annual monitoring report 2008/9 - tameside · pdf filerequires greater manchester to supply...

December 2009

Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 - 2009

Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Planning and Environmental ServicesCouncil OfficesWellington RoadAshton-under-LyneOL6 6DL Tel: 0161 342 3346 Web: www.tameside.gov.uk/planning

3Introduction1

5Employment and The Local Economy2

5Recent Activity and Take-Up6Land Supply7Character of The Local Economy

10Employment and The Local Economy Output Indicators11Employment and The Local Economy Significant Effects Indicators12Employment and The Local Economy Contextual Indicators

14Housing and Population3

14Housing Trajectory15Population16Deprivation16Social and Affordable Housing17Housing and Population Output Indicators19Housing and Population Significant Effects Indicators21Housing and Population Contextual Indicators

22Transport4

23Parking Standards and Public Transport Journey Times23Transport Significant Effects Indicators24Transport Contextual Indicators

25Local Services and Retail5

25Local Services and Retail Output Indicators25Local Services and Retail Significant Effects Indicators27Local Services and Retail Contextual Indicators

28Conservation and The Environment6

28Conservation and The Environment Output Indicators29Conservation and The Environment Significant Effects Indicators31Conservation and The Environment Contextual Indicators

32Minerals and Waste7

32Minerals and Waste Output Indicators32Minerals and Waste Significant Effects Indicators33Minerals and Waste Contextual Indicators

Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council

Annual Monitoring Report 2008/9

Contents

34Local Development Scheme Monitoring8

34Development Plan Documents

35The Core Strategy and Development Management PoliciesDevelopment Plan Document

35Site Allocations Development Plan Document35The Proposals Map Development Plan Document35Greater Manchester Joint Waste Development Plan Document36Greater Manchester Joint Minerals Development Plan Document36Supplementary Planning Documents36Statement of Community Involvement37Saved Policies37Unitary Development Plan37Regional Planning Context38Resources38Review of the Local Development Framework39Local Development Documents Milestone Details

Appendices

42Sustainability Appraisal ObjectivesA

43List of IndicatorsB

43Local Development Framework Core Output Indicators43Tameside Unitary Development Plan Output Indicators44Significant Effects Indicators44Contextual Indicators

46Housing Trajectory FiguresC

49Saved PoliciesD

52AbbreviationsE



Contents

1 Introduction

1.1 The Tameside Annual Monitoring Report sets out progress on a number of topics thateffect the Borough. These range from the number of houses built, the employment landdeveloped to the state of our natural and built environment and the progress made withTameside's Local Development Framework.

1.2 The Annual Monitoring Report provides a snapshot of the situation at the end of March2009. The 2007/08 AMR suggested that this years data would provide a much clearer pictureof the impact of the recession. However, there still appears to be a significant lag as evidencedby the housing and employment land completions and as such it still does not reflect the trueimpact of the current economic situation. Some indicators however, such as unemployment,are showing a more immediate impact however. The picture should become a lot clearer in themonitoring report that covers the 2009/10 period when the down turn in the development industrybecomes more apparent in that monitoring period.

1.3 A number of significant changes to the indicators measured have also been introducedthrough the adoption, in September 2008, of the North West of England Plan Regional SpatialStrategy to 2021 (RSS). Under Policy L4 the level of house building Tameside should increaseto an annual completion level of at least 750 with 80 per cent of this on previously developedland.

1.4 There are similar impacts on the provision of employment land. Policy W3 of the RSSrequires Greater Manchester to supply between an additional 536 and 917 hectares of landduring the period 2005 - 2021. AGMA commissioned the Greater Manchester EmploymentLand Position Statement by Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners in 2009. This sets out in itsconclusions that Tameside may need to provide somewhere between 94 and 130 hectares ofemployment land over the period 2007 to 2026. However in Tameside the exact level of provisionhas yet to be finally determined.

1.5 This fifth Tameside Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) hasbeen prepared to comply with Section 35 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004,and Regulation 48 of The Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England)Regulations 2004.

1.6 The period addressed by the report is the 1st April 2008 to 31st March 2009. Where datademonstrates change that has occurred over the year (such as amount of floorspace developed)the figures relate to that period unless otherwise indicated. Where data relates to a snapshotduring the year (such as amount of employment land available), the figures relate to the situationat the end of the year (i.e. 31st March 2009) unless otherwise indicated.

1.7 The report provides data on a number of indicators:

Core output indicators are standard indicators defined nationally by the Department forCommunities and Local Government (DCLG) and include the housing trajectory;Local output indicators complement the core output indicators to monitor theimplementation of local policies and documents. These have been derived from theindicators set out in the Tameside Unitary Development Plan (UDP) adopted November2004;Significant effects indicators provide additional data to enable a robust assessment ofpolicy implementation with the core and local output indicators. They are linked to the


3Annual Monitoring Report 2008/9

Introduction 1

sustainability appraisal objectives and enable comparisons to be made between thepredicted and actual effects observed during the implementation of policies; andContextual indicators present background information on the context in which policiesare operating.

1.8 A framework of significant effects indicators is set out in our Sustainability Appraisal (SA)Scoping Report. Efforts have been made to collect data on as many of these indicators aspossible, and to establish a baseline from which to monitor change in subsequent AMRs. TheSA Scoping Repor t is available on the council 's web site atwww.tameside.gov.uk/planning/sa_report.pdf.

1.9 This AMR also contains the detailed progress made on the Local Development Documentsin the Local Development Scheme (LDS). It lists all of the titles of the documents and outlinesthe full production timetable for comparison, to comply with The Town and Country Planning(Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 parts 8(b)(i) and (ii) or (c)(ii). It shows progressduring the monitoring year and up to December 2009 with information regarding:

whether document preparation has commenced;the stage that the document has reached in its preparation;if the document's preparation is behind the timetable;the reasons for any delay; andan indication of the steps to be taken for the continued preparation or not of the document.

1.10 The report also shows which documents have been adopted with dates, except for theUDP, which for the sake of completeness, was adopted on 17th November 2004.

1.11 There were no local development orders adopted by the authority under section 61A ofthe Town and Country Planning Act 1990 in this period and no orders were revoked.

1.12 On the 18th September 2007, the Secretary of State for Communities and LocalGovernment in exercise of the power conferred by paragraph 1(3) of Schedule 8 to the Planningand Compulsory Act 2004 directed that for the purposes of all of the policies contained in theadopted Tameside UDP, paragraph 1(2)(a) of Schedule 8 to the Planning and CompulsoryPurchase Act 2004 does not apply. This means that all saved policies in the adopted UDPcontinue to be implemented until new policies replace them. At present, the Council is using allsaved policy as appropriate in the consideration of proposals.

1.13 UDP Policy H1 is the only policy with annual targets. This deals with housing landprovision and also contains the 80% target for construction of dwellings on previously developedland. During the 08/09 monitoring period, this target was not met as only 77.26% of new andconverted dwellings were on previously developed land. Housing land provision figures areprovided in Appendix C where detailed information on the housing trajectory can be found.

1.14 This report will be made available on our web site www.tameside.gov.uk/strategicplanningearly in 2010.



1 Introduction

http://www.tameside.gov.uk/planning/sa_report.pdf

http://www.tameside.gov.uk/strategicplanning

2 Employment and The Local Economy

Recent Activity and Take-Up

2.1 For the purposes of this Annual Monitoring Report, employment uses are classed accordingto Policy E3 of the adopted Tameside UDP as business (B1), general industrial (B2), storageand distribution (B8) plus sui generis commercial uses which have similar characteristics toindustry or storage. During the 2008/9 year, a number of employment generating developmentschemes were completed, taking-up 7.51 ha of land for employment purposes and creatingover 28,739.8 m2 of new employment floorspace (see Fig 2.1 below). Significant completionsinclude:

Nexus House, Greater Manchester Police office building , Ashton MossTameside Business Development Centre, redevelopment of business park with new unitsand office space, Windmill Lane, DentonSK14 Industrial Park, 17 industrial units, Broadway, HydeCrown Point South Industrial Park Phase 2, 7 industrial units, King Street, Denton

2.2 The proportion of employment floorspace completed on previously-developed land was61%. The most significant development on a greenfield site was the completion of GreaterManchester Police offices on Ashton Moss (which took up approximately 2.67 ha).

Figure 2.1 Employment Floorspace Developed by type 2008/2009

2.3 Since the end of the monitoringperiod, employment developmentactivity has continued with thecompletion of at least one othersignificant scheme - the FindelEducation Headquarters, Ashton Road,Hyde. Other development nearingcompletion include CharlestownIndustrial Estate, Turner Street,Ashton-under-Lyne.

2.4 During the monitoring year,permission was granted foremployment schemes totalling over15,846 m2 of floorspace on around 5.9ha of land, and further permissionshave been granted following themonitoring period. This is a notable decline since the previous monitoring year and is a potentindicator of the picture to come at the end of 2009/2010. However, noteworthy outstandingpermissions still include the following:

St. Petersfield Office Buildings K1 and K2, Stamford Street West, Ashton-under-Lyne;Large warehouse extension, Turner Bianca site, Globe Lane, Dukinfield;Office and light industrial development, Fairfield Clough South, Kings Road, Audenshaw;Three storey office block, Turner Street Industrial Estate, Denton;Mixed-use development, Goldgem site, Katherine Street, Ashton-under-Lyne;Office development adjacent to new Findel's office, Ashton Road, Hyde;



Employment and The Local Economy 2

53 modular industrial units at Raglan Street, Hyde; andThree office blocks, Tower Mill Site, Park Road, Dukinfield.

2.5 In addition the outline permissions for large scale employment development at Plot 3000on Ashton Moss and for various developments at St. Petersfield in Ashton still remain valid.

Land Supply

2.6 The total supply of land available for development for employment purposes in Tamesideon the 31st March 2009 was 71.22 ha. This is a reduction on last year's supply (74.19 ha).Thissupply figure consists of both vacant and redevelopment sites with planning permission andsites previously allocated. Sites are removed from the supply when development is completed.

2.7 The reduction in the available land supply can be explained by the removal of sitesfollowing an assessment of the employment land availability schedule. In particular the 7.84 hasite previously identified at Brookside Sidings, Guide Bridge, has been removed after informationfrom Network Rail which sets out the operational use of the area into the future. However, thereduction is not as significant as might have been expected due to a number of large clearedsites in E3 employment areas being added to the schedule.

2.8 The inclusion of a site in the available supply does not indicate any intentions of theowner(s) to offer the site for development so some of the supply will consist of sites not on theopen market and sites intended for development by owners or occupiers for their own use. Infact, of the total supply, 31.34 ha was classed as 'immediately available'. The sites in theimmediately available supply are listed on the MIDAS website and for sale on the open market.This is a large increase from the 16.62 ha recorded in 2007/08. It can mainly be explained bya number of large sites that have become available through the MIDAS website.These include:

Fairfield Clough South, Audenshaw - 2.7 haTower Mill, Dukinfield - 1.3 haFormer Toray Textile Site, Hyde - 2.5 haHyde Spinning Mill, Hyde - 3.7 ha

2.9 A breakdown of the different types of employment land in the available supply is shownin table 2.1 below.

Amount AvailableType

6.54 haB1

3.60 haB2

0.49 haB8

60.60 haGeneral (i)

71.22 haTotal

Table 2.1 Available Employment Land by Type

2.10 An analysis of the sites in the supply reveals that considerably less than half of the totalsupply has the potential to be genuinely available in a reasonable time frame, is of a serviceablequality and free from excessive constraints.

i The General category includes all development within the B use classes where the sites have not been individually identified as beingof one specific B use.




2.11 Although much development has been completed at the Ashton Moss StrategicEmployment Development Site, the 13 ha Plot 3000 remains available. This greenfield site issuitable for a variety of industrial uses and is the prime employment site as identified in theRegional Economic Strategy under Transformational Action 80 (ii).

2.12 There is more development this year compared to last but still not as high as in otherrecent years. Demand for employment land in Tameside continued but was not as strong as inprevious years. On 31st March 2009, approximately 2.31 ha of the previous years supply wasunder construction and in the 2008/9 year, permission was granted for schemes on 5.86 ha ofland in that supply.

2.13 The measured employment land supply has reduced steadily since 1995/96, when itstood at 190 hectares, to the level it is at today, 71.22 hectares. This indicates growing interestin Tameside's development sites, borne out by the number of sites where construction wascompleted during the reporting period. On this evidence it would have been imagined thattake-up rates were projected to increase but in the current economic climate this would nowseem to be uncertain. However, it is an indicator that under normal economic circumstances,Tameside is still considered to be an attractive location for developers.

2.14 With the advent of the current economic downturn there is the possibility that the life ofthe current supply will be prolonged. The employment land supply could even increase overthe period because of rationalisation and closures within local industries. Additionally the impactof business rates on vacant premises has already seen the clearance of some sites in theborough. This would appear to be more apparent since the end of the reporting year for thisAMR.

2.15 However, working on the assumption that the current downturn will not last beyond twoor three years, it is considered that this level of supply is not adequate in terms of quality oravailability. This position is backed up by the findings of the Nataniel Lichfield study whichconcluded that Tameside would require an employment land supply of between 94 and 130hectares for the period 2007 - 2026. Consequently it will become a critical issue for the evidencebase of the core strategy to investigate and to determine the employment land supply that willensure the long term development of Tameside's economy.

2.16 The Employment Land SPD has now been adopted and gives guidance on thedevelopment of employment land and promotes the recycling of existing employment sites fornew employment generating development.

Character of The Local Economy

2.17 The local economy in Tameside remains in a state of change with manufacturing industryin Tameside still contracting as part of a national trend and the proportion of manufacturing jobsin the borough decreasing every year since 1999.The borough still retains a significant proportionof its employment in manufacturing (19.3%) which is greater than any other borough in GreaterManchester where the average is only 11.4%.

ii This RES Action aims to deliver the designated Strategic Regional Sites as regional investment sites, knowledge nuclei or inter-modalfreight terminals.




2.18 This means that there remains a heavy reliance on industries that are likely to declinefurther in the coming years. Most of the older large manufacturing firms have ceased operationsin Tameside in recent years and the economy is now characterised by small and medium-sizedbusinesses. 83.9% of businesses in the borough employ 10 people or less.

2.19 When compared to the regional and national average the jobs density (ratio of total jobsto working-age population) in the borough is, however, low (0.62) which indicates that peoplecommute to find work. Although this level is still below the regional average the ratio hasincreased since 2003 when the level was 0.61. Tameside has around 6.1% (71,140) of allemployee jobs (excluding the self-employed) in Greater Manchester, despite having 8.28% ofthe working age population.

2.20 The rate of unemployment in Tameside based on the monthly claimant count showeda slight increase throughout the year. There were 3,460 claimants (2.6%) in April 2007 risingto 6,325 in March 2008 (4.7%). At the end of the reporting period the claimant count for Tamesidewas above the North West average (4.5%) and the average for the UK (4.0% at March 2008).See Figure 2.2 below.

