ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · web viewto incorporate the...

50
SA Agility/Jumping Rule Proposals for Jan 2021 implementation SA Proposed Motion 1: SA would like to propose that the following general motion to rewrite the entire rule book with same language and syntax to make all rules cohesive and simpler to read and understand. This motion does not mean changing the meanings of each rule, more so to simplify the presentation, numbering, language, and use of definitions etc. Obviously once we have a draft rule book un-edited we would then compile a new document that covers off on all the existing and newly adopted proposals and does so in a way that meets the above objectives. We could then via a teleconference pass the complete book/document prior to presentation to the ANKC conference for final ok by them, this would allow each state to approve the modifications. If we are clever we can do it all by email and thereby trial that process for future rules reviews, speeding up these also. Rationale: Pretty self explanatory, over many rules reviews over past 20 or more years we have adopted many new rules that have been drafted by different writers from each state, thereby leading to a change in the style of language and the clarity issues between different aspects of the rules. It is time we brought the whole rule book back into a more cohesive and structured document. Numbering systems and presentation changes throughout, and is most obvious in the more recent rules reviews due to the large changes we have adopted. SA Proposed Motion 2: SA would also like to propose that we create a single document (Agility Rules) that includes all aspects of our

Upload: others

Post on 22-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

SA Agility/Jumping Rule Proposals for Jan 2021 implementation

SA Proposed Motion 1:

SA would like to propose that the following general motion to rewrite the entire rule book with same language and syntax to make all rules cohesive and simpler to read and understand. This motion does not mean changing the meanings of each rule, more so to simplify the presentation, numbering, language, and use of definitions etc.

Obviously once we have a draft rule book un-edited we would then compile a new document that covers off on all the existing and newly adopted proposals and does so in a way that meets the above objectives. We could then via a teleconference pass the complete book/document prior to presentation to the ANKC conference for final ok by them, this would allow each state to approve the modifications. If we are clever we can do it all by email and thereby trial that process for future rules reviews, speeding up these also.

Rationale:

Pretty self explanatory, over many rules reviews over past 20 or more years we have adopted many new rules that have been drafted by different writers from each state, thereby leading to a change in the style of language and the clarity issues between different aspects of the rules. It is time we brought the whole rule book back into a more cohesive and structured document. Numbering systems and presentation changes throughout, and is most obvious in the more recent rules reviews due to the large changes we have adopted.

SA Proposed Motion 2:

SA would also like to propose that we create a single document (Agility Rules) that includes all aspects of our sport in one place. Agility, Jumping, Games, Guides to judges, National teams event rules, Code of conduct for all participants, Judges Rules, Judges Training, etc. (although this could be a separate code that encompasses all disciplines. This would need some discussion by us all, but would leave a legacy for improved rules reviews and if structured well won’t require future major rewrites. The use of a living Page numbering system could allow for additional pages to be added in anywhere as required. Without renumbering of all pages, is just one thing that springs to mind. That way if we want to add other whole classes or equipment it could be achieved very simply. Or if a new sweepstakes competition was thought of it could be added very simply. This could go hand in hand with our first motion above.

Page 2: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

SA Proposed Motion 3:

SA would like to point out there is an inconsistency in the rules between Strategic pairs and any other form of Agility/Games where the Strategic pairs rule 4.4.7 which states that once a contact obstacle has been started, the dog should complete the obstacle or be disqualified for unsafe performance. This is obviously not consistent with other games or Agility.

This needs discussing to remove the inconsistency. Is it unsafe only in strat pairs?

SA Proposed rule changes:

Current Rule:

1.5 Moratorium on rule changes

Maintain the moratorium at five years for equipment changes except in extenuating circumstances. The National Agility Committee may review and change the rules every two years.

SA Proposed Changes:

1.5 Moratorium on rule changes

Maintain the moratorium at four years for equipment changes except in extenuating circumstances. The National Agility Committee may review and change the rules every year but must offer a consultative review process at a minimum every two years.

The 12 month review is limited to significant and/or safety matters and is decided upon by the National Agility Committee and submitted for ratification to the ANKC October Conference for final approval.

Any proposal that is lost at a rules review cannot be re-submitted until at least 18 months later.

Rationale:

Between the last rule change Jan 2016 and this latest rule change Jan 2021 the Rules review committee did meet and “review” and “changed” the rules for implementation Jan 2018 however this was a “housekeeping” review not a consultative review and meant that issues many agility enthusiast had ready to raise and try to overcome were not even considered. Also having a five year equipment moratorium means that in reality we have the ability to have a 2 year review and then a 3 year review. Agility is changing at a rapid pace and waiting for between 2-5 years to make changes in not reactive enough. We need to consider a more streamlined process as to how we make suggestions and have those suggestions considered in a more timely manner so that annual changes are realistic. The

Page 3: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

methodology currently employed to conduct rules reviews will need to be fully overhauled to enable such a change to occur.

Current Rule: first sentence

3.0 AGILITY TRIALS

Agility Trials are open to dogs registered with the Canine Control of either sex and 18 months of age or over.

SA Proposed Changes: to first sentence only minimum age requirement

3.0 AGILITY TRIALS

Agility Trials are open to dogs registered with the Canine Control of either sex and 18 months 2 years of age or over.

Rationale:

Whilst it can be said that the smaller breeds might have stabilised joints and growth plates it is a well known fact that the mid size to larger breeds are still developing their limbs and growth plates etc. By having an eighteen month old start of trialling it is obvious that these dogs are training at very young ages and the repetitive effect of early training can anecdotely be shown to cause more soft tissue and joint problems. Whilst we can do little to stop early training we can certainly remove the pressure to do so by raising the age of commencement. Also ties in with the height measuring happening at 2 years of age also. Rule 4.3 will need to be modified to reflect the change and remove the need to measure and then remeasure.

