using “new technologies” to new technologies address “old ...€¦ · • midland bull test...

Post on 24-Oct-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

  • T.DelCurto,MontanaStateUniversity June20,2019

    2019BIFSymposium,EmergingTechnologies,Brookings,S.D. 1

    Using “New Technologies” to Address “Old” Beef Production

    Questions

    T.DelCurtoProfessor&NancyCameron

    ChairRangeBeefCa;leNutriton&

    Management

    2019BeefImprovementFederaFonMeeFngs

    Brookings,SouthDakota

    NewTechnologies•   GROWSAFEInc.

    –  Standardintechnologyforevalua3ngindividualanimalintake&intakebehavior

    –  StandardequipmentatmanyUSDA/LandGrantUniversi3es

    •   MSUCampus(18beef,8sheep)andMSUNARC(32)–   Industryexamples:

    •   MidlandBullTest(Montana)•   SimplotGrandviewFeedlot

    NewTechnologies(cont’):•   C-LockInc.(SmarMeedSystems;RapidCity,SD)

    –  Rela3velynewentrytomeasuringfeedintakeandfeedintakebehavior

    –  Developingequipmentforuniquechallenges/opportuni3es

    •   MyMontanaStateUniversityexperience–  Measureself-fedsupplementintakeinremoteloca3ons–   Nopower,nointernet,severeenvironment

    •   Interestedinprecisionnutri3onandapplica3ontocommercialbeefcaTleproduc3on

    BeefCa;leFeedIntake•  Wellestablishedinbackgrounding/feederscenarios:

    •   NotwellestablishedforCow/calfproducWon:–  Limitedinforma3onforcowsandevenlessforgrazingcowsonpastureorrangelands

    –  Previously,researchwasdifficultandcontainednumeroussourcesoferror

    StrategicSupplementaFonOpFmizestheUseofLow-QualityForages

    •   PastResearch

  • T.DelCurto,MontanaStateUniversity June20,2019

    2019BIFSymposium,EmergingTechnologies,Brookings,S.D. 2

    CowEfficiency•   InwesternproducWonsystems:

    •   ReproducWonisthe#1cullingcriteria

    •   Otherfactors:•   ProducWon

    •   %ofbodyweightweaned“..Cowsshouldwean50%oftheirbodyweight..“

    IdealCowSize? IdealCowSize?RecentPopularPressPublicaFons:!  UniversityofWyoming!  NorthDakotaStateUniversity!  PastpublicaWons

    *Implythatsmallercowsaremoreefficientthanlargercows

    EnergyrequirementsversusBodySize:-   Smalleranimalshavehighermetabolicratesthanlarger

    animals.

    -   Likelyduetofactorssuchas:-   Thermo-regulaWonandbodysize-   MaintenancefuncWonsrequiredforallanimals,but

    proporWonallygreaterforsmallanimals

    -   EnergyMetabolismandBodySize:-  EnergyrequirementsareproporWonaltobodyweightraisedto

    the.75power

    -  ThisisthebasistoexpressingintakeasafuncWonofBW*.75

    - VanSoest(NutriFonalEcologyofRuminants)

    Land & Forage Resources in the Western US

  • T.DelCurto,MontanaStateUniversity June20,2019

    2019BIFSymposium,EmergingTechnologies,Brookings,S.D. 3

    Problem&Jus;fica;on•   Useoffall&winterforageswillincrease:

    –   EconomicalalternaWvetoharvestedforages–  Allowsforincreaseduseofrangelandsoutsideofthegrowingseason

    –   Extendedgrazingseasons(decreasedconfinementfeeding)mayhavephysiologicalbenefits

    –   BUT,opWmaluseofhigh-fiber,low-quality,forages•   Caelewillbeselectedforenvironmental“fit”•   NewtechnologieswillassistinrefiningexisWngknowledgeofstrategicsupplementaWon

    Current/FutureResearch•  StrategicSupplementaWon

    -   OpWmalnutrientdeliverysystems-   OpWmaluseofLow-QualityForages-   OpWmaluseofRangelands

    WinterGrazingResearchatHavre-Winterof2016/2017and2017/2018

    "  InfluenceofSupplementIntakeandCowAgeonGrazingBehaviorandRangelandUsePaeerns"  SamWyffels,JanBowman,LanceMcNew,DarrinBoss,CoryParsons,JuliaDafoe,AlysonHicks-Lynch,andTimDelCurto" VegetaWon:producWonandcoverbyspecies,foragequality,robelstructureesWmates

    "  Soilorganicmaeer,temperaturemaps(GISLayers)

    FeedingBoutData•   45d(yr1)&60d(yr2):

    –   42,472visitsyr1&65,873yr2

    •   CowEIDread•   Timeofday•   Entryandexitarerecorded

    •   CoupledwithweatherstaWonandGPScollardata

    –   AvgSuppleIntake=2.75lbs(1.25kg)

    –   264/272(yr1)and302/306(yr2)cowswererecorded

    Figure1.TheinfluenceofcowageonsupplementintakeandvariaFoninintake.Ageclass1=yearlingheifers,ageclass2=2&3yrcows,ageclass3=4&5yrcows,ageclass4=6&7yrcows,ageclass5=8&9yrcows,andageclass6=10&older(Wyffelsetal.,2018).

