visibility and visual impact of off-shore wind turbinesvisual impact assessment. overall benefits of...
Post on 07-Mar-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
www.edrcompanies.com 1
Visibility and Visual Impact of Off-Shore Wind Turbines
Great Lakes Wind Energy Development in New York State
www.edrcompanies.com 2
Turbine Components
Tower - Tubular steel structure. Typically 70-100 meters tall
Rotor - 3 Blades spinning at approximately 10-20 RPM. Typically 80-100+ meters in diameter
Nacelle - Generally rectangular. Approximately 10 meters long, 3 meters wide, and 3 meters tall
Total Height - 120-150 Meters (390-490 ft)
545’
436’
327’
218’
109’
413’ rotor diameter
ELEV 0’
www.edrcompanies.com 3
www.edrcompanies.com 4
Turbines in the Landscape
• Very tall structures• Moving rotor• Multiple turbines within a project• These factors result in a high level of visibility in most locations
www.edrcompanies.com 5
Turbines in the Landscape
• High visibility does not always equate to adverse visual impact.
• Based on public reaction to existing projects, wind turbines are not viewed in the same way as other highly visible infrastructure projects.
Communications Tower Power Plant Wind Power Facility
www.edrcompanies.com 6
Turbines in the Landscape
Turbines can be perceived as compatible with certain landscapes
Especially working agricultural landscapes
www.edrcompanies.com 7
Turbines in the Landscape
In other settings, turbines may appear more out of character.
Wooded Ridge Tops Off Shore Facilities
www.edrcompanies.com 8
Factors Affecting Turbine VisibilityTurbine Color
Not many options. Typically white or off-white: Works well under most conditions.
Clear Partly Cloudy
Overcast
www.edrcompanies.com 9
Factors Affecting Turbine VisibilityProximity to viewer
www.edrcompanies.com 10
Factors Affecting Turbine VisibilityProximity to viewer
Offshore projects are relatively far away from most viewers
www.edrcompanies.com 11
Front - Lighting Back - Lighting
Factors Affecting Turbine VisibilityLighting Conditions
www.edrcompanies.com 12
Clear Skies Hazy Skies
Factors Affecting Turbine VisibilityWeather Conditions
www.edrcompanies.com 13
Generally an unavoidable adverse visual impact, but can be minimized
Late Afternoon Early Evening
Twilight Night
Factors Affecting Turbine VisibilityFAA Lighting
www.edrcompanies.com 14
Visual Impact Assessment Process
• InventoryofVisual/SensitiveResources
• AnalysisofPotentialProjectVisibility
• AccurateIllustrationofProject
• VisualImpactAssessment
www.edrcompanies.com 15
Inventory of Visually Sensitive Resources
• DefinedbyNYSDECVisualPolicy
• Historicsites
• Parkandrecreationalfacilities
• State/Federallydesignatedresources
• Areasofhighintensitylanduse
www.edrcompanies.com 16
Analysis of Potential Project VisibilityViewshed Analysis
• Canevaluatealargearea:5-10MilesTypically
• Usedtohelpdefineareasthatrequireadditionalstudy
• Worstcaseanalysis:basedontopographyonly
• Limitedvalueforshorelineareas
www.edrcompanies.com 17
Analysis of Potential Project VisibilityShoreline Visibility Study
NORTH
July 2006
Prepared By:Figure 3.12-5 - Shoreline Visibility Study
Potential Project Visibility Within Defi ned Distance Buffers
Cape Wind Energy Project
Cape Cod, Nantucket, and Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts
- 0-6 Mile BufferLegend:
- 6-12 Mile Buffer
- 12-18 Mile Buffer
- Proposed Project Boundary
- Nantucket Sound Facing Shoreline
- Nantucket Sound Facing Shoreline with Potential Views to Project Site
www.edrcompanies.com 18
Analysis of Potential Project VisibilitySeascape Horizon Study
NORTH
July 2006
Prepared By:Seascape Horizon Study
Figure 1 - Sheet 4 of 14 - Hyannis Port, Barnstable
Cape Wind Energy Project
Cape Cod, Nantucket, and Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts
- Cone of Potentially Visible Seascape Horizon
- Cone of Potentially Visible Turbines within Seascape Horizon
www.edrcompanies.com 19
Analysis of Potential Project VisibilityField Evaluation/Documentation
www.edrcompanies.com 20
• Shouldhaveadefinedselectionprocess
• NeedstoberepresentativeofLandscapeSimilarityZones
• Needstoshowprojectfromvariousdistancesanddirections
• Shouldillustratedifferentambientlightingconditions
• Shouldincludesensitivesitesandareasoflocalconcern
Accurate Illustration of ProjectSelection of Viewpoints
