42C12NWe87l 2.6590 MOLSON LAKE010

42C12NW0071 2.6590 MOLSON LAKE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part A; Notes on theory and field procedure

Part B; Report

1. Introduction

2. Presentation of Results

3. Discussion of Results

4. Recommendations

5. Assessment Details

6. Statement of Cost

7. Certificate - P.G. Hallof

8. Appendix - Shallow Sources

8 pages

7 pages Page

l

1

2

3

5

6

7

010C

Part C; Illustrations

Plan Map (in pocket)

IP Data Plots

6 pieces

Dwg.No.I.P.P. 4115R

Dwg.Nos.IP 5370-1 to -5

o e

42C12NWee?t 2 .6598 MOLSON LAKE010

42C12NW0071 2 .6590 MOLSON LAKE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part A; Notes on theory and field procedure

Part B; Report

1. Introduction

2. Presentation of Results

3. Discussion of Results

4. Recommendations

5. Assessment Details

6. Statement of Cost

7. Certificate - P.G. Hallof

8. Appendix - Shallow Sources

8 pages

7 pages Page

l

1

2

3

5

6

7

010C

Part C; Illustrations

Plan Map (in pocket)

IP Data Plots

6 pieces

Dwg.No.I.P.P. 4115R

Dwg.Nos.IP 5370-1 to -5

O 6 1984

MHOS Sffinos

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED

NOTES ON THE THEORY, METHOD OF FIELD OPERATION,

AND PRESENTATION OF DATA

FOR THE INDUCED POLARIZATION METHOD

Induced Polarization as a geophysical measurement refers

to the blocking action or polarization of metallic or electronic

conductors in a medium of ionic solution conduction.

This electro-chemical phenomenon occurs wherever

electrical current is passed through an area which contains metallic

minerals such as base metal sulphides. Normally, when current is

passed through the ground, as in resistivity measurements, all of the

conduction takes place through ions present in the water content of the

rock, or soil, i.e. by ionic conduction. This is because almost all

minerals have a much higher specific resistivity than ground water,

The group of minerals commonly described as "metallic", however,

have specific resistivities much lower than ground waters. The

induced polarization effect takes place at those interfaces where the

mode of conduction changes from ionic in the solutions filling the

interstices of the rock to-electronic; in the,metallic minerals present

- 2 -

in the rock.

The blocking action or induced polarization mentioned

above, which depends upon the chemical energies necessary to allow

the ions to give up or receive electrons from the metallic surface,

increases with the time that a d.c. current is allowed to flow through

the rock; i.e. as ions pile up against the metallic interface the

resistance to current flow increases. Eventually, there is enough

polarization in the form of excess ions at the interfaces, to appreciably

reduce the amount of current flow through the metallic particle. This

polarization takes place at each of the infinite number of solution-metal

interfaces in a mineralized rock.

When the d.c. voltage used to create this d.c. current

flow is cut off, the Coulomb forces between the charged ions forming

the polarization cause them to return to their normal position. This

movement of charge creates a small current flow which can be

measured on the surface of the ground as a decaying potential difference.

From an alternate viewpoint it can be seen that if the

direction of the current through the system is reversed repeatedly

before the polarization occurs, the effective resistivity of the system

as a whole will change as the frequency of the switching is changed.

This is a consequence of the fact that the amount of current flowing

through each metallic interface depends upon the length of time that

current has been passing through it in one direction.

- 3 -

The values of the per cent frequency effect or F.E. are

a measurement of the polarization in the rock mass. However, since

the measurement of the degree of polarization is related to the apparent

resistivity of the rock mass it is found that the metal factor values or

M.F. are the most useful values in determining the amount of

polarization present in the rock mass. The MF values are obtained by

normalizing the F.E. values for varying resistivities.

The induced polarization measurement is perhaps the most

powerful geophysical method for the direct detection of metallic

sulphide mineralization, even when this mineralization is of very

low concentration. The lower limit of volume per cent sulphide

necessary to produce a recognizable IP anomaly will vary with the

geometry and geologic environment of the source, and the method of

executing the survey. However, sulphide mineralization of less than

one per cent by volume has been detected by the IP method under

proper geological conditions.

The greatest application of the IP method has been in the

search for disseminated metallic sulphides of less than 2 07, by volume.

However, it has also been used successfully in the search for massive

sulphides in situations where, due to source geometry, depth of source,f

or low resistivity of surface layer, the EM method cannot be successfully

applied. The ability to differentiate ionic conductors, such as water

filled shear zones, makes the IP method a useful tool in checking EM

anomalies which are suspected of being due to these causes.

In normal field applications the IP method does not

differentiate between the economically important metallic minerals

such as chalcopyrite, chalcocite, molybdenite, galena, etc., and the

other metallic minerals such as pyrite. The induced polarization effect

is due to the total of all electronic conducting minerals in the rock mass.

Other electronic conducting materials which can produce an IP response

are magnetite, pyrolusite, graphite, and some forms of hematite.

In the field procedure, measurements on the surface are

made in a way that allows the effects of lateral changes in the properties

of the ground to be separated from the effects of vertical changes in the

properties. Current is applied to the ground at two points in distance

(X) apart. The potentials are measured at two points (X) feet

apart, in line with the current electrodes is an integer number (n) times

the basic distance (X).

The measurements are made along a surveyed line, with

a constant distance (nX) between the nearest current and potential

electrodes. In most surveys, several traverses are made with various

values of (n); i.e. (n) - 1 ,2,3,4, etc. The kind of survey required

(detailed or reconnaissance) decides the number of values of (n) used.

In plotting the results, the values of apparent resistivity,

apparent per cent frequency effect, and the apparent metal factor

- 5 -

measured for each set of electrode positions are plotted at the

intersection of grid lines, one from the center point of the current

electrodes and the other from the center point of the potential electrodes.

(See Figure A). The resistivity values are plotted at the top of the data

profile, above the percent frequency effect. On a third line, below the

percent frequency effect, are plotted the values of the metal factor values.

The lateral displacement of a given value is determined by the location

along the survey line of the center point between the current and potential

electrodes. The distance of the value from the line is determined by the

distance (nX) between the current and potential electrodes when the

measurement was made.

The separation between sender and receiver electrodes is

only one factor which determines the depth to which the ground is being

sampled in any particular measurement. The plots then, when contoured,

are not section maps of the electrical properties of the ground under

the survey line. The interpretation of the results from any given survey

must be carried out using the combined experience gained from field

results, model study results and the theoretical investigations. The

position of the electrodes when anomalous values are measured is

important in the interpretation.

In the field procedure, the interval over which the potential

differences are measured is the same as the interval over which the

electrodes are moved after a series of potential readings has been made.

-6 -

One of the advantages of the induced polarization method is that the

same equipment can be used for both detailed and reconnaissance surveys

merely by changing the distance (X) over which the electrodes are moved

each time. In the past, intervals have been used ranging from 25 feet

to 2000 feet for (X). In each case, the decision as to the distance (X)

and the values of (n) to be used is largely determined by the expected

size of the mineral deposit being sought, the size of the expected anomaly

and the speed with which it is desired to progress.

The diagram in Figure A demonstrates the method used

in plotting the results. Each value of the apparent resistivity, apparent

percent frequency effect, and apparent metal factor effect is plotted and

identified by the position of the four electrodes when the measurement

was made. It can be seen that the values measured for the larger values

of (n) are plotted farther from the line indicating that the thickness of

the layer of the earth that is being tested is greater than for the smaller

values of (n); i.e. the depth of the measurement is increased.

The IP measurement is basically obtained by measuring the

difference in potential or voltage (AV)obtained at two operating

frequencies. The voltage is the product of the current through the ground

and the apparent resistivity of the ground. Therefore in field situations

where the current is very low due to poor electrode contact, or the

apparent resistivity is very low, or a combination of the two effects; the

value of (AV ) the change in potential will be too small to be measurable.

The symbol "TL" on the data plots indicates this situation.

- 7 ~

In some situations spurious noise, either man made or natural,

will render it impossible to obtain a reading. The symbol "N" on the

data plots indicates a station at which it is too noisy to record a reading.

If a reading can be obtained, but for reasons of noise there is some doubt

as to its accuracy, the reading is bracketed in the data plot ( ).

