un global compact – consequences for our · pdf filefidic 2011 conference seminar 2...
Post on 12-Feb-2018
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
FID
IC 2
011
Con
fere
nce
Seminar 2
Flemming Bligaard Pedersen
Financial Management and Good Governance
UN Global Compact – Consequences for our profession
Monday, 03 October 2011, 16.00 – 17.30
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
UN Global Compact –Consequences for our profession
By Flemming Bligaard Pedersen President and CEO
Ramboll
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011 Agenda
RambollThe Dubai case The core element Lessons learnedActions takenFIMS procedures affected
FIDICResponsibility of the Industry
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011 The Dubai case
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
21 February 2011 -Headline in one of the leading Danish newspapers: “Ramboll accused of slavery”
“Ramboll accused of involvement in slavery”
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
In February 2011, the NGO Danwatch published a report on working conditions for migrant workers in Dubai’s construction industry
The report documented that two large contractors, ArabtecConstruction and Al Habtoor Leighton with whom Ramboll worked on 8 projects in Dubai, kept construction workers under slave like conditions
This story found its way to the Danish media 21 February 2011 and the days after, with about 60 articles in newspapers, magazines, television and on the internet
The Dubai case
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
The two contractors mentioned took part in construction projects where Ramboll was involved as a consulting engineer for the developer – no contractual relationship existed between the contractors and Ramboll
Major impact on Ramboll’s image in Denmark - consequence of being a global company
The Dubai case
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
Ramboll is a participant in the UN Global Compact and embraces the ten principles within:
human rights labour rights the environment, and anti-corruption
Ramboll became a participant in 2007 as a natural continuation of our fundamentals. We are committed to continuously achieving and showing progress within these areas
The core element
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
The allegations against Ramboll state that we by silent complicitysupport the violation of human rights and are indirectly responsible for the behaviour of these contractors
Meaning that Ramboll failed to comply with the 2nd principle of the UN Global Compact:
1. Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
2. make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses
Through the UN Global Compact, we are obligated to respond to the actions of collaboration partners to whom we are not connected contractually
The core element
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
Human Rights1. Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
2. make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses
Labour3. Businesses should uphold the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective
bargaining;
4. the elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour;
5. the effective abolition of child labour; and
6. the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation
Environment7. Businesses should support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges;
8. undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility; and
9. encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies
Anti-Corruption10. Businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery
The core element The ten principles:
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
In Ramboll, we are strongly against violations of human rights as described in the DanWatch report.
Ramboll strives to become a community consultant on a global scale. We know that corruption and violations of human rights occur in all countries with varying intensity.
We want to behave ethically and professionally in all our associations. We will promote the principles of the UN Global Compact and seek to implement them when we have the opportunity to influence.
Lessons learned
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
However, we must admit that we were not well enough prepared for the consequences of our commitment
Focus has been on business integrity and conventional auditing
Human rights have not been included in the risk assessment of projects
We have not succeeded in making our employees fully aware of what our commitment really means - securing the right business behaviour also in relation to human and labour rights
What happens in one market can have major effect on other markets – consequence of being a global company
Lessons learned
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
We continuously strive to live up to the UN Global Compact. This is a process which means that we continuously launch initiatives that strengthen our alertness and procedures in accordance with the principles in the UN Global Compact.
If, through any of our projects, we encounter problematic circumstances of a professional or business ethical character –including matters concerning human rights - it is always our duty to actively making the customer or business partner aware of this. If we find that the actions taken do not live up to our expectations, we have to reconsider the basis for further collaboration with the customer or business partner.
Actions taken
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
The Dubai case has given us reason to entail a more systematic approach in relation to issues concerning human rights
We have introduced an ‘Obligation to act’ policy to guide employees on what they must do and why this is important to do
The policy also outlines a ‘policy statement’ which we proactively must ensure that all customers and suppliers receive
The policy statement outlines:
Ramboll’s position on sustainable development and good corporate citizenshipOur expectations to our customers and business partners That we will act, make aware, and go into dialogue if we identify matters that are unacceptable
Actions taken
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
To make the ‘Obligation to act’ policy operational, we are adjusting our FIMS quality management procedures and systems to include other aspects under our corporate responsibility concept
We are communicating and training employees of the policy’s meaning, importance and impact on our business behaviour
We are communicating our policy statement to all customers
Actions taken
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
The scope of the FIMS requirements (potential wrongdoing) is in Ramboll expanded to include violation of human rights, labour rights and the environment, and is not limited to bribery, extortion, fraud and collision as previously
FIMS Integrity policy‘Obligation to act’ policy/code of conduct
FIMS tools & manuals Quality management integrity manuals and guidelinesProject risk assessment Project integrity screening form Project integrity record file
FIMS documentation & approval Audits Management reviewQuestionnaire and reporting of integrity critical customers and partners
FIMS procedures affected
FID
IC D
avos
Con
fere
nce
2011
The risk and challenges we face in this area are not specific to Ramboll but generic to our industry
Professional consultancies experience increased sustainability requirements from customers and society
Focus has been on business integrity, but what about human rights, labour rights and the environment?
The increasing globalisation challenges our profession on sustainability – do we have the right attitudes and structures in place to act responsibly?
We must establish common policies and procedures to ensure sustainable growth within our industry
Responsibility of the Industry
top related