Figure 2.2 Unemployment Rate (Resident Based Job SeekersAllowance Claimant Count) 2008/09

2.21 The unemployment gapbetween the average of the top threehighest and the average of the bottomthree lowest wards in the boroughacross the whole year 2007/8 was3.3%, down from 4.0% last year.

2.22 Tameside still has a significantlylower than average number of peopleemployed in occupations in theSocio-Economic Classification (SOC)2000 major groups 1-3, with a slightlyhigher than average number of peopleemployed in SOC 2000 major groups4-5 and 8-9 (see table below). Theproportion of people in Tamesideemployed in major group 1-3 hasincreased by over 3%. The proportion employed in major groups 1-3 and 8-9 have decreased.The only increase has been in major groups 4-5 and 6-7.

2.23 There has been a move away from using VAT registration data to determine the healthof the economy since the last AMR. The Office of National Statistics has moved to publishinga set of data for business demography as a means of giving a more detailed picture of businesshealth and entrepreneurship. Looking at the 07/08 AMR there was a net increase of 155 VATregistered businesses in the borough between January and December 2007. This means thatat the end of the year, there were 26.16 VAT registered businesses per 1,000 residents. Thepicture for the 08/09 AMR is somewhat different - based on using the new business demographydata there were 28.9 registered businesses (VAT registrations and PAYE) per 1,000 residents.The total number of registered businesses was 6,220.




GreatBritain(2008/9)

North West(2008/9)

Tameside(2008/9)

Tameside(2007/8)

Tameside(2006/7)

Tameside(2005/6)

Tameside(2004/5)

43.340.533.435.131.933.536.0Soc 2000 major group 1-3

15.614.911.812.810.611.613.1 1 Managers and senior officials

13.111.78.59.77.98.28.3 2 Professional occupations

14.613.913.112.613.413.714.5 3 Associate professional & technical

22.122.928.227.127.730.526.3Soc 2000 major group 4-5

11.412.114.712.615.316.814.0 4 Administrative & secretarial

10.710.813.514.512.413.612.3 5 Skilled trades occupations

15.816.517.316.118.317.717.0Soc 2000 major group 6-7

8.38.59.08.47.86.97.1 6 Personal service occupations

7.58.08.37.710.510.89.8 7 Sales & customer service occupations

18.819.720.921.422.118.320.7Soc 2000 major group 8-9

7.08.210.29.79.79.610.5 8 Process plant & machine operatives

11.311.510.711.812.38.710.1 9 Elementary occupations

Table 2.2 Employment by Occupation. Percentages based on all persons in employment. Source: Annual PopulationSurvey

2.24 Average gross weekly pay for full-time workers resident in the borough in 2008 was£437.50. This is lower than the average for the North West region (£451.30) and Great Britain(£480.00). However, this represents a significant increase (10.6%) on the 2007 average of£395.50.




Em

plo

ymen

t an

d T

he

Lo

cal E

con

om

y O

utp

ut

Ind

icat

ors

No

tes

2008

/920

07/8

2006

/720

05/6

2004

/5In

dic

ato

rR

efF

igur

es fo

r 04

/05,

05/

06 a

nd06

/07

rela

te to

form

er C

ore

Indi

cato

r 1a

. Fig

ures

for

07/0

8ha

ve b

een

upda

ted.

10,7

86 m

273

3 m

25,

770

m2

4,24

1 m

2N

ilB

1:To

tal g

ross

empl

oym

ent

floor

spac

e co

mpl

eted

- by

type

Cor

eB

D1

(i)4,

894

m2

4,87

9 m

214

,324

m2

1,28

6 m

21,

495

m2

B2:

1,34

9 m

246

0 m

23,

574

m2

6,87

1 m

233

,693

m2

B8:

11,7

10 m

216

,131

m2

Nil

Nil

Nil

Gen

eral

Em

ploy

men

t:28

,739

m2

22,6

63 m

223

,668

m2

12,3

98 m

235

,560

m2

Tota

l:F

igur

es fo

r 07

/08

have

bee

nup

date

d.8,

961

m2

-4,0

67 m

2N

/AN

/AN

/AB

1:To

tal n

et e

mpl

oym

ent

floor

spac

e -

by ty

peC

ore

BD

1 (ii

)4,

024

m2

-1 m

2N

/AN

/AN

/AB

2:

1,17

7 m

246

0 m

2N

/AN

/AN

/AB

8:

2,92

1 m

216

,131

m2

N/A

N/A

N/A

Gen

eral

Em

ploy

men

t:17

,083

m2

10,7

98m

2N

/AN

/AN

/ATo

tal:

Fig

ures

for

04/0

5, 0

5/06

and

06/0

7 re

late

to fo

rmer

Cor

eIn

dica

tor

1c. F

igur

es fo

r 07

/08

have

bee

n up

date

d.

1,53

7 m

273

3 m

25,

770

m2

3,50

9 m

2N

ilB

1:To

tal a

mou

nt o

fem

ploy

men

tflo

orsp

ace

onpr

evio

usly

dev

elop

edla

nd -

by

type

Cor

eB

D2

2,94

0.8

m2

4,11

9 m

23,

902

m2

1,28

6 m

21,

867

m2

B2:

1,34

9 m

246

0 m

220

9 m

22,

100

m2

7,18

8 m

2B

8:11

,710

m2

5,45

7 m

2N

ilN

ilN

ilG

ener

alE

mpl

oym

ent:

17,5

36.8

m2

11,4

34 m

29,

881

m2

6,89

5 m

29,

055

m2

Tota

l:A

men

dmen

ts to

the

empl

oym

ent

land

sup

ply

figur

e ar

e ex

plai

ned

in p

arag

raph

2.2

2.

6.54

ha

7.81

ha

5.67

ha

8.99

ha

16.1

8 ha

B1:

Em

ploy

men

t lan

dav

aila

ble,

by

type

Cor

eB

D3

UD

P 2

3.60

ha

8.60

ha

9.09

ha

13.8

0 ha

6.14

ha

B2:

0.49

ha

0.49

ha

1.70

ha

1.62

ha

2.97

ha

B8:

60.6

0 ha

57.2

9 ha

59.0

8 ha

58.4

7 ha

67.0

3 ha

Gen

eral

Em

ploy

men

t:71

.22

ha74

.19

ha75

.54

ha82

.88

ha92

.32

haTo

tal:

Fig

ures

for

07/0

8 ha

ve b

een

upda

ted.

3.37

ha

0.13

ha

0.38

ha

1.14

ha

Nil

B1:

Are

a of

land

deve

lope

d fo

rem

ploy

men

t pur

pose

s

UD

P 1

1.08

ha

1.29

ha

4.23

ha

0.32

ha

0.47

ha

B2:

0.98

ha

0.14

ha

1.04

ha

2.57

ha

10.0

2 ha

B8:

2.08

ha

4.09

ha

Nil

Nil

Nil

Gen

eral

Em

ploy

men

t:7.

51 h

a5.

65 h

a5.

65 h

a4.

03 h

a10

.49

haTo

tal:

Rel

ates

to la

nd p

revi

ousl

y us

edfo

r em

ploy

men

t (i.e

.Wor

king

site

s no

t nec

essa

rily

in th

e

0.1h

a3.

64 h

a2.

62 h

a9.

83 h

a4.

13 h

aA

rea

of la

ndpr

evio

usly

use

d fo

rem

ploy

men

t whi

chw

as d

evel

oped

for

othe

r us

es.

UD

P 3

supp

ly o

f lan

d av

aila

ble)

. Site

sar

e de

emed

to h

ave

been

lost

toem

ploy

men

t - g

ener

atin

g us

eson

ce a

ltern

ativ

e de

velo

pmen

tha

s co

mm

ence

d.

Tab

le 2

.3 E

mp

loym

ent

and

th

e L

oca

l Eco

no

my

Ou

tpu

t In

dic

ato

rs 2

004/

5 -

2008

/9




Em

plo

ymen

t an

d T

he

Lo

cal E

con

om

y S

ign

ific

ant

Eff

ects

Ind

icat

ors

2.25

T

hese

sig

nific

ant

effe

cts

indi

cato

rs m

easu

re p

rogr

ess

agai

nst

sust

aina

bilit

y ap

prai

sal

obje

ctiv

es.

For

det

ails

of

thes

e ob

ject

ives

plea

se s

ee A

ppen

dix

A 'S

usta

inab

ility

App

rais

al O

bjec

tives

'.

No

tes

Targ

et /

Rat

ion

ale

2008

/920

07/8

2006

/720

05/6

2004

/5S

ou

rce

Ind

icat

or

SA

Ob

jR

ef

Dat

a is

cur

rent

ly u

nava

ilabl

e fo

r th

is in

dica

tor

Num

ber

of n

ew b

usin

ess

star

t-up

s in

rur

al a

reas

5S

E 5

.1

Ove

rall

tren

d is

incr

easi

ng. N

ofu

rthe

r da

ta a

vaila

ble.

Incr

ease

N/a

5,11

04,

970

4,87

04,

705

VAT

Reg

s/D

ereg

s by

Indu

stry

Num

ber

of V

AT r

egis

tere

dbu

sine

sses

21S

E 2

1.1

Fig

ure

now

app

roac

hing

04/

05le

vel.

Incr

ease

33.4

%35

.1%

31.9

%34

.2%

35.8

%A

nnua

lP

opul

atio

nS

urve

y

% o

f occ

upat

ions

with

in'm

anag

ers

& s

enio

r of

ficia

ls',

'pro

fess

iona

l occ

upat

ions

' &

22S

E 2

2.1

'ass

ocia

te p

rofe

ssio

nal &

tech

nica

l' ca

tego

ries

Cha

nge

over

the

cale

ndar

year

. No

furt

her

data

avai

labl

e.

Pos

itive

incr

ease

N/a

530

465

530

510

Reg

sV

AT R

egs/

Der

egs

byIn

dust

ry

Cha

nge

in n

umbe

r of

VAT

regi

ster

ed b

usin

esse

s23

SE

23.

1

N/a

375

365

370

410

Der

egs

N/a

+15

5+

100

+16

0+

100

Net

cha

nge

Dat

a re

late

s to

the

head

line

GV

A p

er h

ead

at c

urre

nt b

asic

Incr

ease

-£1

8,02

7(2

007)

£17,

535

(200

6)£1

6,75

7(2

005)

£16,

178

(200

4)G

VA

Gtr

Man

ches

ter

ON

S D

ata

Gro

ss V

alue

Add

ed (G

VA

) per

head

24S

E 2

4.1

pric

es. D

ata

is n

ot a

vaila

ble

atth

e bo

roug

h le

vel a

nd-

£22,

172

(200

7)£2

1,24

5(2

006)

£20,

287

(200

5)£1

9,57

2(2

004)

GV

A S

thM

anch

este

rTa

mes

ide

is in

clud

ed in

the

Sou

th M

anch

este

r N

UT

S 3

leve

l. 20

07 is

the

mos

t rec

ent

data

ava

ilabl

e.

Act

ivity

rate

see

ms

to b

e qu

itest

able

.In

crea

se78

.9%

77.8

%78

.7%

78.5

%77

.7%

Ann

ual

Pop

ulat

ion

Sur

vey

Eco

nom

ic a

ctiv

ity ra

te a

s a

%of

wor

king

age

pop

ulat

ion

25S

E 2

5.1

Tab

le 2

.4 E

mp

loym

ent

and

th

e L

oca

l Eco

no

my

Sig

nif

ican

t E

ffec

ts In

dic

ato

rs




Employment and The Local Economy Contextual Indicators

Notes2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5SourceIndicatorRef

62.2% of the totalresident population

69,80069,50069,30068,700-MalesONS MidyearPopulation

Working ageresident population

Econ1

64,30064,20064,50064,300-Females was of working age inJune 2008.

Estimates(population on30th June) 134,100133,700133,800133,000132,500Total

78.9% of the workingage population is

57,10058,50059,00057,90057,000MalesONS AnnualPopulationSurvey

Economicallyactive population

Econ2

48,70049,50049,30049,00047,400Females economically active.Comparisons: NW74.5%; GB 78.9%105,800108,100108,300107,000104,500Total

Decrease to below2004/05 level. Data

N/a3.30%4.00%3.50%3.33%LPI EDU 1Percentageunemployment gap

Econ3

not recorded beyond07/08.

between theaverage top threehighest and bottomthree lowest wardsin the borough

Average householdincome has risen by4% since last year

£32,394£31,166£29,123£28,032£26,300CACIHousehold incomelevel

Econ4

There was a netincrease of 100 VAT

N/a26.1623.1822.2321.69VATRegistrations /

Number of VATregistered

Econ5

registeredDeregistrationsby Industry

businesses per1,000 residents businesses over the

year. Figures basedon stock at the end ofyear. This is nolonger recorded.

Comparisons: NW£451.30; GB

£437.50£395.50£382.40£382.50£355.20Annual Surveyof Hours and

Median averagegross weekly payfor full time workers

Econ6

£480.00.Tameside isEarnings -still lagging behindregional average.

ResidentAnalysis

11.8%12.8%10.6%11.6%13.1%Managersand seniorofficials

AnnualPopulationSurvey(Apr - March)

Employment byoccupation

Econ7

8.5%9.7%7.9%8.2%8.3%Professionaloccupations

13.1%12.6%13.4%13.7%14.5%Assoc prof &technical

14.7%12.6%15.3%16.8%14.0%Admin &secretarial

13.5%14.5%12.4%13.6%12.3%Skilledtradesoccupations

9.0%8.4%7.8%6.9%7.1%Personalservicesoccs

8.3%7.7%10.5%10.8%9.8%Sales & custservs occs

10.2%9.7%9.7%9.6%10.5%Plant &machine ops

10.7%11.8%12.3%8.7%10.1%Elementaryoccupations

Comparisons: NW0.80; GB 0.84

0.62(2007)

0.68(2006)

0.64(2005)

0.64(2004)

0.61(2003)

Jobs DensityJobs density (ratioof total jobs to

Econ8





working agepopulation)

Revised - based onsales for March of thereporting year.

£103,318£120,923£115,341£110,201£101,963Land RegistryHouse PriceIndex

Average houseprice

Econ9

Post ABI 2006 datais not directly

19.3%20.8%22.4%20.8%22.9%AnnualBusinessEnquiry

Proportion of allemployment inmanufacturing

Econ10

comparable toprevious years due to

83.9%83.3%82.8%82.9%81.8%AnnualBusinessEnquiry

Percentage of allbusinesses thatemploy 10 peopleor less

Econ11

changes in surveymethodology.

Relates to losses ofemployment landfrom the last year'ssupply

0.1ha7.28 ha3.88 ha1.11 ha3.94 haLosses ofemployment land inlocal authority area

Econ12

Relates to losses ofemployment landfrom the last year'ssupply

0.1ha7.28 ha1.53 ha1.11 ha1.37 haAmount ofemployment landlost to residentialdevelopment

Econ13

Table 2.5 Employment and the Local Economy Contextual Indicators




3 Housing and Population

Housing Trajectory

3.1 The graph below indicates Tameside's expected housing performance. It shows pasthousing completion rates, then projected completions for 15 years from 2009. It is intended toshow how the 'plan, monitor and manage' approach to housing delivery will work in Tameside.

