analogue hawking radiation in a flow of light
TRANSCRIPT
S. Bar-Ad,
O. Farberovich,
I. Fouxon
M. Elazar
Y. Vinish
Tel Aviv University
R. Schilling, Mainz U.
EPL, 92, 14002 (2010) Phys.Rev.A, 86, 063821 (2012) Phys.Rev. A 85, 045602 (2012) Phys.Rev. A 60, 013802 (2013) Chapter in: Analogue Gravity Phenomenology, Series: Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 870, Springer Int.J.Mod.Phys.B 30, 1650 (2016)
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Analogue Hawking radiation in a "flow of light"
Analogue gravity by an optical vortex. Resonance enhancement
of Hawking radiation Marco Ornigotti Shimshon Bar-Ad Alexander Szameit Victor Fleurov
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
arXiv:1704.07609 PRA - submitted
• Black hole • Analogue gravity-Transonic flow. • Maxwell equations and hydrodynamics. • Mimicking horizon and curved space, Hawking
radiation • Fluctuations in transonic regime – linear geometry • Vortex as a background • Superradiance and resonant enhancement
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Black hole – naïve approach
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
22 mcmvR
MmG <= Escape velocity cannot exceed speed of light
2cMGRR s => Radius of event horizon
24 MS π=
Temperature M
MS
ES
Tπ81
=∂∂
=∂∂
=
Entropy = surface area
Black hole Hawking radiation
KM
M
KM
kgGMk
cT
s
BH
8
232
106
10227.18
−⋅=
⋅==
π
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Black hole radiates according to the Planck law for black body radiation
Modeling black hole in a flow – Unruh, 1981
Pt
t
∇−=∇⋅+∂∂
=⋅∇+∂∂
ρ
ρρ
1)(
0)(
vvv
v
ϕϕϕψψψ
+→+→
00
00
Continuity equation
Euler equation
Laminar solution for a transonic flow
plus fluctuations near this solution
00
00
ϕρρ ψ
∇==
ve
W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1351 (1981)
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Equation for fluctuations
( ) ( ) 00000 =⋅∇+∇⋅∇+∂∂ ψρϕρψρ v
t
020 =+∇⋅+
∂∂ ψϕϕ s
tv
( ) ( )[ ] [ ] 0ttt
200002
2
=∇⋅∇−∇⋅⋅∇+
∂∂
⋅∇+∇⋅∂∂
+∂∂ ϕϕϕϕϕ svvvv
Excluding ψ
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
01=
∂∂
−∂∂
−ϕj
iji x
ggxg
−−
−=
2200000
0022
000
000022
0
0001
1
svvvvvvvvsvvvvvvvvsvv
vvv
sg
oxzyzxx
zyoxyxy
zxyxoxx
zyx
ij
( ) 2det/1 −−== sgg ij
)ln(21)(
20
20
ss
rra
tvsdrrvt −+≈
−+= ∫ ⊥
⊥
τ
[ ]( )rrrvvv ddddtdtss
dxdxgd jiij ⋅−⋅+⋅−== 0
200
22 21σ
Contravariant metric in a “curvilinear space”
ji
ljil gg δ=
Connection between contravariant and covariant metrics
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
1 + 1 Klein-Gordon equation
01=
∂∂
−∂∂
−ψ
xgg
xg jij
i
−
−=
22
22
1 0
0 1
sv
sv
sg
x
x
ij
−
= 22
11svv
vs
gxx
xij
( )22222 2)(1 dxdtdxvdtvss
d xx ++−−=σ
222
222
2 dxvs
sds
vsdx
x
−+
−−= τσ
dxsv
vddtx
x22 −
−= τ
xavs sx =− 22Schwarzschild metric
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Hawking radiation
[ ]
⋅−
−⋅−==00
2
22
0022 1
vvvv
ssdrds
sdxdxgd ji
ij τσ
The corresponding equation for fluctuation is equivalent to that considered by Hawking.
Hawking radiation in a laboratory
“Schwarzschild metric”
ra
tvsdrrvt
s
ln21)(
20
20 +≈−
+= ∫ ⊥
⊥
τ
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
s > v, subsonic
s < v, supersonic
“Mach horizon”
sonar
Submarine can be located by the sonar
Submarine can still be located by the sonar but with a very long waiting time. Time slowing.
