images.nature.com · web viewunits of parasitology and human microbiome, bambino gesù...
Post on 27-May-2018
212 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Large-scale comparative metagenomics of Blastocystis, a common member of the human
gut microbiome
Running title: Metagenomic analysis of human Blastocystis
Francesco Beghini 1,*, Edoardo Pasolli 1,*, Tin Duy Truong 1, Lorenza Putignani 2, Simone M.
Cacciò 3,^, Nicola Segata 1,^
1. Centre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, Trento 38123 Italy
2. Units of Parasitology and Human Microbiome, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital and
Research Institute, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, Rome 00165 Italy
3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299,
Rome 00161 Italy
* Equal contribution.
^ Corresponding authors: nicola.segata@unitn.it, simone.caccio@iss.it
1
Supplementary Tables and Figures
Supplementary Table 1 (see uploaded file). Statistics for the nine considered reference
genomes coming from eight different STs. Numbers refer to original genomes and after-screening
genomes. Screening was devoted to remove potential bacterial and archaeal contamination.
Supplementary Table 2 (see uploaded file). Prevalence for each Blastocystis subtype in every
category considered in Figure 1.
Supplementary Table 3 (see uploaded file). Breadth of coverage and relative abundance of
Blastocystis in subjects infected over two timepoints.
Supplementary Table 4 (see uploaded file). Statistics for the 43 genomes associated with
different STs reconstructed from the metagenomes.
Supplementary Table 5 (see uploaded file). Description of the 795 ST-specific KOG functions,
which were determined after statistical significance testing with false-discovery rate correction. The
table reports the KOG functions with an adjusted p-value less than 0.2.
Supplementary Table 6 (see uploaded file). p-values associated with the statistical significance
test aimed at finding association between Blastocystis presence and other organisms of the
microbiome.
2
Supplementary Figure 1. Analysis on semi-synthetic data revealed that Blastocystis is detected
through the developed methodology when present at a concentration as low as 0.03% in typical
metagenomic samples of 50M reads.
4
Supplementary Figure 3. p-values associated with the statistical significance test aimed at finding
prevalence of specific STs in different continents. "-" denotes non-statistical significance.
6
Supplementary Figure 4. GC-content of the reconstructed genomes associated with the four most
prevalent ST types.
7
Supplementary Figure 5. Heatmap reporting the ST- specific KOG functions. Further details on
these KOG functions are reported in Supplementary Table 5.
8
Supplementary Figure 6. The LEfSe analysis conducted on all the taxonomic levels extends the
results reported in Figure 6E. Several microorganisms are statistically associated (α = 0.05) with
Blastocystis presence at high effect size (threshold at 3.3). These include Clostridiales and
Firmicutes that are associated with the presence of Blastocystis whereas Bacteroides and
Proteobacteria tend to be more associated with its absence.
9
Supplementary Figure 7. Additional results than those reported in Figure 6A-D shows that the
presence (or absence) of Blastocystis is associated with major differences in the intestinal
microbiome.
11
Supplementary Figure 8. Gini-Simpson and Shannon indexes were considered to estimate the
alpha diversity in each dataset under the condition of absence (in red) or presence (in green) of
Blastocystis. Only in one case (reported with the blue asterisk) we observed statistical significance
between the two conditions.
12
Supplementary Figure 9: False discovery rate plot. The two plots show the average subtypes
detected at a given value of breadth of coverage. The distribution goes from seven (all the STs in
addition to the dominant one) to one (only the dominant ST detected), but it is already plateauing at
10% breadth of coverage confirming that such value does not produce false positives.
13
top related