an approach to evaluation for smaller and grassroots organizations

66
AN APPROACH TO EVALUATION FOR SMALLER AND GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATIONS By Marcia Festen and Marianne Philbin With special thanks to the Pratt Richards Group for additional slides and content Level Best

Upload: niabi

Post on 23-Jan-2016

21 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Level Best. An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots Organizations. By Marcia Festen and Marianne Philbin With special thanks to the Pratt Richards Group for additional slides and content. Learning Objectives. Become more familiar with basic principles of evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

AN APPROACH TO EVALUATIONFOR SMALLER AND GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATIONS

By Marcia Festen and Marianne Philbin

With special thanks to the Pratt Richards Group for additional slides and content

Level Best

Page 2: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Learning Objectives

• Become more familiar with basic principles of evaluation

• Learn an approach that will make ongoing evaluation easier

Page 3: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Our Discussion Today

• Based on the premises, principles and steps outlined in Level Best

• 5-Step Framework

• Worksheet

Page 4: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

The Challenge

“It is easy to tell if you are succeeding in business— you make money. In philanthropy, measuring performance can be fiendishly tricky and take a lot longer.”

Warren Buffet“The New Powers In Giving”

The Economist, June 2006

Page 5: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Why Evaluate Your Program?

• To learn, plan and improve. With limited resources, you need to be as strategic as possible

• To better articulate the progress you’re making toward your goals

Page 6: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

But First…

Pick a card

Page 7: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Your Experience

• What’s been the best and worst you’ve experienced relative to undertaking evaluation?

• Your assumptions, anxieties, realities?

Page 8: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

A Few Basic Principles

Evaluation becomes less daunting when you know that…

Page 9: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

It’s Not Research

• Monitoring – measurement, on an ongoing and regular basis, of program implementation, or results of a service.

• Research – the systematic process of collecting data in a controlled environment in order to prove or disprove a hypothesis.

Page 10: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Definition of Evaluation

Evaluation is the systematic process of asking questions, and then collecting information to help answer those questions, in order to improve the work of your organization, and often to

tell the story of change.

Page 11: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Shift your thinking

…from ‘prove’ to ‘improve”

…from ‘judge’ to ‘learn’

Page 12: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

…from ‘after’ to ‘before’

• Rather than thinking of evaluation as the test that follows the work, begin to think of evaluation as the measures you put in place beforehand to help you run your programs.

• How will you evaluate the work you’re planning for this year, or next year?

Page 13: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Many methods, much jargon

Process evaluation, outcome evaluation, summative, formative, participatory, Logic Model, quasi-experimental design etc.

Page 14: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Just start by asking:

• What do we want to know?

which is generally:

ARE WE MAKING PROGRESS TOWARDS OUR GOALS?

Page 15: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Quick Exercise

• “I wish I knew whether…”

_______________________ .

Page 16: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Level Best Evaluation Steps

1. Planning…… why/what you will evaluate

2. Asking……… one-two key questions you want answered

3. Tracking…… the activities that you conduct, the signs that you’re making

progress towards your goals

4. Learning…. from what you track and what it tells you

5. Using…. the insight you gain to shape your next program

Page 17: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Limit it

• Rolling evaluation: our term for an evaluation process wherein smaller organizations choose one or two questions to ask, or areas per year to evaluate, and build evaluation learning year by year, over time.

Page 18: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

For Example

“Although we are running 3 programs as part of our Leadership Development project, this year we will focus evaluation on our Parent Training Program.

“The purpose of this particular evaluation is to help us determine whether or not to invest more in 2007 in this particular program.”

Page 19: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Step 1: Planning

• Identify a project or area you’d like to evaluate. It can be….

a priority, an idea, a particular program, a strategy within a program, an aspect of your process…

Worksheet

Page 20: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Avoid the BIGGEST Mistake

Know what you want to evaluate?

First step: be absolutely clear on its GOAL.

You cannot evaluate something for which no goal has been set !

Page 21: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

You can’t just stroll and gather…

• It is a common misperception to assume that there is something simply “there” that will become apparent if you “point the camera” and shoot, or go looking in a general way.

