xun (sam) zhou multiple autonomous robotic systems (mars) lab dept. of computer science and...

Post on 14-Jan-2016

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Xun (Sam) Zhou

Multiple Autonomous Robotic Systems (MARS) Lab

Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering

University of Minnesota

Algebraic Geometry inComputer Vision and Robotics

2

Introduction

• Geometric problems widely appear in computer vision/robotics– Visual Odometry– Map-based localization (image/laser scan)– Manipulators

• We need to solve systems of polynomial equations

Stewart Mechanism

3

Outline• Visual odometry with directional correspondence

• Motion-induced robot-to-robot extrinsic calibration

• Optimal motion strategies for leader-follower formations

pC

{F}

{L}{L}

{F}

g

4

Motivation

• Main challenge: data association

• Outlier rejection (RANSAC) least-squares refinement

• Objective: efficient minimal solvers

Min. No. points

Minimize prob. of picking an outlier

5

Related Work• Five points (10 solutions)

– [Nister ’04] • Compute null space of a 5x9 matrix • Gauss elimination of a dense 10x20 matrix• Solve a 10th order polynomial essential matrix• Recover the camera pose from the essential matrix

• Three points and one direction (4 solutions)– [Fraundorfer et al. ’10]

• Similar to the 5-point algorithm w. fewer unknowns• Solve a 4th order polynomial essential matrix

– [Kalantari et al. ’11] • Tangent half-angle formulae• Singularity at 180 degree rotation• Solve a 6th order polynomial (2 spurious solutions)

– Our algorithm• Fast: coefficient of the 4th order polynomial in closed form • Solve for the camera pose directly

6

Problem Formulation

• Directional constraint

• 3 point matches{1} {2}

2-DOF in rotation

1-DOF in rotation2-DOF in translation(scale is unobservable) Objective: determine

7

Determine 2-DOF in Rotation

• Parameterization of R:

• Compute

8

• Problem reformulation

Determine the Remaining 3-DOF

Linear in

System of polynomial equations in

9

• Problem solutionEliminate

Eliminate using Sylvester resultant

Back-substitute to solve for

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

4th order 4 solutions for

Determine the Remaining 3-DOF

10

Simulation Results

• Under image and directional noise – Directional noise (deg):

rotate around random axis

– Report median errors

• Observations– Forward motion out

performs sideway

– Rotation estimate better than translation

[Courtesy of O. Naroditsky, UPenn]

12

Experimental Results

Sample Images

• Setup– Single camera (640x480 pixels, 50 degree FOV)

– Record an 825-frame outdoor sequence, total of 430 m trajectory

– RANSAC: 200 hypotheses for each image pair

• 3p1 has 2 failures, while 5-point has 4 failures

Fail to choose inlier set

[Courtesy of O. Naroditsky, UPenn]

13

Outline• Visual odometry with directional correspondence

• Motion-induced robot-to-robot extrinsic calibration

• Optimal motion strategies for leader-follower formation

pC

{F}

{L}{L}

{F}

g

14

Multi-robot tracking (MARS)

Introduction

• Motivating applications– Cooperative SLAM

– Multi-robot tracking

– Formation flight

Require global/relative

robot pose

Formation Flight (NASA)

Satellite Formation Flight (NASA)

Talisman L (BAE Systems)

Multi-robot tracking (MARS)

15

Multi-robot tracking (MARS)

• Motivating applications– Cooperative SLAM

– Multi-robot tracking

– Formation flight

• Determine relative pose using– External references (e.g., GPS, map)

• Not always available

– Ego motion and robot-to-robot measurements• Distance and/or Bearing• Requires solving systems of nonlinear

(polynomial) equations

• Contributions– Identified 14 minimal problems using combinations of robot-to-robot

measurements (distance and/or bearing)

– Provided closed-form or efficient solutions

Require global/relative

robot pose

Formation Flight (NASA)

Talisman L (BAE Systems)

Talisman L (BAE Systems)

Introduction

16

Problem Description

{2}

{1}

d12

b1

b2

Goal: Determine relative pose (p, C) for robots moving in 3D

pC

• First meet at {1}, {2}, measure subset of {d12, b1, b2 }

17

Problem Description

{2}

{1}

d12

b1

b2

2p4

1p3

{3}

{4}

d34

b3

b4

Goal: Determine relative pose (p, C) for robots moving in 3D

pC

• First meet at {1}, {2}, measure subset of {d12, b1, b2 }

• Then move to {3}, {4}, measure subset of {d34, b3, b4 }

18

Problem Description and Related Work

{2}

{1}

d12

b1

b2

2p4

1p3

{3}

{4}

d34

b3

b4

1p2n-1

2p2n

{2n}

d2n-1, 2n

b2n-1

b2n

{2n-1}

...

