analyses of oxygen-induced radicals in uhmwpe€¦ · 3 background 1: free radical decay in open...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Analyses of Oxygen-Induced Radicals in UHMWPE
M. Shah Jahan, Muhammad Fuzail, Marlon D. Ridley, Benjamin M. Walters Biomaterials Research Laboratory
Department of Physics, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA
In this report we conducted free radical measurements on UHMWPE following
sterilization with gamma rays (Co-60) at room temperature in open air, vacuum, nitrogen, or argon and subsequently aged at room temperature, 37˚C or 75˚C for approximately 10 years. Measurements made on vitamin E-mixed UHMWPE powder as well as compression-molded bulk materials are also presented. Additionally, this report includes data obtained from measurements on retrieved acetabular cups and tibial inserts. All free radical measurements were conducted using X-band (~9 GHz) electron spin resonance (ESR) technique.
When annealing is performed at 75˚C in inert environments, PE free radical number is reduced significantly (~98%). However, the residual radicals (remaining 2%, approximately) produce oxygen-induced radical (OIR) upon subsequent exposure to oxygen (open air). OIRs are also detected in acetabular cups and knee-joint plateaus retrieved 6-8 years following implantation.
Two groups of vitamin-E samples were investigated. In one group, samples were
prepared from blends of α-T and UHMWPE powder (α-T-P), and in the second group, from
compression molded blocks (α-T-B). In each group, samples were gamma-irradiated in sealed packages filled with N2, or in open air, and free radicals were measured in open air
environment as a function of time. PE radicals were found to be quenched by α-T in presence of oxygen (open air) but not in packages containing N2. Furthermore, like in control, OIR
were formed in N2-packaged α-T-P as well as in α-T-B. Acknowledgements: Work was supported in part by funds from the NSF Industry/University Center for Biosurfaces and the University of Memphis.
2
Structure and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of PE free radicals at X-band microwave frequency 9.5-9.8 GHz and amplitude 2.0 mW, 100 kHz magnetic field modulation and signal detection frequency, and 5.0 G modulation amplitude. An alkyl radical produces six lines with separation between the lines 23-28 G and allyl produces seven or five lines with separation 13-15 G. The single line produced by the residual oxygen-induced radical (OIR) has been attributed by many to peroxy (PO2.), alkoxy (PO.) or polyenyl (P.).
ES
R
Inte
nsity
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
3250 3300 3350 3400 3450 3500 3550
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
Comparison of Gamma Sterilized
And X Irradiated UHMWPE
Gamma-irradiated
Allyl radical
X-irradiated
Alkyl radical
23-28 G
13-15 G
−−−−CH2 −−−− CH •••• −−−−CH2 −−−−
−CH2−CH = CH − •CH −CH2 −
PO2., PO., P. ??
ESR Spectrum of oxygen-induced Radical
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
3380 3430 3480 3530 3579
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
Sig
nal In
ten
sit
y (
Arb
itra
ry u
nit
s)
---- C ---- C ---- C ----
H H
H H H
Alkyl Radical
---- C ---- C ---- C ----
H H
H H H
Peroxy Radical
OO---- C ---- C = C ---- C ---- C ---- C
H H H H H H
H H H H
End-Chain Allyl
Radical
Polyethylene Free Radicals
?
ESR Spectrum of oxygen-induced Radical
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
3380 3430 3480 3530 3579
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
Sig
na
l In
ten
sit
y (
Arb
itra
ry u
nit
s)
Introduction (contd): Polyethylene Free Radicals
293 K
118 K
g= 2.032
g= 2.003
Characteristicof peroxy
PO2.
PO., P.
ESR spectrum due to peroxy radicals exhibits a single line at room temperature (293 K) whose asymmetric feature with characteristic g-values, g⊥=2.003 and g║= 2.032, is resolved at low temperature (118 K) [J. Durant, M.S. Jahan, NIMB, 236 (2005) 160].
The single-line spectrum produced by the residual OIR in UHMWPE does not exhibit characteristic feature of a peroxy radical at room or low temperature.
The objective of this report is to determine the type/structure of the OIR by analyzing its ESR spectrum.
3
Background 1: free radical decay in open air as a function of time following gamma sterilization (3 MRad) in air.
