an assessment of services trade policy reform: some evidence aaditya mattoo
TRANSCRIPT
An Assessment of Services
Trade Policy Reform:
Some Evidence
Aaditya Mattoo
Three questions:
• How large are the gains from services liberalization?
• What are the elements of successful reform?
• What role can the GATS and international support play?
1. How big are the gains from liberalization?
•Strong intuition but weak evidence
Three examples:
a. Dynamic benefitsb. The link with trade in goodsc. Temporary movement of
individuals
1a. Successful services reform is associated with more rapid growth
Linear prediction
1 8.5
-.024
.059
ITA NZL
SLV
PAN
PRT
FIN
ISL
ARG
CHE
ESP
BEL NLD
NOR USA CAN SGP
EGY
FRA
SWE
GRC
GUY
AUS
GBR
AUT
CYP JAM
BOL
DNK
MLT
MWI
CRI
ZAF TUR
MOZ
KEN
IND
MAR
VEN
MEX PHL
NIC CHL
URY KOR PER
MYS
ECU
AGO
THA
HND
COL
TUN LKA
BRA
IDN
DOM
Composite services liberalization index
Growth rate (adjusted for other factors)
Source: Mattoo, Rathindran and Subramanian (2001)
High Cost of Telecommunications Penalizes Trade, Especially in
Differentiated Goods
0.640.78
1.80
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
homogeneous reference differentiated
Note: The chart is based on 1999 data and uses the Rauch classification of goods.
1b. Services trade policy affects the size and pattern of trade in goods
Some Cross Country Comparisons of Softw are Services
$5.00
$10.00 $10.00
$18.00
$22.00
$0.30 $0.60 $0.60 $1.10 $1.30
$0.00
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
India Italy Ireland United States Germany
Cos
t per
line
of c
ode
(US
$)
Development
Support
1c. Gains from liberalizing mode 4
1c. Mode 4: Some preliminary estimates
Increase in developed countries’ quotas on skilled and unskilled temporary labour movement equivalent to 3% of their labour force could lead to an estimated $156 billion increase in world welfare
(which is greater than the estimated gains from complete liberalization of goods trade).
2. The elements of successful reform
a. Emphasis on competition
b. Effective domestic regulation
c. Appropriate sequencing
2a. The pattern of reform in basic telecommunications
P r o p o r t i o n o f c o u n t r i e s w i t h p r i v a t i z e d i n c u m b e n t p h o n e o p e r a t o r s ( b y r e g i o n )
0 . 0 0
0 . 2 0
0 . 4 0
0 . 6 0
0 . 8 0
1 . 0 0
1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 9
A s i a
A f r i c a
L a t i n A m e r i c a
P r o p o r t i o n o f c o u n t r i e s w i t h c o m p e t i t i o n i n l o c a l s e r v i c e s ( b y r e g i o n )
0 . 0 0
0 . 2 0
0 . 4 0
0 . 6 0
0 . 8 0
1 . 0 0
1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 9
A s i a
A f r i c a
L a t i n A m e r i c a
P r o p o r t i o n o f c o u n t r i e s w i t h a n i n d e p e n d e n t r e g u l a t o r ( b y r e g i o n )
0 . 0 00 . 1 00 . 2 00 . 3 00 . 4 00 . 5 00 . 6 00 . 7 00 . 8 00 . 9 01 . 0 0
1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 9
A s i a
A f r i c a
L a t i n A m e r i c a
S o u r c e : W o r l d B a n k / I . T . U . T e l e c o m P o l i c y D a t a b a s e , a n d F i n k , M a t t o o , R a t h i n d r a n ( 2 0 0 1 ) , f o r t h c o m i n g .
2a. The power of competition
1.a. Mainlines
7.30%
13.80%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
privatized privatized+competition
1.b. Productivity
13.80%
31%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
privatized privatized+competition
2a. Questions that remain
• Are there good reasons to limit entry/ownership?
•Why is entry/ownership restricted?
How much is to be gained from eliminating all barriers to entry/ownership when some is already permitted?
2b. Effective regulation
(i) To remedy informational problems (e.g. in financial and professional services)
(ii) To remedy market power (e.g. in transport and energy services)
(iii) To achieve social objectives (e.g. universal access in transport, telecom, financial and health services; and alleviation of adjustment costs).
2b(i) Regulation to remedy informational problems
(e.g. in financial and professional services):
– As a precondition for successful liberalization
– As an impediment to trade
2b(i) Regulation as a precondition: anexample
Several African countries have alreadyundertaken significant liberalizationof financial services…
Market access commitments on commercialpresence under the GATS on banking
Limitations onFull or ltnsonly on thelegal form
Only no.ofsuppliers
Onlyforeignequity
Both no.of ssrs.Andforeignequity
Egypt, Ghana,Kenya,Lesotho,Mozambique,Sierra Leone,Malawi,Nigeria,Senegal,South Africa
Angola,Benin,Gabon,Morocco,Mauritius,Tunisia
Zimba-bwe
Gambia,Morocco
…But Interest Rate Spreads Have Widened Significantly in Some African
Countries with Liberalized Markets, 1980-97 (percent)
4.83.2
5.1 5.5
13.5 13.1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Kenya Nigeria
1980 1990 1997
2b(i) Regulation as a precondition: an example
2b(i) Regulation as an impediment?
Three examples:
•Qualification requirements•Offshore financial services•Privacy
2b(ii) Regulation to remedy market power (e.g. in transport and
energy services)
• As a precondition for market access
• As a guarantor of consumer interests
Port liberalization and Breakup of Private Carrier Agreements:
Estimated Reductions in Liner Transport Prices
8.27
20.05
0
5
10
15
20
25
Liberalization of port services Breakup of private carrieragreements
equivalent to savings of $850 million
equivalent to savings of $2,063 million
2b(ii) Regulation to protect consumer interests
2b(iii) Regulation to achieve social objectives
• Universal service
• Adjustment costs
2c. The sequence of telecom reform inselected countries
Country 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
MalaysiaPrivatization Competition Regulation
IndiaPrivatizationCompetition Regulation
ArgentinaPrivatization CompetitionRegulation
BrazilPrivatization Competition Regulation
El SalvadorPrivatization Competition Regulation
NigeriaPrivatizationCompetition Regulation
South AfricaPrivatization CompetitionRegulation
UgandaPrivatization Competition Regulation
Source: World Bank/ITU Telecommunications Policy Database & Fink, Mattoo, Rathindran (2001),forthcoming.Note: Competition refers to the fixed-line local services segment.
2c. Sequences matter
Source: World Bank/ITU Telecommunications Policy Database & Fink, Mattoo, Rathindran (2001), forthcoming.
1.c. Effects of sequencingon mainlines
12.40%
25.50%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Privatization beforecompetition
Competition before privatization
3. International engagement: trade
negotiations
Three benefits:
•Deeper liberalization through reciprocal exchange of concessions•Credibility through binding commitments•Regulatory cooperation
3. Complementary global efforts
• Devising sound policy
• Strengthening the regulatory environment
• Enhancing developing country participation in international standard setting
• Ensuring access to essential services in the poorest areas