3.2 The graph below, supported by Appendix C 'Housing Trajectory Figures' estimates theprovision of housing by adding together the allocated housing sites, sites with planningpermission, and the remainder of sites under construction. Then an estimate of the number ofsites likely to come forward as from Tameside's draft Strategic Housing Land AvailabilityAssessment is added. Finally, the identified supply is divided into the years that the supply willyield completed housing.

Figure 3.1 Tameside housing trajectory based on the RSS target of 750 net additional dwellings per annum

3.3 For each year, as the trajectory progresses, the accumulating over, or under-provision isdivided by the number of years left in the timescale. This is the time left in the trajectory to dealwith accumulating over or under-provision. The predicted level of provision by 2021 meets theRSS target although a slight decline in provision is expected in the residual period to 2024.

3.4 During recent years there has been a relatively high level of dwelling losses due todemolitions, causing a significant gap between the actual rates of housebuilding and net annualcompletions. During 2008/9, there have been 269 gross dwelling losses. During 2009/10 there




are likely to be 100 dwelling losses. Beyond that there appears to be little prospect of widespreadclearance and so a reduced estimate of 70 dwelling losses per year has been used for thehousing trajectory figures.

3.5 This housing trajectory updates those published in previous AMRs, and will continue tobe updated annually. As required, the current trajectory shows:

Net additional dwellings for the five year period 1st April 2004 to 31st March 2009;Housing delivery for the reporting year 2008-2009; andThe level of additional housing expected to come forward over the 15 year period up to2024, starting with the current monitoring year. Gross completions figures are shown andan allowance made for clearance and other losses.

3.6 See Appendix C 'Housing Trajectory Figures' for a comprehensive data table.

3.7 During 2009 Tameside carried out a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment(SHLAA), which will be the subject of public consultation in early 2010. Information from theSHLAA has been used in producing the figures rather than predicted windfall completions asin previous years.

Population

Figure 3.2 Population Density Across Tameside. Data source: Census2001

3.8 Tameside MetropolitanBorough is just over 103 km2 in sizeand has a resident population of215,500 giving an averagepopulation density of 2,092 personsper km2. Given that the borough hasdistinct urban and rural areas, thereis a wide variation in populationdensity.

3.9 The proportion of residentsfrom different ethnic minorities variesgreatly within the borough. In AshtonSt. Peters ward, the Black andMinority Ethnic (BME) populationaccounted for 24% of people in2001, whilst in the Longdendaleward, this figure was only 1.5%. There is a large Bangladeshi community in Hyde, and sizeableIndian and Pakistani communities in Ashton.

England & Wales %North West %Tameside %91.3194.4494.57White87.4992.1792.70British1.231.150.91Irish2.591.110.96Other White1.270.930.79Mixed0.460.330.31White & Black Caribbean0.150.150.11White & Black African0.360.260.24White & Asian0.300.200.13Other Mixed4.373.423.97Asian or Asian British1.991.071.45Indian



Housing and Population 3

England & Wales %North West %Tameside %1.371.741.22Pakistani0.540.391.17Bangladeshi0.460.220.14Other Asian2.190.620.27Black or Black British1.080.300.16Caribbean0.920.240.08African0.180.080.03Other Black0.860.600.40Chinese or Other Ethnic Group0.440.400.30Chinese0.420.200.11Other Ethnic Group

Table 3.1 Ethnic Composition. Data Source: Census 2001

England & Wales %North West %Tameside %71.7578.0175.54Christian0.280.180.13Buddhist1.060.401.36Hindu0.500.420.04Jewish2.993.042.52Muslim0.630.100.03Sikh0.290.160.17Other14.8110.4812.10No Religion7.717.238.11Not Stated

Table 3.2 Religion. Data Source: Census 2001

Deprivation

Figure 3.3 Index of Multiple Deprivation Rankings for TamesideSOAs. Data Source: IMD 2007

3.10 According to the 2007 index ofmultiple deprivation (IMD), Tameside isthe 56th most deprived local authorityarea (out of 354).This is an improvementfrom the 2004 IMD where Tameside wasranked as the 49th most deprived localauthority area. There are greatdifferences in levels of deprivationthroughout the borough. Although thereare a number of Super Output Areas(SOAs) that appear in the least deprivedcategories, there are also many that arewithin the 10% most deprived in thecountry.

Social and Affordable Housing

3.11 In total, 102 completed dwellingswere recorded, all in the social rentedcategory (none in the “intermediate”category). Of these, 83 were new-buildhouses and flats and a further 19 involved the conversion of 2 previous dwellings into a singledwelling. The larger sites were as follows:

2 four bedroom houses at Clifton Street and Kenyon Street, Ashton under Lyne - AshtonPioneer Homes;




38 houses (11 two bedroom houses - including 6 bungalows and 27 three bedroom houses)at Bennett Street, Fitzroy Street, Marlborough Street, Portugal Street, Pottinger Street andStockport Road in the west end of Ashton under Lyne - Regenda Group2 three bedroom houses at Waddicor Avenue, Ashton under Lyne - New Charter HousingTrust3 two bedroom bungalows at Cheritan Close, Hattersley. These were the first in a totalscheme of 8 bungalows, all completed later in 2009 - Peak Valley Housing Association35 two bedroom flats at Hawkshead Close and 4 four bedroom houses at Lake Road,Stalybridge - New Charter Housing Trust18 duplex dwellings from the conversion of 36 bedsit flats in Haughton Green, Denton. 6each at Fitzgerald Court, on keats Avenue; Castleton Court on Mancunian Road; andSouthley Court on Wordsworth Road - Irwell Valley Housing Association

3.12 There were, however, a significant number of losses of social and affordable housing(126 gross). 64 demolitions were recorded in Hattersley (Peak Valley Housing Trust). In HaughtonGreen, as well as 36 bedsit flats lost through conversion, a further 17 RSL dwellings wererecorded demolished (Irwell Valley Housing Association).

3.13 At present, social and affordable housing in Tameside can be expected to be deliveredby RSLs and not the private sector. UDP Policy H4 allows the Council to seek an element ofsubsidised or low cost market housing to be provided in conjunction with development proposals.Although this policy is not presently implemented by the Council, the situation is being keptunder review. A number of housing studies commissioned by the Council as part of the LocalDevelopment Framework evidence base may provide the justification for the Council tocommence implementation of this policy.

Housing and Population Output Indicators

Notes2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5IndicatorRefNew indicator - notrecorded prior to 07/08.

1/4/20031/4/2003Start of plan periodPlan period and housingtarget

Core H131/3/202131/3/2021End of plan period13,50013,500Total housing

requiredNorth West ofEngland PlanRegional SpatialStrategy to 2021

North West ofEngland PlanRegional SpatialStrategy to 2021

Source of plan target

New indicator - notrecorded prior to 07/08.See Figure 3.1 forgraphical Representationof data, and Appendix Cfor the comprehensivedata tables.

22722799-00Net additional dwellings -in previous years

Core H2(a)17217200-0126826801-0210510502-0351551503-0438338304-0568468405-0656356306-07789-07-08

New indicator -not recordedprior to 07/08.

652-08-09Net additional dwellings -for the reporting year

Core H2(b)

New indicator - notrecorded prior to 07/08.

45056509-10Net additional dwellings -in future years

CoreH2(c)(i) 75070010-11

90080011-12115088512-13125093013-14115093014-1588088015-1688088016-1788088017-1883083018-1983083019-2078078020-2178078021-2273073022-23


-12.709-10Estimated gross area (ha)of gross completions

CoreH2(c)(ii) 15.015.410-11




Notes2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5IndicatorRef20.017.411-1225.019.112-1325.020.013-1423.0-14-15


7507502003-2023Target for annual averagerate of housing provision(net of clearance)

CoreH2(c)(iii)

New indicator - Netadditional dwellingsexpected to comeforward over theremaining plan period

78979007-08Managed delivery targetCore H2(d)65270008-0956556509-1070070010-1180080011-12

(2007 onwards). Notrecorded prior to 07/08.

88588512-1393093013-1493093014-1588088015-1688088016-1788088017-1883083018-1983083019-2078078020-2178078021-2273073022-23

Former CoreIndicator 2b

77.26%75.3%80.9%84.9%79.2%Percentage of new andconverted dwellings onpreviously developed land

Core H3UDP 6


2Nil---Net additional pitches -Gypsy and Traveller

Core H4

Both unauthorisedpitches, then laterpermitted for 4 years.Former Core Indicator 2d102544844NoneAffordable housing

completionsCore H5UDP 7


Dataunavailable

Dataunavailable

---Housing Quality - Buildingfor Life Assessments

Core H6

921 Gross1164 Gross 675Gross

940Gross

574 GrossTotal number of newdwellings completed

UDP 4

Includes completions onany sites not identified for

736929399348126Number of dwellingscompleted on windfall sites

UDP 5

housing in the adoptedUDP 2004. New adjustedfigures.Figures in brackets arefor demolitions.

269 (154)368 (327)109 (73)248 (168)191 (116)Number of dwellingscleared,including tenure andoccupancy

UDP 8

126.8 ha138.1 ha141.6 ha140.2 ha152.5 haRemaining supply of landforhousing development

UDP 9

Table 3.3 Housing and Population Output Indicators




Ho

usi

ng

an

d P

op

ula

tio

n S

ign

ific

ant

Eff

ects

Ind

icat

ors

3.14

T

hese

sig

nific

ant

effe

cts

indi

cato

rs m

easu

re p

rogr

ess

agai

nst

sust

aina

bilit

y ap

prai

sal

obje

ctiv

es.

For

det

ails

of

thes

e ob

ject

ives

plea

se s

ee A

ppen

dix

A 'S

usta

inab

ility

App

rais

al O

bjec

tives

'.

No

tes

Targ

et/

Rat

ion

ale

2008

/09

2007

/08

2006

/07

2005

/06

2004

/05

So

urc

eIn

dic

ato

rS

AO

bj

Ref

Affo

rdab

le h

ousi

ngpo

licy

not c

urre

ntly

bein

g im

plem

ente

d

102

soci

al /

affo

rdab

ledw

ellin

gs c

ompl

eted

54 s

ocia

l / a

fford

able

dwel

lings

com

plet

ed48

soc

ial /

affo

rdab

ledw

ellin

gs c

ompl

eted

44 s

ocia

l / A

fford

able

Dw

ellin

gs c

ompl

eted

2 dw

ellin

gsbr

ough

t bac

kin

to u

se

Pla

nnin

gD

epar

tmen

tIn

crea

se in

affo

rdab

leho

usin

g1

SE

1.1

Eco

Hom

es h

as b

een

repl

aced

by

Cod

e fo

rIn

crea

se1

Eco

Hom

es r

ated

'Pas

s'an

d 1

Offi

ce r

atin

g of

'Ver

yG

ood'

.

4 E

coH

omes

rat

ed 'G

ood'

and

1 b

espo

ke'V

ery

Goo

d' c

ertif

ied

deve

lopm

ent.

1 E

coH

omes

'Ver

yG

ood'

, 1 O

ffice

ratin

gof

'Exc

elle

nt',

1 O

ffice

ratin

g of

'Goo

d'

Non

e1

Bes

poke

'Goo

d' c

ertif

ied

deve

lopm

ent

BR

EN

umbe

r of

BR

EE

AM

accr

edite

d bu

ildin

gs1

SE

1.2

Sus

tain

able

Hom

es fo

rne

w b

uild

dw

ellin

gs.

8 dw

ellin

gs c

ertif

ied

by th

eC

ode

for

Sus

tain

able

Hom

es

Red

uce

7% (01/

04/0

9)4.

76%

(01/

04/0

8)-

4.92

%(0

1/04

/06)

4.62

%(0

1/04

/05)

DC

LG H

ousi

ngS

trat

egy

Sta

tistic

al In

dex

Per

cent

age

of h

omes

unf

itfo

r us

e1

SE

1.3

Tam

esid

e lif

eex

pect

ancy

rem

ains

low

er th

an N

W a

vera

ge.

Com

mun

ity S

trat

egy

seek

s to

red

uce

deat

h ra

tes

for u

nder

75s

75.6

7 ye

ars

74.9

yea

rs74

.6 y

ears

74.1

yea

rsM

-

Nei

ghbo

urho

odS

tatis

tics

Life

exp

ecta

ncy

at b

irth

2S

E 2

.179

.58

year

s79

.8 y

ears

79.5

yea

rs79

.4 y

ears

F

-

No

new

dat

a. N

ext

Res

iden

ts O

pini

onIn

crea

se-

65%

--

58%

Res

iden

ts'

Opi

nion

Sur

vey

% o

f peo

ple

who

thin

kth

at th

eir

loca

l are

a is

apl

ace

whe

re p

eopl

e fr

om

3S

E 3

.1

Sur

vey

take

s pl

ace

in20

10/1

1.(D

ec 0

7 -

Feb

08)

diffe

rent

bac

kgro

unds

get

on w

ell t

oget

her

Red

uce

out-m

igra

tion

+1,

100

+/-

0+

300

+40

0M

idye

arP

opul

atio

nE

stim

ates

Net

cha

nge

in p

opul

atio

n4

SE

4.1

Pop

ulat

ion

data

from

2001

Cen

sus;

Red

uce

3.5

6%(I

MD

200

7)3.

56%

(IM

D 2

007)

3.56

%(I

MD

200

7)8.

03%

(IM

D 2

004)

8.03

%(I

MD

200

4)In

dex

of M

ultip

leD

epriv

atio

n (I

MD

)%

of p

opul

atio

n liv

ing

inS

uper

Out

put A

reas

6S

E 6

.1

depr

ivat

ion

data

from

IMD

200

4 / 2

007.