UHMWPE Resins: GUR 412, GUR 415, Himont 1900Storage/annealing temp.: room temperature (RT), 37˚C, 75˚C
Storage/annealing time.: 750 daysResult: Production of oxygen-induced radical (OIR)
ANNEALING TIME (Days)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
FR
EE
RA
DIC
AL
CO
NC
EN
TR
AT
ION
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 412 37C 415 37C
1900 37C 412 75C 415 75
1900 75C 412 RT 415 RT
1900 RT
23oC
37oC
75oC
Initial ESRprimary radical
Intermediate ESRsecondary radical
Terminal ESROIR radical
Background 2: free radical decay in sealed ESR tubes (argon, nitrogen or vacuum)as a function of time following gamma sterilization (3 MRad) in the same tube.
UHMWPE Resins: GUR 412, GUR 415, Himont 1900Storage/annealing temp.: room temperature (RT), 37˚C, 75˚C
Storage/annealing time.: 750 daysResult: primary radical concentration decreases but no OIR is produced
ANNEALING TIME (Days)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
FR
EE
RA
DIC
AL
CO
NC
EN
TR
AT
ION
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 412
415
1900
412
415
1900
412
4151900
23oC
37oC
75oC
Initial ESRPrimary radical
Terminal ESRPrimary radical
4
K. Nakamura, S. Ogata, Y. Ikada, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 2341-2346;
L. Costa, M. P. Luda, L. Trossarelli, E. M. Brach del Prever, M. Crova, P. Gallinaro, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 659-668;
P. O’Neill, C. Birkinshaw, J. J. Leahy, R. Barklie, Polym. Degr. Stabil. 63 (1999) 31-39].
8 years in N2Initial (1998)
(A) (B)22 G
2006 3 MRad Gamma in N2
145 G145 G
Background 3: In 8 years in nitrogen ESR intensity is reduced (A-B),but OIR is not formed.
(C): OIR forms in air (oxygen) within 64 days (see references)
(C)
OIR
secondary
ESR
Consistent with SEM results, results of this study show
two distinct surfaces, low-radical region (A-G) in the
figure correlates with the high wear or superior half
separated by a high-radical region (H-P) which correlates
with the low wear or inferior half.
Radical concentration at retrieval (8 years after implantation) and 13 years later
14.0
14.5
15.0
15.5
Lo
g (
Rad
icals
/gm
)
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
Sample Position Within Cup
At Retrieval 13 Years Later
Radical conc. @ sample position
Background 4: OIR in retrieved acetabular cup
Acetabular cup
A
E D C B
ESR sample
PH
NLow wear
High wear
5
ESR spectrum of residual free radicals (OIR)
Retrieval (GCR5#a)
Inte
nsity 86 months in shelf
& 07 months in-vivo
Retrieval (GCR5#b)
Inte
nsity P 86 months in shelf
& 07 months in-vivo
Retrieval (GCR5#c)
Magnetic Field in Gauss3300 3350 3400 3450
Inte
nsity
86 months in shelf& 07 months in-vivo
Amplified 10
times primary
Background 5: Examples of OIR in a gamma-sterilized and
clinically retrieved TPI (86 months in shelf and 7 months in vivo).
Presence of trace amount of primary radicals is also evident.
ESR samples from
different positions on a
given TPI
Background 6: Examples of OIR in clinically retrieved TPI retrieved 6.5 years after implantation
Unlike acetabular cup, tibial plateaus show low radical
concentration in the central part of the joint, which is typically
the high wear region .
ESR data recorded at retrieval and 13 years later
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
15.5
16.0
16.5
1 2 3 4 5 6
Sample Posit ion
Data Set B At RetrievalData Set B 13 Years Later
TPI
ESR sample
A
B
C
1 2 3 4 5 6
C6
Radical concentration @ sample position
13 years after retrieval, samples
of all sections A, B and CAt and 13 years after retrieval,
samples of section B only
13.7
13.8
13.9
14.0
14.1
14.2
14.3
14.4
14.5
14.6
14.7
1 2 3 4 5 6
TPI Sample Position
Lo
g (
rad
ica
ls/g
)
A
B
C
6
Background 7:
Example of OIR in Vitamin E-dopedUHMWPE
ESR spectrum of OIR in e-PE recorded two years after gamma irradiationin nitrogen or air (OA).
Vitamin E concentration used were 10% and 20%
UHMWPE GUR 1020With vitamin E
Analysis of ESR spectrum of OIRSpectrum recorded as a function microwave power and temperature
R1
R2
R2
1.0 mW (23 oC)
0.01 mW (23 oC)
160 mW (23 oC)
10 mW (-133 oC)
(a)
(c)
(b)
(d)
(∆∆∆∆H = 5.5 G)
R1R2
R2
-g1 = 2.0044
30 G
30 G
100 MRad Gamma in air (1988) 18 years in air, ESR 2006
g2 = 2.0056
UHMWPE GUR 4150 R2
Result: the standard single-line spectrum (b) is reduced to a symmetric single line (a) due to radical R1 at 0.01 mW microwave power, and a spectrum with six weak hyperfine lines at 10.0 mW and -133˚C due to radical R2 (d).
