analysis 1 (autosaved)
TRANSCRIPT
INTERNSHIP PROJECT – Kalpathi
Investments (AGS Cinemas Pvt. Ltd.)
SUBMITTED BY SASHANK KINI
SY BBA, MS UNIVERSITY
Acknowledgements
My sincere and hearty acknowledgement extends first and foremost to Mr. Parimal Vyas, Head
of Commerce and Business Management Department, for introducing a summer internship
opportunity as a pre-requisite for undergraduate students at Maharaja Sayajirao University’s
Business Administration programme. I am grateful to Mr. Shyamal Pradhan, Programme
Director at Business Administration programme, for continuing with this tradition through the
years, giving young minds a glorious chance to practically understand and explore their
education in the real world.
I am extremely touched by the continual support of those who helped me in getting my
internship at the place I desired, which include my uncle Shailesh, UTV Distribution head Aditi,
and Ms Sangeeta and Ms Archana from Kalpathi Investments, the place where I interned. There
are two people whom I hold special regards for, marketing head and internship project
coordinator Mr. Sharad and project supervisor Mr. Saravanan, from Kalpathi Investments. I
would also like to thank Mr. Joyson, theatre owner and manager, and Mr. Dinesh, theatre
manager at AGS Villivakkam, for facilitating my project by allowing me to conduct interviews
during movie intervals inside theatre halls.
There are a few people whom I want to mention with special regards - my aunt Vanaja,
grandaunt Hema, uncle Ramesh and Shailesh, for welcoming me with open arms to their homes
during my two month stay at Chennai. And I owe everything to my dad and mum, who
supported me emotionally and financially, making my trip truly worth its time.
Index
Introduction Page 4
Objectives Page 6
Methodology Page 7
Age and Gender Based Information Page 17
Safety Concern for Women Patrons at AGS Villivakkam Page 20
Visit Frequency Based Information Page 22
AGS Closest Competitors at Villivakkam and Navallur Page 24
Parking at AGS Navallur and Villivakkam Page 28
Ticket Booking Mode Page 40
Auditorium Experience Page 44
3D Response at AGS Cinemas Page 47
Frequent Patrons and Sound Quality Response Page 48
Seating Comfort At AGS Navallur Page 49
Lobby Ambience at AGS Cinemas Page 53
Concessions Rating Page 56
Washroom Maintenance Page 63
Source of Knowledge Of AGS Cinemas Page 65
Contests, Promotional Activities, Communication Problem and Customer Inquiry Page 66
Recommendations Page 71
Appendix Page 81
Introduction
Founded by brothers and business mavericks Aghoram, Ganesh and Suresh Kalpathi in the year
2009, Chennai’s AGS Cinemas Pvt. Limited is business conglomerate Kalpathi Investments’
recent business venture into the field of film exhibition; the conglomerate has already made a
name in film production and film distribution with AGS Entertainment Pvt. Limited, producing
Thamizh films such as Yudham Sei, Thiruttu Pavale, Madraspattinam, Irumbu Kootai Murattu
Singam, Santosh Subramaiam, Avan Evam, Engeyum Kadhal, Vellore Mavattam and
distributing films like Myna.
Currently operating two multiplexes in Navallur and Villivakkam areas of Chennai, the long
term aim of AGS Cinemas is to ‘expand its multiplex business to a hundred screens across
Chennai’, according to Ms. Archana Kalpathi, CEO of AGS Cinemas Pvt. Limited.
Snagging the advantage of location in both Navallur, a rapidly modernizing area and
Villivakkam, comparatively an economically backward area with no other major source of
entertainment, AGS Cinemas has formulated different 4P strategies depending on target audience
at these areas; for example, the prices of concessions (food and beverages) at AGS Navallur are
higher than the prices at Villivakkam.
However, the audience response towards AGS has been average in the three years following its
commencement, with the theatre raking average business on most days and highly dependent on
weekend response and movie popularity. External factors such as lack of development in
Coromandel Plaza, the mall inside which AGS Navallur is situated, and the presence of a local
wine shop right across AGS Villivakkam, have had an effect on business. The brand name of
AGS isn’t as well known as premier multiplexes such as Sathyam Cinemas either, and there is a
threat of new multiplexes with greater attractions opening up in nearby areas. In this case, it is
necessary for AGS Cinemas to formulate short term and long-term strategies to create a better
value in the market. For this, it needs to understand the customer satisfaction levels with AGS
Cinemas in order to improve on its weaknesses and work out new opportunities.
While a mystery audit (selected patrons instructed to act in accordance with the form provided to
them) had already been conducted by AGS Cinemas, at no point in the three years was a survey
conducted to measure customer satisfaction with the different facilities provided by AGS
Cinemas. As a part of my internship project, I was assigned to design a survey, conduct it among
AGS patrons at Navallur and Villivakkam, evaluate the data and present a report along with
suggestions.
The areas covered in the survey include ticket booking and ticket collection process, theatre
experience (picture quality, sound quality, air-conditioning, and seating arrangement), lobby
ambience, concessions, washroom, parking, customer inquiry. The results drawn out from the
data collected have been used to measure response and make suggestions for enhancing or
improving customer experience quality at AGS Cinemas. Recommendations provided may be
useful for the marketing, HR, financing areas at AGS Cinemas.
Objectives
1) To understand the distribution of patrons at AGS Cinemas based on gender, age, area of
residence and visit frequency to draw inferences on demographic characteristics,
behavioral pattern and customer expectations regarding facilities at AGS
2) To analyze threats posed by location based competitive forces
3) To evaluate customer response towards ticket booking and parking facility at AGS and
make necessary recommendations
4) To measure customer response towards quality of overall movie experience and make
necessary recommendations
5) To measure customer satisfaction regarding concessions offered at AGS Cinemas, with
necessary recommendations and suggestions
6) To evaluate maintenance at AGS Cinemas and make necessary recommendations
7) To address problems regarding communication at AGS Cinemas
8) To suggest possible attractions and facilities for AGS Cinemas
Methodology
The sample survey was conducted between 21st May and 21st June at AGS Navallur and AGS
Villivakkam on alternate days. The survey was conducted both on weekdays and weekends, and
divided into morning shows (between 10 am and 12 pm; only on weekends and weekday shows
started after 12 pm), afternoon shows (between 12 pm and 6 pm) and evening shows (6 pm
onwards). The sample size selected for the purpose of the survey was 150 respondents in total,
75 respondents from AGS Navallur and 75 from AGS Villivakkam.
An interview questionnaire was prepared for the purpose of the survey; questions regarding
personal information of the respondents, information on their experience at AGS Cinemas during
the date of visit or during their last visit in case of frequent patrons, and opinions and comments
about AGS Cinemas were included in the questionnaire.
Personal interview method was used to conduct the survey, and supplementary questions were
asked during the interview. A handful of respondents preferred to fill up their questionnaire
themselves (self enumeration). Personal interview was conducted either in English, Tamil or
Hindi, depending on the patrons.
The survey was either conducted a) after collecting tickets but before entering respective screen
or at the food counter located below AGS Cinemas at Navallur (in case of frequent patrons who
were well aware of AGS Cinemas; such respondents were only handed questionnaire if they
visited AGS Cinemas in the past one-two weeks) b) during the interval, either in lobby or inside
theatre hall (maximum patron response collected in this manner or c) after exit. The c) method
was discontinued after leading to a poor or no response, as a majority of patrons preferred
leaving the theatre immediately.
A mixture of open ended and close ended multiple choice questions (two-choice and multiple
choice), checklist questions and rating questions were asked in the questionnaire. The first 30
patrons at each theatre were selected on an equal 50:50 male: female ratio and the remaining 45
patrons at each theatre were selected on a randomly. Also, care was taken to ensure at least one
patron from the first four (14-18, 18-25, 26-35, 36-45) age groups and at least one from each
visit frequency (first time, occasional, frequent) for the first 30 users at each theatre, while the
rest of the respondents were randomly chosen.
Although the core audience at both theatres varied in terms of demographics, especially income
levels, a standard questionnaire was used for the survey. The final draft was the fourth draft
consisting close to 20 questions; the first draft had about 65 questions, the second 30+ while the
third had 25 questions. The ideal time for each respondent was kept as 3-4 minutes, therefore
some questions potentially useful for data analysis (for e.g. to know whether respondent came
alone, with family, friends or colleagues) had to be omitted.
The date and time of conducting the survey (and not show timing) were noted in the
questionnaire. In case the interview was conducted after the patrons purchased the tickets,
the screen number was noted down in case of any complaints specific in nature.
In case of background information of patrons,
1) the name of the patrons: asked for two purposes a) more credibility to survey and b)
for mailing purpose (offers etc) in the future by AGS Cinemas
2) Gender: male/female
3) Age category: a) 14 – 18 years b) 19 – 25 years c) 26 – 35 years d) 36 – 45 years and
e) 46 and above
4) Area of residence (along with supplementary question of nearby multiplexes and
reason for visiting AGS Cinemas
5) Email address (for further contact by AGS Cinemas regarding upcoming offers etc;
optional field)
Patrons were also asked the movie they were to watch or had watched at the time of
conducting the questionnaire basically in order to a) help in drawing inferences and b) to
refresh patrons’ minds about their movie viewing experience at AGS Cinemas.
To know whether patrons had specific complaints about 3D experience at AGS, a two
choice question was asked to know whether the film was in 2D or 3D (3D movie patrons
were asked supplementary questions regarding their 3D experience at AGS cinemas).
‘Visit frequency’ to AGS, which included 3 options: a) First Time Patrons b) Occasional
Patrons (once in a month or two) c) Frequent Patrons (2-3 times a month). In case patrons
did not visit theatres very often yet visited AGS Cinemas during most of their multiplex
visits, they were categorized into frequent patrons.
In the question ‘Heard about AGS’, patrons could select more than one option among a)
In Newspapers (Hindu/Thandai), b) Social Media (Facebook/Twitter), c) Through
Friends d) Hoardings and e) Any other. In case of newspapers and social media options,
patrons were asked to tick the source given within brackets. Through friends option is for
patrons who got to know about the latest films running at AGS Cinemas through friends.