    Year1=2016/2017 Year2=2017/2018

    Figure2.Theinfluenceofenvironmentandcowageonsupplementintakebehavior.Best-Fitmodelinvolvedmeandailytemperatureandcowage(Wyffelsetal.,2018).

  • T.DelCurto,MontanaStateUniversity June20,2019

    2019BIFSymposium,EmergingTechnologies,Brookings,S.D. 4

    Goals&Objec;ves

    II.   MatchingBeefCa;leProducFontoWesternRangelandEnvironments

    1.   InfluenceofMatureCowWeaningWeightRaWosand

    CowSizeonIntakeandGrazingBehavior

    -AlysonWilliamsMSProgram 2.   AbilityofYearlingHeiferResidualFeedIntake(RFI)

    EsWmatestoPredictCowProducWvity,FeedIntakeandGrazingBehavior

    -CoryParsonsPhDProgram

    CowSize&WeaningWtRa;o

    Transl.Anim.Sci.2018.2:S79–S83doi:10.1093/tas/txy044Transl.Anim.Sci.2018.2:S84–S88doi:10.1093/tas/txy045

    Current/FutureResearch•  StrategicSupplementaWon

    -   OpWmalnutrientdeliverysystems-   OpWmaluseofLow-QualityForages-   OpWmaluseofRangelands

    2.   SaltLimitedSupplementIntake:ImpactsofSaltLevel,Frequency,andFormofSupplementonIntake,NutrientDiges;on,andVariabilityofSupplementIntakeinBeefCaSleHayley White MS program

    IntakeVariaWonStudy:•   Approximately60crossbredheifers•   ComparingintakeandintakevariaWonbetween

    twoformsofsalt-limitedsupplement,pelletedorloose,usingSmartFeedProTrailer.

    •   3TreatmentGroups:1.   Control(nosupplement)2.   Pelletedform3.   Looseform

    •   HeiferswillbeweighedandbodycondiWonscoredondays0,42,and84.Individualdrymaeersupplementintake,frequencyoffeedevents,andtotalnumberoffeedeventswillbemeasuredforeachheifer.

    RedBluffProject•   Usenewprototypefeeder•   LoteknewprototypeGPSCollars

    •   OBJECTIVES:–  WinterenvironmenteffectsonvegetaWonchange

    –  Resourceusepaeerns

    RedBluffResearch(cont’)•   Long-TermEffectsofProteinStatusonWinterGrazingBeefCows

    -   Treatments 1.non-supplementedcontrolcows 2.1.5kgofAlfalfaPellets 3.3.0kgofAlfalfaPellets

    -   DESIGN:-   150hdofdrypregnantmaturecows-   FeedSupplementslateNovembertomid-February- Threeyearstudy

  • T.DelCurto,MontanaStateUniversity June20,2019

    2019BIFSymposium,EmergingTechnologies,Brookings,S.D. 5

    EnvironmentandNutrientRequirements•   Mostofthemodelsforenvironment

    arebasedon1981NRCPublicaWon

    •   Mostarefocusedonenergyrequirements•   Protein,minerals&vitamins?

    •   Relatetotemperatureandhaircoat•   LimitedinrespecttoprecipitaWon

    and/orwindcondiWons•   WindChillequivalent?

    Valida;onStudyNeeds:1.   Howdoes“stockingrate”influencesupplementintakebehavior?2.   Howdoessupplementdeliverymethodinfluencesupplementintakebehavior?

    •   SmartFeedProandSuperSmartFeedsystemsaredifferent3.EffecWvenessoffeederstolimitand/ormorepreciselydeliversupplementsinextensive

    environments.

    ThankYou!

    Ques;ons?

    ResearchSupportNancyCameronEndowment

    Cow Milking lbofmilk/ lbTDN lbCP

    Size Level cow/day Needed Needed

    1000 BelowAvg 10 12.4 1.9

    1000 Average 20 14.8 2.6

    1000 AboveAvg 30 17.2 3.5

    1200 BelowAvg 10 13.8 2.1

    1200 Average 20 16.2 2.8

    1200 AboveAvg 30 18.7 3.5

    1400 BelowAvg 10 15.2 2.3

    1400 Average 20 17.6 3.0

    1400 AboveAvg 30 20.1 3.7

    Source:NutrientRequirementsofBeefCa;le;1984,1996&2016.

    BeefCa;leNutriFonalRequirements: FinalThoughts:•   BeefCa;leEfficiencyisprimarilydefinedbyreproducFon

    •   OpFmalsizedependsonenvironment•   MetricsforEnvironmental“Fit”arelimited

top related