Page 22: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

How the Goal Shapes the Evaluation

Example:

“The Kids Will Keep Their Rooms Clean”

Page 23: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

For Every Program

* GOAL or DESIRED CHANGE:

* Rationale:

* SIGNS OF SUCCESS –

We’ll agree we’ve made progress towards this goal IF:

* STEPS to get us there:

Page 24: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Worksheet

• Fill in as we go

• Take a moment now to work together to fill in Box B, C, D

• (for now, skip A !)

Page 25: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

SO---Remind Everyone of the PROJECT’S GOAL

What is the desired overall outcome for this project?

Write down the “goal statement” in Box C

Worksheet

Page 26: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Why evaluate this now?

• Box D. Write down one purpose you could imagine having for the particular evaluation you might conduct.

Worksheet

Page 27: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Must-Have: #1

Agreement as to the CONDITION that your organization or program is addressing (is your youth theater program trying to change kids, or change local boring theater?). Clarity as to the CHANGE you hope to make.

The question you ask will change depending upon the condition you see yourself addressing.

Worksheet

Page 28: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Identifying the “condition” your program addresses

For example…

Page 29: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Must-have: #2

A clear GOAL STATEMENT for any program or area you want to evaluate; goal statement typically refers to the effect you want to have on the condition.

Page 30: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Step 2: Asking

• Once you determine the purpose of the evaluation, brainstorm with your team three or four questions you’d love to be able to answer better.

• Select one or two to explore in this evaluation. Put the others on a “calendar” for next year or the following year.

Page 31: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Types of Evaluation Questions

• In Process Evaluation the guiding questions focus on the quality of a program’s components or implementation.

• In Outcome Evaluation the guiding questions focus on the extent to which a program is achieving its desired results.

Page 32: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

You do work. When you evaluate how well you do

what you do, it’s called a PROCESS EVALUATION.

“You”

Page 33: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

“Them”

Your work has results. It influences what people do or believe.

When you evaluate what they do, it’s called an OUTCOME EVALUTION.

Page 34: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Impact

Lots of work produces multiple outcomes over time.

This equals IMPACT

Page 35: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

“Theory of Change”

The “IF” part of the statement often refers to what your organization will do (process)

the “THEN” refers to what you hope will happen as a result (outcome). In some circles, this is referred to as your “Theory of Change.”

Page 36: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

So.. are we? / did they?

• IF we offer reading tutors, THEN more people will be able to read.

• IF we educate teens effectively about sexually transmitted diseases, THEN fewer will engage in unsafe practices.

Page 37: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

THEN…

Theory of Change

IF we….

Which will lead to…

Community

or Social Change

Strategies Immediate Outcomes

Intended IMPACT

(long-term)

Intermediate Outcomes

Page 38: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

What’s Most Important

not whether you’re doing process or outcome evaluation…

simply:

What do you want to know?

Page 39: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

All flows from The Question

• You must ask a specific question: what you track, consider and learn is dependent on the question you ask.

Page 40: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

You Can Ask/Evaluate Anything

“Are teachers benefitting from the training we offer them? (How do we know?)”

“Do visitors like our exhibits? (How do we know?)”

“Are we serving girls as well as we serve boys in this program? (How do we know?)”

Page 41: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

But you must ask something!

• Evaluation is NOT about collecting massive amounts of information, and then attempting to sort through it later to see “what it says”

Page 42: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Step 3: Tracking

• List two or three things that if they occurred, would be signs of progress, examples that might show you’re

* making progress towards the desired outcome for the project

or

* that provide information that would help you answer the question you’ve posed.

Page 43: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Indicators

What information would tell you if you’re making progress toward your desired outcome?

What would you track to help you answer the evaluation question you posed? That’s an “indicator”

Page 44: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Program Example

• Desired Outcome: Our theater’s main stage audience engagement increases

• How We’ll Know We’re Making Progress/ #1: Mainstage attendance as a percent of total seat capacity will increase to 65% for the 2010-11 season.

• How We’ll Know We’re Making Progress/ #2: 90% of mainstage audience members completing the end of season survey will be “very” or “somewhat satisfied” with the season.