In certain situations negative values of Apparent Frequency

Effect are recorded. This may be due to the geologic environment or

spurious electrical effects. The actual negative frequency effect value

recorded is indicated on the data plot, however, the symbol "NEC" is

indicated for the corresponding value of Apparent Metal Factor. In

contouring negative values the contour lines are indicated to the nearest

positive value in the immediate vicinity of the negative value.

The symbol "NR" indicates that for some reason the operator

did not attempt to record a reading although normal survey procedures

would suggest that one was required. This may be due to inaccessible

topography or other similar reasons. Any symbol other than those

discussed above is unique to a particular situation and is described within

the body of the report.

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED.

f METHOD USED IN PLOTTING DIPOLE-DIPOLE

INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS

nx

Stations on line

rt - l

n - 2

rt - 3

n - 4

x * Electrode spreod length n * Electrode seporotlon

P p p p p p1,2-5.4 2,3-4,5 3.4-5,6 4,5-6? 5,6-7,8 6,7-8,9

P P P P P'l,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9

P P P P1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3.4-7,8 4,5-8,9

P P P 1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9

Apparent Resistivity

n - J

n - 2

n - 3

n - 4

F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E1,2-3,4 2,3- 4 fi 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5.6-7J8 6,7-8,9

F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E.. .. .. .. .1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9

i,2 : 5,6 2^-6,7 3,4-7,'e 4^-e',9 Apparent Percent P E p E F.E Frequency Effect

1,2-617 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9

n - l

n - 2

n - 3

n - 4

M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F, M.F. M.F. 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5,6-7,8 6,7-8,9

___ M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9

______ M.F. M.F. - M.F. M.F. 1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3,4-7,8 4^-8,9

_________ M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9

Apparent Metal Factor

Fig. A

SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT

ON THE

DETAILED INDUCED POLARIZATION

AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY

ON THE

B. BOOS CLAIM GROUP.

HEMLO AREA, ONTARIO

FOR

SEEMAR MINES LIMITED

1. INTRODUCTION

A previous report, dated November 14, 1983, describes the

reconnaissance results from the B. Boos Claim Group. These measurements

were made using 200 foot electrode intervals.

Induced Polarization anomalies were indicated by these

reconnaissance data, but some distortions were suspected due to the

presence of a grounded power line. Detailed measurements have now been

completed on the southwest portion of the grid, using X e 100'.

2. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

The reconnaissance induced polarization and resistivity results are

shown on the following enclosed data plots. The results have been

plotted using the "pseudo-section" format.

- 2 -

Line Electrode Intervals Dwg. No.

O 100' IP 5370-1

2E 100' IP 5370-2

4E 100' IP 5370-3

6E 100' IP 5370-4

8E 100' IP 5370-5

The plan map from the previous report, Dwg.No, I.P.P. 4115, has

been updated to show the results of the detailed survey.

3. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The detailed measurements with one hundred foot electrode intervals

have confirmed that a strong IP anomaly lies to the south of the power

line.

The apparent resistivity results, and the IP anomalies have been

transferred to the plan map, Dwg.No. I.P.P.4115R. There are still some

possible distortions due to the power line. However, the patterns

suggest that the broad anomalous zone measured on Line O may be due to

the fact that the survey line passes approximately parallel to the nose

of a fold.

To the south, and southeast, the IP anomaly correlates with a zone

of lower apparent resistivities. To the north, and northeast, the zone

of lower apparent resistivities passes beneath the conductive overburden

layer. Under these conditions, the exact interpretation of the zone of

lower apparent resistivities is not possible.

To the southeast, the IP results indicate a narrow, shallow source.

To the northeast, there is the possibility that a portion of the complex

anomalous pattern is due to the grounded power line.

- 3 -

The available geologic information indicates that to the southeast

the narrow anomalous zone lies near a contact vith felsic rocks to the

south and sediments and volcanics to the north. Some pyrite, pyrrhotite

and rusty outcrops have been mapped in this area.

As outlined in the Appendix to this report, the sources of these

narrow, shallow anomalies can be better located and more fully evaluated

by making detailed measurements using shorter electrode intervals.

4. RECOMMENDATIONS

The detailed measurements on the B. Boos Claim Group have been made

in the southwest corner of the grid. Some distortions from the grounded

power line may be present. However, a definite anomalous zone has been

confirmed to the southeast. As shown on the plan map. Dwg.No.

I.P.P.4115R, it is possible that Line O crosses the nose of a fold; this

geometry would explain the broad IP anomaly measured on Line 0.

To the southeast, the narrow, shallow IP anomaly, associated with a

zone of low resistivities, appears to correlate closely with a geologic

contact. The position of this anomalous zone should be correlated

carefully with the available geological and geochemical information. If

the source of the strong IP effects is not known, a drill test would be

warranted.

At the least two, or perhaps more, short angled drill holes would

be necessary to test the anomalous zone. As outlined in the Appendix to

this report, the source of the narrow, shallow anomalies can be better

located, and more fully evaluated by making detailed measurements using

shorter electrode intervals. Measurements should be made

using X s 50 feet and perhaps even X ^ 30 feet.

- A -

The anomalies recommended for further investigation are:

i) Line O, 4+50S

ii) Line 2E, 14+OOS

iii) Line 4E, 3+50S

iv) Line 6E, 17+50S

When the detail recommended above is available, drill holes can be

located to intersect the sources.

PH01

Philip G. g#lof, Ph.D., Geophysicist

Dated: March 15, 1984

- 5 -

ASSESSMENT DETAILS

PROPERTY: B.Boos Claims

SPONSOR: Seemar Mines Ltd.

LOCATION: Hemlo Area

TYPE OF SURVEY: Induced Polarizationand Resistivity

OPERATING MAN DAYS:

EQUIVALENT 8 HR. MAN DAYS:

CONSULTING MAN DAYS:

DRAFTING MAN DAYS:

TOTAL MAN DAYS:

15.0

22.5

2.25

3.25

28.0

PROVINCE: Ontario

DATE STARTED: February 9, 1984

DATE FINISHED: February 17, 1984

NUMBER OF STATIONS: 125

NUMBER OF READINGS: 1,455

MILES OF LINE SURVEYED: 2.27

CONSULTANTS:

P.G. Hallof, 3505 - 2045 Lakeshore Blvd. W., Toronto, Ontario

FIELD TECHNICIANS:

R. Fernholm, c/o General Delivery, Haileybury, Ontario D. Daggett, 35 Falcon Crescent, Chelmsford, Ontario

Extra Labourers;

D. Tardif, P.O. Box 239, St. Leonard, N.B.C. Constantineau, P.O. Box 201, White River, Ontario

CARTOGRAPHERS:

R.C. Norris, 2499 Linwood Street, Pickering, Ontario M.W. Reh, 58 Crossbow Crescent, Willowdale, Ontario

SICS LIMI

Philip G. Hallof, Ph.D

Dated: March 15, 1984

- 6 -

STATEMENT OF COST

Manwa Exploration Services Ltd. - IP Survey B.Boos Grid - Hemlo Area, Ontario

CREW; D. Daggett - R. Fernholm

Extra Labourers: D. Tardif - C. Constantineau

PERIOD; February 9-17, 1984

7*5 Operating days 1*5 Bad Weather

Local Transportation: 9 days

@ $675.00/day @ $340.00/day

@ $ 55.00/day

$5,062.50 510.00

495.00

Extra Labourers:

2 men @ $70.00/day/man x 9+2QZ

$1,260.00 252.00

1,512.00 $7,579.50

Dated: March 15, 1984

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LJM

Philip G.Tlallof, Ph.3k., ^'.Eng. Geophysicist \*^ -^^ ^^- ^

S* OF o^

- 7 -

CERTIFICATE

I, Philip G. Hallof, of the City of Toronto, do hereby certify

that:

1. I am a geophysicist residing at Suite 3505, 2045 Lakeshore

Blvd., W. Toronto, Ontario.

2. I am a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a

B.Se. Degree (1952) in Geology and Geophysics, and a Ph.D. Degree (1957) in

Geophysics.

3. I am a member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists and the

European Association of the Exploration Geophysicists.

4. I am a Professional Geophysicist, registered in the Province of

Ontario, The Province of British Columbia and The State of Arizona.

