annexure 1 guideline framework for the compilation … · guideline framework for the compilation...

DRAFT

GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION

OF SURVEY REPORTS

TECHNICAL SURVEY REPORT 1. SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER 3. SURVEYED BY (Name of organisation that performed the survey) 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

4.1 Locality of the survey area 4.2 Terrain type description 4.3 Size of the survey 4.4 Date and duration of the survey 4.5 Surveyors involved (Names, qualifications and registration numbers).

5. EXECUTION OF THE SURVEY PROJECT

5.1 Instrumentation and equipment used 5.2 Special aids 5.3 Application of special techniques 5.4 Detail description of methodology applied

5.4.1 Horizontal fixing 5.4.2 Vertical fixing

5.4.3 DTM observations

5.4.4 Structural surveys

5.4.5 Add to this list any other surveys undertaken on the project

ANNEXURE 1

Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013

DRAFT

5.5 Problem situations and solving of problems 5.6 Delays due to unforeseen circumstances 5.7 Survey projection system and height datums

6. QUALITY CONTROL

6.1 Detail description of quality control methodology 6.2 Accuracies (Provide a summary of accuracies obtained)

6.2.1 Horizontal control accuracies

6.2.2 Vertical control accuracies

6.2.3 DTM accuracies

6.2. 4 Structural accuracies

6.2.5 Out of specification tolerances accepted

ANNEXURE 1

(CONTINUED)

7. RECORDS

(Records submitted to the client and the format of digital data supplied.)

8. RECOMMENDATIONS (Results from the survey to be kept in mind for future surveys in the same

area.) 9. GENERAL INFORMATION (Information that the surveyor wants to bring to the attention of the client,

and not mentioned elsewhere in the report.)

SIGNATURE

Printed Name

Designation

Plato Registration Number

Date

NOTE: This report can be supplemented with photographs and bound into the hard copy job file.


DRAFT}(300m Survey Area

Buffer Zone)

Instrument on Survey Station B

Survey Station A

Survey Station C

AD

VA

NC

E W

AR

NIN

G A

REA

1

AD

VA

NC

E W

AR

NIN

G A

REA

2

KM 0.60

KM 0.30

KM 0

Survey assistant

TIN11.3

TIN11.3

TW336 &

TW336 &

300

M

300

M

Flagman no. 2 , 50m behind flagman no. 1

Flagman no. 1 , 20m behind survey assistant

Flagman no. 4 , 50m in front of flagman no. 3

Flagman no. 3 , 20m in front of survey assistant

ANNEXURE 2

TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR WORKING

ON THE ROAD PRISM AND UP TO 5M

FROM THE ROAD PRISM

LOW VOLUME TRAFFIC ROADSFOR


DRAFTWorking area

Traffic Cones

}

75 M

}30 M

}

20 M

}30 M

Flagman 3 , 75m behind flagman no. 2

Flagman no. 4

Flagman no. 1 , 20m behind working area

Flagman no. 2 , 30m behind Flagman no. 1

ANNEXURE 3

TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR STATIC

WORK ON THE ROAD PRISM AND WITHIN 5M

OF THE ROAD PRISM FOR SHORT PERIODS



DRAFT}30 M

}

20 M

50 M

}

Survey Instrument

Staff Carrier

Staff Carrier

Flagman no. 3

Flagman no. 1 , 20m behind Staff Carrier

Flagman no. 2 , 50m behind Flagman no. 1

ANNEXURE 4

TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR SURVEYORS

MOVING ONLY ON THE SHOULDER OF THE ROAD

OR WITHIN 5M OUTSIDE THE ROAD PRISM.



DRAFT

1000m

}(300m Survey Area Buffer Zone)

Instrument on Survey Station B

1000m

Survey Station A

}

50 M

Survey Station C

AD

VA

NC

E W

AR

NIN

G A

REA

1

AD

VA

NC

E W

AR

NIN

G A

REA

2

KM 0.60

KM 0.30

KM 0

Survey assistant

TIN11.3

TIN11.2

TIN11.3

TW336 &

TW336 &

TW336 &

TW336 &

TIN11.2

High Visibility Vehicle

500

M

500

M

Amber Flashing Lights

Black on YellowClass & Retroreflective Panels

TW336

ANNEXURE 5

TR103/TR104 Sign (To be

Rotated to Indicate the Safe Passing Side).

Flagman no. 5 , 30m in front of flagman no. 4

Flagman no. 4 , 20m in front of Surveyor

Flagman no. 3 , 20m behind surveyor


Flagman no. 1

TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR WORKING

ON THE ROAD PRISM AND UP TO 5M

HIGH FROM THE ROAD PRISM FOR

VOLUME SINGLE CARRIAGE WAY ROADS


DRAFTHigh Visibility Vehicle is 20m behind working area

Working areaTraffic Cones

Flagman 3


}

75 M

}30 M

}

20 M

}30 M}300 M

TW336

Class & Retroreflective PanelsBlack on Yellow

To Indicate the Safe Passing Side).TR103/TR104 Sign (To be Rotated


ANNEXURE 6


Flagman no. 1 , 30m behind High Visibility Vehicle

WORK ON THE ROAD PRISM AND WITHIN 5M

OF THE ROAD PRISM FOR SHORT PERIODS

TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR STATIC

FOR HIGH VOLUME SINGLE CARRIAGE WAY ROADS


DRAFT}30 M

}

20 M


30 M

}}

75 M

Survey Instrument


TW336

Class & Retroreflective PanelsBlack on Yellow

To Indicate the Safe Passing Side).TR103/TR104 Sign (To be Rotated


Staff Carrier

Staff Carrier

ANNEXURE 7

Flagman no. 3

Flagman no. 1 , 30m behind High Visibility Vehicle


TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR SURVEYORS

MOVING ONLY ON THE SHOULDER OF THE ROAD

OR WITHIN 5M OUTSIDE THE ROAD PRISM.

HIGH VOLUME SINGLE CARRIAGE WAY ROADSFOR


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 8

FILM INDEX

JOB DESCRIPTION:

SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: FLIGHT PLAN NUMBER:

LOCALITY:

CONTACT SCALE: PHOTOGRAPHY DONE BY:

FLIGHT PLAN SCALE:

FILM NUMBER: DATE:

STRIP NUMBER PHOTO NUMBER REMARKS


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 9

PREMARKS

ANNEXURE 9.1 Premark for photogrammetric aerial surveys

ANNEXURE 9.2 Premark for lidar surveys


DRAFTA

1000

B= A/2

2 2

C

B

PREMARK FOR AERIAL SURVEY

PREMARK FOR PHOTOGRAPHY (ALL SCALES)

ANNEXURE 9.1


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 9.2

600 m

m

PREMARK FOR LIDAR SURVEY FOR POSITION AND HEIGHT

Survey peg

NOTE:

The permanent survey control can be premarked in terms of Annexure 9.1 as if for

100% flat surface painted white.

Use a concrete slab or any

other durable surface such as

Concrete thickness minimum 5cm

1:6000 scale aerial photography

road paving etc.

Existing permanent survey control points have to be used as photo ground control points for all lidar and photogrammetric surveys


DRAFT16mm O STEEL ROD

OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED

50mm FINISHINGLAYER

GROUND LEVEL 255

CONICAL CONCRETE BEACON

N2/25NRB 76/10

ANNEXURE 10

250 m

m

300 m

m275m

m

450m

m

145m

m

16mm


DRAFT

1. DRIVE IRON STANDARD INTO GROUND

TO ENSURE STABILITY IN SOFT MATERIAL

250 mm BEACON COLUMN WITH

PVC OR PITCH FIBER

CASING PAINTED WHITE

200mm LONG

SLEEVE FOR TARGET

SCREED TOP TO

SMOOTH SURFACE

REMOVABLE TARGET 20mm

GALVANISED PIPE PAINTED

RED, WHITE AND BLACK

PILLAR BEACON

WHITE

RED

BLACK

PVC OR PITCH FIBRE CASING

FILL WITH 4:3:1 CONCRETE

2. CONCRETE MIX TO BE 4:3:1 (STONE, SAND ,CEMENT)

NOTES:

SECTION A-A

A A

ANNEXURE 11

150 mm

200mm

END OF PVC/PITCH FIBRE CASTING, 150MM INTO THE CONCRETE BASE

THE REINFORCED STEEL SHALL BE CASTED 450MM

INTO THE BASE AND WILL PROTRUDE 1250MM

ABOVE THE BASE

150 mm

150 mm

1300mm

500mm

500mm 500mm

GROUND LEVEL

8mm reinforced steel bars,1600mm in length ,

with wire binders every 200mm

8mm REINFORCED BARS WITHWIRE BINDERS

BRASS/STAINLESS STEEL STUDIN BASE

CONCRETE BASE


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 12

CO-ORDINATE LIST

SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

SURVEYED BY:

SYSTEM: WG Lo …..… °

NAME & HEIGHT OF DATUM LEVEL POINT

HEIGHT DATUM:

DATE SURVEYED:

SURVEY STATION METRES

Y± METRES

X+

HEIGHT ABOVE M.S.L.

BEACON DESCRIPTION

SURVEYED BY: Name _________________________

CHECKED AND CERTIFIED BY: Name _________________________

SIGNATURE: ______________________________

DATE: ______________________________

PLATO Reg. No.: ______________________________


DRAFT

8.6Km

NRB107/10 NRB107/10 686.887 686.887NRB107/10 NRB01/11 4.660 -4.661 -0.001 4 4.660 NRB01/11 691.547NRB01/11 NRB02/11 1.810 -1.810 0.000 5 1.810 NRB02/11 693.358NRB02/11 NRB03/11 5.156 -5.155 0.001 6 5.156 NRB03/11 698.514NRB03/11 NRB04/11 -0.892 0.890 -0.002 7 -0.891 NRB04/11 697.622NRB04/11 NRB05/11 0.830 -0.828 0.002 8 0.829 NRB05/11 698.451NRB05/11 NRB06/11 -3.350 3.349 -0.001 4 -3.350 NRB06/11 695.101NRB06/11 NRB07/11 5.140 -5.142 -0.002 5 5.141 NRB07/11 700.242NRB07/11 NRB08/11 3.016 -3.016 0.000 6 3.016 NRB08/11 703.258NRB08/11 NRB09/11 0.841 -0.842 -0.001 7 0.842 NRB09/11 704.100NRB09/11 NRB10/11 -0.595 0.603 0.008 * 8 -0.599 NRB10/11 703.501NRB10/11 NRB11/11 -1.235 1.238 0.002 4 -1.236 NRB11/11 702.264NRB11/11 NRB12/11 -0.432 0.435 0.003 5 -0.434 NRB12/11 701.830NRB12/11 NRB13/11 -9.880 9.884 0.003 6 -9.882 NRB13/11 691.949NRB13/11 NRB14/11 1.494 -1.491 0.003 7 1.493 NRB14/11 693.441NRB14/11 NRB15/11 -9.495 9.492 -0.002 8 -9.493 NRB15/11 683.948NRB15/11 NRB16/11 -7.599 7.598 -0.002 4 -7.599 NRB16/11 676.349NRB16/11 NRB17/11 -0.895 0.899 0.004 5 -0.897 NRB17/11 675.452NRB17/11 NRB18/11 11.189 -11.191 -0.002 6 11.190 NRB18/11 686.642NRB18/11 NRB19/11 -5.196 5.202 0.006 * 7 -5.199 NRB19/11 681.443NRB19/11 NRB20/11 -5.672 5.674 0.002 8 -5.673 NRB20/11 675.770NRB20/11 NRB21/11 -3.516 3.522 0.006 * 4 -3.519 NRB21/11 672.251NRB21/11 NRB22/11 13.042 -13.045 -0.003 5 13.043 NRB22/11 685.295NRB22/11 NRB23/11 0.509 -0.510 -0.001 6 0.509 NRB23/11 685.804NRB23/11 NRB24/11 -8.158 8.163 0.005 7 -8.160 NRB24/11 677.644NRB24/11 NRB25/11 7.063 -7.069 -0.006 * 8 7.066 NRB25/11 684.710NRB25/11 NRB26/11 -5.549 5.550 0.001 4 -5.550 NRB26/11 679.160NRB26/11 NRB27/11 2.172 -2.171 0.001 5 2.172 NRB27/11 681.332NRB27/11 NRB28/11 4.508 -4.509 -0.001 6 4.509 NRB28/11 685.840NRB28/11 TSOBM 6 0.891 -0.891 0.000 7 0.891 TSOBM 6 686.731 -0.035 686.696

CHECKS TOTAL -0.143 0.169 0.026 172 -0.156 CHECK -0.156

Allowable error between forward and reverse levelling: 0.003 X √ no of setups

Allowable Closure 0.039Actual Closure 0.026 Pass

Allowable error between Terminal points: 0.013 X √ Total distance in Km between terminal points

Allowable Closure 0.038Actual Closure -0.035 Pass

Out of tolerance closures. Maximum closure between points 300m apart is.005m

Checked by:

Signature Name Plato No

ANNEXURE 13

Beacon Number

Provisional Heights

LEVELS BASED ON NRB107 = 686.887m A.M.S.L. and TSOBM 6 = 686.696m A.M.S.L.

LEVELLING RESULTS

Final Heights

Job Description

Levelling circuit from to

From To Level Forward

Level Reverse Difference No of

Setups Corrections

Total distance

Mean height difference


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 14

REPORT FOR THE VERIFICATION OF EXISTING PERMANENT

SURVEY CONTROL

ANNEXURE 14.1 Beacon construction verification status report

ANNEXURE 14.2 Co-ordinate and height verification survey results

ANNEXURE 14.3 Framework for the compilation of survey reports for verification of survey control


DRAFT

BEACON CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION STATUS REPORT

SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: ........................................................................... SURVEYED BY:......................................................

SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ........................................................................... DATE OF SURVEY: .....................................................

Beacon Number

Beacon Appearance Beacon Tag Beacon

Stability Vegetation

Cleaned Fence post painted at

beacon Arrow on Tar

Beacon Distance from

Fence COMMENTS

. G = Good OR B = Bad Y = Yes OR N = No Meter NRB1/11 B G B Y N Y 1.2 (Example)

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

4.1


DRAFT

CO-ORDINATE AND HEIGHT VERIFICATION SURVEY RESULTS

SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: ......................................................................................... SURVEYED BY: ............................................................................

SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ......................................................................................... DATE SURVEYED: ............................................................................

Beacon No REF Y X Z Y X Z DY DX DZ

1 NRB13/12 REF -97974.92 2759809.57 865.508 20.817 865.508 0.000

2 NRB11/12 -97408.53 2761386.99 869.357 -97408.565 2761386.975 869.494 0.035 0.015 -0.137 890.311 -20.940 869.371 -0.014 869.351 0.006

3 NRB12/12 -97473.55 2761321.10 868.628 -97473.585 2761321.056 868.755 0.035 0.044 -0.127 889.572 -20.934 868.638 -0.010 868.624 0.004

4 NRB14/12 -97935.27 2759737.04 863.112 -97935.273 2759737.015 863.108 0.003 0.025 0.004 883.925 -20.813 863.112 0.000 863.109 0.002

5 NRB15/12 DESTROYED

6 NRB16/12 -98349.21 2758042.76 846.255 -98349.209 2758042.741 846.105 -0.001 0.019 0.150 866.922 -20.678 846.244 0.011 846.260 -0.005

7 NRB17/12 -99851.54 2757055.62 856.217 -99851.559 2757055.634 855.930 0.019 -0.014 0.287 876.747 -20.531 856.216 0.001 856.218 -0.001

8 NRB18/12 -99966.91 2756981.93 854.513 -99966.917 2756981.943 854.209 0.007 -0.013 0.304 875.026 -20.520 854.506 0.007 854.520 -0.007

9 NRB19/12 -101380.99 2756022.20 859.710 -101381.023 2756022.177 859.251 0.033 0.023 0.459 880.068 -20.387 859.681 0.029 859.712 -0.002

10 NRB20/12 -101477.61 2755959.02 860.484 -101477.658 2755958.985 860.024 0.048 0.035 0.460 880.841 -20.378 860.463 0.021 860.481 0.003

11 NRB26/12 REF -105853.24 2751868.68 822.025 19.880 822.020 0.005

NRB20/12 -101477.61 2755959.02 860.484 -101477.619 2755958.992 861.019 0.009 0.028 -0.535 880.899 -20.378 860.521 -0.037 860.479 0.005

12 NRB21/12 -102822.86 2754837.19 822.386 -102822.874 2754837.195 822.740 0.014 -0.005 -0.354 842.620 -20.231 822.389 -0.003 822.384 0.002

13 NRB22/12 -102910.35 2754748.76 823.096 -102910.347 2754748.754 823.447 -0.003 0.006 -0.351 843.327 -20.220 823.107 -0.011 823.100 -0.004

14 NRB23/12 -104374.54 2753232.73 820.103 -104374.553 2753232.741 820.274 0.013 -0.011 -0.171 840.154 -20.034 820.120 -0.017 820.108 -0.005

15 NRB24/12 -104443.44 2753161.29 821.354 -104443.439 2753161.298 821.499 -0.001 -0.008 -0.145 841.379 -20.025 821.354 -0.017 821.365 -0.011

16 NRB25/12 -105793.73 2751949.47 821.072 -105793.741 2751949.461 821.074 0.011 0.009 -0.002 840.954 -19.886 821.068 0.004 821.079 -0.007

17 NRB27/12 -107353.06 2750953.38 830.620 -107353.069 2750953.384 830.473 0.009 -0.004 0.147 850.353 -19.749 830.604 0.016 830.626 -0.006

18 NRB28/12 -107446.71 2750900.02 828.479 -107446.709 2750900.055 828.305 -0.001 -0.035 0.174 848.185 -19.740 828.445 0.034 828.488 -0.009

19 NRB29/12 -108950.28 2749926.04 832.215 -108950.278 2749926.052 831.894 -0.002 -0.012 0.321 851.774 -19.578 832.196 0.019 832.226 -0.011

20 NRB30/12 -109014.97 2749847.77 829.294 -109014.970 2749847.767 828.975 0.000 0.003 0.319 848.855 -19.569 829.286 0.008 829.298 -0.004

21 NRB31/12 -110246.18 2748732.36 822.584 -110246.154 2748732.339 822.118 -0.026 0.021 0.466 841.998 -19.408 822.590 -0.006 822.589 -0.005

22 NRB32/12 -110315.78 2748636.99 826.037 -110315.748 2748636.928 825.543 -0.032 0.062 0.494 845.423 -19.397 826.026 0.011 826.036 0.001

23 NRB33/12 -111498.17 2747340.61 832.477 -111498.120 2747340.594 831.842 -0.050 0.016 0.635 851.722 -19.249 832.473 0.004 832.480 -0.003

24 NRB34/12 -111530.51 2747256.54 834.946 -111530.486 2747256.529 834.300 -0.024 0.011 0.646 854.180 -19.243 834.937 0.009 834.945 0.001

GPS CHECK SURVEY

GPS BASE STATION FOR CHECK SURVEY

EXISTING MINUS CHECK VALUESA

NN

EX

UR

E 1

4.2

Difference

existing Z

MINUS ortho

corrected GPS

levels

Ortho

corrected GPS

levels

No of

beacons

verified

Diff existing Z

MINUS check

survey spirit

levelled heights

Check survey

spirit levelled

heights

Add REFERENCE

BEACON geoid

separation to

GPS heights

Geoid

separation at

individual

Beacons

GPS BASE STATION FOR CHECK SURVEY

CO-ORDINATES TO BE CHECKED (Existing)


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 14.3

FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION OF SURVEY REPORT FOR VERIFICATION OF SURVEY CONTROL

1. SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER 3. SURVEYED BY (Name of organisation that performed the survey)

4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

4.1 Locality of the survey area

4.2 Terrain type description

4.3 Date and duration of the survey

4.4 Surveyors involved (Names, qualifications and registration numbers).

5. EXECUTION OF THE SURVEY PROJECT

5.1 Instrumentation and equipment used

5.2 Detail description of methodology applied

5.2.1 Horizontal verification including orientation and calibration results as well as beacons used to

do the calibration

5.2.2 Vertical verification including levelling results as per Annexure 13

5.3 Problem situations and solving of problems

5.4 Survey projection system and height datums used to verify the existing survey


DRAFT

6. VERIFICATION RESULTS

6.1 Accuracies (General discussion on the accuracies found through the verification survey)

6.1.1 Horizontal accuracies: Comments on beacon verification survey results and supply a list of

the out of tolerance beacons showing the beacon numbers, dy and dx errors. (Also attach a

spread sheet as per Annexure 14.2 to this report).

6.1.2 Vertical accuracies: Comments on beacon verification results and supply a list of the out of

tolerance beacons showing the dz errors. (Also attach a spread sheet as per Annexure 14.2

to this report).

6.1.3 Beacon construction status: Supply a list of beacon numbers not conforming to the

requirements. General comments on beacons quality and appearance. (Also attach spread

sheet as per Annexure 14.1 and provide photos to prove the non-compliance of the

beacons.

7. RECOMMENDATIONS

(The Surveyor must make a recommendation indicating whether these beacons and their

values are acceptable for future use. If no such recommendation can be made, the

Surveyor has to advise the Client on actions to be taken in order to rectify the quality and/or

accuracy of the control).

8. RECORDS

(List all records submitted to the Client and indicate the format of digital data supplied. All

new survey data and reductions shall be supplied.)

9. GENERAL INFORMATION

(Supply any other information that the surveyor wants to bring to the attention of the Client,

which is not mentioned elsewhere in this report.)

SIGNATURE .............................................................

Printed Name .............................................................

Designation .............................................................

Plato Registration Number ..............................................................

Date .............................................................

NOTE: This report can be supplemented with photographs and binded into the hard copy

job file.


DRAFT

SURVEY FEATURE CODES

Common abbreviations to be used with the codes below

ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION

B- Bottom of ………..... Use the relevant abbreviation below C- Centre of ………...... Use the relevant abbreviation below CONC- Concrete ……….…. Use the relevant abbreviation below CR- Corner of ……..…… Use the relevant abbreviation below E- End of ………..……. Use the relevant abbreviation below ED- Edge of ……………. Use the relevant abbreviation below L- Left of …………..…. Use the relevant abbreviation below MID- Middle of ………….. Use the relevant abbreviation below R- Right of ………...…. Use the relevant abbreviation below T- Top of ……………… Use the relevant abbreviation below

X-

If measurements are not to be included in DTM Use the relevant abbreviation below

DESCRIPTION CODE

Abutment AB Arrow AW Bank (natural features, river, donga, etc.…) B Beginning of curve BCURVE Beginning of transition curve BTC Bench mark BM Boom Security BOOM Borehole BH Box culvert BC Break-point BP Bridge BRG Bridge deck BD Bridge Pier PIER Building BLD Cable duct CD Cable marker CM Catch pit CP Centre line CL Centreline road - broken and solid lines CLBS Centreline Road - broken lines CLB Centreline road - solid lines CLS Change of slope CS Channel CH Concrete CONC Concrete / cement CC Concrete palisade wall PAL Corner Building 1, 2 etc. (All common building points with same number) CB1 Crossing power line XPL Crossing telephone line XTL Crown Line – if not the same as CL CROWN Culvert CULV Curb C Curve CURVE Dam DAM

ANNEXURE 15


DRAFT

Dashed white line DWL Drain D Drive way DW Drop inlet DI Duct DUCT End curve ECURVE Fence (Wire fence) F Fence electric FE Fence post FP Fence Security FS Fence stock proof FSP Field Inlet (Storm water) FI Fill of existing road FILL Fire Hydrant FH Floor Level FL Foot bank (natural features, river, donga, etc.) FB Furrow FUR Gate GT Gate post GP Geotechnical bore hole GBH Geotechnical test pit GTPT Grave yard GY Gravel road GRD Gravel shoulder of existing road GS Ground G Guardrail GR Gutter GU Headwall HW House HS Invert level IL Invert level with pipe size IL100 Kerb K Kerb inlet KI Kilometre marker old KM 23 KMO23 Kilometre marker (32.2N – add number) KM (32.2N) Lamp post (Light pole) LP Land L Left hand side LHS Manhole MH Median M Neotel manhole NEOMH Overhang of building OH Paving PV Pillar PILL Pipe P Pipe culvert PC Pipe line Marker PLM Post office manhole POM Power box PB Power line PL Power pole PP Pre cast wall PREW Pylon PYLN Railway line RL Red line RL Reservoir RES Right hand side RHS River RIV Road R Rock RCK Rocky area RCKA Rondaval (Survey 3 Shots) ROND Security fence SF

ANNEXURE 15

(CONTINUED)


DRAFT

Septic tank ST Sewer manhole SEWMH Shoulder SH Side drain SDR Side walk SWLK Sign board (number of poles for board) SB(1) Sign gantry SG Sign post SP Slope (spot shot between BP and TOE) SLP Soffit level SL Soil S Solid white line SWL Spot shot SS Stake value SV Stay pole STYP Stay wire STYW Steel palisade wall SPAL Stone pitched STP Stop street road marking STOP Storm water manhole SWMH Stream STR Tap Water TAP Tar T Telephone booth TPB Telephone line TL Telephone pole TP Telkom cable marker TCM Telkom manhole TELMH Toe of embankment/cut/fill TOE Toilet TOI Track TR Traffic sign TS Transformer TF Transition curve TC Tree TRE Underground pipe line UPL Wall (Brick) W Water WA Water course WC Water pipe WP Water pipe and size WP150 Water valve WV Wing wall WW 'Y' standard YSD Yellow line YL

Note: If no specific code is provided in this list then new codes may be created taking into

account the principles used for the creation of the codes in the list of survey feature codes.

The Surveyor shall also supply a list of the newly created feature codes to the Client

on submission of the survey.