Current Rule:

3.0 AGILITY TRIALS

Agility Trials are open to dogs registered with the Canine Control of either sex and 18 months of age or over. The scheduling of an event or events and classes shall be subject to approval of the Canine Control. Events are Agility, Jumping, Games and any other activity that the ANKC Ltd determines. The following Games are approved: Snooker, Gamblers and Strategic Pairs. The affiliate must schedule Master, Excellent and Novice at an event. The Open class is optional. All scheduled classes will be conducted with one round only. All references to Agility to include Jumping and other Events.

Page 4: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

SA Proposed Changes: to fifth sentence only addition of Elite Class

3.0 Agility Trials are open to dogs registered with the Canine Control of either sex and 18 months of age or over. The scheduling of an event or events and classes shall be subject to approval of the Canine Control. Events are Agility, Jumping, Games and any other activity that the ANKC Ltd determines. The following Games are approved: Snooker, Gamblers and Strategic Pairs. The affiliate must schedule Elite, Master, Excellent and Novice at an event. The Open class is optional. All scheduled classes will be conducted with one round only. All references to Agility to include Jumping and other Events.

Rationale:

The level of training and handling has significantly improved over the years and the skills being trained are flowing through from the world stage.

Not all participants of this sport want to train to this standard but are still looking to trial and have some success. However some are looking for this challenge and for the sport to continue to maintain some standard within the world setting.

It has become clear over recent years that there is a significant difference in the standard of dogs competing in Masters and also the standard of courses being presented by Judges.

Unfortunately because Masters is the catchall class it makes it extremely difficult to support both groups.

By introducing an Elite class this could provide the separation needed to support the differing requirements.

Masters Class would be limited to a maximum number of challenges, not the current guideline of not less than 7, however those challenges still need to be of a masters standard with perhaps more complex handling manoeuvres limited also.

The Elite class would be a higher minimum number of challenges than Masters but more complex handling and discriminations.

Masters still stays open to all but you have to have your Masters title before you can enter the Elite class.

Current Rule:

3.1 Classes

Classes are defined as Novice, Excellent, Master and Open and any other class that the ANKC Ltd determines. Qualifications up to and including the date of closing of entry, shall count as eligibility to compete in any Class. At the discretion of the Trial

Page 5: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Secretary, a competitor who completes the necessary passes to a title and has applied for that title, after the closing of entry, may request and be transferred to the next higher class.

The following Class description applies to Agility, Jumping and Games

(a) NOVICE CLASS: For dogs that are not eligible for the Novice title.

(b) EXCELLENT CLASS: For dogs that have qualified and applied for the Novice title and are not eligible for the Excellent title.

(c) MASTER CLASS: For dogs that have qualified and applied for the Excellent title or Master title.

(d) OPEN CLASS: Open to all dogs. (Note: There is no Open class in Games.)

SA Proposed Changes: In first sentence and new item d) below

3.1 Classes are defined as Novice, Excellent, Master, Elite and Open and any other class that the ANKC Ltd determines. Qualifications up to and including the date of closing of entry, shall count as eligibility to compete in any Class. At the discretion of the Trial Secretary, a competitor who completes the necessary passes to a title and has applied for that title, after the closing of entry, may request and be transferred to the next higher class.

The following Class description applies to Agility, Jumping and Games

a) NOVICE CLASS: For dogs that are not eligible for the Novice title. b) EXCELLENT CLASS: For dogs that have qualified and applied for the Novice

title and are not eligible for the Excellent title. c) MASTER CLASS: For dogs that have qualified and applied for the Excellent title

or Master title.d) ELITE CLASS: For dogs that have qualified and applied for the Master title or

Elite Title. (Note: There is no Elite class in Games.)e) OPEN CLASS: Open to all dogs. (Note: There is no Open class in Games.)

Rationale:

Changes required to introduce Elite Class, (Note the brackets that dont allow for elite to be a class in Games as per Open Class rule.

Page 6: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Current Rule:

3.2.2 The Canine Control will receive application for the use of the relevant title letters after the name of each dog, when the dog has gained a qualification certificate at the following specified number of Trials under the specified number of Judges.

Class NOVICE EXCELLENT MASTER OPEN

Title AD/JD ADX/JDX ADM/JDM ADO/JDO

Number of Certificates

3 5 7 5

Number of Judges

2 2 3 3

Multiplier suffixes for ADM/JDM may be awarded for multiples of seven certificates gained e.g. 21 ADM qualifications is equal to ADM 3.

Multiplier suffixes for ADO/JDO may be awarded for multiples of five certificates gained e.g. 15 ADO qualifications is equal to ADO 3.

Multiplier suffixes only apply to certificates awarded after 1 st July 2006.

SA Proposed Changes: addition of Elite class qualification and title

3.2.2 The Canine Control will receive application for the use of the relevant title letters after the name of each dog, when the dog has gained a qualification certificate at the following specified number of Trials under the specified number of Judges.

Class NOVICE EXCELLENT MASTER ELITE OPEN

Title AD/JD ADX/JDX ADM/JDM ADE/JDE ADO/JDO

Number of Certificates

3 5 7 10 5

Number of Judges

2 2 3 4 3

Page 7: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Multiplier suffixes for ADE/JDE may be awarded for multiples of Ten certificates gained e.g. 30 ADE qualifications is equal to ADE 3.

Multiplier suffixes for ADM/JDM may be awarded for multiples of seven certificates gained e.g. 21 ADM qualifications is equal to ADM 3.

Multiplier suffixes for ADO/JDO may be awarded for multiples of five certificates gained e.g. 15 ADO qualifications is equal to ADO 3.

Multiplier suffixes only apply to certificates awarded after 1 st July 2006.

Rationale:

Housekeeping to allow for introduction of Elite class with 10 qualifications to attain title as we are now at the pinnacle of the sport it should be graduated harder and withmore challenges also. Had considered a win out scenarioto qualify but thought it unlikely to get support.