Page 45: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Organizational Example

• Desired Outcome: Board engagement improves

• How we'll know we're making progress / #1: 80% of Board members will contribute $500 or more in FY2011.

• How we'll know we're making progress / #2: Each quarterly Board meeting will have 75% attendance or better in FY2011.

Page 46: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Golden Rule

In evaluation we want to measure

what we can control.

So…

Page 47: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Measure What Is in YOUR Control…

Not everything that you want to achieve

in your program will be measurable.

Page 48: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Track What’s Closest to What YOU do

The goal of our tutoring program is to help students…

--someday get jobs --graduate from high school

-- better homework completion rate -- attend homework helper program

-- be referred to this program by teacher

Keep drilling down, ask “what needs to happen before that can happen?” You can’t track it all.

Page 49: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

S.M.A.R.T. Indicators

• Specific• Measurable• Attainable• Relevant

• Time bound

Page 50: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Which Indicators to Track

• Refer back to the CONDITION you’re hoping to change or address in the first place

Page 51: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Use What You Have

• Think creatively – how might you be able to tell that you are achieving your desired results?

• Chances are, you’re already “evaluating” on some level. What kinds of information are you already routinely gathering?

There are no laws; there is no one right way. There is no evaluation police

Page 52: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Peer Feedback

• Volunteers: Share your question

• Colleagues: What might your colleague track in order to answer that question?

Page 53: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Don’t overdo it

“Most of the time, what funders and nonprofits really want to know is if an intervention can have positive outcomes given the right conditions, and if the results are worth the investment-- and they only need to know these answers ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’…. Usually, this doesn’t require a great deal of time or money. It does, however, require being very clear about what you want to know, and why you want to know it.”

---Report from Gill Foundation

Page 54: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Sources of Information

• Agency Records

• Questionnaires/Surveys

• Interviews

• Focus Groups

• Direct Observation

Page 55: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Who Does It?

Another good reason to have an Evaluation Working Group is to help think through the evaluation implementation.

Who is going to:• Collect data

• Enter it • Compile it for review?

Page 56: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Step 4: Learning

Instead of thinking in terms of data analysis, helpful to think about data interpretation.

You are looking for patterns and trends;

You are attempting to find correlation and not causation.

Page 57: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

What did you learn?

Do your findings speak

for themselves?

Page 58: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

What does our data tell us?

1. How successful were we in reaching our desired outcomes/goals?

2. What might we do next year to improve our programs/services?

3. How might these improvements lead to greater impact in the future?

Page 59: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Challenges

And if you don’t like the results?

Page 60: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Step 5: Using

Plug your new knowledge back into the cycle!

Page 61: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

The Evaluation Cycle

Program Evaluation

Program Planning

Program Implementation

Page 62: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Use Evaluation Results to:

• Make Your Case

• Plan Your Next Move

• Gain Perspective

• Identify Resources Needed:

Page 63: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Do NOT Use Results to:

• Punish staff (though evaluation can identify staff/management issues that need to be addressed)

• Distract from other issues or cover up a problem

• Spend over budget

• Overconfidently dismiss alternate views or approaches.

• Prove to the world how good you are (While it’s good to toot your horn and show your results, don’t do it at the expense of learning how to be even better.)

Page 64: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Where to Use Evaluation Findings

Decision-Making Moments

• Staff meetings• Board meetings• Annual planning• Strategic planning• Budget planning

Show and Tell Moments

• Proposals/Report to funders

• Annual report• Board meetings

Page 65: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Rolling Evaluation

Don’t forget! The purpose of rolling evaluation is to isolate one or two key questions to ask PER year. So when you have successfully completed one cycle, begin again by revisiting some of the questions you “shelved” last year.

Page 66: An Approach to Evaluation for Smaller and Grassroots  Organizations

Level Best Evaluation Steps1. Planning…… identifying your evaluation goals

2. Asking……… one-two key questions you want answered

3. Tracking…… the activities that you conduct, the signs that you’re making

progress towards your goals

4. Learning…. from what you track and what it tells you

5. Using…. the insight you gain to shape your next program