5. I have no direct or indirect interest, nor do I expect to receive any

interest directly or indirectly, in the properties or securities of Seemar Mines

Limited, or any affiliate.

6. The statements made in this report are based on a study of published

geological literature and unpublished private reports.

7. Permission is granted to use in whole or in part for assessment and

qualification requirements but not for advertising purposes.

Dated at Toronto

This 15th day of March, 1984

Philip G. Hallof, Ph.D

PHOENIX Geophysics Limited

APPENDIX

THE INTERPRETATION OF

INDUCED POLARIZATION ANOMALIES

FROM RELATIVELY SMALL SOURCES

The induced polarization method was originally developed to detect disseminated sulphides and has proven to be very successful in the search for "porphyry copper" deposits. In recent years we have found that the IP method can also be very useful in exploring for more concentrated deposits of limited size. This type of source gives sharp IP anomalies that are often difficult to interpret.

The anomalous patterns that develop on the contoured data plots will depend on the size, depth and position of the source and the relative size of the electrode interval. The data plots are not sections showing the electrical parameters of the ground. When the electrode interval (X) is appreciably greater than the width of the source, a large volume of unmineralized rock is averaged into each measurement. This is particularly true for the large values of the electrode separation (n).

The theoretical scale model results shown in Figure l and Figure 2 indicate the effect of depth. If the depth to the top of the source is small compared to the electrode interval (i.e. d X) the measure ment for n = l will be anomalous. In Figure l the depth is 0.5 units (X = 1.0 units) and the n ** l value is definitely anomalous; the pattern on the contoured data plot is typical for a relatively shallow, narrow, near- vertical tabular source. The results in Figure 2 are for the same source with the depth increased to 1.5 units. Here the n - l value is not anomalous; the larger values of (n) are anomalous but the magnitudes are much lower than for the source at less depth.

When the electrode interval is greater than the width of the source, it is not possible to determine its width or exact position between the electrodes. The true IP effect within the source is also indeterminate; the anomaly from a very narrow source with a very large true IP effect will be much the same as that from a zone with twice the width and \ the true IP effect. The theoretical scale model data shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 demonstrate this problem. The depth and position of the source are unchanged but the width and true IP effect are varied. The anomalous patterns and magnitudes are essentially the same, hence the data are in sufficient to evaluate the source completely.

The normal practise is to indicate the IP anomalies by solid, broken, or dashed bars, depending upon their degree of distinctiveness. These bars represent the surface projection of the anomalous zones as inter preted from the location of the transmitter and receiver electrodes when the anomalous values were measured. As illustrated in Figure l, Figure 2 Figure 3 and Figure A, no anomaly can be located with more accuracy than the spread length. While the centre of the solid bar indicating the anomaly corresponds fairly well with the source, the length of the bar should not be taken to represent the exact edges of the anomalous material.

- 2 -

If the source is shallow, the anomaly can be better evaluatedusing a shorter electrode interval. When the electrode interval used approaches the width of the source, the apparent effects measured will be nearly equal to the true effects within the source. When there is some depth to the top of the source, it is not possible to use electrode intervals that are much less than the depth to the source. In this situation, one must realize that a definite ambiguity exists regarding the width of the source and the IP effect within the source.

Our experience has confirmed the desirability of doing detail. When a reconnaissance IP survey using a relatively large electrode interval indicates the presence of a narrow, shallow source, detail with shorter electrode intervals is necessary in order to better locate, and evaluate, the source. The data of most usefulness is obtained when the maximum apparent IP effect is measured for n ^ 2 or n ^ 3. For instance, an anomaly orginally located using X = 300' may be checked with X = 200' and then X * 100'. The data with X = 1 00" will be quite different from the original reconnais sance results with X = 300*.

The data shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 are field results from a greenstone area in Quebec. The expected sources were narrow (less than 30' in width) zones of massive, high-grade, zinc-silver ore. An electrode interval of 200' was used for the reconnaissance survey in order to keep the rate of progress at an acceptable level. The anomalies located were low in magnitude.

The very weak, shallow anomaly shown in Figure 5 is typical of those located by the X = 200' reconnaissance survey. Several anomalies of this type were detailed using shorter electrode intervals. In most cases the detail measurements suggested broad zones of very weak minerali zation. However, in the case of the source at 20N to 22N, the measurements with shorter electrode intervals confirmed the presence of a strong, narrow source. The X = 50' results are shown in Figure 6. Subsequent drilling has shown the source to be 12.5' of massive sulphide mineralization con taining significant zinc and silver values.

The change in the anomaly that results when the electrodeinterval is reduced is not unusual. The X ^ 5 0' data more accurately locates the narrow source, and permits the geophysicist to make a better evaluation of its importance. The completion of this type of detail is very important, in order to get the maximum usefulness from a reconnaissance IP survey.

Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies Scale Model Cases

io li li li n is n 17 li li

H li n / I.I l i.i vli u u

H , I I H/ ' M *'' *^v" " ' "li li li /i-1 1-1 i-*' i.t l.iNji . li l*

ii ii n /1,1 i.i i.i i.i i.i i.t N. u li liit ii li X. i i.i i.t i.i i.i i.i i.iN n H li

l l 11 t t 1 1 18 II 11 H 11 IS III 17 II

1.1 l l

(fe)o

i i i i i i i i i i u n u n n is u it 11 H

j

(Mf)o

f ii n ii i? H it ii n it ii

)|-IO ( P/Zir) 2 - 2-51

(Mf) ,* O (Mf) 2*10000

IllCtlff** CM^MMITIM { f C ) O ' 25X*- l ***-*l-0- t -* ** l L-" ———

I

VBlfi* M*l

PtM f III K

MlVtf tttt

•i" i ' l '-:

MlttfM,*!! IWt

•1 t M

CASE J-OJ5-BU-IO-0

Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies Scale Model Cases

i j i__t i ) i i ip H i; 11 M u it i; it ii

li ii li n f ,i.i yji ii il iiii H nx*Tii.i i.i vTXji ii ii

li il \\yt.\ I .I i.i i.i MN. u li uH u H/I.F i.i i.i i.i i.i i.t\i il il 'i

il ii H /i.i i.i i.i 1.1 i.i t.i i.i\ n H

t i i a; st til ii n u D n u H n u ii

i ii ii ii itt II l i.y l.f l l l l

l l .1.1 I.I^^J^^T^^J^S^l.l -l. l l li i .1,1 i.iX/rii A.i i.ij rlys.i.f i t i

l l .I.t I.I /l.l\ l,|\ M /i.i /i.|\ i.i .1.1 i i(f.lo

i i i j i s i \ t j it n u ti h H u n ii n

(Mf)o

' i ? j j t j j l inn it u H 'u H n A n

(Mf)- O

2-2-6

(Mf) 2* 9250

(ft) 2* 24X

CASE

THEORETICAL ' INDUCED POLARIZATION n (____ |0

AND n-2————K) 10

RESISTIVITY STUDIES l '.l~^" ,0 W n '0

SCALE MODEL CASE

PLAN VIEW

6 7 69 10 II l? ft 14 Ifr Ifr

97 6 8 9 7 \ IO 10 1095 ST 87 95\IO 10 IO

6 8 B 9 68 93\IO 10 K)68 90 90 68 92 \ 10 JO 10

! t' to IZ 14

*- ( -**- nx -*-- x

^7X EQUALS l UNIT

7 69 K) II 12 13 14 15 16

-O2 o -OS/ 07^36

Q O -o 0740n-3 ——— O O -On-4— O -03

8 9 10 H 12 g 14 l?

n .l —————— n Q ,49 72^410

n -2————— o O -59 74^460 46n-3——— O O -59 75^^34) 489n-4—O -30 -59 Xl4Tx^382 467 467

B 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16

-10

(Mf), - O (Mf )g* 11700

(Fe) 2 * sov,^DEPTH EXTENT OF SOURCE

l 4UNITS

FIG3

THEORETICAL 6——s——T P——?——e—u—12—12—*—is—*

NDUCED POLARIZATION B.,____ I0 |0 9 M M )0 ^ '}oAND n-2 ————— 10 10 10/97 91 91 97\IO 10 10

n .3———10 10 10/97 9 2 92 92 9-7\ 10 10 10RESISTIVITY STUDIES n-4-io 10 .o Ae 93 93 93 93 96\ .o ro ro

SCALE MODEL CASE

PLAN VIEW

S 676 ? Ip II 12 13 14 15 16

lFe)on -] ——————— o O -03 O/// 35 \s\0 -03 O O

n -2 ————— O .0 -08 0 ///3B 3 8l\SP -08 O O n-3———O O -08 Q^W45 45 4-6^^S.05 -08 O O n -4—O O -07 ' 08^^-2 /5^1 "s-TN 42\N\ O7 -07 O O

5 678 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 '__16

10 : iz (Mf)o-3O

n .4 — 0 O -70

678 9 Ip H 12 13 14 16

\ /' { p2lr} , |0 ( x, 2 7r) '24I~

^ V (Mf)| -0 (Mf ) 2 '22800

X EQUALS 1 UNIT (Fe)2 . 55V.

