t".,140 ci -4 1-1 eq
en co; co el tinC4 CV Ci 00 p4
a..
ti cl OR q 0; 0q Ch+Vd•CD+rC N
04
CO CO 4 CP uR4 nr t- +C. 4 1-1
.1 4 4nr CO CO +V N N
4 UR CR OR 4C4 nr C4 CV CV
ezeboeccen,4 A A A ci
t2,53 2c.›
t-C-•4-1
0 in=01-3
N5x
m•g
44C
44
P.f
la)
OS
&4.1014
44
A
0
ii
I.;0.
111 CZ440 CO ci A k
0to •-•
cc! 4 t2LI1 't Cn C? CC: q -1 "1 L". CC! CC!CO CD N g
tc` 'Cla
N tri Cl 4 cq co. n.9 n op 10 In C0 In N 0-:r0 •-• cm V ...I c4
PL4 OfZ Oq 41MP 40 1-1 • • Z "
te! Ls: t "L:!.1 CO • p4 C4 CI
cc? -4: 13:!r-4 CC VI 0
on ma mr m o..7! Cb CD t- CbCD 0 • N 4 • C4 C4 06 .4 •
CA LP OD C7 q C9 ILICO.01 C4 C4 C4 ut .1. 1 eq ':N • CC
9 `41 SSES `41R@SE2 "4 SgaLS
va
-,..,_29111111M.M1n
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 17
re 009-1 p cc; 0 4
9-1
Cq CI CI C9 '1vd, 1 .1.-1 et N
N N
t-,D 4-I4-1 1-1
N
t- O.
N
1.0
CD
w CV Nt •7 °Rtc;
.0 -A tt re
Ad
er CII 116. C4
N 1 CC €71
07 CI CI 1C1 c? •7CO
9-1 1-1
ul d esN •-n
Cb -1-1
1C1 l[J ,-; N
CC
CD aS °R
c0 N
el 01 u? A V '1Cl OD re re CV C4
CI CO OD CI et CD-4 ey en 44
N N N q1 Chi et
q? a7 u? e? N *11-4 1 •I 1-1 CC .cr
q q1 pA 4 CV C4 -er
eN
Co
N
N COC7C4 UD 1 re QD .0
44 .4,
eq 07 01 °:CO C4 UD CP OD ODCo re
'1 '1 V. A CIre CV
"! N q
aDL-a).41 $47
.g
2
z
et
GL
tl
Cq4.• CO 9•4
QD et OR 04 CI CDes5 e4 cv ea -4
e; A A OmN Cy re 1 re C4re
N at! en O7.11 r72 1.4
CqN v? '00OD OD C.. 1 re -
.• en alas .r -A2 us en r.:
CR OD re en CO CV N
OR QI C0 OR et PR'
eg r- .1 en en alCr) v• I
crl Co N05 .4t NC4
E": "4 V:cl,t c, .
CP CO a; A C.: a;N
N C.7 CO •-n N I-I,-o
nri, .r N 137, t.7Co w -
CO GO 0tiff •
en oG r-; r-
Co F".LC n.,/ 9-1
CI A a; AA04 re re 1 re re
en ce! .1 enCV 1-4 0-1
Ocy
•• en e73 uq es! q00 4n4 PM .0 re re9..1
C4 GO 00 CD] r7.• 41
CR U7 CD re or!.A -4 .•
41 eci 41:1 0N
CO CV CC 4/ed e4 MN _
M V. FlGO 1
O1 CC
OR V.- PR VI CI NCV ei OD cy 44
1-1 4 •!
aril CDre re 1 CO ti
1 reOR C4[BUR 01Nre N re re C4 CV
NJ! q. . 1 9n1 9-1 I. to
N q• N3
PR C4 CR et ORop Ch re N re re
re
CV CPO CI C9 CIO
0CR VI CI a.7Cpr C4e.ftr
A V: A '1 A AOD 13. 04 N 1.-4 re
. . CV 1 1 N P 4••1 re 4.4
Nt e4 q OI C4 C4 CRCI CD CI Co 111N -4.0
"11.4 4 v-1 1
re V. . N
P'44R8RFA
CO Co Co NN N et C4 C4
;288E .q .§ V-9RSSFA9;288888
9nI 9nI t2iRSE?§
5 0 ea
0 la AC Q
Jf.-1
18 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
IS8
O
0,) .5.2
.8 74. 15e
P/Z
.S1.
to 151ta
z
al
0:103
gsL. 44
to el;.t
L. 4.,
NNen
P-D
1=1
Dz
0
4A
O CD4 Co C-., CA CC
cD R°1 0/C • §* •
q c! cqq nc?0 '2E2 F42
cle888 g 2
CI C; 0; A1 CD! 117.
CD C] 01 CA A1 01CO C4
4 §0 0/ q 00 q CI
I
Fr 0..
"
1,
1-11-1 .1. VM
'TN el el el .cqq
oR ul m ul u1 ul0 .
01 mr. el e/ 0/ e; CCC4 CD CD CD G? A co 0
CA cbti . CD CD CD 4:5 CD C;et.
CO U3 m Co CO F-7 0/. 0/ Cocd pi a ma TA C4
N CD t7 1[401, 41 'T NCCg 1. 74a
cl cy " eR c/ tc/ C 'Tit.-.MMCON0DR2 t?
mm " cq e/ 0/N
ap i=g• g cD u7 cn ei co ''t- ACq
O C; 01 OD M M cl q 'l qul c!of Ci M07.-iADr-§ te ADC-C-COCI
000c1 DJ i4 q'T q 'T .T41cm no
c/ ci cq -IR Ls: U1 en ul C4 CiCo C4 U7 u7 C4 C4
'T. Ls: "1 "t "1 CI 'I 03
cq CON Ci"1: 'T CI CI CI 41 Cl- M 2 N.-I
oR oR coNOCo cl m el a; cq ciO r-muo CANOD
.1: 41 C81 C1 41 C1u7 OD CA 00
"0; 14! a! 01 Cl LC C] M Cl
• giRM .ti msav
TM MI! CD 0 CD rl ampul ul mr
ul e/ gi4q0/ cq C:1 U1 01 Ci CC!1.0 CO CO C. Co
Co OD u7 9.4 ' 10 Er. vnIEw
I:4
CI Cq CI 41 CI 41 IC CV el oR co ciMc NMODC-M07
1.4 Si t- Ir M
C1 C1 cl an dr.
OR,trO w eses
'c/ v.0. cl e4 e4co u uR 't AD Cl Cl CI N CI Cl Ci Cl N CI CI
CAwq.'tq qq{l 't CI q rl CD. CI Cr; A; (41 U1 01 U1 el! 01 A;
-.4 q A CI CA NI.C4 CI CI C4 CI M C4C4 1.4 N
bez
c/e4 0/ "1:0/uRu/ "1: e4" g AMWdm .l. Op N "1 Co Co Cl
CO 2 Si 1eiR a; c4 el
-4 uiCp uo.CA C; C; A1 OnCZ 1.4 C4 ,r1.4
q t". e/ cc! Cl q °1 Cl 41 CC: "1 C; 41 CC! C.1 C1 CI "° t"1 c": -" N03 cn C4 C7
ClVQ .0070DU7 rA i4 lt Co 00 M 0
r1 .1.1e4 F- CD Ci C- 07
v-I 1n1 vnI
L.088E9 0 2c9SER2 ;-9,988§§
r!5' 14 RERF. § . 2R2 g §§
Iv
cci 0-•-•olp45 0 -0cci /mpg
NE414:4
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 19
-1 -1 lc.00
ci cI cR c9 c1 14
-1 cs; ul CRNe.T un,-1
wr, c9 co wr Acm cm co
A A A ms, Rm.
mm,-IvAmCq ,4
0°14.4" q t1g S; L; °8"'
ci ccl qqt1R^!minor-m.44 F-1
•=4
A
11.ri)
-10. d,er
Op Op cc •3•owmacm
••la
© /41
Aqgea
cA
441er
0.4 0 0
a:?Cr) CV
N caD N
al v: 0? a,cm ,4.441
mod
]A`ci
es) we oqN C '21
un,0000-.0
N 000=0
-LEI o
C4 Cl N d C N1.0 07 0
t-- t--
NoC7NQ c
1-zcl qm0E,-occip
C4 cowe
N ' 8 g
CO
N
cc
' 2%41 —'2q 141 "1
• rA'
rd
8 z P
tel'a! 00-odr0
pW
000m
al a? 1'1 a? 00 14=. c.p mcommmq -4 ms
qq '1: al eG c; v7 a? cg! "1 '"!MWer8g ;1
on
'1 C4 q aq q C4,-oR RN,-10")24222.
AP c9 -e -1 0/ 0/ N
AN 2? cgc 4
,t m o,"..; 2 2 F.1
.4t
CG CI 71 'te; rn S c4 ,-! Cl u? cl ro.r7) QD Co
2 c°A. w 0•2 8 8 F, P2888E§ 288882 222822 82 14.i28R82
vnI vnI r4
8
6 • 6:-
CA
1-0
000
0%0X
1n1
0
00 . c0
wr
cc II? N cr qQD CC7CON
A ml A• CO er • •
N r- q q
c1'rqq *.10 CO N 0 C9t--
et co e' C7 N cl ol cc.' qq45 r- es v.: N
cl cm cl A -1 cm cs q N CD -1 uloq -A .0 er pon
gq 't qal ul qq qq q0,-pcsmam er un C4 Co
0?ol ac! ei 41 m cq.Avcc
4-1 M r4 N 1-1
cs c) r- r- N CD aD co cc
un
V 8 N -"
v. N cIR"l ul qg-Imen
0:! qqqgq
N
0;oq .1! c?en
20 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
c) v v un
• 0 00 •0
000000
! c!0000
Ci "1 cg U?C, 7-0 CD CV 1.0 CO
ea
CV 04
't d 4; t": '1csaclo4Nu7g.
et VD 00 Cr 41: '1:on mn r-: CV Ill CV
1-004r0
47 41 1.0 1.11.0 1.0 04
'4? 1
eq aq cr?u? a?clcr, • —
,-IMMCDOteun ei ”4 c4 ci ,4
qqqqCga:i. ee CO 115 CD 05 (Ti9•i lei
P L,9288N§
0
4
O
0
4R .13: C:? CR '2:.neR2-4.
eR •1 cl cr.i
C
ce
0.•tt
41 C?0 co - MMQ
CNONN
47 mr N ...Iei .om LLj N c4
.1! mr ul uRN cn en '• 'Lien
r- el mr eq mr.4 CV e4 en eq mr on
1-1
°R C?CI aq0 taD 00 140 1.4
VD
yw Cq VD t-t-
"t rl CC' CINee
1 C1 .1 CV cc!
Aga;
LID
di00mic.52,
Cr)
"I! cqR
P-D
V] v1 CV 4]0 CD C4 ee t- CO
i.. 05 OD C) CV OD 01 C4.4cit-ZrZoipt.-: .4
X. CV .-4
co, 0-1 000) 0 0) 0
L.k'4
lt CV V5 CV N re V5 re06 " eli od e4 ' .4
003Cl Ch 1-4
12,'"- 1-4
Ri0 0000
G60
CI] Cl 1.11-1 4.0
Cq
0
q
Oz
A
g al vc1
oR ',4! 0 Ch 07• N 04 c4
oqicl qc!"
12R@8 giS
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 21
•-Q
s,
asas 6411S
qD••••
th)4.1t:3
co 1:31:3 4)
IVc4
coco 0CU
1Z, ry
to3s.C31:1Aco 'I!
ro)2co 0
o k3z
O.
Ct
L.4J
011
C0
^0
C
to
e-t-ch
Cs
Clrn4-1
0
- . 0-Zf:,1-2
-60
6
az
15.
el
P-1
cd
z
Ck.
0
.11.41
N C 4 OD N 0 eln 01. 01 .
-4
-tr Cq
I I .1 I
CD t-- 6 C. 00P? 8 C] C77 CD CD
DocO N
og O NV . El !2OP
S. CD DoN "11.' 0 Ca 001 01 • Ncv66
ci
0.1 0/ kr3!?, Fs; g N g& 1'7 I-1CD
. 01•
4 co N 0 0 c0 CC N CC 01 07 11.30. 0? "1 Cl " el '1 '1 '1
ri) CP
CC CD CrCu? I I
CDz Q
2 OP oP O)N co [CN,--1 rt u7r-1 4-1 4-1 1..q",' 1 I CI' '1 "1 "'CN
G c-C' • R • I IN
CD CD C- CD CO N co 1O LON qqqq ft u: ccpc?4-4
OP o7'c',1 72i 8 8 8 • • C1) 1-n
cCC=.. CO4 co N
C O7 cq Cl c NC7 eq d - _ ci6
CO Cl 0 Cl LO '0 CV U,'1 '7'
0 U 0 0 0 0 ID C7 c 0 0CC co Cl N 0 05 C•I•-1 4-1 1.-1
04 •cV4-1 pp
c01-.0000
CA 0q 0) 01 010 .1-1 0 1.0
2g.
OD 07 CV 07 L.-- yprl C7 CD CD c7
I I
07 -4. CT) 0 CD117 03 01. 0
03 CD 1C1 03 0 0)CV rl 6
1 1
NCrj CC `.c/. CO 8
oo 07 o giac00
I I
en Ln N tp 4 46C70C7gq
Cl 6 ci mr CO VV *1 cD. CD CD CD
N •,--1 COet) Nc••ti
CO 1-1 N N CDV1
400000,-. c.0 N
COCcC '-' CI 7? iq
N CC N N4CC CC mr NV4.0
CO CI) 01 Do—! qci ct c!
0 t— o co ccCO (1 O "1 C9
2C,1 N S
0) CV CD a) coN 0111 In o? 6 o
CC
Q toAg t" Cr c? Ci '1
07 CO CI) 0 t--4:! • C9 '1
co cc CO'cq cl crs Ca ri Ci
CI) 01 01 1I-3 01C7 CC Cl CD Ca Co CiN
•-• mr,cA07 —!rr
01 01 01 NN .-1 .-14-i 0,-7 •
5? t-419 2 8 2 gir.
0 Cl ti
CD N.Ci m.