ANNEXURE 15

(CONTINUED)


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 16

TYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A ROAD,

STREET AND RAIL PRISMS

ANNEXURE 16.1 Typical positions for single carriageway survey points

ANNEXURE 16.2 Typical positions for dual carriageway and city street survey points

ANNEXURE 16.3 Typical positions for rail prism and track survey points


DRAFT

ROAD MARKINGS ROAD MARKINGS

ROAD MARKINGS ROAD MARKINGS

TYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A ROAD PRISM

AN

NE

XU

RE

16

.1

TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR SINGLE CARRIAGEWAY SURVEY POINTS

(ROAD IN CROSS-FALL & RAMPS)

TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR SINGLE CARRIAGEWAY SURVEY POINTS

(ROAD IN CAMBER)

NATURAL GROUND

NATURAL GROUND

NATURAL GROUND

NATURAL GROUND

TOESHBP

CR

TD

SHBPBD

TB

TOESHBP

TBBD

TD

SHBP

BEDT

TEDT(100MM FROM ACTUAL EDGE)

BEDT


BEDT


BEDT

TEDT(100MM FROM ACTUAL EDGE)C.L

C.L


DRAFTTYPICAL POSITIONS FOR DUAL CARRIAGEWAY SURVEY POINTS

TYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A ROAD PRISM

AN

NE

XU

RE

16

.2

NATURAL GROUND

NATURAL GROUND

NATURAL GROUND NATURAL GROUND

TOESHBP

SHBP

TD

BDTBTEDT

TEDT

TEDTTEDT

BEDT

BEDTBEDT

BEDT

CM

C.L

C.L

C.L

EC

BCHBCH

EC

ED TAR ED TAR

PAVING

ED PAVING ED PAVING

PAVING

TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR CITY STREETS SURVEY POINTS

NOTE: TEDT IS 100mm FROM THE ACTUAL EDGE

NOTE: TEDT IS 100mm FROM THE ACTUAL EDGE


DRAFTTYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A RAIL PRISM

AN

NE

XU

RE

16

.3

NATURAL GROUND

NATURAL

GROUND

TB

TD

BD

SHBP

CRLCRL

SHBP

ED-SLEEPER

ED-SLEEPER

TOE

TB

TOE

TBTOE

TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR RAIL PRISM AND TRACK SURVEY POINTS

NOTE 1: HEIGHTS TAKEN ON TOP OF THE RAIL NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DTM


DRAFTROADS

AN

NE

XU

RE

17

BC

IL

BC

BWW

BWW

TWW

TWW

THW

THW

EDHW( ON GROUND )

BWW BC BC BWWIL

TWW TWWTHW THW

90

A

A

B

H

ELEVATION A - A

CULVERT & STRUCTURES

Extent of concrete slab

Extent of concrete slab

PLAN VIEW


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 18

TYPICAL SURVEY POINTS ON BRIDGES

ANNEXURE 18.1 Position of cross-section for top and bottom deck survey points (Bridge Deck)

ANNEXURE 18.2 Positions and dimensions of survey positions on Bridge Piers

ANNEXURE 18.3 Positions of survey points on Soffit Edges and Abutments

ANNEXURE 18.4 Dimensions to be surveyed and shown on the final drawings for gantries (Sectional view) ANNEXURE 18.5 Dimensions to be surveyed and shown on the final drawings for gantries (Top view)


DRAFT

AN

NE

XU

RE

18

.1

STRUCTURAL SURVEY

BRIDGE DECK

A B C D E F G H

K L M NA

O P

T1 T2 T3

B1 B2

B3 B4

B5 B6

SIDE VIEWNOTE:

SECTION A - A POSITIONS ON THE BOTTOM AND

TOP CROSS - SECTIONS TO BE SURVEYED

-It is the intention that the dimensions of all structural elementsneed to be surveyed

-Side walks on the bridgeshall also be included

in the top cross- section

A

-All positions shall be surveyed in y , x and z

POSITION OF CROSS-SECTION FOR TOP DECK SURVEY POINTS (A TO H)POSITION OF CROSS-SECTION FOR BOTTOM DECK SURVEY POINTS (K TO P)

Position of actual shapeand balustrade


-The numbering coventionfor spot shots shall be

as followscross- section at position A (TOP)

AT1,AT2,AT3cross- section at position N (BOTTOM)

NB1,NB2,NB3


DRAFT

AN

NE

XU

RE

18

.2

BRIDGE PIER

STRUCTURAL SURVEY

LEGEND

Y X Z CO - ORDINATES

MEASURED DISTANCES

.

ds

A B C D

A

AB

UT

ME

NT

AB

UT

ME

NT

SOFFIT EDGESOFFIT EDGE

ds ds ds ds

S S S

DIMENSIONS AND SHAPEOF COLUMN

INCREASING CHAINAGE

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

A

observationpoints

to determinethe shape

of thepiers

SECTION A - A

NOTE: Sufficient shots shall be taken to

determine the shape of the piers

PLAN

Top foundation

Top pier

Bottom pier on foundation

.

. . . .

...


DRAFT

AN

NE

XU

RE

18

.3

SOFFIT EDGE & ABUTMENTS

STRUCTURAL SURVEY

LEGEND

.

F= FOUNDATION

S=MEASURED DISTANCE

=Y X Z CO - ORDINATES

G=GROUND

S=SOFFIT

R=RIGHT

A=ABUTMENT

L=LEFT

SECTION ALONG SOFFIT EDGE

SECTION ALONG SOFFIT EDGE

SOFFIT EDGE SOFFIT EDGE

POSITIONS DIRECTLY BELOWSOFFIT EDGE

LEFT POSITIONS RIGHT POSITIONS

10M

10M

10M

10M

10M RA14

RA1

RA2RA3

RA4RA5

RA6

RA7RA8

RA9

RA10

RA11

RA12

RAB

10M

RF1RF7

RG1 RG2RF3

RF4 RF5

RF6

RG3RG4 RG8

RF7

SURVEY POSITIONS ALONG THE RIGHT HAND SOFFIT EDGE

NOTE:

SECTION A - A

A

A

Position descriptions along the left hand side shall start with L




DRAFT154 DURBAN

Higginson H’way

ChatsworthPort Shepstone

CE

NT

RE

LIN

E

CE

NT

RE

LIN

E

TOP OF PLATE = 78162mm

SCALE 1:50

SECTIONAL VIEW

360mm

620mm

790mm

7130mm

5370mm180mm

1240mm

270mm

3040mm

250mm

36mm

3400mm

1290mm

200mm

5610mm2380mm

450mm

5610mm

24590mm

200mm

676mm

1760mm

5460mm

180mm

7220mm

300mm

7190mm

TOP OF PLATE = 77767.00mm

TOP OF CONCRETE = 77468.00mm

ELEVATION=86238mm

ELEVATION=87413mm ELEVATION=86657mm

6370mm

ELEVATION=86202mm

TOP OF CONCRETE = 77870mm

AN

NE

XU

RE

18

.4

GANTRIES - SECTIONAL VIEW


DRAFT 77.412BC

78.159BC

77.757BC 77.762BC

77.761BC

79.105BC

84.199BG

84.242BG 84.201BG

86.238BG

77.466BOLT 77.468BOLT

77.465BOLT

77.464BOLT

77.463BOLT

77.458BOLT 77.462BOLT

77.457BOLT

77.460BOLT

77.337BOLT

77.864BOLT 77.857BOLT 77.870BOLT

77.868BOLT 77.873BOLT

77.861BOLT

77.858BOLT

77.820BOLT

84.465BP

84.501BP

84.746BP

84.757

BP 84.505

BP 86.013BP

79.105P

78.984P 78.981P

77.354PL

77.358PL

77.351PL

77.412PL

77.820PL

77.822PL

77.764PL

77.760TC

77.756TC

77.761TC

77.468TC

78.162TC

78.162TC

77.870TC

86.118TG 86.133TG 85.362TG

85.309TG 86.604TG

86.657TG 87.424TG 87.413TG

84.167TG

86.236TP 86.007TP

86.008TP

86.202TP 85.976TP

84.705TP

86.257TP

77.767TP

SIGNBOARD SIGNBOARD

CE

NT

RE

LIN

E

CE

NT

RE

LIN

E

SCALE 1:50

TOP VIEW

24590mm

120mm

90mm

120mm

100mm

880mm

430mm

180mm

TOP OF BOLT=77462.00mm

430mm

880mm

120mm

90mm120mm

100mm

SOP 1 - Y= 4980.3125 X= 3312003.3925

TOP OF BOLT=77462.00mm

SCALE 1:5

see inset 1

INSET 1 INSET 2

SCALE 1:5

TOP OF BOLT=77858mm

TOP OF BOLT=77858mm

SOP 2 - Y= 5004.8025 X = 3312001.1995

SEE INSET 2

880m

m

100mm 120mm 90mm 120mm

45.00mm

75.00mm 75.00mm

45.00mm

120mm90mm120mm100mm

430mm430mm

880m

m

AN

NE

XU

RE

18

.5

GANTRIES - TOP VIEW


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 19

CAD CONFIGURATION AND CONVERSION TABLES

BETWEEN PEN SIZES AND LINE WEIGHTS

ANNEXURE 19.1 CAD configuration pages Pages 1 to 10

ANNEXURE 19.2 Conversion table between Pen sizes and Line weights as per CAD configuration requirements


DRAFT

Page 1 of 10

CAD CONFIGURATION

SIZES SPECIFIED ARE FOR 1:1000 DRAWINGS: TO BE CHANGED FOR OTHER SCALES

LEVEL / LAYER

DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT

LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

1

Title, Border, etc. Title, Border: Proclamation sketches Strip No. of Proclamation sketches To the Client’s requirements

0 0 Blue (33)

Sheet: A0PSP Sheet: A4CAD

Place Cell / Block

1:1000 Ø = 6mm Text = 25mm height

(1:10 000)

2 Cadastral Boundaries Farm boundary Erven/Portion/Sub-division boundary International Boundary Provincial Boundary District and Municipal Boundary Centre line (River) and Farm Boundary

2 1 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0

Red (51) White (0) Red (51) Red (51) Red (51) Red (51)

Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear

3

Servitudes Lines

1

3

White (0)

Linear

4

Cut and Fill Top Bottom Hatching

1 0 0

0 2 0

Brown (22) Brown (6) Brown (6)

Bank Bank Bank

5

Contours Major Minor Major Labels Minor Labels

1 0 1 0

0 0 0 0

Brown (86) Brown (6)


Contour Contour Contour Contour

Place Place

Label: TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm Label: TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm

6

Water Features Edge River Flow arrows for rivers & canals (centre river) Chute Canaling Water Edge Canal

1 1 0 1

0 0 0 0

Blue (15) Blue (15) Blue (1) Blue (1)

Linear Linear Linear Linear

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1


DRAFT

Page 2 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

Streams/Ditches: Perennial River Seasonal River Concrete Furrow Drainage Furrow

0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0

Blue (1) Blue (1)

Blue (17) Blue (17)

Linear Linear Linear Linear

7 Roads Major Tar Minor Gravel, Gravel Road Gravel Shoulder Remains Road Minor Tar Bridge Culvert Guard Rail Kerb Sign Board (All Road Signs) Overhead Road Signs Route Marker/Km Stone Route Marker/Km Stone Text

1 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0

0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

Red (35) Red (19) Red (19) Red (3)

Red (19) Red (35) Red (19) Grey (80)

Green (130) Purple (21) Purple (21) Green (2) Green (2)

Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear

Structure Linear Symbol Linear Symbol Linear Symbol

Text

Miscellaneous, Sign Board SB 1, SB 2

Miscellaneous, Km/RM TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm

8

Railways Single Track Electrified Track Signal

1 1 0

0 0 0

Red (3) Red (3) Red (3)

Linear Linear Symbol

9

Dams + Lakes Lakes/Pans/Dams (Outline) Dam Symbol (Water Symbol)

1 0

0 0

Blue (17) Blue (7)

Linear Symbol

Geological

10 Constructed Development Permanent Building Temporary Building Hatching Buildings Outline Buildings Ruins Water Tank Sport Fields/Courts Catch Pit Fire Hydrant Flag Pole

2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0

Red (19) Red (19) Red (3)

Red (19) Red (19) Blue (17)

Green (18) Red (19) Blue (23) White (0)

Structure Structure 45° Angle Structure Structure Structure

Structure Symbol Symbol

Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 3 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

Graves Manhole Monument Tap/Breather Dip Trough Silo Kraal Inspection Hole Radio Mast Rondavel/Hut Carport Foundation Stoep Ramp Shack Reservoir Fuel Tank Septic Tank Windmill Well Fountain Graveyard Outline Concrete Wall Dry Stone Wall Borehole Building under Construction Ruins Walls

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0

Purple (29) Blue (17)

Purple (29) Blue (23) Blue (17) Blue (17) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19)

Green (130) Green (130) Green (130)

Grey (8) Red (35) Blue (71) Blue (71) Blue (71)

Grey (120) Blue (17)

Purple (29) Red (19)

Brown (190) Blue (23) Red (3) Red (3)

Red (19)

Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol

Structure Structure Symbol Linear Symbol

Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Linear Linear Linear Linear Symbol Symbol Linear

Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells

11

Fences Standard Boundary (cadastral) Security Gate Cattle Grid

0 2 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

Blue (1) White (0) Blue (1) Blue (1)

Grey (120)

Linear Linear Linear Symbol Symbol

Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells

12

Vegetation Outline Symbol Golf Course Outline

0 0 0

1 0 1


Linear Symbol Linear

Cultivation, land

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 4 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

Land/Cultivation Bush Trees Reeds Hedge Irrigated Land Irrigated Vineyard Orchard/Vineyard Plantation Forrest Reeds/Marsh

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0



Green (2) Blue (71)

Green (2) Green(2) Green (2) Green (2)

Green (90) Blue (71)

Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Linear Symbol Symbol

Symbol

Symbol

Symbol

Bush Trees Reeds Linear

Cultivation, hatch area Cultivation, hatch area Cultivation, hatch area

Trees, hatch area

Reeds, hatch area

13

Electric Power Powerline U/G Cables

0 0

0 2

Red (3) Red (3)

Pole Linear

14

Telephone + Telec + Radio Poles (telephone, electric) Outer circle Inner circle Light Pole Outer circle Inner circle Line Underground Line Poles Telephone pole without position

0 2

0 2

0 0 0 1

0 0

0 0

0 2 0 1

White(0) Red (3)

White (0) Red (3)

Green (2) Green (2) Green (2) Green (2)

Pole Pole

Pole Pole

Linear Pole Pole Pole

15

Pipelines Underground gas pipeline Optic fibre cables Surface Pipe Underground Pipe

1 1

1 1

3 3

0 3

Green (18) Green (18)

Blue (17) Blue (17)

Linear Linear

Linear Linear

16

Shafts Shafts

0

0

Red (3)

Shaft

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 5 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

17

Paths Footpath Track

0 0

2 3


Linear Linear

18

DTM Mark (Observations) DTM Mark (Observations)

0

0

White (0)

Cell

19

Mining Lease Mining Lease Boundary Beacon

2 0

0 0


20

Grid + Values Grid + Values

1

0

White (0)

