what science says about key …nas-sites.org/emergingscience/files/2016/09/yeo.pdf6 o what science...
Post on 17-Jul-2020
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
WHAT SCIENCE SAYS ABOUT KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMMUNICATION
Sara K. Yeo
Department of Communication
University of Utah
sara.yeo@utah.edu
Personal Environmental Exposure Measurements:
Making Sense and Making Use of Emerging Capabilities
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
November 16, 2016
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
THIS TALK
Setting the stage…
science, scientists, and media
Impacts of communication on attitudes and perceptions
the rise of a new type of scientist…
and citizen scientists
Key considerations for communication and engagement
2
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
3
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
A NEW MEDIA ENVIRONMENT
4
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
A NEW MEDIA ENVIRONMENT
5
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
PEOPLE ARE INCREASINGLY MOVINGONLINE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION
National Science Board. (2016). Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
6
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
@sarakyeo 7
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
SOME DETERRENTS…
Historical and traditional norms
stigmatization
Absence of clear career benefits
insufficient incentives
communication for second-rate researchers
Lack of training
8
Yeo, S. K., & Brossard, D. (forthcoming). The Changing Nature of Scientist-Media Interactions: A Cross-
National Analysis. In K. H. Jamieson, D. A. Scheufele, & D. M. Kahan (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the
Science of Science Communication.
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
SOME MOTIVATIONS…
Intrinsic rewards
enjoyment
feelings of contributing
fulfilling a sense of responsibility
Extrinsic factors
increasing visibility, reputation, funding
9
Yeo, S. K., & Brossard, D. (forthcoming). The Changing Nature of Scientist-Media Interactions: A Cross-
National Analysis. In K. H. Jamieson, D. A. Scheufele, & D. M. Kahan (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the
Science of Science Communication.
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
10
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
SOCIAL MEDIA CAN AMPLIFYEFFECTS OF TRADITIONAL MEDIA
11
Liang, X., Su, L. Y.-F., Yeo, S. K., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., Xenos, M. A., Nealey, P., & Corley, E. A. (2014).
Building buzz: (Scientists) communicating science in new media environments. Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, 91(4), 772–791. doi: 10.1177/1077699014550092
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
THIS TALK
Setting the stage…
science, scientists, and media
Impacts of communication on attitudes and perceptions
the rise of a new type of scientist…
and citizen scientists
Key considerations for communication and engagement
12
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION OF RISKSKasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988).
The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177-187.
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
AMPLIFICATION / ATTENUATIONOF RISKS: AN EXAMPLE
14
Yeo, S. K., Cacciatore, M. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Runge, K., Su, L. Y., Kim, J., Xenos, M., & Corley, E. A. (2014). Partisan
amplification of risk: American perceptions of nuclear energy risk in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Energy Policy, 67, 727-736.
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
MEDIA ATTENUATED RISKSAMONG SOME GROUPS…
15
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
… BUT AMPLIFIED RISKSAMONG OTHER GROUPS
16
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
ONLINE CUES ANDSCIENCE COMMUNICATION
17
Spartz, J. T., Su, L. Y.-F., Griffin, R., Brossard, D., & Dunwoody, S. (2015). YouTube, social norms and perceived salience
of climate change in the American mind. Environmental Communication, 0(0), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1047887
Anderson, A. A., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016). Toxic talk: How online incivility can
undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, edw022. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edw022
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
THE RISE OF A NEWTYPE OF SCIENTIST…
Scientists are increasingly taking to social media
interested audiences
18
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
… AND CITIZEN SCIENTISTS
19http://aircasting.org/
https://mylapka.com/
http://blog.safecast.org/
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
20
http://safecast.org/
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
THE LURE OF RATIONALITY
@sarakyeo 21
Knowledge deficit model
“to know science is to love it”
science literacy
persistent
Some reasons…
1. Trained to be objective
2. Current institutional structures
3. Conceptualizations of “the public”
4. Works well for policy design
Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model
persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science.
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
KEY CONSIDERATIONS FORCOMMUNICATING SCIENCE
Where?
multiple platforms
best fit?
1. Keeping it simple
2. Attracting and retaining attention
3. Using concrete ideas
4. Leveraging credibility
5. The power of narratives
22
Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. New York, NY: Random House.
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
1. KEEPING IT SIMPLE= CORE + COMPACT
23
Isolating the core
“Curse of knowledge”
unknowing what you know
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
THE CURSE OF KNOWLEDGE?
24
Somerville, R. C. J., & Hassol, S. J. (2011). Communicating the science of climate change.
Physics Today, 64(10), 48-53
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
1. KEEPING IT SIMPLE= CORE + COMPACT
25
Isolating the core
“Curse of knowledge”
unknowing what you know
Schema
help non-experts make sense of new information
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
2. AUDIENCE ATTENTION
Capturing and retaining attention
surprise
curiosity
“Information gaps”
what people know what they want to know
curiosity as a motivator
26
Loewenstein, G. F. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin,
116(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
3. CONCRETE & 4. CREDIBLE
Concrete
opinions as “pictures inside our heads”
Credibility
affiliations, institutions
conveying scientific process
27
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
5. USING NARRATIVES
The power of stories…
capture and retain attention
concrete
28
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
5. NARRATIVESLeiserowitz, A. A. (2004). Surveying the impact: The day after tomorrow. Environment, 46(9), 22-44.
29
Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., de França Doria, M., Haynes, K., & Vincent, K. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come?
Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 15(4), 435–457.
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
THE TAKE-AWAYS…
Data-driven communication
goals
audience
1. Simple = core + compact
2. Attention
3. Concrete
4. Credibility
5. Using narratives
30
© Y
eo 2
016
@sa
raky
eo
WHAT SCIENCE SAYS ABOUT KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMMUNICATION
Sara K. Yeo
Department of Communication
University of Utah
sara.yeo@utah.edu
Personal Environmental Exposure Measurements:
Making Sense and Making Use of Emerging Capabilities
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
November 16, 2016
top related