annualized site reports, 2002 - ncjrsannualized site reports 2002 the 2002 annualized site reports...

Annualized Site Reports

2002

Adult Male Weighted Data

Adult Female Unweighted Data

Juvenile Unweighted Data

August 2003

Annualized Site Reports 2002

The 2002 Annualized Site Reports is one in a series of annual concatenations of quarterly data collected by ADAM sites. This volume continues in the format of the 2000 and 2001 Annualized Site Reports, which represented considerable innovation from prior versions. The revised format showcases data from the ADAM adult instrument and, for male arrestees, reports probability-based data.

This compilation was produced by NORC at the University of Chicago, the national contractor for the ADAM program. Data from 2002 were collected under an National Institute of Justice contract by NORC. Readers are invited to visit the ADAM website for further information, including the codebook for the 2002 dataset and instructions for obtaining data (http://www.adam-nij.net/dandr.asp), as well as the methodological chapters of the 2000 ADAM Annual Report and the Analytic and Methodology Guides (http://www.adam-nij.net/report.asp).

Interpreting the ADAM Data This volume is organized into separate sections for adult male arrestees, adult female arrestees, and juvenile detainees, due to differences in how the respective data are collected. In this context, “adult” and “juvenile” refer to the facilities where the data were collected, not to the person’s age as such. Some arrestees who are less than 18 years of age are booked as adults due to offenses involved. Male and female arrestees can be booked in the same or in different facilities, depending on the local site. The adult male arrestee data are weighted according to statistical sampling techniques, while the adult female arrestee and juvenile detainee data are self-weighted. Because of this discrepancy, adult male and female data are not fully comparable within sites. The percentage estimates reported in the adult male quarterly reports are calculated from the weighted data, not the raw (self-weighted) percentages of the number who were interviewed or tested for drugs. While the raw and weighted percentages are normally quite similar (as a result of sampling plans designed to equalize probabilities of selection to the extent possible), this is not always the case.

Confidence intervals are provided on page 1 of the annualized reports for male arrestees. Confidence intervals represent the range of values for those sampled within which the true population value is likely to fall. ADAM adheres to the conventional confidence interval of 95 percent. Therefore, if the proportion of arrestees testing positive for cocaine is estimated to be 50 percent with a confidence interval of ±5 percent, we can say with 95-percent confidence that the true value in the population represented is within 45 percent and 55 percent. The availability of confidence intervals is a significant improvement that provides greater assurance that findings accurately represent the sampled populations of arrestees.

In 2000, stratified sampling (collecting cases in all or nearly all adult booking facilities) was implemented at sites where there were two to six adult facilities. Two-stage stratified cluster sampling was implemented at sites where there were a larger number of

Page iii

facilities. For sites with stratified cluster samples (including the “feeder” variation), the ADAM data represent the specific facilities within which data collection occurred. Future goals include weighting the data for adult male arrestees so that they represent the entire relevant arrestee catchment area, and bringing the female arrestees under weighting protocols similar to those adopted for the male samples.

The format of the adult male and female site reports presented here is standardized across sites, with four pages per site of tables and charts illustrating characteristics of arrestees and their drug-using and drug acquisition behavior. The format of the juvenile site reports is also standardized across sites, with one page per site of tables and charts illustrating characteristics of juvenile detainees and trends in their drug-using behavior. The following sections detail the variables that can be found on each of the four pages that comprise the adult male and female arrestee site reports. The juvenile data tables are parallel to the adult ones, so are not described separately. We recommend the reader refer back to this discussion often when reviewing the site reports.

Page One: Overview of the Sample The first page of the adult male and female site reports presents official data, as well as selected characteristics of each site’s data collection effort for the year. At the top of this page, we include the number of booking facilities in which data were collected and the total number of facilities in the county (or other catchment area). The total number of facilities includes both male and female facilities and represents those facilities for which data are included in the annualized report. For sites with stratified cluster samples, the range of facilities is identified, rather than just those in which data were collected.

The sample size (or unweighted count) is also displayed, and in the male reports, this datum is followed by the total number of bookings recorded in the sampled facilities across all ADAM data collection periods during 2002 (this is the weighted count). The sample size reflects all arrestees selected for the interview, including those who did not participate. (Readers can obtain the number of eligible and completed interviews for each site on our website, in the report Drug Use and Related Matters Among Adult Arrestees & Juvenile Detainees, 2002). An interview refusal rate is provided for those who actively refused to participate, and a urine refusal rate is given for those who did not provide a urine specimen after completing the interview. “Refusals” comprise a subcategory of those cases selected according to the sampling plan who did not participate in ADAM. Other possible reasons for noparticipation include the arrestee being taken to court while the interview was scheduled to be conducted, being released from custody or transferred elsewhere, exhibiting violent or uncontrolled behavior, and so forth.