21

Sand + Rock Sand Symbol Outline Rock Symbol Outline Solid Rock/Scattered Rock

0 0

0 0 0

0 5

0 5 0


Brown (6) Brown (22) Brown (6)

Symbol Linear

Symbol Linear Symbol

Geological Geological

Geological Geological Geological

22

Fire Break Fire Break Soil Erosion/Eroded Area

0 0

2 2


Linear Linear

23

Servitude Diagram Text Servitude Diagram Text

0

0

White (0)

Text

TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

24 Control All text 2.5mm height NRB Symbol NRB Height NRB Number Photo control (X, Y, Z)

1 1 1 1

0

0 0 0 0

0

White (0) White (0) White (0)

Red (35)

SPoint, NRB SPoint, DES

Structure

Symbol

3mm and 1.5mm Ø 25mm Ø TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

θ 3mm Ø TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 6 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

Trig Bench Mark Trig Survey Beacon Temporary Survey Station Photo ground control (X, Y) HP Horizontal Photo ground control (Z) LPC Vertical PGC (photogram) CP/PC Traverse Arrow

1 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

White (0) Red (35)

Purple (21) Red (35) Red (35) Red (35) White (0)

Circle & Text Spoint, PGC

SPoint TSBM

SPoint, TBN SPoint, TEMP

SPoint, HP SPoint, LPC SPoint, CP

Symbol

TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

θ 3mm Ø TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm θ 3mmØ TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm θ 3mmØ TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm θ 3mmØ TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

25

Spot height mark Spot height mark

0

0

White (0)

SPoint, Spot

26

Township street + gravel roads Township Streets Gravel Road

1 1

0 3

White (0) White (0)

27

DTM Height (Observation) DTM Height

0

0

White (0)

TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

28

Default 2

29

Township Dimensions Township Dimensions

0

0

Red (19)

TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

30 Co-ordinate List Co-ordinate List

0

0

White (0)

TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm

31 North Arrow + Sheet Layout North Arrow Project Number Sheet Layout

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

Red (19) White (0) White (0) White (0)

Symbol

North Arrow TH = 2mm TW = 2mm Place Block, 45 x 30

TH = 3mm TW = 3mm

32 Text For Cadastral Farm Name

1

0

Red (51)

TH = 7mm TW = 7mm

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 7 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

Subdivision Name Name on Boundary Street Name International Boundary Provincial Boundary District/Municipal Boundary Centre Line River and Farm Boundary Erven/Agricultural Holdings Town or Farm Boundary

1 0 2 2 1 1 1 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0) Red (35) White (0)

White (0)

TH = 4.5mm TW = 4.5mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm

TH = 4.5mm TW = 4.5mm Or TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

TH = 4mm TW = 4mm

33 Text for Servitudes Text for Servitudes

0

0

White (0)

TH = 4.5mm TW = 4.5mm

34 Text for cut and fill Text for cut and fill

0

0

White (0)

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

35 Text for spot height Text for spot height

0

0

White (0)

TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

36 Text for Water Features Text for Water Features

1

0

Blue (15)

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

37 Text for Roads Text for Roads Text for Clearance Heights Text for Overhead Sign Board/Gantries Destination Description Route Description Bridge Annotation Culvert Description Culvert Arrow Km Stone Description Route Mark Description Sign Board Ellipse Text Sign Board Text

0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0

0

0

0

0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

0

0

0

0

Red (3) White (0) White (0) Red (35) Red (19) Red (35) White (0)

Red (19)

Geen(2)

Red (19)

Purple (21)

Purple (21)

Text Text Text Text

Structure Needle

Structure

Structure

Symbol

Symbol

Symbol

Text

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm

Misc Des, Block & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

Symbol: Indicator

Misc Des, Circle & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

Misc Des, Block & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

SB Ellipse & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 8 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

Destination Arrow Road Markings: Solid White (0) Solid Yellow Centre Line etc. Dashed White Line Two Solid and one Dashed White Line One Solid and one Dashed White Line

0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0

0 0 0 2

0&2&0 0&2

Red (35)

White (0) Yellow (4) White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0)

Symbol

Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear

Destination Arrow

38

Text for Railways Text for Railways Station Name

0 0

0 0

White (0) White (0)

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 5mm TW = 5mm

39

Text for Dams + Lakes Text for Dams + Lakes

0

0

Blue (17)

TH = 2mm TW = 2mm

40 Text for Constructed Development Text for Constructed Development

1

0

Colour should match the colour of the

symbol eg. (17), (18) etc.

All text on this level: TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

41

Text for Fences Text for Fences

1

0

Blue (17)

All text on this level:

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

42 Text for Vegetation Text for Vegetation

1

0

Green (18)


TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

43 Text for Electric Power Text for Electric Power

1

0

Red (19)


TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

44 Text for Telephone + Telec + Radio Text for Telephone + Telec + Radio

1

0

Green (18)


TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

45 Text for Pipelines Text for Pipelines Text for Gas Pipelines Text for Optic Fibre Pipelines

1 1 1

0 0 0

Blue (17) Green (18) Green (18)


TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 9 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

46

Text for Shafts Text for Shafts

1

0

Green (18)


TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

47 Text for Paths Text for Paths

1

0

Red (19)


TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

48 Text for DTM Codes Text for DTM Codes

0

0

White (0)


TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm

49 Text for Mining Lease Text for Mining Lease

0

0

Green (18)

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

50 Photo Centres Symbol Text

1 0

0 0


Symbol Symbol

Photo Centre TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

51

Text for Sand + Rock Text for Sand + Rock

0

0

White (0)

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

52

Text for Fire Break Text for Fire Break

0

0

Brown (22)

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm

53 National Road Reserve Line National Road Reserve Line

0

3 or 0

Red (51)

Import Sline, Adjust Configure Change style to (0) when NRR falls

on cadastral

54 National Road Reserve Beacon National Road Reserve Beacon

0

0

White (0)

Create Cell under SPoint

θ 3mmØ

55

Hatching of National Road Reserve Area Hatching of National Road Reserve Area

0

0

Green

Create Cell under Sign

Hatch Pattern Area 1:10 000 r = 1mm

56

National Road Reserve Beacon Number National Road Reserve Beacon Number

0

0

White (0)

SPoint (name)

TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 15mm TW = 15mm (1:10 000)

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 10 of 10

LEVEL / LAYER


LINE STYLE

COLOUR AND CODE

CELLS REMARKS

57 Keyplan Number Text Keyplan Number Text

1

0

White (0)

58 Keyplan Sheet Number Text Keyplan Sheet Number Text

1

0

White (0)

59 Triangles Triangles

0

0

Green (50)

60 Cadastral Parcel Cut Lines Cadastral Parcel Cut Lines

0

0

Green (2)

61 Property Identifier Text Property Identifier Text

0

0

White (0)

62 Key Plan Extent Boundary Lines Key Plan Extent Boundary Lines

0

1

White (0)

63 Internal Sheet Extent Lines Internal Sheet Extent Lines

0

1

White (0)

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFTCONVERSION TABLE BETWEEN PEN SIZE

AND LINE WEIGHTS AS PER SPECIFICATION

PEN1

PEN WEIGHT

PEN2

PEN3

PEN4

PEN5

PEN6

PEN7

PEN8

PEN9

SIZESIZE WEIGHT PEN

PEN10

PEN11

PEN12

PEN13

PEN14

PEN15

PEN16

PEN17

PEN18

PEN19

PEN20

PEN21

PEN22

PEN23

PEN24

PEN25

PEN26

PEN27

PEN28

PEN29

PEN30

WEIGHT 0

WEIGHT 1

WEIGHT 2

WEIGHT 3

WEIGHT 4

WEIGHT 5

WEIGHT 6

WEIGHT 7

WEIGHT 8

WEIGHT 9

WEIGHT 10

WEIGHT 11

WEIGHT 12

WEIGHT 13

WEIGHT 14

WEIGHT 15

WEIGHT 16

WEIGHT 17

WEIGHT 18

WEIGHT 19

WEIGHT 20

WEIGHT 21

WEIGHT 22

WEIGHT 23

WEIGHT 24

WEIGHT 25

WEIGHT 26

WEIGHT 27

WEIGHT 28

WEIGHT 29

0.25

0.5

0.75

1.25

1.5

1.75

0.375

0.625

0.875

1

1.125

1.375

1.625

1.875

2

2.125

2.25

2.375

2.5

2.625

2.75

2.875

3

3.125

3.25

3.375

3.5

3.625

3.75

3.875

SIZE WEIGHT PEN

PEN30 WEIGHT 304

4.125PEN 31 WEIGHT 31

LINE STYLE

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AN

NE

XU

RE

19

.2


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 20

LEVEL STRUCTURE FOR CAD WORK "Note: No level numbers shall be used, only level descriptions as indicated" Number Name to be used in the CAD layer structure 0 Default 1 Title + Border etc. 2 Cadastral Boundaries 3 Servitudes 4 Cut and Fill 5 Contours 6 Water Features 7 Roads 8 Railways 9 Dams + Lakes 10 Constructed Development 11 Fences 12 Vegetation 13 Electric power 14 Telephone + Telec + Radio 15 Pipelines 16 Shafts 17 Paths 18 DTM Marks (Observations) 19 Mining Lease 20 Grid + Values 21 Sand + Rock 22 Fire Break 23 Servitude Diagram Text 24 Survey Control 25 Spot height mark 26 Township streets + gravel roads 27 DTM Height (Observation) 28 Default 2 29 Township Dimensions 30 Coordinate-List 31 North Arrow + Sheet Layout 32 Text for Cadastral 33 Text for Servitudes 34 Text for cut + fill 35 Text for Spot height 36 Text for Water Features 37 Text for Roads 38 Text for Railways 39 Text for Dams + Lakes 40 Text for Constructed Development 41 Text for Fences 42 Text for Vegetation 43 Text for Electric power 44 Text for Telephone + Telec + Radio 45 Text for Pipelines 46 Text for Shafts 47 Text for Paths 48 DTM Codes 49 Text for Mining Lease 50 Photo Centres 51 Text for Sand + Rock 52 Text for Fire Break 53 National Road Reserve Line 54 National Road Reserve Beacon 55 Hatching of National Road Reserve Area 56 National Road Reserve Beacon Number 57 Key Plan Number Text 58 Key Plan Sheet Number Text 59 Triangles 60 Cadastral Parcel Cut Lines 61 Property Identifier Text 62 Key Plan Extent Boundary Lines 63 Internal Sheet Extent Lines


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 21

CAD SYMBOL SIZES AND WEIGHTS

ANNEXURE 21.1 TO 21.27 CAD symbol sizes and weights


DRAFT204

1416,8

205

416 834

TITLE DESCRIPTION

TRIG SURVEY BEACON

TRIG SURVEY BENCH MARK

PERMANENT SURVEY STATION FIXED BY TRAVESING

STATE ELEVATION AND NUMBER

SURVEY DATA

LINE: WEIGHT 0

TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8


LINE: WEIGHT 1


AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.1

LINE: WEIGHT 1

WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE

NRB 200

1520.000

SCREEN COLOURS1:1000

SYMBOL

TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH

= 25M

= 1.5M & 3.0M

O

O

BELOW THE SYMBOL

AT GROUND LEVEL

NUMBER ABOVE AND ELEVATION


DRAFT1120

AUX NR 6

83

PC 207

2416 83

4441

416 8SPOT HEIGHT

AERIAL PHOTO PRINCIPAL POINT

PHOTO GROUND CONTROL POINT

TEMPORARY SURVEY STATION

TITLE DESCRIPTION

TACHE SURVEYS

AND VERTICALLY

FIXED HORIZONTALLY

AND PHOTO NUMBER

STATE FLIGHTSTRIP

DOT INDICATES THE POSITION

SURVEY DATA



CIRCLE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0


AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.2


= 3.0M

= 3.0M

EDR


SYMBOL


O

O


DRAFTTITLE

STREET NAMES

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY

PROVINCIAL BOUNDARY

DISTRICT OR MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY

TOWN OR FARM BOUNDARY

TEXT: WEIGHT 2 & TH=4 TW=4


LINE: WEIGHT 2


LINE: WEIGHT 2


LINE: WEIGHT 2


LINE: WEIGHT 2

BOUNDARIES

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.3



SYMBOL


JONES STREET

(AVENUE,GROVE,SINGLE)OR SMALLER

SOUTH AFRICA

ZIMBABWE

GAUTENG

MPUMALANGA

PRETORIA

JOHANNESBURG

LOOF 391 - JR

VAALKOP 267 - JR

= 3.5M & 2.5MO


DRAFTCENTRE LINE

NOT REGISTERD SUBDIVISION

SERVITUDE OR APPROVED BUT

SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY

ERVEN OR FARM

TITLE

BOUNDARIES & CADASTRAL DATA

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 2

LINE: WEIGHT 1

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.4


LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 4

LINE STYLE 0


SYMBOL


FENCE ON CADASTRAL BOUNDARY

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE


DRAFTSOLID LINE

DASHED LINE

2 SOLIDS AND A DASHED LINE

SOLID AND DASHED LINE

YELLOW LINE

TITLE

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.5


LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 0

SYMBOL1:1000

SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH

ROAD CENTER AND YELLOW LINE


DRAFTTITLE

NATIONAL ROAD RESERVE

BOUNDARY

NATIONAL ROAD RESERVE

BOUNDARY

FARM OR TOWNSHIP NAMES

SUBDIVISION NUMBERS

ERF OR AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS

NUMBERS OR SERVITUDES TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=4.5 TW=4.5


= 3M

LINE: WEIGHT 0

= 3M

LINE: WEIGHT 0

BOUNDARIES & CADASTRAL DATA

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.6


REGISTERS ON AN EXISTING CADASTRAL BOUNDARY

DOES NOT REGISTER ON AN EXISTING CADASTRAL BOUNDARY

SYMBOL1:1000



PTN 8

679/SERV ROW

KLOOF 391-JR

O

O

L1 L2

R4 R5



OR SMALLER TO FIT AVAILABLE SPACE




DRAFT = 3M & 0.9M

CIRCLE: WEIGHT 2 & WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

= 3M & 0.9M


LINE: WEIGHT 0

= 3M & 0.9M



= 3M & 0.9MSOLITARY

INDIVIDUAL POLE POSITIONS

FIXED BY SURVEY

INDIVIDUAL POLE POSITIONS

FIXED BY SURVEY

LAMP POST

PYLONS

POWER LINES

TELEPHONE LINE

TITLE DESCRIPTION

MISCELLANEOUS

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.7


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE STYLE 2

SYMBOL1:1000


UNDER GROUND POWER CABLES MH MH

O

O

O

O


DRAFT

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 2


LINE: WEIGHT 1


LINE: WEIGHT 1

MISCELLANEOUS

DESCRIPTION

ABOVE GROUND: WATER

AIR, SEWER ETC.

