u. s. bureau of labor statistics 1 naics 2007 a small revision draft february 2006
Post on 03-Jan-2016
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
NAICS 2007
A small revision
Draft February 2006
What is included?13 SPLITS• 13 2002-based industries that split into more
than one 2007-based industry
7 DIRECTS• 7 2002-based industries that can be directly
converted from one 2002-based code to one 2007-based code
1 QUARTER• Dual coding for only ONE reference quarter
Splits—One to more than one
• 1 split industry has 7 possible 2007 industries
• 1 split industry has 5 possible 2007 industries
• Remaining split industries have only 2 possible 2007 industries
• In most splits, one of the possible 2007-based codes is the original 2002-based code
Split 2002-based NAICS111219 Other Vegetable
(except Potato) and Melon Farming
111998 All Other Miscellaneous Crop Farming
315211 Men’s and Boy’s Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors
315212 Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’ Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors
326199 All Other Plastics Products Manufacturing
326291 Rubber Product Manufacturing Use
326299 All Other Rubber Product Manufacturing
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
339111 Laboratory Apparatus and Furniture Manufacturing
518111 Internet Service Providers
525930 Real Estate Investment Trusts
541612 Human Resources and Executive Search Consulting Services
541710 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Directs—One-to-One Relationships
A few industries involved in the revision can be converteddirectly from their 2002-based NAICS code to theirappropriate 2007-based NAICS code. These codes are:
• 516110 Internet Publishing and Broadcasting
• 517211 Paging
• 517212 Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications
• 517310 Telecommunication Resellers
• 517510 Cable and other Program Distribution
• 517910 Other Telecommunications
• 518112 Web Search Portals
Workload impact on FY 2006, 2007, and 2008
• Except for REITs, all records that were known to be part of revision were excluded from the 2006 ARS
• Any record responding to revision in 2007 will be excluded from 2008 ARS
• Only 68,000 records involved in revision, nationwide
WIN States (2005/1 query)Alabama 568Alaska 97Florida 3,597Georgia 1,611Illinois 2,748Maine 282Massachusetts 2,273New Hampshire 397New York 4,102North Carolina 2,131South Carolina 681Vermont 160Washington 1,822
New CMI codes
05 2007 NAICS Revision, NVS
15 2007 NAICS Revision, NVM
25 2007 NAICS Revision, central review
New or Changed Response Codes
57 Code change from non-refiling source resulting in a
2007-based NAICS code
76 NAICS, county/township, ownership code change also
results in a 2007-based NAICS code
77 2007-based NAICS code assigned with no other NECC
41 Revision record responds and the 2007-based NAICS is
the same as the 2002-based NAICS
46 Same as before but must not have a different 2007-
based NAICS code
Dual Coding• From the beginning of refiling (creating the
ARS control file) through the end of 2007/1 processing
• About 8.5 million records nationwide—most will retain the same NAICS code
• Directs will be dual coded by the systems
• Splits will be refiled
• New Accounts—a little more effort needed
Dual Coding New Accounts• Begin dual coding new accounts as soon as the FY2007
control file is created• If the record is active prior to 2007/1, then a 2002-based
code is required for 2006 data. – If a direct, the system will assign the 2007 code. – If a split, obtain adequate information to assign both and include
as a 57 on the control file.
• If active in 2007/1, then put a 2007-based code on the record in the NAICS field and attempt to assign the 2002-based code if necessary. – The system will attempt to do reserve directs.– Continue this for any retroactive account that were active in first
quarter and still being added to the file.
• For records that become active after 2007/1, assign just the 2007-based NAICS code
Storing Multiple NAICS Codes
Where do all the NAICS codes go?• When working on 2006 data,
– 2002-based code goes in the NAICS field– 2007-based code goes in the 2007/1 field in
WIN– Corrected 2002-based code goes in the
NAICS02 field
• When working on 2007/1 data– 2007-based code in NAICS– Final 2002-based code in NAICS02
NAICS02 —aka formerly NSTA
What is NAICS02?
• The name the BLS has selected that will almost certainly confuse at least ½ the people
• Once known as NSTA
• Really just a currently unused 6-digit, quarterly field that already exists on the file
NAICS02• Final 2002-based code• Must be user or system assigned for all active
2007/1 records on the file• Will be a place to store the corrected 2002-
based NAICS code during refiling• Example: If Jones, Inc was originally coded as
A in the 2002-based code, gets refiled, should have been B under the 2002-based codes, which is actually a split and becomes C under the 2007-code, then B would be entered through the system in the NAICS02 field.
• Better (hopefully) examples follow.