Goal: Determine relative pose (p, C) for robots moving in 3D

pC

• First meet at {1}, {2}, measure subset of {d12, b1, b2 }

• Then move to {3}, {4}, measure subset of {d34, b3, b4 }

• Collect at least 6 scalar measurements for determining the 6-DOF relative pose

Homogeneous (Minimal)• 6 distances [Wampler ’96], [Lee & Shim ’03] [Trawny, Zhou, et al. RSS’09]

Homogeneous (Overdetermined)• Distance and/or bearing [Trawny, Zhou, et al. TRO’10]

Stewart Mechanism

19

Homogeneous (Minimal)• 6 distances [Wampler ’96], [Lee & Shim ’03] [Trawny, Zhou, et al. RSS’09]

Homogeneous (Overdetermined)• Distance and/or bearing [Trawny, Zhou, et al. TRO’10]

Heterogeneous (Minimal)(e.g., ) • Our focus

Problem Description and Related Work

{2}

{1}

b1

2p4

1p3

{3}

{4}

d34

b4

1p5

2p6

{6}

d56

{5}

Goal: Determine relative pose (p, C) for robots moving in 3D

pC

• First meet at {1}, {2}, measure subset of {d12, b1, b2 }

• Then move to {3}, {4}, measure subset of {d34, b3, b4 }

• Collect at least 6 scalar measurements for determining the 6-DOF relative pose

20

Combinations of Inter-robot Measurements

4

6

5

1

2

3

No. ofeqns

All possible combinations up to 6 time steps 7^6 =117,649 (overdetermined) problems!

scalar 1 equation 3D unit vector 2 equations

21

Only 14 Minimal Systems

4

6

5

1

2

3

No. ofeqns

[IROS ’10][ICRA ’11][RSS ’09] Sys10

These are formulated as systems of polynomial equations.

22

• Relative position known

• From the distance

• Solve for C from system of equations

System 10:

d12

p

{4}

C

{1}

2p4

1p3

b1

{3}

d78

{2}

{7}

{8}

8 solutions solved by multiplication matrix

2p8

1p7

d34 ...

23

Methods for Solving Polynomial Equations

• Elimination & back-substitution

• Multiplication (Action) matrix

Original system Triangular system

MultiplicationMatrix

Eigendecomp.

m solutions

Resultant

Symbolic-Numerical

method

Groebner Basis

24

Multiplication Matrix of a Univariate Polynomial

Monomials in the remainderof any polynomial divided by f

25

Extension to Multivariable Case

26

Solve System 10 by Multiplication Matrix

• Represent rotation by Cayley’s parameter

• Find the Multiplication matrix via Macaulay Resultant

Quadratic in s

Add a linear function:

multiply with some monomials

Arrange polynomials in matrix form:

Eliminate

Read off solutions from eigenvectors

8 basis monomials

27 extra monomials

27

Outline• Visual odometry with directional correspondence

• Motion-induced robot-to-robot extrinsic calibration

• Optimal motion strategies for leader-follower formations

pC

{F}

{L}{L}

{F}

g

28

Optimal Motion Strateges for Leader-Follower Formations

• Vehicles often move in formation

V formation flight [aerospaceweb.org]

Platooning [tech-faq.com]

X. S. Zhou, K. Zhou, S. I. Roumeliotis, Optimized Motion Strategies for Localization in Leader-Follower Formations, IROS 2011. (To appear)

29

Optimal Motion Strateges for Leader-Follower Formations

• Vehicles often move in formation to improve fuel efficiency

• Robot motion affects estimation accuracy

• Next-step optimal motion strategies

• Finding all critical points that satisfy

the KKT optimality conditions

{L}

{F}

In formation, relative pose unobservable

distance, or bearing

Uncertainty unbounded

30

Simulation Results: Range-only • Leader moves on straight line

• Follower desired position

• Initial covariance

• Measurement noise

• MTF: maintaining the formation• CRM: constrained random motion• MME: active control strategy [Mariottini et al.]• GBS: grid-based search • RAM: our relaxed algebraic method

Follower TrajectoryAverage over 50 Monte Carlo trialsAverage over 50 Monte Carlo trials

31

Summary • Algebraic geometric has wide range of applications

• Other projects I have also worked on– Multi-robot SLAM– Vision-aided inertial navigation

Visual Odometry

pC

Motion-induced Extrinsic Calibration

and more …

{F}

{L}Optimal Motion

Xun (Sam) Zhou

Multiple Autonomous Robotic Systems (MARS) Lab

Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering

University of Minnesota

Algebraic Geometry inComputer Vision and Robotics

top related