The following paragraphs provide an overview of the tables on page one of the adult reports. All of the male numbers referred to here are weighted estimates of the male arrestee population, while all female numbers are self-weighted and thus refer to the number of completed interviews or (for relevant tables) completed urine tests.

Age of Male/Female Booked Arrestees. This table represents the estimated population of all arrestees who completed an interview by age.

Page iv

Race of Male/Female Booked Arrestees. This table represents the estimated population of arrestees by race, including all arrestees who completed an interview. Race data are obtained from official records at the booking facility. In some communities, the official records do not code ethnicity; therefore, these sites may undercount Hispanic and Asian arrestees. In cases where an arrestee reports multiple racial categories or this information is missing, s/he is coded “Unknown.”

Percent Male/Female Positive for Drugs. This table contains three parts: Total Percent Positive, Percent Positive by Drugs and Age, and Percent Positive by Drugs and Race.

In the first part, “Total Percent Positive,” estimates for the percentage of arrestees who test positive for each of the listed drugs are calculated as the number testing positive for the specific drug divided by the total number of people in the population who provided a urine sample. Note that on page one only, “cocaine” refers to both crack and powder cocaine.

The “any drug” and “multiple drugs” variables are derived from five tests for the most commonly found drugs—cocaine, marijuana, opiates, methamphetamine, and phencyclidine (PCP). When a urine sample tests positive for one of these drugs, “any drug” is coded “yes,” and in cases where a urine sample tests positive for more than one of these drugs, “multiple drugs” is coded “yes.” Please note that the urinalysis tests for drugs other than these five; in such cases where a urine sample tests positive for one of these other drugs and not one of the major five, the case is nevertheless not counted in the “any drug” category. Likewise, if a sample tests positive for only one of the five major drugs but one or more of the other drugs, this case will not be included in the “multiple drugs” category.

For a complete discussion of how to derive confidence intervals and what they mean, see the Analytic Guide for ADAM (pp. 5–6).

In the second part of this table, “Percent Positive by Drugs and Age,” the individual age groups are calculated as the number of people testing positive for the specific drug within each age group, divided by the total number of people in that age group who provided a urine sample. Those with no age indicated are categorized in “Unknown.”

In the third part of this table, “Percent Positive by Drugs and Race,” the categories for race/ethnicity are derived from the race variable on the facesheet, which includes an Hispanic category. This category is calculated as the number of people testing positive for the specific drug within a particular race/ethnicity divided by the number of people of that race/ethnicity who provided a urine sample. Those with no race/ethnicity indicated are categorized as “Unknown.”

Page v

Percent Male/Female Positive for Drugs by Offense Category. This table reports the rate at which those arrested with particular offense types test positive for drugs. For example, the first column reports the rate at which arrestees charged with a violent offense tested positive for any drug, cocaine, marijuana, and so forth, in 2002.

ADAM charge codes are used to create the offense categories. Those with no offense indicated are not eligible to participate. These categories are not meant to be mutually exclusive, making the construction of one offense variable with multiple values inappropriate. Urine weights are used in all frequencies for male site reports.

Page Two: Self-Reported Demographics and Drug Use Patterns The second page of the adult male and female site reports provides additional descriptive statistics on the sample; many of these variables are unavailable prior to 2000, due to the substantially revised ADAM instrument implemented during that year. Information presented here based on new variables include type of health insurance, housing characteristics, self-reported drug use in different time periods (i.e., 30 days and 12 months), and comparisons between the rate at which arrestees test positive for particular drugs and the rate at which they self-report that drug use.

The rates presented in the tables on this page reflect the total number of valid responses from arrestees who completed an interview. The 12-month use variable is based on self-reported marijuana, crack cocaine, powder cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine use in the past 12 months; the 30-day use variable is based on self-reported use of the same drug(s) in the past 30 days. The rate of past-year reported arrests can come from responses to either the arrest questions in the calendar portion of the questionnaire or the summary arrest question asked of those who are not administered the calendar questions. The bullets below provide more detailed information on each of these variables.