Current Rule:

3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st July 2011)

A dog will be eligible for the title of Agility Champion 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 when they have attained 1000 points, these can only be gathered at the completion of the Masters title in each category of which 100 points from Agility and 100 points from Jumping must be after 1st July 2011.

Agility – after completion of their ADM title – earn 500 points. Points are awarded as follows: 1st place Qualifying score = 25 points 2nd Place Qualifying score = 20 points 3rd Place Qualifying score = 15 points Qualifying score only = 10 points

Jumping - after completion of their JDM title – earn 500 points. Points are awarded as follows: 1st place Qualifying score = 25 points 2nd Place Qualifying score = 20 points 3rd Place Qualifying score = 15 points Qualifying score only = 10 points

Where classes are not scheduled in separate height categories points will be awarded as if they were. All qualifications earned before 1 st July 2011 shall count as qualification score10 points only.

Dogs may continue to accumulate places under the Agility Championship rules (2006) up to and including 31/12/2011 and will be entitled to apply for an Ag Ch

If an existing Ag Ch is to apply for an Ag Ch height category, this will supersede the existing title.

Page 8: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

The prefix to be used will be AG CH. 200, AG CH. 300, AG CH.400, AG CH.500, and AG CH.600

SA Proposed Changes: to incorporate the Elite class into the championship

3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

A dog will be eligible for the title of Agility Champion 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 when they have attained 1000 points, these can be gathered after the Master title has been applied for and granted and by competing in either the Masters or the Elite class in each category of which 100 points from Agility and 100 points from Jumping must be after 1st January 2021.

Agility earn 500 points competing within the Masters or Elite Classes. Points are awarded as follows:

# Dogs competing in Height Category

Points

Competing in Masters Classes

1st 2nd 3rd Qualification

20 or more 20 15 10 5

15 to 20 15 10 5 5

10 to 15 10 5 5 5

Less than 10 5 5 5 5

Competing in Elite Class

20 or more 40 30 20 10

15 to 20 30 20 10 10

10 to 15 20 10 10 10

Less than 10 10 10 10 10

Page 9: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Jumping earn 500 points competing within the Masters or Elite Classes. Points are awarded as follows:

# Dogs competing in Height Category

Points

Competing in Masters Classes

1st 2nd 3rd Qualification

20 or more 20 15 10 5

15 to 20 15 10 5 5

10 to 15 10 5 5 5

Less than 10 5 5 5 5

Competing in Elite Class

20 or more 40 30 20 10

15 to 20 30 20 10 10

10 to 15 20 10 10 10

Less than 10 10 10 10 10

Where classes are not scheduled in separate height categories points will be awarded as if they were.

Page 10: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Where classes are not scheduled in separate height categories the overall place getters will earn top up points to achieve maximum AGCH points as follows:

# Dogs competing in Height Category

Points

Competing in Masters Classes

1st 2nd 3rd

Top up / Max Top up / Max Top up / Max

20 or more 0 / 20 0 / 15 0 / 10

15 to 20 5 / 20 5 / 15 5 / 10

10 to 15 10 / 20 10 / 15 5 / 10

Less than 10 15 / 20 10 / 15 5 / 10

Competing in Elite Class

20 or more 0 / 40 0 / 30 0 / 20

15 to 20 10 / 40 10 / 30 10 / 20

10 to 15 20 / 40 20 / 30 10 / 20

Less than 10 30 / 40 20 / 30 10 / 20

All qualifications earned before 1st July 2011 shall count as qualification score 10 points only. All qualifications earned after 1 st January 2011 but before 1 st January 2021 shall count under the criteria of the previous rule.

If an existing Ag Ch is to apply for an Ag Ch height category, this will supersede the existing title.

The prefix to be used will be AG CH. 200, AG CH. 300, AG CH.400, AG CH.500, and AG CH.600

Rationale:

Required changes if implementing an Elite class.

Remove of old AGCH sentence as it is now obsolete.

Setting a tiered scale of points to ensure that all dogs are treated fairly under the point earning system. From experience it is considerably easier for all height categories other

Page 11: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

than the 500 height category (except for those few dogs at the top of the 500 category) to achieve the AGCH points. The other issue that arises is where a dog that is competing in a small entry height class but actually wins the overall competition they are then not receiving the points they deserve.

NEED TO ADD POSSIBLE GRAND CHAMPION CRITERIA AFTER ELITE TITLE AND AGCH. ( For next Rules Review after Elite class has bedded in)

3.2.4 AGILITY/JUMPING GRAND CHAMPION – 1000 POINTS FROM ELITE/Masters CLASSES maybe including games ??

A Grand Champ title – AG GR CH

COMPETITORS WOULD LIKE AN EXTRA MORE CHALLENGING CLASS – MANY MASTERS DOGS COULD BE AN AG CH 10 TIMES OVER – THIS SHOULD BE REWARDED

Current Rule:

3.3.4 Photographic Review

Photographic review of the dog running courses will not be accepted.

SA Proposed Rule:

Photographic review of the dog running courses will not be accepted. Permission must be sought from the Judge prior to posting to social media.

Rationale:

With the prevalence of the filming of dogs running it only seems fair to allow the judge to decide if this should occur.

Current Rule:

3.4 Rings

3.4.1 The Ring shall be a minimum of 800 square metres except with the approval of the Canine Control. Each ring will have separate entry and exit points with a minimum of a three (3) metres corridor between the rings where practicable.

Page 12: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

SA Proposed Rule:

3.4 Rings

3.4.1 a) The Agility Ring shall be a minimum of 800 square metres 35 x 30 metres except with the approval of the Canine Control.

b) The Jumping Ring shall be a minimum of 30 x 25 metres except with the approval of the Canine Control.

Each ring will have separate entry and exit points with a minimum of a three (3) metres corridor between the rings where practicable.