Submarine cannot be located by the sonar
axsxvxx
aaxsaxs
a
axdx
axsdx
xvsdx
xvsdxt
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
+=+++
≈−
++
≈−
++
= ∫∫∫∫
)( ;ln122ln1
2)()(
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0xx=0 x
1x
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Madelung transformation:
Gross-Pitaevskii Eq.:
=>
Bose-Einstein Condensate
E. Madelung, Quantum theory in hydrodynamic form, Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1927).
Euler flow equations for light
- ψψψψ 22 ||
21 gm
i xt +∂−=∂
)exp( ϕρψ i−=
+
∇−∇−=∇+∂
=∇+∂
ρρρ
ρρ
gmm
vv
v
t
t
22
211
21
0)(
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
QFC2017 - Pisa
Nonlinear Schrödinger equation. I
0. B ,BE
0, D ,DH
=•∇∂∂
−=×∇
=•∇∂∂
=×∇
t
t
HB
dtrEtrEtrD
µ
τττεε
=
−== ∫∞
,),()(),(ˆ),(0
0)ˆ(),( 2
22 =
∂∂
+∇− Et
trE εµ
Maxwell equations
Helmholtz equation
11/6/2017
Non-Linear Schrödinger (NLS) equation
)exp(),,,(2
);,,( 0 tizizyxAdtzyxE ωβωπω
−= ∫
0ω
0ˆ 2
22
2
2
2
2
2
2
=∂∂
−+∂∂
+∂∂
+∂∂
tEEE
yE
xE
zE εα
Helmholtz equation deduced from the Maxwell equations
paraxial approximation
Wave packet around the frequency and wave vector 0β
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa I.Carusotto, C. Ciuti RMP, 2013
Non-Linear Schrödinger (NLS) equation
Refraction coefficient plays the role of potential
Spatial coordinate ‘z’ is now “time”
Time ‘t’ is now a “spatial coordinate”
2
2
02
2
2
2
~2t
Dyx ∂
∂+
∂∂
+∂∂
=∆ πβ
AAgAyxnAAz
i 2220
0
)],([2
1+−+∆−=
∂∂ β
β
Kerr nonlinearity
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
z
x
Hydrodynamic representation
zAiAAgAUext ∂∂
=+
+∇− 22
021β
ϕifeA −=
2
2
0
2
0
2
21
21
0)(
sg
gUz
z
ext
=
++
∇−∇−=∇+
∂∂
=∇+∂∂
ρ
ρρρ
ββ
ρρ
vv
v
The density field
The velocity field
Continuity equation
Euler equation
Quantum potential
Substituted into
ϕβ
ρ
−∇=
==
vfA
0
22
sound velocity
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Behavior of fluctuation modes near the “horizon”. QP neglected
)ln(32
1
xs
ii ee−
= αν
ντξ
νανα
ννξ ξνντ
231
1
2)( ;)(
2
i
i
ske iki
−
−== −
HTs eeν
απν
⇒32
The first mode oscillates like crazy near the horizon (x=0) and acquires the factor when crossing it. This factor defines the “Hawking temperature”.
πα2
3 sTH =
“Left” mover Right mover
se απν
32
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
QFC2017 - Pisa
Straddled fluctuations
∫ −= )()();( xegdzxf ziω
ω ξωω
( )2
2
2
21)( Γ
−−
Γ=
g
egωω
πω
Zero at the horizon
11/6/2017
Derivation of Hawking temperature s
rl e απν
ϕϕ 32
+
134
32
−=−=+ ls
rs
rl ee ϕϕϕϕ απν
απν
1
1
34
−se απν
The fluctuation is cut in two parts
KG normalization requires that
The relative weight of the left part is
It is identified as Planck distribution απλ
πα
ν ssT
eH
TH38 ;
43 ;
1
1 2
H ==
−
Assuming a symmetry lr ϕϕ =
Hawking “temperature” corresponds to the wave length
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
QFC2017 - Pisa
Close to the horizon. Role of QP ( )
( ) 0)]()([)1(41
0)(
22
2
=∂−+−+∂−−+−
=++∂∂−+−
kkkkkk
kkkkkk
ksksiisikki
kkiksksii
ξαξνχαβχαβ
ξβ
ξβ
αχαχν
222223
2
||21
21 ;...
18),(
Agslkilk n
n
ββαν ==
+−=Λ
),(exp)33
2(),( 21 ikxkikkdkezxC
zi +Λ−−= ∫− νανχ γγν
322221 81
48114
641 ;
241 ν
αν
ναν
γαν
γ nn lilii−+−−=−=
11/6/2017
QFC2017 - Pisa
Close to the horizon 3
23
2
22
211
814
272
32 ,
sli
sl
six nn
s ανν
αν
γγγχ γ +−=−−=≈ −
( ) 3/11,min
ααν n
nr l
llxs=>>
This solution holds in the window
For smaller x fluctuations are regular and do not zero on the horizon
3
22
1
818
34
)(1
;1)(
sl
sT
eN
n
H
TH
ανπ
απ
ν
ων
+=
−=
−
Frequency distribution of the HR deviates from the Planck function at high frequencies.