4 CC on CO CC N
N 1-1 0 0 CO(11 L.- mi. C.4 -1
r..t g-1, ct;
CO CO cc N "d'. tO 0 04
01 0 CD 03t" gR cl C4 '-'
I I
6N00 o"1 rrOCC q
0 CD CD 00CZ, Ca CO 0,
CO 1-i N CC CC 0'11.' 0 1-I 0
0 N N Xi NCD GC? ".
c: <7 C7 CDM CO CI) Cq ki],4
CO
d.iC
4,0
C
C
8
22 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
I I I C4 C4
rq rA Si N 6C Si
133N
Co
N 0
g! CG
. ri CI L"-:Qw.
$. 72. g.°4c.1
co
1-*
gca 04.4 u
az c-ti/ N
C)
ra•th CD NEs:
• 1 1
Oi
2 Ito 3 1 2 2. 8 2
,ms s11
Co 14 7; Si Si F.
A
V tic
s..X23 NEE
PN
2CO N N N0
, r7 el ”1 C3 m .r 2 2g CID. ;;
g
1:10.4 113
Zol co
E Ie Co r- 21 'I. C4
OZ
z
P7
pppp
;T.mi. 4D CD gg m t- OD gp cq cq
't cR .cl
otnral
At•p +i rry
• . s , 40
o.)or r- „
ts4:1
Lrr4n1
S oD LID C4 CD. C4 r-4
'1 .0 Co ulco
S 2 2 8 2 8
1' CC gi
S .
t-: 4 S Si q 51 24 ,$),
gp gp cq r-rl gl Cl ”W
a. 2 zuz 0
.rs08eiv
;Li S S791
RSSELS S giS
3 o4J^
1.1%.E4.7498:74
Na5 V*T e4
00; CM 1.4 eR cR ,4
CD Ol CP2 ao ci ap qp m c- c9 t- q p 0 co 1-4 nte4 cl "1 -1 e4 -1 -" et? q -1 q oR q -1 -I
ONCDIOW NrWeNt- WW
-1 v? -1 q e4 -1 q -1 e;QQ O el
8N.- 23 23 23 n g 8 2 23 gB
Cl CD8 `5. 8,:91RR A`a cp
-1 q Q 0q -I
1.0 CD .1. PO CO 00CI* ..I 4.1 .1 005.
L3
N
I I • •
......Oa el on Tr 1.1 C4c; ”1 cR ci 04 C4 cc c. r.
CO cR c4 cR L•••••
E-1
a,
g S ......ci
ssEses162. 21 2B 23 1 2B 2B 2.1 2B 8 8 2B F.11
C4 t- C4 mp uz qp CO c- C4 m W gO 00 r. [7, CP....... 01 "1 .1 Cl qq
q C4 Z1 q q dN0 '1 "11.41.1,104
tO
CO. . .19 CON0
e!Eissaas nR8888 na8823§
owp oomvqqqq R q
MR 144AMe4 od co ' -4
ehmove4mmR 01-0 '001 e4 ^!
CO
lOoDcOW,-INM
T.Mr-7 qC1 C
07;'$A88 .8
anchicmt-m-4 .4
CO, -
N. Mt-C 6. ce4 ,1
5"4R8SFA
R
NI. CDc-
'41 qa1 .41:
RiT42:2222RN .4 .4 ' .4
RW74Z8
na$8RS
4? t-.N q NN
Co COwr on r-'1 u1 0? ,4 04
C4mf. Orla° 1•1!"
oos2
4C
2
A
721
oS
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 23
24 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
4
2
at tl qq 'tl qN N aD cc 00 CO
tc!in
coUD t- CV t- CO 47 47 47 01 et et et
. ei et; O Co CV N Co CO N et, co r4
'1 cR w7.1 "0. 1:: Rig• 1=4 N • N N • N rd
eiD 4, co er 01 et aq 4,CO 4 4 m 4 Cv r4
Nt-: tl *. ccq uI Qt! °I
. CO m ca ea co . CO7 4 4.4 CV 4C7 N0'7er N RAOS4M8Co ”4
O "".LOODNW04c4.-401 et C4 IC a7 CD. o] et •TiM 04 07 04 01 04 itr5 ;V. . . . . .
1.0,-107N001.0 r4
COOOZS2 CO 274 A ,7.1 2 2 2 2op
014-1cDo10NMee4c0,-I
tiof
.tb11 Cc N (110.V.Mt- W001,17Mee00cl '1 .11: rl CI 'I.4
3
°el C7 CO 41 41 CD 010 ee OD C4
.-1C0GC c4. CO C4
qqqa1 .11..1N C) C) C) Ul -.0 el 111 • CO 11) NV ri el 1.1
cp vr cp u7 t- C4 1-1 mr cm
COr."cc —! 07 Ca "°. CI CD OD Cy 1-1 0)N cfs rI -1 040Wit0C0
ji cn, C) ee OD co er C4 C4 0 CO NN
• —tocq
to,„
no
13
4
J6
4
5
a Z 07 CD
to44 0 cri;T•p
0'10? 414. 4. 07If CO • Vt
qu:I cel otIN —! qct747 47 de ep
et CV CO CO47 • er es. es.
CG O)• N CO • 1.0 CO
qqm: q.0. 0t1N CO et. Co er
'0. t7 01 q07,-PC4NNM
cc 0 0 c7. 6 Nep C4 aD c:D . 07 er
w6" a.
-4
8,P24288 e4 ”4
rI
• e•
13
11--m
1LA .4.-ICO .VOI MOD.-1000M COC4C.4,-100047 • ut mr c4 c4 ei ei 04 e4 c.4 04 ei
q 04 cl -1 't c? CC CC CC q CI GC CI 2`1 't t":00 eq CO CO N 4•op CO op pp op ca op rl co u7 cAD er
CO CO 07 cc 0 oD tri CC qq.1 .1.0) C4
5888 4
8 gt 2 2 A 74. . . .
2 4 4 74 2
N OD 00 et. .--ICl . rl el pl
23 28 Z; !!?.
-I'C co r- cy co mwomow
Lc44 et et el cc! el el qqQ! C?R'-:
22R88 1•., § '4283FA V-988R ,3§ 5' 14188E1A '--si g 2351iv
^ 0 a)
'43 rsfa beg
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 25
cu 5? V7 C700 . ui 1.0
O '6! CV =E1
mr L., 1.4228 –I C) 00
r- t- 04 07C) c7 ”o
N qp CO cc 0,1 r-q c? 0. -1
Co 4.111 .-1 7 'Id, 14 .-1
tat, cguo mr
V7 it 00 C7
q '41$fi$
Po
rt
••
2
0P,
CL
.t6
1g.
co
'41 cqCo co co
mr mr 4a co couo mr mr cy co ,4 cy
!..'; :96 . .gz;
co c4 c4
CD. UD WI co CC 01 N
CO 07 07
M. CD. U7. 01 CO. CCCO 07 07 4. CO
to eg couo mi c4 .
cul t;
w cq t--•mr c6 c4 07
co. cm c-.
'a? cri tw.04 4i N cq
mr cc? 'I:cv C4 C4 41 C4
0! 0? a?co CO ci CO cq eq
COc.
Mr 1-I ,A cp t-44?-18S o?u?if?N c‘i CC Ncr7 cq 04
00 • rw cD 23$.1 ci F- N op
cg pi ' Pi e4 0i Di
Aric.118 "2.2884 i7.11N CO C4 04 -4 c4 CO c4'
...... F.' TVAco e4 c4 c4
El
gg . V)M .V. 24$1
t-•;°' F- 88 ca-4 8 ti7. C,
r-
jg
Q
07
47 CD • 117cl c:? IS
'R -1 ??. P.1! CV r-r t- 01
u3 mi Co N •C4Co
et CO01 CAN Clt cc en co mrmr PO OR UR 0R OR Sr. CIR 0i
w4
8 8882• •
A .k4
%5'
! -1 cg cR 71CO cv
,-1 01t-"1
•cl
."1 c-. co. cg
• 0- ciD 07
'1 t': "*. MI
uo uR r.-. IA ca no
CO 01 CI pi VI CV
8IRI27-, 8g1t.$:;2.1• •of
; 7-1 A f.2. ;5 2 8 F.'t 55LT:i
• v7 CO7 . . CO 'sr V7 Co . . .-0 .. .I cy 00 4.00M
1
110 c0 0- CD t- 6 gp 1.0 cc 0
1.0 . 01 0... 41 01 UR 41 •zi ...I 00
12.R88c9804 00
Fr.R88FA 1.-9882FA '.28@RFA t3:
:=
cv 07 07 U1 01 C. 41 rl mr 4.4C4 C4 41 N -4 wo eg C4
uo ag 07 .4. t- t- CC7 C4 07 qp
CA 07 CV 0el . e4
CV CV NQ N N Cif 0
CY] ce eq °I en c?CO CO co
07 07 0 0tq l11 Cq.1 .-!
ar u3CON0 0 CO V 'Vel go r- -1 eR eR
.14 CO e4
0 16 N
82 0,mcoc; co.4 gi 4
CV 07 0- C-
. -1..1 0 0! tF '' CC N CO
.0. 010000
C3
- E 4
'fa4:3 COCONt--0D? QC ": qq
•100cm "-4 Cl
C•111. CD "
26 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
04
r-u"
osos
Oz
u7 CDC ep c-eo 4 VP
C- •r ODLC? W. CD.
0 0 el. N 0 C-•O, 0. .
tiOf
828;4280
naasas,411S.
4:3)
0 CV r-4 CO C- er 0 07
eR ei eR eR eR4 co 4 CV H CV N 07 mr *-1
CO743 ! ;1 ;1 !I 3:4 s 6.
CM
AASE22cci rz 4 ID ui 1D
i228A2Z 2.1882P 8Mel6 36 g6 4 ' co 36 r: rz "
284P868 29.3882
CV •-n CV 9-i v-I
C ,T-144 4888 [...--9J8A8c4 e4 ' ' • e4 e4 -4 '
IF,R84,t;2• ccico.-p cooNN'v. 01 9 Es:ro P, 04 1-A
ooto CO CO• co qa en!cro r4
2 ',la g 8888 282E881.1
8
A
L--
6
0
A4
la
ra,
1i 4
A
1%s
-? re,p
c!
`r9gP:e.A-4
M2?-9ZA
A28 g l'Aci 04
, g A882,4 -4 aD
CO C".• C-
(C:CO N CO
ar- 0 CD go ,cm. r: aR g
CO CO 1-i07 0
CJ
flz
A
z
0
as
r2s.
Cn
en
a
A
PQ
.0 .4al 0
OS t„,-51
NE'
0 C- 00
co tri
14 Z822 88r--cd82'4'28286.4
. g vic."co e4 r4
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 27
1
tt
q
i.
•
!4]
L
L
4'42
o
•
•,4; c4C3 2
d t3q
P-t2-0
tl• ••4en -44
c.)-0C
Q. °. QC.
C.) LC
Pf2
4-1
N[—CI)
CCN
4-1
Y.
C]el?
n—n6-1
z
0
V
CI]
baC
›,C1-0
CC
qC
0,
C'; Tr 0 in Nco co in CD d d •
o0 oCO • • CC • L
CV C=• •n=:•
. • 6 -1.. co
CP. 0 .1. -4, 'Vco ei e4 4
t-^0 0 .4. en en CCCV r-1 co ca Co c4 c6
ti
CC• krD ^'• LC C •4
G I-I COCV CV
C 4 CO Tr Tr GO LC6 us cri c.; CV CV CV
R. Z oq cn cq NO CV CV CV • CV
-0 3EN
Lz. c?41 N. -tCO CV CO CO C1 CV CO
Q N i-r? 07 q0•
N Le7 CD CDco co co cP co
Tt' Or) •".•
40 • N CO
co co. CO oq ,f•f co 4 06 co c6
co co co cq• e3 CC' CO CO CV
01 ta co cocsa CV CO
0 07 017
Di Di cc •-L C 0 C8PCO N CO
oq o; co co oqCV CV CV
'T -1 'TCV CU CV CV CO CO
CV Cl CV Lin c^ elco co co co 00 CO
CO -4. CO CO CO CV
Le? c? 0 e?CO CO -4, 1 CO
on co co, co r- up.C.1 CC CV CO CO CO
W q? cq QP.CV CV CV C-.1 Cl
I I
-1 co d N,. 4-1
ci co oo uot`i
OdP•14
-s! N a?CV CV Cl CV DI- CV
CV e1 "1: coCV e4cocoetcy
'01 N,0P N. N el e4
o u'?N CV CV CV CV CV CV
cc: 1-0 W Lt7. .
oq uo ca C7 on-4 e4 e4
41 c? r: q? (". 00. °I
•f. ea cn 4 CD oq uo
CD 0
01 '14. co 0qCV • CV CV CV CV
'T u? ul 14? N. c?CV
a)b• CCC N CVCV CV CV C-.1 CV CU
a? M. If?,A qn- ,1
co. CC:
u? '4? 0? Co 4" q0.
q? N q? CD u?
I
•
CV CO N LO CC 0
•
o
• P.4q
z
z..d
0?01 '04. 40 mC'] . 4 •r
Q) 0 -1 kr? m -" elen VD Lt7 lf7 Lio 110
0. °P. 0. 0. el u?co ,f co
e0. 40. 01 a? N Nd• 0'4 d Vf. Tr
c? c? cri 41 e? qPcoci et co co o.5
C7 e.t7 u1 ,1 C7A CVd • d'C kf7
a?.Cr. C:. 7'CV CV CV C4 e4
CV 0? 0? c1 c1 O "RCO CV CV CV Cl Rl • n
a7Le7c4 CV ,4
00. N a? 0? 0q•—V CV
ti
z cq "0: 7? 4-CC LO .1^
0. a? a? °RCV CV C4
a7 al a? 'T qRe9 CV -4. CO CO CO
C7 U7 01 co voCVNCVCVCVCV
el r- co en oq onCV e P-4 15
C.]Cra•n• 4-4
ti cq on co el vo el elCO m m r.
co cq co CC,4 m r,
t- en C7 Nr. C'•p, -
oq oq 4 vo
:74 ."'S
F.111
Lin C70000CC Cn C4
U700000•—i m CD Ce5 CV 41
w-4
G7 U7 C7 C7 CD CDCo Up Cr) e4 U7
A 0 0 CO 0 0CO Cn CV VD
1-13A
te) -
4,E
"4
'.212,4-J 1-4 CCA . E"ri
aTa'
2
z0
COL-Co
ao
bb
5
0
0,as2
e.)