Option 4 d) Hoardings includes patrons who’ve seen hoardings of AGS Cinemas in their
neighborhood. Option e) would be selected in case patrons have heard about AGS
Cinemas at other sources, including newspapers other than The Hindu and Daily Thandai,
sites other than Facebook and Twitter, persons other than friends etc.
Questions regarding the booking process at AGS Cinemas:
1) The first question in this section was to know how patrons booked their tickets: a)
Using AGS Website b) Using Websites other Than AGS Website (e.g. Book My
Show) or c) Using BO Counter. The patron should select the option that was used by
him to book tickets for the show on that day. Option c) is for patrons who did not use
online option that day and had arrived to the BO counter to book tickets (option a)
and b) users too would have to stand in queue to collect tickets; however, as they
booked online, they would have paid extra commission). Plus users will be charged
money for their 3D glasses online itself (Rs. 120 + Rs 30), in case of 3D booking.
2) In the next question, respondents were asked how long they had to wait in queue to
book or collect (in case of online booking) their tickets, with 3 options: a) 1 – 2
minutes, b) 3 – 5 minutes or c) More than 5 minutes. Here, respondents had only to
give an estimate of the time taken for them to enter the queue, inquire about available
movies and make booking.
3) To check respondents’ opinion of staff performance: a) Quick and Efficient or b)
Slow and Inefficient. Duties of staff at BO counter included greeting customer, asking
for movie to be booked, informing about availability of tickets and alternate shows in
case of inavailabity, confirming order, accepting money, entering order, storing
money in cash register and giving tickets, handing change (if required), and wishing
customer again. In case respondents found their response towards them lacking in
speed and efficiency, they would select the second option. Lastly, a customer could
give written recommendation regarding booking of tickets in the space provided.
The next section of questions gauges customers’ level of satisfaction with the movie
experience at AGS cinema, graded on 5 point Likert Scale (Very Poor: 1, Poor: 2,
Average: 3, Good: 4 and Great: 5). This set of questions includes picture quality, sound
quality, seat comfort, air conditioning effect and lobby ambience. Desired picture quality
should be without distortions, sound quality should be clear and not jarring, seats should
be clean and functioning properly (recliner facility), air conditioning effect should be
comfortable and lobby ambience includes cleanliness and good background music.
Although a separate question for recommendations was not included in this section, any
recommendations made were duly noted down by interviewer while conducting survey.
The next section of questions deals with concessions (food and beverages) facility at
AGS Cinemas:
1) The first two questions inquire about respondents’ favorite food item and beverage
item in theatres in general. The purpose of this question is to understand customers’
tastes and preferences in order to make recommendations for AGS cinemas.
2) The next four questions ask for respondents’ specific response towards menu variety,
serving quality, refreshment quality and staff helpfulness at concessions area of AGS
Cinemas. A 3 point Likert scale has been used (Low: 1, Average: 2, High: 3)
Menu variety includes available food and beverage options at AGS cinemas; a
low variety indicates that additional items can be introduced.
Refreshment quality: hot refreshments have to be served adequately warm,
fresh and be tasty, and similarly cold beverage has to be served adequately
chilled, fresh and be tasty.
Refreshment quantity: for the given price, if the serving quantity is adequate.
Staff helpfulness: greeting patron, taking order, directing to delivery counter
(in case of AGS Navallur, which has separate counters for order and delivery),
handing order, taking money, giving bill and change.
3) Patrons were provided space to include any recommendations specifically for the
concessions area, especially considering their responses to the questions above.
The next set of questions dealt with customer satisfaction level towards the parking
facility provided at AGS Cinemas. Here, it should be noted that the parking area at AGS
Navallur is owned by Coromandel Plaza, the mall inside which the multiplex is situated.
AGS Villivakkam has its own two-floored underground parking area.
1) The first question was to know whether the respondent used private or public
transport to reach AGS Cinemas. Public transport commuters who had not used
parking facility could skip this set of questions (they could make recommendations
however in the comments section at the end of the questionnaire).
2) Private transport users were then asked the type of transport vehicle used to reach
AGS Cinemas: a) two wheeler or b) four wheeler. Furthermore, the two wheeler
private transport commuters had to specify whether they came by scooter or
motorbike, while four wheeler private transport commuters had to specify whether
they came in a regular car, SUV or a minivan. This segmentation was based on the
space required for the vehicles (for e.g. regular cars require lesser space than SUVs or
minivans)
3) The next four questions yielded customer response towards four key factors affecting
parking satisfaction:
Parking difficulty: whether customer faced any difficulty while parking
during entry or removing vehicle during exit. Includes customer entry to
parking area, collecting parking ticket, storing car at designated spot,
taking out car and heading out of parking area. Respondents would choose
between a) Not at all b) Sometimes and c) Everytime. The option however
was found unsuitable for first time patrons.
Parking Space: whether the parking space allotted for a vehicle was
adequate or not. Inadequate parking space could invariably be a cause of
parking difficulty. Respondents would choose between a) Adequate and b)
Inadequate.
Parking Price: whether the parking price for two wheelers (Rs. 30 for
movie hours + Rs. 5 for every additional hour) or four wheelers (Rs. 40
for movie hours + Rs. 10 for every additional hour) was reasonable, high
or very high. Patrons were directed to make decision after considering the
parking space and parking ease.
Parking Security: whether the security level (security personnel and
security arrangement at the parking facility) at the parking area was a)
sufficient or b) insufficient
The last two areas covered under the survey included washroom maintenance and
customer telephone inquiry service provided at AGS Cinemas. For washroom
maintenance, respondents had to choose between a) Low b) Average and c) High, while
for customer telephone inquiry service, a choice was to be made from a) Poor b) Average
and c) Good. Selection of criteria for washroom maintenance depended on general
maintenance, health and hygiene standards and availability of essential facilities inside
washroom.
Respondents could make final suggestions, recommendations, queries or complaints in
the space provided.
Age and Gender Based Information
Table 1 and Table 2 showing distribution of males and females according to age groups at AGS
Villivakkam and AGS Navallur respectively
Data
AGS Visited Gender Age No of respondentsProportion of respondents
Villivakkam Female 14 – 18 years 4 5% 19 – 25 years 12 16% 26 – 35 years 10 13% 36 – 45 years 2 3% 46 and above 1 1% Female Total 29 39% Male 14 – 18 years 7 9% 19 – 25 years 17 23% 26 – 35 years 13 17% 36 – 45 years 5 7% 46 and above 4 5% Male Total 46 61%Villivakkam Total 75 100.00%Grand Total 75 100.00%
Data
AGS Visited Gender Age No of respondents Proportion of respondentsNavallur Female 14 – 18 years 2 3% 19 – 25 years 25 33% 26 – 35 years 7 9% 36 – 45 years 5 7% 46 and above 1 1% Female Total 40 53% Male 14 – 18 years 2 3% 19 – 25 years 15 20% 26 – 35 years 14 19% 36 – 45 years 1 1% 46 and above 3 4% Male Total 35 47%Navallur Total 75 100.00%Grand Total 75 100.00%
The table shows that a larger number of respondents in Villivakkam are men (61% men and
39% women), while the respondents in Navallur include more women yet the proportion of
women and men respondents in Navallur are near equal (53% women and 47% men).
The reason for more male respondents at Villivakkam is that the male patrons coming to the
theatre were much higher than female patrons (as observed from graph, as observed while
conducting the survey and on basis of security guard’s observation at Villivakkam).
When gender is taken as a variable, data at Villivakkam may be largely affected by the response
of men.
In AGS Navallur, female respondents were higher than male respondents but the ratio of female
to male respondents is very close and so the data will not be skewed more based on female
respondents (female respondents – 53% and male respondents 47%).
In AGS Navallur, the larger respondents are in 19 – 25 age bracket (25 men + 15 women). It was
observed while conducting the survey that a large number of patrons who use the food court
below AGS cinemas and many of the patrons included couples.
The presence of a food court on the third floor with a large area for seating and items such as
pizzas, egg curries, ice creams and Chinese food makes it a meeting spot for many couples at
AGS Navallur. Villivakkam has no such food courts and is only for theatre viewing (although it
does have Vasant Bhavan, a family restaurant at the back , which serves south Indian, Punjabi
and Chinese food). Also, there is no seating space at Villivakkam except the seats at the theatre
hall.
The table 3 below gives a summary of the age and gender based distribution of respondents at
AGS Navallur and AGS Villivakkam respectively
Female
AGS Statistic Mean Age Median Mode
Standard Deviation in years Skewness Moment 2 Moment 3
Navallur 26.2125 22.42683 7.732147 0.489601 59.78609 636.5549Villivakkam 26.36207 24.1 7.9034 0.286215 62.46373 516.4702
Female (Contd)AGS Statistic Moment 4 Beta1 Beta2 Gamma 1 Gamma 2Navallur 14707.62 1.896143 4.114738 1.377005 1.114738 Leptokurtic Peaked Villivakkam 16302.26 1.094477 4.178227 1.046173 1.178227 Leptokurtic Peaked
Male
AGS Statistic Mean Age Median Mode
Standard Deviation in years Skewness Moment 2 Moment 3
Navallur 28.02857 25 8.603108 0.352032 74.01347 840.7345Villivakkam 27.97826 23.5 9.898922 0.452399 97.98866 870.8091
Male (Contd.)AGS Statistic Moment 4 Beta1 Beta2 Gamma 1 Gamma 2 Curve Type Top ShapeNavallur 24324.7 1.743354 4.44044 1.320361 1.44044 Leptokurtic Peaked
Villivakkam 28660.63 0.805969 2.984929 0.897758 -0.01507 PlatykurticFlat-Topped
The average age of male respondents is 27-28 years while female respondents is 26 years
approximately. Positive skewness in all four cases above implies that the density of respondents
higher towards the lower age-groups of 14-18, 19-25 and 26-35 years. Villivakkam has higher
number of male respondents and the distribution based on age-groups is flatter, hence meaning
that patrons from all age-groups visit the theatre. In other cases, it is 19-25 and 26-35 age group
audiences visiting AGS Navallur and AGS Villivakkam.