TEMPORARY BUILDINGS

PERMANENT BUILDINGS

PIPE LINES

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.8


UNDER GROUND PIPE LINES

BELOW GROUND

(DESCRIBE APPROPRIATELY)

UNDER GROUND GAS PIPE LINES TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8

LINE: WEIGHT 1


LINE: WEIGHT 1

= 6.0M

= 6.0M

LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 0

SYMBOL1:1000

SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTHTITLE

LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 3

Eg.300MM WATER MAIN

Eg.100MM U/G SEWER

UNDER GROUND OPTIC FIBER CABLES


LINE: WEIGHT 1


LINE: WEIGHT 1

ABOVE GROUND


LINE STYLE 0

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICELINE STYLE 3

ALL UNDER GROUND SERVICES

ALL ABOVE GROUND SERVICES

UNDER GROUND


DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

OFC

G

O

O


DRAFT

BOX CULVERTS22 INDICATES THE NUMBER

ON THE SCHEDULE

21 INDICATES THE NUMBER

ON THE SCHEDULEPIPE CULVERTS

SILO

TROUGH

DIP

TITLE DESCRIPTION

MISCELLANEOUS

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0


TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5 AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.9

WEIGHT & LETTER SIZESYMBOL1:1000


LINE: WEIGHT 2 (WING WALLS)


LINE: WEIGHT 2 (WING WALLS)

LINE: WEIGHT 1 (DASH LINE)

TROUGH

SILO

1 X 60 O PC

IL=1234.67

2.0 X 3.0 BC

IL=1234.67

21

22

LINE: WEIGHT 1 (DASH LINE)


DRAFTTITLE

SINGLE TRACK

SIGNALS

GATELINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0



LINE: WEIGHT 1



LINE: WEIGHT 1

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.10


FENCING:

ANNOTATE TYPE OF FENCE

STANDARD FENCE

SECURITY FENCE

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

SYMBOL1:1000


TO

TO TO

TO

LEFT RAIL

RIGHT RAIL

SIGNAL

ANNOTATE TYPE OF FENCE


RAILWAYS, ETC


DRAFTTO TON1/21

TO TON1/21

AND CONCRETE FURROW

GUARDRAIL,CURBING

GRAVEL SHOULDERS

TARRED ROAD:

FREEWAY WITH PAVED SHOULDERS

TARRED ROAD:

TITLE

ROADS

LINE: WEIGHT 1


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1


LINE: WEIGHT 2

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.9

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.1

1


GUARDRAIL

CURBING

CONCRETE FURROW

LINE: WEIGHT 2

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 0

SIDE DRAIN

CURB

GUARD RAIL

GUARD RAILCURB

SIDE DRAIN

EDGE OF TAR


SYMBOL


SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW


DRAFTFOOTPATH

GRAVEL ROAD

TITLE

ROADS

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.1

2


GRAVEL SHOULDER

REMAINS OF ROAD

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 3

TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTHSCREEN COLOURS1:1000

SYMBOL


DRAFTTITLE

ROADS

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.13


600

0P

IP

E

PIPE750 0

OV

ER

HE

AD

S

IGN

BO

AR

D

SIG

NB

OA

RD

OV

ER

HE

AD

OV

ER

HE

AD

SIG

NB

OA

RD

MANHOLE, CATCHPIT AND PIPELINE

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE STYLE:2


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE STYLE:2


SYMBOL1:1000



TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5CLEARANCE HEIGHT : 8.4m

CLEARANCE HEIGHT : 8.4m

SERVICE: SW AS28

INVERT LEV: 337.071

COVER LEV: 339.131

CHAMBER:890X900

HEIGHT:2.060


OVERHEAD SIGNBOARDS/GANTRIES


DRAFTU/C R

CP

MH

WINDMILL

MONUMENT (DESCRIBE)

MANHOLE

OR RUIN

BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION

TITLE

MISELLANEOUS

LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.1

4



SYMBOL


CATCH PIT

DESCRIPTION TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5


DRAFTBH

WT

FUEL TANK

WATER TANK

WELL

BOREHOLE

FOUNTAIN

TITLE

TOPOGRAPHY


LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.1

5

FN



SYMBOL


FT

W


DRAFTBOTRIVER

HKFL

CANAL

RESRES RES

TITLE

RIVER BANKS

RIVERS AND STREAMS

WATER COURSES

HIGHEST KNOWN

FLOOD LEVEL

RESERVOIRSSHOW ACTUAL SHAPE

AND DESCRIBE

STATE DATE OF FLOOD AND

SOURCE OF INFORMATION

PERENNIAL / SEASONAL

TOPOGRAPHY

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 1


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1


AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.16


LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 0

INDICATE DIRECTION

OF FLOW AND DESCRIBE

SYMBOL1:1000


LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 1


TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5CANALS


DRAFTTITLE

DAMS

LAKES

PANS

CLIFF

DONGA WITH ROCK CHECKS

TOPOGRAPHY

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.1

7


LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 3

LINE STYLE 2

PERMANENT DRY


SYMBOL


LINE: WEIGHT 0


DRAFT1105

1100

01020304

510

500

02

04

06

08

1525

1500

05

10

15

20

TITLE

WALLS

(DRY STONE)

TOPOGRAPHY

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1


AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.18


WALLS

(BRICK,CONCRETE,MASONRY)LINE: WEIGHT 1

RETAINING WALLS

(BRICK,CONCRETE,MASONRY,STONE)

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 0


LINE STYLE 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE STYLE 0

SYMBOL1:1000





CONTOURS (1M INTERVALS)




DRAFT600

02

SAND/PROSPECTING PIT

SURFACE EROSION

CONTOURS IN A DEPRESSION

TITLE

TOPOGRAPHY

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.1

9


LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 5

LINE: WEIGHT 0


SYMBOL


EROSION

PROSPECTING PIT





DRAFTTITLE

CUTTING

EMBANKMENT

QUARRY OR DUMPLINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

TOPOGRAPHY

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.2

0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 2

LINE STYLE 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE STYLE 0

LINE STYLE 2

SINKHOLE

NATURAL EMBANKMENT

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE STYLE 0

LINE: WEIGHT 1

LINE STYLE 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE STYLE 2



SYMBOL


TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5APPROPRIATELY

DESCRIBE


DRAFTTITLE

ROCK OUTCROP

SCATTERED ROCK

SOLID ROCK

GRAVE YARD

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

TOPOGRAPHY

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.2

1


CENTRE OF THE GRAVE

INDICATES POSITION OF THE

INTERSECTION OF CROSS

GRAVE:


SYMBOL



DRAFTVEGETATION

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

DENSE BUSH

MEDIUM DENSE BUSH

TITLE

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.22


TH =TEXT HEIGHT HT TW = TEXT WIDTH

SCATTERED BUSH

SYMBOL1:1000

SCREEN COLOURS


DRAFT

PLANTATION

(STATE TYPE OF TREE)

IRRIGATED CULTIVATION

TITLE

VEGETATION

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.23


TH =TEXT HEIGHT HT TW = TEXT WIDTH

LINE STYLE 1

LINE STYLE 1

SYMBOL1:1000

SCREEN COLOURS



DRAFTCULTIVATION

ORCHARD OR VINEYARD

OR VINEYARD

IRRIGATED ORCHARD

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

TITLE

VEGETATION

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.2

4


LINE STYLE 1

LINE STYLE 1

LINE STYLE 1


SYMBOL



DRAFT

FOREST

SINGLE ROW OF TREES

AVENUE

HEDGE

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

TITLE

VEGETATION

AN

NE

XU

RE

21

.25

LINE STYLE 1

LINE STYLE 0

WEIGHT & LETTER SIZESYMBOL1:1000


SINGLE TREE


DRAFTVEGETATION

TITLE

MARSHLINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

AN

NE

XU

RE 2

1.2

6

LINE STYLE 1

LINE STYLE 1



SYMBOL


REEDS


DRAFTS

TAP

V

FH

LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0



LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0


LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

LINE: WEIGHT 0

DESCRIPTION

ROADS

TITLE

KM DISTANCE MARKERS

GENERAL SIGN POST

TAP

VALVE

FIRE HYDRANT

RADIO MAST

AN

NE

XU

RE

21.2

7


SIGN POST

SINGLE

SB



TRAFFIC SIGNALS

SYMBOL1:1000


(( ))

DOT AT BOTTOM OF SIGN

INDICATES THE SURVEYED POSITION







CIRCLE REPRESENTS SURVEYED

POSITIONS OF SIGN POST POLE

DOUBLE POST

20.29

km

SP

CIRCLE REPRESENTS SURVEYED

POSITIONS OF SIGN BOARD POLES


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 22

CULVERT SCHEDULE

Survey Project: ................................................................... Project Description: .................................................................. Surveyed by: .................................................................. Date surveyed: ..................................................................

CULVERT NO. CO-ORDINATES CULVERT SIZE

& TYPE PHOTO

NUMBER REMARKS Y X INVERT LEVEL

1L 65248.95 2896044.76 1642.323 1500 X 1200 BC

1R 65244.81 2896052.76 1642.362

2L 65289.75 2895973.93 1644.558 900mm PC

2R 65288.59 2895973.44 1644.573

3L 65293.78 2895972.72 1644.389 450mm PC

3R 65071.32 2895863.32 1642.396

4L 63387.99 2895083.74 1601.332 750mm PC

4R 62993.53 2895217.33 1594.777

ANNEXURE 22


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 23

COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: ……………………….…………………….…….......

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ……………………………………………………………………

I, the undersigned, being the duly authorized representative of the appointed survey company

on the above project, hereby warrant that:

1. All information as required by the project specifications have been supplied in full.

2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements

and specifications and the relevant quality control check list(s) have been supplied in full.

3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this

project.

Signed at ……………………….. this ……………. day of ……………………………………

___________________________ _________________________

Signed Name

PLATO Registration Number: ………………………………...……………..

For and on behalf of: (Survey Company) ……………………………………..

Note: The compliance certificate has to be submitted with the submission of the survey data and shall be bound in the job file.


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 24

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST

ANNEXURE 24.1 Topographical ground surveys

ANNEXURE 24.2 Topographical photogrammetric surveys

ANNEXURE 24.3 Laser scanning (mobile)

ANNEXURE 24.4 Laser scanning (stationary)

ANNEXURE 24.5 Bridge structural surveys

ANNEXURE 24.6 Culvert structural surveys


DRAFT

Page 1 of 8

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TOPOGRAPHICAL GROUND SURVEYS

SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: ……………………………………………………….. DATE: …………...……….

SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ………………………………………………………. REPORT NO: ……...…………….

JOB NUMBER: ……………………………………………………….

I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against and complies with the project specifications and TMH11 survey

requirements as stated in the survey instruction/contract documents.

The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction are marked as N/A.

SOME OF THE MOST IMPORANT REQUIREMENTS

Note: Not all requirements have been listed

Confirmation by a

registered Surveyor

1. PERMANENT SURVEY CONTROL

1.1 Were the permanent survey control observations and coordinates submitted to the Client for approval prior

to acceptance?

1.2 Was a final coordinate list supplied in Excel and hard copy formats for approval?

1.3 Did the final coordinate list conform to the requirements?

1.4 Were the beacons numbered correctly?

1.5 Was the final coordinate list signed by a registered Surveyor?

1.6 Did the positions (locations) of the permanent control meet the requirements?

1.7 Was the spacing of the control beacons correct in terms of the requirements?

(normally 300m for Road surveys – see specifications for bridge site surveys)

1.8 Did the fixing of the permanent beacons (horizontal and vertical) adhere to normal survey practice and

standards?

AN

NE

XU

RE

1

9

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1


DRAFT

Page 2 of 8

1.9 Did the accuracy meet the requirements?

1.10 Were the heights based on correct datum and was the datum height determined correctly?

1.11 Was the height datum point number and height shown on the coordinate list?

1.12 Were the calibration results between beacons for horizontal fixing submitted?

1.13 Can the calibration results be accepted?

1.14 Were the level comparisons between levels and check levels as well as the actual and allowable closing

errors supplied?

1.15 Were the independent height checks by GPS observation supplied?

Did the independent GPS height checks conform to the requirements?

1.16 Did the level accuracies between level and check levels adhere to TMH11 requirements?

1.17 Did the level closure between terminal points adhere to TMH11 requirements?

1.18 What percentage of height differences between level and check exceeds

5mm?

