anthony correa stephanie regan kasha geels. moral judgments broadly defined as evaluative judgments...

16
Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels

Upload: verity-skinner

Post on 12-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Anthony CorreaStephanie Regan

Kasha Geels

Page 2: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Moral JudgmentsBroadly defined as evaluative judgments of

the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the context of socialized perceptions of right and wrong (Moll et al. 2005)

Page 3: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Development of Thinking about Moral JudgmentMoral judgments have been thought to rely

solely on controlled, rational, and logical thought processes (Kohlberg, 1969; Turiel, 1983).

More recent research includes an emotional component in moral judgments as well. Some argue for the belief that moral judgments are direct products of implicit processes (e.g. guilt, compassion; compete and interact to guide morality without having conscious awareness that this is taking place).

“Moral intuitions”

Page 4: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Moral EmotionsDerive from self consciousness and

evaluationImplicit processes Examples are guilt; compassion

Page 5: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Controlled Cognitive ProcessesThey play a role in moral judgment only when

situational demand necessitates them (e.g. moral dilemma)

Explicit processing

Page 6: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Dual Process and Interactionist Models of Moral JudgmentDual Process – implicit and explicit processes

both form moral judgments and often compete against one another

Interactionist – believes that moral judgments are formed by the integration of social contextual knowledge, social semantic knowledge, and basic motivational and emotional drives.

Page 7: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Table 1 Summarized5 types of moral judgments accessed:

Impersonal moral dilemmasPersonal moral dilemmasViolation of social normsSocial affective situationsIntent involved in situations that engender self-

benefitThe moral judgment is the resolution to the

dilemmas.

Page 8: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Brain FunctionWe know where the processing center of neural

thought takes place, it is in the Basal Ganglia where the caudate is transmitting continuously between its Two spheres.

The Fornix which retains working memory and long term episodic memory trigger like in PTSD, borders the Basal Ganglia and the Cingulate Gyrus.

The Caudate is proximal to the fornix share transmission.

The Anterior Cingulate Cortex is a Hub for signal distribution, highly active in attention, perception, social cognition and moral judgment.

The emotional component resides in the Amygdala which is directly linked to the Basal Ganglia therefore the pathway would progress anterior toward PFC.

Page 9: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Regions of Prefrontal Cortex

Page 10: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Brain Regions

Page 11: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex VMPFC

Page 12: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Function of PFCThe area associated with cognitive and

executive functionPFC segmented into DLPFC, VLPFC, VMPFC,

DMPFC, OFC regions. Medial and Orbital Frontal regions hubs for

integrating emotional and viscerally arousing information

Fusiform face area – neural mechanism dedicated to perception of faces

Page 13: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

DLPFC involved in “working memory?” Is according to the article involved in receiving

emotional and visceral arousing information from the medial and orbital frontal region of the brain.

Given the top down afferent transmission in relation to the Basal Ganglia this remains speculative.

Through proximity DLPFC gathers information from the somatosensory and motor cortices.

Reasoning the Striatum of the Basal Ganglia is where the stop/go mechanism resides

Page 14: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Basal Ganglia transmission pathway

Page 15: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Pyramid Neuron

Page 16: Anthony Correa Stephanie Regan Kasha Geels. Moral Judgments Broadly defined as evaluative judgments of the appropriateness of one’s behavior within the

Pyramid Cells