'f?
C)c4 c4
N
CA NI:CV . N
t'7'P C7 C4 .1 C10,C9NNNNC4
5
Cn Cr CI V.CqCo
rnh 0,. -4 -4 e4
c9R 0: 01C4 C4 0, C4 • C4
‘2• 0; CCco Co
ConCV CG
MP. C.". '1 CD. t7cq
-lheocq v po
• N N • N N
CON e": 00 COC4 N N CV c4 CV
Ch Co Ch Ch t-
zca,
L3
Dr4
U
I
u7 CI Ch C4
1 • 05 Co c4 co cq
u; cl
N C4 oi 04 ci
Cl)Co
C-
rn
°1 .1 ./.. C! C e• CO In4 CV r-r4 N • CI c4 N e4
•NN q m 00 q
N • , C4 . 110 4 Co Co
cn
01 'o! t": Co CC CO Qi F-1 "t. CoC4 et C4 • CO t- 117 e+7 •
s",1.)RS@F.,.§
5
X
6:3
2 8 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
4nI
0
4c
0
a %
1
0
uo cpom. -4 . N c4
'1! 0? oR q01
rl cl so CI et ulC4 N ...I .1.-1
LI q
-4 -4
-1 co r- u7 r- CCci -4 -• r4 9.4
0. M q kr? 1-r7
d:C•)un: CD
4a c0 t7 01 °1
A
p
x N
5
N C4 cn oo uo
c-co ..oquom-4 -4 c4 CV ,4
qcouo .o. uomcq e4 -4 ,4 -4
C^CCoOO
RR
4!011
nR8RES1.0 1.0
2
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 29
4!:1 CqI •er .er
e4 LE-4 01 00ea ei "r "r 00 't el-4 ea' -4 ei ea
d 0tC001 Nea CV 07 mt. CV CV
CP II CI C4 CRrA ti 4-1 07 N mr
CrirA
14r4 CV
01 -+47 mi.
47 eg VD e- 07 ul 47 NI: V7 t.7 .71 C7 q O 00N07070 'T 00 t": VI Cr!ei ei C4 CI CI rl CV CI N N 04 C4 d. C4 CV VD V7 tr mr mr vs C- 07 U7 07 07
ce 0D ati tit- 4;-4 -4 Ci CV ea C4
400 4:: 0700N N eg
IR °1 CO WR IR
rl /r4 1.0
5' L4), gg gg gg gi ggrn 7-1
m”0 C4 eg eV 07 CV
coe-rx mr N a c4 ao ”a
es cc cc mr cc 4 44g
07N Cl VS *1 t.7 VS US cc 14 Crl t: 41 Cl 4C4 C4 07 07 C4 • ca cs mr ca ca 07 07 CO 07 07 07 07
-1 el 01 41 01 01 vl!C4 C4 C4 C4 CV CV C4
bi
C.4 {:13 CD ec4 ,4 e4 vs
01 01 -1 01 01 0. '1,--1 c* cp IP
CR '1 CI Ci 41 011 1.0 1.0 r4 CV mr 07
Crl CI CD. CV 01 CS 07 CS CS mt CS t...; mr ul ../: m: el eleg 04 07 07 07 07
01 01 01 "1 01 L'":
C4 07 CO 07 C4 07
-1 dq IC; N01 V?
07 er NI. er 07 07 07
e1 0 N F-7 al C!ei 07 CV CV eg cc cc4c4
cdJ 04dlm N v; -1 .; t7
CV C4 eg CV C4 c7NC0N NN
.16
ad ,4 C4 07 07 04 07 mr mr
c0 ti cc! cp q qmr mr mr mr mr mr
.4
-1 ci ezi m c4 a -1 q mr. us, mr tC kN gR 41 gRN CO P-I 1-1 ,-I 1-1 • N .-n ,-I 7-1N mr mr N 07 07 07 07
Cp CD CA ,--I cm 07..4 ..4
m m CO K] CI] Cl!
• 1-1 4-I Ca CO v-,
rl Ul Cl CI
0000 N07 CO
0". q q 01 00 C-....4 rA rA . d .--1 rA rA rA z 00 0707 CC N.4
CS el.. 01 47. CV. VI CO CV .--. ,--. et ..4..4 ,-4 1.4 -4
1.4 C4 VD CD 07 117 VDvi m vi -4
Cl 41 CI 'T .1! 41 CR '1 CI e7 '1 'T
t71
'0: '0'. '0! 47 '4! 10
gg gg gg gg gi gg gg gg gi 7..: S' 2 8 88881 •1 1 •1
07 U
r2S
0 0 in0..0 -ci ,„'w .g
c.)
a
Ng-c,...... 2
q cc!eg V7 07 07 07
Cl CI Cl '1 IR CImr mr mr mr os vs
Cl 04. CS 0C4 CI CV 01
C4 C! O. 0- VDc4 vs ea es ei r4
F" 0': r": 01 vl 01N N
0,-1 01 01 01 01•.0 1.•1 C4 us mr
ei el a mr L..-; CRVD VD QD u7 u7 et .
01 0! clNN 07 07 07 07
cl "0! ml 0) '007 07 07 07 07 C4
07 7. mr ”a 000m CO CO CO
'0. cc!cc:
9 •I
5'
30 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
X
cvXNNOO c',Lit' s4RARA
a; m N no toco ai co QDN r0 1.0 r4
CD O N cc CD cor- cri oo co
r4 rrl C4 4-1
NA
CO 01n..,. S
ON COOp 40 OD Ch C0C.4 C4
CSz m! c1 01 CD ao ta co cn coA '
cn no el CD ”1 1-1 st 01 U1 +.1:
474'07Di col t;
co
zrA At CD 0I t- UP
6 44874.-7M
!."; 424`44 --'4447;4 4474442
CZ g rZ 4 c6r4 rA rA
cor-qr-uotoov6m4r-Zuo
rA v4 Ci rA rr
`14c.J 0
11ruti41t .4
0
44z0
Bc002
..rhooric6
C4
.5Q
„ 'T c? cl v. c?WC011.50r4 1.0 pr.
-1a• cn oooo go1.4
uo N cR c7 oocnamr-3uD
X
U2q ix/A'
qq.l cR q
mamr-uo.1,d,
CI U1 cn to c4 cn oom 4 A r— '”
i g
cut
W
as
ul 01Ch 00 00 +0N N C4
Cqr-. a! g0010c01-1W
01 0! 0? ici 01 v4 CA vA NC CV C..C: 16CZ CZ 06,4v4 v4 v4 vA C4
4 4CO OR CO CO 00 -1 c!
2 g3; 2 m AA8ALG cR Co cl c4 co Cp 01
N'r 49 g3 gi
zCO z
CO 01 yl mr u1'AR Anfir44
'1 '3• oq cc! -1OD • t- +W
e4 en oRC. C NN
O00 47 CAN
. 07 uP ma
' .N ."! mt CrR E":N vA
,ts 6 52iRc`BRAS 2288AS 2R8RE§vnI 4nI
StvGO U
1 .11
CO7.n1
d 07
N
Cq IIICqrA OD +1. 07 C-rA r4 rA v4 v4
Ci "1 t": cI 't cq• t- QD st CD 07 Ir..
0? R ci cn cn qNI. WMONW
1-1 4-t 1-• 1-1
7.1 -
ul "t cn u7 ul t7uo cn oo oo cn co
cl°1 00? c9Nomuo,-km
ul'gt-: c9r- r- M OD UPr.
I •
Cl cquR cl al00 CD N rd Ot oo
W 4.0 v4
C) Cl "t CI URCV C4 u7 C* OD .0.
cn c? r": -1 c7 c,▪ co co uo ac o6
▪ oR co.0 CC •-n Ch CCgnI
Ad
Plo7 co q go co q
OC cm uo oo co co N
oR Tr co oR rl coco o6 r- to no uo co
C4 -1 CR mi! Cl LPO lc7 C4 07 VD Ch C0
t4 01'.R qc1MONC0CO34M1-1 rr 7-4
Cq OR CR 01 NCO C0 OR NN C4 C,CD co r- Co ui co • rz of G7 cc;
C
CII
C
a
C
C.
0/ UR Ch 00.tocococcia a1.0 1.0 rrt
cc! c?'-! mtCOr- co co uoN C7'11 00400W
4
01 CC! CR 0 t: kg CR Cl Cl 4-1 CV C4 01 4-1A t0--q. [... O.:704710
cqqC/?°1 C"I'qq:1N no r- oo CA oo r- 't H g? CI CI V.
000700t- C
u7 O Cq CA '1 cgc•cl qc4 L7011.7 .1: CqC1 Cn e, ci“qa? qCIRn, r4 rA CM 1C7 Crw4
N- CD- TA t-00 CV Cb +01 t- -a.4n1
CaCIOC,M r. CZv•
.01-.00Mrr rA rr rr
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 31
m Cy LqCo 0t1
-
t".tCj N C) Co 00 •
dtC
.4
rtiCV
QleargCXto c?N mer er 2
Co cdoN La on
alCD ID CD C)
Co ,r r- ,f
't CO. CR OR c7 Crl "107 MD tN Cb CD C7 CD
1-1
CO CO CD o? to. cc.07 u7 r- co 01 4) cb-
cl tV cgC7 uR c• lc!V7 CO VD 47 47 00 07
rd 4n4 1--1 7-4
Cl -1 U;VD 07 Cb C] CV 47
1-1
07 er C-un -4 ,rC)
1-1 1-1
01 cl cl47 cv un CV 0o ua
11? 14 cdc cdo? CD LLCo GD N CV C-
CV
a? °R
CONC)
es 1
oo c? cc!g? t". cq
N: CI cc7 mrl:' Co 00 • CO CV
CONCV 00 •
CD .1 kg VD47 Cb C7 CV
r-I N
.1C et .1 CD CD47 CD 1-4 Cro .4 C.-
1-1
0 Co 01. 0 0 0v-I 4-I 1-4
cn co. en. ea, cd,tOCCI0,-IMO
cp.: c7 coCo GNI Co C5 Co N
4-4
a? Cr?
CL
oS
gc.d
N Co in
1
. CV Co.-- I ,4 C4 r- 07 rA ,4 4-1
I I I I
CO N Co N 00 N
°R 'dr? q?' Co 07 Cb CV CD
.t
CV 41 47 r1CD O C7 CO CO
CV•qt,
,c? N C) C)Cs) op en p p
q el N 't '1 OR45 uo c7 r- C7 CO
oR Q C') a? la t":CO)C c0 Cr) CCm
Q.14 0 m
ooN t- CO
•,1 ti .1.-n •n••
Co La 0 COCo ui0D
en e7 cv ch t-o.; an r- P4 I I
0. cc. ol uo.
z
0
z• mi.
Ert•-n
C
4.0 4-4
PO 4
P4crl 0; 0R ogQ7 40 'Tr oo ,f 00
0.,W. '41' Cc
Nr Co Co CoM C2 C"..?Co N 0 Co Co
IQ I I CO
Co
07 -cr., 4D N Oier. cR Lc? LIR t", CR '1 t7 CC d '1 "$: o e. Cr4 Gq
d N CV • cv co eg • CO ul 47 N Co • Cr) N 07 Co 47 Co CO 471-1 I-I 1.-r C) 1
C) Cq C‘I COILO LC7 N Irj00
CDuaC4 et VD 47
07, -4
Co07 et et
o? ca. .1, ,r47 U7 47 mr
co an iq en an 71mr 07 47 CV 07
CO CD CD 47. CD a) ol Ill N aR q 'Ct CD 01 et 01 'I Cr? eC! eC! ee: "11 4qen , me co mt CV CD • ,r • coco eV C0V d
NCD d'd'b Ce7 CO msr CO. 'SD .1. 10 LO D3 CV
co uo. co. 1..".Co C7) CD .3.
c. el 01 oa -1 e92
CO °CI '4).C4 , CD C7
CV r.1
CO eredr; C 06Co C4 1•1
and wood;VD VD 00 CC e • et t-
If? N., CD LC?N N CDC
•C
o)od ryCoURQ7 r- u7 0- ,r CO
C[] °R Co -1 •
Oi
O•-n N O
•-n 1-• .4..... N d ea oa oa an NCOUJCOCDN
0000 C7 C7CC. 07 CV If .w
5? L-9 R g gignI
g3g gi 53 L-9 g3 23 gi 53 5? gi gi gitan u.) v,2 gg321-1 4-1 1•C,
CI) "CS
P7 C7
8
re3.m...... OD
COea cc
CR m •. COQ▪ cq e t-
c?N
Nr. COC4 VD1-1 4-4
CO CA
er)cei
N
LeiCO
eaN
-14COcq
32 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
C.1 "r. cr4NCO 4D ciD
N
C- 00 ID t- ,407 In 06 04 CDC4 OD N
CD GO Co co op 00
CO Mt IN..4 1.0 46 C4 C41,1
In N NI;• co co co
CO 01 '4: elC4 C4 47 CO
Crl '1! 41 CIOD CD CA In-- N
Cq "1
rA
t- CO oD▪ cc;
oP oo
CO ceio6N co
on on1 1..1Cl cri
CV oq CO
cn (.; uRN N N N
el! UR el.eP ID VD
1,-.9R8RES1-4
'0: cl '1 q CIO
44
4.
L
K
ti
tJCccc
r.
0.)
aCp
-.4
TAC
G0;
▪ cR (In ooGO CO C4 sr
COCO
on cnCO CD4-1 1-1
C000000007NVCZ .• 1.1
tc! le? '"! t". Co e; m ol ol uo t7'Is P7 C4 C7
4-1 cm 1-11-1 1-1 C4 7-4
c:N '1ClcV000 0010 CD eP re 47 eP 47
44A un un on en un on unta w CDun ci ,A
ODc„, bi CC! 4:: V: CP CC! cr?