Education of Booked Arrestees. These percentages are based on the total number of valid responses to the demographic degree question—in other words, the number of responses indicating a particular degree level divided by the number of valid responses to the question. Groups are mutually exclusive and sum to 100 percent.

Current Housing for Booked Arrestees. These percentages are based on the total number of valid responses to the demographic housing question, which is to say, on the number of responses indicating a particular residence type divided by the number of valid responses to the question. Groups are mutually exclusive and sum to 100 percent.

Current Employment Status for Booked Arrestees. This variable is constructed from an employment variable, military status variable, and seasonal work variable. Full-time homemakers, those coded as “other,” and employees not working due to illness, strike, furlough, and leave are excluded. Percentages are based on the total number of valid responses (i.e., the number

Page vi

of responses indicating a particular employment status divided by the number of valid responses to the question). Groups are mutually exclusive and sum to 100 percent.

Current Health Insurance for Booked Arrestees. Percentages are based on the entire population (“missing” and “don’t know” cases are excluded from the base). Groups are mutually exclusive and sum to 100 percent.

Self-Reported Use of Five Primary Drugs: Past Twelve Month Use for Booked Arrestees. These percentages are based on the entire population (affirmative responses for the specific drug divided by valid responses and “not applicable,” with “don’t know” and “missing” cases excluded from the base).

Self-Reported Use of Five Primary Drugs: Average Number of Days Used Past Year by Drug among Self-Reported 12-Month Users. Calendar data are used to compute the average number of days each drug was used in the past year. The base for these variables is those arrestees who reported drug use in the past 12 months. Each variable is created using the midpoints of the intervals associated with each monthly frequency level (level 0 use translates to 0 days, level 1 use to 3.5 days, level 2 use to 10 days, level 3 use to 21.5 days). These values represent the average of the self-reported level of use for each month during the past year multiplied by 12, for those reporting a level of use (which may include 0) for at least 6 of the last 12 months.

Past 30-Day Use for Booked Arrestees. Percentages are based on the entire population (affirmative responses to the specific drug divided by valid responses and “not applicables,” with “don’t know” and “missing” cases excluded from the base).

Sensitivity Indicator: Among Males Who Test Positive, Rate of Self-Report. This chart illustrates the rate at which those respondents who tested positive for a drug on the urinalysis reported using that drug in the prior 7 days (upper bar) and the prior 3 days (lower bar). The sample varies with the drug. In the case of cocaine, for example, the bars refer to those arrestees who tested positive for cocaine, with the top bar indicating the rate of self-reported cocaine use in the prior 7 days, and the bottom bar, in the prior 3 days.

Note that the use of powder cocaine and crack is combined, as the urinalysis test does not distinguish between these drugs at the current time. In addition, comparability for opiate items is not exact. Self-reported opiate use refers specifically to heroin, while urinalysis results may include a small percentage of other opiate users.

Self-Reported Arrests in Past Year for Booked Arrestees. These frequencies are the result of collapsing ranges of a continuous variable into the ranges shown. Calculations are based on those booked arrestees who completed an interview (i.e., the number of respondents in a particular arrest category

Page vii

divided by the number of respondents who completed an interview). Groups are mutually exclusive and sum to 100 percent (“missing” responses are excluded).

Injected Drugs in Past Year for Booked Arrestees. The percentages reported here are based on the population, with “don’t know” and “missing” responses excluded. Groups are mutually exclusive and sum to 100 percent.

Page Three: Treatment Experience and Need for Treatment The third page includes treatment and dependence/abuse indicators:

Past Experience with Any Treatment. In this table, we present data on treatment services usage by arrestees who reported using one or more drugs in the past 12 months. The first column, Percent Any Treatment Ever, displays drug users’ lifetime rates of inpatient and outpatient drug treatment and mental health treatment by specific drugs used. Subsequent columns break down this figure into treatment type, including inpatient drug, outpatient drug, and mental health, by timeframe. Arrestees who reported ever receiving a particular kind of treatment were then asked to identify the number of days they spent in that kind of treatment by month, over the course of the prior year.

Risk for Drug Dependence and Abuse. The dependence and abuse chart is based on a screen that organizes arrestees according to their degree of risk. Indicators include using a drug more than intended or neglecting responsibilities, wanting to cut down, others objecting to one’s use, frequently thinking about using, and using to relieve negative emotions.1 Arrestees who cross the threshold between no risk and abuse are considered at risk for abuse. Similarly, if an arrestee qualifies as dependent, s/he is considered at risk for dependence. This screen is partly based on criteria for a diagnosis of Drug/Alcohol Dependence and Abuse, as defined in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.