Rationale:

Small rings that are square do not allow enough space to adequately allow for diverse course design incorporating straight approaches to the dog walk whilst also attempting to nest four level appropriate courses with addition of Elite class we may need to look at bigger rings, these sizes are minimum suggested sizes, it would be best for judges and trial management to confer on what sizes are available or required.

Current Rule:

4.3 Height Card

Prior to a dog competing in a trial, an Official Height Card, signed by TWO (ANKC Ltd) Agility Judges or other persons approved by the Canine Control specifying the height or the height category of the dog must be obtained. The height of the dog is to be measured at the highest point of the withers no more than two months before that trial. The Height Card is valid for the life of the dog if they are over 2 years old or the dog is measured at the 600 Height Category. If the dog is under 2 years old a temporary height card will be issued and the dog will be required to be remeasured when the dog is 2 years of age. A permanent Height Card would then be issued. Any pass cards issued to the dog during the period of the temporary height card will remain valid.

SA Proposed Rule: tied to the raising of min age to compete

4.3 Height CardPrior to a dog competing in a trial for the first time, an Official Height Card, signed by TWO (ANKC Ltd) Agility Judges or other persons approved by the Canine Control specifying the height or the height category of the dog must be obtained. The height of the dog is to be measured at the highest point of the withers no more than two months before that first trial unless the dog has already reached the age of two (2) years. The Height Card is valid for the life of the dog. if they are over 2 years old or the dog is measured at the 600 Height Category. If the dog is under 2 years old a temporary height card will be issued and

Page 13: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

the dog will be required to be remeasured when the dog is 2 years of age. A permanent Height Card would then be issued.Any pass cards issued to the dog during the period of the temporary height card will remain valid.

Rationale:

In line with our proposal to raise the age at which a dog can compete to 2 years of age, we also see the need to simplify the measure rule to accommodate that change. Saves having to remeasure the dog also under the existing remeasure rule and means that a dog only needs to front that first time. Saves additional resources being employed for dog measuring. If min. age requirementstays same SA will be withdrawing the above proposal.

Current Rule:

5.4 Touching/Moving

“No equipment can be touched or moved by the Handler to assist the dog whilst negotiating the course.”

SA Proposed Rule:

Delete rule 5.4.

Rationale:

The same topic is dealt with in rule 9.16h “A dog will be disqualified if the Handler touches the equipment to assist the dog...” Rule 9.16h is a better expression of the rule as it includes the penalty for the offence. Duplication.

Current Rule:

6.5 Hurdles

The uprights, which may be winged, are to be a minimum of 1000 mm high.

SA Proposed Rule: to change the specific sentence to read with addition

The uprights, which may be winged, are to be a minimum of 1000 mm and a maximum of 1200 mm high.

Rationale:

At present the rules do not set a maximum height for the jump uprights. The proposed maximum of 1200 mm matches what is set for the weaving poles.

Page 14: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Current Rule:

Excerpt from 6.5 Hurdles

“Bars are to be made of any material that is unlikely to injure if they are displaced.”

Proposed Changes:

Excerpt from 6.5 Hurdles

Expand sentence to read “Bars are to be made of any material that is unlikely to injure the dog if they are displaced and to weigh no more than ??? grams .”

(We would like other states to have some input into this weight as our aim is not to disenfranchise any particular bar weights. We do believe that some bars are too weighty, especially for those smaller dogs. We also understand that wind and such make it easier to accept heavier bars. If other states want to put up some suggestions, but our thoughts are around the 450grams to 550 grams. Bearing in mind the size and weight of our smaller competing dogs. We are not locked in, and are doing further research to work out what might be the best solution.)

Rationale:

Previously most jump bars were hollow, and not heavy. With the advent of wing jumps, many bars now have caps at both ends and are filled with material. Some of these bars are noticeably heavy. Given that dogs weighing as little as 3 kg compete in agility, it is timely to set a maximum weight for the bars.

Current Rule:

7 HANDLER REQUIREMENTS

7.2.1 On the Steward's call of the dog's catalogue number, the Handler will enter the ring via the entry point, with the dog on lead and follow the Steward's and/or Judge's instructions. The lead and harness or head collar must be removed, the collar may be removed and all items handed to a Steward.

SA Proposed Changes: addition of sentence on end

7.2.1 On the Steward's call of the dog's catalogue number, the Handler will enter the ring via the entry point, with the dog on lead and follow the Steward's and/or Judge's instructions. The lead and harness or head collar must be removed, the collar may be removed and all items handed to a Steward.

At no time whilst in the ring is the handler permitted to use the lead or other items as a toy, penalty of up to a disqualification may be applied.

Page 15: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Rationale:

The current leads that are used in the ring by handlers look like tug toys and often are used as such. It has been a grey area for some time and this addition to the rule will clearly identify any behaviour that involves the use of a Toy within the ring and provide for a penalty up to a disqualification should the judge deem it necessary.

Current Rule:

7.5 Misbehaviour

If before, during or after the test, the dog or Handler is guilty of any breach of the Rules, or other misbehaviour, a minimum penalty of five faults and up to disqualification shall be incurred.

A competitor shall not be penalised by spectator participation.

SA Proposed Changes: Addition of paragraph at end of current rule

7.5 Misbehaviour

If before, during or after the test, the dog or Handler is guilty of any breach of the Rules, or other misbehaviour, a minimum penalty of five faults and up to disqualification shall be incurred.

A competitor shall not be penalised by spectator participation, unless it clearly is for the deliberate advantage or disadvantage of the competing dog. Penalties of up to disqualification may be applied. The Judge will be required to place any use of this rule in the reports to the Canine Control along with any evidence or witness statements.

Rationale:

The competitive nature of our sport has meant that there is increasing evidence of deliberate use of measures to try to influence the competing dog. This can be to advantage or disadvantage. Examples include luring behaviours with toys and food at finish run and even the deliberate release of dogs into the ring environment during a run thereby causing a re-run or possible reduction in the performance of a competing dog, this can obviously be used in the reverse as long as dog is still qualifying. Obviously a Judge will need to be very clear of the intent and evidence that might lead to a sanction.

