annual evaluation report 2016
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Annual Evaluation Report 2016
WFP Office of Evaluation
Executive Board Annual SessionRome, 14th June 2017
Andrea CookDirector of Evaluation
![Page 2: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Annual Evaluation Report
PART 1: Synthesized findings from evaluations & overarching lessons, covering centralized evaluations of:
• Level 3 corporate emergency responses• Capacity development policy • Country-level operations
PART 2: Progress report on WFP’s evaluation function &performance against the policy outcomes
PART 3: Outlook for WFP’s evaluation function
![Page 3: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fin
din
gs
& L
es
so
ns
Le
ar
ne
d f
ro
m
Ev
alu
ati
on
s
![Page 4: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Overarching lessons for consideration by senior management
WFP emergency response: area of strength – plan for flexibility1
WFP strategic shift from implementer to enabler: ensure better integration of
emergency response & attention to hand-over & sustainability strategies
2
3 WFP a valued partner: important to achieve progress towards SDGs
4 Enhance needs assessments & strengthen systems for results
5 Attention required to gender in programme design & implementation
7 WFP staff capacity underpins the potential for success through IRM: longer-term investments in mobilizing WFP capacity for emergency is a priority
6 National capacity development: need for more coherent corporate strategy & tools
![Page 5: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Major developments in the evaluation function
Global Evaluation Meeting
Key PerformanceIndicators
Evaluation embedded intoIntegrated Road Map
Evaluation Function Steering Group
ContingencyEvaluation Fund
Regional Evaluation Officers
![Page 6: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
KPIs 2016
KPI 1: Progress towards coverage norms
![Page 7: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Country-level evaluation coverage
(evaluations completed in 2016)
![Page 8: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
KPIs 2016
Dashboard – KPIs 2-6
KPI 2: Expenditure
on evaluation
0.18%
KPI 3: SPRP
documents
79%21%
KPI 4: evaluation
recommendations*
66%24%
11%
* Percentages do not total 100 because of rounding
KPI 5: joint & inter-agency evaluations
CEDE
3 1
KPI 6: Quality of evaluation reports
2021: 0.8%
![Page 9: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Centralized Evaluations completed = 115% of 2016 plan
![Page 10: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
OEV work to strengthen WFP’s evaluation
function
Evaluationcapacity development
OEV’s DE help desk
Quality assurance system
Independent evaluation expertise
Outsourced quality support service for DEs
![Page 11: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Promoting the learning from & use of evaluation
IRM: OEV Reviewed 80% draft project documents &
CSP concept notes under WFP's Strategic Programme
Review Process
Synthesis reports (Top 10 lessons from evaluations on
policy quality, Operation Evaluations synthesis)
Design of an online Evaluation Community
![Page 12: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Engaging in the international evaluation system
Inter-Agency Humanitarian
Evaluations (IAHE) Steering Group
Rome-based agencies
WFP
FAOIFAD
![Page 13: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Resources for evaluation
Sourc
e:
OE
V, A
udited A
nnual A
ccounts
2008-2
015;
2015,
2016 &
2017 W
FP
tota
l contr
ibutio
ns a
re "
pro
jecte
d f
undin
g"
page 6
of
WF
P M
P
EB
.2/2
015/5
_A
/1/R
ev.1
.
Fig
ure
s e
xclu
de D
ecentr
aliz
ed E
valu
atio
ns
![Page 14: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Evaluation Outlook
QCPR
![Page 15: Annual Evaluation Report 2016](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd0f1007a8b1618c1b986f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Thank you