Safety Concern of Women Patrons at AGS Villivakkam
Many of the women who entered either asked their spouses/male companion to fill up the
questionnaire for them or were women who came using private transport (65% or 19 women out
of 29). It should be observed that there is a local wine shop right opposite AGS Villivakkam (and
a bus depot behind) and therefore safety may be one concern especially for women coming to
AGS Villivakkam, and a higher women prefer using private transport while coming to
Villivakkam. Another thing to be noted that there are at least two female security guards at
Villivakkam and more than two female concessions staff.
Out of 10 female respondents in age bracket of 26 – 35 years, 9 used private transport to visit
AGS Villivakkam and there were no women in age bracket of 36 – 45 years and 46 and above
who used public transport to visit AGS Villivakkam. Out of 10 total female respondents using
public transport, 6 were in age bracket of 19 – 25 and 3 were in age bracket of 14 – 18 years and
while conducting survey, most of these women had either come for the afternoon show (up to 6
pm).
Is safety a concern for women at Villivakkam? Do women find it unsafe to visit AGS
Villivakkam, especially during evening shows? If yes, what steps can AGS Cinemas take to
ensure that women find it safer to visit the theatre, especially during evening shows? Also, are
female employees at AGS (especially security) armed to take appropriate measures in case of
any undesirable circumstances/behavior of patrons? Are there any female employees working in
evening shifts (6 pm to 2 am)?
Visit Frequency Based Information
Table 4 showing distribution of respondents based on ‘Visit Frequency’ to AGS Navallur and
AGS Villivakkam respectively
Data AGS Visited
No of
respondents
Proportion of
respondents
Total No of
respondents
Total
Proportion of
respondents
Visit to
AGS
Cinema Navallur Villivakkam Navallur Villivakkam
First
time 12 10 16% 13% 22 14.67%
In a
while 29 26 39% 35% 55 36.67%
Once in
a while 34 39 45% 52% 73 48.67%
Grand
Total 75 75 100% 100% 150 100.00%
Based on Visit To AGS cinemas, the table shows that ‘Once in a While / Frequent’ respondents
were the largest (73), followed by In a While / Occasional respondents ( 55) and First Time
respondents (22). At both Villivakkam and Navallur, the first time respondents are comparatively
very low compared to the other two types of respondents, yet the table shows that the percent of
first time respondents at Navallur is slightly higher than that of Villivakkam’s (12 to 10 or 16%
to 13%). While at Villivakkam, first time users = only 25.641 (Once in a While) users, at
Navallur, FT users = 30.137 (Once in a While users). Also, FT users Villivakkam = 38.46 (In a
While users), and FT users Navallur = 40% (In a While Users).
The data is more evenly distributed at Navallur, where the weight of In a While and Once in a
While respondents is closer; in Villivakkam, Once in A While respondents have largest weight,
significantly higher than first time and In a While users. The location of the cinema halls may be
a factor here, as Villivakkam is located in the interiors, surrounded mostly by lower-income
areas and a few areas with high income population, while Navallur is in the outskirts, located
inside a mall and mostly visited by employees and students who reside in areas (mostly
campus/hostels) nearby.
AGS’s closest competitors both at Villivakkam and Navallur
Location Graph (See Appendix)
AGS Villivakkam:
The graph shows that Villivakkam has the highest share of patrons coming from Anna Nagar
(23%) and Villivakkam (19%) itself. In areas close to Anna Nagar, there are a couple of other
theatres: Rohini Multiplex, Sangam Multiplex, EGA multiplex, Motcham Multiplex, Ganga
Multiplex, Devi Karumari Multiplex, Murugan Multiplex which are relatively unknown. Two
known multiplex include PVR cinemas and Fame National.
Distance From Anna Nagar West
PVR Multiplex: 4.5 kms
Fame National: 7.7 kms
AGS Villivakkam: 3.6 kms
So, there is a slight advantage of location for AGS in this case. Mr. Nithin, a resident of Anna
Nagar who visits AGS Cinemas frequently and is between age of 14 and 18 years, comments that
‘Sound quality at AGS Villivakkam is inferior compared to PVR’. For Anna Nagar locality, the
two best options which are near their locality include AGS Villivakkam and PVR cinemas.
The second largest share of patrons comes from the Villivakkam area. Here Villivakkam has a
large advantage of location as the nearest multiplex which has a name (based on ticket
availability on Book My Show and own site) is Abirami Mega Mall, which is still about 7.4 kms
away from Villivakkam.
The third largest share (8 respondents out of 75 or 10.6667%) comes from Kurattur, which is
close to 5-6 kms from AGS Villivakkam. According to Justdial.com, AGS Villivakkam is the
only major multiplex which is within the radius of 5 kms from Korattur. The other major
multiplex, S2 cinemas is 7 kms to 10 kms away from Korattur.
The fourth and fifth largest share of respondents comes from Mogappair West (7%) and
Ambattur (5%) respectively. In case of Mogappair West, Fame multiplex is the closest option
which falls within 5 kms range (AGS Villivakkam comes within 7-8 kms range) whereas in case
of Ambattur, AGS VIllivakkam is a closer option (8 kms approx.) than Fame (10 – 11 kms).
AGS Villivakkam’s main competitors based on location include PVR Cinemas, Fame Cinemas
and S2 Cinemas.
AGS Navallur:
AGS Navallur on the other hand had the largest respondents coming from Velachery (6 out of
75). The area is about 18 kms away from AGS Navallur and the reason for most to choose this
cinema would be nearness to workplace. The other major multiplexes closer to Velachery
include Fame, PVR and Sathyam; however, these multiplexes are on the other side of Velachery
which may make it a longer distance to travel from workplace.
The major threat AGS Navallur can face is the opening of LUXE Imax Cinemas shortly, which
is a part of Sathyam Cinemas and will open in Velachery area itself.
The second highest response comes from Navallur, Shollinganallur and Thoraipakkam (5 each
out of 75). AGS OMR has a stronghold in Navallur and nearby areas, including OMR road,
Kelambakkam, Shollinganallur and Sisuseri because of nearness of location. The competition is
faces from long running Maayajaal multiplex is negligible because AGS Cinemas has better
facilities and is relatively less remote in terms of location than Maayajaal Cinemas.
For residents of Thoraipakam, S2 Theyagaraja (part of Sathyam Chain) is the closest popular
option (about 6.5 km approx.). However S2 Theyagaraja is towards the direction of Adyar,
directly opposite to the direction of AGS cinemas (which is about 10.5 km in the other direction
of Thoraipakkam). One of these respondents explicitly said that he comes to AGS Cinemas due
to nearness to office, and it may be possible (observing the distance of AGS cinemas from the
area) that the respondents from this area visit AGS due to nearness to office. The opening of
LUXE cinemas in Velachery may or may not pose a big threat in this case as it is close to 9.6 km
in the other direction (towards Adyar).
Thus, while AGS OMR remains relatively immune from competition due to a favorable location,
its threat would come in the form of LUXE cinemas in the area of Velachery. LUXE cinemas is
the first IMAX cinemas from Sathyam which is coming up in the Phoenix market city in
Velachery; it’s said on Wikipedia that the multiplex shall have 11 screens. Promotions have
already begun on social networking sites such as Facebook. AGS may lose patrons from areas
such as Velachery and Adambakkam, which are very close to LUXE cinemas.
Parking at AGS Navallur and Villivakkam
Table 5 and 6 showing mode of transport used by respondents to AGS Villivakkam and AGS
Navallur respectively
Data
AGS Visited Mode of transport Number of respondents Proportion of
respondentsVillivakkam Private 53 71% Public 20 27%
(blank) 2 3%Villivakkam Total 75 100.00%Grand Total 75 100.00%
AGS Visited Mode of transport Number of respondentsProportion of
respondentsNavallur Private 41 55% Public 29 39% (blank) 5 7%Navallur Total 75 100.00%Grand Total 75 100.00%
AGS Villivakkam has a larger number of respondents who commuted using private transport
(71%) while only 55% of the respondents at AGS Navallur used private transport. The
respondents using public transport in Navallur is relatively high (39%) with 29 respondents.
In Villivakkam, most of the respondents even in the age bracket of 19-25 years used private
transport; 11 respondents in the 19-25 age bracket used public transport while 17 in the same
bracket used private transport. Of the 19 respondents who came on motorbike to AGS
Villivakkam (18 male, 1 female), 2 were in 14-18 age bracket, 8 in 18-25 age bracket, 8 in 26-35
age bracket and 1 in 36-45 age bracket. 10 respondents used scooter in two wheeler transport to
Villivakkam.
The highest respondents who used public transport in Navallur fall in the age bracket of 19 – 25
years. In the other cases, most of the respondents used private transport to visit AGS, with the
second highest respondents who used public transport existing in the 26-35 age bracket. Out of
14 respond All 14 respondents who came on motorbike to AGS Navallur (10 male, 4 female)
were from 2 age brackets: a) 18-25 years (8) and b) 26 – 35 years (6). Only three respondents
used scooter in Navallur.
In four wheeler, the maximum respondents were from age groups 26-35 (9 in AGS Navallur, 9 in
AGS Villivakkam) followed by 19-25 years (7 Navallur, 6 Villivakkam) and 36-45 years (5 in
both multiplexes).
While only three respondents (1 in Navallur, 1 in Villivakkam) found the four-wheeler parking
price to be high, 9 respondents in AGS Navallur (8 from a)18-25 and b)26-35 age groups) and 8
in Villivakkam found parking price to be on higher side.
