anatoly yanovsky deputy minister of energy of the russian federation brussels, march 2012
TRANSCRIPT
ANATOLY YANOVSKYDEPUTY MINISTER OF ENERGY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Brussels, March 2012
1994 – Signing of the Agreement on Russia-EU Partnership and Cooperation and its entry into force in 1997 (for the initial period of 10 years and to be prolonged by default)
2000 – The decision of Russia-EU summit on creating of Russia-EU Energy Dialogue2001 – Creation of Thematic groups of Russia-EU Energy Dialogue2001 – Approval of the Nord Stream projects, Shtockman field development, and the system of
Yamal-Europe gas pipeline within the scope of Russia-EU Energy Dialogue at the Russia-EU summit.
2001 – Identification of the projects of Nord Stream, Shtockman field, Yamal-Europe as the “common interest” projects and support of the construction project for Burgas-Alexandroupolis oil pipeline (First joint Synthesis Report on Russia-EU-Energy Dialogue, 2001)
2005 – Adoption of the Road Map for the Russia-EU Common Economic Space2005 – First Meeting of the Energy Permanent Partnership Council (PPC) at the ministerial level2007 – Assigning the TEN-E status to the Nord Stream project, beginning of construction of the first
line in 2009, completion in 20112009 – Decision on the beginning of discussions on the New Framework Agreement2009 – Signing of the Memorandum on the Early Warning Mechanism2010 – Anniversary Conference “Russia-EU Energy Dialogue”2010 – Adoption of a Joint Statement on initiative “Partnership for Modernization”2011 – Meeting of the Government of the Russian Federation with European Commission, signing of
the Memorandum on the Early Warning Mechanism and Overcoming Emergency Situations in the Energy Sector, the Joint Statement on Information Exchange, the Joint Statement on Creating a Mechanism to assess future Trends in the Gas Markets, Common Understanding on the Preparation of the Road Map of the EU- Russia Energy Cooperation until 2050.
Chronology of EU-Russia Cooperation and the Energy Dialogue
2
Evolution of EU Energy Policy
1994 – Signing of the Corfu Declaration – distribution of market shares (quotes) between internal and external suppliers of uranium products
1998 – Adoption of Directive 1998/30/ЕС concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas
2003 – Adoption of Directives 2003/54/ЕС , 2003/55/ЕС concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and electricity market (second energy package)
2005 – signing of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community
2009 – Adoption of Directives 2009/72/ЕС , 2009/73/ЕС concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and electricity (third energy package)
2009 – Official startup of the Eastern Partnership initiative in the development of the European Neighborhood Policy (Ukraine , Moldova, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia and Belarus)
2010 – Communication 'Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond’
2010 – Adoption of EU Energy Strategy until 2020 (20/20/20)
2011– Creation of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators
2011– Adoption of the Road map for EU development until 2050 3
Evolution of Russian Energy Policy
1993-1997 – Privatization of oil industry
1993-1997 – Privatization of coal industry
1994 – Signing the Energy Charter Treaty (termination 2009)
1995 – Law on PSA (amendments 1999-2011)
2001-2011 – Russian electricity reform (incl. VICs unbundling, facilities privatization)
2003 – Energy strategy until 2020
2008 – Law On Foreign Investments In Strategic Areas (Legal framework, establishment of Government
commission and Business Consulting Council, new law amendments – 1st and 2nd packages, 2011)
2009 – Energy strategy until 2030
2010-2011 – System of strategic and program documents (General scheme of development of the gas
industry up to 2030; General scheme of electric energy objects placement until 2020 – 2030; General
scheme of development of the oil industry until 2020; Long-term program of the development of the
coal industry until 2030; State energy efficiency and energy saving program until 2020)
4
CoordinatorsS. Shmatko – Minister of Energy of the Russian
Federation
G.H. Oettinger – Commissioner for Energy
CoordinatorsS. Shmatko – Minister of Energy of the Russian
Federation
G.H. Oettinger – Commissioner for Energy
Delegated CoordinatorsA.Yanovsky - Deputy Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation
P.Lowe – Director General, DG Energy
Delegated CoordinatorsA.Yanovsky - Deputy Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation
P.Lowe – Director General, DG Energy
Thematic group on energy markets and strategies
Thematic group on energy markets and strategies
Subgroup on scenarios and
forecasts
Subgroup on scenarios and
forecasts
Thematic group on energy efficiency and innovationsThematic group on energy efficiency and innovations
Thematic group on electricity
Thematic group on electricity
Thematic group on nuclear energyThematic group
on nuclear energyGas Advisory
Council
Informal EU-Russia Consultations on Gas Issues
Partnership for modernization
Subgroup on the Roadmap of the EU-Russia Energy Cooperation until 2050
Subgroup on the Roadmap of the EU-Russia Energy Cooperation until 2050
Advisory bodies and mechanisms of partnership
Structure of the EU-Russia Energy Dialogue
5
COOPERATION:
Phases Results Mechanisms Institutions
2011-2020
2021-2030
2031-2050
FORMAT PROBLEMS
How to construct the mutual part of our energy future?