-T '

DEPTH EXTENT Of SOUACC 14 UNITS

FIG 4

INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS

BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC. .

isoo/v *sooix woo '

4040 f SI70

•t— 1500 f / 4BOO. 3960 \ f 7600 J /YZOSO

12200 VJMOO\I6QO

60 \ /7600 J //Z030 J //900 X/

ON I2N I4N ' 1GN ION 20N 22N ' 24N 26N 28N

INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY.RESULT

BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC,

l — 0-IJ O-tl O-M O 0-8* 0-1H ''1[X/

•J ———— 0'67 0-19 0-18 0-Z 0-88 0-78 ' Ol M, F.) i

•0-38 '0-1 0-ZZ 0-Z8 0'B8 0-11 Ot

ION 12N I4N I6N I8N 20N 22N 24N 26N 28 N

19 N 20N -- 21N 22N 23 N

H4-0-S8 0-12

0-38 tnr.tt,M

22N 23 N

.1——0-13 , J 1 -3 1-4

S ^——V

GLACIAL OVERBURDENION I2N I4.N I6N - I6N 20N 22N 24N 26N 28N

MASSIVE SULPHIDE ZONE

FIG. 5

MASSIVE SULPHIDE ZONE *—

GREENSTONE

FIG. 6

B. BOOS C L fi I MS L I ME -e XMQ0F RHO (OHM-M)

J '2 l 3 110 111 l "T2"DIPOLE NUMBERCOORDIHRTE 1650S 1450S 1250S 1950S 65 0SINTERPRETRT I OH

- N s 2

- N s 3

- H z 4

. M s 5

- H s 6

-^218i?. 4436 \ 6357 ^ \ 13K \,7965/^ 1822^r 13 \ 7.B x\ 16 /^.177// 77 ^x 284^x709/^1

5487 ' 4423 ; 7S7tf' v^liT^1626^10 14 'f. 5 W 26 ":vx 73^/260x^^46^ 424 ,•' \ - ^ xy 'JaS**?*' r^L-j-"- ' "-' 'j ',\ --S yv. ,^ /v -^

473?.X54W \ 9772^1675Jjf3?K^'leXltSt 12 12 \ 28^244 xT 86 V^331 X^l

54ft4 623? ;

6474 x

r ?.o

r X-'-— r.57 '^--?* 23 ^ 71 '37 -' 3

B BOOS CLfllMS '

DIPOLE NUMBERCOORDINATE 1650S

LIHE-0 X^100F PHRSE ':i.0H2?

12 13 | 4 .1 5145.0S 1250S

16171050S

18191850S

10 111 112 1650S 450

INTERPRETRT I OH . .•H* l 8.4 x 12

i

•N*3 12

•H* 4

\ 18 19 ^7.4^-x 37

14 ) 19 17 ff 35 \

i 16 16 /7 34 (33)S ——————— ( /s

K 12 Y'' 33 '(36)

12 A' 2? TN (34)

3? VvZ!

(34) 32.

(35) (40)

(36) TN

\101 v\ 60

(30) /; \\ 111 ^ 52

1 (66) 54*— — •^(35)^ (68) 56

(109)Xx (71) "'

60 72 58 \

6V^\r250 y 86 76 ^5-

/' 79 82 /' 63

^77 ^79 71

POWERLINE

B. BOOS CLfilMS LIHE-0 X*100F METflL FflCTOP

DIPOLE NUMBER 12 13 14 l 10 l l 11CQORDINRTE 1650S 145GS 1250S 1050S S50S 650S 456INTERPRETATION

•N*l

•N*2

•Ns3

•Ns4

• N s 5

• N s 6

.4 630

3 .2 .1 ^-'2.2^(276) 2587"M592) ^425^^71

.3 ^ x^x 2^y^:(892)|^( 171 )\^(435) ^vj 548)\\ 191 *"/) -i\\ rxscate. \\ j ' ^^*

.2 y y3.1 -^(452) (402),^((75r^- (217))) (621)

••^4.5 TN (171) (157) TN (547) x-(2?ft)

M E - Q RHO (OHM-M)

3 l 4 j T l l 0 111 112 113 114 |15 116 117 118 119 l 2 Q l 2*1 T e. *-1450S 1250S 850: 150M 3 5 DU

357, \ 13K

406 '\ 9772,4

434 ''-^650

16 '"%-JZIx/ r? /'' 2S4 X- 709 ''V38 \\221 \\634 rv, 1616 \2180 2144 2121

V'v' 26 ':\:x^3^/' 260 /C^&fa 424^118^214X^83 \\1605\2550 2799 2?2© f] \\ \\ Xv xjx X// ^/V \.—^.1—, vN v-"'——— \ '—————

12 \v 28^:^244^^86^^331/^187^414 \ 252^\X876'X 1255') \2519 (3652 3695X //j ' s-fel^, y^ X,' //' ,——^, •"^^——;x ; \ -. .

X li )^X.76 X"^*Q ^f ^83 A;i95xX 434 /' 645: \\J241 Xx 67? /\45^4 \ 2?i2/ 451S

'20 24^-^13^^311 '^"237 x 383 -1 '574 •X763V;:'^ ''''iH'^ ^ 96SN' l 1667'--3324

f^l

9 = 2

MS 3

\\-A

H'5

N*6

• HE-0

|2 i 3l 145.0S

1 18 1?

K 19

Il6 16m— —— . Sr^Kl!2 -^2?

X^100F PHflSE

1 4 .1 5 16 171250S 1050S

—* ————————— | ————————— ( ————————— ( ———————

\M4^ ^ 3? \i|L17 ,,^ 35 \( 28) j 36

/X 34-. (33) (34) '#52)x' - ' —— —

33 '(36) (35) (48)

TN (34) (36) TN

C 1 .0HZ?

1819850S

— i ————— \ ————s 101 xv ^0 - — -^^. \\

(30)^'v\lll x

(66) 54-— i— .(35)^ (68)

•^u —— i— \

(109)Xv (71)

i 10 1 11650S

— t ————— i ———60 72

f52 62 S

50 ;f 867

50 /' 79

^77 '^

1 12 1 13 I450S

— i ————— i ————— t —58 \ 80 x

79 ^\ 72 61

76 ) 63 ( ,*

82 X 63 56

71 58

14 I 15 1 16 1 17 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22256S 50S 150H ' 350N

——— i ————— i ————— t ————— , ————— t ————— ( ————— i ————— i ————58 ^Jtf^ \ 2S \ 18 17/11 N*l -

f' ——— ™l ^. —— -- N *, '

\Ql \ 62 X;. 21 }/ l i 11 11 M*2 -\ X \.\ f/ , ——— v

46^Y\ 89 \ 57 \4C 14 ';i'6-9 "X\ 12 ( 9-7 H :: 3 '

51 \ 89 \ 50X;\ 15 \X6-S ^ X 1P N*4 -X ^^^"^- ^v, m '* - - \ X\

60 } 48 N v 76 ^ 51 -^ 15 X " : 5.3 H*5 -

POWERLINE

HE-0 METftL FflCTOP

1314 i e i 11 -121450S i25es 850S 650S. 45GS

13 l 14250S

l 17^ 18T 1 Ci 21ses l 5OH 350N

IUII

^9 .^ 2-JjT N30"5 XN?!:I x 630 ^ ^i^/ VZ8-^

^ 425 \71 x/ 24y\ r—\ / \ \ /^ ' N\^(892)774(171)Hv(435) v^548)\^191 ^^ 21 J V^

F '\~^^ \ s?**^: —— N^ v^\ f/ '•^^(452) (402)^(75)^- (217)) V (621))^ 66^-"^ 132

58 x\ 26\

X?\ 17 ;) \ 52 ; 33 -

.8 .8

(171) (157) TN

^ s 6 r~-x)/' 32 //{ 13 { 7.9

''' ' '3@ '

H s l -

.4

41 xx 5.2

H l 14 115116 117 118119 l 0256S 50 15SN 350H

^8 ,\ 221 x\ 634 t \ \1616 \218d 2144 XX \\ ; \\ \

2121

s 214 C; \1605 \2550 2793 2320""'•x -*'n ( 3652 3699

4518

4

21 l 2 2

Ha l

N^2

'' 434 /y 64?: ^^241 " :s'-v 677 Vi, '15*4 \ 2912) ,'' N'i N\ f \ \

3 ff 574 •••'763" :-^''!83^v -'' 96S X- l 1667V -'332' H = 5

DWG M O. - l . P -5370-

SEEMAR MINES L IMITED6 . BOOS T L ft I M S

HEMLO fiREfl ONTARIO

I

LINE NO . -i?

