another in a series of discussions of interesting issues regarding disclosures under new dol rules

1
Inbox | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/mbox?displayMBoxItem=&itemID=A116092402_105&trk=COMM_NI[8/1/2011 12:47:55 PM] Liz Jutila Add Connections Account Type: Basic Home Profile Contacts Groups Jobs Inbox Companies News More Compose Message Inbox Sent Archived Message detail Trash Another in a series of discussions of interesting issues regarding disclosures under new DOL rules Fred Reish · Partner/Chair, Financial Services ERISA Team To: Liz Jutila Date: July 18, 2011 Archive This is another in a series of discussions of interesting issues regarding disclosures under new DOL rules. The 408(b)(2) regulation requires that covered service providers disclose all “compensation.” On the face of it, that seems clear, but in practical application, it is more difficult. For example, must broker-dealers and others disclose all compensation, including revenue sharing? The answer is “yes.” Must all revenue sharing be disclosed? The answer is, “It depends on whether it is compensatory.” While the regulation provides little guidance on what is “compensatory,” the DOL has explained its position in guidance about Schedule C to the 5500 Form: “If a person providing services to the plan is provided a meal or other entertainment based on a general business relationship that includes both ERISA and non-ERISA business, is it required to be reported on Schedule C? It depends. The Schedule C instructions state that indirect compensation would not include compensation that would have been received had the service not been rendered to the plan or the transaction had not taken place with the plan and that cannot be reasonably allocated to the services(s) performed or transaction(s) with the plan. However, if a person's eligibility for receipt of a gift (such as meals, travel, or entertainment) is based, in whole or in part, on the value (e.g., assets under management, contract amounts, premiums) of contracts, policies or transactions (or classes thereof) placed with ERISA plans, the gift would constitute reportable indirect compensation for Schedule C purposes. Where the eligibility for or amount of the gift is based on a book of business, including ERISA plan business, a pro rata share of the value of the gift should be treated as indirect compensation for the ERISA plans involved.” Reply Learn More » Learn More » Got Tax Problems? Get tax relief from tax negotiation pro; 27 yrs exp, CPA, xIRS, guaranteed. Need A Good Biz Book? Emotional Intelligence 2.0 is a best seller endorsed by the Dalai Lama. Ads Help Center About Blog Careers Advertising Recruiting Solutions Tools Mobile Developers Publishers Language Upgrade My Account LinkedIn Corporation © 2011 User Agreement Privacy Policy Copyright Policy Send Feedback Reply Forward Delete Report Spam Inbox

Upload: lizjutila

Post on 25-Jul-2015

41 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Another In A Series Of Discussions Of Interesting Issues Regarding Disclosures Under New Dol Rules

Inbox | LinkedIn

http://www.linkedin.com/mbox?displayMBoxItem=&itemID=A116092402_105&trk=COMM_NI[8/1/2011 12:47:55 PM]

Liz Jutila Add ConnectionsAccount Type: Basic

Home Profile Contacts Groups Jobs Inbox Companies News More

Compose Message

Inbox

Sent

Archived

Message detail

Trash

Another in a series of discussions of interesting issues regardingdisclosures under new DOL rules

Fred Reish · Partner/Chair, Financial Services ERISA TeamTo: Liz JutilaDate: July 18, 2011

Archive

This is another in a series of discussions of interesting issues regarding disclosures undernew DOL rules.

The 408(b)(2) regulation requires that covered service providers disclose all“compensation.” On the face of it, that seems clear, but in practical application, it is moredifficult. For example, must broker-dealers and others disclose all compensation, includingrevenue sharing? The answer is “yes.” Must all revenue sharing be disclosed? The answeris, “It depends on whether it is compensatory.”

While the regulation provides little guidance on what is “compensatory,” the DOL hasexplained its position in guidance about Schedule C to the 5500 Form:

“If a person providing services to the plan is provided a meal or other entertainment basedon a general business relationship that includes both ERISA and non-ERISA business, is itrequired to be reported on Schedule C?

It depends. The Schedule C instructions state that indirect compensation would not includecompensation that would have been received had the service not been rendered to theplan or the transaction had not taken place with the plan and that cannot be reasonablyallocated to the services(s) performed or transaction(s) with the plan. However, if aperson's eligibility for receipt of a gift (such as meals, travel, or entertainment) is based, inwhole or in part, on the value (e.g., assets under management, contract amounts,premiums) of contracts, policies or transactions (or classes thereof) placed with ERISAplans, the gift would constitute reportable indirect compensation for Schedule C purposes.Where the eligibility for or amount of the gift is based on a book of business, includingERISA plan business, a pro rata share of the value of the gift should be treated as indirectcompensation for the ERISA plans involved.”

Reply

Learn More »

Learn More »

Got Tax Problems?Gettax

relief from taxnegotiation pro; 27 yrs exp,CPA, xIRS, guaranteed.

Need A Good BizBook?

EmotionalIntelligence 2.0 is a bestseller endorsed by the DalaiLama.

Ads

Help Center About Blog Careers Advertising Recruiting Solutions Tools Mobile Developers Publishers Language Upgrade My Account

LinkedIn Corporation © 2011 User Agreement Privacy Policy Copyright Policy Send Feedback

Reply Forward Delete Report Spam

Inbox