Which part of uncertainty could and should be thus diminished?
How to create the pathway to this future?
How efficient may be results of our cooperation along this pathway?
How to prevent this pathway from being destroyed by our policies?
How to combine the flexibility and definiteness of the pathway?
Aim - to make visible and facilitate the realization of the potential for long-term cooperation in energy sphere •The EU and Russian energy policies are different, but there do exist such areas where these policies converge and thereby mutually explored and mutually beneficial synergies may arise• The Roadmap should include necessary milestones and consider its practical realization issues• The adopted Roadmap should provide for some kind of generalized work plan of the EU-Russia Energy Dialog activities
EU-Russia Energy Cooperation Roadmap
6
APPROACH
European Companies’ Assets in Russia
Electric power industry• E. ON – 78.3% in OGK-4, OJSC• Enel – 56.43% in OGK-5, OJSC, including the
share of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development - 17.14%
• Fortum – 92.9% in Fortum OJSC, formerly TGK-10
• Fortum Power and Heat Oy – 25.66% in TGK-1, OJSC
• Siemens – 100% of the plant in Voronezh (production of high voltage equipment)
• Siemens – 25% in Power Machines, OJSC• Siemens – 44.88% in Interturbo, LLC
Oil and gas industry• TOTAL – 49% in Total Thermokarst BV (gas-
condensate field)• TOTAL – 20,5% in Yamal SPG, OJSC• TOTAL – 25% in Shtockman Development AG• TOTAL – 40% in Total Exploration and
Development in Russia (Kharyaga oil field)• BP – 50% in TNK-BP• SHELL – 27.5% minus 1 share in Sakhalin-2• SHELL – a joint venture with NK Evikhon (Salym
group of oil fields - in Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous District)
• SHELL – 5.5% in the Caspian Pipeline Consortium• MOL – 50% in Zapadno-Malobalykskoye, LLC
100% in BayTex LLC, Matjushkinskaya vertical LLC, MOL - Western Siberia LLC
• BASF – 25% in Severneftegazprom, OJSC (South-Russian oil and gas field)
• E. ON AG – 25% in Severneftegazprom, OJSC (South-Russian oil and gas field)
7
Risks associated with the implementation of the EU’s Third Energy Package provisions
8
Joint Projects of Russian and European Companies in Gas Sector:NORD STREAM
9
Joint Projects of Russian and European Companies in Gas Sector:SOUTH STREAM
10
Possible measures for the establishment of joint system to ensure secure gas supply
• Collaborative design of the unified system of reliable gas supply to Europe
• Lifting restrictions and obstacles to the development of gas storage facilities in the EU
by gas suppliers
• Prompt cooperation between the parties as early as the nearest winterization season, with gradual accumulation of experience and, simultaneously, raising public awareness on the importance of the planned activities
• Application in the EU of experience gained by Gazprom’s dispatch and control centers and making arrangements for their cooperation with the existing EU structures and structures being created
11
Russia & EU Power Systems Synchronous Operation
BRELL: Augstsprieguma Tikls (Latvia)Elering (Estonia)Litgrid (Lithuania)SO UPS, JSC (Russia)FGC UES, JSC (Russia)Belenergo (Belarus)
BRELL mechanisms deficiency:•electric modes planning (transfer capacity, reserves)•electric modes control (congestion management) •lack of the economical mechanisms of market procedures & interaction coordination•lack of responsibilities and obligations of the parties to maintain operational characteristics•coordination of the network development plans
Power flows in BRELL synchronous zone:
12
Problem solutions
Fundamental approaches of the Russian side
Implementation mechanisms Expected results
• Compliance by the parties with the previously
signed bilateral international agreements and
acknowledgement of their supremacy over
national legislation.
• Defining the status of “cross-border projects”
to supply gas/oil and electricity to the EU
Member States.
• Safeguarding the existing and new export-
import energy systems
• Recognizing that long-term contracts are the
key mechanism for natural gas supplies
• Preventing unilateral changes to the existing
conditions of joint operation of the power
systems
• Joint elaboration of uniform criteria and
principles to insure reliability and stability in
the operation of the power systems
• Availability of mandatory arbitration
mechanism to settle disputes between different
parties and between a party and investors on
the other side
• Agreement between the
Russian Federation and the
European Union on cooperation
in the implementation of
infrastructure projects for
natural gas exports from the
Russian Federation to the
European Union and joint
operation of the power systems
• Agreement between the
Russian Federation and the
European Union on joint
synchronous operation of the
United Power System of the
Russian Federation and the
power systems of the Republic
of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania
and Republic of Estonia
• Cooperation between national
regulators
• In goals and
guidelines for long-
term energy
cooperation
• In stages and
conditions for the
development and
stable operation of the
energy infrastructure
• In predictable
regulatory system
that fosters
cooperation
• In the development of
scientific and
technological
cooperation in the
energy sphere,
including technologies
and human resource
potential
13