(SO

As)

ran

ked

by IM

D in

the

33%

mos

t dep

rived

due

to b

arrie

rs to

hou

sing

and

serv

ices

Pop

ulat

ion

data

from

2001

Cen

sus;

Red

uce

53.4

0%(I

MD

200

7)53

.40%

(IM

D 2

007)

53.4

0%(I

MD

200

7)59

.74%

(IM

D 2

004)

59.7

4%(I

MD

200

4)In

dex

of M

ultip

leD

epriv

atio

n%

of p

opul

atio

n liv

ing

inS

OA

s ra

nked

by

IMD

in6

SE

6.2

depr

ivat

ion

data

from

IMD

200

4 / 2

007.

the

33%

mos

t dep

rived

due

to a

ll fa

ctor

sIn

crea

se60

.6%

(sum

mer

200

8)55

.2%

(sum

mer

200

7)49

.8%

(sum

mer

200

6)51

.7%

(sum

mer

200

5)44

.7%

(sum

mer

2004

)

BV

PI 3

3P

erce

ntag

e of

pup

ilsob

tain

ing

5 or

mor

eG

CS

Es

at g

rade

s A

*-C

9S

E 9

.1

Dat

a is

from

Jan

-Dec

each

yea

rIm

prov

e le

vel o

fqu

alifi

catio

ns20

.7%

18.9

%17

.2%

18.7

%N

VQ

4 &

abov

eA

nnua

l Pop

ulat

ion

Sur

vey

Qua

lific

atio

ns o

f wor

king

age

popu

latio

n9

SE

9.2

40.1

%37

.2%

37.4

%36

.0%

NV

Q3

&ab

ove

61.0

%59

.1%

60.5

%58

.6%

NV

Q2

&ab

ove




No

tes

Targ

et/

Rat

ion

ale

2008

/09

2007

/08

2006

/07

2005

/06

2004

/05

So

urc

eIn

dic

ato

rS

AO

bj

Ref

77.5

%75

.9%

76.7

%75

.4%

NV

Q1

&ab

ove

7.2%

6.2%

4.6%

4.6%

Oth

erQ

uals

15.2

%17

.9%

18.7

%19

.9%

No

Qua

lsN

ew a

djus

ted

figur

esIn

crea

se3,

565

3,32

63,

021

3,06

12,

948

Stu

dent

s Lo

ans

Dat

abas

eN

umbe

r of

Tam

esid

ere

side

nts

ente

ring

high

ered

ucat

ion

9S

E 9

.3

No

chan

ge90

.8(2

008)

90.8

(200

7)88

.9%

(200

6)88

.8%

(200

5)85

.6%

(200

4)C

onne

xion

sS

choo

l lea

vers

ined

ucat

ion,

em

ploy

men

t or

trai

ning

9S

E 9

.4

Targ

et fo

r m

ore

effic

ient

use

of l

and

See

cor

ein

dica

tor

2cP

erce

ntag

e of

new

dwel

lings

com

plet

ed a

t(i)

Les

s th

an 3

0 dp

h(ii

) B

etw

een

30 &

50

dph

(iii)

Abo

ve 5

0 dp

h

15S

E 1

5.1

with

den

sitie

sbe

twee

n 30

& 5

0 dp

h

Incr

ease

No

data

70.3

70.3

71.5

70.5

New

Cha

rter

Hou

sing

Cor

pora

tion

Reg

ulat

ory

and

Ene

rgy

effic

ienc

y S

AP

ratin

g fo

r so

cial

hou

sing

18S

E 1

8.1

Sta

tistic

al R

etur

nsS

urve

yN

o da

ta73

59.7

--

Pea

kV

alle

yN

o da

ta-

86-

-A

shto

nP

ione

erN

o da

ta64

--

-Ir

wel

lV

alle

yF

igur

es a

djus

ted

from

prev

ious

AM

R.

Incr

ease

6370

7061

58D

CLG

Hou

sing

Str

ateg

y S

tatis

tical

App

endi

x

Ene

rgy

effic

ienc

y av

erag

eS

AP

rat

ing

for

priv

ate

sect

or h

ousi

ng

18S

E 1

8.2

Incr

ease

See

sig

nific

ant e

ffect

s in

dica

tor

9.2

Pro

port

ion

of w

orki

ng a

gead

ults

with

NV

Q4

orhi

gher

26S

E 2

6.1




Housing and Population Contextual Indicators

Notes2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5SourceIndicatorRefSteadyincrease.

105,300104,700104,600104,200104,200MalesMidyear PopulationEstimates

Total resident populationPop 1110,200109,700109,800109,600109,700Females

Figures215,500214,400214,400213,800213,900TotalAdjusted fromprevious AMRSteady increase2,0922,0782,0782,0752,072Midyear Population

EstimatesAverage populationdensity (persons / km2)

Pop 2

New adjustedfigures

98,60097,053(30/06/07)

96,912(30/06/06)

95,945(30/06/05)

95,693(03/06/04)

DCLG HousingStrategy StatisticalAppendix

Number of householdsPop 3

98,570(01/04/09)

97,885(01/04/08)

97,210(01/04/07)

96,912(01/04/06)

95,945(01/04/05)

DCLG HousingStrategy StatisticalAppendix

Dwelling StockPop 4

See Table 3.1-Census 2001Ethnic compositionPop 5See Table 3.2-Census 2001ReligionPop 6No new data 2.4Census 2001Average household SizePop 7New adjustedfigures

4.76%(01/04/08)

4.79%(01/04/07)

4.92%(01/04/06)

4.62%(01/04/05)

DCLG HousingStrategy StatisticalIndex

Percentage of homesunfit for use

Pop 8

Source adjustedNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneDCLG HousingStrategy StatisticalAppendix

Number of unfit homes insocial housing

Pop 9

Steadydecrease

No dataavailable

8.14%10.86%23.40%21.60%Community StrategyUpdate 2005

Proportion of socialhousing not meeting theDecent Homes Standard

Pop 10

New adjustedfigures

163(01/04/09)

70(01/04/08)

56(01/04/07)

28(01/04/06)

36(01/04/05)

BVPI 64Number of vacant privatesector dwellings returnedto occupation

Pop 11

New adjustedfigures

4.40%(01/04/09)

3.97%(01/04/08)

5.14%(01/04/07)

4.62%(01/04/06)

4.44%(01/04/05)

DCLG HousingStrategy StatisticalIndex

Percentage of dwellingsempty

Pop 12

1 = mostdeprived; 354 =least deprived

56 (IMD2007)

56 (IMD 2007)56 (IMD2007)

49 (IMD2004)

49 (IMD2004)

DCLGLocal authority areamultiple deprivation rank

Pop 13

See significant effects indicator 9.2% of population with noqualifications

Pop 14

See significant effects indicator 9.1BVPI 38% of pupils obtaining fiveor more GCSEs atgrades A* - C

Pop 15

See significant effects indicator 9.2Qualifications of workingage population

Pop 16

Table 3.5 Housing and Population Contextual Indicators




4 Transport

4.1 £100M of Regional Funding has been allocated in the AGMA programme for theLongdendale Integrated Transport Scheme (LITS), a replacement for the former Mottram,Hollingwoth and Tintwistle Bypass and the Glossop Spur schemes, previously promoted by theHighways Agency and Tameside MBC respectively. LITS, which is now being managed entirelyby Tameside MBC, is exploring options for resolving the severe congestion on the A57 andA628 in Mottram and Hollingworth. Implementation is expected late 2012/early 2013 oncompletion of comprehensive consultation and subject to the outcome of the statutory procedures.

4.2 Construction for phase 3A of the Metrolink has commenced.This will see a new line fromthe current terminus at Manchester Piccadilly rail station through East Manchester to Droylsdentown centre. £88M of funding is included within the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities(AGMA) programme to extend the line through to Ashton Town Centre with an anticipated startdate in 2010.

4.3 Ashton Northern Bypass (Stage 2) will complete the ring of relief roads around the towncentre and has the potential to open up new employment development sites.The £16M schemeis also included in the AGMA programme and work is anticipated to commence in 2010.

4.4 The Quality Bus Corridor Network within Tameside comprises four:

Rochdale/Oldham/Ashton/HydeManchester/Ashton/StalybridgeManchester/Denton/HydeHyde/Woodley/Stockport

4.5 There has been a substantial growth in patronage between 2003/04 and 2006/07 on thefours QBC's, as indicated below:

Rochdale/Oldham/Ashton/Hyde - 15%Manchester/Ashton/Stalybridge - 45%Manchester/Denton/Hyde - 14%Hyde/Woodley/Stockport - 5% (iii)

4.6 An outline planning application has been approved for the extension of the ArcadesShopping Centre over the existing Ashton-under-Lyne bus station which would be replaced bya new covered bus station fronting Wellington Road.

% of peopleDistance

7.73%Works from home

20.92%Less than 2km

24.41%2km or more but less than 5 km

22.17%5km or more but less than 10km





iii Source: GMPTE - Greater Manchester Quality Bus Corridors - Interim NetworkEvaluation Report



4 Transport

% of peopleDistance

1.58%60km or more

3.46%No fixed place of work

0.13%Working outside of UK

0.04%Working at offshore installation

Table 4.1 Distance travelled to work (resident population). Source:Census 2001

% of peopleMethod

4.89%Works from home

0.07%Underground, metro, light rail or tram

1.42%Train

7.76%Bus, minibus or coach

0.42%Taxi or minicab

35.56%Driving car or van

4.68%Passenger in car or van

0.61%Motorcycle, scooter or moped

0.99%Bicycle

6.62%On foot

0.18%Other

36.81%Not currently working

Table 4.2 Method of travel to work (resident population). Source: Census2001

Parking Standards and Public Transport Journey Times

4.7 Monitoring of the amount of residential development, in table 4.4, within 30 minutes publictransport time of a variety of facilities and services has this year been conducted in accordancewith the monitoring guidelines using the Northwest Traveline Journey Plannerhttp://nw.aimwebsites.co.uk/default.jsp to calculate journey times using public transport.

Transport Significant Effects Indicators

4.8 These significant effects indicators measure progress against sustainability appraisalobjectives. For details of these objectives please see Appendix A 'Sustainability AppraisalObjectives'.

NotesTarget/Rationale

2007/82006/72005/62004/5SourceIndicatorSAObj

Ref

All data from2001

Decrease averagedistance

See Table 4.1Census2001

Distance travelled towork - residentpopulation

19SE 19.1

All data from2001

Increase bus journeysand journeys taken by

See Table 4.2Census2001

Method of travel towork - residentpopulation

27SE 27.1

modes other than thecar

Table 4.3 Transport Significant Effects Indicators



Transport 4

http://nw.aimwebsites.co.uk/default.jsp

Transport Contextual Indicators


Data from 2001 15%Census2001

Percentage of people travelling towork by public transport

Tran1


Percentage of public transport usersowning a car or van

Tran2


Percentage of people travelling lessthan 10km to work

Tran3

Steady decline. * This is nowrecorded for the calendar year and

54*67707794BVPI 99aNumber of people killed andseriously injured on the road

Tran4

refers to the number of people killedin 2008.

Formerly Core Indicator 3a0%0%1.46%100%100%TMBCClass A(floorspace)

Amount ofcompleted

Tran5

non-residential0%0%75.0%100%100%TMBCClass A (no. of

developments)developmentwithin UseClasses A, B

0%52.1%92.2%74.1%93.6%TMBCClass B(floorspace)

and Dcomplying withcar-parking

0%25%83.3%70.0%50.0%TMBCClass B (no. of developments)

standards setout in the LocalDevelopmentFramework N/AN/AN/AN/A33.1%TMBCClass D

(floorspace)

N/AN/AN/AN/A50.0%TMBCClass D (no. of developments)

0%49.3%46.8%75.3%92.2%TMBCTotal (floorspace)

0%20%80%72.7%55.6%TMBCTotal (no. ofdevelopments)

Formerly Core Indicator 3b. Publictransport times were calculated

100%99.9%98.7%99.9%100%TMBCGP:Amount of newresidential

Tran6

60.4%58.1%68.0%64.5%100%TMBCHospital: using NW Traveline JourneyPlanner:http://nw.aimwebsites.co.uk/default.jsp2004/5 figures included cycling inthe definition of public transport.Later figures exclude cycling.

developmentwithin 30minutes publictransport timeof variousfacilities andservices

100%99.8%98.7%100%100%TMBCPrimary school:

100%99.8%98.7%99.9%100%TMBCSecondaryschool:

100%99.8%98.7%99.8%100%TMBCArea ofemployment:

99.8%99.8%98.7%99.8%100%TMBCMajor retailcentre:

Table 4.4 Transport Contextual Indicators



4 Transport

http://nw.aimwebsites.co.uk/default.jsp

5 Local Services and Retail

5.1 The Council has recently commissioned consultants White Young Green Planning tocarry out a review of its 2005-06 retail study to provide and up to date indication of bothcomparison and convenience retailing within the borough. The study will form a vital part of theCouncils evidence base for the Core Strategy and is expected to be completed early 2010.

5.2 During the monitoring period the economic downturn has prompted the closure of multiplessuch as Adam's, JJB Sports and Woolworth's among other independent retailers within Ashtontown centre resulting in additional vacancies in the retail core. Although units that housed JJBSports and Woolworth's remain vacant, the Arcades and Ladysmith Shopping Centres haverecycled retail floorspace relatively successfully.

5.3 Food retailing during the monitoring period however has proved to be rather more resilientcompared to the comparison offer available, particularly by the discount food retailer Alditransferring operations to two new units in both Ashton and Hyde and refurbishing an existingfood retail unit in Stalybridge, increasing the offer available. These completions are largelyattributable to the 3,940 m2 total gross of completed A1 retail floorspace over the monitoringperiod.

5.4 A planning application for the district centre at Hattersley remains outstanding and thereforethere remains the need for an increased convenience retail offer in the east of the borough.

Local Services and Retail Output Indicators

Notes2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5IndicatorRefAlthough 50 m2 of B1(a) office space wascompleted, this has been counted as

3,744 m2nil27,180 m2 nil 7,621 m2RetailAmount ofcompleted retail,office and

CoreBD4(i)UDP11

nilnilnilnilnilOfficeemployment development in core indicatorBD1(i) and cannot be double counted in thissection.

nilnilnilnilnilLeisureleisuredevelopmentrespectively intown centres

Office floorspace counted as employmentdevelopment in core indicator 1a cannot bedouble counted in this section

3,940 m21,154m227,180 m2600 m27,621 m2Retail(gross)

Amount ofcompleted retail,office and

CoreBD4(ii) 2,824 m21,065m225,532 m2450 m25,866 m2Retail (net)

leisure nilnilnilnilnilOfficedevelopmentrespectively

nilnilnilnil1,796 m2Leisure

Ashton (2005) and Hyde (2004) data are fromsurveys carried out by Experian Goad in the

623 (116)18.6%

464 (67) 14.4%AshtonNumber of

commercialUDP10

2005 retail study. Data for other centres frompremises in 210 (30)14.3%

172 (17) 9.9%Denton

TMBC town centre surveys, summer 2003.2008/09 data is from internal on-street surveywork carried out February 2009.

each towncentre andvacancy ratio

144 (26)18.1%

150 (15) 10.0%Droylsden

Data notavailable

Data not availableHattersley

373 (64)17.2%

283 (59) 20.1%Hyde

70 (8) 11.4%

Data not availableMossley

227 (64)28.2%

205 (42) 20.5%Stalybridge

Table 5.1 Local Services and Retail Output Indicators

Local Services and Retail Significant Effects Indicators

5.5 These significant effects indicators measure progress against sustainability appraisalobjectives. For details of these objectives, please see Appendix A 'Sustainability AppraisalObjectives'.