13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 2256S 50S 150N ' 350N

88

63

\28' \ 13

61 \ 31 X 62 N/. 21\\ f

\ 89

56 51 \ S? \

58 60/ '

''

17 s 1 1

11 11 11

12

C^ 15 \^ 6.8W ":;X 51 V^V 15 : 5.8

N*2 -

^X—Xr

JLJ.

PLOTTING POINT ——

SX s 100'

SURFACE PROJECTION C'F flNOMflLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE ————— VPPOBflBLE •••••••••* ^POSSIBLE •m^'v^.^ V

13 l 1 4 [ 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 l 22250S 0S 15 CM 35EIN

FREQUENCY (HERTZ)I.S HZ.

NOTE- CONTOURS flT LOGARITHMIC INTERVALS, l , - i 5 -2, -3, -5.- -7.5. -l d

1984

PHOEHIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED r : LflRIZRTIQN

fi N D REST!.": V I T Y S U R V E Y

B . BOOS C L ft I M'S ' L I N E - 2 E RHO -TOHM-M)

1 9" i 10 l 11 l 12 l 13D I F' Q L E H U M B E R,C O O R D I H ft T E 1308 S l 6 O Q S l 4 0 6 S 12085 i o o e s 800S seesI H T ERFRETftTION

S l

S 4

H ^ 6

4868 3 ^Jll^y 96 ^1388 1373 Yx2365/ 1833^^20^-^ 142

25i "\5^^:;"15KJ^;^/ :, 8 ^ 16 fcjav213 jg"

8686, -: : -' 1:?

35

B .

DIPOLECOORDI

BOOS C

N U M B EHftTE

I H T E R F R E T ft T I- H s 1

- H s 2

L ft I M S

R18

ON10

00S

12

16 \

LINE-2E

1 2 11600

— i ————— ( —

^~" x* A jf A J ,

X=100F PHBSE (1

31415S 1400S———— H ————— i ————

.y/ V— -f/i' 45 ^.(24)

l 6 11200

— i ————— * —,-' 25 f///

(24)A"V 89

7 1';,

OQ , .\. ^ ^,

8HZ)

S i 91000S

. 49 y 65

74 6

110 111800S

i ————— i ——— 50 62

8 xTiT

1 1260

f' -.10 1/,'' '-~^c 33 #Y-J

1 130S

4 ————————

- 58

302?:\ 7

- N - 5

— 24/450) TN TN ( 42)

(44) TN TN (44) ''

-' (93) ) 70 83 31

. .

^ (g?) -^(26) (76) x 167 TN

•' ^

98

POWERLINE

B. BOOS CLft I MS LINE-2E METflL FftCTOR

i 4 l 5 i 6 l 7 l lie 111 112 113D I P O L E H U M B E RC CO R D I H ft T E 18O 0 S 1400: l 2 8 8 S 1000! 300: 600SINTERPRETftTIOH.

•f^3

• UxC,

.2V;-...

27 T; (598)

2-j^x- 3j4^fygg5Ay 41

\^TN

TN (201)^(67)—-^ TN (127) -^(35)

/•' /f 43

31^)^88 ""-^24 W , x/ \' "- 1/ ™

(5S3)V - '' 160 TN 33

X s l 0 @ F R H O f. O H M - M )

3 i

X * 1 0 0 F PHRSE

4 | 5 1 6 1 71400S 12003

(1 . 0 H Z )

18 19 1 10 1 11 110003 800S

.12 113 114 |15 i 1 6 117 118 119 120 i 2 1

600S 400S 200S 0 200Hl 2 2

• -tiiiii

V\^ 45

49)

TN

TN

67 x 42 x 25 /,-y 89

^(24) (24y\\ 89 ^\

(40) TN (49) j (69)

TN (42) d50) Cx^—— — -^^^

TN (44) '(26) -^8

,- -,. 49 ,' 65 50 62 f' --

51 74 68 /'" 75 93jf \ f

/' ( 93) J 76 ' 83 99

(96) x (73) TN 117 \ 88fc""'" S'^- (67) "'(26) (76) ^ 107

Jgl^ 58 53 -^45 \-^^^5-7 e-4 5.9

^^^\72 <yi^)7^x42 \ Z4 :\J-?/ 5.7 /' 4.1vx ~-"i- — -^ — - \ \. NI'V .' -'

~fCi "Vv 71 "J-^ V "f* *- A n \ •'-•-' '-NV *T ~J -1' yl "J ,1 1 r J xv. Ol -5 'C. x ii ••-. 41;? sx i/ ^^.^b.i- ^-' 4. r 4.1

- " 100^S- 10"*^- 30 \ 64 N\ 43 \ 28 v^^ 2.3 "N, 3.1x '"'N '"^-— ^gT — " f

TN 98 TN 31 v 59 v 41 3© "^ 4

1-1=1 -

H'2 -

H-3 -

' N s 4- -

H e — D "

H a 6 .-

POWERLINE

X=100F METflL FfiCTOR

l 5 10 l l 12 L 13 14 l 17 l 18 19 l 21 l 221400S 1203S 1000S 3003 600S 400S 200: 0 2 e e H

•HinMUMUIN

TN TN (351) A * (48) (583) -'160

^227 ^/(598) '"(299)

25?) ' 1563) TN (260)\J459) (465)x'.-^"^^^"*!

TN TN (201^(67) .1

(127) --(35) 1-1 =

16 17 18 19 c y3 e s 2 0 0 S 2 0 e H

632 11

1208 126S38 A1764 1822

'•- 5626747^2614 2463

-'32?!

14 l 15 k 16 l 17 l IS 119 l 20. l 21 i~2400S 200S e e o N

53 -^

42

6.4 5.9

) 5.7/4.1/

32 V 72 \ 49 \ 27""

30 \ 64 \ 43 \28

TN 31 x 5? 41

. -,"

4.7 4.1

3.1

N a 6

14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 l 2 2400S 200: 2 0 6 N

S

DUG NO . - I . P -5370-2

SEEMflR MINES LIMITEDB B O : S C L ft I M S

HEMLO flFr* ONTflPIO

LINE ND . -2 E

<— X—-X- -X—X-

-01

PLOTTING

SURFACE PROJECT 10"- OF ftHOMflLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE PPOBRBLE POSSIBLE

r ••••••••it ^z ^ ^^^.-^ V

FREQUENCY (HERTZ? 1.0 HZ .

NOTE- CONTOURS RT L O G R R I T H M I C INTERVflLS. l,-l.5- 2 , - 3 , - 5 , - 7 . 5 , - l 0

D B T E S 1984

DfiTE

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD

INDUCED F ' LRRIZflTION

ND RESIST: vi TV SURVEY

B. BOOS CLRIMS L I N E-4 E X*100F RHO COHM-M)

D I P O L E H U t1 B E R 3 l 4 Tie l 11 i 12 i 1.3-C O O P D I H R T E 1600 S 14Q0S 1000! S 0 0 S goe;INTERPPETflTION

3672^r 61 N^ 127/^2583 \167l v^4657/ \\18K// 6731 5423^ y 9257 ^ l IK //y \2S 11 /f x^714 ^

•H* 3 113 A, 50—i- ^ ' X•' 6 7 ,- x, '' 964) \

srs ( 4176 '*-'389 Vx ' 1144

\4411 3211 3438H\1331\ ff 'V

2527 ^1346Xs2365 2897^254^116

^™*T319

640

480 •-~^s. 683 v 408

B .