AGS PARKING VERDICT: (PARKING DIFFICULTY, PARKING SPACE, PARKING
PRICE, PARKING SECURITY)
35(87.5%)
2(5%)
3(7.5%)
AGS PARKING DIFFICULTY: NAVALUR
Not at AllSometimes Everytime
41 (77.36%)
5 (9.43%)
7 (13.21%)
AGS PARKING DIFFICULTY: VILLIVAKKAM
Not At All Sometimes Everytime
40 (97.56%)
1 (2/40%)
AGS PARKING SPACE: NAVALUR
Adequate Inadequate
45(84.01%)
8(15.09%)
AGS PARKING SPACE: VILLIVAKKAM
Adequate Inadequate
31 (77.5%)
8(20%)
1(2.5)
AGS PARKING PRICE: NAVALUR
Reasonable High Very High
46 (86.79%)
7(13.20%)
AGS PARKING PRICE: VILLIVAKKAM
Reasonable High Very High
40(100%)
AGS PARKING SECURITY: NAVALUR
SufficientInsufficient
43(86%)
7(14%)
AGS PARKING SECURITY: VILLIVAKKAM
SufficientInsufficient
In terms of parking price at Villivakkam, 6 out of the 7 respondents who found the parking price
high brought four wheeler. Their complaint is that the parking price increase from Rs 30 to Rs 40
is not reasonable. One respondent said that he found the price unreasonable because this was a
theatre located in the outskirts, and therefore asking a parking fee that’s too high. AGS
Villivakkam manager Mr. Dinesh explains that the increasing parking costs are due to the rising
trends in general price level.
AGS Villivakkam parking scores worse than AGS Navallur in 3 areas: parking difficulty,
parking space and parking security. Despite greater respondents in Villivakkam, lesser
respondents found parking price to be on higher side. Thus, the main concern here is to improve
parking facilities before in terms of parking space, navigation in and out of parking area, and
parking security.
4 of the respondents who used two wheeler parking recommended that a ‘shade’ be kept in the
two wheeler parking zone, especially during rains. While shade wasn’t the problem for 4 wheeler
parking respondents, at least 8 complained that the parking area became congested, especially
during rains and weekends. ‘The approach road to AGS Villivakkam is narrow’ remarked Kas, a
respondent and Mr. Mahadevan, another respondent agrees with him, while S. Sivakumar said
that the ‘Booking process was too long’.
BOOKING PROCESS AT AGS VILLIVAKKAM:
Enter queue --- Book Tickets --- Take Car to Parking Zone --- Park Car at Allotted Space
--- Watch Movie --- Re-enter parking Zone --- Pay Amount --- Remove Car
Cars are halted temporarily near roadside until tickets are booked at the BO, after which the
patron enters the parking area in the basement along with his tickets, shows the tickets to the
parking attendant (who notes down the show timing, for which a fixed amount of Rs 40 is
charged) and then parks his car in the allotted area depending on the movie he has purchased
tickets for. In case the patron does not take his car out after the show ends, he is charged Rs 10
for each hour the car is kept inside. There is a same entry and exit for the parking area at AGS
Villivakkam.
The same process is done in case of two wheelers, except that they are either parked in the area
to the left and right side of AGS Cinemas or outside in the parking area of AGS cinemas. Mr.
Vinodkumar, a respondent believes that having 2 or 3 separate areas for bike parking causes
much confusion and suggests that there be a common area for bike parking.
This lengthy process has been decided due to the ‘lack of space inside the parking lot’ as told by
Mr. Dinesh. Current parking facility for 4 wheeler includes a two leveled underground parking
lots. However, since there is no separate lane for queuing up cars that enter parking area, the four
wheelers end up blocking the main road.
Confronting patrons who try to leave the theatre about parking the vehicle after their movie gets
over creates a negative impression in the minds of people, especially when wrongly confronted.
Also, patron who have to wait for a longer time before their movie begins and who need to park
their vehicles will not take kindly that they are being charged more. Mr. Kamath, a frequent
patron to AGS Villivakkam complains that ‘Parkng attendant is rude and mannerless. Asks to
pay Rs 50 just because he is 25 minutes early (i.e. before show timing)’.
Pros:
a) Only those who have booked tickets already can enter parking zone.
b) Parking rate is fixed upon movie visited, irrespective of length of movie
c) Parking space allotted depending on the movie visited
d) Movies with larger audience allotted more parking space
e) Locating car becomes easier
Cons
a) As approach road is narrow, cars waiting outside block the road especially during
weekends
b) When crowded, difficulty may arise between patrons parking their vehicle and patrons
removing their vehicles (4 wheelers) at the same time
c) Patrons who have used internet to book tickets (especially AGS website) find that their
effort to book tickets online doesn’t save time (as parking time is the same)
d) The fact that the same rate is charged for a short movie (a 1 ½ hr English film) and a long
Tamil/Hindi film (2 ½ to 3 hrs) is not reasonable. While other theatres such as Abirami
charge a fixed rate for certain hours, thus reducing the length of booking process as
patrons need not stop to collect tickets first, AGS Villivakkam isn’t applying this method
as its located in interiors where parking space outside theatre itself is very less.
e) The process may be longer in case a patron takes time to decide the movie he/she wants
to book
Ticket Booking Mode
AGS Website Other Than AGS Website
BO Counter05
101520253035404550
1511
49
AGS Villivakkam
AGS Villivakkam
AGS Website Other Than AGS Website
BO Counter Blank 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
21 22
31
1
AGS Navallur
AGS Navallur
The graphs show higher rate of respondents booking tickets prior to reaching theatre at AGS
Navallur through internet booking facility either through AGS Website of third-party sites such
as Book My Show (21 + 22 = 43 out of 75 or 57.33%). On the other hand, booking prior to
reaching theatre was comparatively lower at AGS Villivakkam (15+11=26 out of 75 or 34.67%).
Larger respondents at Navallur are willing to pay a higher price in order to purchase the ticket
(Rs.120 + extra charges) than the respondents at Villivakkam.
Another trend observed based on age-group division of respondents booking a) tickets before
entering BO Counter and b) Booking Tickets at BO counter is that AGS Navallur has more
respondents in the age group 26-35 years booking before BO (17 as compared to 4 who booked
at BO counter) while an increasing ratio of ‘Before Entering BO counter’ respondents at AGS
Villivakkam was only observed in age group 36-45 (4 as compared to 3 who booked at BO
counter) and 46 and above (3 as compared to 2). In the 19-25 age group, almost an equal amount
of ‘Before BO’ and ‘At BO’ respondents (19::20) at AGS Navallur while at AGS Villivakkam
‘AT BO’ respondents were considerably higher (6::23).
.
It can therefore be assumed that greater respondents at AGS Navallur in 19-25 years and higher
age groups use online booking to a greater extent. This trend can only be seen in age groups
above 35 years in a case of AGS Villivakkam.
The AGS website seems to be a common complaint among many of the users. There were
thirteen comments and suggestions received from AGS Navallur respondents and 7 from
Villivakkam respondents. Also it is important to note that all the website related complaints were
mostly from 2 age groups: 19-25 and 26-35 age groups. One complaint came from 14-18
respondent.
While website loading problem was the common complaint from most of these respondents, the
26-35 year age group also wanted new facilities such as:
a) Internet Banking (When Finance manager at Kalpathi Investment asked why internet
banking was not provided, he replied it was because ‘handling the facility was difficult’;
also learnt that from Mr. Ramesh, an ICICI manager that net banking would be an
infeasible option citing problems regarding immediate transfer and bank hours)
b) Payback Reward Points (Can be introduced with the 25 Frame Card which AGS has
planned to introduce)
c) More time before booking confirmation expires
d) Advance Ticket Booking (Booking usually opens just one-two days before premiere)
Some commented that the look and feel of the website should improve. There were three
respondents who felt that the website GUI needs to be changed, and that the image heavy
website made it slow on many internet connections, and in devices such as tablets and mobile
phones. For a website that seems designed suited for young audiences, the complaints from these
respondents speak their verdict on the website.
Nearly all the AGS Villivakkam respondents who complained about the website said it was slow
and not user friendly. The same can be said for AGS Navallur respondents, but some from these
also added suggestions for the website.
Auditorium Experience
To measure the overall audience satisfaction with the auditorium based on four criteria a) Picture
Quality, b) Sound Quality, c) Seat Comfort and d) Lobby Ambience, a Likert Scale ranging from
a) Very Poor (1 point) b) Poor (2 point) c) Average (3 point) d) Good (4 point) and e) Very Good
(5 point) was chosen for evaluating individual and overall satisfaction with auditorium facilities.
On the basis of the data, statistical analysis was performed to find out a) mean b) median/mode
c) Standard Deviation d) Skewness e) Moments and f) Kurtosis, in order to gain a clearer
understanding of audience response towards theatre facilities.
Table 7 and 8 showing overall audience level of satisfaction with auditorium experience at AGS
Villivakkam and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Villivakkam StatisticCriteria
Mean Median Mode Standard Deviation
Skewness 2nd Moment
3rd Moment
Picture Quality 4.11 4 4 0.505 0.211 0.255 0.024Sound Quality 3.93 4 4 0.638 -0.105 0.407 0.015Seat Comfort 3.91 4 4 0.733 -0.127 0.538 -0.422Air Conditioning 4.11 4 4 0.531 0.201 0.282 0.015
AGS Villivakkam (Contd) Statistic
Criteria
4th Moment
Beta 1 Beta 2
Gamma 1 Gamma 2 Curve Type
Top Shape
Picture Quality 0.239 0.034 3.667 0.184 0.667 Leptokurtic PeakedSound Quality 0.407 0.004 2.46 0.059 -0.54 Leptokurtic Flat
ToppedSeat Comfort 1.641 1.143 5.67 1.069 2.67 Leptokurtic PeakedAir Conditioning 0.267 0.01 3.364 0.102 0.364 Leptokurtic Slightly
Peaked
AGS Navallur StatisticCriteria
Mean Median Mode Standard Deviation
Skewness 2nd Moment
3rd Moment
Picture Quality 3.96 4 4 0.56 -0.073 0.313 -0.085Sound Quality 3.96 4 4 0.56 -0.073 0.313 -0.002Seat Comfort 3.36 3 Bi-Modal 0.898 -1.191 0.805 -0.384Air Conditioning
3.85 4 4 0.512 -0.291 0.262 -0.11
AGS Navallur (Contd.) Statistic
Criteria
4th Moment
Beta 1 Beta 2
Gamma 1 Gamma 2
Curve Type Top Shape
Picture Quality 0.462 0.232 4.708 0.482 1.708 Leptokurtic PeakedSound Quality 0.311 0.0001 3.172 0.014 0.172 Leptokurtic Slightly
Peaked Seat Quality 2.166 0.284 3.345 0.533 0.345 Platykurtic Slightly
PeakedAir Conditioning 0.346 0.672 5.045 0.82 2.045 Leptokurtic Peaked
The overall average of movie experience at AGS Villivakkam (4.015) is higher than AGS
Navallur (3.7825). It should be noted here that in the case of Navallur, there were blank
responses (2,2,2 and 1 in case of picture quality, sound quality, seat comfort and air-conditioning
respectively), and these have been omitted from calculation, which would otherwise have shown
lower statistical information.