Note: Acceptable if not more than 5% exceeds 5mm and 0% exceeds

10mm

0 – 5mm

%

% > 10mm

1.19 Were the raw survey data supplied for fixing PRMs?

1.20 Was the process of fixing control in position and elevation fully discussed in the survey report?

1.21 General Comments on the Fixing of Permanent Survey Control:

2. VERIFICATION OF PERMENT SURVEY CONTROL

2.1 Were the verification report, results and the recommendations by the Surveyor submitted to the Client prior

to acceptance of the values?

2.2 Was a permanent beacon condition report submitted prior to final acceptance?

2.3 Did both reports form part of the final submission to the Client on completion?

2.4 Was the raw survey data supplied for the verification survey?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 3 of 8

2.5 Was the verification of permanent survey control in accordance with TMH11 and the project

specifications?

2.6 General comments on the Verification of Permanent Survey Control:

3. DTM SURVEY

3.1 Was the road prism (toe line to toe line) surveyed using a Total Station?

3.2 Was the road surface surveyed using laser scanners?

3.3 Was the rest of the survey area surveyed using GPS?

3.4 Were maximum 10m spot shot intervals surveyed on the road prism?

3.5 Were the spot shots off the road prisms surveyed to a maximum of 20m intervals?

3.6 Were break lines correctly utilized?

3.7 Were cut and fills used as break lines?

3.8 Were the triangles in the culvert and bridges cleaned to give a realistic representation of the culvert?

3.9 Were the spot shot position, codes and heights shown in the 3D continuous model?

3.10 Was the decimal point of the spot shot also the position where the spotshot was taken?

3.11 Were the spotshot positions, codes and heights shown on three different layers in the CAD data?

3.12 Was the DTM supplied in:

DWG format as per specification (No 3D faces)?

DGN-TIN format as per specification (No 3D faces)?

Model Maker format as per specification?

Civil Designer format as per specification?

3.13 Could all the above files be opened from the source that was submitted?

3.14 Was the raw survey data supplied for the DTM survey?

3.15 Was the DTM survey in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 4 of 8

3.16 General comments on DTM Survey:

4. CAD WORK

4.1 Were the following supplied:

4.1.1 Continuous 2D drawing

Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DGN format (MicroStation)?

Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD)?

4.1.2 A0 Drawings

A0 drawing in DGN format?

A0 drawing in DWG format?

A0 layout key plan indicating all cadastral, permanent survey control positions and numbers, road

alignment and sheet layouts (The first sheet of the A0 range)?


Was a continuous 3D drawing in DGN format (MicroStation) supplied?

Was a continuous 3D drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD) supplied?

Was the DTM-TIN (triangles) supplied as a separate layer on the 3D continuous CAD drawings?

4.1.4 Survey codes

Was a list of survey codes and descriptions supplied?

Did the survey codes conform to the requirements in TMH11?

Was the survey undertaken using the supplied codes?

4.1.5 General CAD work

Has the extent been covered by the survey as specified?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 5 of 8

Was the culvert detail submitted in terms of the specifications?

Were clearance heights for all overhead services shown on the drawing?

Were clearance heights for all overpass bridges shown on the drawings?

Were the positions of bridge columns/pillars shown on the drawing?

Were Invert levels, ground levels and grid levels for manholes supplied?

Were photos of all road signs in hard copy and digital format supplied?

Were the road sign positions numbered on the drawings and on the photos?

Were major access roads and streets surveyed to the specified length?

Were access road destinations and street names shown on the drawings?

Were the positions and numbers of the permanent survey control shown on the drawing as a separate

layer?

Was the cadastral data submitted on the final drawings?

Does the presentation of the cadastral data on the drawings conform to the requirements?

Were all features on different layers as specified?

Were the layers named correctly?

Did the layers conform to the requirements?

Did the lettering conform to the requirements (size and thickness)?

Were the triangles and detail of cross-roads on a separate layer or drawing?

Were the correct symbols used in accordance with TMH11?

Were the lane markings correctly represented (Broken, solid, broken & solid lines)?

4.1.6 Project File – Were the following supplied:

Survey report hard copy?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 6 of 8

Survey report digital?

Final coordinate list hard copy?

Final coordinate list Excel?

Level comparison hard copy?

Level comparison Excel?

Test results Excel?

Verification report and results?

Laser scanning reports as specified?

All other deliverables as specified in the specifications?

4.1.7 Is the CAD work in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?

4.1.8 General comments on CAD Work:

5. QUALITY CONTROL BY THE SURVEYOR

5.1 Were the field and office checked A0 plans submitted on completion?

5.2 Were the corrections to the field and office checked plans transferred to all the final CAD drawings?

5.3 Were test cross-sections every 300m surveyed independently from the actual setup from where the survey

was done?

5.4 Were the 30m check points data and results submitted for laser scanning projects in addition to the 300m

cross-sections?

5.5 Did the surveyed check points represent the profile of the road?

5.6 Do the check results conform to the accuracy standards?

0 - 30mm (85%) on the black top?

0 – 150mm (85%) off the black top?

5.7 Was the quality control by the Surveyor undertaken in accordance with TMH11 and the project

specifications?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 7 of 8

5.8 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.1 submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?

(Only for use by the Client)

5.9 General comments on Quality Control by the Surveyor:

6. GENERAL COMMENTS

6.1 Was the project delivered on time?

6.2 Does the labeling of CDs conform to the requirements?

6.3 Does the naming of files and folders conform to the requirements?

6.4 Was a delivery note, showing all data submitted, supplied on completion and any other subsequent

submissions?

6.5 Was the version number of the data shown on the CDs submitted?

6.6 Was all the data re-submitted with the re-submission, after corrections or extension surveys have been

done, in order to facilitate deletion of the previous version?

Any other general comments not stated before:

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 8 of 8

I, the undersigned, being the representative of the appointed survey company on the above project, hereby certify that:

1. All information required in the project specifications is hereby supplied.

2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.

3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project.

4. All corrections as instructed in the previous report have been corrected and the entire survey project is re-submitted.

Signed at…………………………………..this…………………………………day of …………………………………………..

Signature: …………………………………………………

Plato Registration Number: ……………………………..

Name: ………………………………………..

For and on behalf of (Survey Company): ……………………………………………………………..

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.1

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 1 of 8

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TOPOGRAHICAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC/LIDAR SURVEYS

SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: ……………………………………………………….. DATE: ………………….

SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ………………………………………………………. REPORT NO: ………………….

JOB NUMBER: ……………………………………………………….

I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against the project specifications and TMH11 survey requirements as stated in the

survey instruction/contract documents.

The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction are marked as N/A

SOME OF THE MOST IMPORANT REQUIREMENTS

Note: Not all requirements have been listed

Confirmation by a

registered

Surveyor

1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

1.1 Was the aerial photography undertaken at the specified scale or GSD?

1.2 Did the photography effectively cover the area in terms of the specifications?

1.3 Did the forward overlaps and side laps conform to the requirements?

(Max 30% side lap and 60% forward lap)

1.4 Were the photographs cloudless?

1.5 Did the photo contact prints conform to the requirements (Not applicable to lidar surveys)?

1.6 Was the specified information recorded on the photo frame (Not applicable to lidar surveys)?

1.7 Was a flight plan submitted in terms of the specifications?

1.8 Was the film correctly indexed and submitted? (Not applicable to digital aerial photography surveys –

Annotation for lidar surveys shall be done on orthophoto prints)

1.9 Were two sets of contact prints submitted? (one clean set and one annoted set) (Not applicable to lidar surveys

- Annotation for lidar surveys shall be done on orthophoto prints)

1.10 Was a camera calibration certificate supplied?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2


DRAFT

Page 2 of 8

1.11 Was the analogue photo scanning done at 21 microns?

1.12 Were the scanned images supplied in TIFF/JPEG format and indexed correctly?

1.13 Was the scanned output for digital aerial photography supplied as 8-bit for black & white and 24-bit for colour

photography?

1.14 Were the sample images at the start, centre and at the end of the project supplied?

(Only for digital and lidar photography)

1.15 General comments on the aerial photography

2. PHOTO GROUND CONTROL

(If the establishment and/or verification of permanent survey control formed part of the photogrammetric survey

requirements then the check list for establishment and verification of permanent survey control in Annexure 24.1,

Items 1 and 2, must be added to this list)

2.1 Was aerial triangulation employed Yes/No?

2.2 Does the following aerial triangulation block adjustment residuals conform to the requirements?

(Not applicable to lidar and “push-broom” surveys)

Between Models On the Ground Control 2.3 Were all the permanent survey control points used as photo ground control to reference the photogrammetric

model?

2.4 Was the permanent survey control leveled heights used to model the geoid (applicable to lidar and “push-

broom” surveys)?

2.5 Does the photo ground control configuration conform to the requirements for:

Lidar surveys?

Push Broom technology?

Conventional photogrammetry:

2 Model bases apart for a single strip?

4 Points in the corner of each model for full control?

3 Model bases apart in a block?

2.6 Were the field annotated aerial photographs/prints of orthophotos supplied on completion?

2.7 Were the annotations transferred to the CAD drawings?

2.8 General comments on photo ground control

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 3 of 8

3. DTM SURVEY – PHOTOGRAMMETRIC

(All types of survey methods except when otherwise indicated)

3.1 Was the maximum 20m spotshot interval observed?

(Applicable to conventional photogrammetric mapping)

3.2 Were break lines correctly utilized?

3.3 Were cut and fills used as break lines?

3.4 Were the triangles in the culvert and bridges cleaned to give a realistic representation of the culvert?

3.5 Were the spotshot positions and heights shown on the 3D continuous model?

(Not applicable to lidar surveys)

3.6 Were the decimal points of the spotshots also the positions where the spotshots were taken?

3.7 Were the spotshot positions and heights shown on two different layers?

(Not applicable to lidar surveys)

3.8 Was the DTM supplied in:

DWG-TIN format as per specification (No 3D faces) (Separate CAD file)?

DGN-TIN format as per specification (No 3D faces) (Separate CAD file)?

Model Maker format as per specification?

Civil Designer format as per specification?

3.9 Could all the above files be opened on the CD, DVD or hard drive that was submitted?

3.10 Is the DTM survey in accordance with TMH11 and the contract specifications?

3.11 Was the DTM data set broken up into different workable size files?

3.12 Did the triangles in the broken up files match with the adjacent triangles when the files were attached?

3.13 General comments on DTM survey – photogrammetric

4. SPLICING OF GROUND SURVEY INTO THE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY

4.1 Were the TIN and detail spliced into the photogrammetric model as requested?

4.2 Were under and over passes spliced with the emphasis on different levels?

4.3 Were the final contours generated after splicing?

4.4 Was all ground survey detail spliced into the photogrammetric mapping?

4.5 Were the spliced triangles shown in a different color to the photogrammetric triangles?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 4 of 8

4.6 General comments on splicing of ground survey

5. CAD WORK

5.1 Were the following supplied:


Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DGN format (MicroStation)?

Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD)?

5.1.2 A0 Drawings

A0 drawing in DGN format?

A0 drawing in DWG format?

A0 layout key plan (first sheet of the A0 range of sheets) indicating all cadastral, permanent survey control

positions and numbers, road alignment and sheet layouts?


Continuous 3D drawing in DGN format (MicroStation)?

Continuous 3D drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD)?

Were the DTM-TIN (triangles) supplied as a separate layer on the 3D continuous CAD drawings?

Was the continuous model broken up into realistic usable sizes to be used in an average computer?

Did the matching between the broken up models form a complete continuous model when attached?

Were the photos of all road signs supplied in hard copy and digital format?

Were the photo positions of the road signs numbered on the plans and on the photos?

5.1.4 Survey codes (Applicable to field survey work to support the photogrammetric work)

Was a list of survey codes and descriptions supplied?

Did the survey codes conform to the requirements?

Was the survey undertaken using the supplied codes?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 5 of 8

5.1.5 General CAD work

Has photo annotation been done?

Has the extent been covered by the survey as specified?

Was the culvert detail submitted in terms of the specifications?

Were clearance heights for all overhead services shown on the drawing?

(Surveyed by ground method)

Were clearance heights for all overpass bridges shown on the drawings?


Were the positions of bridge columns/pillars shown on the drawing?


Were Invert levels, ground levels and grid levels for manholes supplied and shown on the drawing (Invert

levels surveyed by ground method)?

Were major access roads and streets surveyed to the required length as specified?

Were access road destinations and street names shown on all the drawings?

Were the positions and numbers of the permanent survey control shown on the drawing as a separate layer?

Was the cadastral data submitted on the final drawings?

Were all features placed on different layers as specified?

Were the layers named correctly?

Did the layers conform to the requirements as specified?

Did the lettering conform to the requirements (size and thickness)?

Were the triangles and detail of cross-roads on a separate layer or drawing?

Were the correct symbols used in accordance to TMH11?

Were the lane markings correctly represented (Broken, solid, broken & solid lines)?

Was the CAD work in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?

5.1.6 Project File – have the following been included:

Survey report hard copy?

Survey report digital?

Final coordinate list for permanent control in hard copy format?

Final coordinate list signed by a registered surveyor?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 6 of 8

Final coordinate list Excel?

Level comparison hard copy?

Level comparison Excel?

Test results Excel?

Verification report on permanent survey control and results?

All other deliverables as specified in the specifications?

