anatomy of seed

42
Anatomy of Seed An inside look into a $1M seed round. Brendan Baker @brendanbaker

Upload: brendanbaker

Post on 17-Aug-2014

102.831 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


8 download

DESCRIPTION

An inside look at a $1M seed round. Props to Daniel Odio of Appmakr for working with me on this. Check out the full map at http://brendanbaker.co/anatomy.pdf and join the Quora fun at http://b.qr.ae/m3xRAI.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy of Seed An inside look into a $1M seed round.

Brendan  Baker  @brendanbaker  

Page 2: Anatomy of Seed

Ringleader

AngelList

Daily Schooling

Daniel  Odio  Co-­‐founder  of  Appmakr.  www.danielodio.com  

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

8000  startups  reviewed  with  AngelList,  hundreds  of  conversaCons  with  founders  about  their  fundraising,  daily  schooling  from  Nivi  and  Naval,  engineering  and  business  at  Cambridge  and  Oxford.    

e:  [email protected]        t:  @brendanbaker        w:  www.brendanbaker.co  q:  www.quora.com/Brendan-­‐Baker  

Official Support

Marc  Ventresca,  Oxford  Economic  sociologist,  expert  in  new  market  formaCon:  hLp://bit.ly/htkT3l  

Collaborator Support

Appmakr  lets  anyone  launch  their  own  iPhone  app  with  no  coding.  Over  5,000  apps  have  been  built,  with  55M  total  user  sessions.  

Page 3: Anatomy of Seed

We wanted to see what a fundraising process looks like for a startup and get an inside look at

how the industry is changing.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Page 4: Anatomy of Seed

Thoughts for startups and investors.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

So  we  analyzed  500+  emails  from  Appmakr’s  first  raise  to  map  the  path  they  took  through  investor  networks  to  

raise  $1M.  

The result? !

Page 5: Anatomy of Seed

We tracked all kinds of stuff:

InsCtuConal  Actor  

Funding  

VCs  

Seed  Funds  

Angels  

RejecCon  

Intros  

The  key  actors:  

Page 6: Anatomy of Seed

This  is  what  it  a  seed  round  looks  like.  

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

See for yourself: http://brendanbaker.co/anatomy.pdf!

Page 7: Anatomy of Seed

It wasn’t easy.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

173 Actors 55 VCs 55 Angels 28 Seed Funds 27 Middlemen 5 Corporate 2 Institutions 1 Angel Group

130 Rejections 14 Commitments

Results

Page 8: Anatomy of Seed

How do they all stack up?

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Page 9: Anatomy of Seed

Angels

v Seed Funds

v VCs

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Page 10: Anatomy of Seed

Seed funds give big.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Appmakr raised an average of $6.9K per potential investor, but not all were equal*:

12.3K

6.4K 5.5K

*  Ridiculously  small  sample  size.  Will  this  hold  with  more  cases?  

Angels   VCs  Seed  Funds  0

5

10

15

Dol

lars

per

con

tact

(‘00

0 U

SD

)

Page 11: Anatomy of Seed

But seed funds also took forever to decide.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

VCs and angels were quicker to respond.

Angels

0 10 Response Time (days)

20 30

22.4 days

VCs 20.4 days

Seed Funds 29.8 days

Page 12: Anatomy of Seed

Old Style

v New Style

v Time Wasters

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Page 13: Anatomy of Seed

There were three clear paths in the data:

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Old  Style   New  Style   Time  Wasters  

Page 14: Anatomy of Seed

( )

The process was driven by an

influential first actor, whose weight

carried to help Appmakr get

downstream intros and investments.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Old Style

It propagated through interpersonal networks, and was driven by dynamics within these networks.

Page 15: Anatomy of Seed

How the Old Stylers invested

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Started with a supernode, in this case a well-connected angel.

There were more commitments from downstream intros. 1

Several commitments emerged from the first intros.

2

3

Page 16: Anatomy of Seed

( )

The process was facilitated by a

credible market intermediary.

Investors made decisions efficiently,

without making new intros.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

New Style

It played out more like an efficient market, where investors evaluated the good (i.e. startup) and bought or not.

Page 17: Anatomy of Seed

How the New Stylers invested

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Started with an ecosystem intermediary. In this case it’s AngelList.

1 Investors efficiently declined or committed. 2

There were few downstream intros and no downstream commitments.

3

Page 18: Anatomy of Seed

( )

These intros just wasted Daniel’s time and energy. None of them

amounted to anything.

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Time Wasters

The trick is to identify the time wasters early. More on that later.

Page 19: Anatomy of Seed

How the Time Wasters invested (or didn’t)

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

There are many new introductions, but at most 3 at a time.