As the table shows, with the exception of sound quality, the mean average of picture quality, air-
conditioning and seating comfort especially is lower at AGS Navallur. One reason for this may
be attributed to the demographic characteristic of patrons at AGS cinemas. The areas
surrounding AGS Villivakkam, including Villivakkam itself, are populated by lower income and
middle income group to a greater extent whose needs are easier to satisfy than those of AGS
Navallur patrons. Navallur has been described by one patron as one of the fast growing areas in
Chennai with state of the art residential facilities and burgeoning industries. Higher income
groups usually populate the surrounding areas, and there are a number of big offices and
universities close to Navallur. The expectations of these respondents would be inevitably higher,
especially when it comes to quality and comfort.
With the exception of seat comfort at AGS Navallur, the rest of the data show a leptokurtic
distribution (peaked). Distribution is flatter at AGS Navallur because there were equal number of
‘average’ and ‘good’ responses respectively. Also, the skewness is higher only in this case
because of a bi-modal distribution.
The individual data for each of the criteria mentioned above are given in the appendix. Special
emphasis has been given in the pages below to certain factors related to auditorium experience.
3D Response At AGS Cinemas
3D glasses are to be collected at the concessions counter both at AGS Villivakkam and AGS
Navallur. A similar process is done at PVR Cinemas, but in case of PVR cinemas the glasses are
actually purchased by the patrons. In case of AGS cinemas, not only is there no purchase (the
glasses have to be returned once the patrons exit the theatre hall) but there’s a good amount
which is charged for the glasses that’s non-refundable (Rs 30).
There is a common complaint regarding the 3D quality itself, with many patrons feeling that the
money is unreasonably charged for a 3D quality which is unsatisfactory. An AGS staff tells that
‘each 3D glass’ is close to Rs 2000 and of great quality. But that does not stop respondents from
saying that ‘they’re not satisfied with 3D. 3D glass expensive because it is non-refundable’ ‘3D
not good. Glasses scratched’, ‘3D Glasses smudged’, ‘3D not good’.
Frequent Patrons And Sound Quality Response
A majority of the audience at Villivakkam among males were ‘Once in A While’ users (28 out of
46), with 6 coming from Anna Nagar. Among these users, the common complaint was the sound
quality, which many found to be either inaudible or inferior when compared with Satyam or
Escape Cinemas. Considering ‘Frequent’ male patrons are the largest audience and share a
common complaint regarding the sound quality, AGS should make arrangements to upgrade its
surround sound system at Villivakkam.
Seating Comfort at AGS Navallur
Common complaints regarding seats at AGS Navallur:
Seats are torn
Uncomfortable hand-rest
Unsatisfactory push-back facility
Seats are shaky
Seats are damaged; cause a headache
50% (6 out of 12) of the patrons who visited AGS Navallur the first time rated the seats are
average while 25% (3 out of 12) rated it as good.
Among ‘in a while/occasional’ patrons, it’s found that 11 patrons rated the seats as good and the
same number of patrons found the seats to be average. The same way, the proportion of patrons
rating the seats as poor and great is also equal (10% each).
Among frequent patrons, the highest number of patrons rated the seats as ‘good’ (44%), followed
by ‘Average’ (35%), followed by poor (12%) and very poor (6%). Only one respondent in this
group rated the seat comfort as great.
A first time patron to AGS Navallur who responded to the questionnaire said that ‘While seats
are comfortable, the fact that they are torn gives a poor impression of maintenance at AGS
Cinemas’. Another patron Dr. Meera Nayak, a Thoraipakkam resident who visits AGS Navallur
frequently observes that ‘General maintenance at AGS has deteriorated since last year’. These
statements and the data support my assumptions that a) Torn and damaged seats will create a bad
impression among first time patrons and b) Frequent users shall be concerned about maintenance
at AGS Cinemas and may switch in case another multiplex in a nearby area maintains its theatres
better.
Another assumption that complaints about torn seats and lack of maintenance shall spread on
social networking sites and review sites like wildfire also holds true. Some of the complaints
posted online about seating at AGS Navallur:
‘the place is awfully maintained and super dirty...’ – djrocks2983, http://chennai.burrp.com
‘Seats are worst,, All seats are damaged..’ – Ramnath Boobalan, Google Plus
‘Inside AGS,Navallur for # Thillu Mullu - Must say the seats are getting from bad to worse!’ –
Venkatesvaran, Twitter user
‘Its sad to see that so many seats r torn. Plz do replace thm’ – Don Deepak, Twitter user
Some of the positive reviews about seat comfort online say that while the seats are torn, they still
give adequate comfort:
‘it is a nice place where you can sit comfortably and watch a movie’ – Sonika,
http://yellowpages.sulekha.com
‘Most comfortable seats in the country’ – Harsha Kondapalli, Google Plus
‘…seating is really very comfortable’ – Hemant Thakkar, http://yellowpages.sulekha.com
While many choose to post their grievance about seat quality at AGS cinemas on the internet and
social networking site, most do not complain unless asked. However, the statistics show that
there is an implied dissatisfaction with the seat quality among most patrons. Based solely on
comfort, the seats at Navallur are of better quality and give better comfort than those at AGS
Villivakkam. However, the complaints at Villivakkam about seat quality are negligible and
mainly deal with ‘seats being narrow’ or ‘better recliners’.
With time, maintenance costs for repairing the seats will also rise due to frequent use. Hence it is
advisable that the seats be maintained on a periodical basis or based on certain
qualitative/quantitative standards.
Current update from AGS is that ‘All seats shall be renovated by September’ (as tweeted by Ms.
Archana Kalpathi). However, a few months before, Archana Kalpathi had tweeted that the seats
and lighting would be taken care of by July. It is now imperative that the seats be soon renovated
and proper and regular maintenance is undertaken.
Lobby Ambience at AGS Cinemas
Following the distribution in the mystery audit conducted by AGS Cinemas, lobby ambience has
been taken separately from auditorium experience.
Lobby area in AGS Navallur is on a single floor, consisting of an entry opening out to the lobby
after the security screening and the lobby area itself. There is a triangular concessions counter in
the center of the lobby. There is the lounge area to the right and back corners of the lobby area,
and a play area to the left of the entrance, opposite to the gents’ washroom. The play area has
toys and attractions for kids between the age 3 and 6. No AGS employee has been assigned for
the play area.
The lounge sofas were found to be torn badly in the beginning of the internship and refurbished
during the internship period; Mr. Joyson, the theatre manager at AGS Cinemas blamed unruly
patrons from nearby villages for causing this damage, along with damages to seats in the
auditorium.
Standees of upcoming films such as Smurfs 2 were placed at strategic locations (close to the
auditorium where 3D films were screened. Apart from this, other form of advertising (both
movie posters and general) in AGS Navallur lobby includes video wall, LCD branding pillar
branding, seat branding, kiosk placement and exit branding.
In AGS Villivakkam, the lobby extends to ground floor and second floor, while the first floor has
the office. There are two elevators and staircase for navigation. There is no seating arrangement
currently for patrons in the lobby area. Also, size of lobby is smaller and less sophisticated than
the lobby at AGS Navallur. Advertising in lobby include frontage, poster cases, box office
branding, pillar branding, seat branding, lift branding and backlit boards.
The following data measures customer satisfaction statistics towards lobby ambience at AGS
Villivakkam and AGS Navallur respectively. Tables with detailed information about customer
ratings are located in appendix.
Table 9 and 10 showing audience level of satisfaction with lobby ambience at AGS Villivakkam
and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Villivakkam
Statistic
Criteria
Mean Median Mode Standard Deviation
Skewness
Moment 2 Moment 3
Lobby Ambience
3.863014
4 4 0.603984 -0.2268 0.364796 -0.14888
AGS Villivakkam (contd.) Statistic
Criteria
Moment 4
Beta1 Beta2 Gamma 1
Gamma 2
Curve Type
Top Shape
Lobby Ambience
0.589324
0.456603
4.428463
0.675724 1.428463 Leptokurtic
Peaked
AGS Navallur Statistic
Criteria
Mean Median Mode Standard Deviation
Skewness
Moment 2 Moment 3
Lobby Ambience
4.013889
4 4 0.485714 0.028595 0.235918 0.004056
AGS Navallur (contd.) Statistic
Criteria
Moment 4
Beta1 Beta2 Gamma 1 Gamma 2 Curve Type
Top Shape
Lobby Ambience
0.235613
0.001253
4.233268
0.035399 1.233268 Leptokurtic
Peaked
The data shows that the lobby at AGS Navallur, predictably, has been better received than the
lobby at AGS Villivakkam.
Those among respondents at AGS Villivakkam who responded slightly negatively about the
lobby ambience complained about the lack of space and comfort in the lobby. Also respondents
complained that they had to wait outside after booking tickets and weren’t allowed to enter
inside the theatre until the movie was about to begin. This waiting time may lead to more crowd
gathering outside the theatre.
Concessions Rating
Concessions include food items (popcorn, puff, samosa, chaat items, sandwiches) and beverages
(cold-drinks, bottled water). The concessions at AGS Navallur are priced slightly higher than
AGS Villivakkam. Also, the menu variety is greater in AGS Navallur, with plans to open an ice-
cream concessions and hot snacks concessions in the future. AGS Villivakkam, on the other
hand, has a standard concessions menu items available in all multiplexes.