04 c--1 01 0.1 01 1-1 CA14 CO .nn
tzl I 00 CI N Cl COCm 15 1-z
1 4.4 07 01 N CO Cl
00 LI I q; Li? 0? "I
en on oo VD 47 1.0^^ v! ID CO IA N
•I4 CO eion g CD CD
.2Et 8
;.8
,
4.1Az E.! 1-1 CA OR OR mt N
"41:d ai06ti 00 Ngt.,
Q
2
en un un un ze! ei0, cm on r— en GO ee
44111
2
c.e °C, N csi..er en Lin
CO -,may 47-
Cr cl ul 0? °q !."4 417Q,,ICOCOLOL:3 04 1-1
ZO' ZiN q "1 44 CI LEI ep +44! 07 LC] C/0 N C GO OD O..
'41CO -44 un un en
VD CD 4.0 C4 O. 47 ,v,-e
aton . Go -ercq
*7:11 00 Ul In't Ch CD 00. 1 co co en ua O N .44. O CI er
CO
CI,
"V3r.-03
O'I! *1 0? ti '43 CO
un un 40 47 47
N
0C6 CO
CO IL) tow N”4
7.4
0
0 e,! CD. C0 en41 CO ID Ls. GO caD
aP CD 0 CD 0 CD,A 01 AD CA CO 011,n1
m pg
0s, u; N cri. es] ci ou 00 00
47 CD CD CD CD,A 01 4D CO CI oP,
0 co11 0as
g -7;o
0 big
Ng.4 SE1tr.: co
t6
-10 00 00
Cl 00C C47 41r- e49 cr
°q '1 't 11J q.r ea en .0 CA
04-2
r-,cb C4
4-4
o?.14 co cq cm Mr 01 CqCO 4.0 ooe-rn
41 - 4-1
40 .4! el NI: o0 q "1
00
IL)
ti
C.7r-4
Le?ID
ORIC
O
elen en07 U7 Tr
'T Cp 'Aco en in
.. CCoo co
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 33
'T 0? '1 2 1-0. elN on co cn o
▪ N op op op• N eq ot
NJC N N op cp up op 0, cn u7 00 dC') N CD CO VD En CO C') IC) N 47 41 00
Cl N Cl C4• C4 0D Tr VD C+ OD
cp up cl op up CO r.- CD CON .. 1 • Ti u5 u5 r4 r4
• CO el 0? el el el 2 el elC4 07 -I• un cfn on Ne ,r 47 47 VD CO
Cr]N CAR up upIn kin ue N on
E.'I:4W ' . I 1
0.1
V 00.. cl, C! el CD 'TGC .-4 co N CO to N N
...
CI V:N • 1.-.1 Ch 03 4.-4C7
4-4 1.--1
• el el 'T cl el el •' el CO• Ch CD Ch 03 00 41 OD0 cn OD
.--1 v-I
et? 2 el 'D Cr'CO CO C73 CI6 CO
Lc;ogoo N coo N ccd coo
q C9C; UR Cl41 Tr N VD 47 VD VD
CD 47 CD CD C3 CD" 4.4 01 UP Cr) CI ki/
4.4
CO
0.
ica
NN
N
6
z
0.
ti)
afi
C.
N -1 ele N oo cn cn
ti CA
1.0 N u5
m e7. MLo
110 CI 11/ el cl r cnCD d 00 1.0 e5 LC
T.
cn el co CC COun r- 47 %V CP
N
oo N cp up on
Ch Ch Ch on CO• . .• un co cn VD VD
11-J ClN • • Cr;
ACA up cr)4. C41 N ti .4 Cr).4 .1 .4 •4
CO 00. el el ("--.C9 co co
T. TA
C7 CV Cl 4; "1 CI• N O N Cj N
N CDCA CD L:h
N
LC .4 Tr N 03 07 . .47 VD CC VD N Ch
CR. CO 11/ CO T1CO 00 0 • Cr3
N00 00 C.^ to
CD cl up Nr! upHop c-op cnc.
NCC7' CDG
CO CO t-- 07 .-1IT1
tcp r"! el elCI M +17 CD
0? '14. q el0 0
CO CA unon• N VD 01
4-4N C7 t-. to t--
1-4 .. cc u7 CVCO Tr VD Ch
2•0C.
0.
T. TA;74
z N cn
a 6-4 6 N
'JRco
C7 Crp ce.. en in W(C-41 un ) ci
2 ENcn .4 cq op C (D.N un cc 47 V.
2 °Ron aD tn crn N
op cp cp•ep opCDNr[Curren
2Cl Tr C4N , nZr Tr CO
Gr
0 Tr. CO 0 V]u7 N ,to CD u7
cqN C) O •
n*: C4 VD 47CC un N od
CC: CP; '1 iq Cnoo c.ro C7 Lo
q ci?CD VD VD
CO up cp CO <7OD CD N N
ci? op cp upby • 00 N 47 VD
C4 CD. 07 Tr, Tr.N C. T. N on
C..CI) Cp CD 4. 01
CA
q Lc? ',1•. to.o0 .1, in cO
N CR"Kr , VD
-erco • cl oi ui cgi
CD 41 CD CD 0 CD CD U3 CD C7 CD CD 0 47 O cn CD 0 CD00 VD 03 C4 47 07 VD Ch el 47 07 VD Ch C4 41
5 "5 z4. .4 • 4 .4 .4 4.0
up 41
•-•
•••Ari?1
ai
D0/3
8
cc
-!
q7 N:NCO
ol co up unC7
op cp opcn N cn CD
• U; CC lq C; '101 00 CD 00 00 Cr) %1.
• e7 el (4700 C') 1--F 4-4 r. N
on Nr IN CO 0▪ -,d; c6 4
gsaca tc?,.4 .4
34 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
20z
tl
0
1.401 01 md: 41
1 t.m. 1 up t- OD
4.3
CC
.4
a,
c?11 1 r.mq ••n ca —1 co co
oq 0. '0.. N N . •
ca. 01 VD UD d•N I-1 Cd
Op
UD Cl ml w co..
CD
.13
tZOD 00 OD CN
CI mi. CD CA
mo_ s, L cq 7:1 '4!
cot-er.
cD Q107 Ot .0 OD
as °1 ° 01 d' 't 01 -1 cq0R
w 00
mq m• oa ua ua
ol N r4 4D OD
0co , , 1 1 . d ma co /r mr r- mr
yRy Cl mr ua ui ad
•OG VD UD cc co ca
P-g
GV OD mr u3 ya
u7.-1 -r N cR ole4 4 oa oa mo
Gcl
q
s..
s 2e0
CO
Cez
511
00 u7 CJ 'CI01 41 U) F.. 1.0
ii
C7 cc CC: lq GC VD r7 01] C3.,r co co 4 co •er 4D 42 mi. OD el; mr •*, co VD
cs.i z 8 1
°R ea 0p e t". 0700 OD CI 01 0-4. vs eri 1 1 ua mr mg mr ua . u6 ua ua r- oa
N.z•1.2
if A(a)
P.
.fs
LR C. °I qN CO CO C- N
W
t-
0
r4 er? N '2'. N.Cr?t-- • co
vnI
"esC:14
1 '1. 1 1 1
go t2ca
• ca N N Cl CDmM C- 4D Cmmm
Lo 7-! Cr) CO .4. OD CA C3 co ma ua cR"tmr 1 c4 o4 oeJ . -4 ri ”4 ua m4
Ch 41' CI as v-I N tq CV CI CI et et
CA CO t• 1.0 N MD co 47 t- Cr] 1.0 11.4
YH
r4+ CV CON tr:: CT!cc CO 00
CI 4D CI CI CI 1n1 q -1 cq 0";vnI cq 4, t. mq CA CA CV OD uD
4.0 gnI
z. et
,Ir! •r. to. q?,r ma ua ua /r•
1400m ^CI
e.L41c92RRS
,-4 800.
8 14c9 g3R88 t2iRSSRS4.0
u
126 o ogs ,g
q
;4thp a 3
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 35
12? N Lc? "1:.0 C4 C4 07 el. 47 C-
• °I C° °R-4 c4 pS uo CD CO CA
°R 01 0; -1 c5.or4
C; NV 07 07 u7.0 et I OD VD C- CD
al C;q "7 CC 't q °IP OD U7 CO OD 4D OD OD Cb co r- oo
Co el 01 402 0; c43 cl "1 Tt '1! N c1 01 t7Nc' Co 100 00 v. 1L7 ,• W CO el et. e 1 uo r- et LC
CR C° nt• CR '1: Cl t7 '1: UR 05 CR °I CR CR N -1N N . co .1, 4D ,0 CO c4 cd er co mr mr
CR °I °I Cl tl Cti q 'SR '1 Cq °0111 C5 47 47 etC4 C4 et et Tr tO rA et eD 07 07 10 47 ftr U7
°I t"- r7q 03 CI "1 UR °O. °I 01 UR CR34 C9 10 00 47 QD C4 .4. co mr et OD .0 C4 00 07 OD et
• c? "1 v. N 'I '19 "; c; 01 -1 N34 CO . 47 et c0 C4 Sr COCOn N CO cr) CO .r 43
•
5"2ASARS 2RASH 2RAARSr4 r4 rA
CG
"NF-
N"AA A
G.100 et
ay c.1 clCh
°0 C' co
CC °1N us co CO co
Cr? CC!N
CO 'a t:CV 07 C4 IC1.4 rA
CON
QD 05 C.:”4 rA .1.0040407N
f.q C.1CD 1 et 04 CA 1.4
111 47 t 00 V; Ch Ch00C-005etW00,0.0.04-FNC4,-P
,t .1 47 ClCD 05 C4 t-C4 .0 .0 .0
CI CI Cl al gC1• CO OD CO Cr] t+rA rA r4 rA
al Ca C1 C"...".1n1 ,14-1.4 .R. C4▪ rA 4.0 rA 1.4
• U°. UR °R CR q000003rA rA 1.4 4.4
co
-
• -•0 70
tit 0
NE4
z "t al alCOC9N
u7 N
AA
'1!ClV5 V- el. 00 0- t-
q q qq qN CO
III CI '1 "1et CID C4 C4 C. CD
rA 1.4 4.0 1.4tc!I::c4 C4 CI t- 00 et
rA
a3. N/: CI Ola "*.inIC910
'V q "V. cq 0?c6 r- OD cc; OD
't cR "1 0:2 0? c;00 C. -A cl CD CD
1.4 rA rAos
C] A CV GD 47 NNCI0C. M.00007rA
q 07 0:I cI el
A C-ri °2CO
't N cCOLOCOMCZO
rA
Ch Oh 07 Q7 .0 C7 07045 45 to C4
CsR
CI'. CI CV °°. Ca CIrA ro cD 05 C4
caR cl oq oR oR
CO t. t- C- CD C').0 .0
uo 07 C5 C5 .01.4
I OD C4 QD OD GD- .1n1 rA 1.4 4.4 mr N U7 1.0 N N 9.4 mr uo
0
s.
IL1 °I N N '1 Ul C4 1:5 '1 t7et r- r- CA .0 03 CO t- I CO
'a al 'a CI Ca Tr. °I; "1 C°.U0 C. CD 00 C4 r4 cDCn .0 CD 0 c)
rA
CI CI -t q7,C4 07 et C407 OD
00 C4
C9 aq CI CI r4 Cn-4 cft m -A c4 t7
CI Gq .0 1100oo 6 *A 6 cb C-• as A CI Ol 't ILI °I CI q cn W0 °I °O.
CD et •07 et .s• 47 OD C4 OD 07 00 et1.4 rA N 4-4 N rA r4 rA
ey
mt LL7 c4 c; r- N oo cn NN q NNN:4 co od co rz N' ccremooceoilo40PR
rA r4
Oyl
Qi
C7Qi C9
36 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
n-gOu
"c3co
•0
tl
4Caioco
fl
ti.21:10
cis•ri
qIS LC1)
6"1/.5
tilt 4D
>
33.3=1
Ei
to elcf
•co
4.0t-en
2
06
z
z
•
02'1 01 cl eel ep CR cl QR C4 CV CR o00GO CV r0 Cp cft ch. • co tO try er; CC r- co . td c0 .
CR Cl CO 41 VI epti N • 1-1 OD CO te re Pe. r-
g•i
CD q CD 001 e0 0eR N 01 01 qe4 e1 NVD Vri t. tomoOm CC aot-comr- er)
Gil C1 CCI .t .7"C! -1 QT? N 111 Ce7 rl N CO re cl
CO °I CD CD ClCri CD CA CA CA CD op cm di co cm cm Cl
CDCl mo mo 0C 4D eP eP eP VDr4 re 1.0 1.4 rA .4
a• CN aac 't CR N N CC C7 tO cl egq N 01 e0.CI UR CI aR 't aROD OD eP 4.4 C+ QD CA 004DP-00 wr-r-counto C4 UD VD UP UP 4D
re 1..1 9.4gR CR 41 te: Cn re COC4 C4 in -4. 4 oo
CD LR clo oR cn. ed 4 on C4
NCR CI '1 °I CRer CD VD
gR 0! '4: '0. el? -1 01 g; 01 el •°: 0: -1 cR °R re VD Ce CD N VDCD m mo ao VP 4, CO OD VD MD VD eP 47 et, eP eP ”4 on 06 .4: 4
`1! q "0 47N ep 'CR°R aIR C/1^! CIR L". C1 .1 CI LC! en uR ao ao co 4 ci00 .cor-r-a re Ch CC ILD 4P OD CD VD to 4, 4 4 co er el. 4re
Od 0 er . OD • OD
C6z o CD 01 04. '0. '4: CO C7 4 NGVQ co co D av 4D 4 co oR m cotr
DO • r- co co cm r- C IP oo t- r- co rz Ad -4 :4 ci co co ci ci
CI CCPCI CI cl cR 4 co el 01 N c4 10 gv: c0.P.- 42 CON an co on uocor-comm e-cor-mr-t-
01 cR .. 4 4 ci a 4to 4 4 4D . 4 4 LO' eP
4 al ao 01 ao c-m .0 4 4
CR aR '1 NC 't4D VP UP 4D 4D
00 Cln CR 41 VD, el!a.] 4 4 4 on
CC CI '1 W. r".re eP .4 co el C4
el. 00 d07 uoci 06 4 4 on
gR r1 cR e4• co oo 4 on
te. Cn QR 00 Cn URCV CV CO CD OD OD
CC
03
0 eg CC 0 C' ei uR a co en 01 4 C.: CI "1 01 '4: el c4 el 'q '1 t7et • Pe OD OD 4P CC CC VD CC c. L.- up r- oo VD VD tC VP v4 op se er eP eP co 4 4 eP eP VD
•
el)oh)
L.
tl
.-t °R '1 Q e4 "1 -1 cR -1 cR °R Cqqp re ,4 CV CV C4 CO CA Fe OD CM CA OD
q q cri a 0O dcl? Co CR [0101NRWM4D4DOD VD UD VD VDre
't CI CR4D eP 4D 4D UD VD
°R qq0telup el. re re OD CPre
0R co co at m ao coCD VP V) ao on 4 co
co on an clo co co1-1 Mr VD oo 4 uo 4
an to uR co en co4 4 4 Lo 4 4
ao. mo co uR on r-14 Leo on 4 co on
C
•
0C7Nd C7 Ct? '01F. VD VD 41.' ILD • C') Cl OD el
°-. 0. eiR gR eci g?co BCD mo CC onCD Cln co Moo-4 co on 4 eh en CV
co o]01 co cc voed CV eV
343.4 R;LiR8888 2SSERRE 2888FiS 54'285RS t4'SS`ciS
Cr;
c8e.
