university of wisconsin-madison 2002-03
Post on 02-Feb-2016
37 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
University of Wisconsin-Madison2002-03
• 41,507 Students– 28,677 undergraduate students– 12,830 graduate & professional students
• $1.7 B annual budget
• 2,060 faculty, 15,770 total employees
• 54% women (compared to 50% 10 y ago)
UW-Madison Research
• UW-Madison is ranked 3rd overall and 2nd among • public universities in research expenditures
$>600M university wide$>100 million College of Engineering
• College of Engineering is ranked 13th in nation • Nuclear Engineering is ranked 1st in Public Universities• Technology innovation
– >325 patent disclosures in FY 2002– >100 patent disclosures from the College of Engineering in FY03
UW-Madison College of Engineering
• Twelve undergraduate degrees in eight academic departments
• Sixteen graduate Masters and Doctoral degrees• Research programs in all disciplines
– ~ 200 faculty active in >30 Research Centers– $103 M in research expenditures
• [65% federal, 20% industrial, 15% state/institutional]
• Growing undergraduate and graduate student populations– ~3775 undergraduate students– ~1550 graduate students
The University of Wisconsin Has a Balanced Fusion Program
Theory
Engineering Physics, Physics
ExperimentalEngineering Physics, Physics,
Electrical Engr. & Computer Science
Technology
Engineering Physics
Wisconsin Fusion Program
Started 1963;
Over 330 PhD Graduates to Date
There are 5 Major Fusion Programs on the UW-Madison Campus
• Fusion Technology Institute• Fusion Technology Institute• Center for Plasma Theory & Computation• Center for Plasma Theory & Computation
• • Pegasus Plasma Physics Laboratory
Engr. PhysicsEngr. Physics
• HSX Stellarator Lab
Engineering
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Physics• MST Lab
There Are Many Experimental Fusion Devices on the University of Wisconsin Campus
There Are Many Experimental Fusion Devices on the University of Wisconsin Campus
Pegasus - Engineering Physics
RFP – Physics HSX - Electrical & Computer Engineering
IEC - Engineering Physics
Run 26590kV, 30mA
Over 325 PhD’s Have Graduated from the UW Fusion Program
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
350
1965
1967
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Cu
mu
lati
ve N
um
ber
of
Ph
D's
Gra
du
ated
Fusion Technology-95
Plasma Theory-76
Plasma Experimental-155
The 326 PhD Fusion Graduates From the University of Wisconsin are Evenly Distributed in the U. S. Workforce
Industry35%
Academia32%
U. S. Government Labs28%
Other5%
• Develop Clean, Safe, and Economical Fusion Energy Sources for Use in the 21st Century
• Create Near-Term Commercial Products that Use Fusion Energy to Enhance the Quality of Life
Educational Impact of theFusion Technology Institute
• Largest Program in the United States for Advanced Degrees in Fusion Engineering
• Ph.D. Fusion Technology Graduates since 1970 (over 95 thus far) occupy key management positions in U.S. Industry, National Laboratories and Universities
Mission of the Fusion Technology Institute
Coupling of 3D CAD with Neutronics -
SNL
Liquid Metal Safety - DOE
Current Research
Activity - FTI
Current Research
Activity - FTI
High Power Density Blanket Modules - DOE
Next Step OptionsUS -DOE
Space Propulsion Systems -
NASA/DOE
IEC Advanced Fuels -
Grainger/Greatbatch
Z Pinch Reactor Design
- SNL
High Density Opacity - DOE
ICF Target Performance - U. Rochester
Shock Wave Effects on Liquid Surfaces - DOE
High Average Power Laser
Chamber - NRL
Advanced Fusion Reactor Design -
DOE
Materials for Pulsed Power -
NRL
Greenhouse Emissions from Energy Sources
*in conjunction with other universities, national and international labsCalendar YearCalendar Year
9696
SOLASE
SOLASE-H
TDF*
HIBALL*
LIBRA*
HIBALL-II*
SIRIUS
SIRIUS-M
APEX*
LMF*
SIRIUS-T
SIRIUS-P
LIBRA-LiTE*
SOMBRERO*
OSIRIS*
19761976 7878 8080 8282 8484 8686 8888 9090 9292 9494
NIF*
LIBRA-SP*
9898
X-1/Z-Pinch*
0000
Fusion Technology Institute IFE/ICF Reactor Studies
0202
ARIES-IFE*
Z-Pinch
HAPL*
Light Ion Beam (6)
Laser (10)
Heavy Ion Beam (4)
Z-Pinch (2)
0404
Engineering Centers Building1550 Engineering Drive
1003Tong Auditorium
Posters, Refreshments,
Lunch
1025Technology
Transfer Presentations