Respondents who reported no alcohol or drug use in the past 12 months were automatically classified as “No Risk.” The risk scale is defined in the box to the right of the chart, but the levels general consist of the following qualifications:

No past-year alcohol or drug use, or fewer than two positive responses on the screen, indicates that an arrestee is not at risk for either abuse or dependence.

1 After two quarters of testing the above indicators, it was found that almost all respondents who reported using more than intended also reported neglecting responsibilities; therefore, these are now effectively counted as a single indicator.

Page viii

An arrestee is at risk for abuse if s/he reports a combination of two indicators from those listed above; except if the two indicators are thinking about using and using to relieve negative emotions (in which case the arrestee is considered at risk for dependence). Conversely, an arrestee is also considered to be at risk for abuse if three or more indicators are present, but neither thinking about use nor using to relieve negative emotions is reported.

An arrestee is at risk for dependence if s/he reports a combination of three or more indicators, provided that thinking about using or using to relieve negative emotions is present. If both thinking about using and using to relieve negative emotions are the only two indicators, this also indicates dependence.

Page Four: Drug Market Dynamics All tables and charts on the final page are limited to respondents who reported obtaining a drug in the past 30 days (note that this does not require them to have used the drug). The sample sizes represent the sample figures; however, for male site reports, the percentages in the charts reflect the weighted data. This distinction is made because in some cases, the numbers are so small as to no longer be analytically meaningful. The percentages, however, indicate the rate at which these incidents occur in the arrestee population.

Percent Reporting Circumstance of Last Drug Buy. In this first table, we report the locations where individuals obtained drugs in the past 30 days, including a public building, a house or apartment, or an outdoor area.

Percent Reporting Other than Cash Transaction. This table presents the manner of transaction among those who obtained a drug through non-cash means, for example, trading drugs, trading property, and trading sex. Percentages are based on the number of respondents reporting they obtained a specific drug through means other than paying cash.

Methods of Obtaining the Five Primary Drugs. This chart includes only those respondents who reported obtaining a drug in the past 30 days. The bars represent mutually exclusive methods of obtaining the specific drug: cash only, non-cash means only, and a combination of both.

Acquiring Drugs Without Paying Cash (Manufacture or Other). This chart represents arrestees who acquired drugs through non-cash means and reports the rate at which they manufactured their own drugs or obtained them through other methods (e.g., credit, fronted to sell, transported or stole drug). Percentages are based on arrestees who self-reported obtaining drugs without paying any cash at some point in the last 30 days.

Reasons Why Drugs Not Purchased by Events and Location of Drug Purchase. These final two charts on page 4 consider only respondents who

Page ix

reported attempting to obtain drugs with cash in the past 30 days. Such a small proportion of the population is represented in these charts that the data cannot be displayed by drug type. The first chart assumes that at some point in the past 30 days, the respondent attempted to obtain drugs through cash, but for some reason the drug was not purchased. This chart illustrates the proportion of individual factors that led to nonpurchase of the drug in such cases. The final chart illustrates the rate at which those who obtained drugs with cash reported getting it inside their neighborhood or outside their neighborhood.

Page x

Adult Male Weighted Data

CAPITAL AREA Primary City: CAPITAL AREA (ALBANY)

2002 Adult Male Program Findings(Male findings are weighted and represent probability-based sampling.)

Facilities in Sample: 7 Interview Refusal Rate: 25.4%

Other County Facilities: 12 Urine Refusal Rate: 21.5%

Sample Size: 1254

Total Bookings during Annual Data Collection: 2888

Age of Male Booked Arrestees (%) Race of Male Booked Arrestees (%)

Estimated Population

Description of the Male Sample

Education of Booked Arrestees (%) Current Housing for Booked Arrestees (%)

Highest educational degree completed Type of Place in Prior 30 Days Current Work Status Current Health Insurance

None 33.1 House, mobile home, apartment 88.7Working full time/ active military status

47.3 No Insurance 63.0

High school or GED 45.7 Group quarters 3.7 Working part-time/ seasonal 14.7 Individually Purchased 3.3