Local Services and Retail 5

NotesTarget /Rationale

2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5SourceIndicatorSAObj

Ref

Reduce See contextual indicator LSR 2

Recorded crimesper 1,000population

7SE7.1

06/07 -Citizens'Panel

Increasefeeling ofsafety

46.6%40%41%41%n/aDaytime, very safeCitizens'PanelSurvey

Proportion ofadults who feelsafe in their

7SE7.2

49.5%57%54%54%n/aDaytime, fairly safeSurveySpring2006

neighbourhoodduring the dayand at night

2.8%3%4%5%n/aDaytime, fairly unsafe

1.0%1%1%1%n/aDaytime, very unsafe 07/08 -Citizens'

9.1%6%5%8%n/aAfter dark, very safe PanelSurvey

54.3%51%41%36%n/aAfter dark, fairly safe Summer2008

25.8%30%37%54%n/aAfter dark, fairly unsafe

10.8%12%16%18%n/aAfter dark, very unsafe

Increasedatanotavailable

34%(Dec07-Feb 08)

datanotavailable

51%-ResidentsOpinionSurvey

Percentage ofresidents whothink that thecouncil listens toresidents' views

8SE8.1

datanotavailable

43%(Dec07-Feb 08)

43%--ResidentsOpinionSurvey

People whothink that thecouncil consultsabout itsservices.

57.5%----CitizensPanelSurvey

% of residentsagree that theycan influence (Winter

2009)decisionsaffecting theirlocal area

70%(Summer2009)

---70%ResidentsOpinionSurvey

% respondentssatisfied with theCouncil isrunning theborough

Table 5.2 Local Services and Retail Significant Effects Indicators



5 Local Services and Retail

Local Services and Retail Contextual Indicators


Residents OpinionSurvey data nextavailable 2011.

-85%(Dec 07-Feb 08)

-84%(Dec 04-Jan 05)

-Residents'opinion survey

Satisfactionwith theborough as aplace to live

LSR 1

For 07/08 this is thenumber of British

63.0 crimesper 1,000residents





British CrimeSurvey

Crime rate inTameside

LSR 2

Comparator crimes per1,000 residents. Thefigure for 06/07 is therate for comparatorcrimes in the BritishCrime Survey and is notcomparable to theprevious figure. Usingthe current methodology,the figure was 75.4crimes per 1,000residents in 2004/5 and85.4 crimes per 1,000residents in 2003/4.

Table 5.3 Local Services and Retail Contextual Indicators



Local Services and Retail 5

6 Conservation and The Environment

Figure 6.1 Location of Listed Buildings in Tameside

6.1 In Tameside, there are313 listings covering 424individual buildings. Of theselistings, there are two grade Ilistings (0.64%), 18 grade II*listings (5.75%) and 293grade II listings (93.61%). AsFigure 6.1 shows listedbuildings are well distributedthroughout the borough (theprecise location of these canbe seen on the Council'sinteractive maps atwww.tameside.gov.uk).

Conservation and TheEnvironment OutputIndicators

Notes2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5IndicatorRef

NoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNumber of planning permissions grantedcontrary to the advice of the Environment

CoreE1

Agency on either flood defence groundsor water quality

No change tothe boundaryarea in 2008/09.

00---Net changein number

SACs/SPAs

Change inareas ofbiodiversity

CoreE2UDP14 00---Net change

in areaimportance(sites ofinternational,

11---Totalnumber

national,regional,sub-regional

105.98 ha105.98 ha---Totalarea

or localsignificance).

Improvement incondition to

00---Net changein number

SSSIs

favourable or00---Net change

in arearecovering forover 99% of thearea recovered.

33---Totalnumber

No change tothe boundaryareas in2008/09.122.1 ha122.1 ha---Total

area

000+10Net changein number

SBIs

+20.03+169.4+216.6 ha+7.3 ha+4.8 haNet changein area

5555555554Totalnumber

1409.73 ha1,389.7 ha1,220.3 ha1,003.7 ha996.4 haTotalarea





None KnownNone Known2 solar and1 wind

None knownNone knownRenewable energy capacity

installed by type

CoreE3

1049.47 ha1049.47 ha1049.47 ha1052.3 ha1,053 haArea atstart ofperiod

Net change in protectedgreen space

UDP12

0.00 ha0.00 ha0.00 ha2.87 ha0.66 haAmountlost

nilnilnilnilnilAmountgained

+/- 0.00 ha+/- 0.00 ha+/- 0.00 ha- 2.87 ha- 0.66 haNetchange

Acomprehensivereview of the

312 listingscovering423 buildings

312 listingsCovering423 buildings

312 listingscovering423buildings



Listedbuildingsat start ofyear

Net change in buildingsprotected for heritage valueand in number of buildings atrisk

UDP13

buildings at riskregister is

+ 1nonenonenonenoneChangeduringyear

proposed andtherefore2008/09 data isunavailable.

313 listings

312 listingscovering 423buildings

312listingscovering423buildings



Listedbuildingsat end ofyear

covering 424buildings

See Notes71717172Buildingsat risk atstart ofyear

See Notes3 removed1 gained, 1removed

none1 removedChangeduringyear

See Notes68717171Buildingsat risk atend ofyear

Continuedincrease in

No dataavailable

+122+ 53+ 125+ 217TreesNet change in protected treesand woodland

UDP15

protected treesand woodland.No data

available+5.9 ha+ 11.53 ha+ 13.2 ha+ 0.76 haWoodland

The provisionalestimate for

-2.7 ha-4.9 ha-4.8 ha- 4.46 ha-5.53 haNetchange

Net change in area of derelictland

UDP16

2007/8 has been77.0 ha79.7 ha79.1 ha83.9 ha88.4 haYear end

totalamended from74.2 ha to 79.7ha. The figurefor 2008/9 isalso aprovisionalestimate.

Table 6.1 Conservation and The Environment output indicators

Conservation and The Environment Significant Effects Indicators

6.2 These significant effects indicators measure progress against sustainability appraisalobjectives. For details of these objectives please see Appendix A 'Sustainability AppraisalObjectives'.



Conservation and The Environment 6



Ref

Reducenumber atriskSee UDP indicator 13

Number of listedbuildings andproportion of sites

10SE 10.1

and monuments atrisk.

2008/9cannot be

Reduce17%9%8%23%-Quality ofLife in

Proportion of landthat has significant

11SE 11.1

directlyTameside,or heavy depositscompared toBook 8.of litter and / or

detritus previous2008/9yeas due toNationalchanges inIndicator

195. monitoringnowfollowing NI195.Some sitesassessed inlate 2007

95% ofSSSIs in anarea to be in

Not available99.07%50.97%--AllMAGICwebsite

Percentage ofSSSIs in favourableor recoveringposition

12SE 12.1Not available100%100%--Huddersfield

Narrow Canala favourableNot available0%0%--Hollinswood

Branch Canal or recoveringposition by2010.

Not available100%52.91%--Dark Peak

The 2006/7figure

Increase----6% (Scrub &Woodland)

MAGICwebsite

Percentage of landcovered by

12SE 12.2

previouslywoodland (baselinecontained infigure from Phasethe AMR has1 Habitat Surveybeen deleted1991/92 of approx

5%) due to itsinaccuracy.

ImproveNot availableNotavailable

72.6%73%73%Biological waterquality

DEFRAPercentage of riverstretches of goodor fair water quality

13SE 13.1

ImproveNot availableNotAvailable

88.2%91%91%Chemical waterquality

Reduce0NotAvailable

01-NitrogenDioxide

Quality ofLife inTameside

Days in which airquality targets wereexceeded

14SE 14.1

Reduce4NotAvailable

01-Particulates

BVPI 216aceased

ReduceData NoLongerRecorded

2339Dataunavailable

Dataunavailable

Dataunavailable

Number of potentialcontaminated sites

15SE 15.2

beingmonitored intheformulationof theNationalIndicator Set.Data cannotbe supplied

Reduce135 litres perperson perday

137 litres perperson perday

140 litresper personper day

150 litresper personper day

-United Utilities'Supply Area

UnitedUtilities

Average householdwater consumption

16SE 16.1

at theboroughlevel

See core indicator E1

Number of planningpermissions

17SE 17.1

granted contrary tothe advice of theEnvironmentAgency on eitherflood defence orwater qualitygrounds

2007 datareleased

Reduce-489514518-Industry andcommercial

Kilo tonnes(CO2)

Carbon DioxideEmissions

17SE 17.2

2009. 2006-495514515-Domesticand 2005-196194202-Road transportdata revised-111-Land use, Land

use Change,and Forestry

by DEFRA2009.

-118112231236-Total

Reduce-5.55.75.8-Per CapitaTonnes(CO2)

Table 6.2 Conservation and the Environment Significant Effects Indicators




Conservation and The Environment Contextual Indicators

Notes2008/92007/82006/72005/62004/5SourceIndicatorRef2005/6 and2006/7 data is not

81%(Winter 2009)

74%(Winter 2008)

82%(Spring 2007)

67%(Spring 2006)

67%(2003)

2004/5 ODPMNeighbourhood

Percentage ofresidents satisfied

Env 1

directlyRenewal Unitwith local parksand open spaces comparable to

2004/52005-2007Citizens PanelSurvey

See significant effects indicator 12.2Percentage of landcovered by scruband woodland

Env 2

HuddersfieldNarrow Canal,

33332Number of Sites ofSpecial ScientificInterest (SSSIs)

Env 3

Boar Flat andHollinwoodBranch Canal

See significant effects indicator 12.1Percentage ofSSSIs in afavourable position

Env 4

Area increase of 170.3 ha between2006 and 2007.

5555555554GreaterManchesterEcology Unit

Number of Sites ofBiologicalImportance (SBIs)

Env 5

See significant effects indicator 13.1Percentage of riverstretches of goodor fair quality

Env 6

No change in theAQMA area.

1 AQMA covering1158.2 ha (11.2%of the borough)

1 AQMA covering1158.2 ha(11.2% of theborough)

1 AQMA covering1158.2 ha(11.2% of theborough)

Following a review,there is 1 AQMAcovering 1158.2 ha(11.2% of theborough)

6 AQMAs aroundthe M60 Ashton,A57/M67, A635,A57 Mottram andB6169 Audenshaw

Air QualityManagementPlan

Number of AirQualityManagementAreas declared

Env 7

Locallydesignatedbuildings at risk

Locally DesignatedList under review.

16.07%16.78%16.78%17.02%Tameside ListPercentage oflisted buildings atrisk

Env 8

9 (158.6 ha in total)9 (158.6 ha in total)9 (158.6 ha in total)9 (158.6 ha in total)9 (158.6 ha in total)Tameside UDPNov 2004

Number ofconservation areas

Env 9

and combined areain hectares

This was formerlyrecorded as CoreIndicator 4c.

1,485 ha1,485 ha1,485 ha1,485 ha1,488 haTotal open spaceAmount of eligibleopen spacesmanaged to greenflag awardstandard

Env 10Victoria Park(1.9 ha)Ryecroft Hall(2.34 ha)Hyde Park(13.16 ha)Oxford Park(2.04 ha)Cedar Park(2.89 ha)Park BridgeCountry Park(37 ha)Werneth LowCountry Park(81 ha) LymefieldCountry Park (4

Victoria Park(1.9 ha)Ryecroft Hall(2.34 ha)Hyde Park(13.16 ha)Oxford Park(2.04 ha)Cedar Park(2.89 ha)Park BridgeCountry Park(37 ha)Werneth LowCountry Park(81 ha)Lymefield CountryPark (4 ha)

Park BridgeHeritage Centre(37 ha)Victoria Park (1.9ha)Werneth LowCountry Park (81ha)Lymefield CountryPark (4 ha)

Park BridgeHeritage Centre(37 ha)Victoria Park (1.9ha)Werneth LowCountry Park (81ha)

Park BridgeHeritage Centre(37 ha)Victoria Park (1.9ha)Werneth LowCountry Park (81ha)

Open spaces withaward

ha) HaughtonGreen PlayingFields(4.2 ha) DentonCemetery (4.18ha) CheethamsPark (16.34ha)169.05 ha144.33 ha123.9 ha120 ha120 haAmount of open

space with award11.38%9.72%8.34%8.08%8.06%% of total open

space that hasaward

Table 6.3 Conservation and Environment Contextual Indicators



Conservation and The Environment 6

7 Minerals and Waste

Minerals and Waste Output Indicators


This data is onlyavailable at the

No new dataavailable

No dataavailable

1.6 milliontonnes

No dataavailable

1.9 milliontonnes(2003)

Combined figurefor GreaterManchester,

Production ofprimaryland wonaggregates

CoreM1

scale listed. Thecouncil does notMerseyside,have the ability toHalton and

Warrington monitor this, and theGreater ManchesterGeological Unitcannot provide thedata at boroughlevel forconfidentialityreasons

This data is onlyavailable at theregional scale

No new dataavailable

No dataavailable

6.02 milliontonnes

No dataavailable

4.68 milliontonnes(2003)

Recycledaggregatescombined figure

Production ofsecondary/recycledaggregates

CoreM2

for the Northwestregion

Dataunavailable

Dataunavailable

NilNilDataunavailable

Capacity of newwaste

CoreW1

managementfacilitiesby type

96,212.61tonnes

104,915 tonnes103,870tonnes

102,226tonnes

103,232 tonnesTotal wasteAmount ofmunicipal waste

CoreW2

arising and16,674 tonnes(17.11%)

16,674 tonnes(20.16%)

15,388 tonnes(14.81%)

14,751tonnes(14.43%)

10,395 tonnes(10.07%)

Recycledmanaged bymanagementtype, and thepercentage each

6,170.76 tonnes(6.41%)

5,733 tonnes(6.93%)

4,870 tonnes(4.69%)

Compostedmanagementtype representsof the wastemanaged 89.00 tonnes

(0.09%)188.63 tonnes(0.18%)

179 tonnes(0.17%)

170 tonnes(0.17%)

170 tonnes(0.16%)

Incinerated

73,489.37tonnes (76.38%)

82,318.50tonnes(78.46%)

83,433 tonnes(80.32%)

87,305tonnes(85.40%)

98,667 tonnes(89.77%)

Landfill

Table 7.1 Minerals and Waste Output Indicators

Minerals and Waste Significant Effects Indicators

7.1 These significant effects indicators measure progress against sustainability appraisalobjectives. BVPI 84 Household waste collected per capita has been replaced by NationalIndicator 191 Residual household waste. NI 191 is measured in kg per household whereasBVPI 84 was per capita. For details of these objectives please see Appendix A 'SustainabilityAppraisal Objectives'.



Ref

BVPI 84 has beenreplaced by National

Reduce wasteNo data385.85 kg389.7kg

379.54kg

389 kgBVPI 84Household wastecollected percapita

20SE20.1

Indicator 191 ResidualHousehold Waste

Note indicator is perhouseholdNOT per capita

Reduce waste567.9 kg615.6 kg---NI 191Residualhousehold waste

Table 7.2 Minerals and Waste Significant Effects Indicators



7 Minerals and Waste

Minerals and Waste Contextual Indicators


See significant effects indicator 20.1Amount of wastecollected fromhouseholds

Min 1

BVPI 82 (a) & (b)replaced by NI 192.See

Minerals

20.16%18.44%18.64%11.41%BVPI82(a)

Proportion of householdwaste recycled

Min 2

From 08/09 periodand WasteIndicator 4

6.93%5.84%2.15%1.11%BVPI82(b)

Proportion of householdwaste composted

Min 3 data is onlyavailable as acombined figure

New NationalIndicator is a total

28.8%27.1%24.3%20.8%12.5%NI 192Household waste sentfor re-use (recycling andcomposting)

Min 4

figure so iscomparable toBVPI 82 (a) and (b)combined

100%100%100%100%82,000Blue bin(paper)

TMBCNumber of propertiescovered by the blue /

Min 5

green / brown bincollection service 95%58,00057%57%55,000Green bin

(glass)

100%100%100%100% ofpropertieswith gardens

27,000Brown bin(gardenwaste)

Table 7.3 Minerals and Waste Contextual Indicators



Minerals and Waste 7

8 Local Development Scheme Monitoring

8.1 The purpose of this section is to look at Local Development Framework progress for theperiod December 2007 to December 2008. The Local Development Scheme approved byGovernment Office in April 2007, which included significant revisions and simplifications, is stillcurrently in place. However a replacement LDS will come forward in early 2009 and there willbe significant changes to the LDF project plan.