To measure the overall audience satisfaction with the concessions based on four criteria a) Menu
Variety, b) Serving Quantity, c) Refreshment Quality and d) Staff Helpfulness, a 3 Point Likert
Scale ranging from a) Low (1 point) b) Average (2 point) c) High (3 point) was chosen for
evaluating individual and overall satisfaction with concessions facilities. On the basis of the data,
statistical analysis was performed to find out a) mean b) median/mode c) Standard Deviation d)
Skewness e) Moments and f) Kurtosis, in order to gain a clearer understanding of audience
response towards theatre facilities. Tables with detailed information about concessions ratings
are located in appendix.
Table 11 and 12 showing audience level of satisfaction with concessions at AGS Villivakkam
and AGS Navallur respectively
Blank Responses in case of AGS Villivakkam are as follows (and these have been excluded from
measurement):
Menu Variety: 9
Serving Quantity: 11
Refreshment Quality: 8
Staff Helpfulness: 11
AGS Villivakkam Statistics
Criteria
Mean Median Mode Standard Deviation
Skewness 2nd Moment
3rd Moment
Menu Variety 2.212121 2 2 0.61583 0.344447 0.379247 -0.03876
Serving Quantity 2.453125 2 Bi-Modal
0.557048 0.813439 0.310303 -0.06173
Refreshment Quality
2.432836 2 3 0.604063 -0.93892 0.364892 -0.12207
Staff Helpfulness 2.609375 3 3 0.548213 -0.71254 0.300537 -0.16633
AGS Villivakkam (Contd) Statistics
Criteria
4th Moment
Beta 1 Beta 2 Gamma 1 Gamma 2 Curve Type
Top Shape
Menu Variety 0.352721 0.027546 2.452374 0.165969 -0.54763 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
Serving Quantity 0.20308 0.127535 2.109094 0.35712 -0.89091 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
Refreshment Quality
0.318316 0.306706 2.390727 0.55381 -0.60927 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
Staff Helpfulness 0.269804 1.019151 2.987115 1.00953 -0.01289 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
AGS Navallur Statistics
Criteria
Mean Median Mode Standard Deviation
Skewness 2nd Moment
3rd Moment
Menu Variety 2.074627 2 2 0.676105 0.110378 0.457117 -0.02813
Serving Quantity 2.469697 3 3 0.583087 -0.90947 0.339991 -0.113Refreshment Quality 2.439394 3 3 0.60625 -0.92471 0.367539 -
0.12992Staff Helpfulness 2.621212 3 3 0.515374 -0.73498 0.265611 -
0.11352
AGS Navallur (Contd) Statistics
Criteria
4th Moment
Beta 1 Beta 2 Gamma 1 Gamma 2 Curve Type
Top Shape
Menu Variety 0.455778 0.008283 2.18121 0.091013 -0.81879 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
Serving Quantity 0.274201 0.324923 2.372112
0.57002 -0.62789 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
Refreshment Quality 0.325921 0.33998 2.412709
0.583078 -0.58729 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
Staff Helpfulness 0.169666 0.687692 2.404939
0.829272 -0.59506 Platykurtic Flat-Topped
Blank Responses in case of AGS Villivakkam are as follows (and these have been excluded from
measurement):
Menu Variety: 8
Serving Quantity: 9
Refreshment Quality: 9
Staff Helpfulness: 9
The menu variety at the concessions counters at AGS Navallur and AGS Villivakkam are largely
rated ‘Average’ by respondents (53.7% at AGS Navallur and 57.5% at AGS Villivakkam find
the menu variety to be average). The table above shows that only in menu variety does the
median and mode ‘2’ (highest percent rating average) whereas in other cases, it is 3. Both are
positively skewed, hence they are more respondents towards ‘low’ and ‘average’, especially in
case of AGS Navallur, where the menu variety hasn’t been rated well despite it having greater
options than AGS Villivakkam. Both the multiplexes could do with improvement with menu
variety, especially AGS Navallur.
At least six customers suggested that the theatre add non vegetarian and egg-based food to their
menu. And it has been acknowledged by Mr. Joyson of AGS Cinemas that non-vegetarian food
can bring a lot of additional revenue to AGS; however, it is the conscious decision by the
management to restrict non-vegetarian food as the owners are pure vegetarians. On inspection, it
was found that the pastries served at AGS Cinemas are egg-based and there is no eggless option,
at least at AGS Villivakkam. This was brought to attention by Ms. Priyadarshani, who suggested
that eggless options be added for desserts.
There have also been demands from a couple of respondents from Navallur for ice-creams and
milkshakes, and according to Mr. Joyson, there shall soon be a counter for ice-creams. Its been
observed that it is the 19-25 group which frequents AGS Navallur more than the other age
groups; many of the patrons include young couples and college-going patrons from nearby areas.
The food court present on the floor below offers good-quality ice-cream; this food court is not a
part of AGS cinemas. It’s known that Coromandel Plaza does not have any other establishment
running currently except a gaming zone and a food court (with Chinese food, pizzas, curry items
and ice-cream) on the third floor and Dominoes on the ground floor, and some of the patrons
believe that the mall is very underdeveloped.
a) Varsha, a mother who brought along her kids to AGS Navallur, has a different complaint:
she believes that the quantity served at AGS Cinemas is too much. The table shows that
very few patrons thought that the serving quantity of their food items and beverages was
low. A quick observation of the serving size of popcorn can tell that quite a sufficient
amount of popcorn is given for the price of Rs 130. Varsha suggested this: Lesser price,
lesser quantity would be ideal. A 97 out of 150 respondents selected popcorn as their
favorite food item.
The statistics of ‘serving quantity’ at AGS Villivakkam seem problematic as the data above
shows a highly positive skewness (Mean>Median), whereas the distribution given in the
appendix clearly shows that the curve is skewed to the right side (negatively). This problem may
have risen because of the bi-modal value, and the median showing value 2 (n+1/2th observation
shows 32.5 which lies within the cumulative frequency of 33 that corresponds to the value 2).
The refreshment quality at both the theatres is rated between average and high, with a slightly
greater respondents rating high in both theatres.
At AGS Villivakkam, the respondents who felt the refreshment quality was low generally
complained that:
Food is stale (Ms. Kas, Mr. Kamath, Mr. Akbar, Ms.Rati) – The first two
respondents come in age bracket of ’46 and above’ and say that they don’t buy
from AGS concessions because the food is stale, while the third respondent is in
age bracket of 36-45 years who also prefers not to buy due to unsatisfactory
quality. Ms. Rati has a specific problem with the caramel popcorn, which she
feels gives a ‘medicinal taste’.
Age based division reveals that only one out seven in the age bracket of 36-45
thought the serving quality to be high.5 of the 7 respondents rated the serving
quality as average while one rated it low. One respondent Mr. Hassan suggested
that ‘Indian Hot snacks’ be added.
Four respondents specifically suggested that credit card facility be made available
at concessions area (3 respondents from Navallur, 1 from Villivakkam; 3 men, 1
woman). Either start this facility at concessions (‘currently not introduced as
there’s concern that it may not work properly at times or the staff may not be able
to use it properly’ – a vague reason given by an AGS employee) or introduce
something similar to Sathyam’s fuel cards where the amount is deposited
beforehand and purchases are made over time (Many who use public transport
may not want use cash as they may need it for transport expense). AGS could
limit credit card facility to one counter (at Navallur, there are four counters), and
keep a minimum amount for credit card facility to be accepted. As rates are higher
at Navallur and most of the crowd includes 19-25 and 26-35 patrons (with larger
spending activity), the minimum amount could be Rs. 400-Rs 500. Note: AGS
Cinemas is soon coming with 25 Frames, an ICashCard.
At Navallur, the respondents who rated the food quality as low are in age bracket of 19-25 and
26-35 and have a similar complaint as above that the ‘food is bad’. Those who rated the ‘food
quality’ as average either had specific complaints about some items (‘Better quality popcorn’) or
were disappointed that many of the items on the menu were unavailable when asked for.
A larger percent of respondents have rated staff helpfulness ‘high’ and there were very few
complains about operating staff in general.
Washroom Maintenance
Low
Average High
Navalur
05
10152025303540
8
22
35
AGS WASHROOM MAINTENANCE: NAVALUR
Number of respondents Total: 65
Low
Average High
Villivakkam
05
101520253035404550
214
46
AGS WASHROOM MAINTENANCE: VILLIVAKKAM
Number of respondents Total: 62
Out of 10 respondents (out of 150) who rated the washroom maintenance as low, 8 were women
and 7 of them were AGS Navallur respondents and common complaints among them include:
Insufficient Toilet Roll
Inadequate Water
Bad Odor
Toilets Unclean
The bad odor at the washrooms can be rectified by keeping air-freshener in toilets at all times,
especially inside ladies’ toilets, who are generally more concerned about hygiene. Patrons at
Navallur coming from high-income groups, especially female patrons, may expect higher level
of cleanliness and maintenance.
Another complaint is that there is no hand wash solution in AGS Villivakkam in the men’s
washroom. Lack of health and hygiene facilities will give AGS theatre a bad name, and by not
keeping hand solution (the reason given is that it was stolen on one occasion), AGS Villivakkam
is not maintaining proper health standards for obvious reasons (same patrons visit concessions
without properly washing their hands).
SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE OF AGS CINEMAS
In this question, respondents could select multiple options. 35 respondents (15 from AGS
Navallur, 20 AGS Villivakkam) selected ‘The Hindu’ as one of their sources of
knowledge of AGS Cinemas while 8 respondents selected ‘Daily Thandhi’ as their source
(6 out of the 8 were AGS Villivakkam respondents). 23 respondents selected Social
Networking Sites as their source of knowledge – 22 out of them selected ‘Facebook’. 79
respondents (44 from AGS Navallur, 35 from AGS Villivakkam) selected friends as their
source of knowledge of AGS cinemas. 12 respondents selected hoardings. 37 respondents
also had other sources: either they saw the theatre while passing by (it being near their
homes or offices) or they learned about it through colleagues or relatives.