Vocational or trade school 1.8

Hospital or care facility 0.8

Unemployed (looking for work) 25.3

Employer or Union Funded 15.8

Some college or two- year associate 16.9

Incarceration Facility 1.0

Unemployed (not looking for work) 3.6

State Government Funded 13.9

Four year degree or higher 2.5 Shelter 1.9 In school only 3.2 Retirement Medicare 0.4

No Fixed Residence 3.0 Retired 0.2 Disability Medicare 3.1

Other 0.9 Disabled for work 5.8 Multiple Types 0.5

Self Reported Use of Five Primary Drugs Sensitivity Indicator: Among Male Who Test Positive, Rate of Self ReportPast 12 Month Use for Booked Arrestees (%)

Crack Cocaine 19.1Powder Cocaine 19.2Marijuana 62.5 No Drug Use Past Year 27.8Heroin 6.7 Didn't Inject Drugs 66.4Methamphetamine 1.3 Injected Drugs 5.8

Crack Cocaine 84Powder Cocaine 39Marijuana 147Heroin 101Methamphetamine 26

Past 30 Day Use for Booked Arrestees (%)Self-Reported Arrests in Past Year for Booked Arrestees (%)

Crack Cocaine 14.1Powder Cocaine 9.5 None 55.7%Marijuana 55.1 1-2 38.9%Heroin 4.5 3-5 4.5%Methamphetamine 0.6 6 or more 0.9%

CAPITAL AREA 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS

Average Number of Days Used Past Year byDrug among Self-Reported 12-Month Users

Current Employment Status for Booked Arrestees (%)

Current Health Insurance for Booked Arrestees (%)

Injected Drugs in Past Year for Booked Arrestees (%)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine

Self Reported Seven Day Use

Self Reported Three Day Use

2

Self-Reported Male Drug Users and Their Past Experience with TreatmentPercent Treatment Time by Type of Treatment

Ever % Last Ave. # Mos. Ever % Last Ave. # Mos. Ever % Last Ave. # Mos.Year* Last Year Year* Last Year Year* Last Year

Crack Cocaine Users 79.9 64.5 14.4 2.0 64.5 25.5 3.0 21.7 2.0 2.0Powder Cocaine Users 69.4 49.1 11.2 2.0 48.6 25.8 3.0 30.7 1.5 2.0Marijuana Users 53.4 33.2 12.1 2.0 40.0 24.4 3.0 14.0 3.7 2.0Methamphetamine Users 100.0 100.0 9.8 2.0 70.6 25.0 3.0 76.5 9.8 2.0Heroin Users 87.5 77.6 13.5 2.0 67.1 15.1 2.0 36.2 4.1 2.0

*Rate based on those who reported ever receiving inpatient, outpatient, or mental health treatment, respectively.

Male Risk of Dependency and Abuse


Outpatient Mental Health TreatmentPercent Any Treatment Ever

Inpatient

63%

5%

32%

48%

10%

42%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

No Risk Risk of Abuse Risk of Dependency

Alcohol Drugs

Defining Dependence & Abuse** -----

Dependence: Pattern of alcohol or drug use resulting in a combination of three or more indicators, including using more than intended, neglecting responsibilities, wanting to cut down, others object to use, frequently thinking about using, and using to relieve emotions; provided that thinking about using or relieving emotions is included in the three or more indicators. If both thinking about using and relieving emotions are the only two indicators, this indicates dependence.Abuse: Pattern of alcohol or drug use resulting in a combination of two indicators from those listed above; except, if the two indicators are both thinking about drinking/using drugs and relieving emotions. Also, abuse is indicated if three or more are indicated but neither thinking about use nor relieving emotions is reported.Note: For both dependence and abuse, positive responses to using more than intended and neglecting responsibilities represent only one indicator. Further, designations are mutually exclusive.

**Based on American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV criteria.

3

Dynamics of Drug Markets in Past 30 Days for Male Arrestees% Reporting Circumstance of Last Drug Buy % Reporting Other than Cash Transaction

Public House Outdoor Other Trade Trade Traden Building Apartment Area Area n Drugs Property Sex Other*

Crack Cocaine 58 1.8 35.8 62.4 0.0 Crack Cocaine 44 3.7 16.4 0.0 79.9Powder Cocaine 33 6.6 52.4 37.9 3.0 Powder Cocaine 27 0.0 3.2 5.0 91.8Marijuana 160 4.2 54.7 40.2 0.9 Marijuana 186 2.5 2.1 1.7 93.7Heroin 18 0.0 70.9 29.1 0.0 Heroin 11 0.0 9.0 0.0 91.0Methamphetamine 2 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 Methamphetamine 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0