8.2 Headline issues are covered in the following text.

Development Plan Documents

8.3 After a late start much progress has been made on developing a comprehensive evidencebase for the local development framework and particularly the Core Strategy. This, on the faceof it, has caused delay and has necessitated rescheduling but the evidence base will be soundand comprehensive. The following is an account of the work that has been undertaken so far:

The updated Sustainability Appraisal is being drafted by environmental consultants Entecwith the assistance of Paul Butler Associates is now available in draft and will be going outto consultation to the statutory consultees. That will be completed in February when thedocument will be published.The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment will be largely completed in the NewYear when we will be able to go to members and undertake the required consultationsbefore publication. An issues and spatial analysis will be undertaken at the same time.The Affordable Housing Economic Viability Assessment will soon be presented in draft andshould be finalised by mid January.There are two pieces of work being prepared in tandem on employment land, the first is aMarket Assessment from CBRE and the second is an Employment Land Review beingundertaken in house. The first is in draft at the time of writing and the second is wellunderway but both will not be published until New Year.At the time of writing it has been confirmed that the Joint Strategic Flood Risk AssessmentLevel 2 with Stockport from Scott Wilson is due to be passed to us in draft before Christmasbut that will need to be finalised before publication in the New Year.The Recreation Needs and Demand Study being prepared by Knight, Kavannah and Pagewill be delivered in draft in two phases in January. The first draft will be the open spaceelement and the second phase will be the sports facilities. The first element will enable usto progress issues and spatial analysis but at the moment we are waiting.The revised Retail Study is in draft now and will be reported to members mid January.The GM Transportation Modelling work is well underway but we await our district assessmentwhich is due before Christmas.Infrastructure Planning has not commenced as yet and will not do until we move towardspreferred options when the council has a clearer idea about development options.We are also on the verge of going to public consultation on our Conservation Appraisalsbut these will not be completed until March.

8.4 The Council now intends to produce the following Development Plan Documents withinthe timeframe of a revised Local Development Scheme which is expected to be approved andpublished soon. This new project plan will reflect the new milestones contained in The Town




and Country Planning (Local Development) Regulations 2004 and their 2008 amendments thatnow accompany the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and are reflected in PlanningPolicy Statement No.12.

The Core Strategy and Development Management Policies DevelopmentPlan Document

8.5 There are no impediments to the production of this document now a comprehensiveevidence base is largely assembled. Milestones for the production of this document have beenmissed which has necessitated the drafting of a new Local Development Scheme which oughtto be approved soon. However, it is expected that the Core Strategy will now be adopted towardsthe end of 2011.

8.6 The document will contain the key spatial policies/proposals of the Local DevelopmentFramework for Tameside. It will comprise of a spatial vision and strategic objectives for theBorough, a locally distinctive place shaping strategy, a project plan for achieving the strategyand a monitoring framework. A suite of underlying development management policies will alsobe developed. The timescales are outlined in the project plan at table 8.3.

Site Allocations Development Plan Document

8.7 This Development Plan Document will closely follow the Core Strategy with the intentionof identifying sites for certain types of development. This Development Plan Document willestablish the principles of proposed uses on the allocated sites and is programmed to followon 12 months after the production stages of the core strategy which means the DevelopmentPlan Document could have passed through all production stages and adoption could be achievedDecember 2012.

The Proposals Map Development Plan Document

8.8 When the Council adopts its first Development Plan Document it will update the adoptedProposals Map (Tameside Replacement Unitary Development Plan, November 2004) to coveramendments and additions arising from adopted Development Plan Documents. The ProposalsMap covers the whole borough and is an amalgam of all policy designations and proposals.This is updated and re-adopted at the same time as each new Development Plan Document isadopted.

Greater Manchester Joint Waste Development Plan Document

8.9 The Joint Waste Development Plan Document (JWDPD) will become Greater Manchester’sjointly preferred approach to waste management to reduce landfill. The JWDPD therefore aimsto identify sites to enable the development of infrastructure to achieve this as well as allow fora strategy to enable the disposal of the residue of the reprocessed waste.

8.10 It is intended to finish the production of the JWDPD by January 2012. Current policyfor waste management in Greater Manchester is in each one of GM’s Metropolitan BoroughUnitary Development Plans (UDPs) which the JWDPD will replace. However, in order to provideplanning policy coverage during the plan preparation period, relevant policies in the UnitaryDevelopment Plan has been saved until replaced.



Local Development Scheme Monitoring 8

Greater Manchester Joint Minerals Development Plan Document

8.11 The Joint Minerals Development Plan Document (JMDPD) will become GreaterManchester’s jointly preferred approach to minerals planning. The JMDPD therefore aims toidentify mineral resources to enable the development of a framework to secure the winning ofthe minerals required to meet the regional performance expected of us an to meet the needsof strategic planning in Greater Manchester.

8.12 It is intended to finish the production of the JMDPD by October 2012. As with the WastePlan, current policy for minerals planning in Greater Manchester is in each one of GreaterManchester’s Metropolitan Borough Unitary Development Plans which the JMDPD will replace.However, in order to provide planning policy coverage during the plan preparation period,relevant policies in the Unitary Development Plan has been saved until replaced.

Supplementary Planning Documents

8.13 These documents provide detailed advice on specific issues or individual sites to clarifydevelopment plan policies. They have not introduced new policy; rather they clarify how policywill be applied or offer advice on best practice. However, because they are duly made, whererelevant, they must be taken into account in the determination of planning applications. Theyare subject to participation and are formally adopted documents (Reg 19 of the 2004 Regulations)but they are not subject to examination in public because they do not introduce substantivepolicy.

8.14 The following Supplementary Planning Documents have been duly made and adopted.These are:

Residential Development Guidelines & House Extensions – adopted August 2005;A Guide to Developer Contributions – adopted November 2006;Sustainable Design & Construction Guide – adopted October 2005;Trees, Landscaping and Development – adopted March 2007; andBrookbottom Development Brief, Mossley – adopted July 2005Employment Land - adopted January 2009

8.15 See http://www.tameside.gov.uk/planning and follow “local development framework”

8.16 The following Supplementary Planning Documents are proposed. These are:

Ashton Town Centre Strategy – see timetable;Stalybridge Town Centre Strategy – see timetable;Hyde Town Centre Strategy – see timetable;Conservation Areas Policy Statement – see timetable; andAmendments to the Residential Development Guidelines – see timetable.

Statement of Community Involvement

8.17 This sets out how the Council will engage stakeholders and the community in thepreparation of planning documents. It will be revised soon in light of new Planning Legislationbut for the moment the adopted document is still definitive.




8.18 The Statement of Community Involvement was adopted in July 2006 and sets out howconsultation on the production of new planning policies and planning applications will beundertaken. See http://www.tameside.gov.uk/planning and follow “local development framework”.

Saved Policies

8.19 The following policies, plans and guidance material were produced under the formerdevelopment plans system enabled by the 1991 Planning Act. These have been saved for themoment until such time as they are in part or wholly replaced by the new suite of documentsunder the 2004 Act. Our web site contains the details of the direction which was issued by thesecretary of state on 18th September 2007 which enabled this.

8.20 The Council has saved certain policies until the adoption of the core strategy and theseare outlined in the Local Development Scheme. Some site specific policies will remain until theadoption of the Site Allocation DPD where appropriate to do so. Appendix D details each savedpolicy and indentifies how the Council intends to replace them.

Unitary Development Plan

8.21 The Tameside Replacement Unitary Development Plan (UDP) was adopted by theCouncil in November 2004 and was up to date and in conformity with the Regional SpatialStrategy (Regional Planning Guidance for the North West) at that time. This will be replacedbut remains saved for the moment. See http://www.tameside.gov.uk/planning and follow “localdevelopment framework”.

8.22 Unitary Development Plan Part 1 Policies and generic development control policies inPart 2 will be replaced by the Core Strategy in October 2011 which, in turn, will be in conformitywith the Regional Spatial Strategy adopted in October 2008.

8.23 Where applicable, the site specific Part II policies, in whole or in part, will be replacedby the Site Allocation Development Plan Document which is due to be adopted in 2012. Inparticular, housing and employment sites will necessitate site allocations and site specificpolicies to guide development.The potential for adjustments to this Local Development Schemeguide policy making will be considered in the Annual Monitoring Report.

Regional Planning Context

8.24 The North West of England Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021 became the statutoryRegional Spatial Strategy in September 2008. When the Government adopted this it took intoaccount the Examination in Public Panels’ recommendations. The examination in public intothe draft Regional Spatial Strategy commenced in October 2006 and reported in March 2007.

8.25 The Partial Review of the Regional Spatial Strategy dealing with special issues relatingto regional car parking standards and Gypsies and Travellers is about to be examined in public.Also, work has started on the Single Regional Strategy but the implication of this will emergein more detail next year.




Resources

8.26 The production of Local Development Documents was the task of the Council’s StrategicPlanning Unit with six people overall were geared towards producing Local DevelopmentDocuments and four staff devoted to the production of the core documents of the LocalDevelopment Framework, managing the evidence base and monitoring effects. This positionwas severely compromised during 2007/8 due to staff leaving and illness.

8.27 In 2009 efforts were concentrated on initiating and seeing through evidence gatheringprojects. These have taken more time and effort than anticipated and have stretched theresources we have available but considerable progress has been made.

Review of the Local Development Framework

8.28 The Local Development Framework will need to be continually reviewed and revised.The Annual Monitoring Report will be the primary mechanism for identifying the need for revisedor additional local development documents, although ad-hoc monitoring may also indicate theneed for changes. Revisions will have to be programmed in the Local Development Schemeand agreed by the Secretary of State before it can be re-published.




Lo

cal D

evel

op

men

t D

ocu

men

ts M

ilest

on

e D

etai

ls

Ad

op

tio

n a

nd

pu

blic

atio

n o

fd

ocu

men

tIn

spec

tors

bin

din

g r

epo

rtM

ilest

on

e fo

r en

d o

fex

amin

atio

nM

ilest

on

e fo

rp

re-e

xam

inat

ion

mee

tin

g

Mile

sto

ne

for s

ub

mis

sio

n to

So

San

d s

tart

of

dep

osi

t p

erio

dC

on

sult

atio

n a

nd

par

tici

pat

ion

on

Dra

ft S

CI (

Reg

. 25

& R

eg. 2

6)S

cop

ing

of

SC

IM

ilest

on

es

BV

PI M

ilest

on

eB

VP

I Mile

sto

ne

BV

PI M

ilest

on

e

Act

ual

Dat

eL

DS

Dat

eA

ctu

al D

ate

Est

imat

eA

ctu

alD

ate

LD

S D

ate

Act

ual

Dat

eL

DS

Dat

eA

ctu

al D

ate

LD

S D

ate

Act

ual

Dat

eL

DS

Dat

eS

tart

edL

DS

Dat

eTy

pe

Do

cum

ent

17th

Jul

y 20

06Ju

l 06

2nd

May

200

6 w

asth

e da

te o

f the

insp

ecto

rate

sbi

ndin

g re

port

Mar

200

6n/

aJa

n 20

06S

ubm

itted

28t

hN

ov 2

005

Nov

200

5R

eg 2

5 st

arte

d 8t

hJu

ly 2

005;

Reg

26

star

ted

25th

Jul

y20

05

July

- A

ugus

t20

05ye

sM

arch

-Ju

ne 2

005

SC

IS

tate

men

t of

Com

mun

ityIn

volv

emen

t

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Now

ado

pted

Tab

le 8

.1 T

ames

ide

Lo

cal D

evel

op

men

t S

chem

e M

on

ito

rin

g: S

tate

men

t o

f C

om

mu

nit

y In

volv

emen

t

Ad

op

tio

n a

nd

pu

blic

atio

n o

fd

ocu

men

t

Insp

ecto

rsb

ind

ing

rep

ort

Exa

min

atio

n d

ate

Mile

sto

ne

for

pre

-exa

min

atio

nm

eeti

ng

Mile

sto

ne

for

sub

mis

sio

n t

o S

oS

(Reg

. 29)

Pu

blic

par

tici

pat

ion

on

pre

ferr

ed o

pti

on

san

d S

A R

epo

rt (

Reg

.26

)

Pre

-su

bm

issi

on

con

sulta

tion

(Iss

ues

an

dO

pti

on

s)

Co

nsu

ltat

ion

on

SA

Sco

pin

g R

epo

rtC

om

men

cem

ent

&ev

iden

ce g

ath

erin

gM

ilest

on

es

Act

ual

Dat

eL

DS

Dat

eA

ctu

alD

ate

Est

imat

eA

ctu

alD

ate

LD

SD

ate

Act

ual

Dat

eL

DS

Dat

eA

ctu

al D

ate

LD

S D

ate

Act

ual

Dat

eL

DS

Dat

eA

ctu

alD

ate

LD

S D

ate

Act

ual

Dat

eL

DS

Dat

eS

tart

edL

DS

Dat

eTy

pe

Do

cum

ent

Dec

11

Nov

11

Aug

11

Jul 1

1M

ay 1

1N

ov 1

0D

elay

ed,

see

fort

hcom

ing

LDS

Jul 1

0Ja

n 10

N/A

yes

Jan

10D

PD

Cor

e S

trat

egy

for T

ames

ide

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Giv

en d

elay

s, a

rev

ised

tim

etab

le w

ill b

e in

clud

ed in

the

2009

Loc

al D

evel

opm

ent S

chem

e

Dec

12

Nov

12

Aug

12

Jul 1

2M

ay 1

2N

ov 1

1Ju

l 11

Jan

11N

/AD

elay

ed,

see

fort

hcom

ing

LDS

Mar

200

9 /

Feb

201

0D

PD

Site

Allo

catio

ns

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

not

yet

com

men

ced

Jan

12O

ct 1

1Ju

n 11

Apr

11

Ext

raC

onsu

ltatio

nF

eb 1

1A

ug 1

1S

ep 0

71s

t Dec

2009

5th

Sep

2006

2009

yes

Sep

06

DP

DG

reat

erM

anch

este

rJo

int W

aste

DP

D

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

The

tim

etab

le h

as b

een

exte

nded

to a

ccom

mod

ate

extr

a Is

sues

and

Opt

ions

con

sulta

tion

stag

es.