Contests at AGS Cinemas, Promotional Activity at AGS Cinemas,
Communication Problem at AGS Cinemas, Customer Inquiry at
AGS Cinemas
One problem that has been observed about the website is that none of the contests have been
updated. There are no contests which are running currently, and yet the website displays four
contests which have already ended. This page can be removed completely, and any new contest
which is active should pop up while opening AGS main page, and a separate link should lead it
to the contest page. Patrons would be satisfied when AGS website is being regularly updated this
way.
Mr. Gautam, an AGS Villivakkam respondent who is from the media business said that ‘Proper
communication so that audience can get information about upcoming movies, attractions as soon
as possible’, and this holds true in many cases, such as the one mentioned above. Its also been
observed that many of the posters at AGS Villivakkam are not being regularly updated, and a
number of posters and banners displayed are of movies that have already left the theatres, or are
not to be shown. Also, there is no proper strategy as to how the posters have to be displayed, as
most seem to be put up in a random order. Ghanchakkar, a Bollywood film that was playing in
screens was placed right at the back, while posters of movies like ‘Saint Dracula 3D’ and ‘The
Collector’, movies that haven’t hit the screens and won’t, are prominently displayed. When Mr.
Dinesh was asked whether the film ‘Hitchcock’ was to play (a huge banner for the film was
displayed directly in the front), he cluelessly replied “I really don’t know”. The poster was
removed a few days later.
Also, in case of movies that are only playing in one AGS branch, if a poster is displayed in the
other branch, AGS could mention that the movie is being played currently at the other branch.
This form of promotion would make it easier for patrons to know where AGS is playing the
movies.
Lastly, many patrons have complained that the telephone inquiry service at AGS is not good.
While most of the respondents (109 out of 150) did not use the telephone inquiry service (some
did not know that AGS provided this service) and hence skipped the question, a few who
answered had complaints such as:
Shivapriya, Navallur (occasional patron): No response when used customer inquiry service.
(English film)
Joshua (regular patron): Customer service inquiry has to be looked into. (English film)
Maitri (occasional patron): Customer telephone inquiry could not be reached. (English Film)
Shiva (occasional patron): Not aware of customer inquiry.
Deepak (regular patron Customer inquiry line busy most of the time. Site should be more
attractive. (English Film)
Geeta Vishwanathan (regular patron): No response from telephone inquiry. (English film)
Sheimour (occasional patron): When information wanted, phone gets disconnected. Indifference
by customer service - very disappointed. (Telugu movie)
5 of these seven used the counter to book tickets that day, so they must’ve seen the show timings
in the newspaper (as AGS website and Book My Show mentions whether tickets are available or
not). Also, most were going for English films (5 for English, one Telugu and one unknown) and
shows for these films are usually kept minimum. 5 of these patrons were AGS Navallur
respondents, where English films are generally played more due to the favourable type of
audience.
The separate customer inquiry department which was previously kept for dealing with telephone
inquiry by AGS patrons was discontinued due to staff shortage. The telephone inquiry calls
regarding show timings etc is currently handled by the receptionist at AGS Villivakkam.
:
All screens at AGS Cinemas (at BO counter as well as concessions counter) display the same
information. One of these screens could be used to display promos of current films and
upcoming films at AGS. At concessions, an attractive visual aid should be displayed on one of
the screens.
Recommendations
1) Online Ticket Availability At AGS Villivakkam Booking Process
Comparing the booking schedule of AGS Villivakkam and its closest competitors location-wise,
Fame Cinemas, S2 Multiplex Perambur and PVR Cinemas, it is seen that only S2 Multiplex,
Perambur has its booking schedule for upcoming shows available for the whole week (Friday to
Next Thursday). It has two separate weekly schedules: one schedule (with more shows) for
Saturday and Sunday and another schedule for Friday and the coming weekdays (with less
shows).
Fame multiplex has a similar approach, keeping lesser shows on Friday and more on Saturday
and Sunday but does not show schedule for the weekdays beforehand. Only PVR and AGS
Cinemas have the same schedule for Friday, Saturday and Sunday and a different one for
Monday. However PVR reveals its schedule for Monday too while AGS doesn’t until the
weekend. Should AGS Cinemas change the way it plans its schedule by either:
a) Keeping more shows on Saturday and Sunday for the movies having lower shows on
Friday, considering that the audience on Friday is relatively low (as confirmed by theatre
owner).
b) Also planning beforehand the show timing for Monday, considering that the first four
days yields the maximum response. PVR already has a couple of shows completely
booked on Monday. (Maybe keep the same schedule for Friday and Monday)
2) Parking at AGS Villivakkam
a) Parking Availability Update
b) Online Parking Reservation
1 – Problems: A machine shows how many vacant spots remain for each screen parking
space (For example, if 2 spots of space allocated to screen 1 taken out of 25, 23 shall flash on
screen. How shall this number work automatically? How shall it register cars that enter and
exit the parking space?
1 – Alternative: While booking tickets, staff at BO can update about parking availability for
that particular screen. How shall the staff be updated about availability?
– Problems: Person selects the parking spot he wishes online (Screen 1 has 20 spots, he
selects 1 for timing 9:00 am to 12:00pm movie. Another patron selects for next show from
1:15pm to 3:45 pm. Person arrives at 8:45 am –what should he do? What happens if person
does not remove his car by 1:15pm?
2 – Parking reservation is possible, however AGS Villivakkam does not have additional
attractions at theatre and patrons generally visit the theatre only to watch the films, so a
heavy expense on parking isn’t worth the trouble.
However, since patrons do not have options in AGS Villivakkam as the multiplex only contains
theatres and a restaurant, plus there aren’t any major attractions in the surrounding areas, chances
are they exit directly after watching a film. Therefore, it shall be better to do away with the
lengthy procedure of booking tickets first, then parking and simply follow a fixed rate for a
minimum time-period ‘2-1/2 hours’ and charge Rs.10 for every additional hour. Also, instead of
raising parking ticket prices to counter price rise, it shall be wiser to increase prices where
demand is high and remains inelastic in terms of price change. Pop-corn and cold-drink, priced
reasonably in Villivakkam and a favorite among most theatre-goers as per survey analysis, can
be subjected to price change as demand may not be highly affected and patrons shall not find any
grievance with AGS Cinemas.
AGS Villivakkam currently has three BO counters which could be increased to four as the
proportion of patrons booking tickets at BO counter is greater. Alternatively, arrangements could
be made to facilitate patrons’ decision-making process by giving proper updates regarding
availability of tickets on timing schedule screens at BO (currently shows movie timings without
updating on availability status). This is especially necessary for patrons parking vehicle in AGS
parking zone as it’s required for them to obtain their tickets before proceeding to park their
vehicles. With nearly 70% respondents (32 using 2 wheeler, 25 using 4 wheeler) using private
transport at AGS Villivakkam, it is necessary to handle the queuing chain more effectively at
AGS Villivakkam.
There could also be arrangements made at AGS Villivakkam to encourage patrons of lower age-
groups to book tickets online, as it may reduce the queuing problem at AGS Villivakkam. Also,
people booking tickets online should be allowed to park vehicle on basis of online confirmation
acknowledgement form
3) New Attractions
A new attraction could be added as these people wait outside the BO counter. The paid form of
attraction or facility could be a way to earn revenue at AGS cinemas while providing the
audience another form of entertainment. This could be added at both AGS Villivakkam and AGS
Navallur, and may be different depending on the theatre. For example, taking a look at the ‘Age
group’ that comes to these theatres, especially to AGS OMR, an attraction like a ‘photo booth’
can be added for waiting patrons. As it is a trend to upload photos on Facebook, AGS could try
to include its logo inside the picture taken (maybe in the background) and try using this as a way
of promotion. A photo booth can be installed without the need for having any staff. In case of
Villivakkam, either the photo-booth could be installed either inside the box office lobby
(installing it outside may lead to theft unless it is possible to securely lock the photo booth after
the theatre closes) or in the theatre lobby near the concessions zone (the theatre patrons should be
allowed inside a little earlier in this case). This idea could also be implemented at AGS Navallur,
where the 19-25 demography is high.
An idea possible at Villivakkam (where many of the patrons come from lower-income or middle-
income groups) would be to install cut-outs of popular actors and actresses and let people take
photos standing with them (again, AGS logo should be noticeable in the picture) for free. Cut-
outs are relatively cheaper and disposable, movable, can help in promotion of theatre (if the AGS
logo is visible) and can be an added attraction (most of the demographic includes men, either
coming with partner/spouse or in large groups and would hence prefer clicking photos on
everyone grouped together instead of a photo-booth, where the no. of people allowed would be
limited).
4) 46 and Above Demographic
There have been complaints, especially from the older age group respondents at Villivakkam,
that they are compelled to sit on the floor before they can be allowed inside the theatre. It would
be recommended to have simple seating arrangement of immovable seats inside the BO area to
cater to the comfort of these people. It has been observed that the 46 and above respondents (1
female and 3 male respondents at Navallur, and 1 female and 4 male respondents at Villivakkam)
(‘Direct BO Counter Booking’ (75% respondents at Navallur, and 40% at Villivakkam)) were
more concerned about maintenance, quality, comfort and cost than the other age groups, and
many gave more elaborate suggestions than other age groups. It is necessary that attention also
be paid to this demographic.
5) Lighting Arrangement at AGS Villivakkam
One specific complaint from Geeta Vishwanath (a 46 and above AGS Navallur respondent) is
that the lighting in AGS cinemas, especially inside the theatre hall is insufficient and causes
disorientation, especially while entering the hall when the most lights have been turned off. The
row numbers have not been highlighted well either. To avoid any possibility of accidents, the
lighting arrangement at AGS Cinemas should be altered (using more yellow light instead of blue,
especially for the steps). In case of row numbers, if the expense for installing lighting to
highlight the numbers is high, an alternative arrangement can be done of placing a board outside
the screen that gives an overview of seating arrangement inside.
6) Outsourcing Ticket Booking / Telephone Inquiry
‘Outsourcing this work to cloud services will help in reducing cost while keeping this department
active. Also, along with telephone inquiry, home delivery of tickets should also start’ says Ms.
