tysons tysons corner circulator study board transportation committee june 12, 2012
Post on 27-Mar-2015
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Tysons
Tysons Corner Circulator StudyBoard Transportation Committee
June 12, 2012
Tysons
Tysons Circulator Study
1. The Comprehensive Plan for the Tysons Corner Urban Center calls for a System of Circulators in Tysons Corner to:
A. Provide quick and convenient access for Metrorail passengers to and from locations within Tysons but beyond walking distance from the Metrorail Stations, and
B. To provide a quick and convenient way to travel within Tysons.
Background:
Tysons
Tysons Circulator Study
2. Follow-on motion 11 specifically pertains to the Circulator Study and directs staff to “issue an RFP for the circulator study” and to “bring the results of that study to a future Board Transportation Committee Meeting for discussion”.
3. An RFP for the Circulator Study was issued in December of 2010 and the contract was awarded to a team lead by AECOM in March of 2011.
Background:
Tysons
Study Purpose
• LONG RANGE (2050) Planning study to support Tysons Corner redevelopment and rezoning process– Design circulator system to support goal of maximizing
transit trips/minimizing auto trips
• Identify needed transit preferential treatments – Support a reliable and effective circulator system– Identify required expansion of right of way – may require
additional adjacent land
4
Tysons Circulator Study
Tysons Planning Process
• Peer analysis of circulator systems in other cities • Project goals and objectives • Network development process • Long range ridership forecasts• Transit preferential treatments • Mode options • Operating and capital costs • Finalize recommendations
5
TysonsNetwork Development Process
• Five preliminary networks developed initially– Based on sound route design principles– Long range design based on 2050 forecasted
conditions – Evaluated based on number and percentage of
trips beginning/ending within ¼ mile of each network
– Network #1 and Network #2 selected for more detailed evaluation
6
Tysons
7
Network #1: Three Route Network
Tysons
8
Network #2: Four Route Network
Tysons Ridership Forecasts
• Utilize regional forecasting model – reflect 2050 conditions
• Four key variables impact ridership– Service frequency – Circulator fare – Parking cost – Travel time (speeds)
9
Tysons Ridership Forecasts
• Two ridership scenarios
10
Scenario #1 Scenario #2
Frequency 6 minutes peak, 10 minutes off-peak
4 minutes peak, 6 minutes off-peak
Fare $1.00 No fare
Parking Costs Higher than Tysons currently – reflects costs
in Wilson Boulevard Corridor
Higher than Tysons currently – reflects costs
in Wilson Boulevard Corridor
Travel Speeds Based on Lower Level of Dedicated Transit Lanes
Based on Higher Level of Dedicated Transit Lanes
Tysons Ridership Forecasts
• Scenario #1 (Mid-range variables)
• Scenario #2 (Aggressive variables)
11
Network Total Ridership Transfer from Metrorail
Non-Metrorail Riders
Network #1 17,600 6,200 11,400
Network #2 16,600 7,400 9,100
Network Total Ridership Transfer from Metrorail
Non-Metrorail Riders
Network #1 33,700 12,300 19,400
Network #2 33,300 14,400 18,900
TysonsDetailed Network Evaluation
• Evaluation criteria – Daily ridership– Boardings per revenue hour – Operating cost per rider– Capital cost per rider– Circulator travel time between select
origins/destinations – Change in transit mode share
12
TysonsDetailed Network Evaluation
• The three route network performed better than then four route network on most of the key evaluation results. Ridership estimates were close between the two options.
• Preliminary Staff Recommended Network – Three Route Network
13
Three Route Network
Four Route Network
Ridership XProductivity X
Operating Cost per Rider X Capital Cost Per Rider X
Tysons Mode Evaluation
Purpose:
14
• To identify the most appropriate transit mode for each route within the selected circulator network.
Tysons Mode Evaluation
Based on:
15
• Projected ridership, • Capacity of Mode,• Headway requirements, • Right of way requirements,• Roadway congestion levels along each route,• Constructability of required, infrastructure to support each
mode, • Impacts of selected mode on other modes sharing the roadway
network, and• Maintenance facility requirements
Tysons Mode Evaluation
Modes evaluated:
16
• Streetcar
• Bus (40’ and 60’ lengths)
• Driverless Personal Rapid Transit
Tysons Mode Evaluation
Mode Recommended: 40’ and/or 60’ Bus
17
• Sufficient capacity to meet ridership demand can be achieved on all routes, under both networks, through the use of a 40’ or 60’ bus.
• Lower capital and operating costs.
• Greater flexibility to be re-routed as required.
TysonsTransit Preferential Treatments
• Types – Dedicated transit lanes – Queue jumps – Transit signal priority
• Factors considered – Level of congestion (speed)– Queue length at intersections – Transit vehicle volumes– Person carrying capacity
18
TysonsIdentified Areas for Exclusivity
19
Tysons Next Steps
• Select final network• Finalize transit preferential treatment
recommendations, as appropriate• Calculate costs • Refine ridership forecasts – final network • Complete final report in July 2012• Recommend Relevant Changes to Comprehensive
Plan• Begin process to secure funding
20
Tysons
Questions
21
top related