z. michels, b. tikoff , l. g. medaris, jr. university of wisconsin – madison

Post on 24-Feb-2016

33 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Z. Michels, B. Tikoff , L. G. Medaris, Jr. University of Wisconsin – Madison. Crustal-scale detachment within an accretionary setting, Seiad complex, Rattlesnake Creek terrane, Klamath Mountains. Long-term goals of the research. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Crustal-scale detachment within an accretionary setting, Seiad complex, Rattlesnake Creek

terrane, Klamath Mountains Z. Michels, B. Tikoff, L. G. Medaris, Jr. University of Wisconsin – Madison

How does the relative rheology of mechanically distinct materials at depth influence the development of convergent margins and continental growth?

How variable is the strength architecture of the lower crust in accretionary settings?

Long-term goals of the research

After Bürgmann and Dresen (2008)

? ?

?

?

Tectonic Setting

Adapted from King (1970)

Modified after Irwin (1994), and Snoke and Barnes (2006)

Klamath Mtns

Western US

older

younger

RCT ~164 Ma

Seiad Complex

Higher T

Lower T

detac

hmen

t strik

e

Field Photo

Field Photo

upper detachment surface

Looking west

Looking west

upper detachment

surface

Relict mantle fabrics that survived obduction and burial

Ultramafic rocks that were penetratively deformed

Highly strained marbles, quartzites, metavolcanics

Seiad Architecture

km

wfu

a

msu

SW NE

High strain indicators

Sheath folds in marblesde

tachm

ent s

trike

Top-to-SE Kinematic indicators

SE NW

High strain indicators

Pyroxenite bands in peridotite

Elsewhere along strike…Sheath folds in Peridotites

detac

hmen

t strik

e

West Fork bodyPre-existing fabrics transposed and obliterated in lower peridotite body

Kangaroo bodyUpper mantle fabrics still preserved in the structurally higher peridotite body

Microstructure

EBSD maps acquired at Boston College courtesy of Seth Kruckenberg

Smaller grains, stronger fabric(Higher stress and/or Lower T)

Larger grains, weaker fabric(Lower stress and/or Higher T)

green = olivinecyan = chromiteyellow = opxred = cpx

Higher T

Lower T

-Petrofabric Shapes

Eigenvalue analysis

Point: λ1 > λ2 ≈ λ3

Girdle: λ1 ≈ λ2 > λ3

Random: λ1 ≈ λ2 ≈ λ3

PGR eigenvalue analysis, following Vollmer (1990)

But how to constrain stress architecture?

Calcite piezometry, twin analysis, calcite + dolomite thermometry, microstructure, kinematics

Quartz recrystallized grain size piezometry, Ti-in-Quartz thermometry, microstructure, kinematics

But how to constrain stress architecture?

Conclusions

• Different scales of lower crustal heterogeneity interact to encourage localization and redistribution of stresses and strain-rates.

• The Seiad ultramafic complex preserves a deep-crustal detachment architecture characterized by domainal rheology at outcrop- to kilometer-scales, and will be the site for ongoing and future research into the influence of relative rheology in convergent tectonics.

• How heterogeneous is strength?• At what scale do strength contrasts have implications for plate

margin mechanics?• What is the strength of the mantle-removed?

top related