Vanaja, the CEO of Thinksoft, Chennai. AGS could limit home delivery of tickets at Navallur to
certain areas (the areas which can be reached easily, as it is a straight road which connects the
nearby areas), and if wanted, keep some conditions regarding this booking: minimum ‘x’ tickets,
commission amount ‘y’, home delivery possible ‘z’ hours before show begins.
7) 3D Glasses Quality Improvement
One respondent offers a solution. Colin, a Villivakkam patron is a budding cinematographer and
he says that the ‘3D glasses should not be tinted. The tint diminishes the brightness totally’.
Also, the process of obtaining the 3D glass should be shifted from the concessions counter to the
screen where the 3D movie is to play. One reason is that the process becomes too long and
inconvenient, especially when other screens have intervals which result in longer queues, but the
process leads to many not able to get the concessions item they want (in case the movie begins
before they’re able to buy the concessions item). A theatre employee can provide a slip after
payment is made without the need to making this process electronic (as no actual purchase is
made, and a service is temporarily used). Inox Multiplex works in this manner.
8) Theatre Seat Maintenance
A regular inspection should be done by operating personnel (for example once a fortnight) to
find out the extent of torn and damaged seats in AGS Navallur. For example if in a theatre screen
in fortnight 1, 12 seats are found to be torn, 8 are found to be damaged, and 3 are found to be
torn and damaged. In week 2, assuming no repair work has taken place, 17 sets are torn, 10 are
damaged and 5 are torn and damaged.
If a criteria is set that when x% of seats in a screen are found both torn and damaged, then
corrective measures shall be taken, then what can happen is that the screen may play
lesser shows during the time maintenance work is conducted and the movies are played
more in other screens until then. This will also send out a positive response to patrons
that AGS is paying attention to their implied/voiced concerns about seating.
b) Majority of the maintenance work can be conducted on Wednesdays and Thursdays,
when the crowd is relatively very low in most screens at AGS.
9) Menu Additions
AGS Navallur could include into its concessions items which are unavailable in the rest of the
mall and which shall be popular among the 19-25 age group, usually which can be shared by
more than one person. Popcorn and water are some of the few items that are usually shared by
more than one person. More such items can be included in the menu, both in food items and in
beverages:
a) Bread items such as chocolate croissants, doughnuts, frankies
b) Cupcakes, sponge cakes and other dry varieties of cakes (can also reduce maintenance
load for cleaning staff)
c) Ice cream cones along with cups, which may get a response from couples and young kids
d) Smoothies or slush drinks (slush drinks require less concentration and more ice, which
may make them a cheaper option and they usually take more time to be consumed, so
value for money is achieved)
e) More varieties in chocolate, which is both a favored flavor among many and an
aphrodisiac (couples)
Also to satisfy patrons who want non-vegetarian food in the theaters, paneer can be included in
some of the food items, such as puff. Balakrishna, a respondent from Navallur wants ‘more
varieties of puff’, another Navallur respondent Nazhri suggests that ‘egg puff’ be added to the
menu while Mrs. Sivakumar complaints that ‘stock of puffs gets over pretty fast’. At least 6
respondents in the survey say that puff is their favorite food item after popcorn. So, puffs and
other items where the stuffing can be different, should be considered for menu additions.
The alternatives available are:
a) Reduce the serving quantity of popcorn while keeping the same price (as popcorn is
comparatively less elastic to change in price than say, bottled water)
b) Introduce another serving size for popcorn which serves a lesser quantity and comes at a
mid-ranged price (e.g. Little Popcorn @ Rs 50); instead of a group of kids sharing from
one (In Rs 130, appetite of 3 kids satisfied), each buys their own popcorn (Rs 50 * 3 =
150).
Items served in cups should be considered for possible menu additions. PVR has a counter which
serves different flavors of boiled chana. Introducing a range of items served in cups in the price
range of Rs 50 – Rs 70 will be a good option (11 patrons selected boiled corn as their favorite
food item) as the serving size shall be less than popcorn, the item shall be light on the stomach
(thus may lead to further purchase at concessions. More boiled snacks would be a good
introduction as they’re like Chinese food – tasty and filling only for a short while and will
quickly be consumed).
Addition of reasonably priced Vada Paav may be a good option to satisfy this age group (and 46
and above age group) both in terms of serving quality, quantity and price as these two age groups
are more concerned about value for money and are dissatisfied when they are charged more and
get less in terms of quality and quantity (at least three complaints from these two groups that the
price was very high).
Appendix
a) Table showing distribution of AGS respondents based on the location they have come
from.
Data
AGS Visited Area of residence # of respondentsProportion of respondents
Navallur Adambakkam 1 1% Adyar 4 3% Chromepet 2 1% ECR 2 1% Egmore 1 1% Kanchana Paati 1 1% Karapakkam 4 3% Kelambakkam 2 1% Kilkattalai 1 1% Kilkattalaitalai 1 1% Kotturpuram 1 1% Kovallam 1 1% Koyambedu 1 1% Madambakkam 1 1% Medavakkam 2 1% Mylapore 1 1% Navallur 5 3% OMR 2 1% Padur 3 2% Pallavaram 1 1% Pallikaranai 3 2% Pammal 1 1% Pavararam 1 1% Perambakkam 1 1% Perungalathur 1 1% Porur 1 1% Shollinganallur 5 3% Sisuseri 1 1% Tambaram 4 3% Thalambur 1 1% Thiruporur 2 1% Thiruvanmiyur 2 1% Thoraipakkam 5 3% Thoraipakkam 1 1%
Thousand Lights 1 1% Velachery 6 4% Virugambakkam 1 1% (blank) 1 1%Navallur Total 75 50.00%Villivakkam Alwarpet 1 1% Ambattur 4 3% Anna Nagar 17 11% Avadi 2 1% Ayanavaram 2 1% Cholavaram 2 1% Chromepet 1 1% I.C.F. 1 1% Kadambathur 1 1% Kilpaukkam 2 1% Kodambakkam 1 1% Korattur 2 1% korattur 6 4% M.K.B. Nagar 1 1% Mogappair 5 3% Padur 1 1% Pattabiram 1 1% Perambur 3 2% R A Puram 1 1% Sowcarpet 1 1% T Nagar 1 1% Tambaram 1 1% Thiruvindravur 1 1% Tondiarpet 1 1% Villivakkam 14 9% Virugambakkam 1 1% (blank) 1 1%Villivakkam Total 75 50.00%Grand Total 150 100.00%
b) Tables showing respondent’s satisfaction level with picture quality at AGS Villivakkam
and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Visited Movie Experience - Picture Quality No of RespondentsVillivakkam Average 6 Good 55 Great 14Villivakkam Total 75
AGS Visited Movie Experience - Picture Quality No Of Respondents Navallur Average 10 Good 53 Great 9 Poor 1 (blank) 2Navallur Total 75
c) Tables showing respondent’s satisfaction level with sound quality at AGS Villivakkam
and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Visited Movie Experience - Sound QualityNo of
Respondents Villivakkam Average 18 Good 44 Great 13Villivakkam Total 75
AGS Visited Movie Experience - Sound Quality No of respondentsNavallur Average 13 Good 50 Great 10 (blank) 2Navallur Total 75
d) Tables showing respondents’ satisfaction level with seating facility at AGS Villivakkam
and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Visited Seat Comfort No of RespondentsVillivakkam Very Poor 1 Poor 2 Average 12 Good 48 Great 12Villivakkam Total 75
AGS Visited Movie Experience - Seat Comfort # of respondentsNavallur Very Poor 3 Poor 7 Average 29 Good 29 Great 5 (blank) 2Navallur Total 75
e) Tables showing respondents’ satisfaction level with air conditioning facility at AGS
Villivakkam and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS VisitedMovie Experience - Air Conditioning No of respondents
Villivakkam Average 7 Good 53 Great 15Villivakkam Total 75
AGS Visited Movie Experience - Air Conditioning No of respondentsNavallur Good Average 13 Good 56 Great 4 Poor 1 (blank) 1Navallur Total 75
f) Tables showing respondents’ satisfaction level with lobby ambience at AGS Villivakkam
and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS VisitedMovie Experience - Lobby Ambience No of Respondents
Villivakkam Average 13 Good 51 Great 7 Poor 2 (blank) 2Villivakkam Total 75
AGS VisitedMovie Experience - Lobby Ambience # of respondents
Navallur Average 8 Good 55 Great 9 (blank) 3Navallur Total 75
g) Tables showing respondents’ satisfaction level with menu variety at AGS Villivakkam
and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Visited Concessions - Menu Variety No of respondentsVillivakkam Average 38 High 21 Low 7 (blank) 9Villivakkam Total 75
AGS Visited Concessions : Menu Variety No of respondentsNavallur Average 36 High 18 Low 13 (blank) 8Navallur Total 75
h) Tables showing respondents’ satisfaction level with concessions serving quantity at AGS
Villivakkam and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Visited Concessions: Serving Quantity No of respondentsVillivakkam High 31 Average 31 Low 2 (blank) 11Villivakkam Total 75
AGS Visited Concessions: Serving Quantity Number of respondentsNavallur Average 29 High 34 Low 3 (blank) 9Navallur Total 75
i) Tables showing respondents’ satisfaction level with refreshment quality at AGS
Villivakkam and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Visited Concessions: Refreshment Quality No of respondentsVillivakkam Low 4 Average 30 High 33 (blank) 8Villivakkam Total 75
.
AGS Visited Concessions: Refreshment Quality No of respondentsNavallur Low 4 Average 29 High 33 (blank) 9Navallur Total 75
j) Tables showing respondents’ satisfaction level with concessions’ staff helpfulness at
AGS Villivakkam and AGS Navallur respectively
AGS Visited Concessions: Staff Helpfulness No of respondentsVillivakkam Low 2 Average 21 High 41 (blank) 11Villivakkam Total 75
AGS Visited Concessions: Staff Helpfulness No of respondentsNavallur Low 1 Average 23 High 42 (blank) 9 Average Navallur Total 75