DIPOLCOORDINTER

- N s 1

•N*2

44 = 3

•H*4

•H.6

BOOS CLRIMS LINE-4E X=100F PHRSE -C1.0H2) l

E NUMBER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1.9 110111 12ll3l|INRTE 1300S 1600S 1400S 1200S 1000S 300S 600S 1PRETRTION i t i i i i t i t i i' i J

45 r- 70 -, 34 x 27 \ 39 \v 1S S 2® 23 y ^ 30 36 47 /' 5- X 32 /^'

68 \\(106jfc;-\48 \29 X 36 X 22 25 \ 40 36 36 \ 54 52 ^ 82 y '^^]

62 (55) *50^\ 22 \ 38 \ 25 29^* 30 45 48^ 5S: 74 52^

(57) /(42) 43 \ 24 \ 38 v 21 /' 37 ( 20 )y 66 58 f 78 } ~/ 43 (4CV^ X. \ ^ N ——— *~~t:~ X- ——— X*

(57) "'- (48) 46 x 29 TN 41 43 '"(73) 6 1 70 ^44 41

POWERLINE

X=10eF METRL FRCTOFB. BOOS CLRIMS ' LIHE-4E

DIPOLE NUMBER 110 111

INTERPRETflTION

,3 /jc' 1.7 xf \\ 8.3'

1.1 \s 2.3 .4

9 ^X2-l /\ .3 ^;V—-' v^

(144)13 '

(157)N (134)' '9.8

3.8 - .2

" x 9.5 ^"36 ^ ^ZA^ ' 10

X*100F RHO (OHM-M)

1406S 12 0 e sT9 l 9 l 18 l 11 l 12 l 13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l IS l 19 l 20 l 21 l 22

1000S s 0 e s 600S 400S 200 206N

.2583 s 167 1 \N 4657/ \ \18K// 6fc, /- —— -X XN f \-— — ~ "

9257 ^\2311 A v.71\ X/ V;\

14 24

^^284^,1710/^7335 5418/^2451 X 4411 3211 3438 ) ^133^^9^/^2330/1932 ^6#

Tj^^;7006V:^575^31^^726' \ 2527 ^i346\:,2365 2897\^254 \^ 16^^218X^2161X^.

'5/^^44^ 356 323 364/538

576 541 635 /" 882

*2 X& UK Wl00 1/964Y\ 1854 "X. 2322^3/764 K\\ 1714,^319 480^•"•'•-' - t.'.' ^!*,. s i -, --———,/f.- —————— VN—^—'ST' —^. — —^^B^***t^ v'% l Ir-. .^?\1W^' so**/ ^. ioc"t x c.^c.c.s// r ot \\ if i*tx0/ ^-i^ i*v ^m. to /^^ij'.."--/ \ ^rr":- -^iiH^i 1.1^:? i c.* 3

^. ^^s^/ \ /,-^r-. l 'x *"—p^--——---±zsg^r\ ,-—-\ ^^ ^ f \ /---,V-____,,. .3^.^) 464^* 4176^*389 x--''1144 "- 1638-^542 640 -^ 194 v- ' 683 x 408 "^ 47^**' 1 875"—' 40ft0 NN 1509 1592^ 1462

X866 858 868 f 1 105 1264' XT

t13587\ 2996 "-V1140 1229 1205 1431y \

H s

X=100F PHflSE (l.0H2)

1.9 l 10 l 11 l 12 l 13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 l'1400S 200: 000S 8 0i3 S 600S 400S 200S 0 200H

27 \ 39 \\ 18 s 20

X. 29 x \

22X\ 22 \ 38 X 25

\43 X 24 \ 38 ' 21

(48)X

46 x 29 TN 41

POWERLINE

METflL FflCTOP

1 7 l S l 9 110 111 112 113 114 115 J16 117 118 li 9 l 20 l ~TT c. z.1400S 1200S 1000S 300S 600S 400S 200S 0 :00N

m. .3 Xx 1.5 -vx .8

.6 v

.6 v 1.8 x .08 .6c\

.f

A .3

.9 .4 '\ 1.3 \ .07 .4 .2

10 TN .8 .3 x 1.T'- .04 .3

1-1 -

15 l 1 6 l 17 110

20 l 21 l 220 0 H

356

576 541 S35/'" 882

858 868 /7l05 1264

!)\ 299SJXll40 1229 1205 1431

73- v' 40a0 N:"" 7s09 1592"^ 14*52

N s 1 -

H" 4

N = 5

DWG HO -I P -5370-3

S E E M R R MINES LIMITEDB. BOOS CLAIMS

HEtlLO AREA x ONTARIO

LINE NO.-4E

•Ntf- \, /-. _ V - - -——. . ... —— 7 ^ -

r~®nrr rr

r*-.

PLOTTING POINT ——

SURFflCE PROJECTION OF ANOMALOUS ZONE

DEFINITE PROBABLE POSSIBLE ^^^

FREOUEHCY (HERTZ) l 0 H2

NOTE- C O M T O U PJB AT'LOGARITHMIC INTERVALS, l,-1.5-2--3,-5,-7 . 5,- 10

DATE S APPROV

384

DATE

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED P O L R R I Z R T I O H

RHD RESISTIVITY SURVEY

B. BOOS C L R I M S : L IN E-6 E XM00F RHO (OHM-M)

DIPOLE H UMBER 1415 1718 i e in r 12 i 13 . l UCOORDINATE 1300S 16Q0S l 4 0 6 S S09S 606SI N T ER P P E T R T I O N

*k

-'7574 -' '4809 x 2494 '"1209^ 2674 x 1522 v x 3247

3456 4255 ^1907 /' 1030 x;v 681 f*v-y—-j'1704X^-*

950

B BOOS CLAIMS : LI

DIPOLE NUMBER 1COORDINRTE 1300 SINTERPRETATION

9=1 69 64 \x

9 = 2 53 51

9 = 3 *Z)

•9 = 4 58

•9 = 5

•9 = 6

NE-6E

2 1 3160QS

———— i ———31 35

X"*6 f61 '\ 30'

(68) M\

56 (55)

X-190F PHASE

1

— i —

729

\

.28\

4 1 51400S

28 x 34 "v

'^4 ^v

27 23

26

2? -'30

1611200

— i ————— t —

\5^X, 33 X 23\ 35

2f. \ 3q130

73

21

31

36

' l . 0 H2 )

18 191000S

^ x 14 / s 3 1

28 /*" 33

33 36

32 37

36 37

1 10

x 25"X

34 \

32

35 ,,mf'

, f'' 57

1 11 1 12 1 13 18003 600S

' '21 y 3V^-4/^25^X 33 f* 24 '^^^1.-

/50~^ (' 26 22 ^7 7 V "-' 51 /" 31 \ 28 267 \. ————

-1 32 30 32

1-fer3

^'POWERLINE

B. BOOS CLRIMS : LINE-6E XMQ0F METRL FACTOR

DIPOLE MUHBER J__L l 8 110 111 l 12 l 13 l lCOOPD IN R T E 1800S 1600S 1400! 1200S 1000: S00S 600SINTERPRETATION immnn

115 116 117 l 18 119 l 20 i 21 | 22400S 260 H

N s 2793 /\y*67 359 x 255 ,- 397 x 553l- — --' V!- —— r — ——— "— — ' 536

7 X582 X 647 X" 865

^2623\1524^.^36\^591 ('889 960 732

X,749^ 964 881 .

1 = 2 H

N-4 H

822^'- 4249 "x 2766 "^ 1470 ^ 773 84?"

DUG. NO.-I p-53TO-4

SEEMflR MINES LIMITEDB BOOS CLAIMS

HEMLO AREA ONTARIO

LINE M O . - 6 E

l 13 l 14 i is i 16 l 17 l is l 19 l geLgjr7T~Ig!60QS 400S 2Q0S 0 00N

15 V S:, 4.0 \// ! y

N = 4 -

H X -

PLOTTING POINT —— -\ x.