0 r,0 o
as.c
r5beg
CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 37
41 C4 4.1 Ci cR '"J! oR 01 oR oR ul "1,4 C4 Ot CO 00 07 C4 117 07 C4 07 er
co cy ci 01 us cs cg 4 cis co cq-4 c4 co 4 4 co co Mu co cy co .4-1 4 co c- co as us cl e4 cs
NN C74 cd co ea co co co co
CD 011 r: oR u1 01 c? oR •oi cqg.v N 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
ic7cl o0 N'1 01co co co co co
CR'11 3R CI qt.7er CO er C) CO C4
oR e4 -1 -1 -1 : oR 01 e• *1•IC 4 .NNNN COa) NClCi Cl
NCCCC 01 01 C)N CC CR 01 01 N et N 4.0 07 4.0 C4 C4 C4
CD 1-4 00 CA N.. -4 VD •II! e7e)d C? 01. ,4 c4 c4 CV 7-1 CV CV CV
• CC co uo co CO on 4 co r-.4 .4 • e4 ea el -4 c4 -4 cq e4 c4
9:!-12 g EFA `,P.R8RRS"-"'
81
AdCC
610
44
a '1 q 't Cq•e voccgco
Ci CA.-1 ORv ao erD
Tr o7 en cl
• Tr en in Tr
r': q.V. W4 qqCO CO CO CO .Vn
07
0
0
CA• M cn'fI Cq 730ad p cra
V 10 V V 10 a) CO 0X
01 01 e4 q 7! • env vosv•-t •-p
R°7 01°I•11. 'V V 'V +0 , •I• 4 ao -4: 014 © ,4 •
oR cR el oR q 'o:00 0 00 1-1
e rl 4nI
Ci'l! mt qC1 C4N CO •0 0
cqeiN oR cPqX
C4 OD Tr CO • C4
el co ,r c.1 4 CD.CO COed ,c; 4 co 6C
F.
It; cl c4 -1 co.covv4cy
Ai°R oR cquR cl o.cq 05 .0 -0
7
•eP er CO N
N qq 'T C1u7 1.0 07 C4
'T eR cr? Na)C .IPM.Mr-d
09 CAC F- CO
MCOMNN44
:14R8 , § P;.9R8SF., § '4988RFA V-98Safi§
4.1la C4 C? CPI qR Cl Cri t7 c? oR -4! N et! 4. r..: e4 Cl CO
0 CD 07 C- en r- CCk 25 "4
CE1, C0 OD 0 . .rq t-• t.. OD OD OD 07
zi2 t3 'iv en oRe --4 oi ad to •
Dipq
. • Go
ze Z
CO el ess u3oo ,-1 r- w • •
co el tp co: co el 4dr- en v c* e-- no ca
. P.4
0lir 1!
:44...... CD C- 0D M. CO 4 4 ea co el
ON
CL CI c4 r4 OD 00 C4 ID 00
04t
T. CC et CC Cl Cq "1 tl (2 lq '1 C; C4N U700 C- CD er • OD er • It. • .4 4 el
Ch N tl C] m 0 Tr oo CO C) r7 O 410 c- qS 05 cod CD
1.0C4 07 07 •7 CV CV
02
CTi C7• CD 1
NLs. N-er
4.0 00 07 00 • •c? c4 cR °I "0 °1
er 07 e• CO mr
38 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
.11
z
0
ul CR oR• CV r- Cip 47 er
0 40. 0 '1u7 AD CD CG QD un
t7 el cq lq 4/ L-7co co co CD on co
C4 '1 '1
01 01NCO er -0 CA1.4
'IR CI141 t": cc! 11m u7 AP m0 CD CD
r-r.
*4 ,r C4 CD CD CA 07
41? oo.+cvco 0030020On
CO 'Cr .•pV 4.4 4.4
It1 ":r— t-
0 CC t-1.0
C i
Cs el u/ 4; cq Cgey Cp cl N OI epon co co cm 47 r- AD CA CA on co on r-
L- cV •l Cq '1 01 Mi! 01 .1!CV 0/ mr co oo gr co co .Tr
CI 01 e • et: e• ci cp cy up Qp co vo co07 ep u7 07 AD r- r- u: u7 QD 47 00
r.; co el 01 oo co 03 c3 CD •1 ,1 op07 cv ep 07 QD *+v C4 CV CV 07 0.
1n1 1n1
oo mr ri mrr4 06 •l cs5 co r- cv C4 a u] CA 4D
'1! ol '4/ 44
co co co co N•. co on -Tr
I
▪ 0/ 4? eq c? 01co co mr co uo
ol oo ml co co eler el. AD u7 4, er
ei Ci qcl?CD CO CO
CD 2
°
CV ml CD. Cip cl qeft cv 07 cv 01 C4
m • ho co co. 04 c4 e4 c4
co cl co cc! cor-• CV CV cv
Oz
0
0
U1414
0 .9
co co co co ol! c! co: co co cr!m on on on on t am ed c5 CD c5 CC CrapV 4.4 1.4
1.. CO (41 U1 07 CV atF.• .4 en CO 4P 47; cdp c6
LER o,agor-. 10eitt e0C0 .1. CD u7 07 07
01 Ap ”•1cc cc cci r- co on eg 40! 4g2:
.1• to
clp qp Cl Cl4, Cm 07 CG er cv cv
c q O.t— • t-
▪ cq 4?ul cq 4/ cel 4/ °I 1411 u/r- un an on . co oo CA ao er 07
r-; ci ci go ci mr cnCD 40 c4 ”w 4.4 0+ r- cra c4
01 v: 07 C:! 0: "1 C-1 4 Ul41'er co •7 1.4 ,4 Q7 '17 117 ,r e4
'1 "1 4/ 't el el
0 '1 q• ,• r4
94?ig2”...§ !-9RSEFAr.]
0
tri qaDuZoncCrer C4
gt q< Lk" toZ
I1
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 39
O.-1
0
cat
1-e
Prt
ci cI CIN cl^!co C4 C4 CI N CV
41
O ON oiN c4 •
N 41 Cl CO CN • CO C4 • Cq r0Ci It 41 41 It E.-1 C
1C4 C4 C4 C4 04 C4 07
0- 0- 0) .4, 03 el. 00cip c4 ci e4 ei ei
°4 u/ 41 41c, C4 N N N N
44 u-4, 07 CO C) 01
z qc1 047JRC4 00 07 07 CO 07
01 a4N n n
N c9 .1 01C4 rq
°o ua oq...•o•q.4 el r4 cv
C4 0d CI
mt L t CO
07 0
el 4aogCsN.4. co eq ea CV C4
41 It C1 Ciep C4 e4 C4 CV C4
Cl CD.41• C4 N CV C4 C4
C4 M7 CG 07• • MNNN
Ci 41 41 It07NMCVN
N 1 N CO
n n n ;1
01 CI C4 °: 0.! 0.4 p NN
71 c! cl er!
qqm ov
NH uI 01 cR 01N CV C4 C4 1,.4 0.4
41 41 41 41 41C4 C4 N *4 *4 ,4
C7 47 C4 07 c,NNed.4 r4C
ce. 4a P7 e; 011CONNNC4,-I
41 01 41 Ci 41 It
;1 n n :1
"1 41 41 4; 41 0/C4 C4 CV C4
Lc
Ci 04 '1 Ci It C1
0. el to el u; a;
el c/ It It u1 141 01
•
C1 ul It 011 c4 p4 1.4
01 41 et 41 41 41
al t.". "1q C: CONOIN C4
1.1
040 0:1 01 cl It cl q N
cq 't c7 q141
en .1 It dop ,t 47!
1-o.407,-1
.4 p .4
It It 41 41 41 It
r- ,t u7
04 C; 't (11N CO *4 9.4 *4
"1 07 It It cR
01 et 4'1 41 47! 01
41 01°10 41
q,1 0•1 0/ 11/ 04
IC co dc, ul It
CO 41 41 0 07 00 cI cc/ °I O 04 '1 01 It u/ 04 cl 't ul ONOen cr! 001 C..- CO COei CV 04 C4 N C4 N r4 e4 C4 CV 0; 1.0 04 1.0 1.4 C4 p4 .4 ei .4 .4
01 C4 pi 00 Cl CI 01 C4 Lt Cr! 0; •-1 Ci 01 '1 't cRcR cl 04 DI/00 00 00 ep 00 ep 01 1.4 1.0 9.4 1.0 1-1 1.4 04 04 pq N CV M 04 N M N *4 *0 *4
0R. cR I 't CO t-7 It "1 ,t ,t C4 do el ol .1 MCit N OO. N CO N N 47 00 C0 9.4 N
ote-0
5"4'R8?RE 'LiR8SE§ Pti-IRSEH 14R885. §
pa
01 07 Cb4.4 1,1
F•=4
P4
ti
CG
Ar. co cle! en uRco co cq co el cq
mr e1 41 •
c=1 c9• co Ar C4 C4 C4
CC Ch e• o.
mr co CV mr •
C1 PI C4 m Arcq pi .4 1
"1 't u7 C?e4
N N TA C0 6-4 ,4
mr cn uR 47 04-4 1-1 C4
qt"--wc!":q
cot-
N
oo
ger!oo At uo. . 41 CD N.
00 Ar
CC e'l
Ar Ar U7 40
N ,w1
4; Cq 4; .3! 4R °q
Pc.
NNC401.-1C;
G• N CO mr
2co mmcvm . eR e4 0R qg '-:el m Ar co co co
1-loot000 M V) C7 Mt 01C1'4I 4g.f t.. W
cq.
OIii
•Irie4e4 1
zci cl A el cq OINNNCIC4
.4n1
N 'Ci. C! Cq,4 G4 Tr
4:7 07 -.1!N N .4 -A A
co-4
NQR4 41qC1".P4 C:
en1 ,4 r-4 C4 •-1 N N P4 ,4
T-11
"1 CI 1• 44
• N • N N C4 C4.3.4 CI CI r":
CV 0, 6-1 664
Ch 01 C7 C •• N 71 CA C1
et NI: 00 N Ch cc
. Cl Si cq N • • N cq Ci N.-4N A
•—o N
L°R8RES '488 g ES 141RE;RRIS(Eeiv
7n14nI 6-16-41
-41- ag ta :R•5E1
'4! C4' cl CD
CbA N
'15 c4 cd
°R e4c4 1 4-4 6
•
4.4 Ci CO oN Cr CC pC4 r0 C4 N N •
A
0
g
1.11
40 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
-
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 41
ri UI 04 41 co
CI ul C4 st 04 C4 C4 OR et CI C1 C4
°R -1 C! 'it 'I!rl .11! 41 C1 'I 'IP
° "1 " "1 el ,1 "I "1 el 0. Ca cR -1
*4'4 'I e4 *I 0R el -1 o cR .4 .4 . .4 r4
,"1 Oi co. co 01
EmPa
01.1'v. cl cR cR cR
0,4
C4 C7 C7 CA CI CD. s? ti CV CA CI CICo -4 .4 .4 c4 c4 .4 1.4 44
aq cn r- en oR en co en 4r c; cR co al.4
0-. 0 0% */ es/ eq *I gc: 0. *1 0. 01 el1.0
.
01 410.
CO C/141
CI
CD C4 C4 CV co
el 0/ 'IR a se
01 .4! CIco .4 .4 ..-i
N el ml
co p r-a1 1 1-4 -4 1.4 ..4
N
1-1
cc)
os
AOza
4
4
CI
A
z
ri 41 .4. cR1 ev ev Cy co c4
"1 °R el cR °RV. MMr.laINN
•
v. cR .1 aqCO CO OD 01 C4 C4 C4
aq ul al eq co cpC4 C4 oa co .4 N.-
co eR oR cR cR aq c N
CO t- 411 04. C4 CD-4 .4 .4 .4 N v4 c4
ei cq '1 °I °R 7CI CV e4 C4 C4 C4 co
Ch CD Ch C4 CI col. -4 c4 .4 co co 1.4
CI CO •/ CNN Q100C4 C4 C4 C4 CV 1.-i 9.4
er ei CI C4 00 MDc4 c4 co co C4 4 .444
X q crl q AMC<C4C4N .C4r4
C: ri;N 04
r- 00 C7 uR cn 47t.4 .4 4.4
ao oR oRN 1 1.0 r0
cn oR co co al 41 41ro MD 10 Co 4D
en Co Wco1.4 9.4 e4 CO C4 C4
oR oR co Li, r4
co C4 co c4 c4 c4
Ch CO 0. r4 Cbc4 ei C4 c4 e4 .4
r- v- 01 1.1 CIc4 c4 co co 04 . C4
oo• 9IN. 11
40 CO cm c- ul CO.4 -4 *4 co .4
al C:! CI CD. CI. .1!Cq C4 Cq C4 1.0
eq aq co cR .1.4 -4 c4 C4 CV
't Ul CI Ci CD. "1C4 C4 CV C4 C4 1.4
C4 CD ev CO coo coc4 c4 .4 -4 .4 '
Co r- oR Get. .4 9.4
C4 CO• • InP 1nI • I
c cR en c;N • -
of cn cR cov4.4C4C.14n;
emu;
•C.: C.. 01 C7 CA 1.4
. .4C. ,--1 CA CD 44 CD
.4 .4 .4 .4C.: CA CD cc! co cR
r4 .4 .4OD 10 CI 111 01 st vaocagult-:
.4 .4 .4 1.4 Co
g
• Cq L". Ci 1=ri Cq co cR 1 eq CD .0 CO al -4 oR oR ea ca; oR oR 41 41 Mt1 .4 1.0 1••n TY 121
os
?tE1RaS§§ '-si g $8 ,a§ ,S4R8Sii§ 5? t.9 ER ER ER DER ER ER
NCO.