Current Rule:

8 JUDGING PROCEDURES

8.1.2 Judges may split the number of Handlers, to eliminate large numbers on course inspection.

Page 16: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

SA Proposed Changes:

8.1.2 Prior to the commencement of a Trial the Trial Manager/Secretary may split classes to eliminate large numbers on course inspection and publish this in the Trial Catalogue. Judges may also split the number of Handlers, to eliminate large numbers on course inspection as they see fit, this may be further splitting of course inspection or if the Trial Manager/Secretary has not done so prior to the commencement of the Trial.

Rationale:

The larger trials often have the cut offs for course walking already determined by the Trial Managers /Secretaries and marked clearly in catalogues. This rule aims to ensure that this process is locked down and can’t be overruled by judges unless they are further reducing numbers on the course walks. It also gives the trial organising committee an equal say in the process whilst still allowing Judges to make the call if it hadn’t been done already.

Current Rule:

8.2 Unusual circumstances

“If an unusual circumstance occurs which in the opinion of the Judge disadvantages the dog, the Judge may allow the dog to be rerun.”

SA Proposed Changes : involves first part of sentence

Expand the first sentence to read “If an unusual circumstance occurs which in the opinion of the Judge disadvantages the dog, the Judge may allow the dog to be re-run, only if the dog was still qualifying before the unusual circumstance occurred.”

Rationale:

The second part of existing rule 8.2, to do with all time devices failing, explains that the dog only gets a rerun if it would have gone clear (which is fair, given that the dog has completed its run). The first part of existing rule 8.2 is silent on whether to allow a rerun if the dog had faulted or been disqualified prior to the unusual circumstance.

Current Rule:

8.2 Unusual Circumstances

If an unusual circumstance occurs which in the opinion of the Judge disadvantages the dog, the Judge may allow the dog to be rerun. If all timing devices fail, the handler should be given the option of a re‐run (providing the dog would have had a clear round except for

Page 17: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

timing failure). The re-run totally supercedes the original run and no aspect of the original run is to be retained.

SA Proposed Rule: involves addition of another option if timing fails

8.2 Unusual Circumstances

If an unusual circumstance occurs which in the opinion of the Judge disadvantages the dog, the Judge may allow the dog to be rerun.

If all timing devices fail, the handler should be given the option of a re‐run (providing the dog would have had a clear round except for timing failure). The re-run totally supercedes the original run and no aspect of the original run is to be retained.

Or;

The Judge may offer the handler the option of a clear round (Qualification) at the standard course time, but only if the dog would have made that time in the opinion of the judge.

Rationale:

This allows for less stress and time wasted, and also gives the judge an option to add no further stress to the dog and handler some dogs are one run wonders and this just provides an alternate solution.

Current Rule

8.14 Stewards

“Last Paragraph”

Timekeepers and Scribes are not to own or have an interest in any dog competing in the class for which they are stewarding.

SA Proposed Changes:

Delete whole Paragraph

Timekeepers and Scribes are not to own or have an interest in any dog competing in the class for which they are stewarding

Rationale:

It is getting harder to find Stewards and scribes and partners, husbands, and wives should be encouraged to help if possible. The judge can still check results to ensure no cheating occurs.

Page 18: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Current Rule:

9.6 Distance between obstacles

The straight line distance between the end of one obstacle to the start of the next obstacle

measured from the centre of the exiting face to the centre of leading face of the next obstacle is to be a minimum of four (4) metres to a maximum of eight (8) metres.

Except that subject to rule 9.3 the distance between the end of a contact obstacle and the

entry to a flexible tunnel under that contact may be less than 4 metres when the direction of

the course is from the contact to the tunnel.

Where individual height categories are scheduled then the minimum and maximum distance

between obstacles are as follows;

HEIGHT CAT MINIMUM MAXIMUM

200mm 2 metres 8 metres

300mm 3 metres 8 metres

400mm 4 metres 8 metres

500mm 4 metres 8 metres

600mm 4 metres 8 metres

SA Proposed Rule:

9.6 Distance between obstacles

The straight line distance between the end of one obstacle to the start of the next obstacle measured from the centre of the exiting face to the centre of leading face of the next obstacle is to be a minimum of five (5) metres up to a maximum of Eight (8) ten (10) metres.

Except that subject to rule 9.3 the distance between the end of a contact obstacle and the entry to a flexible tunnel under that contact may be less than 5 metres when the direction of the course is from the contact to the tunnel.

*(Where obstacle spacing that falls between 8 and 10 metres on a course is used, they can only be negotiated by the dog on a total of up to two occasions. This means one specific spacing twice or two specific spacings once each.)

Page 19: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Where individual height categories are scheduled then the minimum and maximum distance between obstacles are as follows;

HEIGHT CAT MINIMUM MAXIMUM

200mm 2 4 metres 8 metres

300mm 3 4 metres 8 metres

400mm 4 5 metres 8 metres

500mm 4 5 metres 8 10 metres *(8-10metre twice only)

600mm 4 5 metres 8 10 metres *(8-10metre twice only)

Rationale:

Handlers still need the ability to manoeuvre around a course and while the dog may be smaller the handler is not. Courses using the previous minimum spacings basically stopped the handler from being able to move as each obstacle could be placed so close to the previous one that movement was impossible. For dogs that require the handler to be in motion this was extremely unfair.

For fast mid size to large dogs 4 metre spacing on a straight line can actually be dangerous and force dogs into hyperextension to clear the jump. In fact 5 metres is still tight for the 600 dogs or very long striding 500 dogs however application of this rule also relies on judges understanding stride and spacing and setting tighter spacing only in appropriate places on course. We do believe however 5 metres is the absolute minimum even when setting a 180 degree design.