www.edrcompanies.com 21
• Only defensible way to create photo simulations
• Useproposedturbinespecificationsandcoordinates
• Useviewpointdataobtainedduringfieldwork(knowthelimitsofitsaccuracy)
• Modelsneedtobeaccurateandshouldincludeallproposedprojectcomponents
• Materials/colorshouldmatchthoseofproposedaction
• Allsupportdatacanbemadeavailableuponrequest
Accurate Illustration of ProjectComputer Modeled Simulations
www.edrcompanies.com 22
Accurate Illustration of ProjectSimulation Methodology
Photos are selected to illustrate typical views of the proposed project that will be available torepresentativeviewer/usergroupsfromrepresentativeshorelinesettings
www.edrcompanies.com 23
Accurate Illustration of ProjectSimulation Methodology
A three-dimensional computer model of the project is built based on proposed turbine specificationsandtowersitecoordinates
www.edrcompanies.com 24
Accurate Illustration of ProjectSimulation Methodology
Aerial photographs, survey (Total Station) data, and sub-meter accuracy GPS data col-lectedinthevicinityoftheviewpointsareusedtoalignthephotowiththe3Dmodel
www.edrcompanies.com 25
Accurate Illustration of ProjectSimulation Methodology
Blow-up of the camera location and alignment points documented with the sub-meter accuracy GPS and Total Station
www.edrcompanies.com 26
Accurate Illustration of ProjectSimulation Methodology
These data are superimposed over photographs from each of the viewpoints, and minor camera changes are made to align all known reference points within the view
www.edrcompanies.com 27
Accurate Illustration of ProjectSimulation Methodology
Theforegroundstakesareremovedandtheproposedexteriorcolor/finishoftheturbinesisthenaddedtothemodel.Theappropriatesunangleissimulatedbasedonthespecificdate, time and location at which each photo was taken
www.edrcompanies.com 28
Visual Impact Assessment
www.edrcompanies.com 29
Visual Impact Assessment
www.edrcompanies.com 30
• Analysisisscientific:Canberepeatedandchecked
• Conclusionsbasedondefensibleanalysis
• Canhelpdefineifmitigationisnecessaryandeffective
• Superiortothe“judgeforyourself”approach
Visual Impact AssessmentOverall Benefits of VIA Process
www.edrcompanies.com 31
• Commonconcernonmostwindprojectsincludingproposedoff-shoreprojects
• Concerngenerallyfocusedonpropertieswithin2milesofturbines
• Relatestopotentialvisual,noise,shadowflickerandsleepdisturbanceeffects
Effect on Property Values
www.edrcompanies.com 32
• RenewableEnergyPolicyProject(REPP),2003
• RoyalInstituteofCharteredSurveyers,2007
• Hoenetal.,2009
Effect on Property Values
Three most commonly cited studies:
Most recent study:
• Hinman,2010
All these studies involved statistical analysis of real estate data, and all concluded that operating wind farms do not have an adverse impact on property values
www.edrcompanies.com 33
• Noneofthepreviousstudiesaddressedoff-shoreprojects
• Limitedinformation-allfromEurope
• PositivereactionincoastalresortcommunitiesinDenmarkwithviewsoftheHornsRevproject
Effect on Property Values
(Leaning, 2003)
Image courtesy of www.hornsrev.dk
www.edrcompanies.com 34
Effect on Property Values
Citations
Firestone, J. and W. Kempton. 2007. Public Opinion about Large Offshore Wind Power: Underlying Factors. Energy Policy 35(3): 1584-98.
Hinman, Jennifer L. 2010. Wind Farm Proximity and Property Values: A Pooled Hedonic Regression Analysis of Property Values in Central Illinois.Availableat:http://renewableenergy.illinoisstate.edu/wind/publications/2010%20Wind%20Farm%20Proximity%20and%20Property%20Values.pdf.May2010.
Hoen, B., R. Wiser, P. Cappers, M. Thayer, and G. Sethi. 2009. The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values in the United States: A Multi-Site Hedonic Analysis.Availableat:http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/lbnl-2829e.pdf.December2009.
Leaning, J. 2003. Danes extol wind farm. Cape Cod Times. Published: November 11, 2003.
Renewable Energy Policy Project (REPP). 2003. The Effect of Wind Development on Local Property Values. Availableat:http://www.repp.org/articles/static/1/binaries/wind_online_final.pdf.May2003.
Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). 2007. What is the impact of wind farms on house prices? Availableat:http://www.rics.org/site/download_feed.aspx?fileID=3524&fileExtension=PDF.February2007.
top related