C.5
0 0
4 0 .wta 3
AlCI
42 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
0II
Z.!
r-
IL
b
"-41-4
A01 OR CR 41 t7 ep CI 0R cR. 0; a "1 °R °R cR °R. cRC.- N OD N CO CO CO t- N N N r-
ci d cl cc. cqQRN I CO 0] • t• N t=
d. W mt mt oi cR co cp co c) 'DN r: r- op . CO CO r- cd Nod • NN N N cod
"1 CO cR. -1 -1 CO CO CO N, Cl CO CO NI:N r: oo co r- . r- r- r- r- r- r- r- t- t- r- r-
r- at cpco COW cR oR to co OR CC! ODN N NN r- cop N • N N CO OD t- t= t= N t= t=
•11 CD CR IC CD 1°. 't "1 '0 Naca cn vs oR ca op opr- r- r- • N • N N t-• r- r- r- r- r- CO oD co r- r- r- r- r- ad r: r- r-
COco
CIR N CR CR 41 CO t= CR CO co ta ICcoNaONNNN r- r- t- t- co r:
CI W. 1%7 ul C!CR CRr- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r-
ci 4747 v. el I°. e. °I '11! el elN r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r-
r-- CO CO CD CO Int": t ft•
"1 ClaoCaooN oomCO CO • r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r-
0
8
a)
2
Q.r--
CV riD CVN5
cra co co c) CO GO ead^CC NNodNN N
117 GV e. "RN r- r- N N N c- cR L-7 cRN N N N N t-01 et -14! U] 01 CRNN [-- r- r- r-
P4 P4gcl
cRN CD N t.
ti I Z a CC CO Ls ICN N r- N r- P.
• COCOCA 03. 'R —1 L".
CO N N COop op oR In N o;r- r- r- r- r- r- r- c'? ''J".
N N t- CO t•%!
zsc./ asF a
•-I
cR cR eD cR u7 °R CIDN N N N N N N
00t.
Cl eg 'I; .1! y?r- r- r- r- r- t- r- op r- r- r- t-
oR CR ClN N VD t- I= co
;To
uR co CO N N cR N m• cR cR C cR co co op co CC! Cl •-1 01 Cl CO CR CO C.1 CI CO eras t=•tZ N t- t- OD t= OD • t. 00 OD t= r- r- N r- r- op op op o) od co CO . OD OD od od
C.1;! CC! C° 0o d Cn uC al 'CI t7 °R °R CO cRNNNNNNN r: r- r- r-- r- r- t- r- r- r- r- r-Ern ul oR al co CO oR co 1.4 C.4 CI clr- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r: r: r: r- c-
tiz
CI vt VR mr. t=. 01 et OR V! r: cor-r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- t-
o; co mt LIR IC CO ul ul mt oR oRCNN r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r-
OR CR 01 CR CO CR CR co; C.: et. • N N N N 4D 4D • N r-• N N N N CO CO r- N N N N N N N N N r-cR "1'0! ". 't cq c7 u7 1CJ cR c7
.9t2RER?1 ,§, '4R8R F4 § :9.888F., § 92888 14-888 cA111-4
A T:,
c 77,0 —0 beg
A .§ 4
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 43
'1 q "14. IO00 t+ t+ 0- t- C-
0 coP ul op clqoD tZt- t- t-
cR el 41 CI00 OD OD OD OD t-
CI 't cR cR c1OD 0- OD CO t- N
op co oq as E.-7r- r- t- t-
0 NNCD NN ► NN
CC! •-n u;t- r- r- OD t- t-
et CV CD CR 01 ODoo cod cd op op 05
aR '1! u/ "1 Co 01co co op co cc. CO
▪ 0I °; 01 '0•comm.:atom
qq q qq.":00 OD OD OD OD GO
14-1R8RE§
°1 °I 01od . op r- op
NN 4D Cn 4R07 CO t+ t+ t-
at 0: CC. 3:).a,
r- r- r- t- oo t-
on op c NI: CV olt: t- t- t-
oo0otiNmuJuRr-: t: t- t- t- t-
oo. 0: °: 0: aR aRt- t- r- r- r-
0. 01 °. qop op t- CC co r-
1.-4 00 'r N CIt-:
oR op op o; opN N r- r- t- t-
OR Cl 01 01 41OD OD oo co CO
CR Cn OR C]t- • DD CD 0- t-
CO
N
0')
44
ti
0
as
A
Go
0
cE
be
14
15
-1 e1 t" 01 0: 01 t".0. ”1co •
.N N r- co a0 N CO
-1 01 cq °R 01 °I aR u1oD t- r- co t- C- t- t- t-
tID:Cr? ".CO C- t- t-
‘1!. 01 OR 41 41 Co. e- t- C- t- • aD
a?01 °R CO CG CO 0: 0: a°:
5 CO oD r- r- r- [- r- r- r- t- t- r-
Cn 4] 41 et CD 01 °I 01 NtON:NON . N NNNn
zF
OD 0: at: so 0: 0- t".Ls: N co n •
on CD. • •1 CI CV Cl Cl to COOD .16 t: . • OD 00 07 co t- r-
CA
op CO ao uo t-
111 C.: OD et N Cr4COw .0D n a) Co 00 w
°D. °1 "1 CD. 07 COQD OD OD OD CO 0- 0-
M 01 OR 41 el. OD 01r- t- t- CZ tZ t•-•
oi ci •-! cp. co. ch. ce;OD OD 00 OD t+ t+ 0-
Co, Cl crt CC ti? °Ico op • N 0- Nn
ftp.F-
E-PPC
P4 *6
Cr!
r- op • r- t- t-
et et cR cR CROD OD od oD cso t-
Co 07 104 c4 CI .tiOD oo oo oo op CO co
.1! op N OY r- r- t: t- oa
:eeD N c. opOD OD CC CC
a1OD
"1 •-1 q '1OD OD 00 OD
131 14; q q "1:Co 07 07 OD aD oD
"TCC CO
01 41 °1 "1:CO CO CO 00
01 -1 01 Ls: 0: cRt- co t- r- t- CC .t
Cl0 CO CO
q °1CO n CO
'4'..28888 Si) as g as 1,9-.R8813., § ci' 1,2.538R8S)nI
CJ
1
ova
ei4g8E u'R88°S
44 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
ks•r•enr.
u? 03 r mar- t- r- t-
o un .44 an 'a .3.
C.7 CO V., 07 07 07• r: r: r:
a/ 0? Ca rr. Do t- t- t- t-
01 CFI C1 CC! C4 07. WI C1 CO 01 u;
c0 t- 00 07 t- t- t- an r- t- too r- r-
ce. ma t: mmo m 03 er 47 C0 r- 07mo r- r- r- t- r-
• cq CCCFr CTSruacar- r- r- r- t- r- r4 r- r- oo t- t-
o? ag c? al 0? ari c!0? cc! °0. "1 0/ 0/r- r- Do r- r- on r- t- r- too t- t-
▪ a% 03 Co a: cc! .3! co oar- r- t- r- r- r- t- • Dor t • oo
• Co ma ca O ca m ua kn In Inr- r- r- ao an r- r- r- r- r: od
• 01 Cl Co m ol ca C• co 00 OD r- r- t- ao r- r- ao r- r-
aa aa m ga NO ma ca ca c4I 67 ao CC CC Do ao 07 CD ao on coo oo
m 'a ''a m .•CO ao ea CC m OD CC CC oo Co0.? 0? 4:r- r- t-
LS
• eq mmo t- t- t-
44 CV 47 CD C4 r- t-r- r- cod r- ad
orz '4! al °R 't t7 ci?radFCdaCr r
CC Cb. Cr] t".. CD.F.- r- r- OD OD
N rl 91 0100 elo OD on
1 0/ '14!v! alr- r r r- t-▪ c! m 0-1r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- coo .
Cr] a-. 0? 03 04 71 0?t-t-t-r-comr- -1an
N OR ID 00 00 vpcl '1 0? o clto OD r- OD OD A r- r- c6
'0 el CO.rio • ea 07
01 '‘O. Cr- r- r- t-
t"-: 0? 0.P P OD r- CO ad
ar? -1 al al 00 't -4!a: °/ CXi ixt Q1 0CC on on m ad ea on r r- r- t- r- 00 6
tor-oe
az
0
"a ca ta ulC CA CC CC OD ao
ca el. cn cg cqDo m t- t- r- t-
0
It,f
011 0? V? al 4? Cr? .4!u7 CTS c4 Cr? 0? °RVD t- OD OD CO 00 OD r- r- OD t- r- r-
ca ol al es; oa cq cq cq cn cqCC U7 CD CO CO V7 CO QD 07 QD CO
,t
.41cis g
CV CD QD aD uR. 774 cv N Co uo ui
14R CI 13.Cl 4CD • N CO u7 0
C4C.? 47 C.": Ci?r4 r- Co V. 07
CgoOu7NCoto to r-Lra
ci en en aRec.-1 ej; c‘i cy
C:7 C? C; Cl CC!1-4 07 07 u7 u7 u7
tel 4-7 al 0? alCO CV COCrj u7 U7
co OD N Co t-co 01 OR oR CDClCOODCOt-
0 rl QR OR upal 07 .1. Co V.
CA -I a? e4..er .vuo-vuo.
• • 1 1 • 1
01 CO• CO r-7-1
u7OWt-Wt"-”4
CD CD CI oR CI coCoN 4, Co co up
Co co. en uR aqmmt-t-mao
Ch;] oR d•CIO CD CD 07 m7P4 TA 04 mi ui ui commuououo
1 1 •
N cR 01 COCCOQMOt-1.4 rA
• N N oRM.-10MMW
C-1 qcq 'CI C-.VD
LI CN1Co • CO C4
CD CO ^0Co 0r-omoom
7-1 7-,
N 7-1 ul7-1 7-1
• Co Co N Co Co
01^t IR IR e4'.14.4 N Co 07 CC
mmt-eacm*c4 crS cei ce; 7-1 cei ce57-1
• 01 N0 BCD al7-17-im000t-*N 9-1
CgClI Cg.1VDC4WWC-*
Co N001--1 7.1 r-; ul uRCO Co Co CC 04 N r4
CO Co CD up CD
co
VD CV CD eh op CZ
• •61 Co C Co C4PINotit-W0:
▪ Co Co en 7-1C- r- Co uS
Co Co CR CO OD ORC4 C4 al C4 ,4
3
1.4R8R?.. § LaRSRH P2SSEH '-esa8SFA
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 45
ot$
.s..
is
ti0
tl1.awN gWacols
4t3 . 1*B
-1412 is
Pr'V
.21213 ed
Cu'"cd4 .2
UV,
an
'61,0cl)
1-4tvZ434L. 0J424-043159
N6
Nen
0
C
0
ti
44
n-a
as
A.
46
0
A
6
ei Cl Oq cR uR Coomolcooz)
N -Cot.- • en t- co r-
Co r-; CN
uO uS ui
tl4n1
CCs CD .0gnI
r?'" qcP qCr? '"U5t: t-WWC
Co . co uo co •-• co4-1 rA
Co 0 CO CO N N CO0401000QC
Co '1 CI CI '-1 .1!
CI C1 0. 41 LI CI C10,1Co Co r0 Co op 00
N N Cq0 C4
C.) 0.5,D-0e
Q
rl e 0 7.7= 0 e.,13 Ts 0el be2 R
ErtNE'z:N
7-1 N Co aoeg QD .4 CD
11
CR C! C4 m• r-c, 04 en OP
4.4 r.1
ul
oR 04 -1 7-1 71 01CD 0 CD 0 0
'1 0 Co Co. NN OD CO Co Ch C4
rACo o0 CO t- t- C-
N 7-1 el/ 01 000 '4! C4 C7 .11:QS Mi 67-1 w-1
1007.-.M7COMrA r4 rA
. Co opop op
N C.4 Op d oR04 en en co7-1
CI CI '1 '1C.4 04 er Ch CO
'I Co -1 -1 CO 01?N Co r- r- uo uoci go. c4 en 01 u;
ao r- VD ao M7 VD VDcio uR a; en enm7
I? t0. 10 00el a7 'ico Co Co N co CD C4 t- CO ODal wl el e4^'clCo Co Co Co Co M7
0q r4 co en en uRN t- t- CD VD 40
7.1 01 en eR clat- CD CD m7 CN u7
7-1
CDt u7 L[•en 01 el co cR ci• 1 1 I I I co -er cueq uo co Q7 CCi VD
46 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
tl121
T'
co"f3g
A CI et oler
c41 c1R mt• co C er
ti N N VI 0. et u] t7• uivs 0 • • . qo rd N C.. C0
• r4 9.4
0N et 0 oq q41 et."0.
z an 10 10 110 NC77
OD •OD 00 • r- to
4 01 01 A 41 Pi C4pm et A A 47 U7
Cl et 01 N et CI A A MI CICl OD cm r- co 0 © on w4
cou C/ CR °R CR t7
ti 2C4 CD CD .r
sCe A et A MD
t7'31 .1 C-W700IQI
tr,
1—i CI ••,1, `4.
111 N •st, et 17 Cbwi 16 4
t- 0i cri qq? N A C4 A AN .r et er k0 CD e7 eiD. CD CD CD LD CD CD
4.alwU . kd
DG
14 N re, Cl tl A A A Cl A OD A pmol in in U7 Ce r.-A N op C.: CZ CD DO CZ
z
10. 0q0qc1 OCI
CN qo A C.1 pm A pm
2°1:2.