Judges also have ability to use the additional distance given up to 10 metres up to 2 times (dog negotiation) to make it possible to increase distance for specific challenges, whilst not increasing every distance to 10 metres and creating too longer courses.

Page 20: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Current Rule:

9.15 Refusal of an obstacle

It is the Judge's decision as to when a refusal to take an obstacle has occurred the obstacle must be re-attempted.

A refusal should be indicated when:

a) the dog fails to make an attempt at an obstacleb) Approaching an obstacle turns away or stops in front of the obstacle it should be

negotiating.c) Attempting the Broad Jump a dog does not enter between the two (2) front poles or

does not attempt to jump the boards.d) Attempting the Dog Walk a dog fails to ascend the up ramp or comes off the obstacle

before reaching the horizontal section.e) Attempting the Hurdles a dog fails to pass between the two uprights.f) Attempting the Scramble a dog fails to ascend the up ramp or comes off the obstacle

before the apex.g) Attempting the Seesaw a dog fails to ascend the plank or comes off the obstacle

before the pivot point.h) Attempting the Weaving Poles a dog runs past the first pole to the left of the

Weaving Poles or past the second pole to the right of the Weaving Poles

SA Proposed Rule Change:

9.15 Refusal of an obstacle

It is the Judge's decision as to when a refusal to take an obstacle has occurred the obstacle must be re-attempted.

A refusal should be indicated when:

a) the dog fails to make an attempt at an obstacleb) Approaching an obstacle turns away or stops in front of the obstacle it should be

negotiating.c) Attempting the Broad Jump a dog does not enter between the two (2) front poles or

does not attempt to jump the boards.d) Attempting the Dog Walk a dog fails to ascend the up ramp or comes off the obstacle

before reaching the horizontal section.e) Attempting the Hurdles a dog fails to pass between the two uprights.f) Attempting the Scramble a dog fails to ascend the up ramp or comes off the obstacle

before the apex.

Page 21: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

g) Attempting the Seesaw a dog fails to ascend the plank or comes off the obstacle before the pivot point.

h) Attempting the Weaving Poles a dog runs past the first pole to the left of the Weaving Poles or past the second pole to the right of the Weaving Poles.

Whole section to be added in after this opening summary of the refusals detailing how the judge will make their decisions. Rule of Thirds to be incorporated here. See separate document as attached. Will need to modify to suit our rules language etc. Also review diagrams and redraw to suit our take on the rules happy to do this.

9.15.1 Refusal Guidelines:

A refusal is defined as

□ Significant hesitation in front of an obstacle

□ Turning back from an obstacle after beginning an approach towards it

□ Running past the obstacle to be performed

□ Improperly performing an obstacle as described in the “Obstacle

Performance Standards.”

The refusal line shall be defined as the front plane of an obstacle.

The refusal line only becomes active when the judge deems that the dog has started to approach the obstacle. A refusal cannot be called until the dog is on the take-off side of a jump. (Will need to make a call on this one)Dogs are subject to refusals until they are completely on or in an obstacle with all four feet. So, a dog that enters the tunnel, steps onto a contact, or enters the weave poles and then stops with fewer than four paws on or in the obstacle is subject to a refusal call. Once on a contact (or in a tunnel) with all four feet, the dog may stop, spin in circles, or reverse direction without penalty; as long as the dog exits the obstacle correctly. If, however, the dog dismounts the obstacle (e.g., jumps off a contact or backs out of a tunnel, he will be given a refusal fault and is then subject to refusals on the re-approach to the obstacle.

Page 22: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

The refusal llne does not become active untll the dog has turned and started to approach the obstacle.

®I©- -T

®!/

No RefusalRefusal

Dog began approach to #3 and

0rm

0 -rm rm

®

No RefusalRefusal

Dog began approach to #3 and

Page 23: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

,

a a a

a►.............

I

Refusal

Significant deviation in final third. Dog cannot tum on its path once in

commitment area of obstacle.

Refusal

Dog turned away from approach; he could have

continued on the dashed line

Refusal

Deviation and spin in final

a a a

- ◄a

I

Refusal

10.1.1 REFUSALS ON THE APPROACH TO CONTACT OBSTACLES

No Refusal

Contact is less than a 90 degree angle so there is no refusal for getting on the board above the

top line of the contact zone.

Dog approached contact at a 90 degree angle or greater and is past the top line of the up contact zone when he gets on the dogwalk.

INo Refusal

'

'

Page 24: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

9.15.2 REFUSAL LINE FOR WEAVE POLES

The weave pole refusal plane varies based on which side of the weaves the dog is approaching: “on-side” or “off-side.” The dog must make the entry by pole #2.

On-side entry refusal planes (shaded)

- : -

No Refusal Refusal Refusal

Off-side entry refusal planes (shaded)

.

- .\

No Refusal Refusal Refusal

Page 25: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

9.15.3 RULE OF THIRDS

To help judges determine when a spin, a hesitation, or a deviation off line is considered a refusal, we use the rule of thirds.

Visualize the path of the dog between 2 (two) obstacles and break it into 3 (three) sections:

9.15.3.1In the first one-third the dog is landing or leaving the prior obstacle and orienting toward the next obstacle. A refusal cannot be called in this section.

9.15.3.2In the second one-third, the middle ground between two obstacles, only a significant deviation off the dog’s line to the next obstacle can be called a refusal.

9.15.3.3In the final one-third, closest to the next obstacle and the final approach, any spin, hesitation, or deviation off line is a refusal. A significant hesitation is as long as it takes the judge to say the words, “significant hesitation.”