Oct

12

Aug

12

Apr

12

Feb

12

Dec

11

Jul 1

11s

t Feb

2009

1st O

ct20

091s

t Oct

2009

Yes

Oct

09

DP

DG

reat

erM

anch

este

rJo

int M

iner

als

DP

D




Ad

op

tio

n a

nd

pu

blic

atio

n o

fd

ocu

men

t

Insp

ecto

rsb

ind

ing

rep

ort

Exa

min

atio

n d

ate

Mile

sto

ne

for

pre

-exa

min

atio

nm

eeti

ng

Mile

sto

ne

for

sub

mis

sio

n t

o S

oS

(Reg

. 29)

Pu

blic

par

tici

pat

ion

on

pre

ferr

ed o

pti

on

san

d S

A R

epo

rt (

Reg

.26

)

Pre

-su

bm

issi

on

con

sulta

tion

(Iss

ues

an

dO

pti

on

s)

Co

nsu

ltat

ion

on

SA

Sco

pin

g R

epo

rtC

om

men

cem

ent

&ev

iden

ce g

ath

erin

gM

ilest

on

es

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Reg

ulat

ion

25 C

omm

ence

men

t Not

ice

has

been

pub

lishe

d

Tab

le 8

.2 T

ames

ide

Lo

cal D

evel

op

men

t S

chem

e M

on

ito

rin

g: D

evel

op

men

t P

lan

Do

cum

ents

Ad

op

tio

n a

nd

pu

blic

atio

n o

fd

ocu

men

tP

ub

lic p

arti

cip

atio

n o

n c

on

sult

atio

nd

raft

of

SP

D a

nd

SA

Rep

ort

(R

eg.

17)

Sta

keh

old

er &

co

mm

un

ity

eng

agem

ent

for

SP

Ds

Co

nsu

ltat

ion

on

SA

Sco

pin

gR

epo

rtC

om

men

cem

ent

& e

vid

ence

gat

her

ing

Mile

sto

nes

Act

ual D

ate

LDS

Dat

eA

ctua

l Dat

eLD

S D

ate

Act

ual D

ate

LDS

Dat

eA

ctua

l Dat

eLD

S D

ate

Sta

rted

LDS

Dat

eTy

peD

ocum

ent

29 J

ul 0

5Ju

l 05

Mar

05

Mar

05

15 N

ov 0

4N

ov /

Dec

200

4N

ov 0

4N

/Aye

sA

ug /

Oct

200

4S

PD

Bro

okbo

ttom

Dev

elop

men

t Brie

f

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Ado

pted

and

mile

ston

es m

et.

31 A

ug 0

5A

ug 0

527

May

05

May

05

Feb

05

Jan

/ Feb

200

5F

eb 0

4N

/Aye

sS

ep /

Dec

200

4S

PD

Res

iden

tial G

uide

lines

and

Ext

ensi

ons

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Ado

pted

and

mile

ston

es m

et.

26 O

ct 0

5O

ct 0

524

Jan

05

Jan

05

Com

plet

ed 2

003

N/A

N/A

yes

Com

plet

ed 2

003

SP

DS

usta

inab

le D

esig

n an

dC

onst

ruct

ion

Gui

de

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Ado

pted

and

mile

ston

es m

et.

Mar

07

Feb

06

29 N

ov 0

6O

ct 0

5M

ay /

Jun

2005

7th

Aug

200

6N

/Aye

sF

eb /

Apr

200

5S

PD

Tree

s, L

ands

capi

ng a

ndD

evel

opm

ent

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Ado

pted

.

28 N

ov 0

6O

ct 0

6Ju

l 06

Sep

05

Aug

/ S

ep 2

005

N/A

yes

Mar

/ Ju

l 200

5S

PD

Gui

de to

Dev

elop

erC

ontr

ibut

ions

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Doc

umen

t ado

pted

on

28th

Nov

embe

r 20

06.

Nov

10

Aug

10

Jan

- Ju

n 10

N/A

Yes

Jan

10S

PD

Con

serv

atio

n A

reas

Pol

icy

Sta

tem

ent

Cur

rent

Sta

tus:

See

Loc

al D

evel

opm

ent S

chem

e

Jan

09

Mar

07

Jul 0

7

Sep

07

20th

Sep

200

7N

/Aye

sJa

n / A

pril

2007

SP

DE

mpl

oym

ent L

and

SP

D

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Slip

page

due

to c

onsu

ltatio

n is

sues

.

TB

AS

ep 0

9D

ec 0

9Ju

n 07

ea

rly 2

007

26th

Jul

y200

6N

/Aye

sA

pr /

Dec

200

6S

PD

Ash

ton

Tow

n C

entr

e S

trat

egy

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Wor

k st

arte

d bu

t pro

gres

sion

diff

icul

t due

to s

taffi

ng is

sues

.

Feb

12

Nov

11

Mar

- J

ul 1

1N

/AYe

sF

eb 1

1S

PD

Sta

lybr

idge

Tow

n C

entr

eS

trat

egy

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

See

Loc

al D

evel

opm

ent S

chem

e




Ad

op

tio

n a

nd

pu

blic

atio

n o

fd

ocu

men

tP

ub

lic p

arti

cip

atio

n o

n c

on

sult

atio

nd

raft

of

SP

D a

nd

SA

Rep

ort

(R

eg.

17)

Sta

keh

old

er &

co

mm

un

ity

eng

agem

ent

for

SP

Ds

Co

nsu

ltat

ion

on

SA

Sco

pin

gR

epo

rtC

om

men

cem

ent

& e

vid

ence

gat

her

ing

Mile

sto

nes

Oct

11

Aug

11

Jan

- M

ar 1

1N

/AJa

n 11

SP

DH

yde

Tow

n C

entr

e S

trat

egy

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

See

Loc

al D

evel

opm

ent S

chem

e

Nov

06

Aug

06

Feb

/ M

ar 2

006

Wit

hd

raw

nN

/Aye

sS

ep 2

005

/ Jan

200

6S

PD

Pub

lic R

ealm

Str

ateg

y

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

With

draw

n fo

llow

ing

the

revi

ew o

f the

LD

S

Mar

06

Nov

05

Jul /

Aug

200

5W

ith

dra

wn

N/A

yes

Oct

200

4 / J

un 2

005

SP

DG

reen

spac

e S

trat

egy

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

Pro

duct

ion

will

con

tinue

as

a C

ounc

il do

cum

ent o

utsi

de o

f the

Loc

al D

evel

opm

ent F

ram

ewor

k

N/A

Aug

05

Wit

hd

raw

nJu

n 05

Feb

05

Dec

200

4 / M

ar 2

005

Feb

05

N/A

yes

Sep

/ D

ec 2

004

SP

DT

he E

veni

ng E

cono

my

Cur

rent

sta

tus:

With

draw

n fo

llow

ing

the

revi

ew o

f the

LD

S

Mar

10

Feb

10

Sta

rted

N/A

Sta

rted

SP

DA

men

ded

Res

iden

tial

Dev

elop

men

t Gui

delin

es

Cur

rent

Sta

tus:

See

Loc

al D

evel

opm

ent S

chem

e

Tab

le 8

.3 T

ames

ide

Lo

cal D

evel

op

men

t S

chem

e M

on

ito

rin

g: S

up

ple

men

tary

Pla

nn

ing

Do

cum

ents




A Sustainability Appraisal Objectives

DescriptionObj NoTo improve access to good quality, affordable and resource efficient housing1To enable people to enjoy long life, free from disease and limiting illness2To develop strong and positive relationships between people from different backgrounds3To deliver an urban renaissance4To regenerate rural areas5To improve access to and use of basic goods, services and amenities6To reduce crime, disorder and the fear of crime7To enable groups and communities to contribute towards decision making8To provide education which is accessible to and valued by all and produces achievements above the norm9To protect places, landscapes and buildings of cultural and archaeological value10To protect and improve local environmental quality11To protect and enhance biodiversity12To protect and improve the quality of inland waters13To protect and improve air quality14To protect and improve land quality15To ensure the prudent use of natural resources and the sustainable management of existing resources16To address the need to limit and adapt to climate change17To minimise the requirement for energy use, promote efficient energy use, and increase the use of energyfrom renewable sources

18

To reduce the need to travel19To ensure the sustainable management of waste, minimise its production and increase re-use, recycling andrecovery rates

20

To establish a prosperous borough that offers attractive opportunities to individuals, businesses andcommunities

21

To develop and exploit the borough's knowledge base22To exploit the growth potential of business sectors23To improve the competitiveness and productivity of businesses24To secure economic inclusion25To develop and maintain a healthy labour market26To develop strategic transport, communication and economic infrastructure27

Table A.1 List of Sustainability Appraisal objectives

A.1 Progress against these sustainability appraisal objectives is measured using the significanteffects indicators.



A Sustainability Appraisal Objectives

B List of Indicators

Local Development Framework Core Output Indicators

PageIndicatorRef10Total amount of gross additional employment floorspace by typeCore BD1(i)10Total amount of net additional employment floorspace by typeCore BD1(ii)10/11Total amount of employment floorspace on previously developed land by typeCore BD211Employment land available, by typeCore BD327Total amount of floorspace for 'town centre uses' within town centresCore BD4 (i)27Total amount of floorspace for 'town centre uses' within the local authority areaCore BD4 (ii)18Plan period and housing targetsCore H118Net additional dwellings - in previous yearsCore H2 (a)18Net additional dwellings - for the reporting yearCore H2 (b)18Net additional dwellings - in future yearsCore H2 (c)(i)18Estimated gross area (ha) of gross completionsCore H2 (c)(ii)18Target for annual average rate of housing provision (net of clearance)Core H2 (c)(iii)18/19Managed delivery targetCore H2 (d)19New and converted dwellings on previously developed landCore H319Net additional pitches (Gypsy and Traveller)Core H419Gross affordable housing completionsCore H519Housing Quality - Building for Life AssessmentsCore H630Number of planning permissions granted contrary to Environment Agency advice on flooding

and water quality groundsCore E1

30/31Change in areas of biodiversity importanceCore E231Renewable energy generationCore E336Production of primary land won aggregates by mineral planning authorityCore M136Production of secondary and recycled aggregates by mineral planning authorityCore M236Capacity of new waste management facilities by waste planning authorityCore W136Amount of municipal waste arising, and managed by management type by waste planning

authorityCore W2

Table B.1 Local Development Framework updated core output indicators

Tameside Unitary Development Plan Output Indicators

PageIndicatorRef11Area of land developed for employment purposes, and floorspace providedUDP 111Remaining supply of land for employment developmentUDP 211Area of land previously used for employment which was developed for other usesUDP 319Total number of new dwellings completedUDP 419Number of dwellings completed on windfall sitesUDP 519Number and proportion of dwellings completed on brownfield sites and through conversionsUDP 619Number of social or affordable dwellings completedUDP 719Number of dwellings cleared, including tenure and occupancyUDP 819Remaining supply of land for housing developmentUDP 927Number of commercial premises in each town centre and vacancy ratioUDP 1027New retail and leisure floorspace completed in-centre, edge-of-centre and out-of-centreUDP 1131Net change in protected green spaceUDP 1231Net change in buildings protected for heritage value and in number of buildings at riskUDP 1330/31Net change in sites protected for nature conservation valueUDP 1431Net change in protected trees and woodlandUDP 1532Net change in area of derelict landUDP 16

Table B.2 Tameside Unitary Development Plan output indicators



List of Indicators B

Significant Effects Indicators

B.1 These significant effects indicators measure progress against sustainability appraisalobjectives. For details of these objectives please see

PageIndicatorSA ObjRef20Increase in affordable housing1SE 1.120Number of BREEAM buildings1SE 1.220Percentage of homes unfit for use1SE 1.320Male and female life expectancy at birth2SE 2.120% of people who think that their local area is a place where people from different

backgrounds get on well together3SE 3.1

20Net change in population4SE 4.111Number of new business start-ups in rural areas5SE 5.120% of population living in SOAs ranked by IMD2004 in the 33% most deprived due

to barriers to housing and services deprivation6SE 6.1

21% of population living in SOAs ranked by IMD2004 in the 335 most deprived dueto all factors

6SE 6.2

28Recorded crimes per 1000 population7SE 7.128Proportion of adults who feel safe in their neighbourhood during the day and at night7SE 7.228% of residents who think that the council takes notice of residents' views8SE 8.121Percentage of pupils obtaining 5 or more GCSEs at grades A*-C9SE 9.121Qualifications of working age population9SE 9.221Number of Tameside residents entering higher education9SE 9.321School leavers in education, employment or training9SE 9.432Number of listed buildings and % of sites and monuments at risk10SE 10.132Proportion of land that has significant or heavy deposits of liiter and / or detritus11SE 11.132% of SSSI in favourable or recovering condition12SE 12.132% of land covered by woodland12SE 12.233% of river stretches of good or fair water quality13SE 13.133Days in which air quality target levels were exceeded (2005)14SE 14.121Density of new residential development15SE 15.133Number of potential contaminated sites15SE 15.233Average household water consumption16SE 16.133Number of planning permissions granted contrary to the advice of the Environment

Agency on either flood defence ground or water quality17SE 17.1

33CO2 emissions17SE 17.221Energy efficiency average SAP rating for social housing18SE 18.122Energy efficiency average SAP rating for private sector housing18SE 18.225Distance travelled to work19SE 19.137Household waste collected per capita20SE 20.111Number of VAT registered businesses21SE 21.111% of occupations within 'managers and senior officials', 'professional occupations'

and 'associate professional and technical' categories22SE 22.1

12Change in number of VAT registered businesses23SE 23.112Gross Value Added (GVA) per worker24SE 24.112Economic activity rates as a percentage of working age population25SE 25.122Proportion of working age adults with NVQ4 or higher26SE 26.125Method of travel to work - resident population27SE 27.1

Table B.3 Significant effects indicators

Contextual Indicators

PageIndicatorRef12Working age resident populationEcon 112Economically active populationEcon 212Percentage unemployment gap between the average top three highest and bottom three lowest

wards in the boroughEcon 3



B List of Indicators

PageIndicatorRef12Household income levelEcon 412Number of VAT registered businesses per 1,000 residentsEcon 512Gross weekly pay for full time workersEcon 613Employment by occupationEcon 713Jobs Density (ratio of total jobs to working age population)Econ 813Average House PriceEcon 913Proportion of all employment in manufacturingEcon 1013Percentage of all businesses that employ 10 people or lessEcon 1113Losses of employment land in local authority areaEcon 1213Amount of employment land lost to residential developmentEcon 1323Total resident populationPop 123Population DensityPop 223Number of householdsPop 323Dwelling StockPop 423Ethnic CompositionPop 523ReligionPop 623Average Household SizePop 723Percentage of homes unfit for usePop 823Number of unfit homes in social housingPop 923Proportion of social housing not meeting the Decent Homes StandardPop 1023Number of vacant private sector dwellings returned to occupationPop 1123Percentage of dwellings emptyPop 1223Indices of multiple deprivationPop 1323% population with no qualificationsPop 1423Percentage of pupils obtaining 5 or more GCSEs at A*-CPop 1523Qualifications of working age populationPop 1626Percentage of people travelling to work by public transportTran 126Percentage of public transport users owning a car or vanTran 226% of people travelling less than 10km to workTran 326Number of people killed and seriously injured on the roadTran 426Amount of completed non-residential development within Use Classes A, B and D complying

with car-parking standards set out in the Local Development FrameworkTran 5

26Amount of new residential development within 30 minutes of public transport time to variousfacilities and services