SURFflCE PROJECTION OP flNOMfiLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE —————— TPROBABLE •••••••t*i ^7POSSIBLE ^^^ V

:. t

lERLINE

^ l 13 .1 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 T 19 120 { 21 l 22"600S 409S 200S 0 2 0 0 N

2.7 3.8 XV-.08

|2 "' ' 1-9 N N 3.7

FREQUENCY (HERTZ)1.0 HZ.

NOTE- CONTOURSflT LOGARITHMICI N T E R V R L S . l , - l 5

DRTE RPPROV

SUP, 984

DATE

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED POLARIZATION

AND P E S I S T l V I T Y S U RVE V

B . BOOS C L R I M i - L l M E-8 E X - l e 0 F P H O r O H M - M )

DIPOLE H U M BEFC O O P D I N R T E___17-0 0 l l 5 O C S 130CS i lees sees

111 112 113oes -00s

MM

•9 = 2

• H = 3

• H = 4

•9 = 5

•9 = 6

110 -V;4e2b 4756

?88.,--"~~ 5443 ' 12

/X 9455,,;. \2411 f - 5188. :-:-\326 x679 533 \ 3334

5 Jy62i35xv' l Vf 'M 3 7ir 420e 3707X^939 \ 636 f

087? x-2570 -

JVC'4133 4604 .-"2616 2457

825 j' 1302^

1002 ( 1 862

X 2247 2444 2477 X 3937^ 1247 1246 V- '^

B. BOOS CLfllMS LIHE-8E X*100F PHRSE t. l . 9

DIPOLE NUMBER l l e 111 l 12 113C O O R D I H fi T E 1700S 1500S 1300S l l O O S 'if 03 i00SI H T E R P R E T R T I O N

1-4=1 33 .- 29___29 25 -,. 38 30.- 25 ; \ li __ 12 l^y ^ 2 1 v^^l-9 \ l ^

44 ^ 26 /' 36 }' v\ 13 ; \ 24 \ 41 \29 /' 16 ? i ~*^///' 27 22 27 :^jr4-4 ~2

32 **/' 2 1 X 16 \ 24 \ 37 ^ ^ 16 X 10 /X 27 /' 31 \ 22 ^3fv\^^-6.3'—— \ /.--'^ /' f \ \ X^ 42 y' 20 24 . 17 \21 22^;/ ^ }// ^ ^38 _ 3 1 \ 22 \ 33 xx^C~

29 23 25 N ' 14~~ ^73^-- ^ 14 ''^27 -7 33 - 28 ' 32 X " 23 \ 35^

- M s 6

POWERLINE

DC

B. BOOS CLfllMS LIHE-8E

IPOLE NUMBER l 2 l 3OORDIHRTE 1788-S 1500S

? ^mmm^B^m ;v^.-w^

X = 1 O 0

14151300S

F M E T fl L

1 6 11 10

t

0S

F fi C T 0 R

J 8 1900S

a 1 10 i 11

700S1 12

5k •IHmilllttUIUIIHIIIIIHIH

100

— l —

1s

3 |

— iMM .6 \ 1.1

.4

.4 .3

.4

-.4 .3

.4 .2

,

^.7 v;.^2.3 \ 3.8 ^ -.5

•' 1 1 ~- x X- r\\ ^ 4 -- 7 Qi* i v *O '\ " \ ^*" '-N O*O

A

.4

.1

.1 .1

.2 , 1.1

7 - J' i -;- ir• •^* X.h. ^. 11l* x

\'- ~~—:

c- \ x l o v.C1 1.'^ ^ o(

x - 1 0 0 F P H 0 r 0 H M - M :^

i30es 9 6 D Sl 10 l 11 l 12 l 13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l ~T8~ 19

7005 sees 00s 190S 1 0 0 Hnn

3 00 H

29.' - t-267 5288 x4561,,;- 9455,,;. \24117 -5188. \\326 -x.679 533 \334 319

3717 4206 3707""X?3Sl v 63* -r 9®5 X 610Nx\

387 402 460 404 378

37-47 f :. 9?3//s

l^i/ .V. -7-*--. —' lil K f,y' 3 i w .-

f'/''087; ,- 2570 3

554 615 606 60? 509"'--, 430

825 7 1382 1007 1415X.706 799 656 527 X. 489

642? 5670)'vX 21KX^4133 4604 .-"2616 2457 -, 3728Xx^l 102 1002 ( 1862 X 1214 ^98 754) 690 608 551

^- *"3?3 '"'?86e -'674? x 4784 -'2247 2444 2477 N 3937^-1247 1246 X ''2133"-;"x 1491 X 932 ''"06 633 617

H - 1 -

PHflSE t. l . 0 HZ)

15 I 16 l 1

30.- 25 / \ H

2.1^3^,4.5V; 4.3 -A 4 .1\VCJ\24 'x 41 \29 / 16' '16 S 10^X27 /' 31 \ 22 -3.6 1.416 24 5 -5.1

31 22 ^___ ' '- V"

POWERLINE

X=100F METFIL FfiCTOR

? 41516171819110)111300S 1100S 900S 700S

i 12.1 13500S

v*.-*. ••NmmMMnnmMHtiMMH— —— ————— i ————— i ————— i ————— i ————— t ————— t ————— i ————— " ————— " ————.l/ .4 .7 .7 .3 .5 .2 \\1.7 ..- \3~~" 'K ,V /' \

.T .2 .7 .3 .4 .2 .7 *vs!\2.3 \ 3.8

-.4 .3X-,\

1 14 | 15 1 16 1 17 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22300S 100S 100H 300H-

V 1.3 1.3 1.2 ,- .7 xj^/ .6 N*l -

-.3 .2 .7 .4 .7 -.08 y 1 ' Hs2 -

.4

.4

.3 .4 .2 y'' 1.1 '"-, .8 \Nx 2.4 \ 3.8 \\ -.5 -.4V "V ' - "'. V ^E.

1 7 ''" 1 "^ 17 11"- P ^ "-- l ft v ? o '^•- — "^. l *O i**l i.%5 1*1 kO l**J t.*v . -'

.1 .3 .5 .02 .7

-.1 .4 -.1 .4 -.3

-.4 .01 -.1 .4 -.8

-l

MS 4

N ' 5

A T 15 l 16 li 18 119 120 l 2160S 109S 100N 00 H

319 387 402 460 404 378

554 615 606 60? 509 X 430

007 1415^/^706 70'? 656 527 X X4S9

^.;89S 754) 6?0 608 551 ":133v'x 032 ' 766 633 617

1-1=1 -

14 l 15 I 16 117 I 18 T 19 21 1 22300S 100 100H 00N

,' 4 .8 3.2

4.5 2.4 } 4.3 / -.4 4.1s t s A? yv".1 ^~- .- -^ ^ *#-

3.6 \ 1.4' .2.3 s' 3.3, -IF . 1 ^-C 3.5 y^ -5.1\,...,.,, "'w-- . ' c/-^ ' ••'••'' '- ~ —^'/'

-4 -.1 '^^3.2,4f -1 /^y 2.5 jf -4.6'-••••nTS'i^' /'V fe

7.2 -5.5 .1 -.8 ^2.3 -*'' ' -5.1

H — 3

Ns4

H - 5

14 l 15 l 16 117 j 1 8 119 I 20 l 21300S 100S 100N 306H

1.3 1.3 1.2.,- .7 vJL-' .6

.2 .7 .4 .7 -.08 \± i

-.4 .1 .3 .5 .02 .7 -l

-.3 -.1 .4 -.1 ' .4 -.8

-.3 -.4 .01 -.1 .4 -.8

11=1 -

\\ = 3

f^4

DWG H O.-I.P-5370-5

S E E M fl R MINES LIMITEDB . B O O S C L R I M S

HEMLO fiREfl x ONTflRIO

LINE NO .-SE

N y. -V^r—X-

r-EHrH rr ! i

PLOTTING POINT —— X" l 08'

SUPFfiCE PROJECTION OF RNOMflLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE . ————" TPROBfiBLE ••••••••M JpPOSSIBLE ^^^^^ V

FREQUENCY (H E R T 2) l . 0 H2

NOTE- CONTOUR? R T LOGftRITHMIC INTERVfiLS. l,-l.5 -2,-3,-5, -7. 5,-10

DflTE flPPRO

1984

DPTE

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.INDUCED POLfiPIZftTION

ft N D R E S I S T I w I T Y S U R V E Y

wMinistry ofNaturalResl

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Type of Survey(s)

Claim Holder(s)

Address

Survey Company

42C13NW0071 8.6590 MOLSON LAKE

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

TDate of Survey (from Si to)O*H 02 S4 i n oa ^.4] Day L.Mo, J ^r - J-?iV j MouJ- Yr^

Total Miles of line Cut

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days H) 'CJ

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here ,, ,

MINING

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

k ki V E DA i vwr*

- Magnetometer

LANt^rSfCTIO- Other 1^

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

——————

Days per Claim

——————

4

JSl

Days perClaim

— - ———

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may ho apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits por claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

TBNumber

feViS^fe \ Zft^ \O l ^ 1, If*

Expend. Days Cr.