1 None of them led anywhere 2

There’s one late commitment, but Daniel already knew him.

3

Page 20: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

What if you can’t tell the Time Wasters

from the Old Style?

Should you use tools to try the new style?

Q

Page 21: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

13.8K

Old  Style    (incl  Time  Wasters)  

New  Style  0

5

10

Dol

lars

per

con

tact

(‘00

0 U

SD

)

Try the New Style (i.e. use tools). Appmakr found AngelList to be 3X more efficient than non-AngelList.

A

10.4K

3.4K

i.e. New Style v [Old Style + Time Wasters]

Page 22: Anatomy of Seed

Thoughts for Startups and Investors

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

( ) From the analysis and Daniel’s experience.

Page 23: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Fundraising takes longer than you think.

Be ready for the grind.

1

Page 24: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

There are periods of low investor activity.

Avoid late summer and winter holidays.

2

Page 25: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

A large amount of your funds may come from

a few people. These are your super nodes.

Find them and support them.

3

Page 26: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

(however,)

A large number of intros will lead nowhere

and will waste your time.

Don’t invest much in these interactions.

4

( ) Daniel’s Rule of 10: ‘If I don’t get >10 intros from someone, I’m

not going to invest a lot of time.’ Use at your own peril!

Page 27: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

(Let’s take a quick pause…)

They’re willing and able to make a bunch of intros.

2 1

3

How do you tell a super node from a time waster? Or a productive investor from an unproductive one?

Their eyes light up and they excitedly push a crumpled check into your hands

You have a pre-existing relationship with them

4 You see them in person. (In-person meetings averaged $11.5K, phone $3K and email less than $2K.)

Page 28: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

It’s probably not about identifying them

immediately, so much as amplifying support for

your super nodes and reducing the time and

energy drain from your time wasters.

(OK, back to the list…)

Page 29: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

With investors, there are leaders and followers.

You’ll have higher conversion after getting a

committed investor or two.

5

Page 30: Anatomy of Seed

( )

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

There are tools that can help.

Use them when it makes sense.

6

AngelList, Techcrunch Disrupt, Venture Hacks, Founders’ Institute, Y Combinator, Launch.is, University competitions, Angel Groups General Assembly, AngelPad,

Bootup, i/o Ventures, Hackers and Founders, NYCSeed, Founder’s Den, Seedcamp, General Assembly, Founder’s Roundtable, VC open house days, 160 Vark, Sunfire,

Meetup groups, AVC.com, TheFunded.com, 500 Startups, Bothsidesofthetable.com, LinkedIn groups, chrisdixon.org, Techstars, steveblank.com and many more.

Page 31: Anatomy of Seed

Startups

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

7Information is becoming more public

Startups can now build more with less

Get used to being open about your

traction and raise details.

Page 32: Anatomy of Seed

Investors

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

The market for early stage capital is

becoming more efficient. How does that

affect your own approach?

1

Page 33: Anatomy of Seed

Investors

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Proprietary dealflow quantity and quality

will decline as a driver of returns.

2

Page 34: Anatomy of Seed

Investors

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Market intermediaries (i.e. new startup tools)

are gaining importance. More will come.

How can you exploit these?

(e.g. Start Fund)

3

Page 35: Anatomy of Seed

( )

Investors

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Advisory will become more important

than connective.

4

Old school: “we can make introductions for you.”

New school: “we can help you understand how to scale to 3M users on X platform.”

Page 36: Anatomy of Seed

Investors

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Reputation is gold.

It will continue to gain importance in the near

term as information becomes more public.

5

Page 37: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Startups: for building kickass companies. Investors: for helping them get there.

Daniel Odio: for access to his email and story. Marc Ventresca: for guidance and a deep understanding of market

formation. @mingyeow, @naval, @michaelaiello, @cjwake for feedback on ideas

and first drafts.

Thanks

*

Page 38: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

*

Page 39: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

This is only one data point.

The next 10 startups we map will confirm or

refute the first findings.

* 1

Page 40: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Is post-hoc email tracking accurate enough?

I think so. Even if the meeting is by phone or in

person, there is rarely a meeting that isn’t set

up or followed up by email these days.

* 2

Page 41: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

Definitions are imperfect.

So is the mapping. Judgments had to be made

about what is VC v seed fund, what were

really intros, engagement start and end, etc.

* 3

Page 42: Anatomy of Seed

Anatomy  of  Seed            Brendan  Baker  

What about existing networks?

It would be fascinating to overlay this onto a

map of existing relationships (ex: ‘investor X

made 5 of 30 potential intros’). If anyone

wants to do this, get in touch.

* 4