Rule of Thirds

Visualize the path of the dog between 2 obstacles and break it into 3 sections:

n the green: any spin, hesitation, or deviation off line = NO refusal

n the yellow: any spin, hesitation, or small deviation off line= NOrefusal n the yellow: a significant deviation off line= refusal

0

rm rm

0

rm

i0rm 0

iNo Refusal

Small deviation, dog looked and drifted toward handler

Refusal

Significant deviation, dog turned toward handler and moved

Page 26: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

9.15.4 EXAMPLES OF RULE OF THIRDS

No Refusal Refusal

Refusal No Refusal

@)® ®

t@No Refusal

Refusal

Dog deviates off path to #12 in last section and passes the edge of the jump wing.

®

Refusal No Refusal

Page 27: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

9.15.5 ADDITIONAL REFUSAL CLARIFICATIONS

rm rm

0

•0

0 0No Refusal Refusal

0

®I t 01

0- -Refusal

Dog went across plane when

t

0- -Refusal

Page 28: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

0 0

i

0Refusal

Dog deviated and went across plane

No Refusal

Dog was not on approach when he crossed plane

I

0No Refusal

-Refusal

Dog has gone past tunnel entrance and must tum back

to re-approach

-No Refusal

No Refusal

Dog has not gone past tunnel entrance is just swerving on approach

-

-Refusal

Dog has gone past tunnel entrance and must tum back

Page 29: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

9.15.6 BLIND TUNNEL ENTRY REFUSAL/POINT OF COMMITMENT CLARIFICATION

9.15.7 MISSED CONTACTS VERSUS REFUSALS

□ For the A-frame and Dogwalk: Leaving the obstacle prior to beginning descent of the down ramp— defined as the dog touching the down ramp with any portion of his body—shall constitute a refusal. If the dog touches the down ramp and then leaves before touching the contact point, it is a missed contact, not a refusal.

□ For the Seesaw: If the dog leaves the obstacle before the pivot point, a refusal will be incurred. Once the dog passes the pivot point with any portion of his body and then leaves before touching the contact point, it is a missed contact, not a refusal. Leaving the obstacle on descent with all four paws before the plank has reached the ground, constitutes a fly-off. If the dog is deemed to leave the plank before it reaches the ground, and misses the contact, this will only constitute one fault.

9.15.8 TUNNEL UNDER A CONTACT

Tunnel under the A-frame: If there is a tunnel positioned under the A-frame and the dog runs past the A- frame while attempting that obstacle, and he touches the tunnel with any part of his body or jumps over it while attempting to get on the A-frame, only a refusal fault will be given.

Once the dog is on the A-frame (either on the up ramp or the down ramp), if he jumps or falls off of the obstacle and subsequently touches or jumps over the tunnel, regardless of where the tunnel is positioned under the A-frame, only faults relating to the A-frame performance will be given.

If the dog goes under the A-frame while attempting a tunnel under the contact, it a refusal fault.

I

:x

I IRefusal

Significant deviation while on

INo Refusal

No tum back greater than 90

IRefusal

90 degree tum back after entering

Page 30: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Tunnel under the Dogwalk: If there is a tunnel positioned under the dogwalk and the dog runs past the dogwalk while attempting that obstacle, and he touches the tunnel with any part of his body or jumps over it while attempting to get on the dogwalk, only a refusal fault will be given.

Once the dog is on the dogwalk (either on the up ramp, middle ramp, or the down ramp), if he jumps or falls off of the obstacle and subsequently touches or jumps over the tunnel, regardless of where the tunnel is positioned under the dogwalk, only faults relating to the dogwalk performance will be given.

If the dog goes under the dogwalk while attempting a tunnel under the contact, it a refusal fault.

Page 31: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Rationale:

The refusal calling from judge to judge and from state to state across our country has never been consistent. We have tried over many rules reviews to get some sort of standardisation across all states and all judges. This methodology of Rule of Thirds offers a structured and simplistic approach to calling refusals. It is employed in almost every other country in the world and would be classed as worlds best practice in calling refusals.

It is an absolute no brainer, many judges already claim to use this method in Australia, but I bet that few up until recently had understood this very structured use of the rule to the extent that it is explained here.

At recent Global judges training programs held in Victoria and QLD the method got the overwhelming support of every judge who attended, some 40 odd judges. Including another 20+ in New Zealand.

Current Rule:

9.16 Disqualification

A dog will be disqualified if:

a. It accumulates three refusals.

b. It does not re-attempt a missed or refused obstacle.

c. It takes the wrong course.

d. It repeats any gap either missed or completed in the weaving poles.

e. It fouls while under the control of the judge.

f. In the Judges opinion, the dog is out of control.

g. The handler physically contacts the dog in a manner which assists it.

h. The Handler touches the equipment to assist the dog or deliberately alters the position of any equipment in the ring without the judge's consent.

i. Any Handler carries food or wears or carries aids (balls, bumbags, toys, dummies etc.)into the Ring.

j. Any Handler ducks under or jumps over any obstacle whilst negotiating the course.

Page 32: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

k. After the Judge has indicated that the handler may start and the handler has crossed the starting line, the handler returns across the starting line, unless a refusal has occurred.

l. It performs an obstacle in any manner in which the judge feels the dog has clearly endangered itself, the handler, or anyone else.

m. the handler fails to obey a judges order.

n. the handler physically assists the dog over the line at the start.

o. The handler steps on or over the distance handling line in the open class.

In the event that a dog is disqualified under items a, b, c, d, k, o the handler and dog will be permitted to complete the course.

SA Proposed Rule:

i. Any Handler carries food or wears or carries aids (balls, bumbags, toys, dummies etc.)into the Ring. (this rule will need to be changed to allow for NFC class even if we keep the status quo and don’t put it in our National Rules)

In the event that a dog is disqualified under items a, b, c, d, k, o the handler and dog will be permitted to complete the course. All other methods of disqualification listed above the handler and the dog must leave the ring immediately.

( Should this rule be accepted it should probably have the numbering/lettering of each DQ changed so the DQ’s that can complete course are listed first followed by those that must leave the ring immediately)

Rationale:

The current rule specifies the occasions where a competitor doesn’t have to leave the ring when disqualified but is silent on the remaining types of DQ which should be asked to leave the ring, this really is just housekeeping.

