www.fitzpatrickcella.com use of prior statements, depositions and corollary proceedings: searing...
Post on 14-Dec-2015
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
Use of Prior Statements, Depositions and Corollary Proceedings: Searing Impeachment and Effective Rehabilitation
FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY
Henry J. Renk, Esq.Partner
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
2
Impeachment of a Witness
“To call into question the veracity of a witness, by means of evidence adduced for such purpose, or the adducing of proof that a witness is unworthy of belief.”
Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed. 1990)
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
3
Rehabilitation of a Witness
“After cross examination, a witness whose credibility has suffered may be examined again (redirect examination) to improve his standing with the trier of fact in matters covered on cross examination.”
Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed. 1990)
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
4
IMPEACHMENT
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
5
Any Witness Can Be Impeached (Rule 607)
• Your Own Live Witness
• Adverse Live Witness
• Out-of-Court Declarant
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
6
Timing Of Impeachment
• Your Own Witness: At Any Time
• Adverse Witnesses: Usually on Cross-Examination
• Out-of-Court Declarant: Whenever Credibility Attacked
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
7
Impeachment Techniques
1) Attacking witnesses’s character• e.g., through prior bad acts or prior convictions
2) Demonstrating Bias• e.g., what motivation does the witness have?
3) Demonstrating Sensory Deficiencies• e.g., could they really see what happened?
4) Use of Prior Inconsistent Statements• e.g., previous statements that now contradict
their trial testimony
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
8
Types of Prior Statements for Use in Impeachment• Testimony:
• Statements Under Oath:
• Statements Not Under Oath:
• Litigation Documents:
– Deposition or Trial– U.S. or Foreign Litigation– P.T.O. Testimony
– Affidavits or Declarations– P.T.O. Sworn Papers
– Internal Company Records– Publications by Witnesses– P.T.O. Papers
– Discovery Responses, Expert Reports, Etc. . .
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
9
Rules of Evidence - Impeaching With Prior Inconsistent Statements
• Rule 613: Prior Statements of Witnesses
• Relaxes common-law foundation requirements
• Show statement to opposing counsel upon request
• When proving prior statement through extrinsic evidence:
– Witness must be given chance to explain/deny
– N/A to admission by party opponent [Rule 613(b)]
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
10
Rules of Evidence - Impeaching With Prior Inconsistent Statements (cont.)
• FRE 806: Attacking and Supporting Credibility of Declarant
• Allows for impeachment (or rehabilitation) using out-of-court statement against declarant
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
11
Impeachment Technique Using Prior Inconsistent Statement
•Step 1: Recommit Witness to His/Her Direct Testimony
•Step 2: Validate the Prior Statement• e.g., Establish when/how prior statement was made• Authenticate prior statement• If prior statement is more valuable demonstrate
that it is the more accurate of the two statements.
•Step 3:Confront the Witness with the Prior Statement• Leave no room for evasion or argument by witness
re: statement inconsistencies
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
12
Impeaching Experts
• Rules 702 – 705
• To question soundness of opinions
• Opportunity to contrast multiple experts
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
13
Impeaching Out-of-Court Declarant
• Only When Statement Offered for Its Truth
• Can Use Inconsistent Statement Made At Any Time (vs. Requirement of Prior Inconsistency for Live Witness)
• Inconsistency Must be Independently Admissible
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
14
Practical Considerations Regarding Impeachment
Practice Tip 1:
Don’t overuse the weapon of impeachment
– Use sparingly– Save for key fact(s)
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
15
Practical Considerations Regarding Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 2:
Make sure the trier of fact understands the impeachment
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
16
Practical Considerations Regarding Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 3:
Make sure the impeachment is consistent with theory of your case
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
17
Practical Considerations Regarding Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 4:
Impeach only when success is probable- i.e., only where inconsistency clear
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
18
Practical Considerations Regarding Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 5:
Do not impeach on information favorable to your case
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
19
Practical Considerations Regarding Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 6:
Consider the witness your are impeaching
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
20
REHABILITATION
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
21
Rules of Evidence Relating to Rehabilitation Using Prior Statements
• FRE 801(d)(1)(B):• Prior consistent statement admissible, but only:
1) After credibility of witness has been attacked
2) To rebut express or implied charge of recent fabrication, improper influence, or bad motive.
3) Prior statement must have been made before corrupting influence or event was present (See, Tome v. United States, 513 U.S. 150 (1995))
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
22
Rules of Evidence Relating to Rehabilitation Using Prior Statements (cont.)
• FRE 806: Attacking and Supporting Credibility of Declarant
• Declarant’s statement admitted in evidence
• Declarant’s credibility attacked
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
23
Practical Considerations Relating to Rehabilitation
Practice Tip 1:
Hit your own witness’s inconsistent statements head on during direct
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
24
Practical Considerations Relating to Rehabilitation (cont.)
Practice Tip 2:
Rehabilitate only where absolutely necessary
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
25
Practical Considerations Relating to Rehabilitation (cont.)
Practice Tip 3:
On redirect refer to adversary’s raising of inconsistent statement
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
26
Practical Considerations Relating to Rehabilitation (cont.)
Practice Tip 4:
Prepare your witness to adequately handle the bad points
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
Thank You
top related