1045Breakout
Target Heating
Main Entrance
Men’sMen’s Women’sWomen’s
Lot 17 Parking Ramp
University A
venue
N
Breese Terrace
Agenda for High Average Power Laser Program WorkshopUniversity of Wisconsin
Engineering Centers Building, 1550 Engineering DriveSep 24 and 25, 2003
All oral talks will be in the Tech Transfer Auditorium
WEDNESDAY, SEP 24, 2003
INTRODUCTION:
8:00 - 8:30 Coffee, pastries, bagels, etc All
8:30 - 8:50(20)
Welcome + Logistics Jerry Kulcinski (Wisc)
8:50 - 9:10(20)
Introduction. J. Sethian (NRL)
LASERS (Session chairman TBA)
9:10 - 9:35(25)
Mercury Diode Pumped Solid State Laser C. Bibeau (LLNL)
9:35 - 10:00(25)
Electra KrF Laser J. Sethian (NRL)
10:00-10:10(10)
LASERS DISCUSSIONS All
BREAK-- Tong Auditorium, Engineering Centers Building
10:10 –10:25(15)
Posters will be up for entire workshop All
FINAL OPTICS (Session chairman TBA)
10:25 – 10:50(25)
Final Optic Progress Evaluation of Al coatings on SiC, including many shot exposures and more
M. Tillack (UCSD)
10:50-11:05(15)
Ion Mitigation in final optics R. Abbott (LLNL)
TARGET DESIGN (Session chairman TBA)(Discussion deferred to Target Survival Workshop)
11:05 –11:25(20)
High Gain Target Designs (NRL) D. Colombant (NRL)
11:25 - 11:45(20)
High Gain Target Designs (LLNL) J. Perkins (LLNL)
Posters for High Average Power Laser WorkshopUniversity of Wisconsin
Location: Outside Tech transfer centerSeptember 24 & 25, 2003
Posters should be left up during the entire workshop to promote spontaneous,unstructured discussions
Poster Presenter Affiliation (leadauthor)
Poster Title
M. Andersen, S.Sharafat, and N.Ghoniem
UCLA 3D Transient Thermo-Mechanical Analysis ofTungsten Foam
Shawn R. McNeal Ultramet Refractory, Open-Cell Structural Foams forThermal Control Applications
David V. Rose Mission ResearchCorporation
Large-area electron-beam-diode modeling for KrFLaser IFE
Glenn Romanoski ORNL Tungsten coating of low activation ferritic alloy
FarrokhNajmabadi
UCSD Chamber dynamics experiments and data
Zoran Dragojlovic UCSD Chamber clearing code results
Charles Gentile PPPL Hibachi Window Development
Edmund Hsieh,Brian Motta, KellyYoungblood andTom Walsh
SchaferCorporation
Al Coated SiC Mirrors for Final Optics
W. Kowbel MER Corporation SiC-SiC Composite Optics For IFE Applications
Robert Peterson LANL/Wisconsin Yield Modeling for BUCKY
V. Novak, D.Sadowski, S.Shin, K.Schoonover, andS. Abdel-Khalik
Georgia Institute ofTechnology
Experimental and Numerical Study of Mist Coolingfor the Electra Hibachi
J. Niederhaus, M.Anderson, J.Oakley, and R.Bonazza
University ofWisconsin
Experimental and Computational Study of Shock-Induced turbulent Mixing on ICF Target
J. Yuan and G.Moses
University ofWisconsin
Building Tools for Atomic data Calculations
T. Renk and C.Olson
Sandia NationalLaboratory
Material Exposure Data from RHEPP
Andy Bayamian LLNL Front end design for full Mercury laser system
WEDNESDAY, SEP 24, 2003 (CONT)
LUNCH-- Tong Auditorium, Engineering Centers Building
11:45 - 12:45 Lunch and Tour Information All
GROUP PHOTO and TOURS
12:45-1:00 Group Photo(Outside Engineering Centers Building)
All
1:00 - 2:00 TOUR of Wisconsin IEC, Shock Tube andPegasus Experiment
All
TARGET FABRICATION & INJECTION (Session chairman TBA)(Discussion deferred to Target Survival Workshop)
2:00 - 2:25(25)
GA Target Fabrication Progress - D. Goodin (GA)
2:25 - 2:45(20)
Divinyl Benzene (DVB) shells foam buckle pressure & uniformity
D, Schroen (Schafer)J. Streit (Schafer)
2:45 –3:10(25)
Solid DT Studies… What limits DT layering times over foam
J. Hoffer (LANL)
3:10 - 3:40(30)
Thoughts on target fabrication issues for IFE D. Harding (U RochLLE)
3:40 – 4:00(20)
Status of Target Injector and In-Chamber Tracking, R. Petzoldt (GA)
4:00 - 4:15(15)
Update on Target heating calculations R. Raffray (UCSD)
BREAK/Poster Session-- outside tech transfer auditorium
4:15 –5:00(45)
Posters will be up for entire workshop All
TARGET SURVIVAL WORKSHOP- Rm 1045, Engineering Centers Building
4:30 – 6:00(90)
Starts before afternoon poster session ends All
RECEPTION—19th Floor of Van Hise Hall-1220 Linden Drive
6:00 – 7:45 Light Hors d'Oeurves, no host bar All
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2003NOTE EA RLIER STAR T TI ME T ODAY !!