7
R2
R2
R1
R1
UHMWPE GUR 1020With vitamin E
R1
R2
R2
1.0 mW (23 oC)0.01 mW (23 oC)
160 mW (23 oC)10 mW (-133 oC)
(a)
(c)
(b)
(d)
( ∆∆∆∆H = 5.5 G)
R1R2
R2
-g1 = 2.0044
30 G
30 G
g2 = 2.0056
R2
Conventional UHMWPE GUR 4150Without vitamin E
Identical OIR, R1 and R2, are alsoformed in e-PE
SQRT (Power) / mW1/2
2 4 6 8 10 12 140.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
I R2 / I R1
Fig 2: Peak intensity as a function of microwave power a) Intensity as a function of sqrt µµµµ-wave powerb) Relative Intensity
b) Relative Power Saturation
Peak In
ten
sit
y /a
SQRT (Power) / mW1/20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
a) Power saturation
Radical 1
Radical 2
IR2
IR1
Radical 10.01 mW
Radical 2160 mW
Analysis Test: Radical R1 and R2 have different microwavepower saturation behavior
8
R a d ic a l-1
S w e e p w id th (g a u s s )
3 4 8 0 3 4 9 0 3 5 0 0 3 5 1 0 3 5 2 0 3 5 3 0 3 5 4 0
Sig
nal In
ten
sit
y
-2 0 0
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
8 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
(R o o m T e m p .)
(5 m in a t 1 3 0 C )
(1 5 m in a t 1 3 0 C )
(3 0 m in a t 1 3 0 C )
(6 0 m in a t 1 3 0 C )
(9 0 m in a t 1 3 0 C )
R a d ic a l-2
S w e e p w id th (g a u s s )
3 4 8 0 3 4 9 0 3 5 0 0 3 5 1 0 3 5 2 0 3 5 3 0 3 5 4 0
Sig
nal In
ten
sit
y
-1 5 0 0
-1 0 0 0
-5 0 0
0
5 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 5 0 0
(R o o m T e m p .)
(5 m in )
(1 5 m in )
(3 0 m in )
(6 0 m in )
(9 0 m in )
F ig 3 : A n n e a lin g o f R 1 a n d R 2 a t 1 3 0 oC a s a fu n c tio n o f t im e . a ) S p e c tra
s h o w in g d e c a y o f s in g le lin e (R 1 ) b ) S p e c tra s h o w in g d e c a y o f R 2
a ) R 1 d ec a y a t 1 3 0 oC
b ) R 2 d e c ay a t 1 3 0 oC
Analysis Test 2:Thermal stability
At 130˚C, ESRspectrum of R1 reduces slower
than that due R2
0 200 400 600 800 100012001400
ESR Intensity (%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time (Hrs.)
0 20 40 60 80 1001201401601800
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time (Hrs.)
a) Annealing Ttemperature 75 oC
b) Annealing Temperature 100 oC
Fig 4(I): ESR intensity (%) due to radicals R1 and R2
Radical 1
Radical 2
Radical 2
Radical 1
Fig 4(II): ESR intensity (%) due to radicals R1and R2
a)
b)
Time (Minutes)
0 20 40 60 80 100
ESR Intensity (%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time (Minutes)
0 5 10 15 20 250
20
40
60
80
100
120
a) Annealing Temperature 130oC
b) AnnealingTemperature 140 oC
Radical 2
Radical 1
Radical 2
Radical 1
Analysis Test 2 (contd):Thermal stabilityDecay of Radicals R1 and R2 as a function of time at and temp.
9
summaryReported for the First time�So called single-line ESR spectrum of the Long-lived oxygen-induced radicals resolved into two resonance signals, produced by
two different radicals:
o radical R1: polyenyl radical (-C*H-[CH=CH-]m-), a radical having a large number (m) of conjugated double bonds
� radical R2: oxygen-centred di- or tri-enyl (-CHO*-[CH=CH-]n-),
o Radical 1 resides in crystalline region of the polymer matrix
� Radical 2 resides in near-crystalline region or voids inside crystal, and may have dangling bond for oxygen attachment
� Structural stability (high conjugation) may also contribute to the longevity of Radical 2
o Radical 1 and Radical 2 both can be annealed at 140˚C
� Radical 2 can be annealed at 130˚C, below crystal melting temperature
Thank YouThank YouThank YouThank You