Tran 6

29Satisfaction with the Borough as a place to liveLSR 129Crime rate in TamesideLSR 233/34Percentage of residents satisfied with local parks and open spacesEnv 134Percentage of land area covered by scrub and woodlandEnv 234Number of SSSIs (Sites of Special Scientific Interest)Env 334Percentage of SSSIs in a favourable positionEnv 434Number of SBIs (Sites of Biological Importance)Env 534Percentage of river stretches of good or fair qualityEnv 634Number of Air Quality Management Areas declaredEnv 734Percentage of listed buildings at riskEnv 834Number of conservation areas and combined area in hectaresEnv 934/35Amount of eligible open spaces managed to green flag award standardsEnv 1037Amount of waste collected from householdsMin 137Proportion of household waste recycledMin 237Proportion of household waste compostedMin 337Household waste sent for re-use (recycling and composting)Min 437Number of properties covered by the blue / green / brown bin serviceMin 5

Table B.4 Contextual indicator



List of Indicators B

C H

ou

sin

g T

raje

cto

ry F

igu

res

Co

mm

ents

(see

par

aC

.1)

Ho

usi

ng

traj

ecto

ry d

ata

bas

ed o

np

lan

ned

rat

e o

fp

rovi

sio

n o

f 750

dw

ellin

gs

per

ann

um

Co

reO

utp

ut

ind

icat

or

Res

idu

al P

erio

dT

he

No

rth

Wes

t o

f E

ng

lan

d P

lan

Reg

ion

al S

pat

ial S

trat

egy

to 2

021

Tota

l23 -

24

22 - 23

21 - 22

20 - 21

19 - 20

18 -

19

17 - 18

16 -17

15 - 16

14 -15

13 -14

12 -13

11 -12

10 -11

09 -10

08 -09

07 -08

06 -07

05 -06

04 -05

03 -04

Pro

ject

ion

sC

om

ple

tio

ns

2934

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

789

563

684

383

515

Net

add

ition

aldw

ellin

gs 2

003

-20

08

H2(

a)

652

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-65

2-

--

--

Net

add

ition

aldw

ellin

gs 2

008

-20

09

H2(

b)

A, B

, C, D

,E

& F

1315

075

075

075

080

080

080

080

085

095

011

5012

5012

5010

0075

050

0-

--

--

-

Gro

ss a

nnua

lco

mpl

etio

ns(p

roje

cted

from

Apr

il 20

09on

war

ds)

G

1080

7070

7070

7070

7070

7070

7070

7070

100

--

--

--

Ann

ual a

llow

ance

for c

lear

ance

and

othe

r dw

ellin

glo

sses

1207

068

068

068

073

073

073

073

078

088

010

8011

8011

8093

068

040

0-

--

--

-

Net

ann

ual

hous

ing

expe

cted

H2(

c)

to c

ome

forw

ard

(fro

m A

pril

2009

onw

ards

)

H-

--

--

--

--

--

23.0

25.0

25.0

20.0

15.0

--

--

--

Est

imat

ed g

ross

area

(ha

) of

com

plet

ions

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

750

Targ

et fo

r an

nual

aver

age

rate

of

hous

ing

prov

isio

n(n

et o

f cle

aran

ce)

H

1272

268

068

068

073

073

073

073

078

088

010

8011

8011

8093

068

040

065

2-

--

--

Net

add

ition

aldw

ellin

gsH

2(d)

expe

cted

to c

ome

forw

ard

over

the

rem

aini

ng p

lan



C Housing Trajectory Figures

Co

mm

ents

(see

par

aC

.1)

Ho

usi

ng

traj

ecto

ry d

ata

bas

ed o

np

lan

ned

rat

e o

fp

rovi

sio

n o

f 750

dw

ellin

gs

per

ann

um

Co

reO

utp

ut

ind

icat

or

Res

idu

al P

erio

dT

he

No

rth

Wes

t o

f E

ng

lan

d P

lan

Reg

ion

al S

pat

ial S

trat

egy

to 2

021

Tota

l23 -

24

22 - 23

21 - 22

20 - 21

19 - 20

18 -

19

17 - 18

16 -17

15 - 16

14 -15

13 -14

12 -13

11 -12

10 -11

09 -10

08 -09

07 -08

06 -07

05 -06

04 -05

03 -04

Pro

ject

ion

sC

om

ple

tio

ns

perio

d (f

rom

Apr

il20

08 o

nwar

ds -

incl

udin

g th

ere

port

ing

year

)

I & J

1565

614

976

1429

613

616

1288

612

156

1142

610

696

9916

9036

7956

6776

5596

4666

3986

3586

2934

2145

1582

898

515

Cum

ulat

ive

net

com

plet

ions

from

Apr

il 20

03on

war

ds (

actu

al /

then

pro

ject

edfr

om A

pril

2009

onw

ards

)

1575

015

000

1425

013

500

1275

012

000

1125

010

500

9750

9000

8250

7500

6750

6000

5250

4500

3750

3000

2250

1500

750

Cum

ulat

ive

net

targ

et (

base

d on

annu

al a

vera

gera

te o

f pro

visi

onof

750

dw

ellin

gs)

J

-94

-24

4611

613

615

617

619

616

636

-294

-724

-115

4-1

334

-126

4-9

14-8

16-8

55-6

68-6

02-2

35

Diff

eren

ce (

plus

or m

inus

)be

twee

ncu

mul

ativ

e to

tal

for

actu

al /

proj

ecte

d ne

tco

mpl

etio

ns a

ndcu

mul

ativ

e ne

tta

rget

J

--

-61

467

269

170

171

774

479

284

187

888

386

582

681

381

179

578

876

475

0

"Man

aged

Del

iver

y Ta

rget

"- R

esid

ual a

nnua

lre

quire

men

t to

achi

eve

the

over

all R

SS

targ

et b

y 20

21ta

king

acc

ount

of

prev

ious

act

ual /

proj

ecte

d ne

tco

mpl

etio

ns Tab

le C

.1 H

ou

sin

g t

raje

cto

ry 2

002-

2023

: Su

pp

ort

ing

dat

a b

ased

on

a p

lan

ned

rat

e o

f p

rovi

sio

n o

f 75

0 n

et a

dd

itio

nal

dw

ellin

gs

per

an

nu

m



Housing Trajectory Figures C

C.1 Comments (to be read in conjunction with the housing trajectory table):

A. The estimated figures for 2009-2010 (500 gross and 400 net) are lower than most previousyears and take account of information on dwelling gains and losses on Valuation Officeschedules up to October 2009. They reflect the poor current housing market.

B. In April 2009, the number of plots remaining on sites already under construction or partcomplete was 1,228 (approx), of which at least 92% can be considered deliverable within5 years or earlier.

C. The number of dwellings with planning permission or on sites with permission subject to aSection 106 agreement was 4,312 (approx) of which at least 64% can be regardeddeliverable in 5 years or earlier.

D. About 1,180 additional dwellings are possible on remaining sites (without a currentpermission) allocated for housing in the UDP or identified for housing in SPG for Hattersleyand Mottram. A proportion of these sites could also be developed within 5 years.

E. Redundant school sites from the Building Schools for the Future programme are estimatedto provide about 750 dwellings, with the first homes possibly delivered from 2012 onwards.

F. A large number of additional completions are expected from sites provisionally identifiedin Tameside Council’s draft Strategic Housing Land Availability study, which is intendedfor public consultation in early 2010. Most of the sites regarded as suitable for housing aremore likely to be developed after 5 years.

G. The predicted rate of clearance in UDP policy H1 is 170 dwellings pa. Actual averagedwelling losses, including changes of use and conversions, have been 215 dwellings pafor the period 2003-2009. It is estimated there could be about 100 losses during the currentmonitoring year, 2009-2010, based on those recorded so far this year. Thereafter, thereappears to be little prospect of widespread clearance and so a much reduced allowanceof 70 dwelling losses per year has been adopted.

H. The estimated gross area for years 2010-2015 assumes an average density of 50 dwellingsper hectare. Average gross density of sites under construction is 50 per ha, and sites withpermission 61 per ha approx. It has been assumed that the average density of completionsis likely to fall in response to current market conditions as revised schemes are submittedfor certain sites such as some of those with a high proportion of flats.

I. Total projected net provision for the 18 year period 2003-2021 is 13,616 dwellings, including2934 completions (net) 2003-2008 and 652 in the reporting year 2008-2009.The projectedtotal therefore exceeds the total RSS requirement for 15,000 extra dwellings.

J. By 2021 the RSS target of 13,500 dwellings over 18 years has been met with a margin of116. However, for the remaining 3 years of the trajectory (2021-2024) a slightly lowercompletion rate is anticipated.



C Housing Trajectory Figures

D Saved Policies

Will be superceded by policy contained in the following Development PlanDocuments.

Part One Policies

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.1 Capturing Quality Jobs for Tameside People

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.2 Maintaining an Integrated Transportation Strategy

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.3 Creating a Cleaner and Greener Environment

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.4 Providing More Choice and Quality of Homes

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.5 Following the Principles of Sustainable Development

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.6 Securing Urban Regeneration

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.7 Supporting the Role of Town Centres

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.8 Retaining and Improving Opportunities for Sport, Recreation and Leisure

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.9 Maintaining Local Access to Employment and Services

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.10 Protecting and Enhancing the Natural Environment

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.11 Conserving Built Heritage and Retaining Local Identity

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.12 Ensuring an Accessible, Safe and Healthy Environment

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD1.13 Meeting Obligations on Minerals, Waste and Energy

Part Two Policies

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDE1 Regional Investment Site / Strategic Regional Site

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDE2 Development Opportunity Areas

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDE3 Established Employment Areas

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDE5 Local Employment Opportunities and Mixed Uses

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDE6 Detailed Design of Employment Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDE7 Local Access to New Employment

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH1 HousingLand Provision

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH2 Unallocated Sites

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH4 Type, Size and Affordability of Dwellings

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH5 Open Space Provision

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH6 Education and Community Facilities

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH7 Mixed Use and Density

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH8 Gypsies, Travellers and Showmen

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH9 Backland and Garden Development

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDH10 Detailed Design of Housing Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS1 Town Centre Improvement

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS2 New Retail Developments in Town Centres

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS3 New Retail Developments outside Town Centres

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS4 Retail Dominance and Shopping Frontages

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS5 Changes of Use in Local Shopping Centres

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS6 New Local Shopping Developments



Saved Policies D


Part One Policies

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS7 Food and Drink Establishments and Amusement Centres

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS8 Built Recreation, Leisure and Tourism Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS9 Detailed Design of Retail and Leisure Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDS10 Existing Out-of-CentreRetailParks and Stores

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL1 Protection of the Green Belt

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL2 Existing Buildings in the Green Belt

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL3 Major Developed Sites in the Green Belt

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL4 Protected Green Space

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL6 Outdoor Sport, Recreation and Play Space Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL7 Potential of Water Areas

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL8 Informal Recreation and Countryside Access

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL9 DerelictLand Reclamation

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL10 Landscape Quality and Character

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL11 Support for Agriculture

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL12 Development Associated with Agriculture

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL13 Accommodation for Agricultural Workers

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL14 Allotments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL15 Openness and Appearance of RiverValleys

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDOL16 PeakDistrictNational Park

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT1 Highway Improvement and Traffic Management

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT2 Trunk Road Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT3 Major Highway Scheme

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT4 Rail Infrastructure

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT5 Metrolink Extension

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT6 Facilities for Buses

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT7 Cycling

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT8 Walking

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT9 Freight Movement

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT10 Parking

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT11 Travel Plans

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT12 Special Needs

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT13 Transport Investment

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDT14 Transport Assessments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC1 Townscape and Urban Form

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC2 Conservation Areas

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC3 Demolition of Unlisted Buildings in Conservation Areas

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC4 Control of Development in or adjoining Conservation Areas

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC5 Alternative Uses, Alterations and Additions for Listed Buildings



D Saved Policies


Part One Policies

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC6 Setting of Listed Buildings

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC7 Enabling Development for Conservation of Heritage Assets

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC8 Demolition of Listed Buildings

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC9 Historic Parks and Gardens

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC10 Development Affecting Archaeological Sites

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC11 Shop Fronts

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDC12 Art in the Environment

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN1a International Nature Conservation Sites

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN1b National Nature Conservation Sites

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN2 Locally Designated Nature Conservation Sites

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN3 Nature Conservation Factors

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN4 Trees and Woodland

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN5 Trees Within Development Sites

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN6 Protection and Enhancement of Waterside Areas

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDN7 Protected Species

Joint Minerals Development Plan DocumentMW1 Protection of Mineral Resources

Joint Minerals Development Plan DocumentMW2 Supply of Aggregate Minerals

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDMW3 Reclamation of Derelict Land

Joint Minerals Development Plan DocumentMW5 Movement of Minerals and Waste

Joint Waste Development Plan DocumentMW6 Waste Management Facilities

Joint Waste Development Plan DocumentMW7 Recycling, Collection and Ancillary Waste Management

Joint Waste Development Plan DocumentMW8 Energy from Waste

Joint Waste Development Plan DocumentMW9 Control of Minerals and Waste Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDMW10 Development on or near Landfill Sites

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDMW11 Contaminated Land

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDMW12 Control of Pollution

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDMW13 Hazardous Installations

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDMW14 Air Quality

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDMW15 Protection of Water Resources

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDU1 Utilities Infrastructure

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDU2 Telecommunications

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDU3 Water Services for Developments

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDU4 Flood Prevention

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDU5 Energy Efficiency

Core Strategy and Development Management DPD and Site Allocations DPDU6 Renewable Energy

Table D.1 Saved Tameside Replacement UDP



Saved Policies D

E Abbreviations

Annual Business InquiryABIAir Quality Management AreaAQMAAnnual Monitoring ReportAMRDepartment for Communities and Local GovernmentDCLGDwellings per hectareDPHGross value addedGVAIndex of Multiple DeprivationIMDLocal Development FrameworkLDFLocal Development SchemeLDSNational Land Use DatabaseNLUDNomenclature of Units for Territorial StatisticsNUTSNorth West Regional AssemblyNWRAOffice of the Deputy Prime MinisterODPMQuality Bus CorridorQBCRegistered Social LandlordRSLRegional Spatial StrategyRSSSustainability AppraisalSASpecial Area of ConservationSACSite of Biological ImportanceSBIStrategic Housing Land Availability AssessmentSHLAASuper Output AreaSOASpecial protected AreaSPASite of Special Scientific InterestSSSITransport Innovation FundTIFTree Preservation OrderTPOUnitary Development PlanUDP

Table E.1 Abbreviations



E Abbreviations