what’s wrong with emergency care in aneurin bevan health board? dr danny antebi & dr julie...

Post on 30-Dec-2015

219 Views

Category:

Documents

5 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

What’s wrong with emergency care in Aneurin Bevan Health Board?

Dr Danny Antebi & Dr Julie Vile

“We have seen an increase in the 85+

age group”

“The acuity of our patients is increasing”

What do we know / think?

TOO MUCH DEMAND

PROCESSES ARE TOO SLOW IN HOSPITAL

LACK OF CAPACITY TO TAKE PATIENTS OUT

OF SYSTEM

“The system is in crisis”

With increased demand, bed cuts and no immediate prospect of additional funding, we need a FUNDAMENTAL change if we hope to deliver a high quality service

Demand for A&E services

Demand by age band

A&E age profile (adults)

A&E outcome – admitted

Hospital profile: co-morbidities

Hospital profile: age & beddays

Projections for 65+ AB residents with dementia

The 4 hour target

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1Ja

n/08

Mar

/08

May

/08

Jul/

08Se

p/08

Nov

/08

Jan/

09M

ar/0

9M

ay/0

9Ju

l/09

Sep/

09N

ov/0

9Ja

n/10

Mar

/10

May

/10

Jul/

10Se

p/10

Nov

/10

Jan/

11M

ar/1

1M

ay/1

1Ju

l/11

Sep/

11N

ov/1

1Ja

n/12

Mar

/12

May

/12

Jul/

12Se

p/12

Nov

/12

95% Target

ABHB Performance

NH Performance

RG Performance

The 8 hour target

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1A

pr/1

0M

ay/1

0Ju

n/10

Jul/

10A

ug/1

0Se

p/10

Oct

/10

Nov

/10

Dec

/10

Jan/

11Fe

b/11

Mar

/11

Apr

/11

May

/11

Jun/

11Ju

l/11

Aug

/11

Sep/

11O

ct/1

1N

ov/1

1D

ec/1

1Ja

n/12

Feb/

12M

ar/1

2A

pr/1

2M

ay/1

2Ju

n/12

Jul/

12A

ug/1

2Se

p/12

Oct

/12

Nov

/12

Dec

/12

ABHB Performance

NH Performance

RG Performance

4 hr Breaches & Death Rate

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0

5

10

15

20

25A

pr/

08

Jun

/08

Au

g/0

8

Oct

/08

De

c/0

8

Fe

b/0

9

Ap

r/0

9

Jun

/09

Au

g/0

9

Oct

/09

De

c/0

9

Fe

b/1

0

Ap

r/1

0

Jun

/10

Au

g/1

0

Oct

/10

De

c/1

0

Fe

b/1

1

Ap

r/11

Jun

/11

Au

g/1

1

Oct

/11

De

c/11

Fe

b/1

2

Ap

r/1

2

Jun

/12

Au

g/1

2

Oct

/12

De

c/1

2 Em

erg

en

cy

A&

E d

ea

th r

ate

by

da

y o

f a

dm

iss

ion

A&

E %

4 h

ou

r b

rea

ch

es

4 hour breaches

Death rate

Ideas for modelling/ alleviating the problem

TOO MUCH DEMAND

PROCESSES ARE TOO SLOW IN HOSPITAL

LACK OF CAPACITY TO TAKE PATIENTS OUT

OF SYSTEM

• Admission avoidance strategies

• Better community model

• Role of WAST

• Consultant at front end

• Alternative pathway for elderly/ frail patients

• Co-locate MIU

• Better computational facilities

•Discharge patients earlier

• Bring in elective patients later

• 24/7 working

• Patient boarding

50%

22%

14%

7%7%

21/03/2013

MAU Assessment

Deferred to Hot Slot

Admission Avoided

Diverted RGH-YYF

Referred Frailty

Ideas for modelling/ alleviating the problem

TOO MUCH DEMAND

PROCESSES ARE TOO SLOW IN HOSPITAL

LACK OF CAPACITY TO TAKE PATIENTS OUT

OF SYSTEM

• Admission avoidance strategies

• Better community model

• Role of WAST

• Consultant at front end

• Alternative pathway for elderly/ frail patients

• Co-locate MIU

• Better computational facilities

•Discharge patients earlier

• Bring in elective patients later

• 24/7 working

• Patient boarding

Choluteca Bridge

The problem

Evidence of repeated escalation, increased clinical incidents, stories of poor care, queues of ambulances.

So… Case for change

Organisational focus

Conceptual framework

Case for change

Internal to health, partners in delivery, public and politicians

Making the case Data Hearts and minds Patient safety

Organisational focus

Leadership

Whole system approach

Prioritise Emergency Care

Safe

Timely

Effective

Efficient

Equitable

Patient Centred

Systemic

Collaborative

Dialogue

Improvement Innovation

Conceptual framework

Flow

Complexity

Networks and Matrices

Flow

Poor flow harms and kills (Kate Sylvester-mortality by day of admission)

Poor flow wastes resources

Demoralises staff

Impacts on other departments

Complicated or complex

Simple - following a recipe

Complicated - building a space rocket First 48 hours CVA, cardiac surgery

Complex - raising a child Chronic conditions, plus dementia plus NOF

Slide on differences

Production lines and pathways

Acute chest pain Expertise, latest equipment, excellent process, minimal collaboration, safe environment

Complicated pathway/Organisational ownership

Chronic cardiac failure and cognitive impairment

Stay at home, response, support, advice when I need it, a lot of collaboration, engage my family, friends and the milkman, occasional high tech

Complex approach/Shared ownership

Networks and matrices

Resilient communities

public/private/3rd sector – with a shared agenda and priority

? integration IT, budgets, management

Research and modelling

Flow - patient safety, risk, right person, right place, right time, right expertise, pull not push

Complexity – process measures less outcome measures, dignity, patients who can’t report

Networks – organisational collaboration, resilient and robust community and primary care, risk assessment and management, EOL/anticipatory care.

Thank you for listening!

Email:Danny.antebi@wales.nhs.ukjulie.vile@wales.nhs.uk

Any questions?

top related