.46
4),
et u7 CD et. 07
N1 A C.: A Cl cqqcgm! 'r. L.7
Ci C4 OD ,4 qp
CO N C•1r4 u5 015
q
1 an CI ea CC W ,1c?Q7 q U; el t7r--I • cci • OD Fe C- P on
et)
4
.1 .4: C9 13; qq47 A 4D et et OD to
•
1 10.q4IR er?. CO C<7N cl 0 tl crl '1! 0? cc!N oq cP en CD 47 00 CG 07 4,z 41
1 t8S,
N gt" qc4INO.IODNNNN
1 L,Li g SRNF.,E 51
0414
e2RSEES 2888E8 !-9288E84.4 r4 4.0
C.)
0 0.)
-11 Ty 0pea
.45,dLo cA
Z.Et
8X
•4
X
Et Cl L": '1 CC'3 X an to r-- Mi Lo
Od
ra
a
z
CR el; C7 C? Cel cq 1q CI el CR t.-7 'It "1
n•. .0 CV er CD 10 C4 00 VD c7 rdnA nA C4 , pm cI CO
T.
44
2
Ozais
.4
2
z
0
os
z.s .SGE eo
171 mig
u7 N OI .1 CO CO C4 OD D1 4D LO
CO CO Co 4 A lfy g'
141 e7 cf? u.? '71 cei ”1 ”1 cs cts
REnMNE.71M CO 4 4 a gi
• m! us r-; cc! cs&: CO CO A ;4 CO. it?
846-A2os us e4 cs c4 OD ult- 00 Co en en ud c)
r4
00 c! c4 4D 07 u7 c7 47 col cs uo OD CSDoti cm ,4 c4 op 4 C4 CV CV 04 ci uS
OR et C7 '1 e 41;.' CR al Co C/1 4;CD CI SR
cR—.
us us cs cs cs 41 C/ 'C. 41 '1• co CO Cl CO C.- C4r4 nA 05
40/ OD OR 07 Ce! eq '11
21sga4CR
aI c
ct) CD ui 47V5 At At At At el
4t cD 4D er ctsCW un cti c6 oi 4i u)
N 01e4
Ci "1 t". Ci C1 CO
:4N Co a Co A a
el. C7 147 et CO UR
Fa'28A%2F).▪ gR OR C..; CO .4 CO
A
rn cr?2 g R AM8A c:7;CO r-- os,
CO pCOppc, 0, -• -• Cy? gl CR C4 '11: c7N Yi f4 4,1
"
C4 t7 C1 41 "t V! N"3:v4 LO'a 23 24 N.--1N N N CO
Es' Es: '0. ulti 0? GR 0? t
9 288888 28888811.-1
os cq us us. OD C-
CO t"-: c."4 cc!P2F24MM t•-i-
-1 G4 G? 0?co N
r-C4
MI! Cq
er er uD C4.-. CI CI CI C4
N
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 47
• aq 41 el CR 01 0?G1 Gl -ad cm 7r [ - ai u) r- 47 C4 C4 c4
nA r0 r4 rl nA
°1 GI 0? 00 c? r- 4D "1 C7 CO 'et 00 a? uD CD OD eo aDcv 40 c4 op r- 06 -4 co -4,4 a Co co co cri -4 ,4
- 1.4 rd 1.0
It Co. It 4? Cl Es: 1 t1 Cl "1 "1 '1 4?e, CI? 47 co cs c) ..er -44 ct) Cr? t- C7 es.
nA nA nA nA nA nA nA
cD e• coes, N oR cm el 04 cis.4 CZ CD C4 OD CD 4D au al ch co c)
PA 4-I v-I
°1 u? 04 0? C+10 cr? Glu? "s:
-44 .0, -44 C4 -44 uS au -0. co
ul -1 -1 cis 47 Cr? el Cl? OR CI OR C4
0] 1.0 CD OD 417 cc t- t- C5 05 CP c4nA nA nA
N el Cl u7 CDcl el et C4 [7 et -1 -1 N-44C) N vnI g•a Cr,.or N N NCO er7-1 4-1 1.A
I I 1 • I I
t7 Cr Gq N 7S7
;.71 ;3
OR 147 C.: C.-. el eR 42. cp ul III cc! UR UR 01 glnA In. N CO N .-. CI r4 N • • N 00 CO•
G? "1 u? '1 01 0 GR OD c?01 G?C9• • er ee c4 03 N 00 Co nA nO C4 e-4 c4 03
OD us N N cs N e4 Ls:c? ul N GI G1rA r0 CV CV CV Co er• el. Co 07• • mD er
11.4• 888 . F.1 88E5..8.,
cr?N Co nA Co
48 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
41
2
0
O
a
k
aC
e4 el um OICD Nr C4 1.0 C4 .
el”4 .
CV I
Co q "1 ltC 07 C4
om om cm cm Crm e4C e4 Cl Cl
"/ *4 -1 e4ua •-n
'11! 07 ".d01 0/:
0
04
Es:,4 , ,4 4
e4CV — 1 1
r- om ol1.4
,1 CR Ci CI 01• 4-0 N
C; N el: C4p0 9.4 Cl -4
r el 01 •-t• Cl CV
Ci
qqC4• 1q 'qW4,y ,y
N om am. .4!1.0 1..1 1 I
. q
V] CD CV C.: vl CO4-4 4-4
0, Ch C4 CV Ch-4 -4 -4
cm cm um ul -1 umC4 .--. - pd
M. CD F.. M. 04 70NN ae4
•
kwad
cc!
Cr] CV 01 0i
tc1 01 cl 01 01 '1 e4
ul -1 el um E-; cc!1-1 Co Cl ro p4
117 F.. C CDe4 cd ed od -4
eq um cm• .4. Co Cl ”4
Ch eV CO”4 CO r6 04 e4
Ci "1 u.1 '1: L."'.u0 00 ,r
'0:mr. Co CO
"1 "? el .1
c4 Cl h6 C4 41v... Cl CV -4 -4 r4
CO 4! cm om cn”4 m e4 -4 Co
-cr r- cm cmoi e4 e4 e4 e4
-1 'T *4 -11 C4 CID C4 C4
I I III I I
.5 ;..-+ 'q a:1"T q1 9.4 ti
mr Co
Cl°l el Gq q V7 um Co cm Cl it cm cm
Cl Cl CO Cl e4 -4C4 Oh 01 q041-10DN01,-I
r=1Loe-:-. q q.V. qqt: q
*-1 Cl CO 1.0 p4 C40 ill '1
1.1/ 44 m10 1i1 Co q'qq41:?'":Ch Cl
Cl,-I
'17 CO IL) Co GR. CP :4 ecl Co 2 LL) Co "1 '0! cl um um r.-. um 01 mq .4!o6 1.0 4...
r-. cm r-. cm mm u;.... ..4
01 '1 m/: t": 41 q CI C4 'T 01 e4 "1 '1 ma CO q F..: 0. ClAUR OR OD 0] 4.1 mlL)•7 CO CO COm ua ua um M. 07 CO 07 C4 07 Cl C4 C4 C4 C4 04 5.1 ...I C4 CO CO 1.4 4.0 ..... CO M. C4
r-cm
r7• Ci Le?PO
aqIt) CO
''1R F7'1'tOo,A 1.4 Cl
"" °1t+ CO Co CV ei Vi
PR CD C.: CR Cl 00 1.1 C7 01 Nt: v1 NI: C7...s ,-4 04 C4 C4 CV 07 CV C4 C4 07 07 e4
rq cm om e4 cm . rl om. hem kem om-4 C4 C- VD CD LCD Ni
5,O—IC's t2RSE .3.,§ F".-9R@E5.§ 149S88,@.§
15
r.`
as ,a 01
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 49
el '11 c? e•": v. '0.
" en e4 01 0/'-'c4vmeg eoc4
41 Tr el t7 C1
oledoimmm
cv tO co co CO Co
C4 t7 C7 Cq CO COoi op C4 C4 02 1r
CI CI LE171. v:.mervmm
VI WI u2 CI CI 01C4 CI e4 Co co mr
C- a; CO CD,r; Co
C0 U0 C..: F7 U0 UlCo r4 -er u2
C4 C4 CI 00 to mr
Lsec. qe4"C o?C4 u2 C4 Ch CO1.0 1-0
n228 H §
t-
CA
41-R
0
4
ri
Cr
Cq Oq 610 L".•. Q0CO
IC-. f-I NPryz
3
UI C4 C4 01 0N
el?
ri e4
‘t m 4? mC4 I •
'11 a d C)1.4 1.0
.-n 22882
ao tiD. et et 01 CA
CO Cr
el ,1 01 el?ry •
W. V. G;°04 04 -
oq 0 21 up NCO C4 r4 N
.1 cq et
Nmoi1.4 1.4 04
r- r4 C.: CO.•
q? el? No. '11 N4.4 r0 CO r4 1
222882
011
41 C- CI”4 CO
.1 .1;s1 co; r.1
00 cn00 1
CD 1.0 U0 (40 00,4
CNu2C-040oi
NN 41 C.: C- CI
U0 C7 01 CI ul
el "1 e4le? el
2228N2
C4 CA rl al U1 CICV yr op le
C4 C4 C4 C4 C:! CC.”4 e4 uel .0 up oi
and ea't e? elNNN
CO 00 COO 1A 1.1
eq
N4 NNMW
UI C4 1-4 er op -o r--4 oi 04
uI uR NI: a4 op
.P N ort en U0 T1C4 r•i C4 CV
IR '1 CI 't CI '11.4 CO N C4
5) gR gR ER ?.3
Cl et C4 C4 r0P C4N mr c4
V, 0 et 01 0 etof ey ,r ui
t7 a? 09 "1 '1,-oNNel*
Cl/ CC/ MI 40 00NO2MO2.
e4 e"1 14? e4 ei
oiRo4mejoi
CI Cq 't CI M N00 04 PA ”4 04
e4 1.4 r4
1 7cl!
Ul 01 et C0 00 .....
r-7 WIUl t7 qri 00 04
2228ii§
AO
aX•t Lf?
a. ;413:!oz2
c‘it7 -1 c1 e4, CV rA C4
Nr CD CI CO, tocy en °:? CI 'JR ')0
50 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
e; cq 41 "1 09. 01 4? °R '1 44! IICV el, 1.0 rA C4 CV
"1: 2 41 C.: 4/PP C- C- er
CT)
riop r-
. —1 4 .
2 '. 11 2 CC:: 01 U1 C) re
r.
F- .1 mr F- el elcv r: 04 04 ey00 C: 07 CD 07
.4
r7 co al kg kg
PC:
A0
et et 07 U7 t7 e1 Cl Cl 07 Cl vi OD.4 —I
Ct
ai ep co !c? el? c 1 '- N: CC CP1 Cr] M —n Cl
.1 -4 e4 el c! ell co v.: el .1 1.0 r0 — r0
rocorn 01 C1 01
cNi -4 L'•-•
P'SCq q ti t`. cc? Lr4 ir;
1-D 0'71-1 12.
0 .04Cv co co r7 ul a; r7 W 00
X
r0 al01
1111-4
U1-4
01
tl rla IC in cl el
'T el Ci CI 07 q7 117
IC4 01
4:1q elOz
CO Lc? 'el cl 44 r":ey
r7 C7 Cq Cl V7
.Tr kr: kr; al
°1 4?41 '4! c4
E .o Esr.c-: cr). M
0
44 PI vi! 44 II *4 el eq
44go
0
be g
rge
g gi42 os
L,9-.RERRS,y rg4o w
03
ILO9 -`'• RERRS vnI RERRSrW
as
to
cqsi os;1. ts
5E4 E
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 51
•
0L.
0co
so cc.
1241:14
• .4n
do
0
at N: L.-. L7 .1Eti`4AAX"0.
4
ar1 t-- t- CDA 9.4
cc!"1 01'1 0/1voccsont-
co OD OD C4 Co 00
CR OR CD N VDco To. N 1 Co
ti
CID ICI CA OR
vnI eaOD
Co en oR C4 t7
CI CI Ct .d!
9-1 vnI
Co. cq Ca 5?C3 UD • Co r.
"
CD.C.-. Cl1 1 0.1 Co t-
7.1A4Wcz/m.=-.c4a4A'AR
.mco.no
q 'C: Cq W1WWNIOgOR
'. °I GI 44 "1 0".O! 67 1,1
't CD C4 Cl °I00 Tr CO CO co os
em
qC": q .cr. C1 0.0": on N 01 CR U;N CA OD Co CA Co N OD OD Co +.-1 CV
9.4
qCSIN CIl iq t%: CI Co cR oR Tt kg riN Co .4 o6nCoCo Co N CCO CO CD
Op OR N C F-- 01 Co Co. op Co .--110 Co Co Co 45 m5N Co u5 45 m0 10 CO
O Co q q Co.10m0005ert--
C • (-7 OR n N 41 op OR r7CO 10 • Co 05 Co Co • Co Co Tr us Tr
aR cq ,~u}a,ao C0 N en 01 U1Tr co co op us Tr co
•00 .0. Tr
NOS cq Co Co t7 ft:! el CR OR q 0C '1 .--1 cv 00 VD t- M5 Ai CA MP mtd
z
.w, t1
0
oa as
ei
a 10-*
Co us
Cn UD cRTr uS
1-1iNoDW CI 00 CV C4 e4 ci e4 ci vi T4 co c4 oi 06
4-42:Es,
.g cv 2c4 Co N
n m
C4 NIra NO ca r- oRco co co To c4 .4
:7 cn co CD CD OR 00 ORP4 T4 e4 c4 e4
01 Co CR .4 001.0 .4 .4 N N
COPt.$uR Tt co. cqTr ,r CO CV er
cR u). el c oomr 00 etd eid •Q• mr . co Tr co co
eRes
4
aPI 11. OR OR coORTr 82 ,...,
NNNt": COL'.1 C4 '4!