*Credit, fronted, manufactured, transport/steal drugs, gift, other)Methods of Obtaining the Five Primary Drugs n = 286 Acquiring Drugs by Non-Cash (Manufacture or Other) n = 214

Reasons Why Drugs Not Purchased by Events n = 72 Location of Drug Purchase n = 207


Dealers were not available

40%

Other11%

Police activity8%

Dealers did not have the quality

you wanted21%

Dealers did not have any

20%

Inside your neighborhood

47% Outside your neighborhood

53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine

cash only non-cash only combination

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine

Manufactured Non-Manufactured

4

BERNALILLO COUNTY Primary City: ALBUQUERQUE




Sample Size: 1831


























ALBUQUERQUE 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

43%

13%

45%

54%

8%

38%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


Alcohol Drugs




3








26%

Other5%

Police activity8%


you wanted17%


44%


39%

Outside your neighborhood

61%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

ANCHORAGE BOROUGH Primary City: ANCHORAGE




Sample Size: 842


























ANCHORAGE 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

41%

10%

49%52%

13%

35%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


Alcohol Drugs




3








21%

Other16%

Police activity5%


you wanted26%


32%


32%


68%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

FULTON & DEKALBPrimary City: ATLANTA




Sample Size: 937


























ATLANTA 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

64%

7%

29%

47%

11%

42%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Alcohol Drugs




3








13%Other18%

Police activity15%


you wanted26%


28%


42%


58%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

JEFFERSON COUNTY Primary City: BIRMINGHAM




Sample Size: 741


























BIRMINGHAM 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

59%

10%

30%

58%

10%

32%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Alcohol Drugs




3








31%

Other25%

Police activity1%


you wanted9%


34%


36%


64%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

CHARLOTTE-METRO Primary City: CHARLOTTE-METRO




Sample Size: 881


























CHARLOTTE-METRO 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2






CHARLOTTE-METRO 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS


Inpatient

68%

11%

22%

54%

10%

36%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%


Alcohol Drugs




3






CHARLOTTE-METRO2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS


14%

Other33%

Police activity7%


you wanted23%


23%


28%


72%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

COOK COUNTY Primary City: CHICAGO




Sample Size: 1391


























CHICAGO 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

70%

6%

24%

39%

11%

50%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%


Alcohol Drugs




3








15%

Other32%

Police activity18%


you wanted14%


21%


52%Outside your neighborhood

48%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

CUYAHOGA COUNTY Primary City: CLEVELAND




Sample Size: 2567


























CLEVELAND 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

63%

8%

28%

49%

9%

42%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Alcohol Drugs




3








32%

Other17%

Police activity9%Dealers did not

have the quality you wanted

22%


20%


54%Outside your neighborhood

46%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

DALLAS COUNTY Primary City: DALLAS




Sample Size: 1745


























DALLAS 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

61%

12%

28%

55%

12%

33%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Alcohol Drugs




3








22%

Other16%

Police activity8%


you wanted14%


40%


34%


66%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

DENVER COUNTY Primary City: DENVER




Sample Size: 1222


























DENVER 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2








Inpatient

58%

10%

31%

60%

11%

29%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Alcohol Drugs




3








31%

Other16%

Police activity9%


you wanted7%


37%


41%


59%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

methamphetamine

heroin

marijuana

powder cocaine

crack cocaine


4

POLK COUNTY Primary City: DES MOINES




Sample Size: 872


























DES MOINES 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

meth

opiates

marijuana

cocaine



2






DES MOINES 2002 ADULT MALE PROGRAM FINDINGS


Inpatient

64%

7%

29%

46%

10%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Alcohol Drugs


Dependence: Pattern of alcohol or drug use resulting in a combination of three or more indicators, including using more than intended, neglecting responsibilities, wanting to cut down, others object to use, frequently thinking about using, and using to relieve emotions; provided that thinking about using or relieving emotions is included in the three or more indicators. If both thinking about using and relieving emotions are the only two indicators, this indicates dependence.Abuse: Pattern of alcohol or drug use resulting in a combination of two indicators from those listed above; except, if the two indicators are both thinking about

annualized site reports, 2002 - ncjrsannualized site reports 2002 the 2002 annualized site reports...

Documents