5.1.7 General comments on CAD Work

6. ORTHOPHOTO PRODUCTION

Note: All relevant deliverables applicable to the orthophoto production shall be evaluated under that specific

section in this check list

6.1 Was the following information shown in CAD format to be superimposed on the rectified image:

6.1.1 Title block as specified?

6.1.2 Grid lines as specified?

6.1.3 Cadastral information as specified?

6.1.4 Contours, contour values and spotshots as specified?

6.1.5 Permanent survey control points as specified?

6.1.6 Culvert information (size and inverts surveyed by ground methods) as specified?

6.1.7 Manhole and drain data as surveyed in the field as specified?

6.1.8 Destinations of roads shown on the drawing?

6.1.9 Clearance height of structures and overhead services?

6.1.10 All annotated features not clearly visible on the photos?

6.1.11 Underground services?

6.1.12 Fences where not clearly visible on the photos?

6.1.13 Kilometer Markers?

6.1.14 River and stream names?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 7 of 8

6.1.15 Canals and boreholes?

6.1.16 Type of crops?

6.1.17 Description of buildings other than residential buildings?

6.1.18 Cemeteries?

6.2 Were the rectified images referenced and cut in sheets to the same layout as for the CAD A0 drawings?

6.3 Were features that are not clearly visible/identifiable on the images annotated on the orthophoto?

6.4 General comments on orthophoto production control

7. QUALITY CONTROL BY THE CONTRACTOR

7.1 Were the field and office checked A0 plans/orthophotos submitted with the final data?

7.2 Were the corrections on the field and office checked plans transferred to all the final CAD

drawings/orthophotos?

7.3 Were test cross-sections data supplied and surveyed independently at 300m intervals?

7.4 Did the surveyed check points represent the profile of the road?

7.5

Did the check results conform to the accuracy standards?

0 - 200mm (85%)?

7.6 Was the quality control by the Surveyor in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?

7.7 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.2 submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?


7.8 General comments on Quality Control

8. GENERAL COMMENTS


8.2 Does the labeling of CD, DVD or hard drive conform to the requirements?


8.4 Was a delivery note showing all data submitted?

8.5 Was the version number of CD, DVD or hard drive supplied?

8.6 Was all the data submitted with the re-submission in order to facilitate deletion of the previous version?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 8 of 8




3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project.

4. All corrections as instructed in the previous report have been corrected and the entire survey project is re-submitted.


Signature: …………………………………………………

Plato Registration Number: …………………………………………………

Name: …………………………………………………

For and on behalf of (Survey Company): …………………………………………………………………………………………... AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.2

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 1 of 5

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LASER SCANNING

SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………. DATE: ..........................................

SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ………………………………............... REPORT NO: ..........................................

JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………….

Note: i) The surveyed deliverables for a survey undertaken by laser scanning shall be checked using the relevant

quality control check list for that specific survey

ii) This check list shall be used to check and verify that the laser survey procedures and requirements as stipulated in

TMH11 Chapter 14 have been followed




REQUIREMENTS Confirmation by a

registered Surveyor

1. SUPERVISION

1.1 Has the name of supervisory Surveyor been supplied?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.3


DRAFT

Page 2 of 5

1.2 Has the PLATO registration number of supervisory Surveyor been supplied?

1.3 General comments on Supervision

2. EYE SAFETY

2.1 Was written approval from the Department of Health, in accordance with their Radiation Control Program,

submitted?

2.2 General comments on Eye Safety

3. SURVEY CONTROL POINTS FOR LASER SCANNING

3.1 Is the laser scanner equipped with a compensator?

3.2 Was Point Cloud to Point Cloud registration employed?

3.3 Was the laser scanning control established at maximum 300m intervals?

3.4 For road surveys, were the control points for a dual carriageway established at both sides of the dual

carriageway?

3.5 For non-road surveys, was the control established in a 300m square grid covering the entire survey area?

3.6 Did any extrapolation take place during the scanning process (scanning outside the control configuration)?

3.7 General comments on Survey control Points

4. QUALITY ASSESSMENT PLAN

4.1 Was a quality assessment plan submitted to the Client prior to the scanning exercise?

5. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT ON COMPLETION

(This quality control is required over and above the quality control requirements stipulated in the various

chapters of TMH11)

5.1 Was the following information supplied:

Statistical systems report?

PDOP values during survey?

Comparison of elevation data from different runs/overlaps?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 3 of 5

Comparison of elevation data from overlapping (side laps) runs?

Comparison of points at the area of overlaps (end lap) where more than one base was used?

Statistical comparison of Point Cloud data and the 300mm check cross sections?

Statistical comparison of the final DTM and the 300m check cross sections?

Statistical comparison of adjusted Point Cloud data and redundant check points?

GNS accuracy report as per TMH11 Chapter 14?

IMU accuracy report as per TMH11 Chapter 14?

Control report to TMH11 requirements?

Statistical comparison of the final Point Cloud data and control points?

5.2 Was the Point Cloud filtered to one layer of points which represents the mean value of the scans?

5.3 Was the noise removed from the Point Cloud data?

5.4 General comments on Quality Control Report

6. GNS CONTROL STATIONS

6.1 Were the control stations spaced at a maximum of 15km apart?

6.2 Do any base lines exceed 7.5km in length?

6.3 Were control stations established at the start and end of the project?

6.4 Do the accuracies of the control stations adhere to the accuracy requirements as for permanent survey

control points?

6.5 General comments on GNS Control Stations

7. CALIBRATION OF THE EQUIPMENT

7.1 Were before and after data collection calibration results submitted?

7.2 General comments on Calibration of Equipment

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 4 of 5

8. TEST RUN

8.1 Was the test run data submitted?

8.2 General comments on Test Run

9. REDUNDANCY

9.1 How was the redundancy checked:

Two or more passes in the same direction?

Overlapping passes in opposite directions?

A combination of the above?

9.2 Was the side lap redundancy determined by a minimum of 20% of the pass width?

9.3 Was the time period between passes more than 1 hour?

9.4 General comments on Redundancy

10. SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTATION

10.1 Was all the documentation submitted on completion as per the document check list in paragraph 14.3.7 of

TMH11?

11. GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE MOBILE SCANNING EXERCISE

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 5 of 5



2. All field and office procedures have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.

3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project


Signature:…………………………………………………

Plato Registration Number:……………………………..

Name of Surveyor:………………………………………..

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 1 of 4

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TERRESTRIAL STATIONARY LASER SCANNING

SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………........... DATE: .........................................

SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: …………………………….............................. REPORT NO: .........................................

JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………..........….

Note: i) The surveyed deliverables for a survey undertaken by laser scanning shall be checked using the relevant

quality control check list for that specific survey

ii) This check list shall be used to check and verify the laser survey procedures and requirements as stipulated in

TMH11 chapter 14

PROJECT: …………………………………………...................................................................................................................

I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against the project specifications and TMH11 survey requirements as stated in the

survey instruction/contract documents.

The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction were marked as N/A.


registered Surveyor

1. SUPERVISION

1.1 Name of supervisory Surveyor

1.2 PLATO registration number of supervisory Surveyor

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.4


DRAFT

Page 2 of 4

1.3 General comments on supervision

2. EYE SAFETY

2.1 Was written approval from the Department of Health, in accordance with their Radiation Control Program,

submitted?

2.2 General comments on eye safety

3. SURVEY CONTROL POINTS FOR LASER SCANNING

3.1 Is the laser scanner equipped with a compensator?

3.2 Was Point Cloud to Point Cloud registration employed?

3.3 Was the laser scanning control established at maximum 120m intervals?

3.4 For road surveys, were the control points for a dual carriageway established at both sides of the dual

carriageway?

3.5 For non-road surveys, was the control established in a 120m square grid covering the entire survey area?

3.6 Did any extrapolation take place during the scanning process (scanning outside the control configuration)?

3.7 General comments on survey control

4. QUALITY ASSESSMENT PLAN

4.1 Was a quality assessment plan submitted to the Client prior to the scanning exercise?

4.2 General comments on quality assessment

5. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT ON COMPLETION

(This quality control is required over and above the quality control requirements stipulated in the various

chapters of TMH11)

5.1 Was the following information supplied:

Statistical systems report?

Statistical comparison of Point Cloud data and the 300 meter check cross sections for other surveys

than structures?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.4

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 3 of 4

Statistical comparison of the final DTM and the 300 meter check cross sections for non-structural

surveys?

Statistical comparison of adjusted Point Cloud data and redundant check points (30m check points)?

Statistical comparison of final DTM data and redundant check points (30m check points)?

Scan seam comparison of elevation data from overlapping scans?

Statistical comparison of the final Point Cloud data and control points?

5.2 Was the Point Cloud filtered to one layer of points which represents the mean value of the scans?

5.3 Was the noise removed from the Point Cloud data?

6. FIELD PROCEDURES FOR ROAD SURVEYS

6.1 Does any scanning setup exceed 120 meter from the previous setup?

6.2 Does any scanning distance exceed 70 meter?

6.3 Is the minimum overlap in scans 5%?

6.4 Are there any shadow areas that are not scanned?

6.5 Were a minimum of four (4) control points observed per setup when a scanner without a compensator was

used?

6.6 Was a report submitted on the referencing of the different scans?

6.7 Was a 2m x 2m grid DTM supplied?

6.8 Were breaklines utilized in the DTM?

6.9 Was the quality control report submitted as per TMH11?

7. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL SURVEYS

Note: The structural survey data shall be evaluated in terms of the structural survey check list Annexure 24.5

7.1 Were the scanned models geo-referenced to the permanent bridge control points?

7.2 Were the scanning observation distances limited to a maximum 70 meter?

7.3 Was a minimum 30% overlap achieved between adjacent scans?

7.4 Was a scan density of 5mm achieved at the bridge abutments, top of bridge piers and the bearings?

7.5 Was the remainder of the bridge structure scanned at a maximum interval of 10mm?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.4

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 4 of 4






Signature:…………………………………………………



7.6 Is the scanner equipped with a compensator?

7.6.1 If yes, were a minimum of two control points and at least one redundancy point observed per setup?

If no, were a minimum of four control points observed per setup?

7.7 Was the final Point Cloud filtered down to a single layer of points which represent the mean value of all the

scans?

7.8 Was the noise removed from the Point Cloud?

7.9 Was the Point Cloud data base submitted in ASCII format?

8. GENERAL COMMENTS

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.4

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 1 of 6

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR BRIDGE STRUCTURE SURVEYS

SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………. DATE: .................................

SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ……………….......………………….... REPORT NO.: .................................

JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………….

BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER: ………………………………………….

Note: The completed check list must be submitted by the Surveyor with his final submission




REQUIREMENTS Confirmation By The

Contractor

1. PERMANENT SURVEY CONTROL FOR STRUCTURAL SURVEYS

1.1 Were the permanent survey control observations and coordinates submitted for approval to the Client prior to

acceptance?

1.2 Were the beacons numbered correctly?

1.3 Do the positions (locations) of the permanent control adhere to the requirements?

1.4 Were the heights based on correct datum and was the datum height determined correctly?

(Survey control points for road structures are normally based on the control established along the road)

1.5 Were the calibration results between beacons for horizontal fixing submitted?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.5


DRAFT

Page 2 of 6

1.6 Can the calibration results be accepted?

1.7 Do the independent GPS height checks conform to the requirements?

1.8 Do the level accuracies between level and check levels adhere to TMH11 requirements?

1.9 Does the level closure between terminal points adhere to TMH11 requirements?

1.10 What percentage of height differences between level and check exceeds 5mm?

Note: Acceptable if not more than 5% exceeds 5mm and 0% exceeds 10mm 0 – 5mm

> 10mm

%

%

1.11 Does the accuracy adhere to the requirements?

1.12 Were the level comparisons between levels and check levels as well as the actual and allowable closing

errors supplied?

1.13 Does the final coordinate list conform to the requirements of TMH11?

1.14 Was a final coordinate list supplied in Excel and hard copy formats?

1.15 Is the height datum point number and height shown on the coordinate list?

1.16 Were the raw survey data supplied for fixing the PRMs?

1.17 Is the process of fixing control in position and elevation fully discussed in the survey report?

1.18 Is the permanent survey control in accordance with TMH11 and the contract specifications?

1.19 Was the final coordinate list signed by a registered Surveyor?

1.21

General Comments on the Fixing of Permanent Survey Control:

2. VERIFICATION OF PERMENT SURVEY CONTROL (IF REQUIRED)

2.1 Were the verification report, results and recommendations by the Surveyor submitted to the Client prior to

acceptance of the values?

2.2 Was a permanent beacon condition report submitted prior to final acceptance?

2.3 Do both reports form part of the final submission to the Client?

2.4 Were the raw survey data supplied for the verification survey?

2.5 Is the verification of permanent survey control in accordance with TMH11 and the contract specifications?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.5

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 3 of 6

2.6 General comments on the Verification of Permanent Survey Control:

3. 2D PRESENTATION AND SURVEYED DIMENSIONS

3.1 Were the following features surveyed and the levels, dimensions and other specified information submitted

and shown on the different 2D view drawing:

The total length of each span of each deck?

The clear span of each span of each deck?

The width and length of each support at top and bottom?

The depth of the deck?

The level on top of the footings (foundation)?

The position of the New Jersey barriers or any other balustrades or handles?

Levels on the abutment and piers?

Existing ducts and visible services through the deck?

The minimum vertical clearance and all levels and positions on the soffit profile?

The level and position at the start and end of each span of each deck?

The deck level at regular intervals (not exceeding 5m)?

The deck levels at each end of each span along all edges and centre lines of the decks?

The kerb levels at the supports?

The asphalt thickness at the kerb at the end of the spans on each edge of each deck?

The intersection angle or angle of skew relative to the river/road/railway line?

3.2 Were the co-ordinates and heights of all observed surveyed positions added to the 2D drawings?

3.3 Was a co-ordinate list of all the strategic points surveyed as well as the measured dimensions and invert levels

supplied in Excel format?

3.4 Were photos of the different views of the structure supplied in:

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.5

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 4 of 6

Hard copy format?

Digital format?

3.5 Were the photos annotated?

3.6 Were the results of the test survey submitted?

3.7 Are the results within the specified tolerance?

3.8 Was a survey report submitted?

3.9 Were the 2D view drawings submitted in AutoCAD format?

3.10 Were the 2D view drawings submitted in MicroStation format?

3.11 For conventional surveyed structures,

Was a list of survey codes and descriptions submitted?