Page 33: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

Current Rule:

19 Ready Reference Guide

Table beneath

Proposed Rule:

Re-number this rule as;

20 Ready Reference Guide

Still with table beneath

Rationale:

To enable the inclusion of a new rule 19 as shown below.

Proposed Rule:

New rule;

19 NOT FOR COMPETITION

19.1 Explanation

Agility exhibitions (Competitions) are conducted for the purpose of testing the Handler and dog’s teamwork and ability to successfully complete the standard/challenges set by the Judge. However, at various times throughout a dog’s competition life a Handler may wish to train and/or reward their dog under Competition conditions. This rule recognises such a requirement and provides the ability for a Handler to enter a Competition as “Not For Competition” (NFC).

NOT FOR COMPETITION (NFC)

19.2 Purpose of NFC

A Competitor may participate in any NFC class, for which they meet the requirements, for the purpose of training / rewarding in the ring, practice and /or confidence building.

19.3 Classes Offered as NFC

Page 34: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

There are no separate classes, courses or judges for NFC classes. NFC runs will be undertaken on the relevant competition course. A NFC run replaces the dog’s competition run in that class.There are 3 different NFC classes:

a) Standard NFC – enter a class and height that under normal trial conditions the dog would be eligible to enter.

b) Lower Height / Lower Class NFC – enter either a class and/or a height that is less than the dog’s current competition standard. The exception to this is a dog whose competition height is 200, they must run at 200. For clarity, a dog cannot be entered in a class that it would not be ordinarily eligible for or at a jump height higher than its competition height.

c) Veterans – For dogs 8 years or over, who are not competing in any other class at that Trial. The dog must have gained a minimum of an Agility/Jumping/Games novice title. This class will only be held on a novice jumping course and the dog must compete at a jump height less than their competition jump height.

19.4 NFC Rules

All ANKC rules for a Competition apply to NFC with the exception of the following:

a) Under no circumstances may a Handler who runs NFC qualify or receive qualification certificates and there is no requirement for any prizes/ribbons/rosettes for that Class.

b) A Handler may decide on the day to change their entry to Standard NFC and may decide to do so right up until just before they step into the ring. It is the responsibility of the Handler to clearly indicate to the judge verbally and/or by using a Time-out signal (tip of the fingers of one hand touching the palm of the other hand), preferably both, they are participating as NFC and the Judge will confirm and signal back to the Handler and Scribe. The Scribe is to write NFC against the dog’s number on the Scribe’s sheet.

c) A Handler may not enter the ring for a competition round and then once in the ring change their mind and swap to NFC. That decision must be clearly

Page 35: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

indicated to the Judge before they start their round and/or before they undertake any training in the ring.

d) To enable the choice to officially compete or run Standard NFC the competitor must submit a normal competition entry as per the Trial Schedule and pay the full entry fee. Alternatively Standard NFC can be elected on the entry form and the entry fee will be as stated on the Trial Schedule. For clarity, if any NFC is declared on the entry form the competitor cannot elect, on the day, to do a competition run.

e) To enter Lower Height / Lower Class NFC the competitor must enter the trial as per the Schedule and declare on their entry:

i) The class they are enteringii) The jump height requirediii) The dogs official competition jump heightf) To enter Veterans NFC the competitor must enter the trial as per the

Schedule and declare on their entry:i) The class is Veteransii) The jump height requirediii) The dogs official competition jump heightg) A Competitor running NFC will only be given time in the ring up to the

SCT.h) Timing for NFC will start when the dog negotiates the first obstacle or if

the Handler triggers the timing device. In the case of manual timing the time will start when the first part of the dog’s body crosses the plane of the first obstacle attempted. The scribe should not record time or faults for an NFC round.

i) The Handler may choose to repeat an already completed obstacle or sequence of obstacles in a NFC round.

j) A Handler may not lift a dog onto equipment.k) The Scribe is to indicate to the Handler that their time is finished at the end

of the SCT for an NFC round. At this time the Handler should promptly remove their dog from the ring. At the end of the SCT the handler should promptly remove their dog from the ring. Failure to quickly exit the ring at SCT may result in the judge dismissing the competitor. Repeated dismissals will be reported to DogsSA.

l) Under no circumstances is food to be used in the ring. This includes toys with food inside of them.

Page 36: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)

m) The Handler may use a non-audible toy for rewarding in the ring which must remain in control of the Handler at all times (ie it must not be thrown or intentionally released) otherwise the competitor will be asked to leave the ring immediately.

n) The competitor may choose to carry a lead and/or collar during the run. o) The Judge shall not Judge the Competitor for Faults or Refusals but shall

ensure safety, good sportsmanship and fair treatment of the dog and that the Competitor is complying with these NFC rules whilst in the ring.

19.5 Trial Secretaries / Catalogues

Elected NFC Entries

The trial secretary will include the entry in the catalogue and allocate it a NFC number. The entry will be added the end of the required class / height nominated. If a separate height trial (different courses for different heights) is being conducted, regardless of the jump height selected by the competitor, the dog should be put in the catalogue in the course that has been designed for that dogs competition height. For example if a dog normally competes in the 500 class and have entered to do NFC at 400 the dog should still compete in the 500 course with the jump height set to 400. These NFC runs will be catalogued at the end of the height category within the class entered. This is to ensure the safety of the dog. A larger dog jumping lower heights does not change the length of stride of the dog therefore it is safer for these dogs to compete on courses that have been designed to take this into consideration.

Back up position was to amend the DQ Rule regarding toys in the ring for NFC. Regardless the DQ Rules still has to be amended even if the NFC Rules is accepted.

Page 37: ankc.org.auankc.org.au/media/9341/11-attachment-526-dogs-sa.d… · Web viewto incorporate the Elite class into the championship 3.2.3 Agility Champion (commencing 1st January 2021)