U5.4 co 4,4 01
.45 0i Oco0 '1 04 cn c!-:ti co .kr-Tvon
mmmmN.0 OD CI OD CQ4.21cooiWw,A r0 1.0 4-0 C4 Cq
CA QD 00 OD 10 05NNNNN Co
Co .1. U5 t7 Co Itct r- 06 un co cci oo
4]°1 0'3 00 '21 mt..4 mmWr-To;4.0 4.0 1.-1
Akg Tr co. co -1
Trcrnict;345 g
Tt co TR
co. caX c2
a Cl VD. 41 01 O.-. Cn
A AAARA24D C". Cld 1
RODM0 .0t-WCA .--I CDciD 04 1.-1 on Co
eu
4.11tl
k0
3
4? cr"PR ci'qc14c7. 1,42.fi
CO c? coR as cq
Co 5:i''0. 007 q04 ci0000004-iN4]
ol q Tr TtTr CD en oo CP c4 aD Ci WOII C1 C1
40 00 UD .4 00 CID
VI Cr .-1 UlN0=0 ,0 1n1
' "1 oRCOODt-0NN
C4 Cs: 'tCo MD Co C4 4.4 1.0
0:2 40CoCr r- r- r4 r4 Co
000OdI Nt-
CD 45 CD Co t- Co
C.]
4.0 1.4 r0
1..1 .Y
.4 .4 1.0
t2RS8i3, § 2200RES1 1n1
5' '2 888E ICs
E8s
..."7".^ 0
80 ..12SI 0
11.6
tr_c %
52 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
Ci CR OR .4! mc. 41 Cl UR oicao go r- an GO C.) of) 1-i
q-P 9-1
NCsr.
Co
Cri
Co
N
. cAZ • C) •1.5r4 4.4 4.4
to1G aLn qC') . C- • to • CO Co Co 4 47 0 co
1-1
°I Ci47 • CO Co CO
OR 9.1 Cl OR 10COCIDCDC7m1• 117
qC7 Co .
r.r.z
CC
Co.n1
Co 'tt- mr 47 07 CilD t- Cr)
N aq 0CO 0 101-4 4.0
41 0. '0: al .+r--: Co 04 CC 6►0 1-1 1-1 1-4
cooas.-ImcoA : mr 115
toL••••
bi
4c
• *
ecl
di
;.1
Co el el te! "3:to • CO mt 07 er
q -'. vIcororomrrtmr
al
Ch Co mr N CJr! CI eq e4
4
0 a
2
CI .1! .
23 N " Co
to 0,© 2
Q]Co
Co
.11.
Cq 'tCo NI.
r4 p4
N Cooo co .
•-n
u1 CA GC! Cq N
Vt Cn1 41N0 1-4 mr QD
q N N "" Co N.Co CD C) CO mr
•-I •-•
A 0 C') CO CD Co • t- 47 10 47 Co CN CIS
to '11 a? GI N Co iA q to CO
Co• CD 47 CC •4 47 CO C- CO CO
Ch
41 OR CR OR C-. -41•+.1
ti? CC:mr 41 mr C7 0 OD1-1 4-1 1-i 1-i
e907 0D C4
•-•1 1•••1 1n1
OD 0- 1n1
-a: on aCo CO • Ls. . Co
Co
Nd Es: CIN
CV
Ls: 1q N CoOD CM C- CO
t••••
Ch v4R Cq mtmr OD mr mr VD '1 t7 Cq
C7 • 1.0cicl E-7U7 Co Co Co
°I a? a?mr U7 U7 U7 CaD U7
Ct.r.rl to Co "1
r- mr t- t". CC CC
149R8 g ?,?.. 2RS8F.F.
CO
erus c4 -0 cs us cqID en I":
°I 07 -1 cq 0u, to cm r-
't qCI°1 41'1CA 67 n t- oo CA
er CM ci C4sPei0747t-0
'1 't Cl N a? 0er oo oouo er co ui
-0 0 Ch r.11.0 I 0.1 •-0 -
01 CS CS CA CA,-Icoe7c00 C4
04 01 61 01 CV QS CA m MS Clci co CA OS CV 0- t- CA 041-4 1.0 1.0 1.0
as ci cl 0p. ms ci oR os cr? ClTr oo er et 47 47 0 sr 07 02 t- t-
cl 01 °I e7 eI c" Cul °I eI °I °I e eI eI c".mo • ro •sl• 0 sr
. 07 CV CO sr sr • 07 CO 'sr 67 c0
0? CS 47 CA CA C7 CA •-1 CU cs cs uo CC os us ep aser uo c6 co ep e; u, er Co er Co ul er er ui er
4; ul u? °I ul cq 01 0I cq eI 1". CA CA CV stsr sr 00 CV sr 07 sr 47 sr cv sr er uo . . ep r- uo
CIJ N Cl CI 41 CC .1! "1 4? 0 CR CI '1 CC 41 41sr CC 47 sr 4D sZN OD 00 42 47 67 et QS CC US OD CC
°I "1 01 01 t7 cl 01 e4 °I 17.el ul *1• t- ao to r4 I co 1 r- •r- ce cm CO04 1.0
P4428aES IL.8ERiS .LIRS g RS1n14.1
Cl 9, 71 '1 CD.CZ 41 C1co 47 sr C6 C7 C4 r- co 10•
CA CS01 OS Cl. 47 t- CC CA C7•-•er
47re ACV1-4 .001,
Cq "1 CO uROD r- 0 CID erai
Qh st C%! 41t-7 V5 V5
C.11,v,SIMRR C')qS 1.1
1,1
1,1 1-1 1,1
co co'' C) r-
C.; -1 et oR c;CM r- cm CM uj CG
'1 F-7 qc=t v. m1muovor-eom11.7cl el as csN ai QS QS t- QS 0
I Ct.CV IScep so
c co as asODD -4 QS 00
ps
vs co ci cs 0-uo cS oo cm m6
0'1
a at
e41-4 040 CA 0
1.0 1.-1
GC0 in
• CR CI1-i 0 ro 147
CV 01 11 41t- to co C 0
04
C1 41 CD 41 '1 '1MI-sNM007
rai
C4 r- cl cs cs *0▪ -4 1.4 co cO er
r- C].-1 oo OD uo r- as 0*• os as co ep.r- r4 vo r- ui co
O CA ci O, 5r?..mr. C,7 't OR C: CI47 47 n t- t- r- co sr sr 47 U2 0- 6S
N0 tl 01 OS 01 41 CS QS47 4P 47 47 er er er oo mo co in
q0 cClq uI L"0CO t• Cs. C... CO Is.
01 c-: c':q0000t-in
coqq 9 c;";44 00t-wmooD;14X aif
C e t":- • N 07 •- .•-•
7 a? '1: a?uR a?q CR a? 't °-up uo er ep ep pi7-PC7NNNNCV
as0
qD sr et Ci
-4 QS 47
1.4 00 ri
121'1 W el
cq ci coCR CI '1 CR 41•-• CV C4 CI C4
2C'7 gg CTIS1.0 1.4
0
2
zabQ
CI
z
8
R2R8RES04 1.0
.5 r
Cn Cn CR CR V.VD VD N r- N r-
cc -1 c4 on Nol on oR NVD t- r"- r- r- VD gp r- r- r-
PS CI CD cv ..cr on on -T. -T. -0 op cYN r- o4 UP uP r- r- N u5
CD 00 CV'14. CI 7Rcc 4' eV 07 47 M99
. c'?
Cn et et US OS VSC4 C4 CV CA CA 07ti CC!C1 CD
CV rr eP CO kr6 irS
cq el! c9 er.Cl07 07 Cl cc 07 07
q1 UP up -0 op r-eo 06 yi er; 06 pi
b4t•-•
E
OD CQ 47117 CV OD0.7 01 vl "I .4 CV CV C4 CD Q7 U7
US " N rr rr
eP CD up op en cyrr rr cD CD CD CD
CT) Q7 00• 07 rr 7r OD OSO r. pcp
co 07 47 CV et rlC7 uP UP
54 CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORT 25, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
cy 01 -0 co re? op. -0. -1 cR cy co. up -T. LeR oR 470p as oo co op op [07 00 00 co 00 co as op co op 07 07
Fl CD 47 CV ...ti M cy en 07 c4 on op o- on co op. oper, " CO CV N ea Oa C•0 CV CO Cl CV CV
et et CR rl et 01 N rl V] 00 'Tr "et t0 g0" .0 0,1 CV c'i -4 -4 -4 -4
C1 CD eiD 6745 7? °q el el NN 472 cli? el e": 74 74-4 -4 .14 oi er 07 rr cy op co cy en ot el CV C4
I: co oP en co cmI-y..cr op r- up up upcc• 'IR V. CC:' '1 C) C1
Lrw C4 Cl rr cc 07 01
FE-16 CR VD Q7 CD U7 CD 0
C.) en c4 e‘i e‘i
CD vD u7 u7 "
N
ODes5
CVCIS N e' N m 00•-k cc er 10 eq 'JR
..• cry
• -4 " 06 e4 ,4 -
e4 op 1t7D 0 co oD CP " CO 0 CV m 07 C4 VD CV co co o07 00 CID CD CD "CD
F-11 22 8 22 2!
22 2 C9 C14
. *0:
CD C00 " et et " " et 47 117 1.700 00 co ao op uD up op op oo up oo
N CD .4 .4 Nv Cl .1 .1 N.r. m. .4
er vR 01 uD CA CR CR el en cO r:" 04 .4
C? '1 '1 OR CR Cri "R CI? 71 'I u?rr C4 07 04 4 ot " ot 4.,4n Nr,
aq CC CCNan co-e CV CVed
4:4 OD CD CID op C4-4 -4 06 N - -4
004 nT co. co 01
C "
▪ CR NC CO 07 CDeq
0ocCCNNCDeP C') CQ N CID N
qt
c2, 2R uaR2, oc 2? 2R =3 23 g 2R
2B 2R 2R 2R 2R 23 23 g g
▪ °q '7. el Led ?▪ e07 e4 cD
. 71 '1 71 q 1C7 vi C4 CNi .4 CO kr) of
"er, " " Ci r- -41. "4 CD rr
4.4 up up
U) 1l7 CI N CD 147
1.4
g§ 22e,-er en aC'ICi ig g8r-
cP,Tr- et r- r- en
C' 'Lc C)op op r- cy GNu7 r- r- r- uD a8 '' ° 047CO CV u?
Q7 r- OD OD CO 07C 4 0 0 UD
CD 00 Q7 C4 r- rrN N C707 eP eP
8 8 80 0.) t-- tO 1X711.
2 2 A gCM el en u7 u7 up
r.
up cp up op up oC. nN NV UD Cc 47r- uD u7 C4 u,
8 8 2 2 V2 2.0 al CM CD 00 ao r- t-v-I
oR un cn enCD VD 00 CO ao oD-4•Lei el 7? cl; -4 -4
eC4* CD 0 el u7-4 -4
oo NO 67 " opco r- 0n" -4 -4
O V. VD UD CI1 NV'3: CrJ cl-4 "
N co co o- Co CDCD OD 4D co. .0. on en
in 888 c4 P.a'Ag8g
in888c'iti9
pra
VD OC VD eT t- CC C 07 C cc uR NVer pcr2 co to to el
NVUDCD0,-•ot op o0
"l op
CV "
Q7 CD 47 CV OD coco op on op en cy-4 -4
C3J
ta
C.)
tlC.)
Co
tle
.1It) aU
it 14
4.a
40
44 4-8 t
yvaCn0C.) t;
F.
2 e1,.10
g61 to
•
yy(a) 0
EE zzt.
IaPc,
0
0oa
OR
z
z
00Cb1.4U0NCh
00N
4-1U0rn
ccNa.,
00Cr]
00Nom
NCD
00
OD
47NCD1.•
opNem
uPr-cn
ooN
as
cri4-1
Xr)
4-1
0000
NC6
cc
on
upNon
coNr.
1
1.
L.
0,
es
thi
su
t. U°tl
O Ncr)r.
.z. 7-1
Ci IP
C
g •41
4Seelo cu
Eti E
•
•
• C- CV VD 07 r-
71 .-I °C! 117 CC!07 C4 C4 CV cv "
OS 07 CD 00 CV CR 01 VD et" er NV NV 01 .4 CD NV VD OD OD
c.1Lq tE
• Cl 47 CV 07 00C4 CV rr ,4 0,
C4 tN CD CDC4 .4 C4 CO OD CD
CD N CO CD OD CO-4 -4 -4 " CV 04
01 -!-0
C7 C7 cqN c‘l cc en
[7] 00 CD o00CN C7 CI C4 rr
C.)
0
00
0
t-n
Cc)
CD
ODCDrr
00
co
oo
CO
00
00
CD
00['-CMr4
CO
4–I
Tr
QD
NC-m
cc)-4
aD
r.1
00
00
4nI
e-a;
Ltl q q. OD oD co MD OD
°? 0? 01 .-"-10
Ci C7 4R C. C.rw rr V5 Oi
.40vmao 10.7 CC. _ .
ti
't 0w."1 01 07.-404NN
CO u7.4 c4 oi ol .4
0? '1 '1 '1 °D 'rC4 C4 C4 Oi
N0[-M000c404,4C4CAN
qw! N m"R qmm*idesoco
47 CV el: OR C7NI. up co m;
cs r- OD OD r-KO OD rq pi wr.-4 -4
Cp CD00.
cla cR op.4 -4 -4
op co g OD oDC1 C1 C1 c1 t.: t":
00 °? 41 Ci .3: 41000 N op 00 00
'q CI CI '1: CO Cc)rW 4.4 .-Irw
OT OD er W r-.4 -4 -4 .4 c4 04
000pV0
°? C4 111 1" qul er er CO CO
N N 8:2.N -4 "
q 'tCOIN
N Ch
C4
W upN 00 CO
URCINN-INN N
CR CR C?
8 F, 1,102:
6 6 .,0140..
0:1
d0'Cfl N-I CO CO El
7.1:.
;Li 2 8do4 gg g
0"1
uP ea.cr.?up 04
00 -4
▪ ChAL100000 n–n1
A " A
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SUGARBEET PROCESSING WASTE WATER 55
1 ,,R §§E00 r"-
..ACrzwOW9.4
Cl C4 UR qrCr Cr CZ CZ CZ
CV Cl CV CV Di OR PD CR CR CV 04 coco co op on oo op xi co CG Cd 06
O u7 in et er ea 01 et cle4 .4 oi eg 04 c4 -4 eq cq c4 eq C4
oR oR 00 00 ta 0 0 CD 0
-4 -4 -4 .4 .4
oRal ao oR coR op C4.4N .4 N -4
.13 3 00V11320413iT PAINRONO DIFF1O3i 1930 323.453/5550
top related