INTRODUCTION
7:30 - 8:00 Coffee, pastries, bagels, etc All
CHAMBERS (Session chairman TBA)
8:00 – 8:30(30)
University of Wisconsin Chambers work G. Moses (Wisc)
8:30 - 8:50(20)
SPARTAN Chamber Clearing code Z. Dragojlovic (UCSD)
8:50 – 9:15(25)
Chamber Experiments with MCFOT F. Najmabadi (UCSD)
9:15 –9:30(15)
CHAMBERS DISCUSSIONS All
BREAK/ Poster Session--Tong Auditorium, Engineering Centers Bldg
9:30 –9:45(15)
Posters will be up for entire workshop All
FIRST WALL- 1 (Session Chairman TBA)+ “x” is time allotted for questions/discussion
9:45- 10:00(10 + 5)
Introduction--Concept & capsule summary of battle plan
J. Sethian (NRL)
10:00-10:15(10 + 5)
Logistics for publishing our work on Solid First Wallfor Laser IFE:
Special issue in Journal of Nuclear Materials Dedicated session in ANS proceedings in FST
N. Ghoneim (UCLA)L. Snead (ORNL)J. Blanchard (Wisc)
10:15-10:45(25 + 5)
Armor modeling and design R. Raffray (UCSD)/S. O’Dell (PPI, Inc)
10:45-11:15(25 + 5)
Foam armor design N. Ghoneim (UCLA)S. Sharfat (UCLA)
11:15 - 11:45(25 +5)
Bonding monolithic and engineered tungsten tolow activation ferritic and thermal stability ofinterface
Thermal conductivity of foams Status of providing common materials Helium Management through solids
L. Snead (ORNL)
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2003 (CONT)
LUNCH
11:45 - 12:45 Tong Auditorium, Engineering Centers Building All
FIRST WALL- 2 (Session Chairman TBA)
12:45 - 1:25(35 + 5)
Exposures of candidate FW materials RHEPP (ions)-many cyclesSupporting modeling.
C. Olson (SNL) 5T. Renk (SNL) 17R. Peterson (LANL)13
1:25 - 1:50(20 + 5)
Long term exposure of candidate FW materials XAPPER (x-rays)
J. Latkowski (LLNL)
1:50 - 2:05(13 + 2)
Progress in use of IEC for helium retention studies B. Cipiti (WISC)J. Kulcinski (WISC)
2:05 - 2:25(15 + 5)
Long term issues Modeling thermo-mechanical fatigue Measure mass loss
J. Blanchard (Wisc)
2:25 - 2:35(10)
“Ground rules” for system studies R. Raffray (UCSD)W. Meier (LLNL)
2:35 - 2:55(20)
System studies progress R. Raffray (UCSD)
2:55 - 3:15(20)
System studies progress W. Meier (LLNL)
3:15 - 3:30 Workshop Wrap upNext meeting date and location
J. Sethian
Agenda for Target Survival Workshop(as part of High Average Power Laser Program Workshop)
Room 1045, Engineering Centers Building, 1550 Engineering DriveUniversity of Wisconsin
4:30-6:00 pmWednesday September 24, 2003
(5) Introduction and workshop goals D. Goodin (GA)R. Raffray (UCSD)
Report on Action Items(5-10) 1. Evaluate the insulating foam target for stability (both
uniformly dense and graded).D. Colombant (NRL)
(5-10) 2. Look up data on a "graded density" foams and see ifthis could be feasible.
D. Schroen (Schafer)
(5-10) 3. Confirm that a uniform DT vapor region thicknessbelow the outer seal (of about 3 m) is acceptable and,in the case of non-uniform heating provide guidanceon how much variation is acceptable between thethickness of the vapor regions on opposite ends of thetarget (i.e. corresponding to the highest and lowestheat fluxes).
D. Colombant (NRL)
(5-10) 4. Evaluate how much temperature drop there is to keepthe insulated target cold (with beta decay heat) anddetermine how beneficial this temperature drop is withrespect to survival estimates.
R. Raffray (UCSD)
(5-10) 5 (a). Evaluate the effect of asymmetric heating in particularon local phase change behavior.
R. Raffray (UCSD)
(5-10) 5 (b). Summarize phase change results from new model forthe thermo-mechanical behavior of the target.
R. Raffray (UCSD)
(5-10) 6. Evaluate whether the insulated target with an outerseal that is permeable could actually be filled and"dryed" of DT in the outer foam.
R. Petzoldt (GA)
(5-10) 7) Measure the compressive strength of DT/foam atrelevant temperatures.
J. Hoffer (LANL)
(5-10) 8) (a). Investigate possibility of layering at lowertemperature (18, 17, 16 K) to provide a means ofaccommodating higher heat fluxes during injection.
J. Hoffer (LANL)
(5-10) 8 (b). Assess the effect of the correspondingly lower gaspressure on the target physics.
D. Colombant (NRL)
(10-15) Discussion and future work R. Raffray (UCSD)D. Goodin (GA)
top related