Corrections
due to QP
Parentani etal, 2009,2011 (numerically)
11/6/2017
VF, R. Schilling, 2012 (analytically)
QFC2017 - Pisa
J.Macher, R.Parentani PRD79,124008(2009), PRA80, 043601(2009)
222242
2 )]([)(2
),( ln xkvxsksklxkix nkk −=+=Ω⇒−=∂ νχ
Saddle point equation
subsonic supersonic
11/6/2017
Quantization of fluctuations
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
ϑϑβ
ϑσϑ
ϑσϑϑσϑ
∇∇−+−
−=
++
++
)(4
1)1(21
])()([4
20
0
40
20
fgf
DDfiL
z
yy
ξ20)( fzpx −= Canonical momentum
),( zxχ Canonical coordinate
)'()],(),,'([20 xxiNzxzxf −= δχξ
=
ξ
χϑ
22
1
Y.Vinish, VF, IJMP, 2016 P. E. Larre and I. Carusotto, PRA 2015
Experimental realizations in progress
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
1. U. Leonhardt etal – light reflected by a soliton in a waveguide
2. D. Fazzio etal – light reflected by a soliton in a waveguide
3. J. Steinhauer etal – BEC observation of a horizon and radiation
4. S. Bar-Ad etal – “luminous fluid” in a nonlinear medium
5. S. Weinfurthner – “bathtub” experiments
Optical vortex – Laguerre-Gauss beam
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
φβ
ϕβ
πφ
ˆˆ),,(1)(
2)(|!|
2),( )(/2)(||
2
2
2
22
2
rnr
frfzr
eeezw
rzwn
zrP inzwrzRri
n
−=∇−=
=
⊥
−−
v
φβ
inzRri
ee )(
2−
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Optical vortex – Laguerre-Gauss beam
“Kerr” metric
−−
−−
=
=∂−∂−
1000000010
0))det(()det(
1
2
20
2
rrvv
rvvvs
g
ggg
r
r
φ
φ
µν
νµνµν
µµν
ξ
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
( )
+−
−−−= φφ φdzdrvdrdr
vssdzvs
sdl
r
21 22222
222
022
0 ,0 2220
2 =−=− rvsvs
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Position of event horizon
2
2
0
)(frrPgI
=β
II– subsonic I, III - supersonic
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Ergoregion
rn
frrPgI
20
2
2
2
0
)(ββ
+=
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Geometry of the flow
F. Marino PPA2008.2009
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Superradiance
−−
−
=
+=
2
nrmni
riri
Te
eRe
βν
νν
ψ
ψScattering of a cylindrical wave
−=− 2
22 ||||
1||1hr
mnTRβ
νν
1|| ,0||1 22
2 ><
− R
rmnT
hβν
ν
The scattered wave is stronger than the incident
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Hawking radiation-resonance
−
−=
−
22
1
3s2
||11e)(hr
mnTNβ
νν
νν
απ
2hr
nmβ
νν −=
φφν
φν
πτνπλ
τλβ
ν
vr
mr
nm
h
h
/2 ,/2
02
==
=⇒=−
2||||
12
3)( TsNνπ
αν =
Spectrum of Hawking radiation
Resonance condition: An integer number of wavelengths coincide with the time (propagation distance ) necessary for one full rotation of the vortex
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Does white horizon play a role?
horizonblack -~2
−=
+
+h
h rmnβ
νν
horizon white-~2
−=
−
−h
h rmnβ
νν
+−< hh rr
+−>
hh rr νν
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
2
222
222 1
srvs
rmn
sr−
−
−=∂β
νψ
−<
hrνν
−+<<
hh rr ννν
νν <−hr
regular regime
There is a barrier between the horizons reflecting the radiation. Can it be a BH bomb? Press, Teukolsky, Nature, 1972
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa
Concluding remarks • Hawking radiation can be studied in laboratory. • A possible way is to create an optical transonic flow.
Currently in progress.
• Studying classical fluctuations may be feasible and presents a special interest, especially superradiance.
• Resonance with a vortex can make observation of Hawking radiation by the vortex feasible.
11/6/2017 QFC2017 - Pisa