Do the survey codes conform to the requirements?

Were the submitted survey codes used in the survey?

3.12 General Comments on 2D Presentation

4. 3D PRESENTATION

4.1 Was a 3D drawing supplied in AutoCAD format?

4.2 Was a 3D drawing supplied in MicroStation format?

4.3 Does the 3D drawing represent a combination of all the 2D views, giving an accurate representation of the

structure?

4.4 General Comments on 3D Presentation

5. GENERAL

5.1 Was the hard copy of data supplied as specified?

5.2 Was the survey undertaken by laser scanning?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.5

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 5 of 6

5.3 Was the quality control report for laser scanning submitted as per Annexure 2.4.4?

5.4 Was the point cloud of the laser scanning submitted in LAS format?

5.5 Was the survey report submitted in:

Hard copy format?

Digital format?

5.6 Was the compliance certificate submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?


5.7 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.5 supplied and signed by a registered Surveyor?

(For use by the Client only)

5.8 Were the office and field checked plans submitted?

5. Comments

6.

GENERAL COMMENTS


6.2 Does the labeling of CD, DVD or hard drive conform to the requirements?


6.4 Was a delivery note, showing all data submitted, supplied?

6.5 Was the version number of the data on the CD, DVD or hard drive shown?

6.6 Was all the data re-submitted after corrections or extensions were done in order to facilitate deletion of the

previous version?

Any other general comments not stated before:

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.5

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 6 of 6






Signature:…………………………………………………



AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.5

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 1 of 4

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR CULVERT STRUCTURE SURVEYS

SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………. DATE: ...............................

SURVEY PROJECT: DESCRIPTION ……………………………................... REPORT NO.: ...............................

JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………….

CULVERT STRUCTURE NUMBER / DESCRIPTION: ……………………………………......................................................................….





registered Surveyor

1. DRAWINGS

1.1 Were 2D drawings of both the front views of the culvert submitted in AutoCAD format?

1.2 Were 2D drawings of both the front views of the culvert submitted in MicroStation format?

1.3 Was a 2D plan view drawing of the entire structure submitted in AutoCAD format?

1.4 Was a 2D plan view drawing of the entire structure submitted in Micro Station format?

1.5 Were all dimensions as per Annexure 17 shown on the drawings?

1.6 Were levels surveyed on the top of both the head wall and shown on the drawings?

1.7 Were levels surveyed at the soffit below both the head walls and shown on the drawings?

1.8 Were levels surveyed on top of the deck directly behind both the head walls, at the inlet and outlet position

and shown on the drawings?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.6


DRAFT

Page 2 of 4

1.9 Were the invert levels of all openings at the inlet and outlet surveyed and shown on the drawings?

1.10 Were the dimensions and relative positions of the wing walls surveyed and shown on the drawings?

1.11 Was the perpendicular width of each ”opening” and each support at the inlet and outlet measured at the

top and at the bottom of the opening and shown on the drawings?

1.12 Were the positions of head walls relative to the centre line or staked line of the road surveyed and shown on

the drawings?

1.13 Was the angle of skew as per Annexure 27 shown on the drawings?

1.14 Was the extent of the concrete slab at the inlet and outlet surveyed and shown on the drawings?

1.15 Was a table of co-ordinates and heights of all observed surveyed points added to the drawings?

1.16 Was a co-ordinate list of all strategic points surveyed submitted in Excel format, together with the measured

dimensions?

1.17 Were photos of the different views of the culvert taken and submitted in:

Hard copy format?

Digital format?

1.18 Were the results of the check survey submitted?

Do the results conform to the requirements?

1.19 Was a list of survey codes and descriptions submitted?

Do the survey codes conform to the requirements?

Were the submitted survey codes used in the survey?

1.20 General Comments

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Was the hard copy data supplied as specified?

2.2 Was the survey undertaken by laser scanning?

2.3 Was the Point Cloud of the laser scanning submitted in LAS format?

2.4 Was the survey report submitted in:

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.6

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 3 of 4

Hard copy format?

Digital format?

2.5 Was the compliance certificate submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?

2.6 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.6 supplied and signed by a registered Surveyor?


2.7 Were the office and field checked plans submitted?

2.8 General comments on Drawings

3. GENERAL COMMENTS


3.2 Does the labeling of the CD/DVD’s or hard drive conform to the requirements?


3.4 Was a delivery note, showing all the submitted data, supplied?

3.5 Was the version number of the data on the CD/DVD’s or hard drive submitted?

3.6 Was all the data submitted with the re-submission in order to facilitate deletion of the previous version?

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.6

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

Page 4 of 4






Signature:…………………………………………………



AN

NE

XU

RE

2

4.6

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 25

WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORTS

ANNEXURE 25.1 Topographical ground surveys

ANNEXURE 25.2 Topographical photogrammetric surveys

ANNEXURE 25.3 Lidar surveys


DRAFTWEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT

(EXAMPLE FOR GROUND TOPOGRAHICAL SURVEYS)

Survey company: ......................................................................................................................................................................................

Project description: ......................................................................................................................................................................................

Survey Project number: .........................................

Reporting date: .........................................

Note: The survey phases shall be changed to suit the different survey instructions that were specified. This is an example for a seven week project:

SURVEY PHASE % COMPLETE WEEK 1

% COMPLETE WEEK 2

% COMPLETE WEEK 3

% COMPLETE WEEK 4

% COMPLETE WEEK 5

% COMPLETE WEEK 6

% COMPLETE WEEK 7

Establishment on site

Verification survey

Submission of the verification survey and report to the survey project manager

Fixing of permanent survey control: Horizontal Vertical

Submission of permanent control to survey project manager for approval

Detail contour survey

CAD work on detail contour survey

Office check on CAD work

Structural surveys

CAD work on structural surveys

Office check on structural survey

Field check cross-sections

Field check on final survey data

Final submission

Corrections completed

Project finalized

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

5.1


DRAFT

WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT

(EXAMPLE FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEYS)

Survey company: ......................................................................................................................................................................................



Reporting date: .........................................



% COMPLETE WEEK 2

% COMPLETE WEEK 3

% COMPLETE WEEK 4

% COMPLETE WEEK 5

% COMPLETE WEEK 6

% COMPLETE WEEK 7


Verification survey



Submission of permanent control data to survey project manager for approval

Establishment of photo ground control points

Aerial photography

Photo annotation

Field survey work as invert levels, clearance heights, etc.

Aerial triangulation

Mapping

Production of orthophotos

Splicing

Office checks

Field checks

Final submission


Project finalised

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

5.2


DRAFT

WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT

(EXAMPLE FOR LIDAR SURVEYS)

Survey company: ......................................................................................................................................................................................



Reporting date: .........................................



% COMPLETE WEEK 2

% COMPLETE WEEK 3

% COMPLETE WEEK 4

% COMPLETE WEEK 5

% COMPLETE WEEK 6

% COMPLETE WEEK 7


Verification survey



Submission of permanent control data to survey project manager for approval

Establishment of photo ground control points

Aerial photography and lidar survey

Photo annotation

Field survey work as invert levels, clearance heights, etc.

Line mapping if applicable

Compilations and office work

Compilation of orthophotos

Office checks

Field checks

Final submission


Project finalised

AN

NE

XU

RE

2

5.3


DRAFT

Sample form: Agreement between client and contractor

The sample agreement attached is generic and should be adapted to be site-specific.

REGULATION AND CONTROL OF CONTRACTORS

IN REGARD TO CONSTRUCTION WORK

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT FRAMED IN TERMS OF SECTION 37(2) OF THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT

(issued to Principal Contractors and where applicable, Contractors)

This document is to be issued in triplicate to all Contractors. The Contractors and witnesses are to sign two copies, initial each page and return these copies to the Company.

I, the undersigned, in my capacity as the authorised office of, and as such representing the undermentioned contracting firm, hereby acknowledge that I have read the attached Regulations for Principal Contractors and Contractors, the contents of which I fully understand and I hereby agree to abide by these regulations in all respects. I acknowledge that I am a mandatory in terms of the Occupational Health and Safety act and agree to comply with the Act and Safety Regulations. To this end, I will comply in full with the Occupational Health and Safety Act and in particular with the Construction Regulations GN R1010 of 18 July 2003.

__________________________ __________________________ SIGNATURE NAME IN BLOCK LETTERS

__________________________ __________________________ WITNESS NAME IN BLOCK LETTERS _______________________________________________ NAME OF PRINCIPAL/AGENT __________________________ DATE Certified that ____________________________________ has produced to me proof of registration in terms of Section 80 of the Occupational injuries and Diseases Act or registration with a registered compensation Insurer. Registration/Certificate Number _____________________ Signed _________________________________________ Date ___________________________ PREAMBLE (Note that where the term Contractor is used in this document this shall also be taken to mean Principal Contractor where applicable.) These regulations have been compiled by ____________________________________________(hereinafter referred to as the Company) to ensure that all construction work carried out for or on behalf of the Company is performed in a safe and healthy manner and that the Occupational Health and Safety Act and Regulations, particularly the Construction Regulations, are complied with as far as is reasonably practicable. This agreement is drawn up as provided for in Section 37(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act and in signing these Regulations the contractor not only specifies adherence to the legal requirements, but also undertakes to comply with the same. *** Where Principal Contractors and Contractors require assistance in preparing this document, add the following paragraph***

ANNEXURE 26


DRAFT

It is essential that all Contractors are aware that they are bound by the provisions of the legislation and to assist you the following documents are attached. They set out basic requirements.

A matrix indicating duties and responsibilities of owner/employer/agents, contractors and their contractors, commonly referred to as sub-contractors;

An inspection checklist for use by owner/employer/agents, contractors and their contractors;

An abridged version of the Occupational Health and Safety Act; and

The required Health and Safety System that must be fully documented. Important: Where, in any documentation relating to this contract, reference is made to the Act, this shall mean the Occupational health and Safety Act of 1993, which includes all Regulations thereto, any Regulations made under the Machinery and Occupational Safety Act of 1983, which may still be enforced at the time of implementation of this contract, and all relevant safety standards as outlined in Section 44 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. The Contractor hereby indemnifies the Company against any liability, loss, claim or proceedings whatsoever, whether arising in Common Law or by Statute; consequent personal injuries or the death of any person whomsoever (including claims by employees of the Contractor and their dependents); or consequent loss of or damage to any moveable or immoveable property arising out of or caused by or in connection with the execution of the Contractor’s contract with the Company. The contractor agrees:

To ensure all employees receive the necessary training before commencing work and carry such proof of training with them.

To ensure provision of welfare facilities as per Construction Regulation 28.

To provide the client with a fully documented Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) plan and specifications.

To provide risk assessments, safe work procedures and method statements.

To provide first aid facilities and first aiders as per General Safety Regulations.

To comply with the hazardous chemical substance regulations and where applicable lead and asbestos regulations.

To comply with environmental requirements as per the environmental impact study and the environmental regulation for workplaces.

To keep on site the written appointment for supervision of construction work.

To provide written designation of health and safety representatives and minutes of all meetings, whether site or separate, regarding occupational health and safety.

To provide all legal safety and health documents and registers as required by the Act and Regulations, including a copy of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

To comply with Construction Regulation 22, Electrical Machinery Regulations, and Electrical Installation Regulations regarding temporary electrical installations on site.

To comply with Construction Regulations relating to construction vehicles.

To prepare a fully documented fall protection plan.

To comply with General Safety Regulation 2 regarding protective clothing and equipment.

To report all incidents and accidents and occupational diseases as per Section 24 of the OHS Act and Regulation 6 of the General Administrative Regulations.

To comply with the General Safety Regulations – Sections 5 and 9 – concerning confined spaces and welding, flame cutting and/or soldering.

This should be read in conjunction with Construction Regulation 27 regarding the appropriate measures to be taken to avoid the risk of fire and explosion (see Construction Regulation 27).

To ensure that when using or erecting support or form work, scaffolding and ladders, he complies with Construction Regulation 10 and others.

That good housekeeping be done, including monitoring of stacking and storage and temporary storage of flammable materials as per Construction Regulations 25 and 26.

That where explosive power tools are used, correct training is given, registers kept and precautions exercised.

That excavation work is done in accordance with Construction Regulation 11.

That blasting is done in accordance with the explosive regulations.

That demolition work is done in accordance with Construction Regulation 12.

That hoists, suspended platforms and boatswain’s chairs comply with the Construction Regulation requirements.

That when erecting or using scaffolding, in addition to the Construction Regulation requirements, SANS code 85 is complied with.

The Contractor undertakes to carry out his obligations as required by law for the construction work to be carried out. These regulations shall not be deemed to relieve Contractors of any other civil, legal or statutory liability or obligation, or to waive or modify such other liability or obligation. Signed at ________________________________________ on _______________________________. Client’s agent _____________________________________ Principal Contractor/Contractor


DRAFT

ANNEXURE 27

EXAMPLE OF ANGLE OF SKEW

CASE 1

TWO STRAIGHTS

CASE 2

CASE 3

CASE 4

A CURVE AND A STRAIGHT

TWO CURVES

RIVER CROSSINGS

ONE CL

CL

OT

HER

S

KE

W

AN

GL

E

OF

ONE CL

OTHER S

KE

W

AN

GL

E

OF

S

KE

W

AN

GL

E

OF

CL

TA

NGE

NT

CL

S

KE

W

AN

GL

E

OF

CL

TA

NGE

NT

TANGENT

ONE

OT

HER

FL

OW

DIRECTI

ON

OF

CHAINAGE INCREASE

DIRECTI

ON

OF FL

OW

SKEW

ANGLE OF


annexure 1 guideline framework for the compilation … · guideline framework for the compilation...

Documents