Ex. 1—Refiled direct, no other change
Year/Q NAICS NAICS02 CMI RC
2006/2 518112 Blank 00 01
2006/3 518112 Blank 00 31
2006/4 518112 518112 00 31
2007/1 519130 518112 00 77
Ex. 2—Refile record, no revision change
Year/Q NAICS NAICS02 CMI RC
2006/2 451140 Blank 00 01
2006/3 451140 Blank 00 02
2006/4 451140 451140 00 41
2007/1 451140 451140 00 41
Ex. 3—Revision record, no other code change
Year/Q NAICS NAICS02 CMI RC
2006/2 111219 Blank 05 01
2006/3 111219 Blank 05 31
2006/4 111219 111219 05 77
2007/1 111211 111219 05 77
Ex. 4—Refile record, changed to a direct
Year/Q NAICS NAICS02 CMI RC
2006/2 541519 Blank 00 01
2006/3 541519 Blank 00 31
2006/4 541519 518112 00 76
2007/1 529130 518112 00 76
Forms and Descriptions
• No changes to the forms
• Two sets of revision descriptions—one for NVS and one for NVM– Phrasing awkward on NVM if not modified– Clearer for the respondent
• Multiple choices on the forms for splits, regular descriptions for the rest
• Also asking for percentages on splits
Auxiliary Code
• Will discontinue Auxiliary codes effective
with the September 2006 system releases
• Will be dropped from the TRS
• Will be defaulted to “known not to be a
support unit” on the forms until we replace
the forms in FY 2008
• Eliminating the edits as well
Nonresponse Handling• Every record will need both the 2002-based and
2007-based codes
• Remember, most split industries split into one of
two codes and most times one of the codes is
the existing code
• System generated nonresponse codes provided
in the past did not always yield the best results
Summary Management Report
• Added separate page for revision work
• Reflects new response codes
• Changed the file output format
• Changed response rates
• Added revision response rate
Response Rate—Everything Version
Total Response Rate:
30 + 31 + 41 + 42 + 46 + 50 + 57 + 63 + 64 + 65 + 76 + 77
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00+01+02+03+ 04 + 11 + 30 + 31 + 41 + 42 + 46 + 50 + 57 + 63 + 64 + 65 + 76 + 77
Usable Response Rate:
41 + 42 + 46 + 50 + 57 + 76 + 77
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00+01+02+03 + 04 + 11 + 30 + 31 + 41 + 42 + 46 + 50 + 57 + 63 + 64 + 65 + 76 + 77
Response Rate—Revision Rate
Total Revision Response Rate:
(RC=57+76) + (CMI=05,15,&25 & RC=30+31+41+42+63+64 + 65 + 77)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (RC = 57 + 76) + (CMI = 05, 15, & 25 & RC ≠ 57 or 76)
Usable Revision Response Rate: (RC = 57 + 76) + (CMI = 05, 15, & 25 & RC = 41 + 42 + 77) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (RC = 57 + 76) + (CMI = 05, 15, & 25 & RC ≠ 57 or 76)
Edit Changes
• 2 dropped edits related to auxiliary codes
• 17 modified edits, typically because of new response
codes
– would only impact records that were refiled and had an invalid
response code
• 1 new edit
Dropped Edits
041 – Invalid Auxiliary Code
142 – Inconsistent Auxiliary/NAICS
Combination
Modified Edits010 – Invalid NAICS code012 – Invalid Ownership code013 – Invalid County code016 – NAICS and Ownership Inconsistent046 – Invalid ARS Response Code/Year065 – Inconsistent County/Township Combination074 – Invalid Old Ownership075 – Invalid Old County076 – Invalid Old County/Old Township Combination078 – Invalid Old NAICS code120 – Possible Non-economic Code Change123 – Expected Code Change Not Made146 – Old Codes are Inconsistent with 4th Quarter Codes156 – Predecessor/Successor County Code Conflict157 – Predecessor/Successor Ownership Code Conflict159 – Predecessor/Successor Township Code Conflict164 – Predecessor/Successor NAICS Code Conflict
New Edit (Short Term)017 – Invalid 2002 to 2007 NAICS Code
Relationship• Only run on 2007/1 data
• Checks NAICS02 code for a valid 2002-based
code
• Checks NAICS code for a valid 2007-based
code
• Checks crosswalk that NAICS02 and NAICS
codes are related
3 CCS Files
• Regular CCS
• Revision CCS
• Production CCS
Regular CCS• 2002-based code noneconomic code changes that
reflect corrections to the 2002-based NAICS code
• No 2007-based NAICS changes for 2007 CCS
• Noneconomic county code changes
• Noneconomic township code changes if in New
England or New Jersey
• Noneconomic ownership code changes
• No format changes
Revision CCS
• Strictly on 2007/1
• Compares both NAICS codes
– 2007-based NAICS code in NAICS field
– 2002-based NAICS code in NAICS02 field
• Can be used by users or those publishing
to determine the impact of the revision on
the data shifts
2007 Production CCS• Will reflect noneconomic and revision changes
occurring between 2006/4 and 2007/1
• Includes the regular CCS criteria
• Direct changes
• Split changes
• For 2007/1, will use the special production version of the CCS to generate the new Summary of Difference File for the Macro Edit Integration
Macro Processing
• Will switch from 2002-based codes in 2006/4 to
2007-based codes with 2007/1
• Will handle changes using the special 2007
production CCS and summary of difference files
• Will not retain 2002-based version and 2007-based
version
• Any push back work will do will be done outside of
EXPO and WIN
Other Issues• All this information is potentially subject to change
but most should remain as described.
• Still trying to work out what the other programs will
be getting and when, particularly CES, OES, MLS,
LAUS
• Will be discussed in detail at the technician’s
conference
• Training will be provided
top related