^^3^vio f*

- ••- —

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

— ————— — — - —

--

Expend. Days Cr.

—— -- —

—————

Total number of mining ^ claims covered by this *N report of work, **^

For Office Use OnlyTotal DaysCr.pate Recorded Recorded

fiCertification Verifying Report of Work

o, having performed the workl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexec or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address ol Person Certi

13G2 (81/9)

Ontario

To

Actidn T me Memo,

A'om (Name and City) jf j

^ /ri g , A* : jtsvuck^ ~ ^^~~ ^^-Area Code i Telephone No Message Taken By

f| PhonedOn

LJ Hold

Q Please Call Q Will Call BackP.. Returned .—.l_l Your Call l_l Wishes Appointment

r~| Waiting — in Person D Was Here

l Will 1 Return

QF.Ie

O Type Draft

[~] Type Final

Draft Reply For Q Provide Q] For Your . My Signature More Details Information

D For Your Approval r—i Keep Me anrt Rinnalnro l—' Informedand Signature

[—j Circulate, Initial — and Return

n Takek-J Appropriate Action

r—j Make ____ Return Copies '—' With CommentsD D Note and

See Me

fi Please Answer R l nves"9ate L-' L-' and Reportjport D Note and

Return

r~l Per Discussion

1~1 Per Your Request

D Returned With Thanks

D

Comments''

',.-Vi ^fit " -7 ' '

7540-1037 (Rev. 11(82) Q Over

1984 05 08 Our File: 2.6590

Mrs. A.M. HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

He have received reports and maps for a Geophysical {Enduced Polarization) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 613970 et al In the Area of Molson Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and astatement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which Is normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours ilncerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Managment Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

A. Barr:me

cc: Bernard Boos Seemar Miner Ltd Suite 19777 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 1X7

Ministryof Geotechnical

Ontario ^ Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Comments

l l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

DTo: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

[~\ A pproved [~| Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

t L/*

l l Approved [~"[ W ish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

aen

i

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder{s)_

i -

Survey Company VH/yC*^ K Cy*

Author of Report -

Address of Author.Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer_

—Radiometric——

—Other—————.

DAYS per claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic,(enter days per

** . .1

eton). Radiometric

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

SEC?/

TC^TAL CLAIMS.

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

SURVEYS^ If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations

Station interval

Profile scale ^————

Contour interval.

Number of Readings

Line spacing ———

H W ^O

Instrument .

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value —^—

W

InstrumentH W

dttH U W

flnil rnnfigiiratinn

Coil separation

Arnirary

Method: CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line Frrnnenrv

CD Parallel line

l

Parameters measured.

Instrument.Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

H

N

W UD Q

Elevation accuracy.

InstrumentMethod 52*rimc Domain

Parameters - On time- Off time __

Power.

— Delay time —.

— Integration time.\

CD Frequency Domain Frequency ——— Range

.

9Electrode array — Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument—-————^^———.—-^—————————^——-.——^—^——————— Range.Survey Method ,^^———-————-———^^———^—^———————————.———.—.—

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument ———Values measured.

Energy windows (levels)——^.^-^——--^-—.^^—..—.—.^^—-—.,.^^^—.——-....———.——. Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count.

Size of detector—^-^^——-^^^———^^-^^—-—————-—————.^——--—.^^——..

Overburden ————^^—:—^—^———-^—^——.-——-.—^.—.——^^—.-.————.—^—-(type, depth — include outcrop map)

|OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey^^——-.———^———-—^^^^-^————

Instrument —.^^.^^^-^-^^—^^^^^..^^^ Accuracy—.^—^————^^^—————^——————Parameters measured.

Additional information {for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s).

Instrument(s) ——(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy—————————^——^——(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used __^_^__^_^____^________^___^^^—__

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________i—Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples.

Type of Sample.(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight———————

Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled.

Horizon Development.

Sample Depth-———.

Terrain——————-—

Drainage Development———————————

Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per centp.p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others____________________________

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -————^-^.-

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Reagents Used

.tests)

tests^^

.tests)

General. General.

Initial Check

Assessed

Approved Reports of Work sent out

Notice of Intent filed

Approval after Notice of Intent sent out

Duplicate sent to Resident Geologist

Duplicate sent to A.F.R.O.

Intermediate to Felsic Intrusive Rocks Pyrrhotite

Gossan(a) g ranodiorite(b) diorite/trondhiemite

B. BOOS CLAIMSFelsic I ntrusive R ocks

Strike and dip of foliation

Strike and dip of "second 1 foliation

Rock outcrop, small

Area of outcrop

TB ' TB 6l397d 613972(a) quartz ( >} - feldspar porphyry

(b) feldspar (:*) -quartz porphyry

Volcanic-Sedimentary Rocks

(c) greywacke(d) tuffaceous shale or siltstone(f) sericite and quartz-predominant in matrix(g) feldspar conspicuous in matrix (h) chlorite and/or biotite-rich matrixi) garnetiferousj) siltstone

(k) thinly bedded to laminated(l ) chloritic(r) rusty; sulphide bearing

Geological contact, approximate

Rock sample l ocation

Steep s lope

Swamp

Pit

Frost heave

large grancdioriticgentle S. slope

-Ofoo B.L. (e) banded g raphitic chert(k) rusty or ferruginous c herty rocks

balsam, poplar S birch cover LOCATION MAPlow, wet c

MOLSON LAKE AREA CLAIM MAP NO.G603

Felsic Volcanic Rocks

(a) massive(e) tuff(II) thinly bedded to laminated(S) silicified

cedar 6* sloping groundbirch c

LOW Intermediate Volcanic Rocks

large granodiorite Mafic Volcanic Rocksboulders

(a) massive(e) tuff(II) t hinly bedded to laminated

spruce S poplaro+OQ B.L

613971

lUMno outcropLOW

OWHK6Hrge g ronoauon

bouldersN. slope

low, flat ground

low, flat a round

fo moderate.*-"*l 5 c,f f k 7/af groundS.SE. slope towards pondl 5 -l07opo4

spruce 6 b alsam cover'cedar S sprucebalsam

ML 'DUM T. B. 613972granodiorite \ HIGHMEDIUMboulders

la.ejlor

5h.uklow, flat ground

5 c,f,k,l,r B.F-6 alder fi spruce

coverlow, flat \round

3970T. B. 6

o ge/M/y \ c—-MEDIUM

--T 5ffg,h(q.v.)

x 5j,k,l,rO-27ov.f.g.po)

x 51,r \

51 X If t. 60

MEDIUM

MEDIUM\

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITEDINDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY

PLAN MAP

SEEMAR MINES LIMITEDB.BOOS CLAIM GROUPEXTENT OF I.R. SURVEY

THUNDER BAY M.D. ONTARIO REVISED ' M.W.R.

DATE ' MAR. 1984

APPROVED:

SURFACE PROJECTION OF ANOMALOUS ZONE - ZONES OF EQUAL RESISTIVITY IN BEDROCK

HIGH 5000 - 10,000 ii-m.

MEDIUM 1 000 - 5000 ii - m.

LOW < 1000 li-m.

DEFINITEPROBABLE 1 1111111111 POSSIBLE ^w^-v V

NUMBER AT END OF ANOMALIES INDICATES SPREAD USED.

MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.- ANOMALOUS I.P. ZONE

42C12NWe?7l 2.6S9* MOLSON LAKE 200 DWG. NO.-IP.R-4M5f